Oc (Kec 058) Unit 3 Notes - Part 2
Oc (Kec 058) Unit 3 Notes - Part 2
BEC
-057 OPTICAL COMMUNICATION 3L:0T:0P 3 Credits
Text Book:
1. John M. Senior, “Optical Fiber Communications”, Pearson, 3rd Edition, 2010.
2. Gerd Keiser, “Optical Fiber Communications”, McGraw Hill, 5th Edition, 2013.
3. Govind P. Agrawal, “Fiber Optic Communication Systems”, John Wiley, 3rd Edition, 2004.
Course Outcomes: At the end of this course students will demonstrate the ability to:
1. Define and explain the basic concepts and theory of optical communication.
2. Describe the signal losses with their computation and dispersion mechanism occurring inside the optical
fiber cable.
3. Differentiate the optical sources used in optical communication with their comparative study.
4. Identify different optical components on receiver side; assemble them to solve real world problems
related to optical communication systems.
5. Evaluate the performance of an optical receiver to get idea about power budget and ultimately be an
engineer with adequate knowledge in optical domain.
1
OPTF_C07.qxd 11/6/08 10:57 Page 405
Figure 7.3 The structure of a planar LED showing the emission of light from all surfaces
structures have a low thermal impedance in the active region allowing high current densi-
ties and giving high-radiance emission into the optical fiber. Furthermore, considerable
advantage may be obtained by employing DH structures giving increased efficiency from
electrical and optical confinement as well as less absorption of the emitted radiation.
This type of surface emitter LED (SLED) has been widely employed within optical fiber
communications.
The structure of a high-radiance etched well DH surface emitter* for the 0.8 to 0.9 μm
wavelength band is shown in Figure 7.5 [Ref. 11]. The internal absorption in this device is
very low due to the larger bandgap-confining layers, and the reflection coefficient at the
back crystal face is high giving good forward radiance. The emission from the active layer
is essentially isotropic, although the external emission distribution may be considered
Lambertian with a beam width of 120° due to refraction from a high to a low refractive
index at the GaAs–fiber interface. The power coupled Pc into a multimode step index fiber
may be estimated from the relationship [Ref. 12]:
Pc = π (1 − r)ARD(NA)2 (7.22)
where r is the Fresnel reflection coefficient at the fiber surface, A is the smaller of the
fiber core cross-section or the emission area of the source and RD is the radiance of the
source. However, the power coupled into the fiber is also dependent on many other factors
including the distance and alignment between the emission area and the fiber, the SLED
emission pattern and the medium between the emitting area and the fiber. For instance, the
addition of epoxy resin in the etched well tends to reduce the refractive index mismatch
and increase the external power efficiency of the device. Hence, DH surface emitters often
give more coupled optical power than predicted by Eq. (7.22). Nevertheless Eq. (7.22)
may be used to gain an estimate of the power coupled, although accurate results may only
be obtained through measurement.
Example 7.4
A DH surface emitter which has an emission area diameter of 50 μm is butt jointed
to an 80 μm core step index fiber with a numerical aperture of 0.15. The device has a
radiance of 30 W sr−1 cm−2 at a constant operating drive current. Estimate the optical
power coupled into the fiber if it is assumed that the Fresnel reflection coefficient at
the index matched fiber surface is 0.01.
Solution: Using Eq. (7.22), the optical power coupled into the fiber Pc is given by:
Pc = π (1 − r)ARD(NA)2
Thus:
In this example around 41 μW of optical power is coupled into the step index fiber.
OPTF_C07.qxd 11/6/08 10:57 Page 411
The enhanced waveguiding of the edge emitter enables it in theory [Ref. 16] to couple
7.5 times more power into low-NA fiber than a comparable surface emitter. However, in
practice the increased coupling efficiency has been found to be slightly less than this (3.5
to 6 times) [Refs 16, 17]. Similar coupling efficiencies may be achieved into low-NA fiber
with surface emitters by the use of a lens. Furthermore, it has been found that lens
coupling with edge emitters may increase the coupling efficiencies by comparable factors
(around five times).
The stripe geometry of the edge emitter allows very high carrier injection densities for
given drive currents. Thus it is possible to couple approaching a milliwatt of optical power
into low-NA (0.14) multimode step index fiber with edge-emitting LEDs operating at high
drive currents (500 mA) [Ref. 18].
Edge emitters have also been found to have a substantially better modulation band-
width of the order of hundreds of megahertz than comparable surface-emitting structures
with the same drive level [Ref. 17]. In general it is possible to construct edge-emitting
LEDs with a narrower linewidth than surface emitters, but there are manufacturing prob-
lems with the more complicated structure (including difficult heat-sinking geometry)
which moderate the benefits of these devices.
OPTF_C07.qxd 11/6/08 10:57 Page 423
Figure 7.17 An ideal light output against current characteristic for an LED
respectively. It may also be noted that there is a shift to lower peak emission wavelength
(i.e. higher energy) through reduction in doping in Figure 7.22(b), and hence the active
layer composition must be adjusted if the same center wavelength is to be maintained.
The differences in the output spectra between InGaAsP SLEDs and ELEDs caused
by self-absorption along the active layer of the devices are displayed in Figure 7.23. It
may be observed that the FWHP points are around 1.6 times smaller for the ELED than
the SLED [Ref. 13]. In addition, the spectra of the ELED may be further narrowed by
the superluminescent operation due to the onset of stimulated gain and in this case the
linewidth can be far smaller (e.g. 30 nm) than that obtained with the SLED.
