Anti-ballistic missile

An anti-ballistic missile (ABM) is a surface-to-air missile

designed to counter ballistic missiles (missile defense). Ballistic
missiles are used to deliver nuclear, chemical, biological, or
conventional warheads in a ballistic flight trajectory. The term
"anti-ballistic missile" is a generic term for a system designed to
intercept and destroy any type of ballistic threat; however, it is
commonly used for systems specifically designed to counter
intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).

Current counter-ICBM systems

There are a limited number of systems worldwide that can
intercept intercontinental ballistic missiles:[a]

The Russian A-135 anti-ballistic missile system

(upgraded in 2017 to A-235)[1] is used for the defense of
A Ground-Based Interceptor of the
Moscow. It became operational in 1995 and was
United States' Ground-Based
preceded by the A-35 anti-ballistic missile system. The
Midcourse Defense system, loaded
system uses Gorgon and Gazelle missiles previously
into a silo at Fort Greely, Alaska, in
armed with nuclear warheads. These missiles have been
updated (2017) and use non-nuclear kinetic interceptors July 2004
instead, to intercept any incoming ICBMs.[1]
The Israeli Arrow 3 system entered operational service in
2017. It is designed for exo-atmosphere interception of
ballistic missiles during the spaceflight portion of their
trajectory, including those of ICBMs.[2] It may also act as
an anti-satellite weapon.
The American Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD)
system, formerly known as National Missile Defense
(NMD), was first tested in 1997 and had its first
successful intercept test in 1999. Instead of using an
explosive charge, it launches a hit-to-kill kinetic projectile
to intercept an ICBM. The current GMD system is
intended to shield the United States mainland against a
limited nuclear attack by a rogue state such as North
Korea. GMD does not have the ability to protect against
an all-out nuclear attack from Russia, as there are
currently only 44 ground-based interceptors available to
counter projectiles headed towards the US.[3][4] (This
interceptor count does not include the THAAD, or Aegis,
or Patriot defenses which provide shorter range defence
Israel's Arrow 3
against incoming projectiles.)
 The Aegis ballistic missile defense-equipped SM-3 Block II-A missile demonstrated it can
shoot down an ICBM target on 16 Nov 2020.[5]
In a November 2020 test, the US launched a surrogate ICBM from Kwajalein Atoll
toward Hawaii in the general direction of the continental US, which triggered a satellite
warning to a Colorado Air Force base.[6] In response, USS John Finn launched a missile
which destroyed the surrogate ICBM, while still outside the atmosphere.[6][7]

American plans for Central European site

During 1993, a symposium was held by western European nations to discuss potential future ballistic
missile defence programs. In the end, the council recommended deployment of early warning and
surveillance systems as well as regionally controlled defence systems.[8] During spring 2006 reports
about negotiations between the United States, Poland, and the Czech Republic were published.[9] The
plans propose the installation of a latest generation ABM system with a radar site in the Czech Republic
and the launch site in Poland.[9] The system was announced to be aimed against ICBMs from Iran and
North Korea.[9] This caused harsh comments by Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Organization for
Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) security conference during spring 2007 in Munich. Other
European ministers commented that any change of strategic weapons should be negotiated on NATO
level and not 'unilaterally' [sic, actually bilaterally] between the U.S. and other states (although most
strategic arms reduction treaties were between the Soviet Union and U.S., not NATO). The German
foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, a Social Democrat, expressed severe concerns about the way in
which the U.S. had conveyed its plans to its European partners and criticised the U.S. administration for
not having consulted Russia prior to announcing its endeavours to deploy a new missile defence system
in Central Europe.[10] According to a July 2007 survey, a majority of Poles were opposed to hosting a
component of the system in Poland.[11] By 28 July 2016 Missile Defense Agency planning and
agreements[9] had clarified enough to give more details about the Aegis Ashore sites in Romania (2014)
and Poland (2018).[12]

Current tactical systems

People's Republic of China

Historical Project 640

Project 640 had been the PRC's indigenous effort to develop ABM capability.[13] The Academy of Anti-
Ballistic Missile & Anti-Satellite was established from 1969 for the purpose of developing Project
640.[13] The project was to involve at least three elements, including the necessary sensors and
guidance/command system, the Fan Ji (FJ) missile interceptor, and the XianFeng missile-intercepting
cannon.[13] The FJ-1 had completed two successful flight tests during 1979, while the low-altitude
interceptor FJ-2 completed some successful flight tests using scaled prototypes.[13] A high altitude FJ-3
interceptor was also proposed. Despite the development of missiles, the programme was slowed down
due to financial and political reasons. It was finally closed down during 1980 under a new leadership of
Deng Xiaoping as it was seemingly deemed unnecessary after the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty
between the Soviet Union and the United States and the closure of the US Safeguard ABM system.[13]

Operational Chinese system

In March 2006, China tested an interceptor system comparable to the U.S. Patriot missiles.[14][15][16]

China has acquired and is license-producing the S-300PMU-2/S-300PMU-1 series of terminal ABM-
capable SAMs. China-produced HQ-9 SAM system[17] may possess terminal ABM capabilities. PRC
Navy's operating modern air-defense destroyers known as the Type 052C Destroyer and Type 051C
Destroyer are armed with naval HQ-9 missiles.

The HQ-19, similar to the THAAD, was first tested in 2003, and subsequently a few more times,
including in November 2015.[18] The HQ-29, a counterpart to the MIM-104F PAC-3, was first tested in
2011.[19]

Surface-to-air missiles that supposedly have some terminal ABM capability (as opposed to midcourse
capability):

HQ-29[20]
HQ-19[20]
HQ-18[21]
HQ-15[22]

Development of midcourse ABM in China

The technology and experience from the successful anti-satellite test using a ground-launched interceptor
during January 2007 was immediately applied to current ABM efforts and development.[23][24]

China carried out a land-based anti-ballistic missile test on 11 January 2010. The test was exoatmospheric
and done in midcourse[25] phase and with a kinetic kill vehicle. China is the second country after US that
demonstrated intercepting ballistic missile with a kinetic kill vehicle, the interceptor missile was a SC-
19.[25][26] The sources suggest the system is not operationally deployed as of 2010.[25][27]

On 27 January 2013, China did another anti ballistic missile test. According to the Chinese Defence
Ministry, the missile launch is defensive in character and is not aimed against any countries. Experts
hailed China's technological breakthrough because it is difficult to intercept ballistic missiles that have
reached the highest point and speed in the middle of their course. Only two countries, including the US,
have successfully conducted such a test in the past decade.[28]

On 4 February 2021, China successfully conducted mid-course intercept anti-ballistic missile test.
Military analysts indicates that the test and dozens done before reflects China's improvement in the
area.[29][30]

Rumored midcourse missiles:

DN-3
DN-2
 DN-1
HQ-26[20]

Europe

Aster
The Aster is a family of missiles jointly developed by France and
Italy. The Aster 30 variants are capable of ballistic missile defense.
An export customer, the United Kingdom also operates the Aster
30 Block 0.

On 18 October 2010, France announced a successful tactical ABM

test of the Aster 30 missile[31] and on 1 December 2011 a
successful interception of a Black Sparrow ballistic target Royal Navy Type 45 destroyers
missile.[32][33] The Horizon-class frigates in French and Italian (pictured), and French Navy and
service, the Royal Navy's Type 45 destroyers, and the French and Italian Navy Horizon and FREMM
Italian FREMM-class frigates are all armed with PAAMS (or frigates operate Aster 30 missiles
variants of it) integrating Aster 15 and Aster 30 missiles. France
and Italy are developing a new variant, the Aster 30 Block II,
which can destroy ballistic missiles up to a maximum range of 3,000 km (1,900 mi). It will incorporate a
kill vehicle warhead.[34]

HYDIS²
Involving France, Italy, Germany and the Netherlands, the HYDIS² (HYpersonic Defence Interceptor
Study) was announced on June 20, 2023 and is a project led by MBDA. It was selected in March 2023
and is partially funded by the European Defense Fund (EDF). Its aim is to propose an architecture and
technology maturation concept study for an endo-atmospheric interceptor to counter new, highly
sophisticated emerging threats. HYDIS² is centered around the MBDA's Aquila hypersonic missile
interceptor concept and will involve a consortium of 19 partners and over 30 subcontractors from 14
European countries.[35] France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands have already confirmed their support
and commitment, by signing a letter of intent and agreeing to initial joint requirements.[36] The ultimate
goal of the project is to develop a countermeasure that could be integrated into the French-led EU
TWISTER (Timely Warning and Interception with Space-based TheatER surveillance) capability
program. TWISTER, launched in 2019 with MBDA France acting as lead contractor as well, is intended
to be an air defense system capable of early warning, tracking and intercepting high-performance air
threats, including defense against ballistic missiles (BMD) and hypersonic vehicles.[37][38] The program
involves France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Finland and Germany.[39]

EU HYDEF
Competing against HYDIS², the EU HYDEF (European Hypersonic Defence Interceptor) also covers the
concept phase to develop an endo-atmospheric interceptor and is related to TWISTER. Selected in July
2022, it is also partially funded by the EDF. It is coordinated by Spain's SENER Aeroespacial Sociedad
Anonima, while Germany's Diehl Defence is serving as the overall technical lead. They are heading a
consortium of partners and subcontractors from various EU countries.[38]

