0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views4 pages

Understanding Degradation Fundamentals

Uploaded by

pengfeiliu37
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views4 pages

Understanding Degradation Fundamentals

Uploaded by

pengfeiliu37
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Understanding Degradation Fundamentals

By Dr. Kerry Johanson


Material Flow Solutions, Inc.

The use of nano-particles in bulk solid materials has led to enhanced ability of these
materials. There is a movement in industry to create large size particles (agglomerates)
with a high degree of porosity and large surface areas where nano-particles on the
surface perform various functions. Herein lies the dilemma. Large particles are
preferred due to the lack of cohesive flow problems. However, large particles have low
surface area and, hence, limited chemical functionality. One solution to this particle
design process quandary is to use an agglomeration process that creates a large
porous particle from a series of small nano-particles. Unfortunately, these engineered
materials are generally both highly porous and friable, resulting in significant
degradation during use. Whatever the reason, particle size degradation of particles is a
problem in today’s production facilities. Degradation produces fines that limit the life of
catalysis in fluid bed operations. It causes fines production in pharmaceutical products
that subsequently segregate, resulting in quality issues. Particle size degradation
causes consumer acceptance issues with many products from food to bath products.
Degradation issues also lead to dust generation problems and environmental discharge
concerns.

Thus, measuring and understanding degradation is critical to help engineers and


materials scientists design processes and products that minimize these effects.
There are several key issues to developing a robust method to mitigate size
degradation effects. Degradation is caused by different external influences. Placing
material in a condition where it is exposed to large stresses and high strains can cause
a reduction in particle size due to particle breakage under the stress/strain behavior.
Impact can also result in particle breakage. Particle size degradation can be quantified
by observing the shift in particles size after subjecting particles to a controlled impact
condition or a controlled strain condition.

For example, Figure 1 shows a typical shift in the cumulative particle size as bran buds
are subjected to repeated impact conditions. Notice that this shift is not equal for all
particle sizes. The maximum shift appears to occur at particle sizes around 2000
microns. If the particular process of interest operated at material impact velocities of
11.8 ft/sec, then this figure could be used to estimate the amount of fines generated
during plant operation. However, real plants operate within a range of impact velocities,
and also a range of stress and strain conditions. Thus, degradation should be
measured at various conditions and used with process models to compute the
integrated effect of particle size degradation based on the range of impact velocities and
stresses in the prescribed process equipment (Figure 2).

Copyright © 2008 [email protected]


Typical Shift in Particle Size after 300 Impacts

100
90
80

Percent Passing (%)


70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
3 4
100 1 .10 1 .10

Particle Diameter (micron)


Before Test
After Test

Figure 1. Shift in particle size of bran buds when subjected to 300 impacts at 11.8
ft/sec impact velocity.

2.5
Increase in particles size (%)

1.5

0.5

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Impact Velocity (ft/sec)
3200 micron 2600 micron 2200 microns 1000 micron

Figure 2. Shift in particle size of bran buds when subjected to 300 impacts at 11.8
ft/sec impact velocity.

Figure 2 shows the increase in bran particle size for 100 repeated impacts at various
impact velocities. This figure shows the cumulative increase in particle size for a given
maximum particle size limit at various impact velocities between 0 ft/sec and 14 ft/sec.
These types of impact velocities may exist in mixing, blending, and drying equipment in
typical handling facilities. Notice that the 3200 micron material shows less size
degradation than the 2200 micron material. This suggests that the 3200 particles are
breaking faster than they are being generated by the breakage of larger particles. The
particle size degradation of 1000 micron particles is also less than the 2200 micron

Copyright © 2008 [email protected]


materials. In this case, the rate of production of 1000 micron particles is slower than the
rate of production of 2200 micron particles. We routinely compute the stress and strain
levels and impact conditions in typical process equipment. Suppose that the primary
process of interest was principally an impact process, such as drying in a rotary drum.
This is degradation analysis combined with calculations of impact velocities allows us to
estimate the overall process degradation. If the drum is 2-foot in diameter has lifter bars
and operates at 20 RPM with a fill rate of 7%, then the expected impact velocities are
around 8.6 ft/sec. However, multiple impacts occur after the initial drop onto the pile
from the lifter blades. In addition, not all the material drops the full distance. Taking all
this into account and assuming about 150 impact events before material exits, the drum
leads to an estimated increase in 1000 micron material of about 0.52%. It is important
to note that many processes depend on both impact and stress and strain effects and
will require performing degradation tests as a function of impact velocity as well as
stress/strain effects.

This type of analysis helps with process issues, but does not address the rudimentary
cause of particle breakage. Therefore, it is difficult to apply to particle design.
However, modifying the degradation test method allows us to determine the
mechanisms involved in size reduction. In this case, the test is run at a controlled
constant impact or stress/strain condition for various times. This generates a series of
particle size distribution curves as a function of the time applied (Figure 3).

100
90
80
Cummulative Volume (%)

70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100 1000 10000
Particle Diameter (micron)

0 sec 60 sec 600 sec

Figure 3. Shift in particle size of bran buds when subjected to repeated impacts at
17.8 ft/sec.

This technique is called population balance modeling. Particle size distribution is


broken into individual particle size bins and equations describing the rate of transfer
between particle size distribution bins. This series of equations can be solved for both
the rate of breakage and the breakage mode. Figure 4 shows the type of breakage that

Copyright © 2008 [email protected]


occurs. When a given particle size breaks, a series of particles result. If fracture is an
important effect, then a large fraction of particles end up in an adjacent particle size bin.
If abrasion is occurring, then the fraction transferred directly to fine particles is large.
This figure shows the fraction of bin size #1 (6258 micron) that ends up in bin size #2 is
only 30%. The remaining material of this size distributes between bin sizes #3 and #4.
This suggests that both abrasion and fracture are occurring during impact of (6258
micron) bran buds at this velocity. Conversely, almost all of the material in bin size #3
(1723 microns) ends up in bin Size #4 (904 microns) indicating, 93% fracture of 1723
micron particles. Likewise, the behavior of bin #4 and bin #5 suggest abrasion is the
predominant degradation mechanism of particles less than 904 microns.

Impact Breakage Selectivity for Bran Buds

Bin 1 = 8208 micron to 4308 micron


Bin 2 = 4308 micron to 2261 micron
1 Bin 3 = 2261 micron to 1186 micron
0.9 Bin 4 = 1186 micron to 623 micron
0.8 Bin 5 = 623 micron to 327 micron
0.7 Bin 6 = 327 micron to 171 micron
0.6 Bin 7 = 171 micron to 90 micron
0.5
0.4
Bin #5
0.3 Bin #4
0.2 Bin #3
0.1 Bin #2
Bin #1
0
2 3 4 5 6 7
Attrition Particle Size Bin #

Bin #1 Bin #2 Bin #3 Bin #4 Bin #5

Figure 4. Results of population balance modeling for bran buds after impact at 17.8
ft/sec.

Examining the structure of these bran buds can lead to what may be causing these
mechanistic degradation effects. Careful examination of a bran bud indicates that buds
are made of a collection of flakes or particles that are roughly 900 microns. These
primary particles are librated from the bud particle matrix by an initial breakage event
followed by abrasion of the 900 micron primary particles to finer material. Strengthening
the binding action between these original particles will help reduce particle size
degradation of bran buds. Thus, a population balance degradation study provides a
powerful analysis to determine the modifications to the structure of the particles that will
lead to a reduction in attrition. At Material Flow Solutions, Inc., we can provide you with
a degradation analysis for your process or provide you a population balance model
analysis of your product to aid with product design.

Copyright © 2008 [email protected]

You might also like