Annual Report 7 October 2022
Annual Report 7 October 2022
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
J D Wetherspoon plc
ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2022
with good-quality 14
15
Statement of changes in equity
Notes to the financial statements
food and drinks,
served by well-trained SECTION 2
and friendly staff, at 43 Accounting policies
Financial calendar
Year end
30 July 2023
The company was founded in 1979 – and this is the 39th year since incorporation in 1983.
The table below outlines some key aspects of our performance during that period.
Background
Two equity issues during the pandemic were, of
To coin a Shakespeare phrase, “the multiplying course, key factors in this strengthening of the
villainies of nature do swarm upon” the hospitality balance sheet.
industry, following the lockdowns and restrictions of
the pandemic - and surprisingly perhaps, the On an IFRS 16 basis, which includes notional debt
aftermath has been just as difficult for many from leases, debt decreased from £1.45 billion to
companies. £1.29 billion between January 2020 and the end of
FY22.
Most commentators, including most publicans,
understandably predicted a post-lockdown boom, in In this context, Wetherspoon has, as reported
which the public would react to enforced cabin fever below, fixed £770 million of its debt until November
by embarking on a celebratory spree, but the reality 2031, at an average of 1.24%, excluding the banks’
has, in contrast, been a painstakingly slow recovery margin, a significant benefit at a time of rising
in sales, for some but not all, accompanied by great interest rates.
inflation in costs.
Fortunately, the company was able to extend these
A possible reason for the much slower-than- swaps by 32 months in the first half of FY22 - before
anticipated recovery has been an underestimation sharply rising inflation and interest rates were
of the power of habit in determining human anticipated by the market.
behaviour.
The mark-to-market value of these swaps was
During lockdown, dyed-in-the-wool pub-goers, many £182.7 million, as of 2 October 2022.
for the first time, filled their fridges with supermarket
Trading Summary
beer - and it has proved to be a momentous
challenge to persuade them to return to the more In the summary below we have compared sales and
salubrious environment of the saloon bar. profits with FY19, but cash flow, debt and other
areas are compared with FY21. To try to avoid
Even so, Wetherspoon’s trading performance in
confusion, we also provide a table, below, showing
FY22 improved versus the annus horribilis of FY21,
some key indicators referred to in this section of the
but was still markedly adverse to pre-pandemic
annual report, for the last four financial years.
FY19.
Total sales for FY22 were £1,740.5 million, a
Although like-for-like sales decreased by 4.7%
decrease of 4.3%, compared to the pre-pandemic
compared to FY19, sales trends improved in the
52 weeks ended 28 July 2019.
financial year. In the first half, like-for-like sales were
-7.4%; in the third quarter they were -4.0% and in Like-for-like sales, as indicated above, compared to
the fourth quarter they were -0.6%. FY19, decreased by 4.7%. Like-for-like bar sales
decreased by 6.5% and food sales by 3.2%.
Like-for-like sales have improved in the first 9 weeks
Slot/fruit machine sales increased by 12.3% and
of the current financial year (FY23) and are 10.1%
hotel room sales increased by 6.5%.
ahead of the first 9 weeks of FY22.
The operating profit, before exceptional items, was
In addition to the slowly improving sales trend, there
£25.7 million (2019: £131.9 million). The operating
was a significant turnaround of £105 million in free
margin, before exceptional items, was 1.5% (2019:
cashflow, which improved to an inflow of £21.9
7.3%).
million in FY22 compared to an outflow of £83.3
million in FY21. The loss before tax and exceptional items was
£30.4 million (2019: £102.5 million profit). This
Perhaps surprisingly, the Wetherspoon balance
included property gains of £2.1 million (2019: £5.6
sheet is also stronger than before the pandemic, at
million).
the expense of some dilution to pre-pandemic
shareholders. The company sold, closed, or terminated the leases
of 15 pubs, giving rise to a cash inflow of £5.9
Debt levels, combined with trade creditors
million.
(excluding notional IFRS 16 lease debt), have
increased by £53 million since January 2020, just Losses per share, including shares held in trust by
before the first lockdown, substantially less than a the employee share scheme, before exceptional
total of £158.3 million invested in freehold items, were 19.6p (2019: earnings per share of
“reversions” and new pubs during the period. 75.5p).
£42.8 million in existing pubs and IT (2021: £20.0 £12.8 million for share purchases for employees
million) and £25.8 million in freehold reversions of (2021: £7.7 million) and payments of tax and
properties where Wetherspoon was the tenant interest. Free cash inflow per share was 17.3p
(2021: £16.9 million). (2021: 67.8p outflow).
Exceptional items
Swap Weighted
Start Date End Date
There was a pre-tax exceptional gain of £56.7 Value Average %
million (2021: £27.5 million loss).
£770m 30-Jul-21 30-Jul-23 1.61%
£52.9 million of the gain related to the fair value
movement of interest rate swaps, which the £770m 31-Jul-23 30-Jul-26 1.10%
company has in place for approximately the next 9
£770m 31-Jul-26 30-Jun-28 1.33%
years, as reported above, at an average rate of
1.24%, excluding the banks’ margin. In addition, £770m 01-Jul-28 29-Mar-29 1.32%
there was a gain of £27.8 million in relation to an
£770m 31-Mar-29 30-Nov-31 1.02%
HMRC claim, regarding the historic VAT treatment
of slot/fruit machines. There was also a gain of £1.4
million in respect of government support grants, Property
associated with the pandemic. Finally, there was a The company opened seven pubs during the year
£24.4 million property impairment charge, in respect and sold, closed or terminated the leases of 15
of pubs which were deemed unlikely to generate pubs. The company had a trading estate of 852
sufficient cash flows, in the future, to support their pubs at the financial year end.
carrying value.
The company is currently marketing 32 pubs, most
Free Cash Flow of which are within a close radius of other pubs we
own. The strategy of opening larger pubs, at a
There was a free cash inflow of £21.9 million (2021:
considerable distance from each other, reflects a
£83.3 million outflow), after capital payments of
long-term strategy, rather than a reaction to trading
£45.9 million for existing pubs (2021: £22.3 million),
difficulties in the Covid era, as some commentators
have incorrectly said.
clear that the duty has been paid. Unit 6 (vacant) £141,750 3,956 £35.83
The Centre, Livingston important there – people can less afford to pay the
Rates per difference in prices between the on and off trade.
Rateable Customer
Occupier Name square
Value (RV) Area (ft²)
foot As a result, in these less affluent areas, there are
The Newyearfield
(JDW)
£165,750 4,090 £40.53 often fewer pubs, coffee shops and restaurants, with
Paraffin Lamp £52,200 2,077 £25.13
less employment and increased high-street
derelication. Tax equality would also be in line with
Wagamana £67,600 2,096 £32.25
the principle of fairness – the same taxes should
Nando’s £80,700 2,196 £36.75 apply to businesses which sell the same products.
Chiquito £68,500 2,221 £30.84
VAT equality
How pubs contribute to the economy In the financial year ended 31 July 2022, the
company generated taxes of £662.7 million.
Wetherspoon and other pub and restaurant
companies have always generated far more in taxes The table below shows the £5.8 billion of tax
than are earned in profits. Wetherspoon, it’s revenue generated by the company, its staff and
customers and staff, generated total taxes in FY19, customers in the last 10 years. Each pub, on
before the pandemic, of £763.6 million. This average, generated £6.5 million in tax during that
equated to one pound in every thousand of UK period. The tax generated by the company, during
government revenue. this 10-year period, equates to approximately 20
times the company’s profits after tax.
TOTAL
2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2013 to
2022
£m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
VAT 287.7 93.8 244.3 357.9 332.8 323.4 311.7 294.4 275.1 253.0 2,774.1
Alcohol duty 156.6 70.6 124.2 174.4 175.9 167.2 164.4 161.4 157.0 144.4 1,496.1
PAYE and NIC 141.9 101.5 106.6 121.4 109.2 96.2 95.1 84.8 78.4 70.2 1,005.3
Business rates 50.3 1.5 39.5 57.3 55.6 53.0 50.2 48.7 44.9 46.4 447.4
Corporation tax 1.5 - 21.5 19.9 26.1 20.7 19.9 15.3 18.4 18.4 161.7
Corporation tax
credit (historic
- - - - - - - -2.0 - - -2.0
capital
allowances)
Fruit/slot
12.8 4.3 9.0 11.6 10.5 10.5 11 11.2 11.3 7.2 99.4
Machine duty
Climate change
9.7 7.9 10.0 9.6 9.2 9.7 8.7 6.4 6.3 4.3 81.8
levies
Stamp duty 2.7 1.8 4.9 3.7 1.2 5.1 2.6 1.8 2.1 1.0 26.9
Fuel duty 1.9 1.1 1.7 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.9 2.1 2.0 20.2
Carbon tax - - - 1.9 3.0 3.4 3.6 3.7 2.7 2.6 20.9
Premise licence
0.5 0.5 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.6 0.7 0.7 8.2
and TV licences
Employee
-4.4 -213.0 -124.1 - - - - - - - -341.5
support grants
Local
Government -1.4 -11.1 - - - - - - - - -12.5
Grants
TOTAL TAX 662.7 37.0 440.7 763.6 728.8 694.6 672.3 632.4 600.5 551.5 5,784.1
TAX PER PUB 0.78 0.04 0.53 0.87 0.83 0.77 0.71 0.67 0.66 0.63 6.49
TAX AS % OF
38.1% 4.8% 34.9% 42.0% 43.0% 41.8% 42.1% 41.8% 42.6% 43.1% 37.4%
NET SALES
LOSS/PROFIT
-24.9 -146.5 -38.5 79.6 83.6 76.9 56.9 57.5 58.9 65.2 268.7
AFTER TAX
Note – this table is prepared on a cash basis.
IFRS 16 was implemented in the year ending 26 July 2020 (FY20). From this period all profit numbers in the above table are on
a Post-IFRS 16 basis. Prior to this date all profit numbers are on a Pre-IFRS 16 basis.
Corporate Governance
As a result, it appears that compliance officers and
Wetherspoon has been a strong critic of the governance advisors, in practice, often rely on a
composition of the boards of UK-quoted companies. “tick-box” approach, which is, itself, in breach of the
Code.
As a result of the “nine-year rule”, limiting the tenure
of NEDs and the presumption in favour of A further issue is that many major investors, in their
“independent”, part-time chairmen, boards are often own companies, for sensible reasons, do not
composed of short-term directors, with very little observe the nine-year rule, and other rules,
representation from those who understand the themselves. An approach of “do what I say, not
company best - people who work for it full-time, or what I do” is clearly unsustainable.
have worked for it full-time.
Further progress
Wetherspoon’s review of the boards of major banks
As always, the company has tried to improve as
and pub companies, which teetered on the edge of
many areas of the business as possible, on a week-
failure in the 2008-2010 recession, highlighted the
to-week basis, rather than aiming for ‘big ideas’ or
short “tenure”, on average, of directors.
grand strategies.
In contrast, Wetherspoon noted the relative
Frequent calls on pubs by senior executives, the
success, during this fraught financial period, of pub
encouragement of criticism from pub staff and
companies Fuller’s and Young’s, the boards of
customers and the involvement of pub and area
which were dominated by experienced executives,
managers, among others, in weekly decisions, are
or former executives.
the keys to success.
As a result, Wetherspoon has increased the level of
Wetherspoon paid £30.1 million in respect of
experience on the Wetherspoon board by
bonuses and free shares to employees in the period
appointing four “worker directors”.
ended 31 July 2022, of which 98.8% was paid to
All four worker directors started on the “shop floor” staff below board level and 91.5% was paid to staff
and eventually became successful pub managers. working in our pubs.
Three have been promoted to regional management
Wetherspoon has been the biggest corporate
roles. They have worked for the company for an
sponsor of ‘Young Lives vs Cancer’ (previously CLIC
average of 24 years.