India

India has an active ABM development effort using indigenously

developed and integrated radars, and indigenous missiles.[40] In
November 2006, India successfully conducted the PADE (Prithvi
Air Defence Exercise) in which an anti-ballistic missile, called the
Prithvi Air Defence (PAD), an exo-atmospheric (outside the
atmosphere) interceptor system, intercepted a Prithvi-II ballistic
missile. The PAD missile has the secondary stage of the Prithvi
missile and can reach altitude of 80 km (50 mi). During the test,
the target missile was intercepted at a 50 km (31 mi) altitude.[41]
On 6 December 2007, the Advanced Air Defence (AAD) missile
system was tested successfully.[42] This missile is an endo-
atmospheric interceptor with an altitude of 30 km (19 mi). First
reported in 2009, the Defence Research and Development
Organisation (DRDO) is developing a new Prithvi interceptor
missile code-named PDV. The PDV is designed to take out the
target missile at altitudes above 150 km (93 mi).[43] The first PDV
Second phase of Anti-ballistic was successfully test fired on 27 April 2014.[44] According to
Missile defense test with AD-1 scientist V K Saraswat of the DRDO, the missiles will work in
missile tandem to ensure a hit probability of 99.8 percent.[45] On 15 May
2016, India successfully launched AAD renamed Ashwin from
Abdul Kalam Island off the coast of Odisha.[46] As of 8 January
2020, the BMD programme has been completed and the Indian Air Force and the DRDO are awaiting
government's final approval before the system is deployed to protect New Delhi and then Mumbai. After
these two cities, it will be deployed in other major cities and regions.[47] India has structured a five-layer
missile shield for Delhi as of 9 June 2019:[48]

PAD and PDV are designed for mid-course interception, while AAD is for terminal phase interception.[49]

1. Outermost BMD layer at endo- and exo-atmospheric altitudes (15–25 km, and 80–100 km)
for 2,000 km ranges
2. Project Kusha and S-400 layer at ranges of 150, 250, 350 & 400 km
3. Akash-NG, Barak-8 layer at ranges of 70, 80, & 100 km
4. Akash layer at ranges of 25–30 km
5. Surface to air missiles and gun systems as the inner-most ring of defense. Previously
planned to acquire NASAMS-II.[50][51] But Indian Air Force deterred by high cost is now
looking at domestic alternative (potentially land-based VL-SRSAM).[52][53]
The current Phase-1 of the Indian ABM system can intercept ballistic missiles of range up to 2,000 km
and the Phase-2 will increase it up to 5,000 km.[54]

Iran
Iran used Arman and S-300 missile systems for ballistic missile
defense.[55][56]

Israel

Arrow 2
The Arrow project was begun after the U.S. and Israel agreed to Iranian made Arman anti-ballistic
missile interceptor.
co-fund it on 6 May 1986.[57]

The Arrow ABM system was designed and constructed in Israel

with financial support by the United States by a multibillion-dollar
development program called "Minhelet Homa" (Wall Administration) with
the participation of companies like Israel Military Industries, Tadiran and
Israel Aerospace Industries.

During 1998 the Israeli military conducted a successful test of their Arrow
missile. Designed to intercept incoming missiles travelling at up to 2-
mile/s (3 km/s), the Arrow is expected to perform much better than the
Patriot did in the Gulf War. On 29 July 2004 Israel and the United States
carried out a joint experiment in the US, in which the Arrow was launched
against a real Scud missile. The experiment was a success, as the Arrow An Arrow 2 anti-ballistic
destroyed the Scud with a direct hit. During December 2005 the system missile interceptor
was deployed successfully in a test against a replicated Shahab-3 missile.
This feat was repeated on 11 February 2007.[58]

Arrow 3
The Arrow 3 system is capable of exo-atmosphere interception of
ballistic missiles, including of ICBMs.[2] It also acts as an anti-
satellite weapon.

Lieutenant General Patrick J. O'Reilly, Director of the US Missile

Defense Agency, said: "The design of Arrow 3 promises to be an
extremely capable system, more advanced than what we have ever
attempted in the U.S. with our programs."

Arrow 3 in testing.
On 10 December 2015 Arrow 3 scored its first intercept in a complex test designed to validate how the
system can detect, identify, track and then discriminate real from decoy targets delivered into space by an
improved Silver Sparrow target missile.[59] According to officials, the milestone test paves the way
toward low-rate initial production of the Arrow 3.[59]

David’s sling
David's Sling (Hebrew: ‫)קלע דוד‬, also sometimes called Magic
Wand (Hebrew: ‫)שרביט קסמים‬, is an Israel Defense Forces
military system being jointly developed by the Israeli defense
contractor Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and the American
defense contractor Raytheon, designed to intercept tactical
ballistic missiles, as well as medium- to long-range rockets and
slower-flying cruise missiles, such as those possessed by
Hezbollah, fired at ranges from 40 km to 300 km. It is designed
with the aim of intercepting the newest generation of tactical
ballistic missiles, such as Iskander.

Japan
Since 1998, when North Korea launched a Taepodong-1 missile
over northern Japan, the Japanese have been jointly developing a
new surface-to-air interceptor known as the Patriot Advanced
Capability 3 (PAC-3) with the US. Tests have been successful, and
there are 11 locations that are planned for the PAC-3 to be Israel's David's Sling, designed to
installed. The approximate locations are near major air bases, like intercept tactical ballistic missiles
Kadena Air Base, and ammunition storage centers of the Japanese
military. The exact location are not known to the public.[60] A
military spokesman[61] said that tests had been done on two sites, one of
them a business park in central Tokyo, and Ichigaya – a site not far from
the Imperial Palace. Along with the PAC-3, Japan has installed a US-
developed ship-based anti-ballistic missile system, which was tested
successfully on 18 December 2007. Japan has 4 destroyers of this type
capable of carrying RIM-161 Standard Missile 3 and equipped with the
Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System. Japan is currently modifying
another 4 destroyers so that they can take part of their defense force
against ballistic missiles, bringing the total number to 8 ships.[60]

Japanese guided missile

Soviet Union/Russian Federation destroyer JDS Kongō firing
a Standard Missile 3 anti-
The Moscow ABM defense system was designed with the aim of being
ballistic missile.
able to intercept the ICBM warheads aimed at Moscow and other
important industrial regions, and is based on:

A-35 Aldan

ABM-1 Galosh / 5V61[62][63] (decommissioned)[64]

A-35M
 ABM-1B[65] (decommissioned)[64]
A-135 Amur

ABM-3 Gazelle / 53T6[66]

ABM-4 Gorgon / 51T6[67] (decommissioned)[68]
A–235 Nudol (In development)
S-300P (SA-10)
S-300V/V4 (SA-12)
S-300PMU-1/2 (SA-20) S-300PMU-2 vehicles. From left to
right: 64N6E2 detection radar,
S-400 (SA-21)
54K6E2 command post and 5P85
S-300VM (SA-23) TEL.
S-500 Prometey (serial production began in 2021)

United States
In several tests, the U.S. military have demonstrated the feasibility of
destroying long and short range ballistic missiles.[69] Combat
effectiveness of newer systems against 1950s tactical ballistic
missiles seems very high, as the MIM-104 Patriot (PAC-1 and PAC-
2) had a 100% success rate in Operation Iraqi Freedom.[70]

The U.S. Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System (Aegis BMD)
uses RIM-161 Standard Missile 3, which hit a target going faster than
ICBM warheads.[71] On 16 November 2020 an SM-3 Block IIA
interceptor successfully destroyed an ICBM in mid-course, under
Link-16 Command and Control, Battle Management, and
Communications (C2BMC).[72]

The U.S. Army Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)

system began production in 2008.[73] Its stated range as a short to
intermediate ballistic missile interceptor means that it is not designed United States Navy RIM-161
to hit midcourse ICBMs, which can reach terminal phase speeds of Standard Missile 3 anti-ballistic
missile.
mach 8 or greater. The THAAD interceptor has a reported maximum
speed of mach 8, and THAAD has repeatedly proven it can intercept
descending exoatmospheric missiles in a ballistic trajectory.[74]

The U.S. Army Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system was developed by the Missile Defense
Agency. It combines ground-based AN/FPS-132 Upgraded Early Warning Radar installations and mobile
AN/TPY-2 X-band radars with 44 exoatmospheric interceptors stationed in underground silos around
California and Alaska, to protect against low-count ICBM attacks from rogue states. Each Ground-Based
Interceptor (GBI) rocket carries an Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV) kinetic kill interceptor, with 97%
probability of intercept when four interceptors are launched at the target.

Since 2004, the United States Army plans to replace Raytheon's Patriot missile (SAM) engagement
control station (ECS), along with seven other forms of ABM defense command systems, with Integrated
Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System (IBCS) designed to shoot down short, medium, and
intermediate range ballistic missiles in their terminal phase by intercepting with a hit-to-kill
approach.[75][76][77][78] Northrop Grumman was selected as the prime contractor in 2010; the Army spent
$2.7 billion on the program between 2009 and 2020.[79] IBCS engagement stations will support
identification and tracking of targets using sensor fusion from disparate data streams, and selection of
appropriate kill vehicles from available launcher systems.[80][81][82][83][84] In February 2022 THAAD
radar and TFCC (THAAD Fire Control & Communication) demonstrated their interoperability with
Patriot PAC-3 MSE missile launchers, engaging targets using both THAAD and Patriot interceptors.[85]

Republic of China
Procurement of MIM-104 Patriot and indigenous Tien-Kung anti-ballistic missile systems. With the tense
situations with China, Taiwan developed the Sky Bow (or Tien-Kung), this surface-to-air missile can
intercept and destroy enemy aircraft and ballistic missiles.[86] These system was created in partnership
with Raytheon Technologies, using Lockheed Martin ADAR-HP as inspiration to create the Chang Bai
S-band radar system. The missiles have a range of 200 km and was designed to take on fast moving
vehicles with low radar cross-section. The latest variant of this system is the Sky Bow III (TK-3).

