Module10 A B1.1 B2
Module10 A B1.1 B2
BT-A1-1000-LN
BT-B1.1-1000-LN
BT-B2-1000-LN
Revision and Amendment Status
These course notes have been produced in accordance with AMC 147.A.120, Part 66 and
AMC/GM Rev May 2012.
00 01.01.2015 This document is produced from TTS and reviewed according to Part- 66 S. Güncan
Appendix I.
01 14.09.2015 UK CAA specific notes were removed in sub-modules10.1 and 10.7. S. Sönmezışıklar
S.Gökmen
R.Aykan
02 31.03.2016 Sub-modules 10.0 and 10.5 were added. Revised for format change S. Sönmezışıklar
including cover, header and footer.
Level
Sub Rev.
10 Rev. Date Page(*)
Module Nbr.
A1 B1.1 B2
Module 10
Licence Category A, B1 and B2
Aviation Legislation
DH Decision Height
EC European Commission
EU European Union
EM Engine Manual
EU-OPS The requirements for an Air Operators Certificate for operation of an aircraft for
CAT. Replaces JAR-OPS. Now replaced by AIR-OPS
FAA Federal Aviation Administration – The National Aviation Authority (NAA) of the
United States of America.
GA General Aviation – Activity and operation of aircraft of MTOM less than 5700 kg.
GM Guidance Material – Interpretive material for the EASA Implementing Rules (See
also AMC)
G/S Glideslope
JAR Joint Aviation Regulations – Aviation regulations devised and promulgated by the
JAA and implemented into all JAA member states. Now superseded by EASA
Regulations and Implementing Rules.
JAR-OPS The original requirements for an Air Operators Certificate for operation of an
aircraft for CAT. Replaced by EU-OPS (and now AIR-OPS).
MCTOM Maximum Certified Take-Off Mass
MTWA Maximum Take-off Weight Authorized (now replaced by MTOM in metric system)
NAA National Aviation Authority – the aviation authority of any individual state
SB Service Bulletin
SL Service Letter
TC Type Certificate
UN United Nations
Module 10
Licence Category B1 and B2
Aviation Legislation
LEVEL 1
A familiarisation with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and
examples.
The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
LEVEL 2
A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
An ability to apply that knowledge.
Objectives:
The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
LEVEL 3
A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive
manner.
Objectives:
The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects.
The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics
describing the subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's
instructions.
The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
http://www.icao.int
http://www.easa.europa.eu
http://eur-lex.europa.eu
An organisation was needed to develop these articles and as a result the ICAO came into
existence in 1947, based in Montreal Canada. The ICAO is one of the many Agencies of the
United Nations (UN).
Convention on International Civil Aviation (also known as Chicago Convention), was signed on
7 December 1944 by 52 States. Pending ratification of the Convention by 26 States, the
Provisional International Civil Aviation Organization (PICAO) was established. It functioned from
6 June 1945 until 4 April 1947. By 5 March 1947 the 26th ratification was received. ICAO came
into being on 4 April 1947. In October of the same year, ICAO became a specialized agency of
the United Nations linked to Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC).
The Convention on International Civil Aviation set forth the purpose of ICAO:
"WHEREAS the future development of international civil aviation can greatly help
to create and preserve friendship and understanding among the nations and
peoples of the world, yet its abuse can become a threat to the general security;
and
Each member country of the ICAO is known as a ‘Contracting State’ due to their contractual
commitment to the Chicago Convention.
The Assembly, composed of representatives from all Contracting States, is the sovereign body
of ICAO. It meets every three years, reviewing in detail the work of the Organization and setting
policy for the coming years. It also votes a triennial budget.
The Council, the governing body which is elected by the Assembly for a three-year term, is
composed of 36 States. The Assembly chooses the Council Member States under three
headings: States of chief importance in air transport, States which make the largest contribution
to the provision of facilities for air navigation, and States whose designation will ensure that all
major areas of the world are represented. As the governing body, the Council gives continuing
direction to the work of ICAO. It is in the Council that Standards and Recommended Practices
are adopted and incorporated as Annexes to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The
Council is assisted by the Air Navigation Commission (technical matters), the Air Transport
Committee (economic matters), the Committee on Joint Support of Air Navigation Services and
the Finance Committee.
The Secretariat, headed by a Secretary General, is divided into five main divisions: the Air
Navigation Bureau, the Air Transport Bureau, the Technical Co-operation Bureau, the Legal
Bureau, and the Bureau of Administration and Services. In order that the work of the Secretariat
shall reflect a truly international approach, professional personnel are recruited on a broad
geographical basis.
ICAO works in close co-operation with other members of the United Nations family such as the
World Meteorological Organization, the International Telecommunication Union, the Universal
Postal Union, the World Health Organization and the International Maritime Organization. Non-
governmental organizations which also participate in ICAO's work include the International Air
Transport Association, the Airports Council International, the International Federation of Air Line
Pilots' Associations, and the International Council of Aircraft Owner and Pilot Associations.
Current Membership
There are currently 191 ICAO members, consisting of 190 of the 193 UN members (all but
Dominica, Liechtenstein, and Tuvalu), plus the Cook Islands.
Liechtenstein has delegated Switzerland to implement the treaty to make it applicable in the
territory of Liechtenstein.
ICAO also standardizes certain functions for use in the airline industry, such as the Aeronautical
Message Handling System (AMHS), making it a standards organization.
Both ICAO and IATA have their own airport and airline code systems. ICAO uses 4-letter airport
codes (vs. IATA's 3-letter codes). The ICAO code is based on the region and country of the
airport—for example, Charles de Gaulle Airport has an ICAO code of LFPG, where L indicates
Southern Europe, F, France, PG, Paris de Gaulle.
ICAO also assigns 3-letter airline codes (versus the more-familiar 2-letter IATA codes—for
example, UAL vs. UA for United Airlines). ICAO also provides telephony designators to aircraft
operators worldwide, a one- or two-word designator used on the radio, usually, but not always,
similar to the aircraft operator name. For example, the identifier for Japan Airlines International
is JAL and the designator is Japan Air, but Aer Lingus is EIN and Shamrock. Thus, a Japan
Airlines flight numbered 111 would be written as "JAL111" and pronounced "Japan Air One One
One" on the radio, while a similarly numbered Aer Lingus would be written as "EIN111" and
pronounced "Shamrock One One One".
ICAO maintains the standards for aircraft registration ("tail numbers"), including the
alphanumeric codes that identify the country of registration. For example, airplanes registered in
the United States have tail numbers starting with N.
ICAO is also responsible for issuing alphanumeric aircraft type codes containing two to four
characters. These codes provide the identification that is typically used in flight plans. The
Boeing 747 would use B741, B742, B743, etc., depending on the particular variant.
Standardisation has been achieved through the creation of 19 Annexes to the Convention,
known as International Standards and Recommended Practices. The difference between the
two is that a standard is essential and recommended practice is desirable. If a member state
has a standard different from ICAO then it must inform ICAO of the difference.
In Europe, the applicable EASA certification standards for the certification of aircraft to be
internationally recognized are issued in accordance with the ICAO Annexes. Then, from a
practical point of view, the certification process is based on these airworthiness standards rather
than (directly) on the ICAO International Standards.
Annex 1 Personnel Licensing - provides information on licensing of flight crews, air traffic controllers,
and aircraft maintenance personnel, including medical standards for flight crews and air traffic
controllers.
Annex 2 Rules of the Air - contains rules relating to visual and instrument-aided flight.
Annex 3 Meteorological Service for International Air Navigation - provides meteorological services for
international air navigation and reporting of meteorological observations from aircraft.
Annex 4 Aeronautical Charts - contains specifications for the aeronautical charts used in international aviation.
Annex 5 Units of Measurement to be used in Air and Ground Operations – lists dimensional systems to be used
in air and ground operations.
Annex 6 Operation of Aircraft - enumerates specifications to ensure a level of safety above a prescribed
minimum in similar operations throughout the world. The three parts of this Annex are as follows:
- Part I. International Commercial Air Transport - Airplanes
- Part II. International General Aviation - Airplanes
- Part III. International Operations - Helicopters.
Annex 7 Aircraft Nationality and Registration Marks - specifies requirements for registration and identification of
aircraft.
Annex 8 Airworthiness of Aircraft - specifies uniform procedures for certification and inspection of
aircraft.
Annex 9 Facilitations - provides for the standardization and simplification of border crossing formalities.
Annex 11 Air Traffic Services - includes information on establishing and operating ATC, flight information, and
alerting services.
Annex 12 Search and Rescue - provides information on organization and operation of facilities and services
necessary for search and rescue (SAR).
Annex 13 Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation - provides for uniformity in notifying, investigating, and
reporting on aircraft accidents.
Annex 14 Aerodromes - contains specifications for the design and equipment of aerodromes.
Annex 15 Aeronautical Information Services - includes methods for collecting and disseminating aeronautical
information required for flight operations.
Annex 17 Security - Safeguarding International Civil Aviation against Acts of Unlawful Interference - specifies
methods for safeguarding international civil aviation against unlawful acts of interference.
Annex 18 The Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air - specifies requirements necessary to ensure
hazardous materials are safely transported in aircraft while providing a level of safety that protects the
aircraft and its occupants from undue risk.
Annex 19 Safety Management - The Safety Management System (SMS) framework applies to organizations
responsible for the type design and manufacture of aircraft
The EU traces its origins from the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) and the
European Economic Community (EEC), formed by the Inner Six countries in 1951 and 1958,
respectively. In the intervening years, the community and its successors have grown in size by
the accession of new member states and in power by the addition of policy areas to its remit.
The Maastricht Treaty established the European Union under its current name in 1993 and
introduced the European Citizenship. The latest major amendment to the constitutional basis of
the EU, the Treaty of Lisbon, came into force in 2009.
Austria (1995)
Belgium (1958)
Bulgaria (2007)
Croatia (2013)
Cyprus (2004)
Czech Republic (2004)
Denmark (1973)
Estonia (2004)
Finland (1995)
France (1958)
Germany (1958)
Greece (1981)
Hungary (2004)
Ireland (1973)
Italy (1958)
Latvia (2004)
Lithuania (2004)
Luxembourg (1958)
Malta (2004)
Netherlands (1958)
Poland (2004)
Portugal (1986)
Romania (2007)
Slovakia (2004)
Slovenia (2004)
Spain (1986)
Sweden (1995)
United Kingdom (1973)
The European Council uses its leadership role to sort out disputes between member states and
the institutions, and to resolve political crises and disagreements over controversial issues and
policies. It acts externally as a "collective head of state" and ratifies important documents (for
example, international agreements and treaties).
European Commission
The European Commission acts as the EU's executive arm and is responsible for initiating
legislation and the day-to-day running of the EU. The Commission is also seen as the motor of
European integration. It operates as a cabinet government, with 28 Commissioners for different
areas of policy, one from each member state, though Commissioners are bound to represent
the interests of the EU as a whole rather than their home state.
European Parliament
The European Parliament forms one half of the EU's legislature (the other half is the Council of
the European Union). The 751 Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) are directly
elected by EU citizens every five years on the basis of proportional representation. Although
MEPs are elected on a national basis, they sit according to political groups rather than their
nationality. Each country has a set number of seats and is divided into sub-national
constituencies where this does not affect the proportional nature of the voting system.
The Parliament and the Council of the European Union pass legislation jointly in nearly all areas
under the ordinary legislative procedure. This also applies to the EU budget. Finally, the
Commission is accountable to Parliament, requiring its approval to take office, having to report
back to it and subject to motions of censure from it. The President of the European Parliament
carries out the role of speaker in parliament and represents it externally. The EP President and
Vice-Presidents are elected by MEPs every two and a half years.
Composition
The 28 Commissioners, one from each EU country, provide the Commission’s political
leadership during their 5-year term. Each Commissioner is assigned responsibility for specific
policy areas by the President.
The President is nominated by the European Council. The Council also appoints the other
Commissioners in agreement with the nominated President.
The appointment of all Commissioners, including the President, is subject to the approval of the
European Parliament. In office, they remain accountable to Parliament, which has sole power to
dismiss the Commission.
The day-to-day running of the Commission is taken care of by the Commission’s staff –
administrators, lawyers, economists, translators, interpreters, secretarial staff, etc. organised in
departments known as Directorates-General (DGs).
The term ‘Commission’ can be used to refer to the 28 individual Commissioners, the permanent
staff or the institution as a whole.
The Commission represents and upholds the interests of the EU as a whole. It oversees and
implements EU policies by:
When the Commission proposes a law, it tries to satisfy the widest possible range of interests.
To get the technical details right, it consults experts through various committees and groups. It
also holds public consultations.
The Commission’s departments produce a draft of the proposed new law. If at least 14 of the 28
Commissioners agree with it, the draft is then sent to the Council and Parliament. After debating
and amending the draft, they decide whether to adopt it as a law.
The Commission manages funding for EU policies (e.g. agriculture and rural development) and
programmes such as 'Erasmus' (student exchanges).
If it thinks a national government is failing to apply EU law, the Commission first sends an
official letter asking it to correct the problem. As a last resort, the Commission refers the issue to
the Court of Justice. The Court can impose penalties, and its decisions are binding on EU
countries and institutions.
It also negotiates international agreements for the EU such as the Cotonou Agreement (on aid
and trade between the EU and developing countries in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific).
Location
The Commission is based in Brussels and Luxembourg and has offices (representations) in
every EU country and delegations in capital cities around the world.
General
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) is a European Union (EU) agency with
regulatory and executive tasks in the field of civilian aviation safety. Based in Cologne,
Germany, the EASA was created on 15 July 2003, by the European Parliament and it reached
full functionality in 2008, taking over functions of the Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA).
The responsibilities of EASA include to conduct analysis and research of safety, authorizing
foreign operators, giving advice for the drafting of EU legislation, implementing and monitoring
safety rules (including inspections in the member states), giving type-certification of aircraft and
components as well as the approval of organizations involved in the design, manufacture and
maintenance of aeronautical products.
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland*
Ireland * These Countries participate in the
Italy activities of EASA under Article 66 of
Latvia the Basic Regulation and are members
Liechtenstein* of the Management Board without
Lithuania
Luxembourg
voting rights.
Malta
Netherlands
Norway*
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland*
United Kingdom
Before EASA
Prior to EASA being formed there was a European organization called the Joint Aviation
Authorities (JAA). This was an organization of various European states that standardized their
regulations, in accordance with the ICAO Annexes. Upon formation of EASA it was stated that
EASA would take over all functions of the JAA. By 2010 the JAA ceased to exist, however all of
the regulations produced by the JAA are incorporated into EASA regulations.
The JAA was dissolved in June 2009. Therefore; the JAA no longer exists, and all the Joint
Aviation Regulations (JARs) have been superseded by equivalent EASA Regulations.
The JAA was headquartered at Hoofddorp, North Holland. One difference between EASA and
JAA is that EASA has legal regulatory authority within the European Union (EU) through the
enactment of its regulations through the European Commission, Council of the European Union
and European Parliament, while most of the JAA regulatory products were harmonized codes
without direct force of law. Also, some JAA nations such as Turkey were outside the EU
whereas by definition, EASA is an agency of the EU and other nations adopt its rules and
procedures on a voluntary basis.
EASA is also responsible for assisting the European Commission in negotiating international
harmonization agreements with the 'rest of the world' on behalf of the EU member states and
also concludes technical agreements at a working level directly with its counterparts around the
world such as the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). EASA also sets policy for
aeronautical repair stations (Part-145 organizations in Europe and the US – also known as Part
571 organizations in Canada) and issues repair station certificates for repair stations located
outside the EU (which permits foreign repair stations to perform work acceptable to the
European Union on EU aircraft). EASA has developed regulations for air operations, flight crew
licensing and non-EU aircraft used in the EU.
Help the Community legislature draw up common standards to ensure the highest
possible levels of safety and environmental protection;
Ensure that they are applied uniformly in Europe and that any necessary safeguard
measures are implemented;
Promote the spread of standards worldwide.
Take binding individual decisions by granting aircraft type certificates and by conducting
inspections and investigations;
Issue non-binding documents containing certification specifications, acceptable means of
compliance and guidance material (for use in the certification process) and present
opinions to the European Commission on the essential requirements and implementing
rules to be adopted.
EASA Structure
The National aviation authorities of the EU member states are known as EASA ‘Competent
Authorities’ (CAs). The Competent Authorities are responsible for administering and enforcing
the Rules and Regulations produced by EASA.
The CAs are also responsible for maintaining an individual register of aircraft for their state, and
a register of organizations (such as airline companies operating under an Air Operator
Certificate (AOC) situated in their territories.
The definition of the word ‘aircraft’ is found in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 as
follows:
‘aircraft’ means any machine that can derive support in the atmosphere
from the reactions of the air other than reactions of the air against the
earth’s surface
Aircraft used for carrying out military, customs, police, search and rescue, firefighting,
coastguard or similar activities or service. These are considered “government aircraft” and are
not operated or maintained under EASA Regulations.
Aircraft that have been in the service of military forces, unless the aircraft is of a type for
which a design standard has been adopted by the Agency;
Aeroplanes, helicopters and powered parachutes having no more than two seats, and a
maximum take-off mass (MTOM), of between 300 – 495 kg depending on type
Aeroplanes, having the stall speed or the minimum steady flight speed in landing
configuration not exceeding 35 knots calibrated air speed (CAS);
Single and two-seater gyroplanes with a maximum take-off mass not exceeding 560 kg;
Gliders with a maximum empty mass, of no more than 80 kg when single-seat or 100 kg
when two-seat, including those which are foot launched;
1. Interested parties in industry, which are subject to rules drafted by the EASA, are pivotal
in ensuring the success of civil aviation safety standards by assisting in the drafting and
correct application of European Community and EASA rules. European aviation
authorities perform a critical role in assisting the EASA with the performance of its core
rulemaking, certification, and standardization functions.
Of particular note at this time is the imminent trilateral agreement between EASA, FAA
and Transport Canada to release to service components certified by these organizations
in each other’s country, without the Form 1 (or 8130-3) having a dual release
requirement.
4. Accident investigation bodies issue safety recommendations and analysis that guide the
agency’s safety strategy.
The drafting and approval of rules (“rulemaking”) is a lengthy process, and involvement of the
EU National Aviation Authorities (NAAs) is maintained throughout via its Advisory Group of
National Authorities (AGNA).
The Sub-section paragraphs can be recognized by the inclusion of the letters ‘A’ or ‘B’ as
appropriate in the paragraph number, such as 66.A.15, and 66.B.15.
Acceptable means of Compliance (AMC) illustrate a means, but not the only means, by which a
requirement contained in an EASA airworthiness code or an implementing rule of the Basic
Regulation, can be met. An applicant correctly implementing an AMC issued by EASA is
assured of acceptance of compliance. The soft regulations are established directly by EASA
itself.
The basic regulation establishes common essential requirements to provide for a high uniform
level of civil aviation safety. It establishes EASA Article 1 and annex ll defines those aircraft
(types and roles) not covered by this regulation.
The regulation has been amended by Commission Regulations (EC) No. 690/2009, (EU) No.
6/2013 and (EC) No. 1108/2009. The amended Regulation (EC) No. 216/2008 further
established regulations regarding:
Regulation (EU) No. 748/2012 contains Annex I - Part-21; the implementing rules for initial
certification of aircraft and environmental standards.
These are also known as “airworthiness codes” and are based upon (and in most cases are
identical to) the JAA codes which they replace.
Regarding on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and
appliances, and on the approval of organizations and personnel involved in these.
Consists of 4 Annexes:
To assist organisations and individuals to comply with this regulation Acceptable Means of
Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) is provided where applicable, relevant to the
appropriate annex paragraph.
Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) illustrate a means, but
not the only means, by which a requirement contained in an EASA airworthiness code or an
implementing rule of the Basic Regulation, can be met. An applicant correctly implementing an
AMC/GM issued by EASA is assured of acceptance of compliance.
As such published acceptable means of compliance / guidance material are not the only means
to show compliance, the applicant may decide to show compliance by other means. When so
doing it does not need to justify why an alternative is used, but the burden of proof that the
requirement is met relies entirely with it.
Part-66 was based on the older JAR system and the required training level followed the ATA
104 system. There are 3 levels of authorisation:
A significant difference between the US and the European systems is that in the United States,
aircraft maintenance technicians (Part-65 Airframe and Powerplant Mechanics) are permitted to
work under their own certificates and approve their own work for return to service. European
Part-66 certificate holders are required to perform their functions under the aegis of a Part-145
organisation for Transport Category and Large (MTOM>5700 kg) Airplanes. The Part-145
organisation in the EASA system has the authority to approve for return to service. Many non-
European countries have been moving toward the European approach, most notably Canada.
______________________________________________________
The Certification work also includes all post-certification activities, such as the approval of
changes to, and repairs of, aeronautical products and their components, as well as the issuing
of airworthiness directives to correct any potentially unsafe situation.
All type-certificates are therefore now issued by the EASA and are valid throughout the
European Union. It also carries out the same role for foreign organisations involved in the
manufacture or maintenance of such products. The EASA relies on national aviation authorities
who have historically filled this role and concludes contractual arrangements to this effect.
General
Each member state has a National Aviation Authority (NAA). Each NAA may or may not be a
fully Competent Authority of EASA, depending on each Authority’s capability. If a NAA is not a
fully Competent Authority, then the functions in which they are not competent, may be
contracted to the NAA of another Member State, or the EASA may perform these functions
directly.
The Member State is responsible for establishing their own National Aviation Authority. From a
general point of view, the National Aviation Authority has the following tasks:
The Member State plays an active role in assisting with the development of these policies and
regulations and has a close working relationship with the EC and other relevant bodies.
The Member States work very closely with EASA to implement and enforce the regulations in
their own State.
The Regulation and its four parts are integral to continued airworthiness. The following diagram
will assist in understanding how they interrelate.
Part-21
Flight Crew Part-147
Design, Manufacture and
Licensing Training Organisation
Certification of New
and Requirements
Products
Air Operations
Certification
Specifications
(CS)
Part-145 organisations require licensed engineers to carry out release to service functions.
These engineers are licensed in accordance with Part-66. To achieve the standards required by
Part-66, engineers have to attend training courses of various standards at Part-147 Approved
training schools.
Part-145 and Part-M organizations require liaison with Part-21 Design organizations to enable
repairs to be approved in accordance with Certification Specification as exemplified by CS-25
(Large Aeroplanes).
Finally, flight crews have an airworthiness responsibility under Part-M in that they can be trained
to carry out pre-flight inspections, which are a Part-M requirement.
If the Owner is operating the aircraft for commercial air transport; then he must hold an Air
Operators Certificate (AOC). In this case, the Part-M approval is issued in conjunction with the
issue of the AOC. The operator cannot have an AOC without an associated Part-M approval.
International Civil Aviation Organisation. Convention signed 1944, 1947 came into
being
European Union
4. When did the Agency take over the responsibility of rules and procedures for operations
and crew licensing?
2008
7. What is Regulation (EU) No. 1321/2014 concerned with and what are its 4 annexes
called?
Continuing Airworthiness
Annex I – Part-M
Annex II – Part-145
Annex III – Part-66
Annex IV – Part-147
Initial Airworthiness
Certification Specifications provide minimum technical standards for the design and
manufacture of aircraft, engines and propellers
9. The Implementing Rules (IR) contain the AMC and GM. What are the AMC and GM?
Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material are “soft laws” which
provide examples of how the regulations can be complied with
11. What Organisation approves a company under Part-M or Part-147 if that company’s main
place of business is outside the EU?
EASA directly
12. Which four former JAA members are now treated as members of EASA even though they
are not members of the EU?
13. Which organisation can issue approval for design of a product or type certification of a
new aircraft in EU states?
Only EASA
16. Where will you find a list of aircraft types that do not need to be maintained under EC
regulations?
18. State two certificates that are issued under Implementing Rules of Part 21.
Type Certificate
Certificate of Airworthiness
Noise Certificate
Airworthiness Codes
1321/2014
25. What Implementing Rule is applicable to the operation of aircraft for Commercial Air
Transport, and what was it previously known as?
Regulation (EU) No. 965/2012
AIR-OPS
Previously EU-OPS / JAR-OPS
ICAO
Module 10
Licence Category A, B1 and B2
Aviation Legislation
LEVEL 1
A familiarisation with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and
examples.
The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
LEVEL 2
A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
An ability to apply that knowledge.
Objectives:
The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
LEVEL 3
A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive
manner.
Objectives:
The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects.
The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics
describing the subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's
instructions.
The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
Introduction____________________________________________________________________ 8
General ________________________________________________________________________________8
Age Limitation ___________________________________________________________________________8
Some Definitions _________________________________________________________________________8
Line Maintenance and Base Maintenance____________________________________________ 9
Categories of Licence __________________________________________________________ 10
Category A Licence ______________________________________________________________________10
Category B Licence ______________________________________________________________________11
Category C Licence______________________________________________________________________12
Group Ratings of Aircraft Maintenance Licence ________________________________________________13
Application for a Licence __________________________________________________________________14
Certification Privileges __________________________________________________________ 15
Category A - Aircraft Maintenance Licence ___________________________________________________16
Category B1 - Aircraft Maintenance Licence __________________________________________________16
Category B2 - Aircraft Maintenance Licence __________________________________________________16
Category B3 - Aircraft Maintenance Licence __________________________________________________16
Category C - Aircraft Maintenance Licence ___________________________________________________17
Limitation of Privileges ___________________________________________________________________17
Medical Fitness _________________________________________________________________________17
The Basic Licence - Knowledge Requirements ______________________________________ 18
Category A, B1, B2 and B3 Knowledge Requirements __________________________________________18
Category C Knowledge Requirements _______________________________________________________18
Modular Examinations to be Passed ________________________________________________________18
How many Questions on the Exams? ________________________________________________________20
Experience Requirements _______________________________________________________ 22
Category A, B1.2, B1.4 and B3 Experience Requirements: _______________________________________22
Category B2, B1.1 and B1.3 Experience Requirements: _________________________________________23
Category C Experience Requirements: ______________________________________________________25
Extension to the Basic Licence _____________________________________________________________25
Part-66 Licence Extension Experience Requirements ___________________________________________26
Support Staff ___________________________________________________________________________26
Type Training for B1, B2, B3 or C Category Licences ___________________________________________28
Part-147 Approved Type Course ___________________________________________________________28
Type Experience ________________________________________________________________________29
Type Training for Category C Licence Holders _________________________________________________31
Category B3 Type Endorsement ____________________________________________________________31
Evidence of Qualification ________________________________________________________ 31
Examination by the Competent Authority _____________________________________________________32
Examination by an Approved Part-147 Organisation ____________________________________________32
The Procedure for Licence Application ____________________________________________ 33
The Language of the Licence ______________________________________________________________34
After You Receive Your Licence ____________________________________________________________34
Renewal ______________________________________________________________________________34
The Pages of the Licence ________________________________________________________ 35
Worksheet 10.2 ________________________________________________________________ 41
Part-66________________________________________________________________________________43
Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) to Part-66 ____________________________________________47
Guidance Material (GM) to Part-66 __________________________________________________________48
https://easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/decision_ED_2003_19_RM.pdf
You are strongly encouraged to study this document (including the AMC/GM) in detail. The
following is a summary of the salient points only. On any Module 10 examination, you are likely
to be examined on all details of the Part-66 including its AMC and GM.