Sargent), having raised a total of £20.6 million since
Board composition cannot guarantee future 2002. During the pandemic, our contributions had
success, but it makes sensible decisions, based on been reduced, but since the reopening of our pubs
experience at the coalface of the business, more there have been great efforts seen and our
likely. contributions have bounced back significantly.
The UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the Bonuses and Free Shares
“Code”) is a vast improvement on previous codes,
As indicated above, Wetherspoon has, for many
emphasising the importance of employees,
years (see table below), operated a bonus and
customers and other stakeholders in commercial
share scheme for all employees. Before the
success. It also emphasises the importance of its
pandemic, these awards increased, as earnings
‘comply or explain’ ethos, and the consequent need
increased for shareholders.
for shareholders to engage with companies in order
to understand their explanations.
Su Cacioppo is retiring from the Wetherspoon board In our view, Pubwatch is integral to making towns
today, 7th October 2022, after 31 years with the and cities a safe environment for everyone.
company. Su started as a pub manager in 1991, Therefore, licensees, the police and local authorities
then became an area manager, before eventually throughout the land should give Pubwatch their full
becoming the board director responsible for the support.
personnel, legal and marketing departments in
2008. Current trading and outlook
Sir Richard Beckett KC is also retiring from the As reported above, in the first 9 weeks of the current
board at this year’s AGM, after 13 years as a non- financial year, to 2 October 2022, like-for-like sales
executive director of the company, latterly as head increased by 10.1%, compared to the 9 weeks to 3
of the nominations committee. October 2021.
I would like to thank sincerely Su and Richard for As we have also outlined above, the company has
their dedicated, creative and conscientious work improved its prospects in a number of ways in
over many years. recent financial years - we own an increasing
percentage of freehold properties; the balance sheet
Pubwatch has been strengthened; interest rates have been
Pubwatch is a forum where pubs in a town or city fixed at low levels until 2031; we have a large
can meet together regularly, often with a police contingent of long-serving pub staff and underlying
licensing officer, responsible for pubs in the area. sales are improving.
Local authorities sometimes attend and issues However, as a result of the previously reported
around maintaining good behaviour in pubs and in increases in labour and repair costs and the
the town or city generally are debated. potentially adverse effects of rises in interest rates
and energy costs on the economy, firm predictions
A wide range of initiatives is promoted, including are hard to make.
drink spiking awareness, town centre radio links,
vulnerability training and refusal of entry to all pubs Perhaps the biggest threat to the hospitality industry
in the area for customers who misbehave. is the possibility of further lockdowns and
restrictions.
Professor Francois Balloux, director of the UCL that these plans were jettisoned, early on in the
Genetics Institute, in the Guardian, and by pandemic, in favour of copying China’s lockdown
Professor Robert Dingwall, of Trent University, in approach - an example, perhaps, of Warren
the Telegraph (see pages 54 to 56 of Wetherspoon Buffett’s so-called “institutional imperative” -
News “everyone else has locked down, so we will, too”.
1
Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
Restated1
Notes 53 weeks
52 weeks
ended ended
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
Net cash flow from operating activities 119,347 119,347 (35,302) (35,302)
Net cash flow from investing activities (112,199) (45,890) (57,726) (22,312)
Purchase of own shares for share-based payments (12,808) (12,808) (7,684) (7,684)
Net cash flow from financing activities (12,209) (51,535) (36,015) (25,670)
£000 £000
Assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 13 1,426,862 1,423,826
Intangible assets 12 5,409 5,358
Investment property 14 23,364 10,533
Right-of-use assets 23 419,416 468,538
Other loan receivable 16 2,739 -
Derivative financial instruments 22 61,367 -
Lease assets 23 9,264 9,890
Total non-current assets 1,948,421 1,918,145
Current assets
Lease assets 23 2,001 1,638
Assets held for sale 17 800 -
Inventories 15 26,402 26,853
Receivables 16 29,400 16,427
Current income tax receivables 2,000 1,187
Cash and cash equivalents 18 40,347 45,408
Total current assets 100,950 91,513
Total assets 2,049,371 2,009,658
Current liabilities
Borrowings 20 (5,137) (7,610)
Trade and other payables 19 (282,481) (259,791)
Provisions 21 (2,661) (3,004)
Lease liabilities 23 (48,471) (65,219)
Total current liabilities (338,750) (335,624)
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings 20 (930,404) (883,272)
Derivative financial instruments 22 (2,031) (37,643)
Deferred tax liabilities 7 (34,718) (16,546)
Lease liabilities 23 (421,583) (458,596)
Total non-current liabilities (1,388,736) (1,396,057)
Total liabilities (1,727,486) (1,731,681)
Net assets 321,885 277,977
Shareholders’ equity
The financial statements, on pages 11–42, approved by the board of directors and authorised for issue on 6 October 2022, are
signed on its behalf by:
Share
Notes Share Capital Other Restated1 Currency Restated1 Total1
premium
capital account redemption Reserves Hedging translation Retained
reserve reserve reserve earnings
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
At 26 July 2020 2,408 143,294 2,337 141,002 (66,577) 7,089 87,695 317,248
Total comprehensive income - - - - 47,125 (5,238) (175,278) (133,391)
Loss for the period1 - - - - - - (177,006) (177,006)
Interest-rate swaps: cash flow
22 - - - - 44,551 - - 44,551
hedges
Interest-rate swaps: amount
22 - - - - 11,707 - - 11,707
reclassified to the income statement
Tax on items taken directly to
7 - - - - (9,133) - - (9,133)
comprehensive income1
Currency translation differences - - - - - (5,238) 1,728 (3,510)
The currency translation reserve contains the accumulated currency gains and losses on the long-term financing and balance
sheet translation of the overseas branch. The currency translation difference reported in retained earnings is the retranslation of
the opening reserves in the overseas branch at the current period end’s currency exchange rate.
As at 31 July 2022, the company had distributable reserves of £173.7m (2021: £129.8m).
` 53 weeks 52 weeks
ended ended
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
53 weeks 52 weeks
Auditor’s remuneration
ended ended
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
Fees payable for the audit of the financial statements
– Audit fees 415 303
– Additional audit work (for previous year audit) 85 100
Disposals
Fixed assets 3,492 (16) 3,476 1,548 1,592 3,140
Leases (7,368) – (7,368) (2,200) – (2,200)
Additional costs of disposal 1,857 112 1,969 775 115 890
(2,019) 96 (1,923) 123 1,707 1,830
Impairments
Property, plant and equipment (note 13) – 19,451 19,451 – 1,999 1,999
Investment properties (note 14) – 1,015 1,015 – – –
Right-of-use assets (note 23) – 3,964 3,964 – 2,133 2,133
– 24,430 24,430 – 4,132 4,132
Other
Other property gains (123) – (123) – – –
(123) – (123) – – –
4. Exceptional items
Restated1
53 weeks
52 weeks
ended ended
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
Exceptional operating items
Rank settlement (27,771) –
Local government support grants (1,443) (11,123)
Duty drawback (170) (4,418)
Exceptional operating income (29,384) (15,541)
Equipment – 3,753
Stock losses – 4,158
Staff costs – 15,692
Other – 879
Exceptional operating costs – 24,482
Total exceptional operating (profit)/loss (29,384) 8,941
Rank Settlement
The company has recognised £27,771,000 from HMRC in relation to a long-standing claim, regarding the historic VAT treatment
of slot/fruit machines.
The cash received from HMRC was £17,202,000. An amount of £10,569,000 was withheld to settle tax liabilities.This cash was
received at the beginning of FY23.
Duty drawback
A credit of £170,000 (2021: £4,418,000) for duty drawback was received for perished stock during the period in relation to the
COVID-19 lockdown in the UK.
Disposal programme
The company has offered several of its sites for sale. At the end of the period, one (2021: one) further site had been sold.
In the table on the previous page, the costs classified under the ‘exceptional property losses – disposal programme’ relate to the
loss on disposal of this sold site.
In the year, a total impairment charge of £1,015,000 (2021: £Nil) was incurred in respect of the impairment of our investment
properties.
Taxation
The exceptional tax credit of £2,102,000 relates to the impact of the change in UK tax rate on deferred tax balances.
The tax effect on exceptional items is a charge of £14,664,000 and primarly relates to; derivative contracts (£10,009,000
charge), and the reduction of deferred tax assets in respect of tax losses (£4,653,000 charge).
53 weeks 52 weeks
ended ended
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
Employee support grants disclosed above are amounts claimed by the company under the coronavirus job retention schemes in
the UK and the Republic of Ireland.
For further details of directors’ emoluments including the highest paid director, please see the directors’ remuneration report on
pages 69–77.
2022 2021
Number Number
Full-time equivalents
Head office 332 315
Pub managerial 4,648 4,271
Pub hourly paid staff 19,791 18,736
24,771 23,322
2022 2021
Number Number
Total employees
Head office 342 326
Pub managerial 4,757 4,377
Pub hourly paid staff 37,028 34,322
42,127 39,025
The totals above relate to the monthly average number of employees during the year, not the total of employees at the end of
the year.
For details of the share incentive plan and the deferred bonus scheme, refer to the directors’ remuneration report on pages 69–
77.
The shares awarded as part of the above schemes are based on the cash value of the bonuses at the date of the awards.
These awards vest over three years, with their cost spread over their three-year life. The share-based payment charge above
represents the annual cost of bonuses awarded over the past three years. All awards are settled in equity.
The company operates two share-based compensation plans. In both schemes, the fair values of the shares granted are
determined by reference to the share price at the date of the award. The shares vest at a £Nil exercise price – and there are
no market-based conditions to the shares which affect their ability to vest.
53 weeks 52 weeks
ended ended
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
Finance costs
Interest payable on bank loans and overdrafts 22,869 21,903
Amortisation of bank loan and private placement issue costs (note 10) 1,983 1,746
Interest payable on swaps 9,220 18,228
Interest payable on asset-financing 448 664
Interest payable on private placement 6,238 4,907
Finance costs excluding lease interest 40,758 47,448
The standard rate of corporation tax in the UK is 19.0%. The company’s profits for the accounting period are taxed at a rate of
19.0% (2021: 19.0%).
Restated1 Restated1
53 weeks 53 weeks 53 weeks 52 weeks
52 weeks 52 weeks
ended ended ended ended ended ended
31 July 2022 31 July 2022 31 July 2022 25 July 2021 25 July 2021 25 July 2021
Before Exceptional After Before Exceptional After
exceptional items exceptional exceptional items exceptional
items (note 4) items items (note 4) items
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
Deferred tax:
Origination and reversal of temporary differences1 (4,529) 14,662 10,133 (19,158) (2,546) (21,704)
Prior year deferred tax credit (1,053) – (1,053) (1,157) (2,561) (3,718)
Impact of change in UK tax rate – (2,102) (2,102) – 6,336 6,336
1
Total deferred tax (5,582) 12,560 6,978 (20,315) 1,229 (19,086)
Restated1 Restated1
53 weeks 53 weeks 53 weeks 52 weeks
52 weeks 52 weeks
ended ended ended ended ended ended
31 July 2022 31 July 2022 31 July 2022 25 July 2021 25 July 2021 25 July 2021
Before Exceptional After Before Exceptional After
exceptional items exceptional exceptional items exceptional
items (note 4) items items (note 4) items
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
The taxation charge for the 53 weeks ended 31 July 2022 is based on the pre-exceptional loss before tax of £30.4m and the
estimated effective tax rate before exceptional items for the 53 weeks ended 31 July 2022 of 18.3% (Restated1 2021: 14.8%).
This comprises a pre-exceptional current tax rate of 0.1% (Restated1 2021: 0.2%) and a pre-exceptional deferred tax charge of
18.3% (Restated1 2021: 14.6% charge).
The UK standard weighted average tax rate for the period is 19.0% (2021: 19.0%). The current tax rate is lower than the UK
standard weighted average tax rate, owing to tax losses in the period.
