Playwrite-vs-Selenium-with-Java-and-TestNG
Playwrite-vs-Selenium-with-Java-and-TestNG
Selenium
with Java and TestNG
This presentation compares two popular web automation frameworks:
Playwright and Selenium. We'll explore their features, strengths,
weaknesses, and how to use them effectively with Java and TestNG.
MP by Mohit Patel
Introduction to Selenium and Playwrite
Selenium Playwrite
Selenium is a widely adopted web automation framework, Playwright is a newer framework built by Microsoft, known
a pioneer in the field, offering robust tools for browser for its streamlined API, cross-browser compatibility, and
interactions and testing. It's versatile and well-supported efficient handling of modern web features. It's gaining
but can face challenges with modern web technologies. popularity for its speed and ease of use.
Key Features and Capabilities
of Selenium
Selenium: Excellent support for Selenium: Can be more complex, Selenium: Can face challenges with
major browsers, including older requiring more code for basic tasks. modern web technologies. Playwrite:
versions. Playwrite: Excellent support Playwrite: Streamlined and intuitive Handles modern web features like
for all major browsers, with a focus API, making it easier to write and web components and service
on modern web features. maintain scripts. workers seamlessly.
Advantages and
Disadvantages of Each
Framework
Selenium Playwrite
Advantages: Extensive Advantages: User-friendly API,
community, wide browser excellent modern web
support, mature framework support, automatic wait
with proven reliability. handling, code generation
Disadvantages: Complex API, tools. Disadvantages: Newer
less support for modern web framework, smaller
features, potential community compared to
synchronization issues. Selenium.
Using TestNG with Selenium
and Playwrite