Introduction
General
Part-66 is the name given to Annex III of Regulation (EU) 1321/2014 and it defines the licensing
of aircraft maintenance staff who are employed by a Part-145 or Part-M (Subpart F)
organisation. Part-66 came into force on 29 November 2003, but various derogations allowed
the regulation not to be mandatory until September 2006 for large aircraft (MTOM > 5700 kg), or
September 2008 for light aircraft (MTOM< 5700 kg).
All staff issuing Certificates of Release to Service (CRS) in accordance with Part-145.A.50 and
a Part-M (Subpart F) are required to be licenced in accordance with Part-66; they will hold a
Basic Licence with an aircraft Type/Task endorsement. In addition; there are experience and
age requirements.
An aircraft maintenance engineer can hold multiple categories of licence and of multiple types.
Age Limitation
The minimum age to apply for a Part-66 licence is 18 years. However, the experience and
examinations can be gained prior to this age. The competent authority may impose their own
minimum age limit for taking exams. The minimum age to certify with a licence is 21 years (this
is specified in Part-145).
Some Definitions
Categories of licence: The types of licence that can be held, with respect to the broad
levels of work that can be performed and certified.
Certification Privileges of licence holder: The level and category of work that a licence
holder may certify by issuance of a Certificate of Release to Service (CRS). This includes
a breakdown by type and/or specific task, the latter being endorsed on the licence itself.
Experience Requirements: The practical experience gained prior to the application for a
licence which the applicant must document and have independently verified.
Knowledge Requirements: The level of theoretical knowledge gained prior to the
application for a licence, which the applicant must gain by examination.
Line maintenance is any maintenance that is carried out before flight to ensure that the aircraft
is fit for the intended flight. It may include:
trouble shooting;
defect rectification;
component replacement with use of external test equipment if required. Component
replacement may include components such as engines and propellers;
scheduled maintenance and/or checks including visual inspections that will detect
obvious unsatisfactory conditions/discrepancies but do not require extensive in depth
inspection. It may also include internal structure, systems and powerplant items which
are visible through quick opening access panels/doors;
minor repairs and modifications which do not require extensive disassembly and can be
accomplished by simple means;
for temporary or occasional cases (such as to comply with an airworthiness directives or
a service bulletins) the quality manager may accept base maintenance tasks to be
performed by a line maintenance organisation provided all requirements are fulfilled. The
Member State will prescribe the conditions under which these tasks may be performed.
Base maintenance is any maintenance tasks falling outside the criteria described above.
The titles adopted by each competent authority may differ from those shown above, to reflect
titles used in the national language for the above functions but the designators A, B1, B2, B3
and C are required by 66.A.20.
Category A Licence
The Category A licence is further divided into 4 sub categories as follows:
A1 Aeroplanes – Turbine
A2 Aeroplanes – Piston
A3 Helicopters – Turbine
A4 Helicopters – Piston
The wider privileges of the Category B licence and the role of the Technician in defect diagnosis
and rectification and system inspection require a more detailed knowledge than that for
Category A. This requires a longer period of experience and examination at a higher level than
for Category A.
Note: Compass compensation and adjustment certification privileges are contained within a
Category B1 licence.
Note: A Part-66 B2 licence does not automatically include any Category A licence authorisation
entitlement. No A-licence exists for avionic mechanics. However, provision is made to allow the
issue certificates of release to service following minor scheduled line maintenance and simple
defect rectification within the limits of tasks specifically endorsed on the certification
authorisation. This certification privilege is restricted to work that the licence holder has
personally performed in the maintenance organisation which issued the certification
authorisation and limited to the ratings already endorsed in the B2 licence.
Note: Compass compensation and adjustment certification privileges are contained within a
Category B2 licence.
Category C certifying staff may not carry out the duties of category B1 or B2, or equivalent
within base maintenance, unless they hold the relevant B1 or B2 category and have passed
type training corresponding to the relevant B1 or B2 category.
During Base maintenance, the Category B1, B2 and B3 act as support staff for the Category C
licenced engineer.
Limitation of Privileges
The holder of an aircraft maintenance licence may not exercise certification privileges unless:
In the preceding two-year period he/she has, either had six months of maintenance
experience in accordance with the privileges granted by the aircraft maintenance licence
or, met the provision for the issue of the appropriate privileges.
The level of knowledge should be such that the licence holder is able to:
− read and understand the instructions and technical manuals in use within the
organisation;
− make written technical entries and any maintenance documentation entries, which
can be understood by those with whom they are normally required to communicate;
− read and understand the maintenance organisation procedures;
− communicate at such a level as to prevent any misunderstanding when exercising
certification privileges.
Medical Fitness
Certifying staff must not exercise the privileges of their certification authorisation if they know or
suspect that their physical or mental condition renders them unfit to exercise such privileges.
Examinations are conducted by most EASA competent authorities and also at appropriately
approved Part-147 training organisations. You do not need to have studied at the Part-147
training organisation in order to sit exams there.
Details of the modules required, the syllabus for each module and the knowledge level required
are found in Annex I to Part-66.
Some competent authority may operate a Credit system, whereby examinations passed which
form the knowledge requirement for a different licence category and/or other equivalent
technical qualifications may be acceptable to the competent authority. In such cases, each
application is usually considered and reviewed by the competent authority on an individual
case-by-case basis.
However, the content of their degree syllabus must have been assessed by the competent
authority regarding its suitability for this purpose.
Knowledge gained and examinations passed during previous experiences, for example, in
military aviation and civilian apprenticeships will be credited where the competent authority is
satisfied that such knowledge and examinations are equivalent to the Part-66 syllabus.
Applicants following the Graduate route for direct issue of Category C must still pass either the
Category B1 or B2 full examinations unless the degree course has been approved by the
competent authority for this purpose, or exemptions have been agreed as a result of the
assessment of the particular degree course.
Note that these are the MINIMUM number of questions based on the requirement of Part-66.
Examination centres may choose to use quantities of questions in excess of the required
minimum.
1. Mathematics
Category A: 16 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 20 minutes.
Category B1: 32 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 40 minutes.
Category B2: 32 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 40 minutes.
Category B3: 28 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 35 minutes.
2. Physics
Category A: 32 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 40 minutes.
Category B1: 52 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 65 minutes.
Category B2: 52 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 65 minutes.
Category B3: 28 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 35 minutes.
3. Electrical Fundamentals
Category A: 20 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 25 minutes.
Category B1: 52 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 65 minutes.
Category B2: 52 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 65 minutes.
Category B3: 24 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 30 minutes.
4. Electronic Fundamentals
Category B1: 20 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 25 minutes.
Category B2: 40 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 50 minutes.
Category B3: 8 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 10 minutes.
8. Basic Aerodynamics
Category A: 20 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 25 minutes.
Category B1: 20 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 25 minutes.
Category B2: 20 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 25 minutes.
Category B3: 20 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 25 minutes.
14. Propulsion
Category B2: 24 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 30 minutes.
17A. Propeller
Category A: 20 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 25 minutes.
Category B1: 32 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 40 minutes.
17B. Propeller
Category B3: 28 multi-choice and 0 essay questions, 35 minutes.
Experience Requirements
Category A, B1.2, B1.4 and B3 Experience Requirements:
For category A, subcategories B1.2 and B1.4 and category B3, the required minimum
experience is one of the following:
A “skilled worker” is a person who has successfully completed a course of training, acceptable
to the competent authority, involving the manufacture, repair, overhaul or inspection of
mechanical, electrical or electronic equipment. The training would include the use of tools and
measuring devices.
It should be noted that the Category A licence allows approval to release to service of only
those “tasks” for which the licenced mechanic is approved by the Part-145 Organisation. There
are no type approvals for Category A Basic Licence.
A “skilled worker” is a person who has successfully completed a course of training, acceptable
to the competent authority, involving the manufacture, repair, overhaul or inspection of
mechanical, electrical or electronic equipment. The training would include the use of tools and
measuring devices.
“Recent” Practical Maintenance Experience - All applicants must have gained at least one
year of experience on aircraft typical of the category or sub-category applied for. Of this one
year of experience, 50% must have been gained in the 12 months immediately prior to the
application. The remainder must have been gained in the 7 years before the application for the
licence.
Any aircraft maintenance experience gained outside a civil aircraft maintenance environment
(on military aircraft for example) is accepted when such maintenance is equivalent to that
required by this Part-66 as established by the competent authority. Additional experience of civil
aircraft maintenance shall, however, be required to ensure adequate understanding of the civil
aircraft maintenance environment.
The original licence must have been issued by the competent authority before any extension to
it will be considered. The additional experience duration can be found in Appendix IV to Part-
66.
The experience requirement will be reduced by 50% if the applicant has completed an approved
Part-147 course relevant to the subcategory.
From /
A1 A2 A3 A4 B1.1 B1.2 B1.3 B1.4 B2 B3
To
A1 - 6m 6m 6m 2y 6m 2y 1y 2y 6m
A2 6m - 6m 6m 2y 6m 2y 1y 2y 6m
A3 6m 6m - 6m 2y 1y 2y 6m 2y 1y
A4 6m 6m 6m - 2y 1y 2y 6m 2y 1y
B1.1 None 6m 6m 6m - 6m 6m 6m 1y 6m
B1.3 6m 6m None 6m 6m 6m - 6m 1y 6m
B1.4 6m 6m 6m None 2y 6m 2y - 2y 6m
B2 6m 6m 6m 6m 1y 1y 1y 1y - 1y
B3 6m None 6m 6m 2y 6m 2y 1y 2y -
Support Staff
By certifying individual tasks during base maintenance, the B1, B2 and B3 licenced staff, who
may or may not have certification privileges in their own right, are defined as Support Staff. The
category C licenced engineer can only certify the whole aircraft after the support staff have
certified the individual tasks required by the Scheduled Maintenance Inspection or “Check”.
For category B3, the relevant rating is ‘piston-engine non-pressurised aeroplanes of 2,000 kg
MTOM and below.
Note: There are additional requirements to be satisfied for authorisation issue. ‘Certification
Authorisation’ means the authorisation issued to certifying staff by the Part-145 Organisation
and which specifies the fact that they may sign certificates of release to service within the
limitations stated in such authorisation on behalf of the Part-145 organisation.
The endorsement of aircraft type ratings requires the satisfactory completion of the relevant
category B1, B2 or C aircraft type training.
The endorsement of the first aircraft type rating within a given category/sub-category requires
satisfactory completion of the corresponding On the Job Training, as described in Appendix III
to Part-66.
There are three types of experience that are deemed to be acceptable, as detailed below.
1 Experience gained during an approved Part-147 training course. This experience should
be detailed in logbook format and supported by the appropriate Part-147 certificate.
3 Any experience gained in an organisation that has been officially accepted by the
competent authority. This experience must again be detailed in logbook format or
worksheets, both of which must be suitably verified and certified.
Evidence of Qualification
Personnel exercising certification privileges as well as support staff shall produce their licence,
as evidence of qualification, within 24 hours upon request by an authorised person.
Pass the appropriate Basic Licence Modules and collect the pass-certificates See
Appendix I (The Syllabus) to Part-66.
Gain the experience required and record using a logbook. The competent authority may
specify a preferred logbook format although worksheets may be permitted. The logbook
or worksheets must be countersigned by an approved assessor from a Part-145 or Part-
147 organisation.
Some companies have delegated the screening of a licence application to approved Part-145
companies, therefore in the first instance it is desirable to check with your Part-145 quality
department, before you send it to the competent authority. In all instances the competent
authority issues the licence.
To apply for a type endorsement to the basic licence then apply on Form 19 as before attaching
a certificate showing a pass in the type course taken. This certificate must be issued by a
Part-147 organisation.
Renewal
The Part-66 Aircraft Maintenance Licence becomes invalid five years after its last issue or
amendment, unless the holder submits his/her Licence to the competent authority that issued it,
in order to verify that the information contained in the licence is the same as that contained in
the competent authority records.
The document may be printed in the English or the official language of the Member State
concerned, except that if the official language of the Member State concerned is used, a second
English copy is attached for any licence holder that works outside that Member State to ensure
understanding for the purpose of mutual recognition.
Each licence holder shall have a unique licence number based upon a National identifier and an
alpha-numeric designator.
The document may have the pages in any order and need not have some or any divider lines as
long as the information contained is positioned such that each page layout can clearly be
identified with the format of the example of the aircraft maintenance licence contained herein.
In either case above, the competent authority of the Member State will issue the document.
The Part-66 aircraft maintenance licence is recognised in all Member States and it is not
necessary to exchange the document when working in another Member State.
Part-66
1. To what current EU Regulation is Part-66 an annex of, and what annex is it?
4. A single turbine engine helicopter would belong to what Group of aircraft for the purpose
of maintenance licensing?
Sub-Group 2b
5. On what EASA Form is an aircraft maintenance licence application made, and to whom
is the application made?
Form 19
Competent authority
Following minor scheduled line maintenance and simple defect rectification within
the limits of tasks specifically endorsed on the authorisation.
9. Can a category A licence holder sign for work carried out by someone else?
10. Where will you find a list of typical tasks that a category A licence holder may be
authorised to perform and certify?
AMC to Part-145
11. A Category B1 licence holder issues certificates of release to service for what?
Yes
13. A Category B2 licence holder issues certificates of release to service for what?
No
16. Before a licence holder is authorised to exercise the privileges of their licence, they must
be in compliance with the requirements of what two other Implementing Rules?
6 months
18. What determines the language the Part-66 licence holder must speak?
19. Where would you find the syllabus for the modules you need to study for a Part-66
licence?
21. The relevant experience requirements for the following categories of licence are:
Category C
22. If someone wishes to “extend” a licence, where will they find how much experience in the
respective discipline is required?
Appendix IV of Part-66
24. The total amount of experience required is to be gained in what time period?
7 years
25. For what reason is a part-66 licence returned to the competent authority 5-years after
issue?
To verify that the information contained in the licence is the same as that
contained in the competent authority records
Sign it
27. Which licence category does not require any type rating endorsement?
28. Within what time period must licensed aircraft maintenance personnel provide evidence
of their qualification, if required to do so by an authorised person?
24 hours
Line
31. It is recommended that an applicant for a Category C licence has how much experience
of certifying as a B1 or B2 aircraft maintenance technician?
33. Appendix I to the Part-66 AMC has what title, and provides a list of what?
34. Appendix II to the Part-66 AMC has what title, and provides a list of what?
35. What are the titles for the following aircraft maintenance designators:
36. Category C certifying staff must meet the relevant level of knowledge for either of which
two licence category?
B1 or B2
37. Part-66 Appendix III type training levels are based upon what corresponding type training
levels?
ATA 104
Module 10
Licence Category A, B1 and B2
Aviation Legislation
LEVEL 1
A familiarisation with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and
examples.
The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
LEVEL 2
A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
An ability to apply that knowledge.
Objectives:
The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
LEVEL 3
A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive
manner.
Objectives:
The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects.
The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics
describing the subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's
instructions.
The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
General _________________________________________________________________ 10
Competent Authority _____________________________________________________ 10
Applicability ____________________________________________________________ 10
Application _____________________________________________________________ 11
145.A.10 – Scope _________________________________________________________ 11
Maintenance Organisation Exposition (MOE) __________________________________ 11
Line Maintenance and Base Maintenance _____________________________________ 12
Small Part-145 Organisations ______________________________________________ 12
Part-M Subpart F Maintenance Organisation___________________________________ 12
145.A.20 – Terms of approval _______________________________________________ 14
Classes and Ratings _____________________________________________________ 16
145.A.25 – Facility requirements ____________________________________________ 18
The Working Environment _________________________________________________ 18
Storage Facilities ________________________________________________________ 22
145.A.30 – Personnel Requirements _________________________________________ 24
The Accountable Manager _________________________________________________ 24
The Management Team___________________________________________________ 24
Maintenance Man-hour Plan _______________________________________________ 25
Personnel Competence ___________________________________________________ 25
Human Factors Training __________________________________________________ 26
Limited Certification Authorisations, and Aircraft Away from Base___________________ 27
145.A.35 – Certifying Staff and Support Staff __________________________________ 28
Definitions _____________________________________________________________ 28
Adequate Understanding of the Aircraft _______________________________________ 28
Recency and Continuation Training __________________________________________ 28
Records of Certifying Staff _________________________________________________ 29
Category A Certifying Staff ________________________________________________ 30
145.A.40 – Equipment, Tools and Materials ___________________________________ 32
Approved Tooling ________________________________________________________ 32
Calibration _____________________________________________________________ 32
145.A.42 Acceptance of Components ________________________________________ 33
Component Classification _________________________________________________ 34
Eligibility to be Fitted _____________________________________________________ 35
Locally Manufactured Parts ________________________________________________ 35
Life Expired Parts________________________________________________________ 35
145.A.45 – Maintenance Data _______________________________________________ 36
General _______________________________________________________________ 36
Examples of Applicable Data _______________________________________________ 38
CDCCL Modifications_____________________________________________________ 38
Work cards_____________________________________________________________ 38
Electronic Recording _____________________________________________________ 38
https://easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/decision_ED_2003_19_RM.pdf
You are strongly encouraged to study this document (including the AMC/GM) in detail. The
following is a summary of the salient points only. On any Module 10 examination, you are likely
to be examined on all details of the Part-66 including its AMC and GM.
General
An organisation can be approved to maintain Aircraft, Engines or Components or any
combination of the three. Annex ll to Regulation (EU) No. 1321/2014 - Part-145 (The Part)
details the requirements. This section will discuss these in the order that they are detailed in the
Part.
Aircraft maintenance organisations are approved for either Line or Base maintenance or both,
as appropriate.
Part-145 came into effect on 29 November 2003 for the maintenance of all EASA aircraft when
used for Commercial Air Transport (CAT), and from 28 September 2008 to include all large
aircraft regardless of use.
Competent Authority
For the purpose of Part-145, the competent authority is:
1. for organisations having their principal place of business in an EASA Member State, the
authority designated by that Member State, or;
2. for organisations having their principal place of business located in a country other than
an EASA state, EASA (The agency).
Applicability
Part-145 covers the approval of organisations engaged in the maintenance of aircraft or aircraft
components used for Commercial Air Transport, and applies to all large aircraft, regardless of
use. Part-145 and the Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material is available on
the EASA Website.
For the purpose of this regulation a “large aircraft” means an aeroplane with a Maximum Take-
Off Mass (MTOM) exceeding 5700 kg, or a multi-engine helicopter.
Application
Application for Part-145 approval is made to the Competent Authority on EASA Form-2. The
Organisation’s Maintenance Organisation Exposition (MOE) forms a part of the application.
145.A.10 – Scope
Maintenance Organisation Exposition (MOE)
To be approved the organisation must submit to the Competent Authority a document known as
the Maintenance Organisation Exposition (MOE). The document contains full details of how the
AMO intends to comply with Part-145 and the classes and types of equipment it is applying for
approval to maintain.
Appendix II of Part-145 provides the breakdown of the Class and Rating system used for the
approval of maintenance organisations.
Line maintenance is any maintenance that is carried out before flight to ensure that the aircraft
is fit for the intended flight. It may include:
trouble shooting;
defect rectification;
component replacement with use of external test equipment if required. Component
replacement may include components such as engines and propellers;
scheduled maintenance and/or checks including visual inspections that will detect
obvious unsatisfactory conditions/discrepancies but do not require extensive in depth
inspection. It may also include internal structure, systems and powerplant items which
are visible through quick opening access panels/doors;
minor repairs and modifications which do not require extensive disassembly and can be
accomplished by simple means;
for temporary or occasional cases (such as to comply with an airworthiness directive or
service bulletins) the quality manager may accept base maintenance tasks to be
performed by a line maintenance organisation provided all requirements are fulfilled. The
Member State will prescribe the conditions under which these tasks may be performed.
Base maintenance is any maintenance tasks falling outside the criteria described above.
Note however that Category A1 aircraft and Category B1 and B3 (Gas Turbine Engines and
APUs) cannot be maintained under this scheme.
After approval has been granted by the Competent Authority, the Competent Authority will
award a Certificate of Approval to the Organisation.
or
The last three-digit number is a sequential number applied by the approving authority.
Details of approved classes and ratings can be found on Page-2 (the Approval Schedule) of the
EASA approval certificate, EASA Form-3.
Category B Class rating - Engines -Means that organisation may carry out maintenance on
an uninstalled engine or APU and components, only whilst such components are fitted to
engine/APU (unless AMM expressly permits removal to improve access for maintenance).
Category C Class ratings are by ATA Chapter, for example C7 is engine components. For the
complete listing of those components approved under this rating the company has a capability
list which is referred to in the MOE. Amendment to the capability list is the responsibility of the
Quality Manager.
For the full list of ratings see Appendix IV of Part-M, and Appendix II of Part-145 (the latter
referring back to Appendix IV of Part-M).
Office accommodation must be provided for the management of the planned work and certifying
staff so that they can carry out their designated tasks in a manner that contributes to good
aircraft maintenance standards. Aircraft maintenance staff should be provided with an area
where they may study maintenance instructions and complete maintenance records in a proper
manner.
The working environment including aircraft hangars, component workshops and office
accommodation is appropriate for the task carried out and in particular special requirements
observed. Unless otherwise dictated by the particular task environment, the working
environment must be such that the effectiveness of personnel is not impaired.
For example:
Temperatures must be maintained such that personnel can carry out required tasks
without undue discomfort.
Dust and any other airborne contamination are kept to a minimum and not be permitted
to reach a level in the work task area where visible aircraft/component surface
contamination is evident. Where dust/other airborne contamination results in visible
surface contamination, all susceptible systems are sealed until acceptable conditions are
re-established. Aircraft hangar and component workshop floors should be sealed to
minimise dust generation.
Lighting is such as to ensure each inspection and maintenance task can be carried out
in an effective manner.
Noise shall not distract personnel from carrying out inspection tasks. Where it is
impractical to control the noise source, such personnel are provided with the necessary
personal equipment to stop excessive noise causing distraction during inspection tasks.
The working environment for line maintenance is such that the particular maintenance or
inspection task can be carried out without undue distraction. Therefore where the working
environment deteriorates to an unacceptable level in respect of temperature, moisture, hail, ice,
snow, wind, light, dust/other airborne contamination, the particular maintenance or inspection
tasks must be suspended until satisfactory conditions are re-established.
.
Protection from the weather elements relates to the normal prevailing local weather elements
that are expected throughout any twelve month period. Aircraft hangar and component
workshop structures should prevent the ingress of rain, hail, ice, snow, wind and dust etc.
For line maintenance of aircraft, hangars are not essential but it is recommended that access to
hangar accommodation be demonstrated for usage during inclement weather for minor
scheduled work and lengthy defect rectification.
Aircraft maintenance staff should be provided with an area where they may study maintenance
instructions and complete maintenance records in a proper manner.
Storage racks should be strong enough to hold aircraft components and provide sufficient
support for large aircraft components such that the component is not distorted during storage.
All aircraft components, wherever practicable, should remain packaged in protective material to
minimise damage and corrosion during storage.
Note that as the Accountable Manager signs the front page of the Exposition he does not
require to be approved by the EASA Form 4 procedure. However on receipt of an exposition the
competent authority can refuse to accept an Accountable Manager if there is evidence of
unacceptable performance in a previous position.
With regard to the accountable manager, it is normally intended to mean the chief executive
officer of the approved maintenance organisation, who by virtue of position has overall
(including in particular financial) responsibility for running the organisation. The accountable
manager may be the accountable manager for more than one organisation and is not required
to be necessarily knowledgeable on technical matters as the maintenance organisation
exposition defines the maintenance standards. When the accountable manager is not the chief
executive officer the competent authority will need to be assured that such an accountable
manager has direct access to chief executive officer and has a sufficiency of ‘maintenance
funding’ allocation.
all of whom should report to the accountable manager except in small Part-145 organisation
where any one manager may also be the accountable manager, as determined by the
competent authority, he/she may also be the line maintenance manager or the workshop
manager.
The Base Maintenance Manager is responsible for ensuring that all maintenance required to
be carried out in the hangar, plus any defect rectification carried out during base maintenance,
is carried out to the design and quality standards specified in Part-145. The base maintenance
The Workshop Manager is responsible for ensuring that all work on aircraft components is
carried out to the standards specified in Part-145 and also responsible for any corrective action
resulting from the quality compliance monitoring.
The Quality Manager has the responsibility for monitoring the Organisation’s continued
compliance with Part-145. This process includes the associated feedback system. The
appointed person shall have direct access to the Accountable Manager to ensure that the
Accountable Manager is kept properly informed on quality and compliance matters.
Personnel Competence
The organisation shall establish and control the competence of personnel involved in any
maintenance, management and/or quality audits in accordance with a procedure and to a
standard agreed by the competent authority. In addition to the necessary expertise related to
the job function, competence must include an understanding of the application of human factors
and human performance issues appropriate to that person's function in the organisation.
The organisation shall ensure that personnel who carry out and/or control a continued
airworthiness non-destructive test of aircraft structures and/or components are appropriately
qualified for the particular non-destructive test in accordance with the European or equivalent
Standard recognised by the Agency. Personnel who carry out any other specialised task must
be appropriately qualified in accordance with officially recognised Standards. An exception to
the above however is that a person qualified in Part-66 category B1 or B3 may carry out and/or
control colour contrast dye penetrant tests.
The AMC to Part-145 details a list of maintenance tasks which a Category A Part-66 line
maintenance mechanic can gain approval for.
In respect to the understanding of the application of human factors and human performance
issues, maintenance, management, and quality audit personnel should be assessed for the
need to receive Initial human factors training, but in any case all maintenance, management,
and quality audit personnel should receive human factors continuation training. This should
concern to a minimum:
Initial human factors training should cover all the topics of the training syllabus specified in GM
to Part-145.A.30 either as a dedicated course or else integrated within other training. The
syllabus may be adjusted to reflect the particular nature of the organisation. The syllabus may
also be adjusted to meet the particular nature of work for each function within the organisation.
For example:
small organisations not working in shifts may cover in less depth subjects related to
teamwork and communication,
planners may cover in more depth the scheduling and planning objective of the syllabus
and in less depth the objective of developing skills for shift working.
Initial training should be provided to personnel within 6 months of joining the maintenance
organisation, but temporary staff may need be trained shortly after joining the organisation to
cope with the duration of employment.