Restated1
53 weeks 53 weeks
52 weeks 52 weeks
ended ended ended ended
31 July 2022 31 July 2022 25 July 2021 25 July 2021
Before After Before After
exceptional exceptional exceptional exceptional
items items items items
£000 £000 £000 £000
(Loss)/profit before income tax (30,448) 26,269 (167,166) (194,636)
Total tax expense reported in the income statement1 (5,560) 7,002 (20,695) (17,630)
1
Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
The main rate of corporation tax is currently 19%, but this will increase to 25% from 1 April 2023. The rate increase has been
substantively enacted; therefore, the deferred tax balances have been recognised at the rate they are expected to reverse. It is
noted that the government intends to hold the main rate of corporation tax at 19% but this decision had not been substantively
enacted at the reporting date.
The company has recognised deferred tax assets of £36.4m (2021: £39.6m), which are expected to be offset against future
profits. This includes a deferred tax asset of £35.8m (2021: £29.4m), in respect of UK tax losses and current-year interest
restrictions capable of reactivation in future periods. This is on the basis that forecasts have been prepared indicating that profits
will arise in the foreseeable future, enabling the assets to be utilised.
As at 31 July 2022, the company had a potential deferred tax asset of £10.9m (2021: £9.1m) relating to capital losses (gross tax
losses £35.0m (2021: £26.1m)) and tax losses in the Republic of Ireland (gross tax losses £18.4m (2021: £18.3m)). Both types
of losses do not expire and will be available to use in future periods indefinitely. A deferred tax asset has not been recognised,
as there is insufficient certainty of recovery.
Basic earnings/(loss) per share is calculated by dividing the profit/(loss) after tax for the period by the weighted average number
of ordinary shares in issue during the financial year of 128,750,155 (2021: 124,668,915) less the weighted average number of
shares held in trust during the financial year of 1,924,810 (2021: 1,841,667). Shares held in trust are shares purchased by the
company to satisfy employee share schemes that have not yet vested.
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share is calculated by dividing the profit/(loss) after tax for the period by the weighted average
number of ordinary shares in issue during the financial year adjusted for both shares held in trust and the effects of potentially
dilutive shares. For the company, the dilutive shares are those that relate to employee share schemes that have not been
purchased in advance and have not yet vested. For the year ended 31 July 2022 and 25 July 2021, the shares were anti-dilutive
due to the movements in the average share price against the exercise price of the share scheme. In the event of making a loss
during the year, the diluted loss per share is capped at the basic earnings per share as the impact of dilution cannot result in a
reduction in the loss per share.
Restated1 52 weeks ended 25 July 2021 (Loss)profit Basic EPS Diluted EPS
1
Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
Restated1
53 weeks
52 weeks
ended ended
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
Bank loans – due after one year (776,871) (49,808) (1,937) (828,616)
Asset-financing obligations – due after one year (8,633) 4,659 – (3,974)
Other loan receivable – due after one year – 2,739 – 2,739
Private placement – due after one year (97,768) – (46) (97,814)
Non-current net borrowings (883,272) (42,410) (1,983) (927,665)
Derivatives
Interest-rate swaps assets - due after one year – – 61,367 61,367
Interest-rate swaps liability – due after one year (37,643) – 35,612 (2,031)
Total derivatives (37,643) – 96,979 59,336
Leases
Lease assets – due before one year 1,638 (1,423) 1,786 2,001
Lease assets – due after one year 9,890 – (626) 9,264
Lease obligations – due before one year (65,219) 40,049 (23,301) (48,471)
Lease obligations – due after one year (458,596) – 37,014 (421,582)
Net lease liabilities (512,287) 38,626 14,873 (458,788)
Net debt after derivatives and lease liabilities (1,395,404) (5,569) 109,869 (1,291,104)
The cash movement on bank loans of £49,808,000 is disclosed in the cash flow statement. The amount is the net of
£50,000,000 which is shown as an advance/(repayment) under bank loans and the £192,000 of loan issue costs.
The cash movement on asset-financing of £7,132,000 is disclosed in the cash flow statement as ‘asset-financing principal
payments’.
Lease obligations represent long-term payables, while lease assets represent long-term receivables – both are, therefore,
disclosed in the table above.
Non-cash movements
The non-cash movement in bank loans and the private placement relate to the amortisation of loan issue costs. The
amortisation charge for the year of £1,983,000 is disclosed in note 6. These are arrangement fees paid in respect of new
borrowings and are charged to the income statement over the expected life of the loans.
The movement in interest-rate swaps relates to the change in the ‘mark to market’ valuations for the year for swaps subject to
hedge accounting.
Non-cash movement in net lease liabilities 53 weeks ended 31 July 2022 31 July
2022
£000
Borrowings
Cash and cash equivalents 174,451 (129,043) – 45,408
Asset-financing obligations – due before one year (7,610) – – (7,610)
Current net borrowings 166,841 (129,043) – 37,798
Bank loans – due after one year (870,572) 95,401 (1,700) (776,871)
Asset-financing obligations – due after one year (15,534) 6,901 – (8,633)
Private placement – due after one year (97,722) – (46) (97,768)
Non-current net borrowings (983,828) 102,302 (1,746) (883,272)
Derivatives
Interest-rate swaps liability – due after one year (82,194) – 44,551 (37,643)
Total derivatives (82,194) – 44,551 (37,643)
Leases
Lease assets – due before one year 1,736 (1,323) 1,225 1,638
Lease assets – due after one year 11,115 – (1,225) 9,890
Lease obligations – due before one year (65,343) 18,875 (18,751) (65,219)
Lease obligations – due after one year (507,803) – 49,207 (458,596)
Net lease liabilities (560,295) 17,552 30,456 (512,287)
Net debt after derivatives and lease liabilities (1,459,476) (9,189) 73,261 (1,395,404)
Non-cash movement in net lease liabilities 52 weeks ended 25 July 2021 25 July
2021
£000
development construction
Cost:
At 26 July 2020 33,417 804 34,221
Additions – 4 4
Transfers 804 (804) –
Disposals (1,474) – (1,474)
At 25 July 2021 32,747 4 32,751
Additions 2,875 429 3,304
Disposals (20) – (20)
At 31 July 2022 35,602 433 36,035
Accumulated amortisation:
At 26 July 2020 (25,326) – (25,326)
Provided during the period (3,151) – (3,151)
Exchange differences (1) – (1)
Disposals 1,085 – 1,085
At 25 July 2021 (27,393) – (27,393)
Provided during the period (3,240) – (3,240)
Disposals 7 – 7
At 31 July 2022 (30,626) – (30,626)
The majority of intangible assets relate to computer software and software development. Examples include the development
costs of the SAP accounting and property-maintenance systems and bespoke J D Wetherspoon applications.
Cost:
At 26 July 2020 1,363,106 295,009 684,732 86,624 2,429,471
Additions 14,783 132 11,251 31,973 58,139
Transfers from investment property 5,768 – – – 5,768
Transfers 41,023 4,164 8,385 (53,572) –
Exchange differences (1,357) (144) (426) (1,157) (3,084)
Disposals (2,623) (4,385) (3,631) – (10,639)
Reclassification 7,842 (7,842) – – –
At 25 July 2021 1,428,542 286,934 700,311 63,868 2,479,655
Additions 37,019 8,407 33,146 33,700 112,272
Transfers from investment property - - - (2,170) (2,170)
Transfers 15,948 1,185 2,572 (19,705) -
Exchange differences (1,257) (53) (201) (242) (1,753)
Transfers to assets held for sale (1,739) - - - (1,739)
Disposals (13,614) (3,708) (4,713) - (22,035)
Reclassification 12,435 (12,435) - - -
At 31 July 2022 1,477,334 280,330 731,115 75,451 2,564,230
Net book amount at 31 July 2022 1,102,801 108,814 142,011 73,236 1,426,862
Net book amount at 25 July 2021 1,096,109 115,576 148,273 63,868 1,423,826
Net book amount at 26 July 2020 1,055,809 128,000 172,345 86,624 1,442,778
During the period, an amount of £42,777,000 (2021: £19,692,000) was spent on the reinvestment of existing pubs. £25,773,000
(2021: £16,858,000) was spent on freehold reversions. £58,789,000 (2021: £24,051,000) was spent on investment in new pubs
and pub extensions. This led to a total capital expenditure of £127,339,000 (2021: £62,671,000).
£000
Cost:
At 26 July 2020 11,842
Additions 4,528
Transfer to property, plant and equipment (5,768)
At 25 July 2021 10,602
Transfer from property, plant and equipment 2,170
Additions 11,763
At 31 July 2022 24,535
Accumulated amortisation:
At 26 July 2020 (315)
Provided during the period (44)
Transfer to property, plant and equipment 290
At 25 July 2021 (69)
Provided during the period (87)
Impairment loss (1,015)
At 31 July 2022 (1,171)
Rental income received in the period from investment properties was £790,000 (2021: £397,000).
Operating costs, excluding depreciation, incurred in relation to these properties amounted to £16,000 (2021: £12,000).
At the year end, three investment properties were independently valued at £9,431,000. During the year, an impairment charge
of £1,015,000 was incurred to adjust the three investment properties which were independently valued from their net book value
to their valuation amount. The remaining three investment properties purchased during the period are valued at their purchase
price paid of £13,933,000. This is deemed a reasonable fair value of these properties. The total fair value of all of our investment
properties at the year end is £23,364,000.
15. Inventories
Bar, food and non-consumable stock held at pubs and the national distribution centre.
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
16. Receivables
This category relates to situations in which third parties owe the company money. Examples include rebates from suppliers
(volume related discounts on certain products) and refunds from councils and governing bodies.
Prepayments relate to advance payments for certain services, for example insurance and tv licences.
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
On 4 August 2022 a cheque was received for £11,347,000 from HMRC in relation to the historic VAT treatment of slot/fruit
machines (see note 4 for further details). This cheque was dated before the year-end of 26 July 2022. However, owing to not
receiving this cheque until after year-end this amount has been recognised as a receivable under ‘other receivables’ rather than
in cash and cash equivalents in note 18.
Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty does not settle its financial obligation with the company. At the period’s end, the
company has assessed the credit risk on amounts due from suppliers, based on historic experience, meaning that the expected
lifetime credit loss was immaterial. Cash and cash equivalents are also subject to the impairment requirements of IFRS9 – no
impairment loss was identified..
These relate to situations in which the company had exchanged contracts to sell a property, but the transaction is not yet
complete. As at 31 July 2022, two sites were classified as held for sale (2021:£Nil).
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates, based on daily bank deposit rates.
On 4 August 2022 a cheque was received for £11,347,000 from HMRC in relation to the historic VAT treatment of slot/fruit
machines (see note 4 for further details). This cheque was dated before the year-end of 26 July 2022. However, owing to not
receiving this cheque until after year-end this amount has been recognised as a receivable under ‘other receivables’ in note 16.
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
Trade payables are obligations to pay for goods and services which are of a trade nature while other payables are of a non-
trade nature.
Included within tax and social security is corporation tax liability owed but not yet due of £280,000 (2021: £20,383,000) and VAT
due of £56,516,000 (2021: £12,069,000).
Accruals relate to allowances made by the company for future anticipated payments, for example; payments to suppliers,
employees’ wages and interest payments to lenders.
Deferred income comprises of money received in advance for future marketing materials and services.
20. Borrowings
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
Lease liabilities
The carrying amounts of lease liabilities and the movements during the period are outlined in note 23.
Asset-financing obligations
Asset-financing obligations relate to asset finance leases of equipment in pubs.
Variable-rate facility
The secured Revolving Credit Facility is £875m. As at 31 July 2022, £730m was drawn down (2021: £680m). There are 14
participating lenders. £20m matures in February 2024 while £855m matures in February 2025. The company has hedged its
interest-rate liabilities to its banks by swapping the floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt, see note 22.
CLBILS
On 7 August 2020 and 18 March 2021, the company agreed to secured loans under the CLBILS for £48,333,332 and
£51,700,000, respectively. The loans have four participating lenders and an average fixed-interest charge of 1.94%; all of loans
mature in August 2023.