South Korea
Since North Korea started developing its nuclear weapon program, South Korea has been under imminent
danger. South Korea started its BDM program by acquiring 8 batteries of the MIM-104 Patriot (PAC-2)
missiles from the United States. The PAC-2 was developed to destroy incoming aircraft and is now
unreliable in defending a ballistic missile attack from North Korea, as they have developed further their
nuclear program. As of 2018, South Korea decided to improve its defense system by upgrading to the
PAC-3, which has a hit-to-kill capability against incoming missiles.[87] The main reason that the South
Korean anti-ballistic defense system is not very developed is because they have tried to developed their
own, without help from other countries, since the beginning of the 1990s.[87] The South Korean Defense
Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) has confirmed that it has test launched the L-SAM system
in February 2022. This particular missile has been in development since 2019 and is South Korea's next
anti-ballistic missile generation. It is expected to have a range of 150 km and be able to intercept targets
between 40 km and 100 km of altitude, and it can also be used as an aircraft interceptor. The L-SAM
system is expected to be complete and ready to use in 2024.[88]

History

1940s and 1950s

The idea of destroying rockets before they can hit their target dates from the first use of modern missiles
in warfare, the German V-1 and V-2 program of World War II.

British fighters destroyed some V-1 "buzz bombs" in flight, although concentrated barrages of heavy anti-
aircraft artillery had greater success. Under the lend-lease program, 200 US 90 mm AA guns with SCR-
584 radars and Western Electric/Bell Labs computers were sent to the UK. These demonstrated a 95%
success rate against V-1s that flew into their range.[89]
The V-2, the first true ballistic missile, has no known record of
being destroyed in the air. SCR-584's could be used to plot the
trajectories of the missiles and provide some warning, but were
more useful in backtracking their ballistic trajectory and
determining the rough launch locations. The Allies launched
Operation Crossbow to find and destroy V-2s before launch, but
these operations were largely ineffective. In one instance a Spitfire
happened upon a V-2 rising through the trees, and fired on it with
no effect.[89] This led to allied efforts to capture launching sites in
Belgium and the Netherlands.

A wartime study by Bell Labs into the task of shooting down

ballistic missiles in flight concluded it was not possible. In order
to intercept a missile, one needs to be able to steer the attack onto
the missile before it hits. A V-2's speed would require guns of 1946 Project Wizard missile
effectively instantaneous reaction time, or some sort of weapon
with ranges on the order of dozens of miles, neither of which
appeared possible. This was, however, just before the emergence
of high-speed computing systems. By the mid-1950s, things had
changed considerably, and many forces worldwide were
considering ABM systems.[90]

The American armed forces began experimenting with anti-missile

missiles soon after World War II, as the extent of German research
into rocketry became clear. Project Wizard began in 1946, with the
aim of creating a missile capable of intercepting the V-2.

But defences against Soviet long-range bombers took priority until

1957, when the Soviet Union demonstrated its advances in ICBM
technology with the launch of Sputnik, the Earth's first artificial
satellite. The US Army accelerated development of their LIM-49 Launch of a US Army Nike Zeus
Nike Zeus system in response. Zeus was criticized throughout its missile, the first ABM system to
development program, especially from those within the US Air enter widespread testing.
Force and nuclear weapons establishments who suggested it would
be much simpler to build more nuclear warheads and guarantee
mutually assured destruction. Zeus was eventually cancelled in 1963.

In 1958, the U.S. sought to explore whether airbursting nuclear weapons might be used to ward off
ICBMs. It conducted several test explosions of low-yield nuclear weapons – 1.7kt boosted fission W25
warheads – launched from ships to very high altitudes over the southern Atlantic Ocean.[91] Such an
explosion releases a burst of X-rays in the Earth's atmosphere, causing secondary showers of charged
particles over an area hundreds of miles across. These can become trapped in the Earth' magnetic field,
creating an artificial radiation belt. It was believed that this might be strong enough to damage warheads
traveling through the layer. This proved not to be the case, but Argus returned key data about a related
effect, the nuclear electromagnetic pulse (NEMP).

Canada
Other countries were also involved in early ABM research. A more advanced project was at CARDE in
Canada, which researched the main problems of ABM systems. A key problem with any radar system is
that the signal is in the form of a cone, which spreads with distance from the transmitter. For long-
distance interceptions like ABM systems, the inherent inaccuracy of the radar makes an interception
difficult. CARDE considered using a terminal guidance system to address the accuracy concerns, and
developed several advanced infrared detectors for this role. They also studied a number of missile
airframe designs, a new and much more powerful solid rocket fuel, and numerous systems for testing it
all. After a series of drastic budget reductions during the late 1950s the research ended. One offshoot of
the project was Gerald Bull's system for inexpensive high-speed testing, consisting of missile airframes
shot from a sabot round, which would later be the basis of Project HARP. Another was the CRV7 and
Black Brant rockets, which used the new solid rocket fuel.

Soviet Union
The Soviet military had requested funding for ABM research as
early as 1953, but were only given the go-ahead to begin
deployment of such a system on 17 August 1956. Their test
V-1000
system, known simply as System A, was based on the V-1000
missile, which was similar to the early US efforts. The first
successful test interception was carried out on 24 November 1960, and the first with a live warhead on 4
March 1961. In this test, a dummy warhead was released by a R-12 ballistic missile launched from the
Kapustin Yar,[92] and intercepted by a V-1000 launched from Sary-Shagan. The dummy warhead was
destroyed by the impact of 16,000 tungsten-carbide spherical impactors 140 seconds after launch, at an
altitude of 25 km (82,000 ft).[93]

The V-1000 missile system was nonetheless considered not reliable enough and abandoned in favour of
nuclear-armed ABMs. Retired V-1000 was used to develop 1Ya2TA sounding rocket, capable of
launching 520 kg scientific payload to an altitude of 400 km.[94] A much larger missile, the Fakel 5V61
(known in the west as Galosh), was developed to carry the larger warhead and carry it much further from
the launch site. Further development continued, and the A-35 anti-ballistic missile system, designed to
protect Moscow, became operational in 1971. A-35 was designed for exoatmospheric interceptions, and
would have been highly susceptible to a well-arranged attack using multiple warheads and radar black-
out techniques.

A-35 was upgraded during the 1980s to a two-layer system, the A-135. The Gorgon (SH-11/ABM-4)
long-range missile was designed to handle intercepts outside the atmosphere, and the Gazelle (SH-
08/ABM-3) short-range missile endoatmospheric intercepts that eluded Gorgon. The A-135 system is
considered to be technologically equivalent to the United States Safeguard system of 1975.[95]

American Nike-X and Sentinel

Nike Zeus failed to be a credible defence in an era of rapidly increasing ICBM counts due to its ability to
attack only one target at a time. Additionally, significant concerns about its ability to successfully
intercept warheads in the presence of high-altitude nuclear explosions, including its own, lead to the
conclusion that the system would simply be too costly for the very low amount of protection it could
provide.
By the time it was cancelled in 1963, potential upgrades had been explored for some time. Among these
were radars capable of scanning much greater volumes of space and able to track many warheads and
launch several missiles at once. These, however, did not address the problems identified with radar
blackouts caused by high-altitude explosions. To address this need, a new missile with extreme
performance was designed to attack incoming warheads at much lower altitudes, as low as 20 km. The
new project encompassing all of these upgrades was launched as Nike-X.

The main missile was LIM-49 Spartan—a Nike Zeus upgraded for longer range and a much larger 5
megaton warhead intended to destroy enemy's warheads with a burst of x-rays outside the atmosphere. A
second shorter-range missile called Sprint with very high acceleration was added to handle warheads that
evaded longer-ranged Spartan. Sprint was a very fast missile (some sources claimed it accelerated to
8,000 mph (13 000 km/h) within 4 seconds of flight—an average acceleration of 90 g) and had a smaller
W66 enhanced radiation warhead in the 1–3 kiloton range for in-atmosphere interceptions.

The experimental success of Nike X persuaded the Lyndon B. Johnson administration to propose a thin
ABM defense, that could provide almost complete coverage of the United States. In a September 1967
speech, Defense Secretary Robert McNamara referred to it as "Sentinel". McNamara, a private ABM
opponent because of cost and feasibility (see cost-exchange ratio), claimed that Sentinel would be
directed not against the Soviet Union's missiles (since the USSR had more than enough missiles to
overwhelm any American defense), but rather against the potential nuclear threat of the People's Republic
of China.

In the meantime, a public debate over the merit of ABMs began. Difficulties that had already made an
ABM system questionable for defending against an all-out attack. One problem was the Fractional
Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) that would give little warning to the defense. Another problem was
high altitude EMP (whether from offensive or defensive nuclear warheads) which could degrade
defensive radar systems.

When this proved infeasible for economic reasons, a much smaller deployment using the same systems
was proposed, namely Safeguard (described later).