Personnel being recruited from another maintenance organisation approved under Part-145 and
temporary staff should be assessed for the need to receive any additional Human factors
training to meet the new maintenance organisation’s approved under Part-145 human factors
training standard.
The purpose of human factors continuation training is primarily to ensure that staff remain
current in terms of human factors and also to collect feedback on human factors issues.
Consideration should be given to the possibility that such training has the involvement of the
quality department. There should be a procedure to ensure that feedback is formally passed
from the trainers to the quality department to initiate action where necessary.
The Human factors training procedures should be specified in the maintenance organisation
exposition.
In the case of aircraft operating away from a supported location the organisation may issue a
limited certification authorisation to the commander and/or the flight engineer on the basis of the
flight crew licence held subject to being satisfied that sufficient practical training has been
carried out to ensure that the commander or flight engineer can accomplish the specified task to
the required standard. The provisions of this are detailed in an exposition procedure.
In the following unforeseen cases, where an aircraft is grounded at a location other than the
main base where no appropriate certifying staff are available, the organisation contracted to
provide maintenance support may issue a one-off certification authorisation:
All such cases must be reported to the competent authority within seven days of the issuance of
such certification authorisation. The organisation issuing the one-off authorisation shall ensure
that any such maintenance that could affect flight safety is re-checked by an appropriately
approved organisation.
Definitions
‘Support staff’ means those staff holding a Part-66 aircraft maintenance licence in
category B1, B2 and/or B3 with the appropriate aircraft ratings, working in a base
maintenance environment while not necessarily holding certification privileges.
The organisation should hold copies of all documents that attest to qualification, and to recent
experience.
This means they have worked in an aircraft or component maintenance environment and either
exercised the privileges of the Part-145 certification authorisation and/or actually carried out
maintenance on at least some of the aircraft type systems specified in the authorisation.
The organisation must ensure that all certifying staff and Support Staff receive sufficient
continuation training in each 2 year period to ensure that such certifying staff have up-to-date
knowledge of relevant technology, organisation, procedures and human factor issues.
Continuation training should be a two way process to ensure feedback on procedures, human
factors and technical knowledge and that the organisation receives feedback on the adequacy
of its procedures related to the Organisation’s relevant quality audit findings.
In many cases the continuation training will reinforce the need to follow procedures and ensure
that incomplete or incorrect procedures are identified to the company in order that they can be
corrected. This does not preclude the possible need to carry out a quality audit of such
procedures.
The method of training is intended to be a flexible process and could, for example, include a
Part-147 continuation training course, aeronautical college courses, internal short duration
courses, seminars, etc. The elements, general content and length of such training should be
specified in the maintenance organisation exposition unless such training is undertaken by an
organisation approved under Part-147 when such details may be specified under the approval
and cross referenced in the maintenance organisation exposition.
the details of any aircraft maintenance licence held under Annex III (Part-66); and
all relevant training completed; and
the scope of the certification authorisations issued, where relevant; and
the particulars of staff with limited or one-off certification authorisations.
The organisation shall retain the record for at least three years after the staff have ceased
employment with the organisation or as soon as the authorisation has been withdrawn. In
addition, upon request, the maintenance organisation shall furnish the staff with a copy of their
personal record on leaving the organisation.
The staff are given access on request to their personal records as detailed above.
The following minimum information as applicable should be kept on record in respect of each
certifying person or category B1 or B2 support person:
Name
Date of Birth
Basic Training
Type Training
Continuation Training
Experience
Qualifications relevant to the approval
Scope of the authorisation
Date of first issue of the authorisation
If appropriate - expiry date of the authorisation
Identification Number of the authorisation
The competent authority is an authorised person when investigating the records system for
initial and continued approval or when the competent authority has cause to doubt the
competence of a particular person.
The organisation shall provide certifying staff with a copy of their certification authorisation in
either a documented or electronic format.
Certifying staff shall produce their certification authorisation to any authorised person within 24
hours.
The minimum age for certifying staff and support staff is 21 years.
This training shall include practical hands on training and theoretical training as appropriate for
each task authorised. Satisfactory completion of training is demonstrated by an examination or
by workplace assessment carried out by the organisation.
Approved Tooling
Where the manufacturer specifies a particular tool or equipment, the organisation shall use that
tool or equipment, unless the use of alternative tooling or equipment is agreed by the competent
authority via procedures specified in the exposition.
Equipment and tools must be permanently available, except in the case of any tool or
equipment that is so infrequently used that its permanent availability is not necessary. Such
cases are detailed in an exposition procedure.
An organisation approved for base maintenance shall have sufficient aircraft access equipment
and inspection platforms/docking such that the aircraft can be properly inspected.
Calibration
The organisation shall ensure that all tools, equipment and particularly test equipment, as
appropriate, are controlled and calibrated according to an officially recognised standard at a
frequency to ensure serviceability and accuracy. A clear system of labelling all tooling,
equipment and test equipment is therefore necessary indicating to users that the item is within
any inspection or service or calibration time-limit, giving information on when the next inspection
or service or calibration is due.
Records of such calibrations and traceability to the standard used are kept by the organisation.
All such tools and equipment that require to be controlled in terms of servicing or calibration by
virtue of being necessary to measure specified dimensions and torque figures etc. should be
clearly identified and listed in a control register including any personal tools and equipment that
the organisation agrees can be used.
Inspection, service or calibration on a regular basis should be in accordance with the equipment
manufacturers' instructions except where the organisation can show by results that a different
time period is appropriate in a particular case.
Misrepresentation of the status of components and the practice of making such items
appear serviceable have resulted in the use of unsalvageable non-conforming
components. Therefore organisations disposing of unsalvageable aircraft components
should consider the possibility of such components later being misrepresented and sold
as serviceable components. Caution should be exercised to ensure that unsalvageable
components are disposed of in a manner that does not allow them to be returned to
service.
d. Standard parts used on an aircraft, engine, propeller or other aircraft component when
specified in the manufacturer's illustrated parts catalogue and/or the maintenance data.
e. Material, both raw and consumable used in the course of maintenance when the
organisation is satisfied that the material meets the required specification and has
appropriate traceability. All material must be accompanied by documentation clearly
relating to the particular material and containing a ‘conformity to specification’ statement
plus both the manufacturing and supplier source.
Examples of fabrication under the scope of a Part-145 approval can include, but are not limited
to the following:
All the above fabricated parts, should be in accordance with data provided in overhaul or repair
manuals, modification schemes and service bulletins, drawings or otherwise approved by the
competent authority.
Note: It is not acceptable to fabricate any item to pattern unless an engineering drawing of the
item is produced which includes any necessary fabrication processes and which is acceptable
to the competent authority.
Items fabricated by an organisation approved under Part-145 may only be used by that
organisation in the course of overhaul, maintenance, modifications, or repair of aircraft or
components undergoing work within its own facility.
The permission to fabricate does not constitute approval for manufacture, or to supply externally
and the parts do not qualify for certification on EASA Form-1.
Fabrication of parts, modification kits etc. for onward supply and/or sale may not be conducted
by an organisation approved under Part-145.
Modifications are specifically mentioned as these are not normally covered by maintenance or
repair manuals.
If maintenance data is provided by an operator or customer, the organisation shall hold the data
while work is in progress.
The organisation may only modify maintenance instructions in accordance with a procedure
specified in the maintenance organisation's exposition. With respect to those changes, the
organisation shall demonstrate that they result in equivalent or improved maintenance
standards and shall inform the type-certificate holder of such changes. ‘Maintenance
Instructions’ for the purposes of this paragraph means instructions on how to carry out the
particular maintenance task: they exclude the engineering design of repairs and modifications.
The organisation shall have a procedure to report bad data (inaccurate, incomplete or
ambiguous) to the author of the data.
AMM/CMM/WDM/SRM
Service Bulletins - SB
Service Information Letters
Illustrated Parts Catalogues
Drawings
Standard Practices Manuals
Structural Repair Manuals
Wiring Diagram Manuals
Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
Airworthiness Notices
Part-145 Company Exposition & Procedures (MOE)
Work orders.
CDCCL Modifications
Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL) are airworthiness limitations.
Any modification of the maintenance instructions linked to CDCCL constitutes an aircraft
modification that should be approved in accordance with Part-21.
Work-cards
The Organisation must provide a common work-card or worksheet system for use throughout all
relevant parts of the organisation by transcribing the maintenance data onto such work-cards, or
make precise reference to the particular maintenance data.
It shall transcribe complex tasks onto work-cards and sub divide into clear stages to enable a
record of accomplishment of the complete maintenance task.
Electronic Recording
Work cards may be computer generated, in that case the database must be protected against
deterioration, and there must be adequate safeguards against unauthorised alteration.
A back-up electronic database which must be updated within 24-hours of any entry made to the
main electronic database.
The Organisation must ensure that all applicable maintenance data is readily available for use
when required by maintenance personnel and that maintenance data controlled by the
organisation is kept up to date. A procedure must exist to ensure currency of data amendment
status.
Data must be available in close proximity to the aircraft being maintained. Where computer
systems are used the number of computer terminals should be sufficient in relation to the work
programme to enable easy access, unless the system can generate paper copies (sufficient
printers would then be required).
Scheduling the maintenance work ahead, to ensure that it will not adversely interfere with
other maintenance work as regards the availability of all necessary personnel, tools,
equipment, material, maintenance data and facilities.
During maintenance work, organizing maintenance teams and shifts and provide all
necessary support to ensure the completion of maintenance without undue time
pressure.
Shift/Task Handover
When shift or task handover are required, a procedure should define how relevant information is
communicated.
A formalized process for exchanging the information must be documented and contained within
the MOE (Company Procedures). A planned overlap of shifts and a place for handover is
required. In all cases the handover must be written and where possible verbal. The written
record is mandatory.
At any scheduled or unscheduled maintenance task carried out to a fuel system feature
classified as a Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL) and before release to
service, the maintenance records shall reflect that the correct configuration is maintained and
ensured. This should be done by the marking: “CDCCL task” on the CRS.
A Certificate of Release to Service is issued before flight at the completion of any maintenance.
It may be written on the Technical Log-book for line and base maintenance, or on a specific
form for heavy maintenance.
The AMC to Part-145 states that the CRS should contain the following statement:
“that the work specified except as otherwise specified was carried out in accordance
with Part-145, and in respect to that work the aircraft/aircraft component is considered
ready for release to service".
The CRS should relate to the Operator’s instructions or the aircraft maintenance programme
which itself may cross refer to a manufacturer’s or operator’s instruction in a maintenance
manual, service bulletin etc.
The date such maintenance was carried out should include when the maintenance took place
relative to any life or overhaul limitation in terms of date/flying hours/cycles/landings etc. as
appropriate.
The CRS may summarise extensive maintenance, and cross refer to the work pack containing
full details, dimensional information should be retained in the work pack record
New defects or incomplete maintenance work orders identified during the above maintenance is
brought to the attention of the aircraft operator for the specific purpose of obtaining agreement
to rectify such defects or completing the missing elements of the maintenance work order. In the
case where the aircraft operator declines to have such maintenance carried out, it may issue a
certificate of release to service within the approved aircraft limitations. The organisation shall
enter such fact in the aircraft certificate of release to service before the issue of such certificate.
When an organisation maintains a component for its own use, an EASA Form 1 may not be
necessary depending upon the organisation's internal release procedures defined in the
exposition.
When an aircraft is grounded at a location other than the main line station or main maintenance
base due to the non-availability of a component with the appropriate release certificate, it is
permissible to temporarily fit a component without the appropriate release certificate for a
maximum of 30 flight hours or until the aircraft first returns to the main line station or main
maintenance base, whichever is the sooner, subject to the aircraft operator agreement and said
component having a suitable release certificate but otherwise in compliance with all applicable
maintenance and operational requirements.
Such components must be removed by the above prescribed time limit unless an appropriate
release certificate has been obtained in the meantime.
The organisation shall provide a copy of each certificate of release to service to the aircraft
operator, together with a copy of any specific approved repair/modification data used for
repairs/modifications carried out
The organisation shall retain a copy of all detailed maintenance records and any associated
maintenance data for two years from the date the component was released. The revision status
of the data used should be recorded.
Records must be stored in a safe way with regard to fire, flood and theft. Computer backup
discs, tapes etc. must be stored in a different location from that containing the working discs,
tapes etc., in an environment that ensures they remain in good condition.
Where an organisation terminates its operation, all retained maintenance records covering the
last two years are distributed to the last owner or customer of the component or are stored as
specified by the competent authority.
Retention
The organisation shall retain a copy of all detailed maintenance records and any associated
maintenance data for three years from the date the aircraft or component to which the work
relates was released from the organisation.
The records must be stored in a manner that ensures protection from damage, alteration
and theft.
Computer backup discs, tapes etc. must be stored in a different location from that
containing the working discs, tapes etc., in an environment that ensures they remain in
good condition.
Where an organisation approved under Part-145 terminates its operation, all retained
maintenance records covering the last two years are distributed to the last owner or
customer of the respective aircraft or component or are stored as specified by the
competent authority.
Storage can be on a computer. Computer backup discs, tapes etc. must be stored in
a different location from that containing the working discs, tapes etc., in an
environment that ensures they remain in good condition
Reporting is done in a form acceptable to the competent authority as soon as practicable, but in
any case within 72-hours of the condition being found.
Examples of reporting:
The following are examples of what should be reported:
Structural cracks;
Distortion, corrosion or defect to primary structure;
Significant leak of hydraulic system;
Traces of burn of electrical systems;
Emergency system failure.
An Airworthiness Directive not carried out.
The aim of occurrence reporting is to identify the factors contributing to incidents, and to make
the system resistant to similar errors. An occurrence reporting system should enable and
encourage free and frank reporting of any (potentially) safety related occurrence. This will be
facilitated by the establishment of a just culture. An organisation should ensure that personnel
are not inappropriately punished for reporting or co-operating with occurrence investigations.
Reports are made as soon as practicable, but in any case within 72-hours.
The internal reporting process should be closed-loop, ensuring that actions are taken internally
to address safety hazards. Feedback to reportees, both on an individual and more general
basis, is important to ensure their continued support for the scheme.
The safety and quality policy must include a statement in the MOE committing the Organisation
to:
Critical Systems
The organisation shall establish procedures to minimise the risk of multiple errors and capture
errors on critical systems and that no person is required to carry out and inspect components of
the same type fitted to more than one system on the same aircraft during a particular
maintenance check. When only one person is available the organisation’s work card shall
include an additional stage for re-inspection of the work by this person after completion of all the
same tasks.
Procedures
Procedures are established to ensure that damage is assessed and modifications and repairs
are carried out using data approved by the Agency or by an approved Part-21 design
organisation, as appropriate.
Maintenance procedures should reflect best practice within the organisation. It is the
responsibility of all organisation’s employees to report any differences via their organisation’s
internal occurrence reporting mechanisms.
All procedures, and changes to those procedures, should be verified and validated before use
where practicable.
All technical procedures should be designed and presented in accordance with good human
factors principles. Procedures should be established to detect and rectify maintenance errors,
The following maintenance tasks should primarily be reviewed to assess their impact on safety:
Installation, rigging and adjustments of flight controls, installation of aircraft engines, propellers
and rotors, Overhaul, calibration or rigging of components such as engines, propellers,
transmissions and gearboxes.
Work by unauthorised personnel (for example temporary staff, trainee) should be checked by
authorised personnel before they sign-off. The grouping of tasks for the purpose of signing-off
should allow critical steps to be clearly identified.
CDCCL Tasks
The Maintenance Organisation should ensure that when carrying out a modification, repair or
maintenance, Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations are not compromised; this will
require the development of appropriate procedures where necessary by the maintenance
organisation.
Maintenance organisations can prevent adverse effects associated with wiring changes by
standardising maintenance practices through training, rather than by periodic inspection.
Training should be provided to end indiscriminate routing and splicing of wire and to provide
comprehensive knowledge of critical design features of fuel tank systems that would be
controlled by a Critical Design Configuration Control Limitation.
The exposition should contain information as applicable, on how the maintenance organisation
complies with Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL) instructions.
Quality System
The Part-145 approved maintenance organisation must establish a quality system that includes;
The primary objectives of the quality system are to enable the organisation to ensure that it can
deliver a safe product and that it remains in compliance with the requirements.
The independent audit is an objective process of routine sample checks of all aspects of the
organisation’s ability to carry out all maintenance to the required standards and includes some
product sampling (an objective overview of the complete maintenance related activities)
3-54 Module 10.3 Approved Maintenance Organisations
Turkish Technic Inc.
Rev.01 – 31 March 2016 Training Purpose Only © Copyright 2016
The audit is intended to complement the Part-145.50 (a) certifying staff inspection and should
include a percentage of random audits carried out on a sample basis when maintenance is
being carried out (overtime / nightshift).
It is recommended that procedure and product audits be combined by selecting a product, and
auditing all applicable procedures to ensure that the end result should be an airworthy product.
Product Sampling
The sample check of a product means to witness any relevant testing and visually inspect the
product and associated documentation. The sample check should not involve repeat
disassembly or testing.
For the purpose of the independent audit a product line includes any product under an approval
class rating as specified in the approval schedule issued to the particular organisation.
It therefore follows for example that a maintenance organisation approved under Part-145 with a
capability to maintain aircraft, repair engines, brakes and autopilots would need to carry out 4
complete audit sample checks each year.
An essential element of the quality system is the quality feedback system. The principal function
of the quality feedback system is to ensure that all findings resulting from quality audits are
properly investigated and corrected in a timely manner and to enable the Accountable Manager
to be kept informed of any safety issues and the extent of compliance with Part-145.
In a medium sized organisation (less than 500 employees), it is acceptable that audits be
conducted by competent personnel not responsible for the function, procedure or process.
In smallest organisation (less than 10 employees) such audits may be contracted out to another
Part-145 organisation.
The Accountable Manager shall hold regular meetings with senior staff to check progress on
rectifications. In large organisations such meetings may be delegated to the quality manager
subject to the accountable manager meeting at least twice per year with senior staff and
receiving at least a half yearly report on findings.
All records of audits are retained at least 2-years after the date of clearance of the finding.
The organisation shall provide the competent authority with a maintenance organisation
exposition.
The MOE may be electronically processed. Minor amendment may be approved through an
indirect approval. Indirect approval consists of delegated approval from the competent authority
to the Quality Manager of the approved organisation. The limits of indirect approval will be
contained in a MOE procedure.
Working under the quality system of an organisation appropriately approved under Part-145
(subcontracting) refers to the case of one organisation, not itself appropriately approved to Part-
145 that carries out aircraft line maintenance or minor engine maintenance or maintenance of
other aircraft components or a specialised service as a subcontractor for an organisation
appropriately approved under Part-145.
To be appropriately approved to subcontract the organisation should have a procedure for the
control of such subcontractors
145.A.95 – Findings
In the event that the competent authority has cause for concern about the product or the
continued compliance to Part-145 they can issue findings which are shown below.
A level 1 finding is any significant non-compliance with the Part-145 requirements which
lowers the safety standard and hazards seriously the flight safety.
A level 2 finding is any non-compliance with the Part-145 requirements which could
lower the safety standard and possibly hazard the flight safety.
After receipt of notification of findings, the holder of the maintenance organisation approval shall
define a corrective action plan and demonstrate corrective action to the satisfaction of the
competent authority within a period agreed with this authority.
When, during audits or by other means, evidence is found showing non-compliance with the
requirements of Part-145, the competent authority shall take the following actions:
For level 1 findings: immediate action is taken by the competent authority to revoke,
limit or suspend in whole or in part, depending upon the extent of the level 1 finding, the
maintenance organisation approval, until successful corrective action has been taken by
the organisation.
For level 2 findings: the corrective action period granted by the competent authority
must be appropriate to the nature of the finding but in any case initially must not be more
than three months. In certain circumstances and subject to the nature of the finding the
competent authority may extend the three month period subject to a satisfactory
corrective action plan agreed by the competent authority.
Action is taken by the competent authority to suspend in whole or part the approval in case of
failure to comply within the timescale granted by the competent authority.
The certificate shall either be pre-printed or computer generated but in either case the printing
of lines and characters must be clear and legible. Pre-printed wording is permitted in
accordance with the attached model but no other certification statements are permitted.
English and, where relevant, the language(s) of the Member State concerned are acceptable.
Completion of the certificate may be in English when it is used for export purposes, otherwise it
can be completed in the official language(s) of the Member State concerned.
The space remaining on the reverse side of the certificate may be used by the originator for any
additional information but must not include any certification statement.
The original certificate must accompany the items and correlation must be established between
the certificate and the items. A copy of the certificate must be retained by the organisation that
manufactured or maintained the item.
Where the certificate format and data is entirely computer generated, subject to acceptance by
the Member State, it is permissible to retain the certificate format and data on a secure
database.
Where a single certificate was used to release a number of items and those items are
subsequently separated out from each other, such as through a parts distributor, then a copy of
the original certificate must accompany such items and the original certificate must be retained
by the organisation that received the batch of items. Failure to retain the original certificate
could invalidate the release status of the items.
NOTE: There is no restriction in the number of copies of the certificate sent to the customer or
retained by the originator.
The certificate that accompanies the item may be attached to the item by being placed in an
envelope for durability.
This sub-part identifies the requirements to be met by an organisation to qualify for the approval
to certify the maintenance of small aircraft not used for commercial air transport.
Therefore a Part-M Subpart F maintenance organisation is one that has the approval for
particular types and groups of small aircraft.
The requirements mirror those contained in Part-145, however they have been adjusted to
reflect the complexity of the equipment and scale of the operations supported.
Application
Application for a Part-M Subpart F approval is made on EASA Form-2.
The Appendix IV to Part-M defines all classes and ratings possible under Part-M Subpart F.
a statement signed by the accountable manager to confirm that the organisation will
continuously work in accordance with Part-M and the manual at all times, and;
the organisation's scope of work, and;
the title(s) and name(s) of management person(s), and;
an organisation chart showing associated chains of responsibility, and;
a list of certifying staff, and;
a general description and location of the facilities, and;
procedures specifying how the maintenance organisation ensures compliance with
Part-M, and;
the maintenance organisation manual amendment procedure(s).
The maintenance organisation’s manual and its amendments are approved by the competent
authority.
Facilities are provided for all planned work, specialised workshops and bays are
segregated as appropriate, to ensure protection from contamination and the
environment.
Office accommodation is provided for the management of all planned work including in
particular, the completion of maintenance records.
Secure storage facilities are provided for components, equipment, tools and material.
Storage conditions shall ensure segregation of unserviceable components and material from all
other components, material, equipment and tools.
Storage conditions are in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions and access must be
restricted to authorised personnel.
A person or group of persons is nominated with the responsibility of ensuring that the
organisation is always in compliance with this Subpart. Such person(s) (the quality manager) is
ultimately responsible to the Accountable Manager. Such persons must be able to show
relevant knowledge, background and appropriate experience related to aircraft and/or
component maintenance.
The organisation shall have appropriate staff for the normal expected contracted work.
The use of temporarily subcontracted staff is permitted in the case of higher than normally
expected contracted work and only for personnel not issuing a certificate of release to service.
The qualification of all personnel involved in maintenance must be demonstrated and recorded.
Personnel who carry out specialised tasks such as welding, non-destructive testing/inspection
other than colour contrast must be qualified in accordance with an officially recognised
standard.
The maintenance organisation shall have sufficient certifying staff to issue certificates of release
to service for aircraft and components. They shall comply with the requirements of Part-66.
that certifying staff can demonstrate that in the preceding two-year period they have
either had six months of relevant maintenance experience or, met the provision for the
issue of the appropriate privileges; and,
that certifying staff have an adequate understanding of the relevant aircraft and/or aircraft
component(s) to be maintained together with the associated organisation procedures.
In the following unforeseen cases, where an aircraft is grounded at a location other than the
main base where no appropriate certifying staff is available, the maintenance organisation
contracted to provide maintenance support may issue a one-off certification authorisation:
All such cases must be reported to the competent authority within seven days of the issuance of
such certification authorisation. The approved maintenance organisation issuing the one-off
certification authorisation shall ensure that any such maintenance that could affect flight safety
is re-checked.
The approved maintenance organisation shall record all details concerning certifying staff and
maintain a current list of all certifying staff.
hold the equipment and tools specified in Part-M maintenance data or verified
equivalents as listed in the maintenance organisation manual as necessary for day-to-
day maintenance within the scope of the approval; and,
demonstrate that it has access to all other equipment and tools used only on an
occasional basis.
Tools and equipment is controlled and calibrated to an officially recognised standard. Records
of such calibrations and the standard used are kept by the organisation.
The organisation shall inspect, classify and appropriately segregate all incoming components.
Part-145
1. To what current Regulation is Part-145 an annex of, and what annex is it?
All large aircraft (>5700 kg MTOM) and all aircraft used for commercial air
transport (CAT)
4. An organisation based within an EU member state applies to whom for Part-145 approval?
6. Who is responsible for ensuring that all maintenance required is carried out to the
standards of Part-145?
9. For what task may the Commander and/or the Flight Engineer of an aircraft be issued with
a limited certification authorisation?
A person with not less than 5 years maintenance experience and holding a valid ICAO
licence
11. Within what time period must a report be made, after the case described in Q.10, and to
whom is the report made?
12. In any consecutive 2-year period, how much experience must Support Staff have had on
“relevant” aircraft?
6 months
14. How long does a certifying staff have, to produce his/her certification authorisation to any
authorised person?
24 hours
15. What is the minimum age of certifying staff and support staff?
21
16. What organisation(s) (if suitably approved) may carry out the task training for Category A
certifying staff?
Part-145 or Part-147
17. If work-cards and worksheets are stored electronically, within what period must the
electronic database be backed-up after any change made?
24 hours
Before flight, at the completion of any maintenance, when it has been verified that
all maintenance ordered has been properly carried out by the organisation in
accordance with the procedures specified in the MOE.
20. Under what conditions is it permissible to temporarily fit a component without the
appropriate release certificate?
When the aircraft is grounded at a location other than the main maintenance base.
Fitted for maximum 30 flight hours or until the aircraft first returns to the main
base, whichever is sooner, subject to operator agreement and component having a
suitable release document and otherwise in compliance with all applicable maintenance
and operational requirements.
21. For how long are detailed maintenance records to be kept by a Part-145 organisation?
22. Where an organisation approved under Part-145 terminates its operation, all retained
maintenance records covering the last two years is distributed to whom?
The competent authority, the state of registry of aircraft and the organisation
responsible for design of the aircraft or component
Any condition of the aircraft or component identified by the organisation that has
resulted or may result in an unsafe condition that hazards seriously the flight safety.
72 hours
Independent Audit
A quality feedback reporting system
Accountable manager
The document showing how the organisation intends to comply with Part-145.
Competent authority
It must work under the same quality system as the Part-145 organisation
Level 1
32. What are the 4 Rating categories that aircraft are classified into, for the purposes of Part-
145 and Part-M?