Private placement
The fixed-rate facility relates to senior secured notes of £98m. The notes mature in 2026.
21. Provisions
Total
£000
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
Legal claims
The amounts represent a provision for ongoing legal claims brought against the company in the normal course of business, by
customers and employees. Owing to the nature of the business, the company expects to have a continuous provision for
outstanding employee and public liability claims. All claim provisions are considered current and are therefore not discounted.
At 31 July 2022
Borrowings 31,750 51,330 871,461 – 954,541
Borrowings – CLBILS 2,599 100,119 – – 102,718
Private placement 3,655 3,655 107,138 – 114,448
Trade and other payables 213,911 – – – 213,911
Derivatives 3,211 (698) (353) (1,858) 302
Lease liabilities 48,471 48,029 133,041 382,369 611,910
Asset-financing obligations 5,137 4,332 – – 9,469
At 26 July 2021
Borrowings 21,798 21,798 908,406 – 952,002
Borrowings – CLBILS 2,005 2,005 100,138 – 104,148
Private placement 3,655 3,655 10,965 99,828 118,103
Trade and other payables 214,464 – – – 214,464
Derivatives 12,054 11,969 15,842 5,231 45,096
Lease liabilities 65,219 49,587 142,670 427,520 684,996
Asset-financing obligations 7,610 5,145 4,323 – 17,078
The company does not have a specific measure for managing capital structure; instead, the company plans its capital
requirements and manages its loans, dividends and share buybacks accordingly. In a normal trading year, the company
measures loans using a ratio of net debt to EBITDA. With covenant waivers agreed until January 2023, relaxed covenants
effective April and July 2023 and returning to normal covenant levels from October 2023 management’s primary metrics are
liquidity until April 2023 and then profitability and net debt thereafter.
The company has hedged its interest-rate liabilities to its banks by swapping the floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt which
has fixed £770m of these borrowings at rates of between 0.61 and 3.84%. These interest rate swaps are accounted for through
a combination of fair value through profit or loss and hedging reserves within other comprehensive income. The effective
weighted average interest rate of the swap agreements used during the year is 1.61% (2021: 2.42%), fixed for a weighted
average period of 6.4 years (2021: 3.8 years). In addition, the company has entered into forward-starting interest-rate swaps,
detailed in the table below.
Interest-rate sensitivity
The amounts drawn under this agreement can be varied, depending on the requirements of the business. The floating-rate
borrowings are interest-bearing borrowings at rates based on SONIA, fixed for periods of up to one month. During the 53 weeks
ended 31 July 2022, if the interest rates on UK-denominated borrowings had been 1% higher, with all other variables constant,
pre-tax loss for the year would have been reduced by £34,000 and equity increased by £67,660,000. The movement in equity
arises from a change in the ‘mark to market’ valuation of the interest-rate swaps into which the company has entered, calculated
by a 1% shift of the market yield curve. The company notes that an increase in borrowings of 1% would also increase interest
charges. The company considers that a 1% movement in interest rates represents a reasonable sensitivity to potential changes.
However, this analysis is for illustrative purposes only.
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
Analysis of interest-rate profile of financial liabilities
Floating rate due after one year 728,583 676,839
Fixed rate due after one year 100,033 100,033
828,616 776,872
Asset-financing obligations
Fixed rate due in one year 5,137 7,610
Fixed-rate due after one year 3,974 8,633
9,111 16,243
Private placement
Fixed rate due after one year 97,814 97,767
97,814 97,767
935,541 890,882
Restated1
2022 2021
Hedging Reserve £000 £000
Opening 19,452 66,577
Hedging (gains)/losses recognised in comprehensive income (48,452) (44,551)
Hedge ineffectiveness reclassified from the hedging reserve to profit or loss / Amortisation
to profit or loss of cashflow hedge reserve relating to discontinued hedge relationships 4,332 (11,707)
Deferred tax posted to comprehensive income1 11,051 9,133
Closing1 (13,617) 19,452
1
Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
The company has multiple interest-rate swaps which up to 25 July 2021 were designated in a combination of seven hedge
relationships. In addition one new derivative was entered into during the year which has not been designated for hedge
accounting. The impact on the accounts is as follows:
In the year ended 25 July 2021, three of the company’s hedge relationships were discontinued from hedge accounting
as a result of future variable debt no longer being forecast at the same levels as when the instruments were originally
established. Since 25 July 2021, the fair value movements on the respective derivatives are included in profit and
loss. The cash flow hedge reserve was frozen at the time of discontinuation and is amortised to the profit or loss
accordingly. Fair value movements of -£4,332k have been recognised in the income statement as opposed to other
comprehensive income during the financial period.
On 29 October 2021, several interest-rate swaps that were designated within three of the hedge relationships were
novated from HSBC to Barclays. On novation, the interest-rate swap and the variable-rate debt no longer qualified for
hedge accounting, resulting in partial discontinuation being recognised.
On 15 November 2021, a new derivative made up of one interest-rate swap was entered into for the purposes of fixing
variable rate debt from 2029 to 2031. The interest rate swap does not qualify for hedge accounting on the basis that
no hedge documentation was put in place to permit it. During the financial year, fair value movements of £16,230k
were recognised in the income statement as opposed to comprehensive income.
During the year ended 31 July 2022, two relationships were deemed to be partially ineffective as a result of future
variable debt no longer being forecast at the same levels as when the instruments were originally established.
£4,013k was reclassified from the hedging reserve to profit or loss during the financial year as a result of partial
ineffectiveness of this swap. The company reviews and forecasts it’s variable debt financing requirements at each
reporting period. Any changes in forecasts impact the effectiveness of the interest-rate hedges in place which are for
a nominal value of £770m per period.
Remaining in the hedging reserve, is -£14,516k of fair value relating to continuing hedges (Restated1 2021: £19,452k) and
£899k of fair value relating to hedges which have been discontinued (2021: £Nil). The fair value of discontinued hedges will be
recycled to the income statement over the remaining period of maturity.
The amendments provided temporary relief from applying specific hedge accounting requirements to hedging relationships
directly affected by IBOR reform. Hedges have still been measured for effectiveness, with any ineffectiveness being charged in
the income statement. No hedges have been derecognised as a result of the IBOR reform.
Less amount due for settlement within one year (5,137) (7,610)
Amount due for settlement during the second to fifth year, inclusive 3,974 8,633
All asset-financing obligations are in respect of various equipment used in the business. No escalation clauses are included
in the agreements.
23. Leases
The following amounts, relating to lease cashflows, were debited/credited to the income statement during the period:
31 July 25 July
Rent cash flow analysis 2022 2021
£000 £000
Cash outflows relating to capitalised leases 57,630 35,829
Expense relating to short-term leases 10 784
Expense relating to variable element of concessions 8,799 2,801
Total cash outflows 66,439 39,414
The balance sheet shows the following amounts relating to leases. These have been reconciled in sections (a) to (d) below:
31 July 25 July
Balance sheet position 2022 2021
£000 £000
1
Right-of-use asset (a) 419,416 468,538
Set out below are the carrying amounts of right-of-use assets recognised and the movements during the period:
Cost: £000
Additions 4,458
Remeasurement 10,148
During the period, additions related to four new lease contracts that were signed. 41 leases were remeasured as a result of
changes in the agreed payments under the lease contracts and changes in the lease terms. Exchange differences occur as a
result of translating the capitalised leases in the Republic of Ireland. 13 freehold reversions took place in the year while
disposals and derecognised leases totalled six. In the year ended 25 July 2021, lease additions totalled £12,162k and
depreciation £44,532k.
Set out below are the carrying amounts of the lease assets recognised and the movement during the period. The company
sublets several of its leases, with lease assets being the capitalised future rent receivable from sublet sites.
Lease assets
£000
The interest payable and receivable shown in the table above is the interest element of the payments made and received in the
period. These amounts differ from the lease interest charged/credited to the income statement in the period – see note 6. The
amounts charged/credited to the income statement in the period will also include amounts due, yet not paid, in the period. The
incremental borrowing rate applied to lease liabilities and assets was 1.9–3.6%, depending on the lease’s length.
Set out below are the carrying amounts of lease liabilities and the movements during the period:
Lease liability
2022 2021
£000 £000
The company has applied the rent concessions practical expedient during the financial period, allowing reductions in rent
payments due on or before June 2022 to be credited to the income statement, rather than requiring remeasurement of the
lease.
Included within remeasurement of leases are principal payments of £4,726k (2021: £10,993k) credited to the income statement,
and a reduction in associated interest charges of £501k (2021: £2,918k) resulting in a total credit to the income statement of
£5,227k (2021: £13,911k) which is disclosed in cash generated from operations, note 9. Future rental payments, up to the end
of the lease, are capitalised, including any agreed increases.
Future rent payments could change as a result of open-market rent reviews or options being exercised to terminate a lease
early. Any changes in the minimum unavoidable lease payments will be included as a remeasurement of the lease liability. The
accounting policies (page 46) further describe the policy in relation to the termination of leases.
Set out below are the remaining maturities (period between the balance sheet date and the end of the lease) of the lease
liabilities and lease assets, which are undiscounted:
Lease liabilities Lease assets
31 July 25 July 31 July 25 July
2022 2021 2022 2021
£000 £000 £000 £000
31 July 25 July
2022 2021
£000 £000
Eat out to help out (note 1) – (23,248)
Local government grants (note 4) (1,443) (11,123)
Employee support grants (note 5) (4,473) (208,986)
(5,916) (243,357)
The government support in the table above should be viewed in context of the contribution to the economy as on page 6.
The company had some other sites in the property pipeline; however, any legal commitment is contingent on planning and
licensing. Therefore, there are no commitments at the balance sheet date.
All of these companies are dormant and contain no assets or liabilities and are, therefore, immaterial. As a result, consolidated
accounts have not been produced. The company has an overseas branch in the Republic of Ireland.
The registered office of all of the above companies is the same as that for J D Wetherspoon plc, as disclosed on the final page
of these accounts.
As required by IAS 24, the following information is disclosed about key management compensation.
Key management comprises the executive directors, non-executive directors and management board, as detailed on page 65.
For additional information about directors’ emoluments, please refer to the directors’ remuneration report on pages 69–77.
The total authorised number of 2p ordinary shares is 500,000,000 (2021: 500,000,000). All issued shares are fully paid.
While the memorandum and articles of association allow for preferred, deferred or special rights to attach
to ordinary shares, no shares carried such rights at the balance sheet date.
On 23 September 2022, the government announced a growth plan which included an intention for the main rate of corporation
tax to remain at 19%. This announcement does not affect the year ended 31 July 2022 and the change has not been
substantively enacted at the reporting date.
On 26 September 2022, the company announced that 32 of its pubs will be put on the market as part of a one-off disposal
programme. Mangaement has concluded this to be a non-adjusting event on the basis that events and conditions arose after
the end of the financial period. Of the 32 pubs being marketed, 10 are freehold and 22 are leasehold units. A reasonable
estimate of the financial effect cannot be made at this time, while valuations are still being determined,
The carrying value of fixed assets is reviewed annually Company receives the grant. Grants will be recognised
for impairment, with any impairment losses recognised net in the income statement, on a systematic basis,
in the income statement. over the same period during which the expenses, for
which the grant was intended to compensate, are
Assets held for sale recognised.
Where the value of an asset will be recovered through
a sale transaction, rather than continuing use, the asset Grants are disclosed in the note 24 to the accounts on
is classified as held for sale. It is the view of page 41, which discloses government support.
management that the Company is not committed to
selling a site until a contract for sale has been Leases
exchanged. Assets held for sale are valued at the lower The Company has leases for properties across the UK
of book value and fair value, less any costs of disposal, and the Republic of Ireland. There are no other
and are no longer depreciated. material leases recognised under other IFRS 16
categories.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net Lessee accounting
realisable value. Cost is calculated on a weighted On completion of a contract (the point at which a
average basis, with net realisable value being the contract becomes legally binding), the Company
estimated selling price, less any costs of disposal. assesses whether the contract is or contains a lease.