Defense against MIRVs

ABM systems were developed initially to counter single warheads launched from large intercontinental
ballistic missiles (ICBMs). The economics seemed simple enough; since rocket costs increase rapidly
with size, the price of the ICBM launching a large warhead should always be greater than the much
smaller interceptor missile needed to destroy it. In an arms race the defense would always win.[90]: 18

In addition to the blast effect, the detonation of nuclear devices against attacking intercontinental ballistic
missiles produces a neutron kill effect from the strong radiation emitted, and this neutralizes the warhead,
or warheads, of the attacking missile.[96] Most A.B.M. devices depend on neutron kill for their
effectiveness.

In practice, the price of the interceptor missile was considerable, due to its sophistication. The system had
to be guided all the way to an interception, which demanded guidance and control systems that worked
within and outside the atmosphere. Due to their relatively short ranges, an ABM missile would be needed
to counter an ICBM wherever it might be aimed. That implies that
dozens of interceptors are needed for every ICBM since warhead's
targets couldn't be known in advance. This led to intense debates
about the "cost-exchange ratio" between interceptors and
warheads.

Conditions changed dramatically in 1970 with the introduction of

multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV)
warheads. Suddenly, each launcher was throwing not one warhead,
Testing of the LGM-118A
but several. These would spread out in space, ensuring that a
Peacekeeper re-entry vehicles, all
single interceptor would be needed for each warhead. This simply
eight shot from only one missile.
added to the need to have several interceptors for each warhead in Each line is the path of a warhead
order to provide geographical coverage. Now it was clear that an which, were it live, would detonate
ABM system would always be many times more expensive than with the explosive power of twenty-
the ICBMs they defended against.[90] five Hiroshima-style weapons.

Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty of 1972

Technical, economic and political problems described resulted in the ABM treaty of 1972, which
restricted the deployment of strategic (not tactical) anti-ballistic missiles.

By the ABM treaty and a 1974 revision, each country was allowed to deploy a mere 100 ABMs to protect
a single, small area. The Soviets retained their Moscow defences. The U.S. designated their ICBM sites
near Grand Forks Air Force Base, North Dakota, where Safeguard was already under advanced
development. The radar systems and anti-ballistic missiles were approximately 90 miles north/northwest
of Grand Forks AFB, near Concrete, North Dakota. The missiles were deactivated in 1975. The main
radar site (PARCS) is still used as an early warning ICBM radar, facing relative north. It is located at
Cavalier Air Force Station, North Dakota.

Brief use of Safeguard in 1975/1976

The U.S. Safeguard system, which utilized the nuclear-tipped LIM-49A Spartan and Sprint missiles, in
the short operational period of 1975/1976, was the second counter-ICBMs system in the world. Safeguard
protected only the main fields of US ICBMs from attack, theoretically ensuring that an attack could be
responded to with a US launch, enforcing the mutually assured destruction principle.

SDI experiments in the 1980s

The Reagan-era Strategic Defense Initiative (often referred to as "Star Wars"), along with research into
various energy-beam weaponry, brought new interest in the area of ABM technologies.

SDI was an extremely ambitious program to provide a total shield against a massive Soviet ICBM attack.
The initial concept envisioned large sophisticated orbiting laser battle stations, space-based relay mirrors,
and nuclear-pumped X-ray laser satellites. Later research indicated that some planned technologies such
as X-ray lasers were not feasible with then-current technology. As research continued, SDI evolved
through various concepts as designers struggled with the difficulty of such a large complex defense
system. SDI remained a research program and was never deployed. Several post-SDI technologies are
used by the present Missile Defense Agency (MDA).
Lasers originally developed for the SDI plan are in use for astronomical observations. Used to ionize gas
in the upper atmosphere, they provide telescope operators with a target to calibrate their instruments.[97]

Tactical ABMs deployed in 1990s

The Israeli Arrow missile system was tested initially during 1990, before the first Gulf War. The Arrow
was supported by the United States throughout the 1990s.

The Patriot was the first deployed tactical ABM system, although it was not designed from the outset for
that task and consequently had limitations. It was used during the 1991 Gulf War to attempt to intercept
Iraqi Scud missiles. Post-war analyses show that the Patriot was much less effective than initially thought
because of its radar and control system's inability to discriminate warheads from other objects when the
Scud missiles broke up during reentry.

Testing ABM technology continued during the 1990s with mixed success. After the Gulf War,
improvements were made to several U.S. air defense systems. A new Patriot, PAC-3, was developed and
tested—a complete redesign of the PAC-2 deployed during the war, including a totally new missile. The
improved guidance, radar and missile performance improves the probability of kill over the earlier PAC-
2. During Operation Iraqi Freedom, Patriot batteries engaged 100% of enemy TBMs within their
engagement territory. Of these engagements, 8 of them were verified as kills by multiple independent
sensors; the remaining was listed as a probable kill due to lack of independent verification. Patriot was
involved in three friendly fire incidents: two incidents of Patriot shootings at coalition aircraft and one of
U.S. aircraft shooting at a Patriot battery.[98]

A new version of the Hawk missile was tested during the early to mid-1990s and by the end of 1998 the
majority of US Marine Corps Hawk systems were modified to support basic theater anti-ballistic missile
capabilities.[99] The MIM-23 Hawk missile is not operational in U.S. service since 2002, but is used by
many other countries.

Soon after the Gulf War, the Aegis Combat System was expanded
to include ABM capabilities. The Standard missile system was
also enhanced and tested for ballistic missile interception. During
the late 1990s, SM-2 block IVA missiles were tested in a theater
ballistic missile defense function.[100] Standard Missile 3 (SM-3)
systems have also been tested for an ABM role. In 2008, an SM-3
missile launched from the Ticonderoga-class cruiser USS Lake
Erie, successfully intercepted a non-functioning satellite.[101][102]
Developed in the late 1990s, the
Lightweight Exo-Atmospheric
Brilliant Pebbles concept
Projectile attaches to a modified
Approved for acquisition by the Pentagon during 1991 but never SM-2 Block IV missile used by the
realized, Brilliant Pebbles was a proposed space-based anti- U.S. Navy
ballistic system that was meant to avoid some of the problems of
the earlier SDI concepts. Rather than use sophisticated large laser
battle stations and nuclear-pumped X-ray laser satellites, Brilliant Pebbles consisted of a thousand very
small, intelligent orbiting satellites with kinetic warheads. The system relied on improvements of
computer technology, avoided problems with overly centralized command and control and risky,
expensive development of large, complicated space defense satellites. It promised to be much less
expensive to develop and have less technical development risk.

The name Brilliant Pebbles comes from the small size of the satellite interceptors and great computational
power enabling more autonomous targeting. Rather than rely exclusively on ground-based control, the
many small interceptors would cooperatively communicate among themselves and target a large swarm
of ICBM warheads in space or in the late boost phase. Development was discontinued later in favor of a
limited ground-based defense.

Transformation of SDI into MDA, development of NMD/GMD

While the Reagan era Strategic Defense Initiative was intended to shield against a massive Soviet attack,
during the early 1990s, President George H. W. Bush called for a more limited version using rocket-
launched interceptors based on the ground at a single site. Such system was developed since 1992, was
expected to become operational in 2010[103] and capable of intercepting small number of incoming
ICBMs. First called the National Missile Defense (NMD), since 2002 it was renamed Ground-Based
Midcourse Defense (GMD). It was planned to protect all 50 states from a rogue missile attack. The
Alaska site provides more protection against North Korean missiles or accidental launches from Russia or
China, but is likely less effective against missiles launched from the Middle East. The Alaska interceptors
may be augmented later by the naval Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System or by ground-based missiles
in other locations.

During 1998, Defense Secretary William Cohen proposed spending an additional $6.6 billion on
intercontinental ballistic missile defense programs to build a system to protect against attacks from North
Korea or accidental launches from Russia or China.[104]

In terms of organization, during 1993 SDI was reorganized as the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization.
In 2002, it was renamed to Missile Defense Agency (MDA).

21st century
On 13 June 2002, the United States withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and recommenced
developing missile defense systems that would have formerly been prohibited by the bilateral treaty. The
action was stated as needed to defend against the possibility of a missile attack conducted by a rogue
state. The next day, the Russian Federation dropped the START II agreement, intended to completely ban
MIRVs.