33. Maintenance of what items can be carried out by a Part-145 organisation approved with
the following class ratings:
Category A - Aircraft
Category B - Engines
Category C - Components
Category D - NDT
34. Part-M Subpart F is the requirements for organisations to maintain what aircraft?
Aircraft of 5700 kg MTOM and below, not used for commercial air transport
35. What is the purpose of the Accountable Manager in a Part-M Subpart F organisation?
Has corporate authority for ensuring that all maintenance required by the customer
can be financed and carried out to the standard required by Part-M
36. The certifying staff within a Part-M Subpart F organisation must be approved in
accordance with what regulation?
Part-66
37. On what EASA Form is the application for a Part-M Subpart F approval made?
Form 2
38. How many possible Ratings of Components are there for a Part-M Subpart F
organisation?
20
39. If an aircraft component is removed from an aircraft, maintained off the aircraft, then
refitted to the aircraft, how many times must a CRS be issued?
2 – one for the removal and refit, one for the maintenance off the aircraft
Trouble shooting
Defect Rectification
Component replacement
Scheduled maintenance and/or checks (which do not require extensive in-depth
inspections)
Minor repairs and modifications
Packaged
42. If there is a 25% or more shortfall of available man-hours during any calendar month, to
whom must this be reported?
43. Human factors continuation training should be of an appropriate duration in each two
year period in relation to what?
45. List (or summarize where appropriate) the current typical tasks permitted after
appropriate task training to be carried out by the category A for the purpose of the
category A issuing an aircraft certificate of release to service as part of minor scheduled
line maintenance or simple defect rectification.
48. When might an EASA Form 1 not be necessary when a component is maintained off the
aircraft?
Certifies that the work specified except here otherwise specified was carried out
in accordance with Part-145 and in respect to that work the aircraft/aircraft
component is considered ready for release to service.
No
To identify the factors contributing to incidents, and to make the system resistant
to similar errors
To enable the organisation to ensure that it can deliver a safe product and that
organisation remains in compliance with the requirements.
53. In what time period should an independent quality audit ensure that all aspects of Part-
145 are in compliance?
Every 12 months
By always ensuring that audits are carried out by personnel not responsible for the
function, procedure or products being checked
56. Can the quality feedback system be contracted out to another organisation?
No
To ensure that all findings resulting from the independent quality audits of the
organisation are properly investigated and corrected in a timely manner and to
enable the accountable manager to be kept informed of any safety issues and the
extent of the compliance of Part-145.
58. All records pertaining to the independent quality audit and the quality feedback system
should be retained for how long?
2 years after the date of clearance of the finding to which they refer.
59. Can a Part-145 organisation subcontract work to an organisation which is not Part-145
approved?
Yes, providing the sucntracted organisation works under the quality system of the
Part-145 organisation
60. How many Engine Rating subcategories exist for the purpose of Part-145 approval?
B1 Turbine
B2 Piston
B3 APU
Module 10
Licence Category A, B1 and B2
Aviation Legislation
LEVEL 1
A familiarisation with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and
examples.
The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
LEVEL 2
A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
An ability to apply that knowledge.
Objectives:
The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
LEVEL 3
A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive
manner.
Objectives:
The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects.
The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics
describing the subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's
instructions.
The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
Certification Statement
These Study Notes comply with the syllabus of EASA Regulation (EU) No. 1321/2014 Annex III
(Part-66) Appendix I, and the associated Knowledge Levels as specified below:
You are strongly encouraged to study this document in detail. The following is a summary of
the salient points only.
History
EU-OPS 1 was the transition into EC law of JAR-OPS 1, as specified by Regulation (EC) No
1899/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006, amending
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/1991 on the harmonisation of technical requirements and
administrative procedures in the field of civil aviation. EU-OPS was almost identical in content
to JAR-OPS. EU-OPS covered aeroplanes used for commercial air transport only. Helicopters
remained under the regulatory control of JAR-OPS 3, until the new Part-OPS was adopted in
2012.
The new EASA Regulatory System of Implementing Regulations (IRs) under Part-OPS is now
fully developed and was adopted as Regulation (EU) 965/2012 of the European Commission in
October 2012.
Part-OPS covers the air operation of all aircraft except tilt-rotor, airships and UAVs.
Purpose
This Regulation lays down detailed rules for commercial air transport operations with
aeroplanes and helicopters, including ramp inspections of aircraft of operators under the safety
oversight of another State when landed at aerodromes located in the territory subject to the
provisions of the ICAO Treaty.
The Regulation also lays down detailed rules on the conditions for issuing, maintaining,
amending, limiting, suspending or revoking the certificates of operators of aircraft engaged in
commercial air transport operations, the privileges and responsibilities of the holders of
certificates as well as conditions under which operations shall be prohibited, limited or subject to
certain conditions in the interest of safety.
Implementation
Regulation (EU) 965/2012 of the European Commission was adopted on 5 October 2012,
applicable from 28 October 2012. This regulation lays down detailed rules for commercial air
transport operations with aeroplanes and helicopters, including ramp inspections of aircraft of
operators under the safety oversight of another State when landed at aerodromes located in the
territory subject to the provisions of the Treaty.
This new regulation, which is generally known as IR-OPS (Implementing Rules – Operations),
replaces EU-OPS (Regulation (EU) 859/2008) and is intended to harmonise with ICAO Ops
provisions.
Contents
IR-OPS contains five annexes as follows:
Regulation Structure
“PART AUTHORITY” (AR) related to the oversight function of the Member States
and competent authorities in the subject covered by the regulation;
“TECHNICAL PARTS”
Each part is divided into SUBPARTS. The first SUBPART of a specific PART is usually
SUBPART GEN that details general requirements.
For example, looking for the requirement to be followed by a competent authority in order to
certify an operator:
EU-OPS and JAR-OPS 3 rules containing a safety objective have been retained as IR;
EU-OPS and JAR-OPS 3 rules unambiguously containing a means to comply with a
safety objective have been moved to AMC level;
In many instances, appendices of EU-OPS and JAR-OPS 3 were regarded as a means
of compliance and have been transposed as AMC;
In such cases where it was not possible to make a clear distinction between a safety
objective and a means to comply with a safety objective, the rule text has been retained
as IR;
In cases where the need for a more proportionate approach was demonstrated, EASA
proposed a rule text with a safety objective and an AMC;
EU-OPS / JAR-OPS 3 rule text of an explanatory nature has been transposed as GM;
notes have either been redrafted into AMC provisions, where treated as footnotes,
transposed as GM, or deleted if they did not provide sufficient added value;
Rules that contained provisions as “acceptable to the authority” have been consistently
redrafted through all Subparts as “the operator shall specify in the operations manual ...”.
The Agency adopted this approach in order to specify a defined procedure for how such
items should be brought to the attention of the competent authority.
.
The first SUBPART contains general requirements, which are applicable to all nine
specific approvals addressed in PART SPA;
The requirements for the nine specific approvals are each given in a separate
SUBPART.
Annex VIII – PART-SPO, covering specialised operations (i.e. Aerial Work) and commercial air
transport operations of sailplanes and balloons will be published soon.
This Subpart establishes the requirements to be followed by the competent authority or the
Agency when exercising its tasks and responsibilities regarding the performance of ramp
inspections of aircraft used by third country operators or used by operators under the regulatory
oversight of another Member State when landed at aerodromes located in the territory subject
to the provisions of the Treaty.
This section sets out the requirements for aircraft ramp inspections, including conduct of such
inspections and the qualification and training of ramp inspectors.
It also defines the categories of findings and the parameters of which an aircraft should be
grounded, based upon the findings of ramp inspections.
An Air Operator Certificate (AOC) is a certificate authorizing an operator to carry out specified
commercial air transport operations. (ICAO Annex 6)
An air operator certificate (AOC), sometimes alternatively described as an Air Operator Permit
(AOP), is the approval granted from a national aviation authority (NAA) to an aircraft operator to
allow it to use aircraft for commercial purposes. This requires the operator to have personnel,
assets and systems in place to ensure the safety of its employees and the general public. This
document will as a minimum detail the aircraft types which may be used, for what purpose and
in what geographic region.
The AOC is an ICAO (Annex 6) requirement. An AOC is referred to as an Air Carrier Operating
Certificate in the USA. In Europe, EASA sets out the requirements of an AOC in OPS-ARO but
the AOC is issued by the EASA competent authority of the member state.
"... prior to commencing commercial air operations, the operator shall apply for and obtain an air
operator certificate (AOC) issued by the competent authority."
An applicant for an AOC, or variation of an AOC, shall allow the authority to examine all safety
aspects of the proposed operation.
The competent authority shall issue the air operator certificate (AOC) when satisfied that the
operator has demonstrated compliance with the elements required in ORO.AOC.100.
Aerial surveying
Aerial spotting
Agricultural operations
Aerial photography
Aerial advertising
Fire fighting
Air ambulance or aeromedical
Flight Training
Charter
Public transport
Sufficient personnel with the required experience for the type of operations requested,
Airworthy aircraft, suitable for the type of operations requested;
Acceptable systems for the training of crew and the operation of the aircraft (Operations
Manual);
A quality system to ensure that all applicable regulations are followed;
The appointment of key accountable staff, who are responsible for specific safety critical
functions such as training, maintenance and operations;
Carriers Liability Insurance (for airlines) - Operators are to have sufficient insurance to
cover the injury or death of any passenger carried;
Proof that the operator has sufficient finances to fund the operation;
The operator has sufficient ground infrastructure, or arrangements for the supply of
sufficient infrastructure, to support its operations into the aerodromes requested.
The certificate is held by a legal person who resides in the country or region of application (for
EASA) International variations
the operator remaining in compliance with the relevant requirements of Regulation (EU)
No 216/2008 and itsImplementing Rules, taking into account the provisions related to the
handling of findings;
the competent authority being granted access to the operator to determine continued
compliance with the relevant requirements of Regulation (EU) No 216/2008 and its
Implementing Rules; and
the certificate not being surrendered or revoked
The operator shall provide the following information to the competent authority:
the official name and business name, address, and mailing address of the applicant;
a description of the proposed operation, including the type(s), and number of aircraft to
be operated;
a description of the management system, including organisational structure;
the name of the accountable manager;
the names of the nominated persons required by together with their qualifications and
experience; and
a copy of the operations manual.
a statement that all the documentation sent to the competent authority have been verified
by the applicant and found in compliance with the applicable requirements.
Flight Data Monitoring (FDM) programmes assist an operator to identify, quantify, assess and
address operational risks.
The operator shall establish and maintain a flight data monitoring system, which shall be
integrated in its management system, for aeroplanes with a maximum certificated take-off mass
of more than 27 000 kg.
The flight data monitoring system shall be non-punitive and contain adequate safeguards to
protect the source(s) of the data.
Data is obtained from the aircraft’s digital systems by a Flight Data Acquisition Unit (FDAU) and
routed to the crash protected Digital Flight Data Recorder (DFDR). In addition to this mandatory
data ‘stream ‘, a second output is generated to a non-mandatory recorder. This output is often
more comprehensive than that of the crash-protected flight recorder due to the increased
capacity of this recorder. Unlike the DFDR, this recorder has an easily removable recording
medium (hence the name - Quick Access Recorder - QAR), previously tape or optical disk,
today more often memory cards or even a wireless system that requires no physical removal of
media.
The MEL and any amendment thereto shall be approved by the competent authority.
The operator shall amend the MEL after any applicable change to the MMEL within the
acceptable timescales.
a preamble, including guidance and definitions for flight crews and maintenance
personnel using the MEL;
the revision status of the MMEL upon which the MEL is based and the revision status of
the MEL;
the scope, extent and purpose of the MEL.
Technical crew members in commercial air transport HEMS, HHO or NVIS operations shall only
be assigned duties if they:
Notwithstanding the above, for operations under visual flight rules (VFR) by day with other-than-
complex motor-powered aircraft taking off and landing at the same aerodrome or operating site
within 24 hours, or remaining within a local area specified in the operations manual, the
following documents and information may be retained at the aerodrome or operating site
instead:
noise certificate;
aircraft radio licence;
journey log, or equivalent;
aircraft technical log;
NOTAMs and AIS briefing documentation;
meteorological information;
notification of SCPs and special loads, if applicable; and
mass and balance documentation.
In case of loss or theft of documents specified above, the operation may continue until the flight
reaches its destination or a place where replacement documents can be provided.
The operator shall conduct operational checks and evaluations of flight data recorder (FDR)
recordings, cockpit voice recorder (CVR) recordings and data link recordings to ensure the
continued serviceability of the recorders.
The operator shall save the recordings for the period of operating time of the FDR, except that,
for the purpose of testing and maintaining the FDR, up to one hour of the oldest recorded
material at the time of testing may be erased.
The operator shall keep and maintain up-to-date documentation that presents the necessary
information to convert FDR raw data into parameters expressed in engineering units.
The operator shall make available any flight recorder recording that has been preserved, if so
determined by the competent authority.
CVR recordings shall only be used for purposes other than for the investigation of an accident
or an incident subject to mandatory reporting, if all crew members and maintenance personnel
concerned consent.
FDR recordings or data link recordings shall only be used for purposes other than for the
investigation of an accident or an incident which is subject to mandatory reporting, if such
records are:
used by the operator for airworthiness or maintenance purposes only; or
de-identified; or
disclosed under secure procedures.
Module 10.4 Air Operations 4-33
Turkish Technic Inc
© Copyright 2016 Training Purpose Only Rev.01 – 31 March 2016
Refuelling / defueling with passengers embarking, on board or disembarking
CAT.OP.MPA.195
An aircraft shall not be refuelled / defueled with Avgas (aviation gasoline) or wide-cut type fuel
or a mixture of these types of fuel, when passengers are embarking, on board or disembarking.
For all other types of fuel, necessary precautions shall be taken and the aircraft shall be
properly manned by qualified personnel ready to initiate and direct an evacuation of the aircraft
by the most practical and expeditious means available.
The commander shall only commence take-off if the aircraft is clear of any deposit that might
adversely affect the performance or controllability of the aircraft, and in accordance with the
AFM.
The commander shall only commence a flight or intentionally fly into expected or actual icing
conditions if the aircraft is certified and equipped to cope with such conditions.
If icing exceeds the intensity of icing for which the aircraft is certified or if an aircraft not certified
for flight in known icing conditions encounters icing, the commander shall exit the icing
conditions without delay, by a change of level and/or route, if necessary by declaring an
emergency to ATC.
General
During any phase of operation, the loading, mass and centre of gravity (CG) of the aircraft shall
comply with the limitations specified in the AFM, or the operations manual if more restrictive.
The operator shall establish the mass and the CG of any aircraft by actual weighing prior to
initial entry into service and thereafter at intervals of 4 years if individual aircraft masses are
used, or 9 years if fleet masses are used. The accumulated effects of modifications and repairs
on the mass and balance shall be accounted for and properly documented. Aircraft shall be
reweighed if the effect of modifications on the mass and balance is not accurately known.
The operator shall determine the mass of all operating items and crew members included in the
aircraft dry operating mass by weighing or by using standard masses. The influence of their
position on the aircraft’s CG shall be determined.
The operator shall establish the mass of the traffic load, including any ballast, by actual
weighing or by determining the mass of the traffic load in accordance with standard passenger
and baggage masses.
In addition to standard masses for passengers and checked baggage, the operator can use
standard masses for other load items, if it demonstrates to the competent authority that these
items have the same mass or that their masses are within specified tolerances.
The operator shall determine the mass of the fuel load by using the actual density or, if not
known, the density calculated in accordance with a method specified in the operations manual.
The operator shall ensure that the loading of its aircraft is performed under the supervision of
qualified personnel and traffic load is consistent with the data used for the calculation of the
aircraft mass and balance.
The operator shall comply with additional structural limits such as the floor strength limitations,
the maximum load per running metre, the maximum mass per cargo compartment and the
maximum seating limit. For helicopters, in addition, the operator shall take account of in-flight
changes in loading.
The operator shall specify, in the operations manual, the principles and methods involved in the
loading and in the mass and balance system that meet these requirements. This system shall
cover all types of intended operations.
Aircraft transferred from one EU operator to another EU operator do not have to be weighed
prior to use by the receiving operator, unless more than 4 years have elapsed since the last
weighing.
The mass and centre of gravity (CG) position of an aircraft should be revised whenever the
cumulative changes to the dry operating mass exceed ±0.5 % of the maximum landing mass or
for aeroplanes the cumulative change in CG position exceeds 0.5 % of the mean aerodynamic
chord. This may be done by weighing the aircraft or by calculation.
When weighing an aircraft, normal precautions should be taken consistent with good practices
such as:
Any equipment used for weighing should be properly calibrated, zeroed, and used in
accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Each scale should be calibrated either by the
manufacturer, by a civil department of weights and measures or by an appropriately authorized
organisation within two years or within a time period defined by the manufacturer of the
weighing equipment, whichever is less. The equipment should enable the mass of the aircraft to
be established accurately.
One single accuracy criterion for weighing equipment cannot be given. However, the weighing
accuracy is considered satisfactory if the accuracy criteria in the Table below are met by the
individual scales/cells of the weighing equipment used:
the dry operating mass of an individual aeroplane does not differ by more than ±0.5 % of
the maximum structural landing mass from the established dry operating fleet mass; or
the CG position of an individual aeroplane does not diff r by more than ±0.5 % of the
mean aerodynamic chord from the established fleet CG.
The operator should verify that, after an equipment or configuration change or after weighing,
the aeroplane falls within the tolerances above.
To add an aeroplane to a fleet operated with fleet values, the operator should verify by weighing
or calculation that its actual values fall within the tolerances specified here.
To obtain fleet values, the operator should weigh, in the period between two fleet mass
evaluations, a certain number of aeroplanes as specified in the Table below, where ‘n’ is the
number of aeroplanes in the fleet using fleet values. Those aeroplanes in the fleet that have not
been weighed for the longest time should be selected first.
The interval between two fleet mass evaluations should not exceed 48 months.
The fleet values should be updated at least at the end of each fleet mass evaluation.
Aeroplanes that have not been weighed since the last fleet mass evaluation may be kept in a
fleet operated with fleet values, provided that the individual values are revised by calculation
and stay within the tolerances above. If these individual values no longer fall within the
tolerances, the operator should determine new fleet values or operate aeroplanes not falling
within the limits with their individual values.
If an individual aeroplane mass is within the dry operating fleet mass tolerance but its CG
position exceeds the tolerance, the aeroplane may be operated under the applicable dry
operating fleet mass but with an individual CG position.
Aeroplanes for which no mean aerodynamic chord has been published should be operated with
their individual mass and CG position values.
They may be operated under the dry operating fleet mass and CG position, provided that a risk
assessment has been completed.
Defining and applying operational margins to the certified CG envelope in order to compensate
for the following deviations and errors:
Deviations of actual CG at empty or operating mass from published values due, for
example, to weighing errors, unaccounted modifications and/or equipment variations.
Deviations in fuel distribution in tanks from the applicable schedule.
Deviations in the distribution of baggage and cargo in the various compartments as
compared with the assumed load distribution as well as inaccuracies in the actual mass
of baggage and cargo.
Deviations in actual passenger seating from the seating distribution assumed when
preparing the mass and balance documentation. Large CG errors may occur when ‘free
seating’, i.e. freedom of passengers to select any seat when entering the aircraft, is
permitted. Although in most cases reasonably even longitudinal passenger seating can
be expected, there is a risk of an extreme forward or aft seat selection causing very large
and unacceptable CG errors, assuming that the balance calculation is done on the basis
of an assumed even distribution. The largest errors may occur at a load factor of
approximately 50% if all passengers are seated in either the forward or aft half of the
cabin. Statistical analysis indicates that the risk of such extreme seating adversely
affecting the CG is greatest on small aircraft.
Deviations of the actual CG of cargo and passenger load within individual cargo
compartments or cabin sections from the normally assumed mid position.
Deviations of the CG caused by gear and flap positions and by application of the
prescribed fuel usage procedure, unless already covered by the certified limits.
Deviations caused by in-flight movement of cabin crew, galley equipment and
passengers.
On small aeroplanes, deviations caused by the difference between actual passenger
masses and
standard passenger masses when such masses are used.
The operator should correct the dry operating mass to account for any additional baggage. The
position of this additional baggage should be accounted for when establishing the centre of
gravity of the aeroplane.
passenger mass may be calculated on the basis of a statement by, or on behalf of, each
passenger, adding to it a predetermined mass to account for hand baggage and clothing.
The predetermined mass for hand baggage and clothing should be established by the operator
on the basis of studies relevant to his particular operation. In any case, it should not be less
than:
4 kg for clothing; and
6 kg for hand baggage.
The passengers’ stated mass and the mass of passengers’ clothing and hand baggage should
be checked prior to boarding and adjusted, if necessary. The operator should establish a
procedure in the operations manual when to select actual or standard masses and the
procedure to be followed when using verbal statements.
When determining the actual mass by weighing, passengers’ personal belongings and hand
baggage should be included. Such weighing should be conducted immediately prior to boarding
the aircraft.
When determining the mass of passengers by using standard mass values, the standard mass
values in the Table below should be used. The standard masses include hand baggage and the
mass of any infant carried by an adult on one passenger seat. Infants occupying separate
passenger seats should be considered as children.
Holiday charter means a charter flight that is part of a holiday travel package. On such flights the entire
passenger capacity is hired by one or more charterer(s) for the carriage of passengers who are travelling,
all or in part by air, on a round- or circle-trip basis for holiday purposes. The holiday charter mass values
apply provided that not more than 5 % of passenger seats installed in the aircraft are used for the non-
revenue carriage of certain categories of passengers. Categories of passengers such as company
personnel, tour operators’ staff, representatives of the press, authority officials etc. can be included within
the 5% without negating the use of holiday charter mass values.
Spare fuses;
Independent portable lights;
An accurate time piece;
Chart holder;
First-aid kits;
Emergency medical kit;
Megaphones;
Survival and signalling equipment;
Sea anchors and equipment for mooring; and
Child restraint devices.
The number of spare fuses that are required to be carried shall be the higher of:
Operating lights
CAT.IDE.A.115
Aeroplanes operated by day shall be equipped with:
navigation/position lights;
two landing lights or a single light having two separately energised filaments; and
lights to conform with the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea if the
aeroplane is operated as a seaplane.
Aeroplane lighting
requirements are specified in
OPS-CAT
Aeroplanes with an
MCTOM of more than 5 700
kg shall be equipped at
each pilot station with a
means to maintain a clear
portion of the windshield
during precipitation
A means of indicating when the supply of power to the required flight instruments is not
adequate.
Whenever two pilots are required for the operation, an additional separate means of
displaying the following shall be available for the second pilot:
- Pressure altitude;
- Indicated airspeed;
- Vertical speed;
- Turn and slip;
- Attitude; and
- Heading.
turbine propeller powered aeroplanes with an MCTOM of more than 5700 kg or having
an MOPSC of more than nine; and
aeroplanes powered by turbo-jet engines.
Aeroplanes with an MCTOM of 5700 kg or less, having an MOPSC of more than nine, first
issued with an individual CofA before 1 April 1972 and already registered in a Member State on
1 April 1995 are exempted from being equipped with an altitude alerting system.
Module 10.4 Air Operations 4-47
Turkish Technic Inc
© Copyright 2016 Training Purpose Only Rev.01 – 31 March 2016
Terrain awareness warning system (TAWS)
CAT.IDE.A.150
Turbine-powered aeroplanes having an MCTOM of more than 5700 kg or an MOPSC of more
than nine shall be equipped with a TAWS that meets the requirements for Class A equipment as
specified in an acceptable standard.
The means to illuminate the formation of ice shall not cause glare or reflection that would
handicap crew members in the performance of their duties.
The CVR shall be capable of retaining the data recorded during at least:
the preceding two hours when the individual CofA has been issued on or after 1 April
1998;
the preceding 30 minutes for aeroplanes when the individual CofA has been issued
before 1 April 1998; or
The CVR shall start to record prior to the aeroplane moving under its own power and shall
continue to record until the termination of the flight when the aeroplane is no longer capable of
moving under its own power. In addition, in the case of aeroplanes issued with an individual
CofA on or after 1 April 1998, the CVR shall start automatically to record prior to the aeroplane
moving under its own power and continue to record until the termination of the flight when the
aeroplane is no longer capable of moving under its own power.
Data shall be obtained from aeroplane sources that enable accurate correlation with information
displayed to the flight crew.
The FDR shall start to record the data prior to the aeroplane being capable of moving under its
own power and shall stop after the aeroplane is incapable of moving under its own power. In
addition, in the case of aeroplanes issued with an individual CofA on or after 1 April 1998, the
FDR shall start automatically to record the data prior to the aeroplane being capable of moving
under its own power and shall stop automatically after the aeroplane is incapable of moving
under its own power.
data link communication messages related to ATS communications to and from the
aeroplane, including messages applying to the following applications:
- data link initiation;
- controller-pilot communication;
- addressed surveillance;
- flight information;
- as far as is practicable, given the architecture of the system, aircraft broadcast
surveillance;
- as far as is practicable, given the architecture of the system, aircraft operational
control data; and
- as far as is practicable, given the architecture of the system, graphics;
information that enables correlation to any associated records related to data link
communications and stored separately from the aeroplane; and
information on the time and priority of data link communications messages, taking into
account the system’s architecture.
The recorder shall use a digital method of recording and storing data and information and a
method for retrieving that data. The recording method shall allow the data to match the data
recorded on the ground.
The recorder shall be capable of retaining data recorded for at least the same duration as set
out for CVRs.
The requirements applicable to the start and stop logic of the recorder are the same as the
requirements applicable to the start and stop logic of the CVR.
The commander shall ensure that drugs are only administered by appropriately qualified
persons.
The oxygen supply referred to in (a) shall be calculated using an average flow rate of at least 3
litres standard temperature pressure dry (STPD)/minute/person. This oxygen supply shall be
sufficient for the remainder of the flight after cabin depressurisation when the cabin altitude
exceeds 8000 ft but does not exceed 15000 ft, for at least 2% of the passengers carried, but in
no case for less than one person.
There shall be a sufficient number of dispensing units, but in no case less than two, with a
means for cabin crew to use the supply.
The first-aid oxygen equipment shall be capable of generating a mass flow to each user of at
least 4 litres per minute.
At least one hand fire extinguisher shall be located in, or readily accessible for use in, each
galley not located on the main passenger compartment.
At least one hand fire extinguisher shall be available for use in each class A or class B cargo or
baggage compartment and in each class E cargo compartment that is accessible to crew
members in flight.
The type and quantity of extinguishing agent for the required fire extinguishers shall be suitable
for the type of fire likely to occur in the compartment where the extinguisher is intended to be
used and to minimise the hazard of toxic gas concentration in compartments occupied by
persons.
