Models of communication
Models of communication
COMMUNICATION
BAILA AFTAB
Contents
Introduction Conclusion
(Context vs Models) (Inferences)
01 03
Linear Models of Transactional Models of
Communication Communication
02
Interactional Models of
Communication
THE LINEAR MODEL
• Noise: distortion in channel not intended by the source. It is anything not intended by the
informational source.
The Linear Model
Categories
Shannon-
Aristotle Model Lasswell’s Model Berlo’s S-M-C-R
Weaver Model
of of Model of
of
Communication Communication Communication
Communication
Limitations
First, the model presumes that there Second, communication does not Furthermore, to suggest that
is only one message in the have a definable beginning and communication is simply one person
communication process. ending. speaking to another oversimplifies
the complex communication process.
The Interactional Model
• In other words, communication goes in two directions: from sender to receiver and from
receiver to sender.
• This circular process suggests that communication is ongoing. And involves sharing of
meanings with feedback that links source and receiver.
Osgood
Schramm
Model
Westley and
MacLean’s
Model
Limitations
Dance’s Barnlund’s
Helical Transactional
Model Model
Conclusion
Different
Environments
Inferences
Holistic
Contexts of understanding why Field of
Communication models are needed? Experiences
1 3 5
2 4 6
– Ethos
– Pathos
– Logos
Criticism
– No concept of feedback
– No concept of communication failure
– Model can only be used in public speaking
Example of Shannon Weaver Model
A businessman sends a message via phone text to his worker about a meeting
happening about their brand promotion. The worker does not receive the full
message because of noise. It goes like this:
Businessman: We have a meeting at the office (“at 8 am” goes missing due to
phone network disruption or noise)
Here:
Sender: Businessman
Encoder: Telephone network company
Channel: Mobile network
Noise: Missing text due to disruption
Decoder: Mobile phone
Receiver: Worker
Levels of Communication Problems
– There are three levels of problems of communication according to Shannon
Weaver. They are:
1. Technical problem –How a channel causes a problem. Means, How accurately can the
symbol of communication be transmitted? when the decoder, encoder or channel causes
the problems. For example, when a machine important for the communication of the
message has a fault.
2. Semantic problem –Is the meaning of message sent and received very different. Means,
How precisely do the transmitted symbols convey the desired meaning? This is when the
message that was sent is different from the message that was received (a practical way to
think about this is the game ‘Telephone’, also known as ‘Chinese whispers’ or ‘telephono
roto’. The message is lost somewhere in the retelling.).
3. Effectiveness problem –How effectively does the message cause reaction. Means, How
effectively does the received meaning affect conduct in the desired way? This explains
how well the message can cause a response or reaction from the receiver.
Disadvantages
• Here, the gatekeeper are the decision makers who letting the whole social system.
The gatekeeper is having its own influence like social, cultural, ethical and political.
Based on personal or social influences they let the information to the group.
• Through this process the unwanted, sensible and controversial information’s are
removed by the gate keeper which helps to control the society or a group and
letting them in a right path.
• In news medium editor play vital role. He has to decide what kind of news items will
publish and what should not.
Example
An international news channel receives numbers of news items within day like
international terror issues, UN discussions, Texas bull fighting and religious abuse on
international community.
News items:
N1: Texas bull fiaghting, N2: International terror issues, N3: UN discussions, N4:
religious abuse on international community
Gatekeeper:
Chief Editor
Selected News Items:
N2: International terror issues, N3: UN discussions,
Discarded News Items: (on popularity)
N1: Texas bull fighting
Discarded News Items: (on policy)
N4: Religious abuse on International community
Two-step Flow of Communication
• Theory of communication that proposes that interpersonal interaction has a far
stronger effect on shaping public opinion than mass media outlets.
• It stipulates that mass media content first reaches “opinion leaders,” people who are
active media users and who collect, interpret, and diffuse the meaning of media
messages to less-active media consumers.
• According to the authors, opinion leaders pick up information from the media, and this
information then gets passed on to less-active members of the public.
• This implies that most people receive information from opinion leaders through
interpersonal communication rather than directly from mass media.
Advantages
– There is the concept of feedback.
– As the message comes from the environment, sensory field
improves the message formation.
– Social and other factors are included in objects of orientation.
– The model can be applied to interpersonal, group communication
as well as mass communication.
– The model is very descriptive.
Criticism
– There are many variables even for simple communication
which makes the model very complicated.
– The model is only two-dimensional and does not explain
communication which involves multiple messages and
complicated messages.
– The information can get modified while sending it from the
sender to the receiver as there can be noise. The model
does not account for noise in communication.
Interaction Model The
Schramm Model