Provision is made for obsolete, slow-moving or A lease is present where the contract conveys, over a
damaged inventory, where appropriate. period of time, the right to control the use of an
identified asset in exchange for a consideration.
Bar and food inventory is recognised as an expense
when sold. Non-consumable inventory is recognised as
The lease liability is measured initially at the present
an expense immediately on receipt at a pub or hotel.
value of unavoidable lease payments over the term of
Provisions the lease which in all cases is to the end of the lease.
Provisions are recognised when the Company has These payments are discounted at the Company’s
a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of incremental borrowing rate. For sites at which rent is
a past event and it is probable that an outflow of payable as a percentage of revenue, the lease liability
resources will be required to settle the obligation and is measured at the present value of the unavoidable
a reliable estimate can be made of that minimum guarantee payments over the term of the
obligation’s amount. lease. While any amounts above this minimum amount
will be expensed to the income statement.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognised when bar and food products Where a lease is identified, the Company recognises a
are served to customers, after deducting discounts and right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability.
sales-based taxes. The lease assets are presented as a separate line in
the balance sheet.
Slot/fruit machine sales are recognised as the net
proceeds taken from the machines, after deducting Leases with terms of under one year are not
gaming duty. capitalised.
borrowing rate. The lease assets are presented as a to assets are met. For the purpose of cash flow
separate line in the balance sheet. reporting, interest paid and received is considered
to be operating cash flows.
Remeasurement
When the Company agrees to a term extension or a Income taxes
change to the minimum payments made under a lease, Current tax assets and liabilities are measured at the
the lease liability or asset will be remeasured on that amount expected to be recovered from, or paid to, the
date; the resulting increase or decrease to the asset or taxation authorities, based on tax rates and laws which
liability will be accounted for with an offsetting are enacted or substantively enacted by the balance
adjustment to the right-of-use asset. Reasurement is sheet date.
completed at the new incremental borrowing rate. Any
remeasurement adjustment which reduces the right-of- Deferred income tax is recognised on all temporary
use asset below zero will be credited to the income differences arising between the tax bases of assets
statement. and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial
statements, with the following exceptions:
IFRS 16 Rent concession
The Company has adopted the amendment to IFRS 16 Where the temporary difference arises from an
which provides lessees with an exemption from asset or liability in a transaction which, at the time of
assessing whether a COVID-19 related rent the transaction, affects neither accounting nor
concession is a lease modification. taxable profit or loss.
Financial instruments
Right-of-use asset
Financial assets and liabilities are recognised on the
The right-of-use asset comprises the initial
date on which the Company becomes party to the
measurement of the corresponding lease liability, any
contractual provisions of the instrument giving rise to
initial direct costs and the cost of any obligation to
the asset or liability.
restore the site at the end of the lease. They are
subsequently measured at cost less accumulated Financial assets held at amortised cost
depreciation and impairment losses. Right-of-use Financial assets held at amortised cost are non-
assets are depreciated over the term of the lease. derivative financial assets which are held within a
business model where the objective is to collect the
Termination and break of leases contractual cash flow at the same time as the
Where the Company notifies the landlord to purchase contractual terms give rise to cash flows which are
the freehold of a leasehold site, the lease is solely payments of principal and interest. They are
derecognised with any difference in the value of the included in current assets, except for maturities greater
lease liability and the right-of-use asset charged to the than 12 months after the balance sheet date. These
income statement as a property gain or loss. are classified as non-current assets.
Cash and cash equivalents and the Company’s floating-rate borrowings, meaning
Cash and short-term deposits in the balance sheet that floating interest rates paid should be identical to
comprise cash at bank and in hand and short-term those amounts received for a given amount of
deposits. For the purpose of the cash flow statement, borrowings.
cash and cash equivalents comprise cash and
short-term deposits as defined above. Bank overdrafts The Company tests hedge effectiveness prospectively
are shown within current financial liabilities on the using the hypothetical derivative method and compares
balance sheet. Cash and cash equivalents include the changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument
recognition of amounts for cash in transit, including with those in the fair value of the hedged item
electronic card payments not yet receipted as these are attributable to the hedged risk.
highly liquid and low credit risk.
Hedges could be deemed ineffective if the:
Credit risk Period over which the borrowings were drawn were
Credit risk losses arise when debtors fail to pay their changed. This could result in the borrowings being
obligation to the Company. The Company assesses made at a different floating rate than the interest-rate
credit risk, based on historic experience. The Company swap.
has no significant history of non-payment; as a result, Gross amount of borrowings were less than the
the expected credit losses on financial assets are not value swapped.
material. Impact of LIBOR reform were to cause a mismatch
between the interest rate of the swaps and that of the
Financial liabilities company’s debt.
The Company classifies its financial liabilities as other
financial liabilities. These are measured at fair value on The effective element of any gain or loss from
initial recognition and subsequently measured at remeasuring the derivative designated as the hedging
amortised cost, using the effective-interest method. instrument is recognised in other comprehensive
income with the ineffective element recognised
Trade and other payables immediately in the income statement.
These are recognised initially at fair value
and subsequently at amortised cost, using the Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedge
effective-interest method. expires, is sold, terminated or no longer meets the
Company’s risk management objective.
Bank loans and borrowings
Interest-bearing bank loans and other borrowings are Share capital
recorded initially at fair value of consideration received, Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental
net of direct issue costs. Borrowings are subsequently costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or
recorded at amortised cost, with any difference options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax,
between the amount recorded initially and the from the proceeds.
redemption value recognised in the income statement
over the period of the bank loans, using the effective- When the Company repurchases its own shares,
interest method. the cost of the shares purchased and associated
transaction costs are taken directly to equity and
Bank loans and loan notes are classified as current deducted from retained earnings. The nominal value of
liabilities, unless the Company has an unconditional shares purchased is transferred from share capital to
right to defer settlement of the liability for at least the capital redemption reserve.
12 months after the balance sheet date.
Foreign currencies
Derivative financial instruments Transactions denominated in foreign currencies
and hedging activities are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing
Derivative financial instruments used by the at the transaction date. Monetary assets and liabilities
Company are stated at fair value on initial recognition are translated at year-end exchange rates, with the
and at subsequent balance sheet dates. resulting exchange differences taken to the income
statement.
Hedge accounting is used to mitigate the Company’s
exposure to variable interest rate risks on borrowings. The Irish branch’s results are translated at the average
Derivatives qualify for hedge accounting only where, at exchange rate for the reporting period; the balance
inception, there is formal designation and sheet is translated at the year-end exchange rate.
documentation of the hedging relationship, there is an Resulting exchange differences are recognised in
economic relationship between the item being hedged comprehensive income.
and the hedging derivative and credit risk does not
dominate the economic relationship. Revaluation gains and losses on the long-term
financing of the Irish branch are recognised in
The Company classifies its interest-rate swap comprehensive income.
derivatives as cash flow hedges, on the basis they
hedge the exposure to variable cash flows. A hedging
ratio of 1:1 is adopted between the interest-rate swaps
Retirement benefits
Contributions to personal pension schemes are Alternative performance measures (APMs)
recognised in the income statement in the period in The Company uses several alternative performance
which they fall due. All contributions are in respect of measures (APM’s) throughout the annual report and
a defined contribution scheme. Once the contributions accounts which are not defined by International
have been paid, the Company has no future payment Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). APMs are used
obligations. in conjunction with IFRS measures in reporting
financial information and assessing performance, but
Dividends are not given greater prominence. The APMs used
Dividends recommended by the board, but unpaid at have been defined below, alongside reconciliations to
each period end, are not recognised in the financial IFRS measures:
statements until they are paid (in the case of the interim
dividend) or approved by shareholders at the annual Free cash flow - the calculation of free cash flow is
general meeting (in the case of the final dividend). based on the net cash generated by business activities
and available for investment in new pub developments
Changes in net debt
and extensions to current pubs, after funding interest,
These are both the cash and non-cash movements
corporation tax, lease principal payments, loan issue
of the year, including movements in asset-financing,
costs, all reinvestment in information technology, head
borrowings, cash and cash equivalents.
office and pubs trading at the start of the period
(excluding extensions) and the purchase of own shares
Share-based charges
under the employee share incentive plan. See
The Company has an employee share incentive plan
reconciliation on page 12.
which awards shares to qualifying employees; there is
also a deferred bonus scheme which awards shares to
Like for like – compares year on year performance of
directors and senior managers, subject to specific
pubs and hotels which were trading in the equivalent
performance criteria.
weeks in both FY22 and FY21.
The cost of the awards in respect of these plans is
measured by reference to the fair value at the date at Before exceptional items – this measure excludes
which they are granted and is amortised as an expense exceptional items, which are presented separately to
over the vesting period. In assessing the initial fair allow shareholders to better understand financial
value, no account is taken of any vesting conditions, performance in the year, when compared with that of
other than market conditions linked to the price of the previous years and trends. See exceptional items
shares of the Company. reconciliation on page 17.
As our starting point we are allocating carbon To date, the following steps have been taken to reduce
emissions to every product which we sell, including the use of single-use plastics:
food, drinks and hotel rooms. Where detailed data is
not currently available, we are making assumptions Plastic straws were removed in December 2017 and
based on industry averages. Over time, this data replaced with 100% biodegradable and 100%
quality will improve. Reducing our scope 3 emissions recyclable paper straws and wrappers.
will rely ultimately on a partnership approach with our Complimentary water fountains available in all pubs,
UK and worldwide suppliers and on their own plans to offering an alternative to plastic water bottles.
reduce carbon emissions. Plastic containers used in the kitchen are now
reusable.
Pollution and waste The Company no longer uses cling film.
As a business, we aim to minimise waste and Plastic milk cartons are segregated and recycled
maximise recycling. Our target is to recycle 95% of separately. Coloured lids have been replaced with clear
recyclable waste. recyclable lids.
Working with suppliers and with the support of
The pubs and head office segregate waste into a WRAP and the Sustainable Restaurant Association to
minimum of seven streams: glass, tin/cans, cooking oil, reduce and, where possible, remove the use of plastic
paper/cardboard, plastic, lightbulbs and general waste. packaging for food.
In addition, food waste is also separated and sent for
anaerobic digestion. Any remaining non-recyclable The Company does not create any toxic emissions or
waste is sent to waste-to-energy power plants which waste. Electronic waste is disposed of using
reduce CO2 and the use of fossil fuels. No waste is specialised contractors to safely dispose of the items.
sent to landfill.
Where possible, computer equipment is sent suppliers
The Company has a national distribution centre for to refurbish and reuse. Any disposal is compliant with
food, some bottled drinks and non-consumable the EU Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment
products. This also includes a recycling centre. When (WEEE) directive.
making deliveries to pubs, lorries collect mixed
recycling, used cooking oil, textiles and aluminium for On construction sites, there is a site waste
return to the recycling centre for processing. management plan, managed by the main contractor
and covering all waste disposal from sites.
During the financial year 2021/22, the pubs sent 10,681
tonnes of waste to the recycling centre, an increase of Human rights
4,723 tonnes, or 79%, on the previous year. The Company is committed to respecting human rights
across our business by complying with all relevant laws
Any unwanted, yet fit-for-consumption, food is donated and regulations. The Company prohibits any form of
to our charity partner FareShare, which distributes it to discrimination, forced, trafficked or child labour and is
food banks, community centres and others in need. committed to safe and healthy working conditions for all
individuals, whether employed by the Company directly
Cooking oil is converted to biodiesel for agricultural or by a supplier in our supply chain.
use.
In the course of normal business, the company continually assesses significant risks, categorised based on impact and
likelihood. The following risks, while not intended to be a comprehensive analysis, constitute (in the opinion of the board)
the principal risks and uncertainties currently facing the company.