The Lisbon Summit of 2010 saw the adoption of a NATO program that was formed in response to the
threat of a rapid increase of ballistic missiles from potentially unfriendly regimes, though no specific
region, state, or country was formally mentioned. This adoption came from the recognition of territorial
missile defense as a core alliance objective. At this time, Iran was seen as the likely aggressor that
eventually led to the adoption of this ABM system, as Iran has the largest missile arsenal of the Middle
East, as well as a space program. From this summit, NATO's ABM system was potentially seen as a threat
by Russia, who felt that their ability to retaliate any perceived nuclear threats would be degraded. To
combat this, Russia proposed that any ABM system enacted by NATO must be universal to operate, cover
the entirety of the European continent, and not upset any nuclear parity. The United States actively sought
NATO involvement in the creation of an ABM system, and saw an Iranian threat as a sufficient reason to
warrant its creation. The United States also had plans to create missile defense facilities, but NATO
officials feared that it would have provided protection to Europe, it would have detracted from the
responsibility of NATO for collective defense. The officials also argued the potential prospect of U.S-
commanded operation system that would work in conjunction with the Article 5 defense of NATO.[105]

On 15 December 2016, the US Army SMDC had a successful test of a U.S. Army Zombie Pathfinder
rocket, to be used as a target for exercising various anti-ballistic missile scenarios. The rocket was
launched as part of NASA's sounding rocket program, at White Sands Missile Range.[106]

In November 2020, the US successfully destroyed a dummy ICBM. The ICBM was launched from
Kwajalein Atoll[107][108] in the general direction of Hawaii, triggering a satellite warning to a Colorado
Air Force base, which then contacted the USS John Finn. The ship launched a SM-3 Block IIA missile to
destroy the US dummy, still outside the atmosphere.[109]

See also
2010 Chinese anti-ballistic missile test
Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System
Atmospheric entry
Command systems in the United States Army
Comparison of anti-ballistic missile systems
Indian Ballistic Missile Defence Programme
Kinetic kill vehicle
Missile defense
Anti-torpedo torpedoes
Multiple Kill Vehicle
National Missile Defense
Nuclear disarmament
Nuclear proliferation
Nuclear warfare
Safeguard/Sentinel ABM system
Spartan (missile)
Sprint (missile)
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense

Notes
a. Besides these, some smaller systems exist (tactical ABMs) that generally cannot intercept
intercontinental strategic missiles, as they move too fast for these systems.