Aeroplanes shall be equipped with at least a number of hand fire extinguishers in accordance
with the following table, conveniently located to provide adequate availability for use in each
passenger compartment.
In the case of aeroplanes with an MOPSC of more than 200, an additional crash axe or crowbar
shall be installed in or near the rearmost galley area.
Crash axes and crowbars located in the passenger compartment shall not be visible to
passengers.
Such means are not required at overwing exits if the designated place on the aeroplane
structure at which the escape route terminates is less than 1.83 m (6 ft) from the ground with
the aeroplane on the ground, the landing gear extended, and the flaps in the take-off or landing
position, whichever flap position is higher from the ground.
Aeroplanes required to have a separate emergency exit for the flight crew for which the lowest
point of the emergency exit is more than 1.83 m (6 ft) above the ground shall have a means to
assist all flight crew members in descending to reach the ground safely in an emergency.
Megaphones
CAT.IDE.A.270
Aeroplanes with an MOPSC of more than 60 and carrying at least one passenger shall be
equipped with the following quantities of portable battery-powered megaphones readily
accessible for use by crew members during an emergency evacuation.
Aeroplanes with
passenger
emergency exit
sill heights of
more than 1,83 m
(6 ft) above the
ground shall be
equipped at each
of those exits
with a means to
enable
passengers and
crew to reach the
ground safely in
an emergency
In the case of aeroplanes with an MOPSC of more than 19, the emergency lighting system,
shall include:
two ELTs, one of which shall be automatic, in the case of aeroplanes first issued with an
individual CofA after 1 July 2008; or
one automatic ELT or two ELTs of any type, in the case of aeroplanes first issued with an
individual CofA on or before 1 July 2008.
one automatic ELT, in the case of aeroplanes first issued with an individual CofA after 1
July 2008; or
one ELT of any type, in the case of aeroplanes first issued with an individual CofA on or
before 1 July 2008.
An ELT of any type shall be capable of transmitting simultaneously on 121.5 MHz and 406 MHz.
landplanes operated over water at a distance of more than 50 NM from the shore or
taking off or landing at an aerodrome where the take-off or approach path is so disposed
over water that there would be a likelihood of a ditching; and
seaplanes operated over water.
Each life-jacket or equivalent individual flotation device shall be equipped with a means of
electric illumination for the purpose of facilitating the location of persons.
Aeroplanes operated over water at a distance away from land suitable for making an
emergency landing, greater than that corresponding to:
120 minutes at cruising speed or 400 NM, whichever is the lesser, in the case of
aeroplanes capable of continuing the flight to an aerodrome with the critical engine(s)
becoming inoperative at any point along the route or planned diversions; or
for all other aeroplanes, 30 minutes at cruising speed or
100 NM, whichever is the lesser, shall be equipped with the equipment specified below.
The ‘additional survival equipment’ specified above does not need to be carried when the
aeroplane:
remains within a distance from an area where search and rescue is not especially difficult
corresponding to:
- 120 minutes at one-engine-inoperative (OEI) cruising speed for aeroplanes capable
of continuing the flight to an aerodrome with the critical engine(s) becoming
inoperative at any point along the route or planned diversion routes; or
- 30 minutes at cruising speed for all other aeroplanes;
remains within a distance no greater than that corresponding to 90 minutes at cruising
speed from an area suitable for making an emergency landing, for aeroplanes certified in
accordance with the applicable airworthiness standard.
Headset
CAT.IDE.A.325
Aeroplanes shall be equipped with a headset with a boom or throat microphone or equivalent
for each flight crew member at their assigned station in the flight crew compartment.
Aeroplanes operated under IFR or at night shall be equipped with a transmit button on the
manual pitch and roll control for each required flight crew member.
The radio communication equipment shall provide for communication on the aeronautical
emergency frequency
121.5 MHz.
Reports of such occurrences shall be sent to the competent authority within 72 hours. Reports
shall include an initial analysis of causal factors and measures taken to prevent repeat
occurrences.
When height-keeping errors are recorded or received, the operator shall take immediate action
to rectify the conditions that caused the errors and provide follow-up reports, if requested by the
competent authority.
ETOPS
SPA.ETOPS.100
In commercial air transport operations, two-engined aeroplanes shall only be operated beyond
the threshold distance determined in if the operator has been granted an ETOPS operational
approval by the competent authority.
the aeroplane/engine combination holds an ETOPS type design and reliability approval
for the intended operation;
a training programme for the flight crew members and all other operations personnel
involved in these operations has been established and the flight crew members and all
other operations personnel involved are suitably qualified to conduct the intended
operation;
the operator’s organisation and experience are appropriate to support the intended
operation;
operating procedures have been established.
Prior to conducting an ETOPS flight, the operator shall ensure that an ETOPS en-route
alternate aerodrome is available, within either the operator’s approved diversion time, or a
diversion time based on the MEL generated serviceability status of the aeroplane, whichever is
shorter.
The operator shall specify any required ETOPS en-route alternate aerodrome(s) in the
operational flight plan.
Primary Maintenance
In the early days of aviation, maintenance programs were developed primarily by pilots and
mechanics. They assessed an aircraft’s needs for maintenance based on their individual
experiences and created programs that were simple and devoid of analysis.
The introduction of the airlines as a new method of transport demanded new regulations and
broader involvement of the regulatory authorities in maintenance requirements. During this era
not only were regulations put in place but programs began to be used to monitor reliability and
safety. The entry of the large jet aircraft (Boeing 707 and DC-8) in the 1950s focused public
attention on the need for safer and more reliable aircraft. The aircraft manufacturer became the
source of maintenance programme development. Time limitations were established for
maintenance and the entire aircraft was periodically disassembled, overhauled, and
reassembled in an effort to maintain the highest level of safety. This was the origin of the first
primary maintenance process referred to as Hard-Time (HT).
Hard-time Maintenance mandated that all components be taken out of service when they
reached a specified age, expressed as the number of operating flight hours, flight cycles,
calendar time, or other stress units since new or since last shop visit. Removed units were
routed to repair centres and effectively zero-timed, whereby the operating age was restored
zero by means of an overhaul.
In 1960, representatives from both the aviation authorities and the airlines formed a task force
to investigate the capabilities of preventive maintenance. Two major discoveries resulted from
their investigation:
Scheduled overhaul has little effect on the overall reliability of a complex equipment unless
the equipment has a dominant failure mode, and
There are many items for which there is no effective application for scheduled hard-time
maintenance.
The findings of the task force led to the development of a second primary maintenance process
defined as On-Condition (OC).
Example of an OC process is measurement of brake wear indicator pins; compare brake wear
condition against a specified standard or limit. Brake wear will vary considerably among
operators due to operational conditions, however the wear indicator pin on-condition check will
help attain near maximum usage out of each set of brakes.
That same year, representatives of the steering group developed “MSG-1 - Maintenance
Evaluation and Programme Development", which for the first time used a decision-logic diagram
to develop the scheduled maintenance programme for the new Boeing 747 aircraft. Both hard-
time and on-condition processes were used for development of the aircraft’s routine
maintenance tasks.
In 1970, MSG-1 was updated to MSG-2 to make it applicable for later generation aircraft (L-
1011 and DC-10), and at the same time the methodology introduced a third primary
maintenance process defined as Condition-Monitoring (CM).
As long as the trend data remain inside the acceptable level, any variation is considered to be
normal. When the trend line intersects the “unacceptable” limit, removal of the unit is required to
prevent a failure in the future.
MSG-2 decision logic was subsequently used to develop scheduled maintenance programs for
the aircraft of the 1970s. Maintenance tasks were derived from one of three processes:
Hard-Time,
On-Condition, and
Condition-Monitoring
In 1979, the Air Transport Association (ATA) task force sought to improve on MSG-2 to address
a new generation of advanced technology aircraft (Boeing 757 and 767). Additionally, the task
force identified a number of shortcomings in MSG-2 decision logic, key among them:
MSG-2 did not differentiate between maintenance being done for safety reasons versus
economic reasons.
An MSG-2 programme became very unwieldy and difficult to manage because it required so
many components to be individually tracked.
MSG-2 did not effectively deal with the increased complexity of aircraft systems.
4-76 Module 10.4 Air Operations
Turkish Technic Inc
Rev.01 – 31 March 2016 Training Purpose Only © Copyright 2016
Module 10.4 Air Operations 4-77
Turkish Technic Inc
© Copyright 2016 Training Purpose Only Rev.01 – 31 March 2016
MSG-2 did not address regulations related to damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation of
structures; these are currently accounted for in Corrosion Prevention and Control Programs
(CPCP) and requirements mandated through an Aging Aircraft maintenance program.
The work of the ATA task force led to the development of a new, task-oriented, maintenance
process defined as MSG-3. The process adopted a decision tree methodology with the primary
purpose of: a) separating safety-related items from economic, and b) defining adequate
treatment of hidden functional failures.
Under MSG-3 logic, activities are assessed at the system level rather than the component level
In other words, if it can be demonstrated that the functional failure of a particular system had no
effect on operational safety, or that the economic repercussions were not significant, there was
no need for a routine maintenance activity.
Maintenance Review Board Report (MRBR) - Before introduction of a new aircraft, the aircraft
manufacturer - the Type Certificate (TC) holder – must prepare and submit for approval to the
relevant airworthiness authorities, the initial minimum scheduled maintenance requirements.
These minimum scheduled requirements are outlined in the Maintenance Review Board Report
(MRBR). After approval by the local regulatory authorities, the MRBR is used as a framework
around which each air carrier develops its own individual maintenance program. Although
maintenance programs may vary widely, the initial requirements for a particular aircraft will be
the same for all.
Maintenance Planning Document (MPD) - The MRB Report outlines the initial minimum
scheduled maintenance/inspection requirements to be used in the development of an approved
continuous airworthiness maintenance program. The Maintenance Planning Document (MPD)
contains all the MRB requirements plus mandatory scheduled maintenance requirements that
may only be changed with the permission of the applicable airworthiness authority.
Sometimes operators use reliability data to justify the escalation of task intervals within the
maintenance programme. This is perfectly acceptable as the escalation process requires
statistical evidence based on factual data collected from operational experience. However,
maintenance task escalations related to critical systems or components must be scrutinised
from system safety point of view. System design must be reviewed carefully and risk based
decisions must be made to avoid any catastrophic failure.
Additional requirements in the form of Service Letters, Service Bulletins and Airworthiness
Directives are the responsibility of the individual airline to incorporate.
Maintenance tasks recommended in engine, APU, and vendor manuals should also be
considered.
The AMM is organized by Air Transport Association (ATA) chapterisation system - the ATA
Chapter numbers provide a common referencing standard for all commercial aircraft
documentation including the MPD, AMM, Illustrated Parts Catalogue (IPC), etc.
Most operator’s maintenance departments will use the Aircraft Maintenance Programme in
conjunction with extracted procedures from an aircraft’s AMM to generate the task cards.
The tasks cards are used as a simple means of complying with regulations for performing
maintenance, as well as maintenance recordkeeping. Task cards provide detailed, concise
procedural instructions that organize and control maintenance activities while providing a means
to ensure compliance with their maintenance manual.
Task cards are an easy ways to ensure maintenance personnel are following proper
procedures.
During the course of normal operation, an aircraft will require unscheduled, non-routine
maintenance, to make repairs, or to remove and restore defective components. A need for
unscheduled maintenance may result from scheduled maintenance tasks, pilot reports, or
unforeseen events, such as high-load events, hard or overweight landings, tail strikes, ground
damage, lightning strikes, or an engine over-temperature.
The documents required to support rectification of discovered problems generally consists of:
Maintenance Event Letter Checks - All the tasks defined through the maintenance
development process will ultimately need to be allocated into scheduled work packages. Tasks
with similar intervals are then grouped into a number of maintenance packages, each with its
own interval. For commercial aircraft these intervals range from daily walk-around checks, to
Scheduled Maintenance Inspections performed at line maintenance station, to major checks
performed at base maintenance stations.
In the airline industry, a letter check is the alphabetic designation given to scheduled-
maintenance maintenance packages. The three most commonly used letter checks consists of:
A-Check,
C-Check
D-Check.
The A-Check generally consists of a general inspection of the interior/exterior of the aircraft
with selected areas opened. The A-check is typically performed biweekly to monthly. Examples
of A-check tasks are checking and servicing oil, filter replacement, lubrication, operational
checks, and inspections.
The C-Check is typically scheduled every 12-20 months depending on the operator, aircraft
type and utilization. Examples of C-check tasks include functional and operational systems
checks, cleaning and servicing, attendance to minor structural inspections and Service Bulletin
requirements.
The D-Check, or Heavy Maintenance Visit, occurs every 6-12 years, depending on the aircraft
type and utilization. Usually the aircraft is taken out of service for several weeks. During this
check the exterior paint is stripped and large parts of the outer panelling are removed,
uncovering the airframe, supporting structure and wings for inspection of most structurally
significant items.
In addition many of the aircraft’s internal components are functionally checked, repaired /
overhauled, or exchanged.
For modern aircraft types (e.g. Boeing 737NG family and Boeing 777), the ‘letter check’
distinctions are often less important, since MSG-3 task-orientated maintenance programs are
employed. MSG-3 allows maintenance tasks to be grouped into packages in a way that is more
efficient for the operator matching work against operational requirement – rather than carrying
out checks that are pre-defined by the MPD.
This method produces a small number of relatively large work packages having the
disadvantage of a relatively long maintenance ground time. Each letter check generally
incorporates all the work covered by preceding checks, plus the tasks assigned at that letter-
check interval. Thus each letter check often requires an increasing amount of man-power,
technical skills, and specialized equipment.
General
The aircraft must display:
Each marking and placard prescribed above must be displayed in a conspicuous place; and
may not be easily erased, disfigured, or obscured.
Instrument markings
When markings are on the cover glass of the instrument, there must be means to maintain the
correct alignment of the glass cover with the face of the dial.
Each instrument marking must be clearly visible to the appropriate crew member.
General
MMEL, MEL and CDL are documents used by the operator to perform commercial flight
operations even when some systems, components or other requirements do not function or
correspond with the defined standard of functionality.
These lists define the requirements in which limitations such operations may be performed.
They define the required system function, operational limitations and rectifications intervals.
All items related to the airworthiness of the aircraft and not included in the list are automatically
required to be operative. Non-safety-related equipment, such as galley equipment, passenger
convenience items, need not be listed.
The competent authority will only accept an application for MMEL approval from the type
certificate holder.
Operational and maintenance procedures are necessary to support certain MMEL items. These
procedures are identified to the authority during the approval process; however, the procedures
themselves will not be subject to approval. These procedures are referenced in the MMEL and
published concurrently with the MMEL as a guide for operators.
The procedures are appropriately amended, as and when the MMEL is revised the MMEL is
approved by the certification authority and issued as the basis for the preparation and
authorisation of the individual operator's minimum equipment list (MEL) for each aircraft type.
Where a change to the type certificate has an effect upon the MMEL, the type certificate holder
shall apply for approval of the necessary changes to the MMEL.
An operator shall establish, for each aircraft, a MEL, to be approved by the competent authority.
The MEL is based upon, but no less restrictive than, the relevant MMEL. All items related to the
airworthiness of the aircraft and not included in the list are automatically required to be
operative. Non-safety related items such as galley equipment, passenger convenience items,
need not be listed. Operators shall establish an effective decision making process for failures
that are not listed to determine if they are related to airworthiness and required for safe
operation.
The MEL may contain additional advisory material or modified operational and maintenance
procedures. The MEL may include additional operator’s requirements; however they may not be
less stringent than the MMEL.
Operators shall take operational and maintenance procedures referenced in the MMEL into
account when preparing an MEL. These procedures are referenced in the MEL and published
concurrently with the MEL as a guide for operators.
The procedures are appropriately amended, as and when the MMEL is revised. Items deferred
in accordance with the MEL must be repaired prior to the time required by the MEL category.
MEL categories are identified by the letters A, B, C and D requiring rectification intervals (see
below).
The operator may permit a one-time extension of the applicable rectification interval of the MEL
categories B, C and D for the same duration as that specified in the MMEL. A description of
specific duties and the responsibilities for controlling extensions is established by the operator
and the authority is notified within ten days of any extension authorised.
The operator is responsible for establishing an effective rectification programme that includes
tracking of the inoperative items and coordinating parts, personnel, facilities and procedures
necessary to ensure timely rectification.
Dispatch of the aircraft is not allowed after expiry of the rectification interval and possible
extension specified in the MEL.
Under certain specified conditions and circumstances operators may be granted approval by the
authority to introduce and implement special procedures for operations outside the condition of
the MEL. The special procedures will in no circumstances be used to permit flights outside the
constraints of the relevant MMEL.
Any operator-specific MEL is based on the manufacturer’s MMEL and must be approved by the
competent authority.
During line maintenance, procedures to handle CDL items consist of the administrative
practices necessary to release the aircraft and include log entries, down line, pilot and dispatch
notification. Also included will be any maintenance limitations associated with the missing item.
m- Means that a maintenance action is required when operating with item inoperative.
o- Means that a specific operation procedure must be accomplished by the flight crew.
These procedures may be inserted into the appropriate MEL pages, and submitted by the air
operator, to form part of the MEL. Dispatch Deviation Procedures Guides, Dispatch Deviation
Guides, and other similar documents cannot be approved by the Authority, nor can they replace
the MEL.
1. What document succeeded JAR-OPS, but has almost the same content?
2. IR-OPS applies from 28 October 2012; however, Member States had the option not to
apply the provisions of Annexes I to V until what date?
I Definitions
6. What certificate must an operator be granted with before it can fly aircraft for the purpose
of commercial air transportation?
7. What certificate must an operator be granted with before it can fly aircraft for any other
type of aerial work (other than transportation)?
8. What Paragraph of IR-OPS details the general rules for air operator certification?
ARO.OPS.100
Competent authority
10. With what type of fuel must the aircraft NOT be refuelled with, whilst passengers are on-
board the aircraft?
Commander
12. Who has responsibility to ensure that the aircraft has adequate fuel and oil for the
intended flight?
Commander
13. List the 10 items of equipment that must be approved and carried in accordance with IR-
OPS
14. How many spare electrical fuses must an aircraft carry when being operated under an
AOC?
15. An aeroplane flying during the day must have what EXTERNAL lights?
Anticollision
Nav/position lights
Landing lights
17. Aircraft above what MCTOM must be equipped with a windshield wiper?
18. An aircraft being flown under IFR must have what additional instrumentation, compared
to an aircraft flying under VFR?
Aeroplanes with MTOM greater than 5700 kg or more than 9 MOSPC and turbojet
engines
20. What does an altitude alerting system do?
21. Which aircraft must be equipped with a Terrain Awareness System (TAWS)?
22. Which aircraft must be equipped with an Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS)?
23. Which aircraft must be equipped with a cockpit voice recorder (CVR)?
25. A CVR must start recording when? And until what time must it continue to record data?
Aircraft capable of moving under its own power and continues until termination of
flight when no longer capable of moving under its own power
25 hours
28. A FDR must start recording when? And until what time must it continue to record data?
Aircraft capable of moving under its own power and continues until termination of
flight when no longer capable of moving under its own power
30. How many first aid kits are required on-board an aircraft with 200 seats?
32. How many fire extinguishers are required in a cabin of an aircraft with 250 seats?
33. How many megaphones are required in a cabin of an aircraft with 250 seats?
Hard Time:
Components are taken out of service when they reach a specified age, expressed as
the number of operating flight hours, flight cycles, calendar time, or other stress
units since new or since last shop visit
On-Condition
Condition Monitoring
Condition monitoring
ATA 100
A-Check
A general inspection of the interior and exterior of the aircraft with selected areas
opened. The A-check is typically performed bi-weekly to monthly.
C-Check
D-Check
Heavy Maintenance Visit, occurs every 6-12 years, depending on the aircraft type
and utilization. Usually the aircraft is taken out of service for several weeks. During
this check the exterior paint is stripped and large parts of the outer panelling are
removed, uncovering the airframe, supporting structure and wings for inspection of
most structurally significant items
MMEL is produced by the manufacturer (or TC holder) and applies to the type of
aircraft.
Operator
Competent authority
(m) maintenance action is required when operating with item inoperative item
Module 10
Licence Category A, B1 and B2
Aviation Legislation
LEVEL 1
A familiarisation with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and
examples.
The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
LEVEL 2
A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
An ability to apply that knowledge.
Objectives:
The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
LEVEL 3
A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive
manner.
Objectives:
The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects.
The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics
describing the subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's
instructions.
The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
You are strongly encouraged to study this document in detail. The following is a summary of
the salient points only.
(a) General
Regulation (EU) No. 748/2012
The Commission Regulation (EU) No. 748/2012 lays down implementing rules for the
airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft and related products, parts and
appliances, as well as for the certification of design and production organisations. This
regulation is part of the set of regulations that govern airworthiness and environmental
certification for the entire life of the product. The following diagram shows where 748/2012 fits
into the EASA regulation structure.
Regulation (EU) No. 748/2012 lays down common technical requirements and administrative
procedures for the airworthiness and environmental certification of products, parts and
appliances specifying:
The Annex to this Regulation is known as ‘Part-21’. Part-21 now contains requirements and
procedures for the certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances, and of
design and production organisations. Also forming part of the Regulation (EU) No. 748/2012 are
the Certification Specifications and Airworthiness Codes.
Subpart M Repairs
Reference will be made to the appropriate Subparts of Part-21, as we refer to individual topics
further on in this section.
All such ‘airworthiness codes’ are directly derived from the JARs. The JAR denomination has
been changed to Certification Specification (CS).
Currently, the Certification Specifications relating to initial airworthiness are the following:
Other Certification Specifications exist for Air Operations, Aircrew, Aerodromes and ATM/ANS -
Air Traffic Management/Air Navigation Services respectively
Subpart A: General. This Subpart provides information about the types and categories
of aircraft to which the standard is applicable.
Subpart B: Flight. This Subpart deals with the flight tests to be carried out to show
compliance with the requirements for performance, controllability and manoeuvrability,
stability, etc.
This Subpart does not exclusively cover certification flight tests; other Subparts contain
some requirements that must be complied with through flight tests.
Subpart C: Structure. This Subpart contains the requirements for flight and ground
load assessment, and for structural design of airframes, control systems, landing gears,
and other components. Crashworthiness and fatigue requirement parameters are also
provided.
Subpart D: Design and Construction. This Subpart deals with the design technique,
materials, safety factors, control system and landing gear design, structural tests to be
carried out, cockpit and passenger cabin design, fire protection and flutter
requirements, etc.
Subpart E: Power Plant. This Subpart contains the requirements for power plant
installations and related systems (like fuel, oil, exhaust systems, etc.). Power plant
controls, accessories, and fire protection are also considered.
Appendices These documents are of various natures; they can provide simplified
design load criteria, test procedures for assessment of material flammability,
instructions for continued airworthiness, and other information.
To design.
To demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements.
To independently check the statements of compliance.
To provide items for continued airworthiness.
To check the job performed by partners/subcontractors:
To independently monitor the above functions.
To provide the authority with the compliance documentation.
To allow the authority to make any inspection and any flight and ground tests necessary
to check the validity of the statements of compliance.
A crucial point, besides the normal design organization, is the institution of a Design
Assurance System (DAS) for control and supervision of the design, and design changes to the
product covered by the application. This includes all the activities for the achievement of the
type certificate, the approval of changes, and the maintenance of continued airworthiness.
A DOA is for a particular part or product. It should be noted that an aircraft or engine
manufacturer will normally have both DOA and POA approvals.
To satisfy the requirements the applicant has to justify that, for a defined scope of work, an
approval under this Subpart is appropriate for the purpose of showing conformity with a specific
design; and hold or have applied for an approval of that specific design; or have ensured,
through an appropriate arrangement with the applicant for, or holder of, an approval of that
specific design, satisfactory coordination between production and design.
The control procedures need to include specific provisions for any critical parts.
An independent quality assurance function is to monitor compliance with, and adequacy of, the
documented procedures of the quality system. This monitoring will include a feedback system
ultimately to the Accountable Manager, to ensure, as necessary, corrective action.
Approval Requirements
The production organisation must demonstrate, that:
(a) with regard to general approval requirements, facilities, working conditions, equipment
and tools, processes and associated materials, number and competence of staff, and
general organisation are adequate to discharge obligations
(b) with regard to all necessary airworthiness, noise, fuel venting and exhaust emissions
data:
The production organisation is in receipt of such data from EASA, and from the
holder of, or applicant for, the type-certificate, restricted type-certificate or design
approval, to determine conformity with the applicable design data.
The production organisation has established a procedure to ensure that
airworthiness, noise, fuel venting and exhaust emissions data are correctly
incorporated in its production data.
Such data are kept up to date and made available to all personnel who need access
to such data to perform their duties.
This Subpart establishes the rules governing the obligations of the manufacturer of a product,
part, or appliance being manufactured under this Subpart.
Any person may apply to show conformity of individual products, parts or appliances under this
Subpart, if:
it holds or has applied for an approval covering the design of that product, part or
appliance, or
it has ensured satisfactory coordination between production and design, through an
appropriate arrangement with the applicant for, or holder of, an approval of such a
design.
or
(ii) the certification or approval of a product, part or appliance under this Subpart is
needed pending the issuance of a production organisation approval under Subpart G.
(a) having established a production inspection system that ensures that each product, part
or appliance conforms to the applicable design data and is in condition for safe operation
The letter of agreement is issued for a limited duration not exceeding one year. It
remains valid unless:
The holder of the letter of agreement fails to demonstrate compliance with the
applicable requirements of this Subpart; or
There is evidence that the manufacturer cannot maintain satisfactory control of the
manufacture of products, parts, or appliances under the agreement; or
The manufacturer no longer meets the requirements of 21.A.122; or
The letter of agreement has been surrendered, revoked under 21B.145, or has
expired.
After investigation by the authority, the Type Certificate is issued. Note that a type certificate is
not an authority to fly. A valid Certificate of Airworthiness is required for each aircraft for
which the type certificate is issued before that aircraft can go into service. The type-certificate
for the aircraft type design is a pre-requisite for each series aircraft Certificate of Airworthiness
issue.
The manufacturer of the aircraft is normally the applicant for a type certificate. Any manufacturer
within the EU must apply directly to EASA for type approval.
It is normal for bilateral agreements to be in place to recognise type certificates from, amongst
others, the USA, Canada and Brazil.
Sometimes the manufacturer is not the type-certificate holder. This would be the case if the
manufacturer has gone out of business, or the manufacturer no longer produces the product
and may sell the type-certificate to another organisation who wishes to specialise in the
manufacture of spare parts for those products still in service. For this reason, the owner of the
type-certificate is generally referred to as the Type-Certificate Holder (TCH).
Part-21 Subpart B deals with type certificates; extracts are shown below:
Demonstration of Capability
Any organisation applying for a type-certificate or restricted type-certificate shall demonstrate its
capability by holding a Part-21 Subpart J Design Organisation Approval.