Nigel Connor
Company Secretary
6 October 2022
This report outlines the assessment performed by management in establishing the key climate-risks and opportunities to the
business which have been identified to date, split by the four TCFD pillars; governance, risk management, strategy and metrics
& targets. Management deems these disclosures to be compliant with TCFD’s recommendations.
Governance
Climate change is an established risk on the Company’s risk register. It is reviewed with prominence equal to that of the
Company’s other risks. The board of directors has overall responsibility for the risk register, which is a permanent item on the
board’s monthly agenda.
The Company’s energy and environment group meets on a fortnightly basis. The Group is chaired by Ben Whitley (Finance
Director). The group tracks the progress of goals and targets, and will monitor the Company’s science-based target plan once
submitted to the Science Based Target initiative (SBTi) by the end of the calendar year. Key initiatives discussed by this focus
group are communicated to the business via environment champions, who are responsible for communicating energy,
environment, waste & recycling best practice back to their pubs. All employees receive training on environmental matters.
Risk management
As mentioned on page 82, the internal audit department is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risk register,
including identifying and assessing of new and current risks. Risks are categorised according to the probability of occurrence
and severity of impact. The internal audit team works alongside risk owners to determine and document mitigations to each of
the Company’s risks.
The Company is a member of the Zero Carbon forum – a group which supports the hospitality sector to meet its carbon
reduction targets. The Company is also working with Carbon Intelligence to develop and implement a robust and credible
carbon reduction strategy through the implementation of science based targets.
Strategy
The Company recognises that it faces both environmental risks and opportunities relating to climate change. To date,
discussions and analysis has focused on, but is not limited to, the following impacts on the business; carbon taxes, availability of
electricity, changes to transport networks, changes in customers’ behaviour, coastal erosion, flooding, supply chain disruption,
availability and pricing of products. Management has disclosed three of these risks and one opportunity. Management assess
the impact of climate charge over the short, medium and long term and estimate the financial impact.
As climate change evolves, management will continue to assess new risks and opportunities, measure against those already
identified, explore potential mitigations, and in the future, consider incorporating into the strategic and financial planning of the
business. The Company deems the current energy saving and consumption reduction ideas in place to be a resilient and
positive start, but will continue to assess the impact and changes required. (See pages 49-50 for details).
Risk/opportunity Impact Risk type Time Financial
horizon impact
Lack of availability of A lack of availability of products would increase costs and Physical/ Medium High risk
products from the supply lower profitability. Any increased costs passed onto the transitional
chain. customer or a reduced availability of products available to
purchase could affect sales.
Increased likelihood of Pub closures would affect the profitability of the Company, Physical Medium Medium risk
flooding from more rain through lower sales, potential insurance premiums and the
and rising sea levels. relocation of staff.
Negative stakeholder Reputational damage could result in fewer customers visiting Transitional Short High risk
perception if J D the pubs and therefore lower sales.
Wetherspoon is seen to The Company may struggle to attract investors, affecting its
not be doing enough to ability to access finance.
tackle climate change.
UK heat waves may result If temperatures were to rise by 2° C or more, produce such as Physical Long Opportunity
in produce typically grown tomatoes, oranges, grapes for wine and more could be grown
in warmer climates being in the UK. This could lower the Company’s carbon footprint
grown closer to home. while reducing produce costs due to less transportation and
import fees.
Key
Risk Type Time horizon Financial Impact2
Physical Risks due to longer-term shifts in climate patterns Long 25 years + High risk >£25m
such as weather disruption. Medium 10-25 years Medium risk £5-25m
Transitional Risks in transitioning to a lower-carbon economy, for Short 0-10 years Low risk <£5m
example new policies or regulations. 2
Annual impact
1
Risk categories defined by the TCFD
The Company has reported its GHG emissions since 2014. Emission and consumption data can be found on page 68. In the
future, once established, this will include scope 3. A list of the environmental initiatives already under way can be found on
pages 49-50.
Our auditor’s report for the 52 weeks ended 25 July 2021 included the
following matters which have not been reported as a key audit matter in our
current period’s audit report:
KAM
In the graph below, we have presented the key audit matters, significant risks and other risks relevant to the audit.
The impairment of property, plant and In responding to the key audit matter, we performed the following
equipment (“PPE”) and right of use assets audit procedures:
(“ROU assets”) Considering the accounting policy for compliance with IAS 36 and
that the application by the company is consistent with the stated
We identified impairment of PPE and ROU policy;
assets as one of the most significant assessed Assessing the design effectiveness of controls, including the
risks of material misstatement due to error. methodology applied by management to identify indicators of
impairment and when performing their impairment test for each of the
PPE represents the largest balance on the
relevant pubs;
balance sheet (31 July 2022: £1.4bn / 25 July
Understanding and challenging management on the approach to
2021: £1.4bn). Further to this, there are ROU
creating the watchlist and challenging management on its
assets recognised which must be considered for
completeness, including any pubs which are performing below the
impairment (31 July 2022: £0.4bn / 25 July
remainder of the estate since returning to a more “normal” trading
2021: £0.5bn).
period;
The directors consider each individual pub to be Recalculating the arithmetical accuracy and integrity of
a separate cash generating unit. The directors management’s impairment model, by checking the internal
are required to undertake an impairment consistency of formulae and performing sample checks on the inputs
assessment where events indicate that the and assumptions made in managements model to identify indicators
carrying value of the cash generating unit may of impairment;
not be recoverable. Validating that the methodology of the impairment exercise is
consistent with the requirements of IAS36 Impairment of Assets,
The process for measuring and recognising including appropriate identification of CGUs and the allocation of costs
impairment under International Accounting in the value in use calculations;
Standard (IAS) 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’ is Agreeing a sample of impairment model inputs to supporting
complex and requires significant judgement, documentation, including lease agreements, historic pub profit figures
including assumptions within management’s and the fixed asset register;
assessment of the impact of the geopolitical and Engaging our internal valuation experts to independently calculate
cost of living factors on future trading activity for the discount rate and compare it to the discount rate applied in the
each pub, the determination of the appropriate models by management;
discount rate to be applied to those cashflows, Identifying pubs with declining profits from our revenue testing
as well as the valuation of properties. which could have indicators of impairment;
Management identify pubs which have an Comparing management’s assumptions within the impairment
indicator of impairment (management’s model against external economic forecasts reflecting the uncertainties
“Watchlist” of pubs) and management then risk inherent within the current economic environment;
rate the Watchlist of pubs into “moderate” and Obtaining management’s risk categorisation between ‘high-risk’
“high risk” based on recent trading performance. and ‘moderate-risk’ pubs and ensuring the correct classification of
Our significant risk has been pinpointed to those pubs in the impairment review and consistency between periods;
pubs classified as high risk on management’s Obtaining corroborative evidence to support management’s
“Watchlist” of pubs. judgements used for those pubs with indicators of impairment, with
special audit consideration on pubs classified as “high risk” including
Relevant disclosures in the Annual Report evidence for changes made to the pubs, discussions with pub
and Financial Statements 2022 managers / area managers, review of pub space and plans and
Financial Statements: Note 13, PPE evidence for changes made to operations;
Accounting Policies: Important estimates, Performing sensitivity analysis based on reasonably possible
Impairment of PPE changes to key assumptions determined by management being the
Corporate Governance: Significant financial discount and cost inflation rates; and
reporting items. Assessing the disclosures in the notes to the financial statements
against the requirements of IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, in particular
the requirement to disclose further sensitivities for CGUs where a
reasonably possible change in a key assumption would cause an
impairment.
Key observations
We identified that additional immaterial impairments were required in
relation to the impairment of PPE and ROU assets.
Going concern In responding to the key audit matter, we performed the following
We identified going concern as a significant risk audit procedures:
due to the ongoing impact of Covid-19, obtained and challenged management’s base case forecast for the
geopolitical and inflationary cost pressures on period to 28 January 2024, together with supporting evidence for all
current and forecast trading performance, key trading, working capital and cash flow assumptions;
liquidity levels and covenant compliance and the obtained and challenged management’s downside scenario, which
challenges these factors present to reflects a reasonably possible sales decline and management’s
management when preparing their going response via controllable mitigating actions;
concern assessment. tested the clerical accuracy of management’s assessment,
including forecast liquidity and covenant compliance under
In addition to this, as auditors, we are required
management’s base and downside scenarios;
to “obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
assessed the robustness of forecasts prepared by comparison to
about the appropriateness of management's use
forecasts made in prior periods, including assessing management’s
of the going concern assumption in the
historic ability to forecast, and in light of our understanding of the
preparation and presentation of the financial
company’s operations;
statements and to conclude whether there is a
following our review of management’s board memorandum, we
material uncertainty about the entity's ability to
identified the areas of business operations which could be most
continue as a going concern” (ISA (UK) 570).
affected by rising costs and sought evidence to corroborate
Management has modelled a base case management’s attempts to quantify the potential impact. We also
forecast in which, over the period to 28 January sought evidence to support that the mitigating actions highlighted by
2024 as it continues to emerge from the management would be achievable and effective;
pandemic, sales, profit and cash flow growth applied professional scepticism in performing our own independent
continues. Management have anticipated within reverse stress test of management’s cash flow forecast models and
this forecast continued high levels of inflation, their impact on forecast liquidity and banking covenants to identify
particularly on food products, wages and under what circumstances the company’s covenants and liquidity
repairs. would be compromised, and whether the scenario has no more than a
remote possibility of occurring;
A more cautious “downside” scenario has been obtained correspondence in relation to covenant waivers and
analysed, where sales decline by 5% in the 52 amendments and confirmed that the terms and conditions therein
weeks ending 30 July 2023, compared to last were consistent with those applied by management in their base case
comparable full trading period pre the pandemic and downside scenario forecasts, including the period over which the
and then converges with the base case for the banks have confirmed that these waivers and amendments are in
remainder of the going concern period to 28 place; and
January 2024. The company has reviewed, and assessed the disclosures made within the financial statements for
is satisfied with, the mitigating actions it could consistency with management’s assessment of going concern and
take if such a decline were to occur. Such whether they are in line with the accounting standards.
actions could include reducing discretionary
expenditure and/or implementing price Key observations
increases. We have nothing to report in addition to that stated in the ‘Conclusions
The company has two EBITDA-related relating to going concern’ section of our report.
covenants attached to two of their debt facilities, .
the RCF and USPP loan. These covenants .
have been waived until the end of January 2023
(Q2 FY23), with the first forecast assessment
period set to be the end of April 2023 (Q3 FY23)
albeit at a reduced level to normal covenant
levels. Covenants will return to normal levels
from the end of the October 2023 (Q1 FY24).
We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and performing the audit, and in evaluating the effect of identified
misstatements on the audit and of uncorrected misstatements, if any, on the financial statements and in forming the
opinion in the auditor’s report.
Materiality for the current period is lower than we determined for the period ended
25 July 2021. We lowered materiality as we did not consider an increase from the
prior year and / or pre-Covid levels to be appropriate given profitability has not yet
returned to pre Covid-19 levels. The materiality was consistent with 2019
materiality, the last normal period of trading prior to Covid-19.
Performance We set performance materiality at an amount less than materiality for the
materiality used to financial statements as a whole to reduce to an appropriately low level the
drive the extent of our probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements
testing exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole.
Whether there were any significant control deficiencies identified in prior years
Whether there were any changes in senior management during the period
Specific materiality We determine specific materiality for one or more particular classes of
transactions, account balances or disclosures for which misstatements of lesser
amounts than materiality for the financial statements as a whole could reasonably
be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of
the financial statements.
Specific materiality We determined a lower level of specific materiality for certain specific areas,
being directors’ remuneration and related party transactions.
Threshold for £250,000 and misstatements below that threshold that, in our view, warrant
communication reporting on qualitative grounds.
The graph below illustrates how performance materiality interacts with our overall materiality and the tolerance for
potential uncorrected misstatements.