Citations
1. ARBATOV, ALEXEY; DVORKIN, VLADIMIR; TOPYCHKANOV, PETR; ZHAO, TONG; BIN,
LI (2017). "ENTANGLEMENT AS A NEW SECURITY THREAT: A RUSSIAN
PERSPECTIVE" (https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26908.6). Entanglement: 11–46.
 2. Israel successfully tests David's Sling's interceptor (http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Israel-suc
cessfully-tests-Davids-Slings-interceptor) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/201305090
60922/http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Israel-successfully-tests-Davids-Slings-interceptor) 9
May 2013 at the Wayback Machine By Yaakov Lappin. Jpost.com, 25 November 2012
3. "There is no guaranteed defence against ballistic missiles—yet" (https://www.economist.co
m/news/united-states/21734465-someone-ought-explain-commander-chief-there-no-guarant
eed-defence). The Economist. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
4. "Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) System" (https://missilethreat.csis.org/system/g
md/). Missile Threat.
5. FTM-44 (17 Nov 2020) U.S. Successfully Conducts SM-3 Block IIA Intercept Test Against an
Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Target (https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/Relea
se/Article/2417334/us-successfully-conducts-sm-3-block-iia-intercept-test-against-an-interco
ntinen/) Flight Test Aegis Weapon System-44 (FTM-44). The C2BMC network detected an
ICBM launch; U.S. Navy sailors aboard the USS John Finn (DDG-113) then launched an
SM-3 Block IIA missile which destroyed the ICBM in mid-course.
6. MDA (18 Nov 2020) FTM-44 mission overview (https://www.mda.mil/video/FTM44PostMissi
onVideo2.mp4) 20-MDA-10624 (Not to scale nor in real time)
7. Kluth, Andreas (29 November 2020). "A Successful U.S. Missile Intercept Ends the Era of
Nuclear Stability" (https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-11-30/a-successful-u-s-
missile-intercept-ends-the-era-of-nuclear-stability). Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 30 November
2020.
8. Assembly of the Western European Union. Technological and Aerospace Committee.
Lenzer. via FAS.Anti-missile defence for Europe – guidelines drawn from the symposium (htt
ps://fas.org/spp/starwars/program/europe/weu_93/weu1363tasc.htm) Archived (https://web.
archive.org/web/20151015200451/http://fas.org/spp/starwars/program/europe/weu_93/weu1
363tasc.htm) 15 October 2015 at the Wayback Machine. 17 May 1993.
9. "MDA International cooperation" (https://www.mda.mil/system/international_cooperation.htm
l). Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20170901154454/https://www.mda.mil/system/inter
national_cooperation.html) from the original on 1 September 2017. Retrieved 11 October
2017.
10. Gaspers, J. (2007). A US Missile Defence Shield in Europe? Opinions and Arguments in the
German Political Debate. Natolin Analyses 7(20)/2007 (https://web.archive.org/web/200809
10223745/http://www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/content-ABM/Natolin_Analiza_7_2007.pdf).
11. "55% Polaków przeciw budowie tarczy (55% of Poles against building the Shield)" (http://wia
domosci.wp.pl/wiadomosc.html?kat=1342&wid=9029388&ticaid=146b1) (in Polish). Polska
Agencja Prasowa. 17 July 2007. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20120120062339/htt
p://wiadomosci.wp.pl/wiadomosc.html?kat=1342&wid=9029388&ticaid=146b1) from the
original on 20 January 2012. Retrieved 7 September 2007.
12. "(28 July 2016) Aegis Ashore" (https://www.mda.mil/global/documents/pdf/aegis_ashore.pdf)
(PDF). Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20171011130348/https://www.mda.mil/global/
documents/pdf/aegis_ashore.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 11 October 2017. Retrieved
11 October 2017.
13. "Project 640: China's National Missile Defence in the '70s" (https://web.archive.org/web/201
11213232047/http://www.sinodefence.com/special/airdefence/project640.asp).
SinoDefence.com. Archived from the original (http://www.sinodefence.com/special/airdefenc
e/project640.asp) on 13 December 2011. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
14. "donga.com[English donga]" (http://english.donga.com/srv/service.php3?bicode=060000&bii
d=2006032829898). English.donga.com. 28 March 2006. Archived (https://web.archive.org/
web/20120620031722/http://english.donga.com/srv/service.php3?bicode=060000&biid=200
6032829898) from the original on 20 June 2012. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
15. "Chinese Version of Patriot Interceptor Said Undergoing Tests" (https://web.archive.org/web/
20120720065356/http://www.missilethreat.com/archives/id.537/detail.asp). MissileThreat. 29
March 2006. Archived from the original (http://www.missilethreat.com/archives/id.537/detail.
asp) on 20 July 2012. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
16. "Pentagon Received No Warning of Chinese Missile Defense Test" (http://www.globalsecurit
ynewswire.org/gsn/nw_20100112_1311.php). Globalsecuritynewswire.org. Archived (https://
web.archive.org/web/20111213234815/http://www.globalsecuritynewswire.org/gsn/nw_2010
0112_1311.php) from the original on 13 December 2011. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
17. "HongQi 9 (HQ-9) Surface-to-Air Missile System" (https://web.archive.org/web/20130904130
239/http://www.sinodefence.com/army/surfacetoairmissile/hongqi9.asp). SinoDefence.com.
3 October 2009. Archived from the original (http://www.sinodefence.com/army/surfacetoairm
issile/hongqi9.asp) on 4 September 2013. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
18. Axe, David (11 November 2015). "Did China Just Test a New Satellite-Killer?" (http://www.th
edailybeast.com/articles/2015/11/11/did-china-just-test-a-new-satellite-killer). The Daily
Beast. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
19. Pike, John. "HQ-29 Anti-Ballistic Missile Interceptor" (http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/wo
rld/china/hq-29.htm). www.globalsecurity.org. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/201708
06195843/http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/world/china/hq-29.htm) from the original on 6
August 2017. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
20. Pike, John. "HQ-19 Anti-Ballistic Missile Interceptor" (http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/wo
rld/china/hq-19.htm). www.globalsecurity.org. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/201707
14092135/http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/world/china/hq-19.htm) from the original on
14 July 2017. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
21. "HQ-18 (S-300V) (China) – Jane's Strategic Weapon Systems" (http://articles.janes.com/arti
cles/Janes-Strategic-Weapon-Systems/HQ-18-S-300V-China.html). Articles.janes.com. 16
December 2011. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20120402185021/http://articles.jane
s.com/articles/Janes-Strategic-Weapon-Systems/HQ-18-S-300V-China.html) from the
original on 2 April 2012. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
22. "Hongqi-15 (HQ-15)" (https://web.archive.org/web/20120505035238/http://www.missilethrea
t.com/missiledefensesystems/id.29/system_detail.asp). MissileThreat. Archived from the
original (http://www.missilethreat.com/missiledefensesystems/id.29/system_detail.asp) on 5
May 2012. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
23. "4. Anti-Stealth and Countermeasures" (https://web.archive.org/web/20120518132501/http://
sinodefence.com/special/airdefence/fortress-china4.asp). SinoDefence.com. Archived from
the original (http://www.sinodefence.com/special/airdefence/fortress-china4.asp) on 18 May
2012. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
24. "China Adds Precision Strike To Capabilities" (http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story
_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/CHINA040809.xml&headline=China%20adds%20
precision%20strike%20to%20capabilities). Aviationweek.com. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
25. "Demarche Following China's January 2010 Intercept Flight-Test" (https://www.telegraph.co.
uk/news/wikileaks-files/china-wikileaks/8299323/DEMARCHE-FOLLOWING-CHINAS-JANU
ARY-2010-INTERCEPT-FLIGHT-TEST.html). The Daily Telegraph. London. 2 February
2011. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20180203065924/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/n
ews/wikileaks-files/china-wikileaks/8299323/DEMARCHE-FOLLOWING-CHINAS-JANUARY
-2010-INTERCEPT-FLIGHT-TEST.html) from the original on 3 February 2018. Retrieved
4 April 2018.
26. 我国试验陆基反导 此前仅美国进行过相关试验 (http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2010-01-12/0247
580308.html) (in Chinese). SINA News. 12 January 2010. Archived (https://web.archive.org/
web/20100114072145/http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2010-01-12/0247580308.html) from the
original on 14 January 2010. Retrieved 11 January 2010.
27. "NTI" (http://www.globalsecuritynewswire.org/gsn/nw_20100114_5918.php). Global Security
Newswire. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20100119032640/http://www.globalsecurit
ynewswire.org/gsn/nw_20100114_5918.php) from the original on 19 January 2010.
Retrieved 11 May 2012.
28. "China test-fires anti-ballistic missile" (https://web.archive.org/web/20130516201119/http://e
nglish.ruvr.ru/2013_01_28/China-test-fires-defensive-missile/). english.ruvr.ru. Archived from
the original (http://english.ruvr.ru/2013_01_28/China-test-fires-defensive-missile/) on 16 May
2013. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
29. Tate, Andrew (8 February 2021). "China conducts another mid-course anti-ballistic missile
test" (https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/china-conducts-another-mid-course-
anti-ballistic-missile-test). Janes.
30. Trevithick, Joseph (4 February 2021). "China Claims It Has Conducted A New Midcourse
Intercept Anti-Ballistic Missile Test" (https://web.archive.org/web/20210513164726/https://w
ww.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39093/china-claims-it-has-conducted-a-new-midcourse-inter
cept-anti-ballistic-missile-test). The Drive. Archived from the original (https://www.thedrive.co
m/the-war-zone/39093/china-claims-it-has-conducted-a-new-midcourse-intercept-anti-ballisti
c-missile-test) on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 13 May 2021.
31. "SAMP/T Successful on First European Missile Defense Intercept Test" (https://web.archive.
org/web/20101129040354/http://defense-update.com/wp/20101126_samp_t.html). Defense
Update. 26 November 2010. Archived from the original (http://defense-update.com/wp/2010
1126_samp_t.html) on 29 November 2010. Retrieved 26 November 2010.
32. "Premier tir anti-balistique | Blog de la DE" (https://web.archive.org/web/20120426071256/ht
tp://ead-minerve.fr/WordPress3/?p=683). Ead-minerve.fr. Archived from the original (http://e
ad-minerve.fr/WordPress3/?p=683) on 26 April 2012. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
33. "Une première en France : un missile intercepté par un antimissile Aster" (https://archive.tod
ay/20120905155335/http://www.marianne2.fr/blogsecretdefense/m/Une-premiere-en-France
-un-missile-intercepte-par-un-antimissile-Aster_a442.html?com) (in French). Marianne2.fr.
Archived from the original (http://www.marianne2.fr/blogsecretdefense/m/Une-premiere-en-F
rance-un-missile-intercepte-par-un-antimissile-Aster_a442.html?com) on 5 September
2012. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
34. Tran, Pierre (14 June 2016). "France, Italy To Cooperate in Development of Aster Missile" (h
ttps://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/eurosatory/2016/06/14/france-italy-to-coop
erate-in-development-of-aster-missile/). DefenseNews. Retrieved 18 June 2021.
35. "MBDA debuts European hypersonic interceptor concept Aquila" (https://breakingdefense.co
m/2023/06/mbda-debuts-european-hypersonic-interceptor-concept-aquila/). 20 June 2023.
36. "Aquila: MBDA to lead consortium for European interceptor against hypersonic threats" (http
s://newsroom.mbda-systems.com/aquila-mbda-to-lead-consortium-for-european-interceptor-
against-hypersonic-threats/). 20 June 2023.
37. "Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO)'s projects - Overview" (https://www.consilium.
europa.eu/media/41333/pesco-projects-12-nov-2019.pdf) (PDF). 12 November 2019.
38. "Spanish, German companies start work on hypersonic missile interceptor" (https://www.def
ensenews.com/global/europe/2022/09/05/spanish-german-companies-start-work-on-hypers
onic-missile-interceptor/). 5 September 2022.
39. "Timely Warning and Interception With Space-Based Theater Surveillance (TWISTER)" (http
s://www.pesco.europa.eu/project/timely-warning-and-interception-with-space-based-theater-
surveillance-twister/). 12 November 2019.
40. "Interview: Vijay Kumar Saraswat Chief Controller of Research and Development, India's
DRDO" (http://www.defensenews.com/aero/story.php?id=2524130).
41. Prithvi Mission Milestone in Missile Defence (http://mod.nic.in/samachar/dec15-06/h1.htm)
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20071208161324/http://mod.nic.in/samachar/dec15-0
6/h1.htm) 8 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine.
42. "India successfully conducts interceptor supersonic missile test" (http://pib.nic.in/release/rele
ase.asp?relid=33815). Pib.nic.in. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20151015200451/ht
tp://pib.nic.in/release/release.asp?relid=33815) from the original on 15 October 2015.
Retrieved 11 May 2012.
43. "DRDO to launch series of missiles" (https://web.archive.org/web/20121108160559/http://w
ww.hindu.com/2009/10/17/stories/2009101755791100.htm). The Hindu. 17 October 2009.
Archived from the original (http://www.hindu.com/2009/10/17/stories/2009101755791100.ht
m) on 8 November 2012. Retrieved 6 December 2012.
44. "India Successfully Test-Fires New Interceptor Missile" (https://web.archive.org/web/201404
28163936/http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=838755). News.outlookindia.com.
Archived from the original (http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=838755) on 28
April 2014. Retrieved 30 April 2014.
45. Rajat Pandit (26 November 2007). "India on way to joining exclusive BMD club" (http://times
ofindia.indiatimes.com/India_on_way_to_joining_exclusive_BMD_club/rssarticleshow/25706
83.cms). The Times of India. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20130513163850/http://t
imesofindia.indiatimes.com/India_on_way_to_joining_exclusive_BMD_club/rssarticleshow/2
570683.cms) from the original on 13 May 2013. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
46. Franz-Stefan, Gady. "India Successfully Tests Supersonic Interceptor Missile" (https://thedipl
omat.com/2016/05/india-successfully-tests-supersonic-interceptor-missile/). Archived (http
s://web.archive.org/web/20170814205906/https://thediplomat.com/2016/05/india-successfull
y-tests-supersonic-interceptor-missile/) from the original on 14 August 2017. Retrieved
21 July 2017.
47. Philip, Snehesh Alex (8 January 2020). "India's ballistic missile shield ready, IAF & DRDO to
seek govt nod to protect Delhi" (https://theprint.in/defence/indias-ballistic-missile-shield-read
y-iaf-drdo-to-seek-govt-nod-to-protect-delhi/345853/). ThePrint. Retrieved 11 February
2020.
48. "Rajat Pandit (9 June 2019) India to buy US missile system to shield Delhi" (https://timesofin
dia.indiatimes.com/india/india-to-acquire-us-air-defence-system-for-multi-tier-missile-shield-
over-delhi/articleshow/69717946.cms). The Times of India. 10 June 2019.
49. Gady, Franz-Stefan (8 January 2020). "Report: India's Homemade Anti-Ballistic Missile
Shield Ready" (https://thediplomat.com/2020/01/report-indias-homemade-anti-ballistic-missil
e-shield-ready/). thediplomat.com. Retrieved 4 November 2022.
50. Pandit, Rajat (10 June 2019). "NASAMS 2: India to buy US missile system to shield Delhi"
(https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/india-to-acquire-us-air-defence-system-for-multi-tie
r-missile-shield-over-delhi/articleshow/69717946.cms). The Times of India. Retrieved
11 February 2020.
51. Lakshman, Sriram (11 February 2020). "U.S. State dept. nod for sale of air defence system
to India" (https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/us-approves-sale-of-integrated-air-de
fence-weapon-system-to-india/article30787461.ece). The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X (https://s
earch.worldcat.org/issn/0971-751X). Retrieved 11 February 2020.
52. "India concerned over 'very high price' of American missile shield for Delhi" (https://www.live
mint.com/news/india/india-concerned-over-very-high-price-of-american-missile-shield-for-del
hi-11581863130642.html). mint. 16 February 2020. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
53. "Not Keen On NASAMS-II, IAF Wants Indian Missile Defence" (https://www.livefistdefence.c
om/not-keen-on-nasams-ii-iaf-wants-indian-missile-defence/). Livefist Defence. 20 July
2022. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
54. "India's AD-1 missile can intercept, destroy enemy ballistic missiles fired from 5000 km
away" (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/indias-ad-1-missile-can-intercept-destroy-en
emy-ballistic-missiles-fired-from-5000-km-away/articleshow/95279202.cms). The Times of
India. 3 November 2022. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
55. "Iran unveils new air defense weaponry as regional tensions ramp up, IRNA reports" (https://
www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-unveils-new-air-defense-weaponry-regional-tension
s-ramp-up-irna-2024-02-17/). Reuters. 17 February 2024. Retrieved 16 November 2024.
56. "Russia Risks Reputation Of Its Weapons Systems With Iran Air Defense Delivery" (https://w
ww.forbes.com/sites/pauliddon/2024/08/07/russia-risks-reputation-of-its-weapons-systems-
with-iran-air-defense-delivery/). Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20240924165401/http
s://www.forbes.com/sites/pauliddon/2024/08/07/russia-risks-reputation-of-its-weapons-syste
ms-with-iran-air-defense-delivery/) from the original on 24 September 2024. Retrieved
16 November 2024.
57. "Israeli-United States Relations" (https://web.archive.org/web/20021104204721/http://www.p
olicyalmanac.org/world/archive/crs_israeli-us_relations.shtml). Policy almanac. Archived
from the original (http://www.policyalmanac.org/world/archive/crs_israeli-us_relations.shtml)
on 4 November 2002. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
