Project Report Format - VIT Bhopal
Project Report Format - VIT Bhopal
1]
References
Appendices (Additional Information if necessary).
Submitted by
<Font Size 14><Italic>
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
<Font Size 16>
in
PROGRAM OF STUDY
<Font Size 14>
Submitted by
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
in
COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
December 2024
(A typical specimen of Bonafide Certificate)
<Font Style Times New Roman>
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
<Font Style Times New Roman – size -16>
CANDIDATES. (Register No :)” who carried out the project work under my
supervision. Certified further that to the best of my knowledge the work reported at
this time does not form part of any other project/research work based on which a
degree or award was conferred on an earlier occasion on this or any other candidate.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost I would like to thank the Lord Almighty for His presence and immense blessings
Aeronautical Science for much of his valuable support encouragement in carrying out this work.
I would like to thank my internal guide Mr./Ms._____________,for continually guiding and actively
I would like to thank all the technical and teaching staff of the School of Aeronautical Science, who
Last, but not least, I am deeply indebted to my parents who have been the greatest support while I
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
<Font Style Times New Roman 16 - bold>
LIST OF TABLES
ABSTRACT
The abstract should represent the synopsis of the project. The content of the abstract should be in
font Times New Roman with size 14. Line spacing should be double.
[PURPOSE-METHODOLOGY-FINDINGS]
<Font Style Times New Roman 16 - bold>
TABLE OF CONTENTS (SPECIMEN)
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE NO.
NO.
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Motivation for the work .
1.3 [About Introduction to the project
.
including techniques]
.
1.5 Problem Statement
1.6 Objective of the work
1.7 Organization of the project
1.8 Summary
2 CHAPTER-2:
RELATED WORK INVESTIGATION
2.1 Introduction
2.2 <Core area of the project>
2.3 Existing Approaches/Methods
2.3.1 Approaches/Methods -1
2.3.2 Approaches/Methods -2
2.3.3 Approaches/Methods -3
2.4 <Pros and cons of the stated Approaches/Methods >
2.5 Issues/observations from investigation
2.6 Summary
3 CHAPTER-3:
REQUIREMENT ARTIFACTS
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Hardware and Software requirements
3.3 Specific Project requirements
3.3.1 Data requirement
3.3.2 Functions requirement
3.3.3 Performance and security requirement
3.3.4 Look and Feel Requirements
3.3.5 ………
3.4 Summary
4 CHAPTER-4:
DESIGN METHODOLOGY AND ITS NOVELTY
4.1 Methodology and goal
4.2 Functional modules design and analysis
4.3 Software Architectural designs
4.4 Subsystem services
4.5 User Interface designs
4.5 ………………..
4.6 Summary
5 CHAPTER-5:
TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION & ANALYSIS
5.1 Outline
5.2 Technical coding and code solutions
5.3 Working Layout of Forms
5.4 Prototype submission
5.5 Test and validation
5.6 Performance Analysis(Graphs/Charts)
5.7 Summary
6 CHAPTER-6:
PROJECT OUTCOME AND APPLICABILITY
6.1 Outline
6.2 key implementations outlines of the System
6.3 Significant project outcomes
6.4 Project applicability on Real-world applications
6.4 Inference
7 CHAPTER-7:
Appendix A
Appendix B
References
<<Font Size -16 Times New Roman Bold, Line Spacing – 1.5>>
Boix et al (1995) used the vectorial model to assess the influence of local breeze and
other meteorological parameters on the ground level concentrations of SO 2 and particulate matters in
the urban area of Castellon-Spain. They reported a decrease in the concentrations of SO 2 and
particulate matters in winter months due to strong prevailing wind while measured concentrations in
summer were higher than recorded in winter months.
Seiber et al (1996) estimated flux values using the ISCST3 model and compared with
CALPUFF for airborne methyl bromide downwind of a treated agricultural field. The ISCST3
model, under predicted concentrations for 76% of data while the CALPUFF model also under
predicted 67% of observations.
Yates et al (1996) also estimated the flux values and observed that ISCST3 model over-
predicted concentrations by a factor of 2 for 67% of data and the CALPUFF over-predicted
concentrations by a factor of 1.6 for over 50% of data.
Anh, et al (1998) present a generic reaction set (GRS) model which offers a convenient
framework for studying the photochemical smog production. The performance of the model has been
found comparable to more detailed photo chemical mechanisms such as the CBM – IV. The
presentation also discusses about the GRS model expansion to include spatial advection and
diffusion in the airshed. The expanded model is implemented on a simple grid of seven stations in
the Sydney monitoring network. Comparison with observed data indicates that the model performs
quite well; in particular, it traces the ozone episodes accurately.
SPECIMEN
REFERENCES
2. Aggarwal A.L, Sivacoumar R. and Goyal SK Air Quality Prediction : influence of model
parameters and sensitivity analysis, Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, 1997, 17(9),
650-655.