Overall materiality
TFPUM
£1.250m, 25%
Other information
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the
Annual Report and Financial Statements, other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our
opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly
stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing
so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge
obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or
apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether there is a material misstatement in the financial
statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude
that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.
In our opinion, the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance
with the Companies Act 2006.
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
the information given in the strategic report and the directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial
statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements and those reports have been prepared in accordance
with applicable legal requirements;
the information about internal control and risk management systems in relation to financial reporting processes and
about share capital structures, given in compliance with rules 7.2.5 and 7.2.6 in the Disclosure Rules and Transparency
Rules sourcebook made by the Financial Conduct Authority (the FCA Rules), is consistent with the financial statements
and has been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements; and
information about the company’s corporate governance code and practices and about its administrative, management
and supervisory bodies and their committees complies with rules 7.2.2, 7.2.3 and 7.2.7 of the FCA Rules.
Matters on which we are required to report under the Companies Act 2006
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit,
we have not identified material misstatements in:
the strategic report or the directors’ report; or
the information about internal control and risk management systems in relation to financial reporting processes and
about share capital structures, given in compliance with rules 7.2.5 and 7.2.6 of the FCA Rules.
The Listing Rules require us to review the directors' statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that
part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK
Corporate Governance Code specified for our review.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the
Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements, or our knowledge obtained
during the audit:
the directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the
going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements and the directors’ identification of any material
uncertainties to the company’s ability to continue to do so over a period of at least twelve months from the date of
approval of the financial statements.
the directors’ explanation in the Annual Report and Financial Statements as to how they have assessed the prospects
of the company, over what period they have done so and why they consider that period to be appropriate, and their
statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the company will be able to continue in operation and
meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of their assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention
to any necessary qualifications or assumptions;
the directors’ statement that they consider the annual report and financial statements taken as a whole is fair,
balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the company’s
performance, business model and strategy;
the directors’ confirmation in the annual report that they have carried out a robust assessment of the principal and
emerging risks facing the company including the impact of Covid-19 and the disclosures in the annual report that
describe the principal risks, procedures to identify emerging risks and an explanation of how they are being managed or
mitigated including the impact of Covid-19;
the section of the annual report that describes the review of the effectiveness of the company’s risk management and
internal control systems, covering all material controls, including financial, operational and compliance controls; and
the section of the annual report describing the work of the audit committee, including significant issues that the audit
committee considered relating to the financial statements and how these issues were addressed.
As explained more fully in the directors’ responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the
financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the
directors determine is
necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the company’s ability to continue as a
going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of
accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic
alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with
ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could
reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting
Council’s website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. The description forms part of the auditor’s report.
Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line
with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud.
Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that material misstatements in the financial
statements may not be detected, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with ISAs
(UK).
The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below:
We obtained an understanding of legal and regulatory frameworks applicable to the company and the industry in
which it operates through review of prior year financial statements, enquiries of management, the finance team, Head of
Legal and the Audit Committee. We determined that the following laws and regulations were most significant: UK-
adopted international accounting standards, IFRIC Interpretations, Companies Act 2006, Listing Rules and the UK
Corporate Governance Code;
We enquired of management and the board of directors whether they were aware of any instances of non-
compliance with laws and regulations and whether they had any knowledge of actual, suspected alleged fraud;
We enquired of management, the finance team, Head of Legal and the Audit Committee about the company’s policies
and procedures relating to the identification, evaluation and compliance with laws and regulations and the detection and
response to the risks of fraud and the establishment of internal controls to mitigate risks related to fraud or non-
compliance with laws and regulations;
We obtained an understanding of how the company is complying with those legal and regulatory frameworks by
making enquiries of management, those responsible for legal and compliance procedures and the company secretary.
Our findings were corroborated by review of the board minutes and papers provided to the audit committee and a
review of HMRC correspondence;
We assessed the susceptibility of the company’s financial statements to material misstatement, including how fraud
might occur. Audit procedures performed by the engagement team included:
- Obtaining an understanding of how those charged with governance considered and addressed the potential
for override of controls or other inappropriate influence over the financial reporting process;
- Challenging assumptions and judgements made by management in its significant accounting estimates;
- Identifying and testing journal entries with a focus on journals indicating large or unusual transaction or
account combinations based on our understanding of the business, including material journal entries
impacting the profit and loss accounts as well as journal entries posted by key management personnel;
- Applying audit data analytics techniques across the revenue population to match revenue recorded to cash
receipts and investigating and corroborating any expected exceptions;
- Applying audit data analytics techniques across the costs of goods sold population to match revenue recorded
to cost of goods sold and investigating and corroborating any expected exceptions;
- Assessing matters reported through the company’s whistleblowing programme and the results of
management’s investigation of such matters; and
-
- Identifying and assessing the design effectiveness of controls management has in place to prevent and detect
fraud.
These audit procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements were free from
fraud or error. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one
resulting from error and detecting irregularities that result from fraud is inherently more difficult than detecting those that
result from error, as fraud may involve collusion, deliberate concealment, forgery or intentional misrepresentations. Also,
the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from events and transactions reflected in the financial
statements, the less likely we would become aware of it;
The engagement partner assessed the appropriateness of the collective competence and capabilities of the
engagement team, by considering the engagement team’s understanding of, and practical experience with, audit
engagements of a similar nature and complexity;
We communicated relevant laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all engagement team members and
remained alert to any indications of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit.
The period of total uninterrupted engagement including previous renewals and reappointments of the firm is 5 years,
covering the periods ended 29 July 2018 to 31 July 2022.
The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided to the company and we remain
independent of the company in conducting our audit.
Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the audit committee.
Su Cacioppo, Personnel and Legal Director, aged 55 Ben Whitley, Finance Director, aged 44
DIRECTORS
Joined in 1991 and was appointed to the board in 2008. She is a Joined in 1999 and was appointed to the board in 2015. He is a
graduate of South Bank University and London Guildhall graduate of Durham University and qualified as a chartered
University. management accountant in 2012.
Ⓑ Ⓜ Ⓑ Ⓜ
James Ullman, Personnel and Retail Auditor Director, aged 51
Joined in 1994 and was appointed to the board in 2022. He is a
graduate of Brighton University and Birmingham City University.
He became a chartered internal auditor in 2011.
Ⓑ Ⓜ
Hudson Simmons, Employee Director, aged 50 Debbie Whittingham, Employee Director, aged 53
DIRECTORS
EMPLOYEE
Joined in 1997 and was appointed to the board in 2021 and is Joined in 1992 and was appointed to the board in 2021. She is
PEOPLE
area manager for the Sheffield area. He is a graduate of regional manager for the West Midlands.
Nottingham Trent University. Ⓑ
Ⓑ
Ben Thorne, Senior Independent Director, aged 63 Debra van Gene, Non-Executive Director, aged 68
Appointed to the board in 2020. He is a graduate of Westminster Appointed to the board in 2006 and is chair of the remuneration
University. He qualified as a solicitor in 1985. He is managing committee. She is a graduate of Oxford University. She has
director at WH Ireland. previously been a partner at Heidrick and Struggles Inc and a
Ⓑ Ⓐ Ⓝ Ⓡ commissioner with the Judicial Appointments Commission.
NON-EXECUTIVE
DIRECTORS
Ⓑ Ⓐ Ⓝ Ⓡ
Harry Morley Non-Executive Director, aged 57 Sir Richard Beckett, Non-Executive Director, aged 78
Appointed to the board in 2016 and is chair of the audit committee. Appointed to the board in 2009 and is chair of the nomination
He is a graduate of Oxford University. He is a non-executive committee. He was called to the bar in 1965 and took silk in 1987.
director of The Mercantile Investment Trust plc, TheWorks.co.uk He was one of the pre-eminent practitioners in regulatory and
plc and of Cadogan Group. He is a trustee of the Ascot Authority. licensing matters.
He qualified as a chartered accountant in 1991. Ⓑ Ⓐ Ⓝ Ⓡ
Ⓑ Ⓐ Ⓝ Ⓡ
Nigel Connor, Company Secretary and Legal Director, aged 53 David Capstick, IT and Property Director, aged 61
Joined in 2009 and was appointed company secretary in 2014. He Joined in 1998 and appointed to the management board in 2003.
is a graduate of Newcastle University and qualified as a solicitor in He is a graduate of the University of Surrey.
1997. Ⓜ
Ⓑ Ⓜ Martin Geoghegan, Operations Director, aged 53
Michael Barron, Commercial Director, aged 36 Joined in 1994 and appointed as operations director in 2004.
MANAGEMENT
Joined in 1998. Appointed as an associate employee director in Joined in 2004. Appointed as an associate employee director in
2021. He is general manager for the north west England and north 2021. She is pub manager of The Imperial, Exeter.
Wales.
Key
Ⓑ Board Ⓜ Management Ⓐ Audit Ⓝ Nomination Ⓡ Remuneration
member board committee committee committee
The directors are satisfied that the Company has Listing Rule 9.8.4 R
sufficient resources (eg profitability/liquidity) to Information required by this rule to be disclosed
withstand adjustments to the base forecast, as well as (starting on page indicated, if applicable):
the downside scenario.
Details of long-term incentive schemes,
The Company has agreed with its lenders to replace page 70–71
normal financial covenant tests with a minimum liquidity Provision of services by a controlling shareholder
covenant for the period up to and including January page 69–77,
2023, and relaxed leverage covenant tests for the Agreements with controlling shareholders, page 42
second half of the financial year to 30 July 2023. The Corporate governance (DTR 7.2.9 R),
Company is confident that it will be in a position to pages 78–84.
return to normal financial covenant tests thereafter. The
Company has re-financing options available including Future developments
possible extensions on the revolving credit facility. The Company intends to continue to operate pubs and
hotels throughout the UK and Ireland. The Company aims
As a result, the directors have satisfied themselves that to continue to provide customers with good-quality food
and drinks, served by well-trained and friendly staff, at
the Company will continue in operational existence for
reasonable prices.
the foreseeable future. For this reason, the Company
continues to adopt the going-concern basis in
Events after the reporting period
preparing its financial statements. There are no events to disclose.
Financial instruments
By order of the board
The Company’s policy on the use of financial
instruments is set out in note 22.
Consumption (kWh)
2022 2021
Scope 1 226,818,295 134,994,694
Scope 2 205,305,472 178,260,013
Fuel (car) 1,917,037 139,138
Total 434,040,804 313,393,845
Overseas branches
The Company has an overseas branch
in the Republic of Ireland.
The Personnel and Legal Director is retiring on 7 The CEO and the Personnel and Legal Director
October 2022. The Company has promoted the Retail received an additional 4% of their salary, because of
Audit Director to Personnel and Retail Audit Director. their length of service. This additional 4% is available to
His salary was increased by 20% on promotion. all employees with over 30 years’ service with the
Company.
Annual cash bonus
There will be no annual cash bonus awarded to Workforce engagement
executive directors this year. Wider workforce policies and issues, including (but not
exclusively) remuneration, are a standing item on
Deferred bonus scheme board agendas.
The deferred bonus scheme is a scheme which may
award shares to all senior managers throughout the In the current year two employee directors and two
business including executive directors. associate employee directors were appointed. This was
in order that debate and decision making at board level
Given the extraordinary circumstances of the past year, shared the benefit of the “front line” experience that the
the scheme was not due to deliver any award of company ‘s other regular meetings benefit from. This
shares. sharing of experience is vital to preserving the culture
of the company in the future
In recognition of the enormous effort and hard work
since March 2020, and in order to continue to motivate In setting remuneration for the executive board, the
all senior managers throughout the business in their committee takes into account wider workforce
continued focus to rebuild the business, the remuneration policies throughout the Company. Many
Remuneration Committee agreed to award a of the elements of executive board remuneration
discretionary bonus based on 10% increase in owners’ outlined above extend throughout much of the
earnings. At executive board level this will result in an Company, at varying levels
award of 25% of basic salaries in shares.