The applicant shall declare that it has shown compliance with all applicable type
certification basis and environmental protection requirements.
- The product to be certificated meets the applicable type certification basis and
environmental protection requirements designated. This is usually provided by the
issue of a Certificate of Design for the aircraft type, by the design organisation.
The Certificate of Design states that the aircraft meets current stated design
requirements specified in the Certification Specifications.
- Any airworthiness provisions not complied with are compensated for by factors
that provide an equivalent level of safety;
- No feature or characteristic makes it unsafe for the uses for which certification is
requested; and
- The type-certificate applicant has expressly stated that Part-21 has been complied
with.
In the case of an aircraft type certificate, the engine / propeller, or both, if installed in the aircraft,
have a type certificate issued or determined in accordance with Part-21.
or
The drawings and specifications, and a listing of those drawings and specifications,
necessary to define the configuration and the design features of the product shown to
comply with the applicable type-certification basis and environmental protection
requirements;
Information on materials and processes and on methods of manufacture and
assembly of the product necessary to ensure the conformity of the product;
An approved airworthiness limitations section of the instructions for continued
airworthiness as defined by the applicable Certification Specification; and
Any other data necessary to allow by comparison, the determination of the
airworthiness, the characteristics of noise, fuel venting, and exhaust emissions
(where applicable) of later products of the same type.
Type Certificate
The type-certificate and restricted type certificate are both considered to include the type
design, the operating limitations, the type certificate data sheet for airworthiness and emissions,
the applicable type-certification basis and environmental protection requirements with which
EASA records compliance, and any other conditions or limitations prescribed for the product in
the applicable certification specifications and environmental protection requirements.
The aircraft type certificate and restricted type certificate, in addition, both include the type
certificate data sheet for noise. The engine type certificate data sheet includes the record of
emission compliance.
Manuals
The holder of a type-certificate or restricted type-certificate shall produce, maintain and update
master copies of all manuals required by the applicable type-certification basis and
environmental protection requirements for the product, and provide copies, on request, to
EASA.
The availability of some manual or portion of the instructions for continued airworthiness,
dealing with overhaul or other forms of heavy maintenance, may be delayed until after the
product has entered into service, but is available before any of the products reaches the
relevant age or flight-hours/ cycles.
Minor changes are those that have no appreciable effect on the mass, balance, structural
strength, reliability, operational characteristics (noise, fuel venting, exhaust emission),” or other
characteristics affecting the airworthiness of the product.
Minor changes in a type design are approved by EASA, or by appropriately approved design
organization under a procedure agreed with EASA.
Major changes are all other changes. These must be approved by EASA.
For aircraft, an application for a new TC is required if the proposed change is:
For an engine, an application for a new TC is required if the proposed change is in the
principle of operation.
For a propeller an application for a new TC is required if the proposed change is in the
number of blades or principle of pitch change operation.
Nevertheless, another possibility does exist, and it is provided by any person who alters a
product by introducing a major change, not sufficient to require a new application for a type
certificate, applies to the authority for a Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
To provide just a couple of the countless possible examples: a design organization (other than
the TCH) can design an agricultural system for crop spraying to be installed on a type
certificated aircraft; in a similar way, a passenger transport aeroplane can be transformed into a
cargo aeroplane.
Any organization applying for a EASA STC shall demonstrate its capability by holding a Design
Organization Approval (DOA) or, by way of derogation, alternative procedures setting out the
specific design practices, resources, and sequence of activities necessary to comply with the
applicable requirements.
Because the STC is the approval of a major change in type design, what we have discussed
about the ‘change in type design’ is entirely applicable.
The certification process of an STC is similar to the type certification process of a product
(aircraft, engine, or propeller).
In relation to the practical introduction of an STC, a person may change an aircraft, engine,
propeller or appliance based on an existing STC only if the person requesting the change is the
holder of the STC or has permission from the holder to make the change.
The aircraft manufacturer (e.g. Learjet) supplies a standard design with a Type Certificate (TC).
The aircraft can then be flown and operated by an approved EMS operator holding an
appropriate Air Operator Certificate issued under EASA IR-OPS.
ETSO Authorisation would normally be applied for whenever a component is likely to be fitted to
several types of aircraft.
Requirements for the issue of European Technical Standard Order (ETSO) Authorisations are
found in Part 21 Section A Subpart O.
Marking requirements for the issue of European Technical Standard Order Authorisations are
found in Part 21 Section A Subpart Q.
Application
Applications for European Technical Standard Order Authorisation (ETSOA) are made through
EASA Form 34. Compliance with the applicable ETSO – standard(s) as well as Part 21 shall be
stated in a DDP (Declaration of Design and Performance).
Certificate of Registration
Aircraft Registration
An aircraft registration is a unique alphanumeric string that identifies a civil aircraft, in similar
fashion to a licence plate on a car. In accordance with the Convention on International Civil
Aviation all aircraft must be registered with a national aviation authority and they must carry
proof of this registration in the form of a legal document called a Certificate of Registration at
all times when in operation.
The register is maintained by the each National Aviation Authority of the EASA member state.
The certificate of registration must be accessible and stored with other airworthiness certificates
in the cockpit in accordance with EU-OPS regulations. Each aircraft must have its own aircraft
registration based on rules and regulation of the respective country of registration.
International Standards
The first use of aircraft registrations was based on the radio callsigns allocated at the London
International Radiotelegraphic Conference in 1913. This was modified by agreement by the
International Bureau at Berne and published on April 23, 1913. Although initial allocations were
not specifically for aircraft but for any radio user, the International Air Navigation Convention
held in Paris in 1919 made allocations specifically for aircraft registrations, based on the 1913
callsign list.
The agreement stipulated that the nationality marks were to be followed by a hyphen then a
group of four letters that must include a vowel (and for the convention Y was considered to be a
vowel).
At the International Radiotelegraph Convention at Washington in 1927, the list of markings was
revised and adopted from 1928; these allocations are the basis of the currently used
registrations. The markings have been amended and added to over the years, and the
allocations and standard are managed by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).
Article 20 of the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation (signed in 1944) requires
that all signatory countries register aircraft over a certain weight with a national aviation
authority. Upon registration, the aircraft receives its unique "registration", which must be
displayed prominently on the aircraft.
Annex 7 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation describes the definitions, location, and
measurement of nationality and registration marks. The aircraft registration is made up of a
prefix selected from the country's callsign prefix allocated by the International
Telecommunication Union (ITU) (making the registration a quick way of determining the country
of origin) and the registration suffix. Depending on the country of registration, this suffix is a
numeric or alphanumeric code, and consists of one to five digits or characters respectively.
This must be mounted on a major structural part of the aircraft, usually near the front door.
General
A Certificate of Airworthiness (C of A), or an airworthiness certificate, is issued for an aircraft by
the national aviation authority in the state in which the aircraft is registered. The airworthiness
certificate attests that the aircraft is airworthy insofar as the aircraft conforms to its type design.
The Certificate of Airworthiness (C of A) must be accessible and stored with other airworthiness
certificates in the cockpit accordance with EU-OPS regulations.
For each aircraft to be legally operated, the competent authority must issue a certificate of
airworthiness, which is valid for an unlimited period subject to a valid Airworthiness Review
Certificate (ARC) issued by a Part-M organisation, being attached.
(c) Permits to Fly are issued to aircraft that do not meet, or have not been shown to meet,
applicable certification specifications but are capable of safe flight under defined
conditions.
Additionally:
Note: A Certificate of Airworthiness is not valid unless a valid ARC is attached. See Part-M
Subpart I.
When importing an aircraft onto a member state register from a third country, the applicant
shall:
apply to the member state of registry for the issue of a new Airworthiness Certificate, in
accordance with Part-21
have an airworthiness review carried out by an appropriately approved Subpart G
organisation
have all maintenance as requested by the Continued Airworthiness Management
Organisation carried out
When satisfied, send a recommendation to the CA
The owner must allow access to the CA for inspection
A new Airworthiness Certificate and ARC will be issued by the CA when satisfied that the
requirements of Part-21 have been met.
The following Statement appears at the bottom of all Certificates of Airworthiness issued
in accordance with Part-21:
development;
showing compliance with regulations or certification specifications;
design organisations or production organisations crew training;
production flight testing of new production aircraft;
flying aircraft under production between production facilities;
flying the aircraft for customer acceptance;
delivering or exporting the aircraft;
flying the aircraft for Authority acceptance;
market survey, including customer’s crew training;
exhibition and air show;
flying the aircraft to a location where maintenance or airworthiness review are to be
performed, or to a place of storage;
flying an aircraft at a weight in excess of its maximum certificated take-off weight for flight
beyond the normal range over water, or over land areas where adequate landing facilities
or appropriate fuel is not available;
record breaking, air racing or similar competition;
flying aircraft meeting the applicable airworthiness requirements before conformity to the
environmental requirements has been found;
for non-commercial flying activity on individual non-complex aircraft or types for which a
certificate of airworthiness or restricted certificate of airworthiness is not appropriate.
Flight Conditions
Flight conditions include:
An appropriately approved design organisation may issue a permit to fly (EASA Form
20b) under the privilege granted.
An appropriately approved production organisation may issue a permit to fly (EASA Form
20b) under the privilege granted.
The permit to fly specifies the purpose(s) and any conditions and restrictions which have been
approved.
For permits issued by organisations other than the competent authority, a copy of the permit to
fly and associated flight conditions is submitted to the competent authority at the earliest
opportunity but not later than 3 days.
compliance with the conditions and restrictions associated with the permit to fly as
imposed at issue;
the permit to fly not being surrendered or revoked;
the aircraft remaining on the same register.
The EASA member states discharge their responsibilities regarding this ICAO requirement
through Regulation (EC) No. 216/2008 Article 6, and specifically Part-21 Subpart J Paragraph
21.A.18
The Noise Certificate must be accessible and stored with other airworthiness certificates in the
cockpit accordance with EU-OPS regulations. Any aircraft registered in an EU Member State,
shall have a Noise Certificate. An aeroplane, when flight-tested in accordance with the
requirements of CS-36 and operated within the limits of the type certificate, shall not exceed the
noise levels specified in CS-36.140.
Introduction
During any phase of operation, the loading, mass and centre of gravity (CG) of the aircraft shall
comply with the limitations specified in the AFM, or the operations manual if more restrictive.
The operator shall establish the mass and the CG of any aircraft by actual weighing prior to
initial entry into service and thereafter at intervals of four years if individual aircraft masses are
used, or nine years if fleet masses are used. The accumulated effects of modifications and
repairs on the mass and balance shall be accounted for and properly documented. Aircraft shall
be reweighed if the effect of modifications on the mass and balance is not accurately known.
The operator shall determine the mass of all operating items and crew members included in the
aircraft dry operating mass by weighing or by using standard masses. The influence of their
position on the aircraft’s CG shall be determined.
The mass and balance documentation shall contain the following information:
Aircraft registration and type;
Flight identification, number and date;
Name of the commander;
Name of the person who prepared the document;
Dry operating mass and the corresponding CG of the aircraft:
Mass of the fuel at take-off and the mass of trip fuel;
Mass of consumables other than fuel, if applicable;
Load components including passengers, baggage, freight and ballast;
Take-off mass, landing mass and zero fuel mass;
Applicable aircraft CG positions; and
The limiting mass and CG values.
The information above shall be available in flight planning documents or mass and balance
systems. Some of this information may be contained in other documents readily available for
use.
(a) General
4. Where would you find Certification Standards for Engine Fire Protection?
CS-E
5. Under what CS would Rolls Royce certify their engines for approval?
CS-E
The EASA
- A repair
By providing manuals
EASA
13. How does an approved production organisation ensure the quality of components
sourced from subcontractors?
14. When would a component be certified under European Technical Standard Order
authorization (ETSO)?
When the component is made for fitment to various aircraft and equipment
Unlimited providing the aircraft remains compliance with the applicable type-design
and continuing airworthiness requirements; and the aircraft remains on the same
register; and the type-certificate or restricted type-certificate under which it is
issued not being previously invalidated
Permits to fly are issued to aircraft that do not meet, or have not been shown to
meet, applicable airworthiness requirements but are capable of safe flight under
defined conditions
Competent authority
An approved design organisation
An approved production organisation
A CAMO
19. If an aircraft, which flies subject to a Permit to Fly, is sold, what are the only 2 conditions
that the Permit to Fly can be transferred with the aircraft, to the new owner?
12 months
When the aircraft is proven not to exceed the noise levels specified in CS-36.140
Module 10
Licence Category A, B1 and B2
Aviation Legislation
LEVEL 1
A familiarisation with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and
examples.
The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
LEVEL 2
A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
An ability to apply that knowledge.
Objectives:
The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
LEVEL 3
A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive
manner.
Objectives:
The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects.
The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics
describing the subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's
instructions.
The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
Part-21 __________________________________________________________________ 8
Description ______________________________________________________________ 8
Part-21 Subparts _________________________________________________________ 9
Part-21 - Provisions Related to Airworthiness _________________________________ 10
Part-21 Subpart A - Airworthiness Directives ___________________________________ 10
Part-21 Subpart B - Manuals _______________________________________________ 14
Part-21 Subpart H – Certificates of Airworthiness _______________________________ 16
Part-21 Subpart M – Repairs _______________________________________________ 16
Part-M – Continued Airworthiness and Airworthiness Management _______________ 18
General _______________________________________________________________ 18
Part-M Subparts _________________________________________________________ 18
Where Part-M Fits Within Regulation (EU) No. 1321/2014 ________________________ 18
Part-M In Relation To Maintenance of Aircraft __________________________________ 20
Relationship between the CAMO, the Operator and the Maintenance organisation _____ 22
Relationship between the Part-21 Design and Production Organisations and the Operator
and the Part-M / Part-145 organisation _______________________________________ 22
Part-M Subpart B - Accountability ___________________________________________ 24
General _______________________________________________________________ 24
Pre-flight Servicing _______________________________________________________ 24
Contracting of CAMO Organisations by Aircraft Owners __________________________ 24
Responsibilities _________________________________________________________ 25
Occurrence Reporting ____________________________________________________ 27
Part-M Subpart C - Continuing Airworthiness _________________________________ 28
Continuing Airworthiness Tasks _____________________________________________ 28
The Maintenance Programme ______________________________________________ 30
Data for Modifications and Repairs __________________________________________ 31
Aircraft Continuing Airworthiness Record System _______________________________ 31
Operator's Technical Log System ___________________________________________ 34
Part-M Subpart D - Maintenance Standards ___________________________________ 36
Maintenance Data _______________________________________________________ 36
Performance of Maintenance _______________________________________________ 37
Independent Inspections __________________________________________________ 38
Aircraft Defects _________________________________________________________ 39
Part-M Subpart E - Components ____________________________________________ 40
Part-M Subpart F - Non-Commercial Air Transport Maintenance Organisations______ 42
Part-M Subpart G – The Continuous Airworthiness Maintenance Organisation (CAMO)
_______________________________________________________________________ 44
General _______________________________________________________________ 44
Commercial Air Transport (CAT) Operator and Subpart G ________________________ 46
CAMO Privileges ________________________________________________________ 47
CAMO Facilities _________________________________________________________ 48
CAMO Personnel Requirements ____________________________________________ 48
CAMO Duties ___________________________________________________________ 49
https://easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/decision_ED_2003_19_RM.pdf
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:224:0001:0085:en:PDF
https://easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/decision_ED_2003_01_RM.pdf
You are strongly encouraged to study this document (including the AMC/GM) in detail. The
following is a summary of the salient points only. On any Module 10 examination, you are likely
to be examined on all details of the Part-66 including its AMC and GM.
Part-21
Description
Part-21 is Annex I of Regulation (EU) No. 748/2012 and lays down, in accordance with Article 5
and Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008, common technical requirements and
administrative procedures for the airworthiness and environmental certification of products,
parts and appliances specifying:
If a certified aircraft has outstanding airworthiness directives that have not been complied with,
the aircraft is not considered airworthy. Thus, it is mandatory for an aircraft operator to comply
with an AD.
ADs usually result from service difficulty reporting by operators or from the results of aircraft
accident investigations. They are issued either by the national civil aviation authority of the
country of aircraft manufacture or of aircraft registration.
When ADs are issued by the country of registration they are almost always coordinated with the
civil aviation authority of the country of manufacture to ensure that conflicting ADs are not
issued.
ADs are mandatory in most jurisdictions and often contain dates or aircraft flying hours by which
compliance must be completed.
Those of an emergency nature requiring immediate compliance prior to further flight, and
Those of a less urgent nature requiring compliance within a specified period of time.
EASA issues an airworthiness directive when an unsafe condition has been determined by
EASA to exist in an aircraft, as a result of a deficiency in the aircraft, or an engine, propeller,
part or appliance installed on this aircraft; and that condition is likely to exist or develop in other
aircraft.
When an airworthiness directive is issued by EASA to correct the unsafe, or to require the
performance of an inspection, the holder of the type-certificate, restricted type-certificate,
supplemental type-certificate, major repair design approval, shall propose the appropriate
corrective action or required inspections, or both, and submit details of these proposals to the
EASA for approval.
Following the approval they will then make available to all known operators or owners of the
product, part or appliance and, on request, to any person required to comply with the
airworthiness directive, appropriate descriptive data and accomplishment instructions.
More details relating to the international recognition of Airworthiness Directives can be found in
Section 10.7.
The holder of a type-certificate produces, maintains and updates master copies of all manuals
required for the continued airworthiness of the product, and provides copies, on request, to
EASA.
The holder of the type-certificate supplies at least one set of manuals for continued
airworthiness, comprising descriptive data and accomplishment instructions, to each known
owner of one or more aircraft, engine or propeller upon its delivery or upon issue of the first
certificate of airworthiness for the affected aircraft, whichever occurs later and thereafter make
those instructions available on request to any other person required to comply with any of the
terms of those instructions.
The availability of some manual or portion of the instructions for continued airworthiness,
dealing with overhaul or other forms of heavy maintenance, may be delayed until after the
product has entered into service, but is available before any of the products reaches the
relevant age or flight-hours/cycles.
In addition, changes to the instructions for continued airworthiness are made available to all
known operators of the product and are made available on request to any person required to
comply with any of those instructions.
A programme showing how changes to the instructions for continued airworthiness are
distributed is submitted to EASA.
For EASA aircraft, the Certificate of Airworthiness is issued in accordance with the requirements
of Part-21 Subpart H.
Further details of the issue of the Certificate of Airworthiness can be found in Section 10.5.
Elimination of damage by replacement of parts or appliances without the necessity for design
activity is considered as a maintenance task and therefore requires no approval under Part 21.
However, repairs that require design input are required to be designed by an approved Design
Organisation (approved in accordance with Part-21 Subpart J).
Classification of Repairs
A repair may be ‘major’ or ‘minor’. The classification is made in accordance with the criteria of
for a change in the type design.
by EASA;
or
by an appropriately approved design organisation under a procedure agreed with EASA.
and that follow design data included in certification specifications issued by EASA, containing
acceptable methods, techniques and practices for carrying out and identifying standard repairs,
including the associated instructions for continuing airworthiness; and that are not in conflict
with TC holder’s data.
Repair embodiment
The embodiment of a repair is made in accordance with Part-M or Part-145 as appropriate, or
by a production organisation appropriately approved in accordance with Part-21 Subpart G.
The design organisation provides to the organisation performing the repair all the necessary
installation instructions.
General
Part-M concerns the airworthiness management of aircraft registered in an EU member state.
All applicable aircraft have been subject to its provisions since September 28 2008. Prior to this
date EU-OPS Subpart M contained a lot of this detail. Where Part-M differs is that it now also
contains regulations for independent Continuing Aircraft Management Organisations
(CAMO) and introduces the concept of the non-expiring Certificate of Airworthiness and the
Airworthiness Review Certificate (ARC).
EU-OPS is now replaced by AIR-OPS. All previous contents of EU-OPS Subpart M has been
transferred to Part-M.
Part-M Subparts
Subpart A — General
Subpart B — Accountability
Subpart C — Continuing Airworthiness
Subpart D — Maintenance Standards
Subpart E — Components
Subpart F — Maintenance Organisation
Subpart G — Continuing Airworthiness Management Organisation
Subpart H — Certificate of Release to Service — CRS
Subpart I — Airworthiness Review Certificate
MEL / CDL
Maintenance
Programme
Reliability
Monitoring
Maintenance
Check Flights
Modifications
and Repairs
Lifing Parts
Technical
Control control
Log
From the figure below it can be seen that the Part-M Subpart G Continuing Airworthiness
Management Organisation (CAMO) is the interface between the owner and any Part-145
organisation that it may contract maintenance to. In the event that the Part-145 organisation is
internal then a service level agreement must be included within the Part-M Exposition. In the
case of one-off tasks (e.g. to recover an aircraft) individual work orders can be used.
Contract or Maintenance
CAMO (Part-M
Work Order Organisation
Sub Part G)
Applicable
Design and
maintenance
Manufacture
and design data
organisation
The relationships between CAMO, Operator and the Part-145 organisations are almost limitless,
but the following should be noted.
Private owners of large aircraft (> 5700Kg MTOW) can contract a CAMO to act on their
behalf. The CAMO will be approved under Part-M Subpart G.
Airworthiness of all CAT aircraft, Twin Engine Helicopters and Large Aircraft must be
managed by a CAMO approved in accordance with Part-M Subpart G.
Relationship between the Part-21 Design and Production Organisations and the Operator
and the Part-M / Part-145 organisation
Part-21 requires that DOAs and POAs design and build in accordance with the certification
standards within Part-21 (Certification Specifications). In addition they are also required to
provide sufficient information and support to the operator to ensure continued airworthiness
Design Organisation
approval under Part-21
Subpart J is just one of
their many EASA
approvals
General
The owner/lessee is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft and shall ensure
that no flight takes place unless:
When the aircraft is leased the responsibility of the owner is transferred to the lessee if:
or;
For simplicity in these training notes we shall refer to the operator, who may be the owner or the
lessee, except when extra clarity is required.
Any person or organisation performing maintenance is responsible for the tasks performed.
Pre-flight Servicing
The pilot-in-command or, in the case of commercial air transport, the operator is responsible for
the satisfactory accomplishment of the pre-flight inspection. This inspection must be carried out
by the pilot or another qualified person but need not be carried out by an approved maintenance
organisation or by Part-66 certifying staff.
In the case of large aircraft, in order to satisfy these responsibilities, the owner of an aircraft
shall ensure that the tasks associated with continuing airworthiness are performed by a CAMO.
A written contract is made in accordance with Appendix I to Part-M. In this case, the continuing
airworthiness management organisation assumes responsibility for the proper accomplishment
of these tasks.
The performance of ground de-icing and anti-icing activities does not require a Part-145
approval.
The requirement means that the operator is responsible for determining what maintenance is
required, when it has to be performed and by whom and to what standard, in order to ensure
the continued airworthiness of the aircraft being operated.
An operator should therefore have adequate knowledge of the design status (type specification,
customer options, airworthiness directives (AD), modifications, operational equipment) and
required and performed maintenance. Status of aircraft design and maintenance should be
adequately documented to support the performance of the quality system.
The requirement does not mean that an operator himself performs the maintenance (this is to
be done by a maintenance organisation approved to Part-145) but that the operator carries the
responsibility for the airworthy condition of aircraft it operates and thus should be satisfied
before the intended flight that all required maintenance has been properly carried out.
When an operator is not appropriately approved in accordance with Part-145, the operator
should provide a clear work order to the maintenance contractor. The fact that an operator has
contracted a maintenance organisation approved under Part-145 should not prevent it from
checking at the maintenance facilities on any aspect of the contracted work if he wishes to do
so to satisfy his responsibility for the airworthiness of the aircraft.
An operator only needs to be approved for the management of the continuing airworthiness of
the aircraft listed on its Air Operator Certificate (AOC). The approval to carry out airworthiness
reviews is optional.
This approval does not prevent the operator subcontracting certain continuing airworthiness
management tasks to competent persons or organisations. This activity is considered as an
integral element of the operator’s Part-M Subpart G approval. The regulatory monitoring is
exercised through the operator’s Part-M Subpart G. approval. The contracts should be
acceptable to the competent authority.
Part-M does not provide for organisations to be independently approved to perform continuing
airworthiness management tasks on behalf of commercial air transport operators. The approval
of such activity is vested in the operator’s air operator’s certificate (AOC). The sub-contracted
organisation is considered to perform the continuing airworthiness management tasks as an
integral part of the operator's continuing airworthiness management system, irrespective of any
other approval held by the subcontractor including a Part-M Subpart G approval.
In order to retain ultimate responsibility, the operator should limit sub-contracted tasks to the
activities specified below:
With the exception of engines and auxiliary power units contracts would normally be limited to
one organisation per aircraft type for any combination of the activities. Where arrangements are
made with more than one organisation the operator should demonstrate adequate co-ordination
controls are in place and that the individual responsibilities are clearly defined in related
contracts.
The operator should ensure that any findings arising from the competent authority monitoring of
the sub-contracted continuing airworthiness management tasks will be closed to the satisfaction
of the competent authority. This provision should be included in the contract.
The sub-contracted organisation should agree to notify the respective operators of any changes
affecting the contracts as soon as practical. The operator should then inform its competent
authority. Failure to do so may invalidate the competent authority acceptance of the contract.
Occurrence reporting for Part-M requirements are exactly the same as those for Part-145. They
are repeated below:
Any person or organisation responsible shall report to the State of registry, the
organisation responsible for the type design or supplemental type design and, if
applicable, the Member State of operator, any identified condition of an aircraft or
component that hazards seriously the flight safety.
Reports are made in a manner established by EASA and contain all pertinent information
about the condition known to the person or organisation.
Reports are made as soon as practicable, but in any case within 72-hours of the person
or organisation identifying the condition to which the report relates.
Later in this section you will see how management of airworthiness is achieved in different ways
for large and small organisations, to suit their business. In any case they must always carry out
certain airworthiness tasks. Part-M lists those tasks.
the rectification to an officially recognised standard of any defect and damage affecting
safe operation taking into account, for all large aircraft or aircraft used for commercial air
transport, the Minimum Equipment List (MEL) and Configuration Deviation List (CDL) if
applicable to the aircraft type;
for all large aircraft or aircraft used for commercial air transport the analysis of the
effectiveness of the approved maintenance programme, with regard to spares,
established defects, malfunctions and damage, and to amend the programme as
necessary;
for non-mandatory modifications and/or inspections, for all large aircraft or aircraft used
for commercial air transport the establishment of an embodiment policy;
The aircraft’s
Doors are securely
external surfaces
fastened. and engines are
free from ice,
snow, sand, dust
etc.
The pre-flight inspection
The maintenance programme and any subsequent amendments are approved by the
competent authority.