58. "Israeli missile test 'successful' " (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6352659.st
m). News. BBC. 11 February 2007. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20071216001604/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6352659.stm) from the original on 16
December 2007. Retrieved 25 April 2010.
59. Opall-Rome, Barbara (10 December 2015). "US-Israel Arrow-3 intercepts target in space" (h
ttp://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/air-space/strike/2015/12/10/us-israel-arrow-3-inte
rcepts-target-space/77087084/). Defense News. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
60. "U.S. and Allied Ballistic Missile Defenses in the Asia-Pacific Region | Arms Control
Association" (https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/us-allied-ballistic-missile-defenses-asia
-pacific-region#Japan). www.armscontrol.org. Retrieved 26 April 2022.
61. "Japan plans Tokyo missile shield" (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7188698.st
m). BBC News. 15 January 2008. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20080118152525/h
ttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7188698.stm) from the original on 18 January
2008. Retrieved 17 January 2008.
62. John Pike. "GlobalSystems: ABM-1" (http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/abm1.
htm). Globalsecurity.org. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20120516040109/http://ww
w.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/abm1.htm) from the original on 16 May 2012.
Retrieved 11 May 2012.
63. "Russian Anti-Ballistic Guided Missile Systems" (https://web.archive.org/web/200802091616
38/http://www.wonderland.org.nz/rusabgm.htm#ABM-1). Archived from the original (http://w
ww.wonderland.org.nz/rusabgm.htm#ABM-1) on 9 February 2008.
64. John Pike (20 April 2018). "Galosh - Moscow System" (https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/
world/russia/galosh.htm). Globalsecurity.org. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/2018100
9013325/https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/galosh.htm) from the original on 9
October 2018. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
65. Sean O'Connor (27 January 2014). "Russian/Soviet Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems" (http://au
sairpower.net/APA-Rus-ABM-Systems.html). p. 1. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/201
51121053912/http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Rus-ABM-Systems.html) from the original on
21 November 2015. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
66. "Wonderland.org: ABM-3" (https://web.archive.org/web/20080209161638/http://www.wonder
land.org.nz/rusabgm.htm). Archived from the original (http://www.wonderland.org.nz/rusabg
m.htm#ABM-3) on 9 February 2008.
67. "Russian Anti-Ballistic Guided Missile Systems" (https://web.archive.org/web/200812202323
05/http://www.wonderland.org.nz/rusabgm.htm). 20 December 2008. Archived from the
original on 20 December 2008. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
68. John Pike (20 April 2018). "51T6 Gorgon" (https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/
gorgon.htm). Globalsecurity.org. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20181009013309/htt
ps://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/gorgon.htm) from the original on 9 October
2018. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
69. "Jason Cutshaw (August 8, 2019) Leader gives space and missile defense update at SMD
Symposium" (https://www.army.mil/article/225470/leader_gives_space_and_missile_defens
e_update_at_smd_symposium).
70. John Pike. "Operation Iraqi Freedom – Patriot" (http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/ops/oif-
patriot.htm). GlobalSecurity.org. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20120220031217/htt
p://www.globalsecurity.org/space/ops/oif-patriot.htm) from the original on 20 February 2012.
Retrieved 11 May 2012.
71. "BBC NEWS – World – Americas – US missile hits 'toxic satellite' " (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/
hi/world/americas/7254540.stm). news.bbc.co.uk. 21 February 2008. Archived (https://web.a
rchive.org/web/20090413122801/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7254540.stm)
from the original on 13 April 2009. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
72. MDA Newsroom (17 Nov 2020) U.S. Successfully Conducts SM-3 Block IIA Intercept Test
Against an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Target (https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Rele
ases/Release/Article/2417334/us-successfully-conducts-sm-3-block-iia-intercept-test-agains
t-an-intercontinen/) SM-3 Block IIA Intercept Test animation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUDQrLcY5oI Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/202
10425000520/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUDQrLcY5oI) 25 April 2021 at the
Wayback Machine
73. Panda, Ankit. "What Is THAAD, What Does It Do, and Why Is China Mad About It?" (https://t
hediplomat.com/2016/02/what-is-thaad-what-does-it-do-and-why-is-china-mad-about-it/).
The Diplomat. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20170404130539/https://thediplomat.c
om/2016/02/what-is-thaad-what-does-it-do-and-why-is-china-mad-about-it/) from the original
on 4 April 2017. Retrieved 3 April 2017.
74. McCarthy, Niall. "Can The U.S. Intercept A North Korean Missile? [Infographic]" (https://ww
w.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/09/05/can-the-u-s-intercept-a-north-korean-missile-inf
ographic/). Forbes. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
75. "Army Seeks To Field One-Size-Fits-All Battle Command System" (http://spacenews.com/ar
my-seeks-field-one-size-fits-all-battle-command-system/). Space News. 29 June 2004.
76. Kiley, Gregory T. (17 May 2017). "Congress and the Administration Must Reassess Failing
Missile Defense Programs" (http://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2017/05/17/failing_mis
sile_defense_programs_111398.html). RealClearDefense. Archived (https://web.archive.or
g/web/20170521151129/http://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2017/05/17/failing_missile
_defense_programs_111398.html) from the original on 21 May 2017. Retrieved 22 June
2017.
77. "Fort Sill Tribune staff (August 8, 2019) MOS 14E: Linchpin of Patriot missile system" (http
s://www.army.mil/article/225475/mos_14e_linchpin_of_patriot_missile_system).
78. "Jen Judson (11 Oct 2018) So Patriot and THAAD will talk. What does that really mean?" (ht
tps://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/ausa/2018/10/10/so-patriot-and-thaad-will-t
alk-what-does-that-really-mean/). 10 October 2018.
79. "Jen Judson (20 Aug 2020) US Army's future missile defense command system nearly
simultaneously defeats cruise, ballistic missile threats" (https://www.defensenews.com/digita
l-show-dailies/smd/2020/08/20/armys-future-missile-defense-battle-command-system-caps-
off-major-test-with-defeat-of-cruise-ballistic-missile-threats/). 20 August 2020.
80. Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System (IBCS) (http://www.northropgru
mman.com/Capabilities/IBCS/Pages/default.aspx)Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/201
71006163751/http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/IBCS/Pages/default.aspx) 6
October 2017 at the Wayback Machine vendor summary
81. "Daniel Cebul (12 October 2018) Army continues push for integrated sensors and shooters
with latest IBCS contract" (https://www.defensenews.com/land/2018/10/02/army-continues-p
ush-for-integrated-sensors-and-shooters-with-latest-ibcs-contract/). 2 October 2018.
82. Daniel Cebul (9 October 2018) Army looks to a future of integrated fire (https://www.defen
senews.com/digital-show-dailies/ausa/2018/10/08/army-looks-to-a-future-of-integrated-fire/)
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20221126000941/https://www.defensenews.com/digit
al-show-dailies/ausa/2018/10/08/army-looks-to-a-future-of-integrated-fire/) 26 November
2022 at the Wayback Machine by integrating THAAD IBCS LRPF
83. Andrew Eversden (23 Dec 2021) Army awards Northrop Grumman $1.4 billion contract for
IBCS (https://breakingdefense.com/2021/12/army-awards-northrop-grumman-1-4-billion-con
tract-for-ibcs/) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20211224073613/https://breakingdefen
se.com/2021/12/army-awards-northrop-grumman-1-4-billion-contract-for-ibcs/) 24
December 2021 at the Wayback Machine
84. "Jen Judson (February 6, 2017) Army falls behind with new anti-missile command system"
(https://www.defensenews.com/land/2017/02/06/army-falls-behind-with-new-anti-missile-co
mmand-system/). 6 February 2017.
85. Jen Judson (10 Mar 2022) Missile Defense Agency fires Patriot missile from THAAD system
(https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2022/03/10/missile-defense-agency-fires-patriot-m
issile-from-thaad-system/) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20221126000939/https://w
ww.defensenews.com/pentagon/2022/03/10/missile-defense-agency-fires-patriot-missile-fro
m-thaad-system/) 26 November 2022 at the Wayback Machine
86. Huang, Po-Chang (9 May 2017). "Who to Protect? Taiwan's SAM Systems and the
Distribution of Protection" (https://sites.tufts.edu/gis/files/2017/06/Huang_Po-Chang_DHP_2
07_Spring_2017.pdf) (PDF). TUFTS University. Archived (https://ghostarchive.org/archive/2
0221009/https://sites.tufts.edu/gis/files/2017/06/Huang_Po-Chang_DHP_207_Spring_2017.
pdf) (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 7 April 2022.
87. Park, Hwee Rhak (2018). "The Ballistic Missile Defense Construction Strategies of South
Korea and Japan: Self-reliance versus Cooperation with the US" (https://www.jstor.org/stabl
e/26909945). Journal of International and Area Studies. 25 (2): 87–106. ISSN 1226-8550 (ht
tps://search.worldcat.org/issn/1226-8550). JSTOR 26909945 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/26
909945).
88. "South Korea tests indigenous long-range surface-to-air missile" (https://www.janes.com/def
ence-news/news-detail/south-korea-tests-indigenous-long-range-surface-to-air-missile).
Janes.com. Retrieved 26 April 2022.
89. Gregory Canavan, "Missile Defense for the 21st Century" (http://missilethreat.wpengine.netd
na-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/20030000-Heritage-canavan.pdf) Archived (https://
web.archive.org/web/20150713192027/http://missilethreat.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-co
ntent/uploads/2012/11/20030000-Heritage-canavan.pdf) 13 July 2015 at the Wayback
Machine, Heritage Foundation, 2003, p.3
90. Ramsey, Syed (12 May 2016). Tools of War: History of Weapons in Modern Times (https://b
ooks.google.com/books?id=aUk5DAAAQBAJ&q=By+the+mid-1950s,+things+had+changed
+considerably,+and+many+forces+worldwide+were+considering+ABM+systems.&pg=PT2
8). Vij Books India Pvt Ltd. ISBN 9789386019837.
91. Nuclear Weapon Archive.org. Argus (http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/Argus.html)
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20060911023819/http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Us
a/Tests/Argus.html) 11 September 2006 at the Wayback Machine.
92. Gobarev, Victor (2001). "The early development of Russia's ballistic missile defense
system". The Journal of Slavic Military Studies. 14 (2): 29–48.
doi:10.1080/13518040108430478 (https://doi.org/10.1080%2F13518040108430478).
S2CID 144681318 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:144681318). Viewed 26 May
2012.
93. Karpenko, A (1999). "ABM AND SPACE DEFENSE" (https://fas.org/spp/starwars/program/s
oviet/990600-bmd-rus.htm). Nevsky Bastion. 4: 2–47. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/
20160303165344/http://fas.org/spp/starwars/program/soviet/990600-bmd-rus.htm) from the
original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 18 October 2015.
 94. Krebs, Gunter Dirk. "1Ya2TA" (https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_lau/1ya2ta.htm). Gunter's
Space Page. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
95. GlobalSecurity.org. -135 anti-ballistic missile system (http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/worl
d/russia/abm3.htm) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20071015034259/http://www.glob
alsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/abm3.htm) 15 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine.
96. Wragg, David W. (1973). A Dictionary of Aviation (first ed.). Osprey. p. 200.
ISBN 9780850451634.
97. "Military Magic Boosts Astronomy : Declassified technology enhances celestial knowledge"
(https://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?vid=6&sid=d2b37e4a-4a62-4a05-8cc7-7521f
023995e%40sessionmgr101&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#AN=edsgcl.7502930
1&db=edsgbc). Astronomy. 29 (1): 48. January 2001. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
98. "Patriot system performance – report summary" (https://web.archive.org/web/200602261118
36/http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2005-01-Patriot_Report_Summary.pdf) (PDF).
Defense Science Board Task Force. January 2005. Archived from the original (http://www.ac
q.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2005-01-Patriot_Report_Summary.pdf) (PDF) on 26 February 2006.
99. "Hawk" (https://web.archive.org/web/20151015200451/http://fas.org/spp/starwars/program/h
awk.htm). FAS. Archived from the original (https://fas.org/spp/starwars/program/hawk.htm)
on 15 October 2015.
100. "Navy Area Defense (NAD)" (https://web.archive.org/web/20070812145613/https://fas.org/s
pp/starwars/program/sm2.htm). FAS. Archived from the original (https://fas.org/spp/starwars/
program/sm2.htm) on 12 August 2007.
101. "DoD Succeeds in Intercepting Non-Functioning Satellite" (http://www.defenselink.mil/releas
es/release.aspx?releaseid=11704) (Press release). U.S. Department of Defense. 20
February 2008. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20080226105236/http://www.defensel
ink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=11704) from the original on 26 February 2008.
Retrieved 20 February 2008.
102. "Navy Succeeds in Intercepting Non-Functioning Satellite" (http://www.navy.mil/search/displ
ay.asp?story_id=35114) (Press release). U.S. Navy. 20 February 2008. Archived (https://we
b.archive.org/web/20080225234718/http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=3511
4) from the original on 25 February 2008. Retrieved 20 February 2008.
103. "Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD)" (https://web.archive.org/web/20101206200507/
http://www.mda.mil/system/gmd.html). MDA. Archived from the original (http://www.mda.mil/
system/gmd.html) on 6 December 2010. Retrieved 8 February 2011. "A total of 30
interceptors are planned for deployment by the end of 2010. "
104. PBS. The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer. A Viable Defense? (https://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/
military/jan-june99/nmd_1-28a.html) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/2011012713241
3/http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/military/jan-june99/nmd_1-28a.html) 27 January 2011 at
the Wayback Machine. 28 January 1999.
105. Hildreth, Steven A.; Ek, Carl (28 December 2010). "Missile Defense and NATO's Lisbon
Summit" (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc491310/). UNT Digital Library.
Retrieved 11 May 2022.
106. U.S. Army announces successful test of U.S. Army Zombie Pathfinder rocket (https://www.ar
my.mil/article/179788/us_army_announces_successful_test_of_us_army_zombie_pathfinde
r_rocket) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20170109113728/https://www.army.mil/articl
e/179788/us_army_announces_successful_test_of_us_army_zombie_pathfinder_rocket) 9
January 2017 at the Wayback Machine accessdate=2017-01-08
107. Richard F. Pittenger and Robert B. Gagosian (Dec 2003) Global Warming Could Have a
Chilling Effect on the Military (http://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/weather/climat
echange/ADA422382.pdf) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20210506004712/https://d
ocuments.theblackvault.com/documents/weather/climatechange/ADA422382.pdf) 6 May
2021 at the Wayback Machine "Military planners should begin to consider potential abrupt
climate change scenarios and their impacts on national defense."
David Vergun (22 April 2021) Defense Secretary Calls Climate Change an Existential
Threat (https://www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/2582051/defense-secretar
y-calls-climate-change-an-existential-threat/) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/2021
0427140653/https://www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/2582051/defense-sec
retary-calls-climate-change-an-existential-threat/) 27 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine
Chris D’Angelo and Alexander C. Kaufman (01/18/2019) Pentagon Confirms Climate
Change Is A National Security Threat, Contradicting Trump (https://www.huffpost.com/en
try/defense-department-climate-change-national-security-threat_n_5c420386e4b027c3b
bc1713f) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20210427135218/https://www.huffpost.c
om/entry/defense-department-climate-change-national-security-threat_n_5c420386e4b0
27c3bbc1713f) 27 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine 79 Military installations; " 'Air
Force's $1 billion radar installation on a Marshall Islands atoll 'is projected to be
underwater within two decades'."
Scott Waldman, E&E News (1 March 2018) Key Missile Defense Installation Will be
Uninhabitable in Less Than 20 Years (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/key-mis
sile-defense-installation-will-be-uninhabitable-in-less-than-20-years/) Archived (https://w
eb.archive.org/web/20210427134105/https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/key-mis
sile-defense-installation-will-be-uninhabitable-in-less-than-20-years/) 27 April 2021 at the
Wayback Machine:Rising seas will ruin Kwajalein Atoll site where 1,300 work and live
108. "Jason Cutshaw (24 February 2021) Army's Reagan Test Site supports missile test" (https://
www.army.mil/article/243648/armys_reagan_test_site_supports_missile_test).
109. Bowman, Bradley (23 November 2020). "Successful SM-3 weapons test offers missile
defense opportunity" (https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2020/11/21/succe
ssful-sm-3-weapons-test-offers-missile-defense-opportunity/). defensenews.com. Retrieved
25 November 2020.