Figure 7.22 LED output spectra: (a) output spectrum for an AlGaAs surface emitter
with doped active region [Ref. 7]; (b) output spectra for an InGaAsP surface emitter
showing both the lightly doped and heavily doped cases.
Figure 7.23 Typical spectral output characteristics for InGaAsP surface- and edge-
emitting LEDs operating in the 1.3 μm wavelength region [Ref. 13; © Elsevier]
OPTF_C07.qxd 11/6/08 10:57 Page 428
Figure 7.25 The frequency response for an optical fiber system showing the electrical
and optical bandwidths
Example 7.6
Compare the electrical and optical bandwidths for an optical fiber communication
system and develop a relationship between them.
Solution: In order to obtain a simple relationship between the two bandwidths it is
necessary to compare the electric current through the system. Current rather than
voltage (which is generally used in electrical systems) is compared as both the opti-
cal source and optical detector (see Section 8.6) may be considered to have a linear
relationship between light and current.
OPTF_C07.qxd 11/6/08 10:57 Page 429
Electrical bandwidth: The ratio of the electric output power to the electric input
power in decibels REdB is given by:
The electrical 3 dB points occur when the ratio of electric powers shown above is --12 .
Hence it follows that this must occur when:
G Iout J 2 1 Iout 1
= or =
I Iin L 2 Iin √2
Thus in the electrical regime the bandwidth may be defined by the frequency when
the output current has dropped to 1/√2 or 0.707 of the input current to the system.
Optical bandwidth: The ratio of the optical output power to the optical input
power in decibels ROdB is given by:
(due to the linear light/current relationships of the source and detector). Hence the
optical 3 dB points occur when the ratio of the currents is equal to --12 , and:
Iout 1
=
Iin 2
Assuming negligible parasitic capacitance, the speed at which an LED can be directly
current modulated is fundamentally limited by the recombination lifetime of the carriers,
where the optical output power Pe(ω) of the device (with constant peak current) and angular
modulation frequency ω is given by [Ref. 66]:
Pe(ω) 1
= 1 (7.24)
Pdc [1 + (ωτ i)2]---2
where τi is the injected (minority) carrier lifetime in the recombination region and Pdc is
the d.c. optical output power for the same drive current.
Example 7.7
The minority carrier recombination lifetime for an LED is 5 ns. When a constant d.c.
drive current is applied to the device the optical output power is 300 μW. Determine
the optical output power when the device is modulated with an rms drive current cor-
responding to the d.c. drive current at frequencies of (a) 20 MHz; (b) 100 MHz.
It may be assumed that parasitic capacitance is negligible. Further, determine the
3 dB optical bandwidth for the device and estimate the 3 dB electrical bandwidth
assuming a Gaussian response.
Solution: (a) From Eq. (7.24), the optical output power at 20 MHz is:
Pdc
Pe(20 MHz) = 1
[1 + (ωτ i)2]---2
300 × 10−6
= 1
[1 + (2π × 20 × 106 × 5 × 10−9)2]---2
300 × 10−6
= 1
[1.39]---2
= 254.2 μW
300 × 10−6
Pe(100 MHz) = 1
[1 + (2π × 100 × 106 × 5 × 10−9)2]---2
300 × 10−6
= 1
[10.87]---2
= 90.9 μW
OPTF_C07.qxd 11/6/08 10:57 Page 431
This example illustrates the reduction in the LED optical output power as the device
is driven at higher modulating frequencies. It is therefore apparent that there is a
somewhat limited bandwidth over which the device may be usefully utilized.
To determine the optical 3 dB bandwidth, the high-frequency 3 dB point occurs
when Pe(ω)/Pdc = --12 Hence, using Eq. (7.24):
1 1
=
2 ---12
[1 + (ωτi) ] 2
√3 √3
f= = = 55.1 MHz
2πτ π × 10−8
Thus the 3 dB optical bandwidth Bopt is 55.1 MHz as the device, similar to all LEDs,
operates down to d.c. level.
Assuming a Gaussian frequency response, the 3 dB electrical bandwidth B will be:
55.1
B= = 39.0 MHz
√2
LEDs may be fabricated which are largely free from these defects and are therefore
subject to a slower long-term degradation process. This homogeneous degradation is
thought to be due to recombination enhanced point defect generation (i.e. vacancies and
interstitials), or the migration of impurities into the active region [Ref. 76]. The optical
output power Pe(t) may be expressed as a function of the operating time t, and is given by
[Ref. 76]:
where Pout is the initial output power and βr is the degradation rate. The degradation rate is
characterized by the activation energy of homogeneous degradation Ea and is a function of
temperature. It is given by:
Example 7.8
An InGaAsP surface emitter has an activation energy of 1 eV with a constant of pro-
portionality (β0) of 1.84 × 107 h−1. Estimate the CW operating lifetime for the LED with
a constant junction temperature of 17°C, if it is assumed that the device is no longer
useful when its optical output power has diminished to 0.67 of its original value.
Solution: Initially, it is necessary to obtain the degradation rate βr. Thus from
Eq. (7.26):
βr = β0 exp(−Ea/KT)
A −1 × 1.602 × 10−19 D
= 1.84 × 107 exp
C 1.38 × 10−23 × 290 F
= 1.84 × 107 exp(−40)
= 7.82 × 10−11 h−1 Therefore:
Pe(t) and:
= exp(−βrt) = 0.67
Pout
ln 0.67 0.40
t= =
7.82 × 10−11 7.82 × 10−11
= 5.1 × 109 h