Notwithstanding this previous sentence, when the aircraft continuing airworthiness is managed
by a CAMO approved under Part-M Subpart G the maintenance programme and its
amendments may be approved through a maintenance programme procedure established by
such organisation (hereinafter called indirect approval).
instructions issued by the competent authority, if they differ from paragraph 1 or in the
absence of specific recommendations, or
instructions defined by the owner or the operator and approved by the competent
authority if they differ from paragraphs 1 and 2.
The maintenance programme shall contain details, including frequency, of all maintenance to be
carried out, including any specific tasks linked to specific operations. The programme must
include a reliability programme when the maintenance programme is based on Maintenance
Steering Group logic, or on Condition Monitoring.
The term “maintenance programme” is intended to include scheduled maintenance tasks the
associated procedures and standard maintenance practises. The term “maintenance schedule”
is intended to embrace the scheduled maintenance tasks alone.
The aircraft should only be maintained to one approved maintenance programme at a given
point in time. Where an owner or operator wishes to change from one approved programme to
other, a transfer check or inspection may need to be performed in order to implement the
change.
The aircraft maintenance programme should contain a preface which will define the
maintenance programme contents, the inspection standards to be applied, permitted variations
to task frequencies and where applicable, any procedure to manage the evolution of established
The approved aircraft maintenance programme should reflect applicable mandatory regulatory
requirements addressed in documents issued by the TC holder to comply with Part-21.A.61.
Repetitive maintenance tasks derived from modifications and repairs should be incorporated
into the approved maintenance programme.
Furthermore, an owner or operator’s maintenance programme should also take into account
any maintenance data containing information on scheduling for components.
Damage is assessed and modifications and repairs carried out using data approved by EASA or
by an approved Part-21 design organisation, as appropriate.
At the completion of any maintenance, the associated certificate of release to service is entered
in the aircraft continuing airworthiness records. Each entry is made as soon as practicable but in
no event more than 30 days after the day of maintenance action.
The aircraft continuing airworthiness records shall consist of, as appropriate, an aircraft
logbook, engine logbook(s) or engine module log cards, propeller logbook(s) and log cards, for
any service life limited component and the operator's technical log.
The aircraft type and registration mark, the date, together with total flight time and/or flight
cycles and/or landings, as appropriate, is entered in the aircraft logbooks.
The type, serial number and registration of the aircraft to which the particular component has
been fitted, along with the reference to the installation and removal of the component.
The particular component accumulated total flight time and/or flight cycles and/or landings
and/or calendar time, as appropriate.
An owner or operator shall ensure that a system has been established to keep the following
records for the periods specified:
All detailed maintenance records in respect of the aircraft and any life-limited component fitted
thereto, at least 24-months after the aircraft or component was permanently withdrawn from
service;
The total time and flight cycles as appropriate, of the aircraft and all life-limited components, at
least 12-months after the aircraft or component has been permanently withdrawn from service,
and;
The time and flight cycles as appropriate, since last scheduled maintenance of the component
subjected to a service life limit, at least until the component scheduled maintenance has been
superseded by another scheduled maintenance of equivalent work scope and detail;
The current status of compliance with maintenance programme such that compliance with the
approved aircraft maintenance programme can be established, at least until the aircraft or
component scheduled maintenance has been superseded by other scheduled maintenance of
equivalent work scope and detail;
The current status of airworthiness directives applicable to the aircraft and components, at
least 12-months after the aircraft or component has been permanently withdrawn from service,
and; Details of current modifications and repairs to the aircraft, engine(s), propeller(s) and any
other component vital to flight safety, at least 12-months after they have been permanently
withdrawn from service.
In the case of commercial air transport, an operator shall use an aircraft technical log system
containing the following information for each aircraft:
information about each flight, necessary to ensure continued flight safety, and;
the current aircraft certificate of release to service, and;
the current maintenance statement giving the aircraft maintenance status of what
scheduled and out of phase maintenance is next due except that the competent authority
may agree to the maintenance statement being kept elsewhere, and;
all outstanding deferred defects rectifications that affect the operation of the aircraft, and;
any necessary guidance instructions on maintenance support arrangements.
The aircraft technical log system and any subsequent amendment is approved by the
competent authority.
An operator shall ensure that the aircraft technical log is retained for 36 months after the date of
the last entry.
For commercial air transport the operator’s aircraft technical log is a system for recording
defects and malfunctions during the aircraft operation and for recording details of all
maintenance carried out on an aircraft between scheduled base maintenance visits. In addition,
it is used for recording flight safety and maintenance information the operating crew need to
know.
Cabin or galley defects and malfunctions that affect the safe operation of the aircraft or the
safety of its occupants are regarded as forming part of the aircraft log book where recorded by
another means.
The operator’s aircraft technical log system may range from a simple single section document to
a complex system containing many sections but in all cases it should include the information
specified in Part-M.
For those studying Part-145, you will notice that there is some duplication, but that is inevitable
as to comply with Subpart D those same standards must be incorporated within any Part-145
organisation also.
Maintenance Data
M.A.401
The person or organisation maintaining an aircraft shall have access to and use only applicable
current maintenance data in the performance of maintenance including modifications and
repairs.
Applicable maintenance data must be current and readily available for use, before maintaining
an aircraft or component. A worksheet or work-card system required. The data must be either
accurately transcribed onto the worksheets or they should make precise reference to the tasks
in the maintenance data.
All maintenance is performed using the tools, equipment and material specified in Part-M unless
otherwise specified by Part-145. Where necessary, tools and equipment are controlled and
calibrated to an officially recognised standard.
The area in which maintenance is carried out is well organised and clean in respect of dirt and
contamination.
All maintenance is performed within any environmental limitations specified in Part-M. In case of
inclement weather or lengthy maintenance, proper facilities are used. After completion of all
maintenance a general verification must be carried out to ensure the aircraft or component is
clear of all tools, equipment and any other extraneous parts and material, and that all access
panels removed have been refitted.
The second independent competent person is not issuing a maintenance release therefore is
not required to hold certification privileges. However they should be suitably qualified to carry
out the inspection.
When work is being done under the control of an approved maintenance organisation the
organisation should have procedures to demonstrate that the signatories have been trained and
have gained experience on the specific control systems being inspected.
Any aircraft defect that hazards seriously the flight safety is rectified before further flight.
Only the authorised certifying staff, according to Part-M or Part-145 can decide whether an
aircraft defect hazards seriously the flight safety and therefore decide when and which
rectification action is taken before further flight and which defect rectification can be deferred.
However, this does not apply when:
The approved minimum equipment list as mandated by the competent authority is used
by the pilot; or,
Aircraft defects are defined as being acceptable by the competent authority.
Any aircraft defect that would not hazard seriously the flight safety is rectified as soon as
practicable, after the date the aircraft defect was first identified and within any limits specified in
the maintenance data. Any defect not rectified before flight is recorded in the aircraft
maintenance record system or operator's technical log system as applicable.
M.A.501 – Installation
M.A.502 – Component maintenance
M.A.503 – Service life limited components
M.A.504 – Control of unserviceable
components
This Subpart identifies the requirements to be met by an organisation to qualify for the approval
to certify the maintenance of small aircraft not used for commercial air transport.
The requirements mirror those contained in Part-145, however they have been adjusted to
reflect the complexity of the equipment and scale of the operations supported.
See “Section 10.3 – Approved Maintenance Organisations”, for further details of the
requirements for organisations approved in accordance with Part-M Subpart F.
An operator must have an AOC. To obtain an AOC the operator’s application must contain:
The CAME referred to above has the same contents as the CAME content shown below for an
independent CAMO.
Independent CAMO
The application is made on EASA form 2 and shall consist of an Exposition (CAME) containing
the following:
a statement signed by the accountable manager to confirm that the organisation will work
in accordance with Part-M and the exposition at all times, and;
the organisation's scope of work, and;
the title(s) and name(s) of person(s) referred to in Part-M, and;
an organisation chart showing associated chains of responsibility between the person(s)
referred to in Part-M, and;
a list of airworthiness review staff, and;
a general description and location of the facilities, and;
procedures specifying how the continuing airworthiness management organisation
ensures compliance with Part-M, and;
The continuing airworthiness management exposition amendment procedures.
• Arrange to have any task of continuing airworthiness carried out with another
organisation that is working under its quality system. (i.e. subcontract
arrangement)
A CAMO may:
In order to retain ultimate responsibility the operator should limit sub-contracted tasks to the
activities specified below:
CAMO Facilities
M.A.705
Suitable office accommodation at appropriate locations must be provided for the CAMO staff.
Accountable Manager – For airworthiness of CAT aircraft, this is the operator’s Accountable
Manager
For CAT aircraft, the Accountable Manager shall designate a nominated post holder responsible
for the management and supervision of continuing airworthiness activities.
and have five year’s relevant work experience of which at least two years should be from the
aeronautical industry in an appropriate position
CAMO Duties
M.A.708
The organisation shall for each aircraft managed: need to apply Sub-part D maintenance
standards and ensure the following Subpart C tasks are carried out:
Develop and control an approved maintenance programme and gain approval from the
competent authority
Manage approval of modifications and repairs
Ensure all maintenance is carried our per the approved maintenance programme and a
CRS is issued for all work carried out
Ensure all ADs are complied with
Ensure all defects are rectified
Ensure aircraft is taken to a Part-145 organisation whenever necessary
Co-ordinate all scheduled maintenance and ADs to ensure the work is carried out
properly (standards monitoring)
Manage and archive records
Ensure accuracy of the mass and balance statement
Where an Operator is not appropriately approved to Part-45, the Operator shall have a written
maintenance contract with the Part-145 organisation(s).
All contracts are specified in the CAME and thus approved by the Competent Authority.
Except for aircraft released to service by a Part-145 organisation, the certificate of release to
service is issued according to this Subpart.
A certificate of release to service is issued before flight at the completion of any maintenance.
When satisfied that all maintenance required has been properly carried out, a certificate of
release to service is issued:
Except for complex maintenance tasks listed in Appendix VII, by certifying staff in
compliance with the requirements of Part-66; or
By the pilot-owner.
The certifying staff may be assisted in the execution of the maintenance tasks by one or more
persons under his direct and continuous control.
A certificate of release to service shall contain basic details of the maintenance carried out, the
date such maintenance was completed and:
the identity and if applicable licence number of the certifying staff must be annotated
on the CRS.
In the case of incomplete maintenance, such fact is entered in the aircraft certificate of release
to service before the issue of such certificate.
A certificate of release to service shall not be issued in the case of any known non-compliance
which hazards seriously the flight safety.
The authorised release certificate identified as EASA Form-1 for the Member States constitutes
the aircraft component certificate of release to service.
The pilot-owner is the person who owns or jointly owns the aircraft being maintained and holds
a valid pilot licence with the appropriate type or class rating.
For any privately operated aircraft of simple design with a maximum take-off mass (MTOM) of
less than 2730 kg, glider and balloon, the pilot-owner may issue the certificate of release to
service after limited pilot owner maintenance listed in Appendix VIII to Part-M.
The certificate of release to service must be entered in the logbooks and contain basic details of
the maintenance carried out, the date such maintenance was completed and the identity and
pilot licence number of the pilot-owner issuing such a certificate.
General
For an aircraft’s Certificate of Airworthiness (C of A) to be valid a current Airworthiness Review
Certificate (ARC) must be attached.
To satisfy the requirement for an airworthiness review of an aircraft, a full documented review of
the aircraft records is carried out by the approved continuing airworthiness management
organisation in order to be satisfied that:
airframe, engine and propeller flying hours and associated flight cycles have been
properly recorded, and;
the flight manual is applicable to the aircraft configuration and reflects the latest revision
status, and;
all the maintenance due on the aircraft according to the approved maintenance
programme has been carried out, and;
all known defects have been corrected or, when applicable, carried forward in a
controlled manner, and;
all applicable airworthiness directives have been applied and properly registered, and;
all modifications and repairs applied to the aircraft have been registered and are
approved according to Part-21,and;
all service life limited components installed on the aircraft are properly identified,
registered and have not exceeded their approved service life limit, and;
all maintenance has been released in accordance with Part-M, and;
the current mass and balance statement reflects the configuration of the aircraft and is
valid, and;
the aircraft complies with the latest revision of its type design approved by EASA.
Through the physical survey of the aircraft, the airworthiness review staff shall ensure that:
The airworthiness review can be anticipated by a maximum period of 90 days without loss of
continuity of the airworthiness review pattern, to allow the physical review to take place during
maintenance.
Providing the aircraft remains under the continuous control of a CAMO the ARC may be
renewed twice at intervals of 1 year without a further physical survey, however the paperwork
review must take place at each renewal.
If aircraft NOT
maintained in a
controlled environment,
the CAMO issues a
recommendation to the
2009 Competent Authority
2010 2011 2012
for issue of the ARC
(on Form 15a)
annually.
ARC Issue and Extension
The organisation shall have appropriate airworthiness review staff to issue airworthiness review
certificates (ARC) or recommendations. They will be qualified as follows:
formally accepted by the competent authority prior to authorisation issue (on EASA
Form-4).
5-years continuing airworthiness experience appropriate
Part-66 license or aeronautical degree or equivalent in addition to formal aeronautical
engineering training.
a position within the approved organisation with appropriate responsibilities.
named in the CAME.
The airworthiness review staff must be independent from the airworthiness management
process.
This includes maintenance carried out by the pilot-owner and release to service by the pilot-
owner or independent licensed engineer where permitted by Part-M.
Where the controlled environment cannot be maintained or if the CAMO does not hold the
privilege to issue an ARC, another CAMO which holds the privilege needs to be contracted.
The ARC would then be issued by the authority following a satisfactory assessment based on a
recommendation from this contracted CAMO.
ARC Validity
The ARC is invalidated when:
it is suspended or revoked
the Certificate of Airworthiness is suspended or revoked
the aircraft is not on the register of an EASA member state or
the Type Certificate (TC) is suspended or revoked
Note that the Certificate of Airworthiness is valid indefinitely providing a valid ARC is attached to
it.
2. List the three types of Certificates for which Regulation (EU) No. 748/2012 provides the
common technical requirements (according to the Scope and definitions).
Noise certificates
3. What are Article 8 and Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No. 748/2012 concerned with,
respectively?
4. The only Annex (Annex I) to Regulation (EU) No. 748/2012 is better known as what?
Part-21
5. What is the full descriptive title of the Annex to Regulation (EU) No. 748/2012?
Certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances, and of design
and production organisations
6. Who is the competent authority for an organisation having their principle place of
business in a non-member state of EASA?
EASA
21.A.3B
EASA
21.A.57
10. Who is responsible for producing and maintaining manuals required for the continuing
airworthiness of aircraft and products?
Subpart H
21.A.173
21.A.179
12. When an aircraft is transferred and re-registered in another EASA member state, what
happens to the Certificate of Airworthiness?
13. What are the 4 conditions for a Certificate of Airworthiness to remain valid for an
unlimited duration?
Subpart M
21.A.431
21.A.432B
15. How does an applicant for a major repair design approval demonstrate its capability?
21.A.435
Major
Minor
The Agency; or
by an appropriately approved design organisation under a procedure agreed with the
Agency
Part-M organisation
19. In what Journal is the Regulation (EU) No. 1321/2014 published in?
20. According to Article 1 of Regulation (EU) No. 1321/2014, the Rules do not apply to
aircraft which are listed where?
21. For the purposes of Regulation (EU) No. 1321/2014, what is the definition of a “large
aircraft”?
Inspection carried out before flight to ensure aircraft is fit for intended flight
Annex I
M.A.201
The owner
25. Who is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft if the owner leases it to
a different operator?
The lessee
27. Tasks associated with the continuing airworthiness of a Large aircraft are to be carried
out by what organisation?
28. Maintenance of large aircraft, aircraft used for commercial air transport and components
thereof are carried out by what approved organisation type?
Part-145 organisation
29. An operator of commercial air transport aircraft, must have what Subpart M approval as a
part of their Air Operator Certificate (AOC)?
Subpart G (CAMO)
30. If an operator of commercial air transport aircraft is not itself Part-145 approved, how can
they get their aircraft maintained?
31. When an operator who uses an aircraft other than for commercial air transport, they have
a choice of 2 organisations where they can get their aircraft maintained. What are they?
- Part-145 organisation
32. To which persons/organisation must any person or organisation approved under Part-M,
make an occurrence report when they find any identified condition of an aircraft or
component that hazards seriously the flight safety.
33. How soon should any person or organisation approved under Part-M, make an
occurrence report when they find any identified condition of an aircraft or component that
hazards seriously the flight safety.
72 hours
Subpart C
M.A.302
Competent authority
Competent authority
36. What approved organisation can approve their own amendments to the maintenance
programme?
M.A.304
37. What approved organisation (other than EASA) can provide data for modifications and
repairs?
38. What 3 Log Books must be kept in the aircraft’s continuing airworthiness records?
- Aircraft
- Engine
- Propeller
39. The aircraft continuing airworthiness records shall contain what six (6) items of
information?
- status of ADs
40. All detailed maintenance records in respect of the aircraft and any life-limited component
fitted thereto, must be kept for how long after the aircraft or component was permanently
withdrawn from service?
42. List the 5 items of information contained within the Technical Log for each aircraft
Competent authority
Subpart D
M.A.402
45. After what kind of maintenance task must an Independent Inspection be carried out?
M.A.403
46. Any aircraft defect that hazards seriously the flight safety must be rectified by when?
Tech log
M.A.502
Subpart F
M.A.601
Aircraft which are not large and not used for commercial air transport
M.A.606
50. Who has corporate authority for ensuring that all maintenance required by the customer
can be financed and carried out to the standard required by Part-M?
Accountable manager
51. What is the restriction placed on contracted staff working in a Part-M Subpart F
organisation?
52. Maintenance staff within a Part-M organisation who issue certificates of release to
service for aircraft and components shall comply with what Implementing Rule?
M.A.607
53. In the unforeseen cases, where an aircraft is grounded at a location other than the main
base where no appropriate certifying staff is available, the maintenance organisation
contracted to provide maintenance support may issue a one-off certification authorisation
to any person with not less than how many years maintenance experience and holding a
valid ICAO aircraft maintenance licence rated for the aircraft type requiring certification?
3 years
Any significant non-compliance which lowers the safety standards and hazards
seriously the flight safety
Any non-compliance which could lower the safety standard and possibly hazard the
flight safety
Subpart G
M.A.701
Competent authority
M.A.706
Accountable manager
59. The accountable manager of a CAMO for commercial air transport is to be the same
accountable manager for the approved organisation holding what certificate?
M.A.708
CAMO
M.A.710
63. What are the two main functions required in order to complete an Airworthiness Review?
Maximum 90 days
No
M.A.803
66. Under what weight category may the Pilot-Owner of an aircraft issue a certificate of
release to service?
2730 kg
logbook
Subpart I
M.A.901
1 year
Can be extended twice (1 year each time) if the aircraft has been maintained in a
‘controlled environment’
Twice
- suspended or revoked
73. If an aircraft is sold and reregistered in another EU Member state, what happens to the
ARC?
The ARC remains valid until its expiry date, then a new one must be applied for from
the new competent authority (i.e. old one cannot be extended)
Module 10
Licence Category B1 and B2
Aviation Legislation
Aircraft that are engaged in military, customs, police or similar services are considered to be
“State Aircraft” and as such are not subject to EASA Regulations.
Aircraft that fall within the categories set out in Annex II to Regulation
216/2008 are “non-EASA aircraft” types. In addition, individual aircraft
that are operated for certain “State” purposes as set out in Article 1 of
Regulation (EU) No. 216/2008 are subject to national regulations; (e.g.
military aircraft, police aircraft). All other aircraft are “EASA aircraft”
regardless of their State of Design or State of Manufacture.
For both EASA and non-EASA aircraft, CAA and EASA requirements, and requirements notified
by the State of Design of the aircraft, (and its engines, propellers and equipment as applicable)
may be mandatory. Section 1, Part 3 of this CAP 747 identifies the sources of these mandatory
requirements.
Contents
o Aircraft
o Engines
o Propellers
o Equipment
Note: Different manufacturers may use different designators for checks and inspections.
General
Reference number, issue number and date;
Registered name(s) and address(es) of the Owner(s)/Operator(s);
Type and model(s) of aircraft, engines, auxiliary power-units, and, where applicable,
propellers
Areas of operation of the aircraft,
Class of work in relation to the areas of operation;
Registration Marks of aircraft maintained in accordance with the schedule;
Details of any arrangements involving the co-operation of more than one Operator, or
which involve the combination of information from other aircraft fleets for the purpose of
providing additional statistical and sampling material:
Cross reference, where applicable, to the source of the task (e.g. Maintenance
Review Board Report (MRB) and Maintenance Planning Document (MPD));
Periods at which the item shall be inspected, together with the type and degree of
inspection;
The Mandatory Life Limitations, to which certain parts of aircraft, engines, propellers,
auxiliary power units and systems, the failure of which could have a hazardous effect on
the aircraft, are subject. For foreign products these limitations, unless otherwise agreed
by Turkish DGCA, shall be identical to those specified in the Mandatory Life Limitations
section of the Manufacturer’s Recommended Maintenance Programme The limitations
may be itemised in the schedule, or included by reference to the appropriate
airworthiness data;
Such other processes as are agreed by the aviation authority, e.g. condition monitoring.
Reference to the source of the content of the schedule e.g. MRB, MPD, and Aircraft
Maintenance Manual (AMM).
Check cycle criteria - The criteria for ‘packaging’ checks shall be described (e.g. A Check –
400 FH, B Check – 800 FH etc.).
Since the 50-hour Check requires visual inspection of various components in order to assess
their serviceability, it is important that due consideration should be given to the practical aspects
of this task before it is undertaken. It is strongly recommended that guidance be sought from the
licensed aircraft maintenance engineer or the Approved Organisation who normally carry out
the maintenance work on the particular aeroplane.
These work packages are normally referred to as Checks, and are repeated at the intervals
stated for a total of three years, when the C of A will then become due for renewal and the cycle
recommences.
In order to help all those concerned with the maintenance of these aeroplanes, Aircraft, Engine
and Propeller Log Books make provision for a running record to be kept of checks completed,
together with date and hours flown at the time they were completed. From this information it is a
simple task to deduce the hours flown and/or date when the next check will become due.
With regard to the pre-flight inspection it is intended to mean all of the actions necessary to
ensure that the aircraft is fit to make the intended flight. These should typically include but are
not necessarily limited to:
A walk-around inspection of the aircraft and its emergency equipment for condition
including, in particular, any obvious signs of wear, damage or leakage. In addition, the
presence of all required equipment including emergency equipment should be
established.
An inspection of the aircraft continuing airworthiness record system or the operators
technical log as applicable to ensure that the intended flight is not adversely affected by
any outstanding deferred defects and that no required maintenance action shown in the
maintenance statement is overdue or will become due during the flight.
A control that consumable fluids, gases etc. uplifted prior to flight are of the correct
specification, free from contamination, and correctly recorded.
A control that all doors are securely fastened.
A control that control surface and landing gear locks, pitot/static covers, restraint devices
and engine/aperture blanks have been removed.
A control that all the aircraft’s external surfaces and engines are free from ice, snow,
sand, dust etc.
Tasks such as oil and hydraulic fluid uplift and tyre inflation may be considered as part of the
pre-flight inspection. The related pre-flight inspection instructions should address the
procedures to determine where the necessary uplift or inflation results from an abnormal
consumption and possibly requires additional maintenance action by the approved maintenance
organisation or certifying staff as appropriate.
In the case of commercial air transport, an operator should publish guidance to maintenance
and flight personnel and any other personnel performing pre-flight inspection tasks, as
appropriate, defining responsibilities for these actions and, where tasks are contracted to other
organisations, how their accomplishment is subject to the quality system of Part-M M.A.712. It
should be demonstrated to the competent authority that pre-flight inspection personnel have
received appropriate training for the relevant pre-flight inspection tasks. The training standard
for personnel performing the pre-flight inspection should be described in the operator’s
continuing airworthiness management exposition.
Maintenance personnel's initial and continuation training should highlight the critical nature of
conducting maintenance tasks on essential or primary systems. The instruction given should
provide personnel with the necessary information to identify and satisfactorily accomplish such
tasks. Training programmes should focus on safety critical tasks and the possible
consequences of failure to follow the associated maintenance procedures. The development of
these training programmes should use feedback from maintenance experience, to enhance the
programme and maintenance procedures.
Arrangements should
be made to stagger
scheduled
maintenance tasks on
essential or primary
systems such that the
accomplishment of
similar critical tasks on
two or more systems,
are segregated.
Consideration should
be given to introducing
procedures that will
ensure that such tasks
are separated by at
least one flight cycle
Non-Emergency ADs
EASA is responsible for distributing EASA ADs for aircraft subject to European regulations, to
ICAO Contracting States.
Emergency ADs
Where urgency dictates that a short timescale is required to address an unsafe condition,
EASA or NAA will issue an Emergency Airworthiness Directive (EAD).
In accordance with 145.A.30(j)(3): for compliance with a repetitive pre-flight mandatory action,
where the Airworthiness Directive states specifically that the flight crew may carry out the
action, a Part-145 organisation may issue a limited certification authorisation to the aircraft
commander and/or the flight engineer on the basis of the flight crew licence held.
When certifying such an inspection the certifying signature will be that of the person authorised
by the Part-145 organisation and the relevant authorisation reference shall be recorded.
EASA Aircraft
Any application to satisfy an Airworthiness Directive by means of an ‘alternative means of
compliance’ will be assessed by EASA on a case by case basis and will normally need to be
supported by the organisation responsible for the type design. The applicant must demonstrate,
to the satisfaction of the Agency, an equivalent level of safety. A request for an AMOC should
be made using an EASA Form 42.
EASA allows automatic acceptance of certain AMOCs issued by the airworthiness authorities of
Canada, Brazil and the United States of America, where that country is the State of Design for
the product, part or appliance.
Non-EASA Aircraft
Any application to satisfy an Airworthiness Directive by means of an ‘alternative means of
compliance’ will be assessed by the competent authority on a case by case basis and will
normally need to be supported by the organisation responsible for the type design.
The applicant must demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the competent authority, an equivalent
level of safety.
Part 21A.3B
An airworthiness directive means a document issued or adopted by EASA which mandates
actions to be performed on an aircraft to restore an acceptable level of safety, when evidence
shows that the safety level of this aircraft may otherwise be compromised.
When an airworthiness directive has to be issued by EASA to correct the unsafe condition
referred to above, or to require the performance of an inspection, the holder of the type-
certificate, restricted type- certificate, supplemental type-certificate, major repair design
approval, ETSO authorisation or any other relevant approval deemed to have been issued
under this Regulation, shall:
Propose the appropriate corrective action or required inspections, or both, and submit
details of these proposals to EASA for approval.