General sources
Murdock, Clark A. (1974), Defense Policy Formation: A Comparative Analysis of the
McNamara Era. SUNY Press.

Further reading
Laura Grego and David Wright, "Broken Shield: Missiles designed to destroy incoming
nuclear warheads fail frequently in tests and could increase global risk of mass destruction",
Scientific American, vol. 320, no. no. 6 (June 2019), pp. 62–67. "Current U.S. missile
defense plans are being driven largely by technology, politics and fear. Missile defenses will
not allow us to escape our vulnerability to nuclear weapons. Instead large-scale
 developments will create barriers to taking real steps toward reducing nuclear risks—by
blocking further cuts in nuclear arsenals and potentially spurring new deployments." (p. 67.)

External links
Article on Missile Threat Shift to the Black Sea region (https://web.archive.org/web/2014020
1183352/http://www.thediplomat.ro/articol.php?id=554)
Video of the Endo-Atmospheric Interceptor missile system test by India (http://video.google.
com/videoplay?docid=2723153636466253240) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20110
716140208/http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2723153636466253240) 16 July 2011
at the Wayback Machine
Video of the Exo-Atmospheric interceptor missile system test by India (https://web.archive.or
g/web/20061219195340/http://www.ibnlive.com/videos/27568/india-unveils-missile-intercept
ors.html)
Center for Defense Information (http://www.cdi.org)
Federation of American Scientists (https://fas.org/ssp/bmd/index.html)
MissileThreat.com (https://web.archive.org/web/20120720083017/http://missilethreat.com/sy
stems/)
Stanley R. Mickelson Safeguard complex (http://www.srmsc.org/)
History of U.S. Air Defense Systems (https://web.archive.org/web/20051229203013/http://w
ww.redstone.army.mil/history/vigilant/intro.html)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-ballistic_missile&oldid=1260990547"