Following the approval by EASA of the proposals, make available to all known operators
or owners of the product, part or appliance and, on request, to any person required to
comply with the airworthiness directive, appropriate descriptive data and accomplishment
instructions.
Alert service bulletins are issued by the manufacturer when a condition exists that the
manufacturer feels is a safety related item as opposed to just a product improvement. These
SB's usually result in the National Aviation Authority issuing an AD. The AD will reference the
alert service bulletin as a method of compliance with the airworthiness directive.
If a service bulletin is not an alert service bulletin or a bulletin referenced in an AD, it becomes
optional and may or may not be incorporated by the operator.
SLs, SBs and ASBs will be selected and evaluated for modification by the responsible aircraft
operator and/or the Part-M CAMO and/or Part-145 organisation
Transmittal or cover sheet if additional information may be necessary with the bulletin
Planning information
Compliance
Approval
References
Publication affected
Material information
Accomplishment instruction
Appendices as required
Modifications and repairs as defined in the approved maintenance data of the manufacturer
may be accomplished as shown in the respective data without further approvals.
Modifications and repairs not included in the approved data may not be performed without the
required approval from the responsible authority. An organisation wishing to design its
modifications and repairs must be approved in accordance with Part-21 - Aircraft Certification,
and define all the relevant policies and procedures in a design organisation handbook.
Activities allowed by a design organisation includes the design of minor and major
modifications, repairs to products, parts and appliances as defined in the scope of work of the
design organisation handbook.
Modifications and repairs are treated the same as changes to the relevant type certificate or
supplement type certificate and must be approved according Part-21 subpart D and Part-21
Subpart E respectively.
After each maintenance action performed on aircraft, engine and component a Certificate of
Release to Service/CRS in accordance with Part-145 Paragraph 145.A.50 must be issued and
signed by an appropriately authorised certifying staff
General
This documentation includes all registered instructions held as approved data, which must be
available at the Part-145 organisation. The Part-145 organisation must assure that all
requirements defined in the maintenance documentation can be fulfilled during the maintenance
work.
Compliance with the maintenance documentation is established through the independent quality
system by auditing the processes as defined in Part-145 Paragraph 145.A.65.
Technical manuals are provided to enable maintenance staff to carry out their maintenance
functions with the correct parts, materials, equipment and information. Originally, each
manufacturer presented this information in its own particular manner. Engineers working on the
products of several companies frequently became confused and this led to maintenance errors.
This specification, known as ATA 100, was developed in the 1940s and standardised all aircraft
manufacturers' manuals into one simple format for use world-wide. It enabled the Aircraft
Engineer to find relevant information on a particular subject on any aircraft with ease.
This Specification established a Standard for the presentation of technical data, by an aircraft,
aircraft accessory, or component manufacturer.
In order to standardise the treatment of the subject matter and to simplify the users' problem in
locating instructions, a uniform method of arranging material in all publications has been
developed.
The ATA 100 requirements have now been combined with those of ATA 2100 which concerned
digital data to form ATA iSpec 2200. All aircraft manufacturers now conform to these
requirements.
The requirements of ATA 100 have been revised over the years to reflect changes in aircraft
technology and the ways of maintaining them. Each manual will, therefore, reflect the
requirements in force at the time it was compiled. However, all of the manuals for a particular
aircraft type will be compiled to the same standard.
Each chapter is broken down into sections or sub-systems and subjects or components, each of
which is numbered in a six digit, three part numbering system.
The first element, identifies the chapter number of the major system to which the subject
belongs. This element (first and second digits) is allocated by ATA 100.
The second element is the section number that identifies all of the information pertaining to a
sub-system or group of assemblies. The third digit is allocated by ATA 100, the fourth by the
user. Zeros in either digit represent information relevant to whole system or sub-system
The third element is the subject number that identifies a specific unit or component within a
sub-system or assembly. Number 00-99 allocated by user. Double zeros represent information
relevant to whole subsystem/ subject.
This three part reference will also be valid in all the other manuals relevant to the aircraft type.
Each page has an Effectivity block in the lower left-hand corner. This may contain a number or
code which identifies the aircraft, to which that subject refers, by serial number or registration.
Alternatively it may contain a statement to identify a particular group of aircraft, such as a
description of a configuration or a Service Bulletin (SB) incorporated.
If the Effectivity reads 'ALL' then the subject information relates to all types of equipment or
aircraft covered by the manual. These are listed in the front matter of the manual.
For aircraft with more than one configuration on a particular subject the same reference and
page number may be duplicated with a 'Config' number recorded adjacent to them. Details of
which aircraft the config applies to are found in the Effectivity block.
Maintenance Manuals
The Maintenance Manual contains all the necessary information to enable Aircraft Engineers to
service, troubleshoot, functionally check and repair all systems installed in the aircraft. It
includes information that is necessary for the Engineer to perform maintenance tasks or minor
adjustments to the components on the ramp or in the hangar. The information in the manual
relates to the particular aircraft configuration that is operated by the company. The manual may
also contain data and information provided by the customer in relation to Customer Furnished
Equipment (e.g. furnishings etc.).
The IPC uses the ATA 100 coding system and presents diagrams of structure and equipment
breakdown in disassembly sequence. It includes cut-aways and exploded diagrams with each
individual item numbered. A table for each illustration references the items and give Part
Number, effectivity, quantity, supplier and relationship information for each item.
Compiled in accordance with ATA 100, the SRM comprises 'Structures Group' subject chapters,
51. Structures, 52. Doors, 53. Fuselage, 54. Nacelles/Pylons, 55. Stabilisers, 56. Windows and
57. Wings.
Chapter 51 Structures-General is divided into sections which give generic information on:
The section numbers are assigned sequentially while page blocks are allocated as:
The other chapters are divided into sections or structural elements relevant to the subjects, e.g.
The sections are divided into numbered subjects which are common across the chapters and
are used as applicable to the particular structural element, e.g.
Damage beyond the limits stated in the SRM or the structures not specified in the SRM may
only be performed in accordance with instructions from the manufacturer or an approved design
organisation.
All Wiring Diagrams are shown, unless otherwise specified, with the aircraft on the ground, after
normal flight, with the shutdown checklist complete (power off).
The WDM should be used in conjunction with the manufacturers generic Chapter 20 Standard
Wiring (or Electrical) Practices Manual.
Each revision is issued with a covering letter (known as a Letter of Transmittal) which details the
revision number, issue date and a list of manual pages to be removed and added by the
revision. Each manual or chapter has a List of Effective Pages which lists every page and its
issue date so that the holder may check that a manual is complete and current. The revision is
incorporated by removing old pages, inserting new ones, filing the List of Effective Pages at the
beginning of the manual or chapter and the Transmittal Letter at the front of the manual. The
revision number and issue date are entered on the ‘Record of Revisions’ page at the front of
each manual.
To check the validity of a page, first check it's issue date against the List of Effective Pages,
then check the List of Effective Pages date against that of the Letter of Transmittal, finally check
the Letter of Transmittal revision number against the current ATP register or contact the
publisher.
In cases where it is necessary to issue information outside the revision cycle, a Temporary
Revision (TR) is published for inclusion in the relevant manual. These TRs are printed on yellow
paper and they remain in the appropriate chapter of the manual until the information is
incorporated through the normal revision process.
Both, a dated Control Page (or list of effective temporary revisions page) for the chapter, and a
List of Effective Control Pages are issued with each TR. The Control Page is filed at the front of
the affected chapter and the List of Effective Control Pages is filed with the List of Effective
Pages.
When an Alert Service Bulletin requires urgent changes to manual information for airworthiness
or safety reasons an Alert, printed on pink paper, is issued and filed in the relevant point in the
manual. Alerts are also recorded on the Control Page.
To check the validity of a TR or Alert, first check its issue number against the Control Page,
then check the Control Page date against that of the List of Effective Control Pages, finally
check the List of Effective Control Pages revision number against the current ATP register or
contact the publisher.
If the manual is held on microfilm or CD-ROM the TRs, Alerts and their control pages are filed in
a Manual Supplement book held adjacent to the reading machine. This must be consulted
whenever the manual is used.
If the manual is held on a network computer system, provision for access to the current TRs and
Alerts and for checking their validity will be made.
The ability to store and retrieve data digitally has led to the development of various systems
such as Boeing's "Portable Maintenance Aid" (PMA) and "AirN@v " from Airbus to streamline
the often time-consuming process of troubleshooting modern, complex aircraft. The systems
provides all the necessary line maintenance documentation in digital format along with a
powerful search capability. The application includes specialized process-oriented features
tailored to how each document is used. References within and between documents are
hyperlinked to further minimize cross-referencing time.
With an off-the-shelf or ruggedized Laptop computer the information is now at the mechanic’s
fingertips on the ramp, at line stations or on-board the aircraft. The interfaces are generally
Windows based and are intuitive requiring minimal training. The systems generally contain
customised versions of the following documents:
Combined index.
Maintenance tips, service letters, and in-service activity reports.
Dispatch deviation procedures.
In future it may be possible to access this information from the on-board Maintenance Access
Terminal or flight deck displays of modern glass cockpit aircraft.
This method entails one publication being reproduced, on a roll of film and contained in a
special cartridge case, approximately three inches (76 mm) square. The pages are sequentially
copied onto the film and wound upon a drum, within the cartridge case.
A microfilm ‘Reader’ (a projector) is used, to wind the film through a ‘gate’ and display a single
page of text/drawing upon a screen, which is large enough to enable the text and illustrations to
be read and understood.
Because of the condensing of the ‘hard copy’ books into a small space; a complete set of
maintenance manuals can, thus, be contained in a small number of microfilm cartridges which
can be stored close to the Reader.
A number of these projectors are provided with a printing facility that allows the person, reading
the film, to print a copy of any sheets which contain information that is required away from the
machine. All copies, removed from the microfilm reading room, must be used once only, and not
retained for later work. This practise ensures that amendments and updates are not missed.
The Reader is similar to the microfilm Reader except that the film slide is moved about, beneath
the viewing lens, until the relevant page appears upon the screen.
By simply pressing a button on the machine, a photocopy of the page being viewed can be
produced for remote use and, once again, any copies should not be retained for future use.
Amendment of both this and the microfilm system is by direct replacement, with local disposal of
the unwanted items.
Computer CD-ROM
The use of computers, with respect to aircraft maintenance manuals, (and other publications),
has the primary advantage of the huge amount of information that can be stored on one
Compact Disc (CD).
A single computer, located within a maintenance facility, could have all the necessary
publications (such as the Maintenance Manual, Illustrated Parts Catalogue and Wiring
Diagrams), for the relevant aircraft type, held on one CD.
As with the other two systems, there should be the facility to print the necessary information
required with, of course, the limitation that the information is only valid ‘on-the-day’, and must
not be used for repetitive jobs.
Supplementary Information
It is important that only the current issue, of whichever system is in use, is supplied to servicing
technicians. This means that the amendment procedures must be carefully monitored (and
especially the disposal of the out-dated material). The new amendments come with a ‘Letter of
Transmittal’, from the relevant authority, in exactly the same manner as they do with the ‘hard
copy’ technical publications.
Because of the need to dispose of large amounts of information, whenever even a minor update
or amendment is carried out, it is normal to produce Supplementary Information in hard copy
form, as an intermediate source of current information. These issues are in addition to either the
film/fiche/CD-ROM systems in use and must be not only carefully monitored, but also well
publicised.
This ensures that the technicians know that the information, contained in the system they are
using, could, possibly, contain small items of out-of-date information.
This subject is described in detail in Subsection 10.4. To avoid content duplication, please refer
to that section.
An aircraft must be of a type approved by EASA or Turkish DGCA for the issue of a
Certificate of Airworthiness.
The continuing airworthiness of any aircraft will be managed in accordance with
procedures equivalent to the requirements for public transport in accordance with SHY-M
/EASA Part-M Subpart G, as applicable.
An aircraft are to be operated in accordance with a flight manual, the content of which
has been approved under the type certificate, supplemental type certificate or Turkish
DGCA approved modification procedure. Any changes to the flight manual must be
approved by Turkish DGCA or alternatively approved by EASA and accepted by Turkish
DGCA, in accordance with Part-21 as appropriate.
Changes (modifications and repairs) to State aircraft must be approved by Turkish DGCA
or alternatively approved by EASA and accepted by Turkish DGCA, in accordance with
Part-21 as appropriate.
handling characteristics are satisfactory and have not deteriorated with time;
aircraft performance remains as scheduled;
the aircraft and its equipment function correctly.
Test Flights are a mandatory requirement prior to the issue of a Certificate of Airworthiness for
an aircraft being imported into an EASA Member State.
All flight tests are established in accordance with the applicable Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM)
and the production flight test manual provided by the aircraft manufacturer.
Flight tests are performed under the authority of the operator by a special qualified crew based
on flight test criteria established under the responsibility of the operator. A full flight test may be
necessary after major maintenance work or after any important work following an incident or
accident.
For some maintenance tasks, the manufacturer prescribes in the aircraft's Maintenance Manual
the need for check flights to be carried out. For other tasks involving, for example, work carried
out on a system or component the correct functioning of which is affected by flight dynamics, air
loads, airflows, or low temperatures and pressures, the certifying engineer will need to
determine if a maintenance check flight is required to verify its operation.
The suitability of pilots conducting maintenance check flights and appropriate safety precautions
must be addressed.
Before any test flight it must be positively assured throughout investigations, inspections,
corrective work or ground testing, as applicable that any complained condition and/or function
has been as far as possible corrected.
A reduced flight test may be requested after corrective maintenance actions or modifications on
important items which may affect the flight characteristic, the performance of the aircraft or flight
environments such as airspeed, Mach number, altitude, temperature, operational loads or
elastic deformation which cannot be forecasted by ground checks and/or measurements.
A certificate of release to service must be provided before a test flight. A copy of the flight test
report must be kept by the CAMO and Part-145 organisation.
The principles and safety considerations that follow are applicable for both required and elective
check flights for continuing airworthiness management. These check flights do not include
maintenance check flights for specific items.
the aircraft and its equipment function satisfactorily and the aircraft continues to comply
with its type design standard.
(a) Handling tests, including the effectiveness of primary controls and trimmers, with specific
direction (see Note) to evaluate the characteristics during the following phases of flight:
Take-off;
Climb;
Cruise;
Flight at maximum speed;
Flight at minimum speed;
Descent;
Landing;
Hover manoeuvres for helicopters.
NOTE: If not directed to evaluate characteristics, many pilots would compensate and adapt to
deficient characteristics.
Simple, free air pressure rate-of-climb measurements under known and predicted
configurations and conditions.
Measurement of low speed warnings and, if applicable, stall speeds.
(c) Tests to check functioning of the aircraft equipment in flight and safe, recoverable
functioning of back-up systems, e.g. emergency gear lowering, use of alternate braking
systems. Note that controls, systems and equipment which are used regularly may be
Check Flight Schedules which meet the above criteria will be created and maintained by Turkish
DGCA (in conjunction with the aircraft manufacturer) where required for check flights for EASA
and non-EASA aircraft. Should an operator wish to develop an alternative schedule for required
check flights, this may be done provided that it incorporates all elements of Turkish DGCA
schedule and, in particular, the Check Flight Certificate. Examples may be found in Turkish
DGCA guidance material for the conduct of check flights, namely the Turkish DGCA’s Check
Flight Handbook. Any alternative schedule, when used for required check flights, should have
been reviewed and accepted by Turkish DGCA Aircraft Certification Department; in seeking any
such agreement, the operator should include details of arrangements for periodic review of his
schedules.
Schedules are available for most aircraft types (and variants thereof) above 5700 kg. However,
for certain categories of aeroplanes below 5700 kg, Turkish DGCA has produced generic
schedules, which can be used for a range of aeroplane types.
Pilot acceptance criteria and procedures for conducting check flights should be included in the
continuing airworthiness management exposition in accordance with SHY-M/EASA Part
M.A.704 where applicable. Though it is not feasible to lay down absolute experience and ability
requirements for pilots, guidelines are provided in Turkish DGCA Check Flight Handbook.
Definition
Extended range operations by aircraft with two turbine power units (ETOPS or EROPS) are
sometimes necessary to permit twin engine aircraft to operate over very long sectors where the
range from a suitable alternate aerodrome will exceed the maximum laid down in regulations.
This maximum is laid down by national authorities and is normally the distance corresponding to
60 minutes flight time at the single engine cruise speed.
In this context, a suitable alternate aerodrome may be defined as one that has runways of
sufficient length and strength to permit safe landing; possesses all the appropriate ancillary
services (lighting, communications, emergency services, weather reporting, navigation facilities
etc.) to permit a safe approach and landing; will be open for a period which covers the range of
possible times of arrival; and which is forecast to have weather suitable to permit a landing
throughout that period.
Extended range Twin engine OPerationS (ETOPS) is defined as an operation available for
two-engined aircraft conducted over a route that contains a point further than approved
threshold time at the approved one-engine out cruise speed (under standard conditions) from
an adequate airport.
The operator’s ETOPS flights are conducted in accordance with the aircraft manufacturers
approved standards for ETOPS. These standards present aircraft design configuration,
maintenance tasks, crew procedures and dispatch limitations for ETOPS.
There are two operational criteria: 60-minutes to 120-minutes, and 120-minutes to 180-minutes.
Unless the operation has been specifically approved by the State of the Operator, an aeroplane
with two turbine power-units shall not, except as provided, be operated on a route where the
flight time at single engine cruise speed to an adequate en-route alternate aerodrome exceeds
a threshold time established for such operations by that State.
In approving the operation, the State of the Operator shall ensure that:
In order to maintain the required level of safety on routes where an aeroplane with two power-
units is permitted to operate beyond the threshold time, it is necessary that:
Part-OPS SPA.ETOPS
EASA AMC-20
The ETOPS requires special attention for the maintenance work to be performed on aircraft
operating under these rules. Certain maintenance task may not be performed during the same
ground time on ETOPS related systems. In addition if same tasks need to be performed it has
to be assured that not the same person performs the same task on equal aircraft systems or
components.
If the requirements as specified above may not be guaranteed, a verification flight has to be
performed. A verification flight is planned as a non-ETOPS flight. If all aircraft system work
properly after the take-off and for the prescribed time in cruise, that flight may then be continued
under ETOPS rules.
The maintenance work affected by ETOPS rules are defined in the ETOPS manual.
Maintenance work which is defined as ETOPS related must be marked on the work paper as
such.
The ETOPS manual is approved by the responsible authority and contains the definitions,
guidance and special procedures to support the intended operation.
The maintenance programme should contain the standards, guidance, and direction necessary
to support the intended operations. Maintenance personnel involved should be made aware of
the special nature of ETOPS and have the knowledge, skills and ability to accomplish the
requirements of the programme.
An ETOPS service check should be developed to verify that the status of the aircraft and certain
critical items are acceptable. This check should be accomplished and signed off by an ETOPS
qualified maintenance person immediately prior to an ETOPS flight.
The Technical Log should be reviewed and documented as appropriate to ensure proper MEL
procedures, deferred items and maintenance checks, and that system verification procedures
have been properly performed.
ETOPS Manual
The operator should develop a manual for use by personnel involved in ETOPS. This manual
need not include, but should at least reference, the maintenance programme and other
requirements described by this Appendix, and clearly indicate where they are located in the
operator’s manual system. All ETOPS requirements, including supportive programme
procedures, duties and responsibilities, should be identified and be subject to revision control.
This manual should be submitted to the Authority 30-days before implementation of ETOPS
flights. Alternatively the operator may include this information in existing manuals used by
personnel involved in ETOPS.
Reliability Programme
An ETOPS reliability programme should be developed or the existing reliability programme
supplemented. This programme should be designed with early identification and prevention of
ETOPS related problems as the primary goal.
The programme should be event-orientated and incorporate reporting procedures for significant
events detrimental to ETOPS flights. This information should be readily available for use by the
operator and the Authority to help establish that the reliability level is adequate, and to assess
the operator’s competence and capability to safely continue ETOPS. The Authority should be
notified within 96 hours of events reportable through this programme.
In addition to the items addressed by CAP 418 (Condition Monitored Maintenance) for routine
reliability reporting, the following items should be included:
In-flight shutdowns.
Diversion or turn back.
Uncommanded power changes or surges.
Inability to control the engine or obtain desired power.
Problems with systems critical to ETOPS.
Any other event detrimental to ETOPS.
Introduction
Issues such as All Weather Operations (AWOPS), Reduced Vertical Separation Minima (RVSM)
etc. are operational issues, not used by everyone. They do, however, have specific
maintenance requirements in order to maintain their accuracy. As such, any of these
maintenance requirements must be included in the Maintenance Schedule.
All Weather Operations refers to the requirements for Instrument Landing Systems (ILS), both
airborne and ground based equipment.
Decision Height
A decision height (DH) or decision altitude (DA) is a specified lowest height or altitude in the
approach descent at which, if the required visual reference to continue the approach (such as
the runway markings or runway environment) is not visible to the pilot, the pilot must initiate a
missed approach.
Smaller aircraft generally are equipped to fly only a CAT I ILS. On larger aircraft, these
approaches typically are controlled by the flight control system with the flight crew providing
supervision. CAT I relies only on altimeter indications for decision height, whereas CAT II and
CAT III approaches use radio altimeter (RA) to determine decision height.
An ILS must shut down upon internal detection of a fault condition. Higher categories require
shorter response times; therefore, ILS equipment is required to shut down faster. For example,
a CAT I localizer must shut down within 10 seconds of detecting a fault, but a CAT III localizer
must shut down in less than 2 seconds.
In each case, a suitably equipped aircraft and appropriately qualified crew are required. For
example, CAT IIIB requires a fail-operational system, along with a crew who are qualified and
current, while CAT I does not. A head-up display (HUD) which allows the pilot to perform aircraft
manoeuvres rather than an automatic system is considered as fail-operational. A head-up
display allows the flight crew to fly the aircraft using the guidance cues from the ILS sensors
such that if a safe landing is in doubt, the crew can respond in an appropriate and timely
manner. HUD is becoming increasingly popular with "feeder" airlines and most manufacturers of
regional jets are now offering HUDs as either standard or optional equipment. A HUD can
provide capability to take off in low visibility.
Some commercial aircraft are equipped with automatic landing systems that allow the aircraft to
land without transitioning from instruments to visual conditions for a normal landing. Such
autoland operations require specialized equipment, procedures and training, and involve the
aircraft, airport, and the crew. Autoland is the only way some major airports such as Paris-
Charles de Gaulle Airport remain operational every day of the year. Some modern aircraft are
equipped with enhanced vision systems based on infrared sensors, which provide a day-like
visual environment and allow operations in conditions and at airports that would otherwise not
be suitable for a landing. Commercial aircraft also frequently use such equipment for take-offs
when take-off minima are not met.
For both automatic and HUD landing systems, the equipment requires special approval for its
design and also for each individual installation. The design takes into consideration additional
safety requirements for operating an aircraft close to the ground and the ability of the flight crew
to react to a system anomaly. The equipment also has additional maintenance requirements to
ensure that it is capable of supporting reduced visibility operations.
General
An aeroplane with basic airworthiness approval for IFR operations is eligible to perform ILS
precision approaches down to a decision height of 60 m (200 ft.), assuming that the necessary
ILS receiver(s) and instruments and their installation have been approved.
The purpose of this is to specify the supplementary airworthiness requirements for the
performance of ILS precision approaches with decision heights below 60 m (200 ft.) down to
30 m (100 ft.). This material may not be appropriate to other precision approach aids.
Installed Equipment
The approach guidance system must include:
Two ILS glide path and localiser receivers with indication at each pilot’s station.
An automatic approach coupler or a flight director system with display at each pilot’s
station (or an alternative giving equivalent performance and safety).
A visual indication at each pilot’s station (e.g. an alert light) when the aeroplane reaches
the pre-selected decision height appropriate to the approach.
General
An aeroplane with basic airworthiness approval for IFR operation is eligible to perform ILS
precision approaches down to a decision height of 60 m (200 ft.), assuming that the necessary
ILS receiver(s) and instruments and their installation have been approved.
The purpose of this Subpart is to specify the supplementary airworthiness criteria for aeroplanes
to perform ILS precision approaches with decision heights below 30 m (100 ft.) or with no
decision height.
Equipment
The following items of equipment must be installed for certification to the decision heights
specified unless it is shown that the intended level of safety is achieved with alternative
equipment, or the deletion of some items:
NOTE: This list is based on experience with conventional medium and large jet transports and it
is recognised that changes may be appropriate in significantly different applications.
Two ILS glide path and localizer receivers with the first pilot’s station receiving
information from one, and the second pilot’s station receiving information from the other.
A visual indication at each pilot’s station (e.g. an alert light) when the aeroplane reaches
the pre-selected decision height appropriate to the approach.
In the case of aeroplanes having a minimum flight crew of two pilot’s, an automatic voice
system, which calls when an aeroplane is approaching the decision height (or when
approaching the ground during a no decision height approach) and when it reached decision
height.
NOTE: The number of ILS receivers and radio altimeters may need to be increased in order to
provide fail-operational capability where required.
Automatic throttle control, unless it can be shown that the speed control does not add
excessively to the crew work-load; and
Automatic ground roll control or head-up ground roll guidance as appropriate to the limitations
on visibility conditions or RVR.
(a)
10%
4. How must companies service safety critical systems to avoid compromising the
redundancy of an aircraft’s systems?
5. Why does the pre-flight differ from all other maintenance inspections?
11. What is the maximum distance a non-ETOPS approved aircraft may fly from an adequate
aerodrome?
1 hour
12 What are the two operational criteria for an ETOPS approved aeroplane?
13 What Annex of ICAO sets out the ICAO Regulation regarding ETOPS?
Annex 6
14. In what 2 EASA Regulation document is the ETOPS regulations set out?
15. List the Manuals that will be affected for an ETOPS aircraft
16. Who approves the ETOPS manual and when should it be submitted?
17. What items should be reported as part of the ETOPS Reliability Programme?
In-flight shutdowns.
Diversion or turn back.
Uncommanded power changes or surges.
Inability to control the engine or obtain desired power.
Problems with systems critical to ETOPS.
Any other event detrimental to ETOPS.
Ensure that all personnel involved in ETOPS are provided the necessary training so
that the ETOPS maintenance tasks are properly accomplished and to emphasise the
special nature of ETOPS maintenance requirements.
19. Which organisation makes the classifications for all weather operations (ILS)?
ICAO
The distance over which a pilot of an aircraft on the centreline of the runway can
see the runway surface markings delineating the runway or identifying its centre
line. RVR is normally expressed in feet or meters
22. What aircraft instrument is used to measure and display the Decision Height
Rad Alt
23. State the minimum Decision Heights and minimum RVR for the following ILS categories:
24 What and where is the difference between EASA RVR specification and the ICAO RVR
specification?
25. What additional aircraft equipment is mandatory, in order to perform CAT III operations?
Autoland