Debra van Gene
Company share incentive plan (SIP) Chair of the Remuneration Committee
The Company SIP is open to all employees in the 6 October 2022
Company, at varying levels, according to each
individual’s seniority and length of service.
Pension
A new all employee pension scheme has been
introduced, in line with current guidance and applies to
all new employees from 1 August 2022.
Remuneration policy
The committee reviews the executive directors’ remuneration packages at least annually.
The aim of the remuneration policy is to:
Provide attractive and fair remuneration for directors
Align directors’ long-term interests with those of shareholders, employees and the wider community
Incentivise directors to perform to a high level
In agreeing on remuneration, account is taken of the pay levels at Wetherspoon, as well as those in the
hospitality industry in general, along with other comparisons and reports. The committee aims to take a fair and
commonsense approach.
This statement of our remuneration policy was approved by shareholders at the Company’s AGM on 17 December 2020.
The policy is put forward to shareholders’ for approval every three years.
Base salary Provide attractive Salaries are reviewed at least annually, with any changes
and fair normally taking effect from 1 October each year.
remuneration
for directors. Salary increases are awarded at the discretion of the
remuneration committee.
When considering salary levels and whether an increase should be offered, the
committee takes account of a variety of factors, including Company performance,
individual performance, experience and responsibilities, market information and the level
of increase being offered to other employees.
Pension Provide attractive The Company does not operate any defined benefit pension schemes.
and fair
remuneration Newly appointed executive directors will receive a pension contribution of 6% which is
for directors. aligned with that made on average to the wider workforce at the date of this policy. For
the basis of this, please see the table on page 74.
After 25 years’ service, all employees in the Company, including executive directors
receive additional pension payments of 2% of their salary. This rises by a further 2%
after each additional five years’ service.
Executive directors may receive a salary supplement in lieu of pension, at the discretion
of the remuneration committee.
Annual bonus Incentivise Annual bonus payments are paid in cash, at the discretion of the remuneration
plan directors committee.
to perform to a
high level. The bonus is based on profit growth, multiplied by a factor of 1.5 and paid to a maximum
of 45% of salary. Profit growth is calculated on profit before tax, property gains/losses
and exceptional items.
After 25 years’ service, executive directors receive additional SIPs of 5% of their salary.
This rises by a further 5% after each additional five years’ service. The increases which
apply to directors after 25 years and after each additional five years also apply to all
other employees.
Awards under this scheme are not based on financial or other targets.
The Company believes that excessive use of financial targets can lead to distortions in
companies’ behaviour and that it is important for there to be some share awards which
can be accumulated gradually, the value of which depends on the overall success of
the Company. The aim is for all employees to be able to accumulate shares over time,
to encourage loyalty and joint purpose.
If changes are made to SIPs which apply to all employees in the schemes, they may be
applied to executive directors, at the discretion of the remuneration committee.
Deferred Align directors’ The Company does not operate a shareholding scheme with a minimum vesting period
bonus interests with of five years.
scheme those of
shareholders, The deferred bonus scheme may award shares to all senior managers, including
employees and executive directors. Bonus awards are made under the scheme, annually, at the
the wider discretion of the remuneration committee.
community.
Bonus awards are satisfied in shares. One-third of a participant’s shares will vest to the
participant on calculation of the amount of the award, one-third
will vest after one year and the remaining third will vest to the participant after two years
(in each case subject to the participant being employed at the release date).
The current performance criteria are based on earnings per share and owners’
earnings per share. The performance criteria for executive directors are the same as
those for senior managers who are eligible for the scheme. Awards are made using a
multiple based on an employee’s grade. The maximum bonus to be earned under the
scheme is 100% of annual salary.
Any changes made to the deferred bonus scheme for eligible senior managers may, at
the discretion of the remuneration committee, be applied to executive directors.
Non- Provide The fees paid to non-executive directors are determined by the executive board, taking
executive attractive and into account the level of fees for similar positions in the market and the time
directors’ fair commitment which each non-executive director makes.
fees remuneration
for directors. The non-executive directors receive no other remuneration or benefits
from the Company.
To the extent that any executive director holds under Approach to recruitment remuneration
the required number of shares, he or she has a five- The aim, when agreeing on components of
year period to meet this requirement from the date on a remuneration package, including any variable pay
which the requirement was set (17 December 2020). for incoming directors, would be in accordance with
During this period, at least 50% of any vested share the table above.
awards must be retained, until the required
shareholding is attained. Account is taken of the individual’s experience, the
nature of the role being offered and his or her existing
On ceasing to be an executive director, a minimum remuneration package. Relocation expenses or
holding of 50% of the previous requirement must be allowances may be paid, as appropriate.
maintained for a minimum period of 12 months.
The committee may, at its discretion, offer cash, share-
This guideline applies to shares which vest following based elements or additional pension contributions, as
the adoption of this guideline. Any shares purchased by necessary, to secure an appointment, although it does
executives would not be subject to the guideline. not normally do so. Shareholders will be informed of
any such payments at the time of appointment.
The application of the minimum shareholding
requirement is at the discretion of the remuneration Our main principle is that payments made to
committee. prospective directors as compensation for loss of
benefits at a previous Company are inherently unfair,
The current minimum shareholding requirements are since it would be extremely rare for anyone below
200% of base salary, calculated on a £15.71 share board level to receive this sort of compensation.
price at 29 July 2019, this was the share price at the
start of the previous financial year: Chairman and directors’ service contracts
Number of shares The executive directors are employed on rolling
contracts, requiring the Company to give up to one
Minimum Shares held
Requirement as 31 July 2022 year’s notice of termination, while the director may give
six months’ notice.
B Whitley 28,000 25,957
If their appointment is terminated early, non-executive The long-term incentive plan values include:
directors are entitled to the fees to which they would The fixed 25% awarded under the Company’s
have been entitled up to the end of their term. They do share incentive plan
not participate in the Company’s bonus or share An average achieved in respect of the
schemes. Their fees are determined by the executive deferred bonus scheme over the last five years
directors, following consultation with professional
advisers, as appropriate. Payments for loss of office
The Company’s policy is that the period of notice for
Employee directors executive directors will not exceed 12 months;
The employee directors hold their positions, pursuant accordingly, the employment contracts of the executive
to letters of appointment dated 9 December 2021, with directors are terminable on 12 months’ notice by the
a term of three years. Company or six months’ notice by a director.
In the event of gross misconduct, the Company may
External appointments terminate a director’s employment without notice or
Executive directors are not allowed to take external compensation.
appointments without the prior consent of the
Company. The Company has not released any In the event of a director’s departure, the Company’s
executive directors to serve as non-executive director policy on termination payments is as follows:
elsewhere. The Company will seek to ensure that no more
is paid than is warranted in each individual case
Illustration of the application of the Salary payments will be limited to notice periods
remuneration policy There is no entitlement to bonus paid
The charts below set out the composition of the (or associated deferred shares or SIPs) following
chairman and executive directors’ remuneration notice of termination
packages in £000, at a minimum, a reasonable The committee’s normal policy is that, where the
expectation target and as a possible maximum: individual is considered a ‘good leaver’, a prorated
bonus may be paid
Tim Martin
The Company may enable the provision of
Maximum 100% £338 outplacement services to a departing director
Expected 100% £338
Retirement policy
Minimum 100% £338
The Company does not have a mandatory retirement
£0 £100 £200 £300 age. Employees wishing to retire should be aged at
least 55 years at the date of leaving (the minimum age
John Hutson a person can access a workplace pension) and serve
Maximum 42% 15% 43% £1,912 their contractual notice period. Retiring employees are
Expected 64% 4% 32% £1,259 permitted to retain any unvested shares held in any
Minimum 77% 19% £986 Company scheme.
£0 £400 £800 £1,200 £1,600 £2,000
Consideration of employment conditions
elsewhere in the Company
Ben Whitley
The committee receives information on salary
Maximum 40% 15% 45% £734 increases, bonus payments and other benefits
Expected 63% 5% 32% £479 available at the Company. These are taken into
Minimum 76% 21% £371 consideration when conducting the review of executive
£0 £200 £400 £600 £800 remuneration, although no formal consultation with
employees is undertaken in this regard.
Su Cacioppo
Maximum 40% 17% 43% £1,081 Consideration of shareholders’ views
Expected 63% 5% 32% £714 Any views in respect of directors’ remuneration
Minimum 78% 19% £561 expressed to the Company by shareholders have been,
and will be, taken into account in the formulation of the
£0 £300 £600 £900 £1,200
Fixed Annual variable Long-term incentive directors’ remuneration policy.
The fixed annual values include: Details of votes cast for and against the resolution to
Fixed annual salary, benefits and allowances, in line approve last year’s remuneration report and any
with those outlined in the policy section, and based on matters discussed with shareholders during the year
the salaries applicable as at 31 July 2022 are provided in the annual report on remuneration.
Executive
directors
John Hutson 638 638 – (51) 54 33 – – 223 96 102 97 1,017 813 794 717 223 96
Su Cacioppo 358 358 – (6) 38 24 – – 125 54 57 51 578 481 453 427 125 54
Ben Whitley 250 250 – (4) 29 20 – – 62 31 30 30 371 327 309 296 62 31
James Ullman 45 – – – 9 – – – – – 6 – 60 – 60 – – –
1,291 1,246 – (61) 130 77 – – 410 181 195 178 2,026 1,621 1,616 1,440 410 181
Chairman, non-
executive
directors and
employee
directors
Tim Martin 324 324 – (51) 13 14 – – – – – – 337 287 337 287 – –
Ben Thorne 54 32 – (7) – – – – – – – – 54 25 54 25 – –
Debra van Gene 54 54 – (9) – – – – – – – – 54 45 54 45 – –
Richard Beckett 54 54 – (9) – – – – – – – – 54 45 54 45 – –
Harry Morley 54 54 – (9) – – – – – – – – 54 45 54 45 – –
Hudson Simmons 5 – – – – – – – – – – – 5 – 5 – – –
Deborah
5 – – – – – – – – – – – 5 – 5 – – –
Whittingham
Total 1,841 1,764 – (146) 143 91 – – 410 181 195 178 2,589 2,068 2,179 1,887 410 181
1) Taxable benefits include car allowances and the provision of rail travel for Tim Martin, as well as
private health and fuel expenses for executive directors. In respect of the element for pub calls made to monitor
standards, 5% was awarded, in line with policy.
2) No bonus was awarded under the profit growth element of the bonus scheme, in line with policy. This bonus is only
awarded to the executive directors and not the employee directors, Hudson Simmons and Deborah Whittingham.
3) Existing executive directors receive either pension contributions, equivalent to 12% of salary, to the stakeholder
pension plan or salary in lieu of pension contributions. Additional pension payments are made, equivalent to 2% of
salary for 25–29 years’ service, a further 2% for 30–34 years’ service and a further 2% at 35+ years’ service. Su
Cacioppo, John Hutson and Ben Whitley took, in salary, the portion of their Company pension contribution which was
above the annual cap. For newly appointed executive directors they receive pension contributions at 6% which aligns
with contributions of the wider workforce.
4) The amount in the table under long-term incentives, includes the monetary value of the share awards which have
taken place during the period for both SIP and RSP payments which took place during October 2021 and March 2022.
The above table is on a cash basis and does not include the monetary value for the share awards that will take place in
October 2022. These have been accrued within note 5.
5) Ben Thorne was appointed a non-executive director on 17 December 2020. In FY21, Ben Thorne’s remuneration is
shown from the date of his appointment.
6) Deborah Whittingham and Hudson Simmons were appointed as employee directors on 20 December 2021. In
addition to the employee director’s fees above, both received earnings from the Company as an employee.
7) James Ullman was appointed personnel and retail audit director on 4 May 2022. James Ullman’s remuneration is
shown from the date of his appointment. He has not been included in the long-term Incentive award table on page 75
owing to these awards taking place prior to 4 May 2022.
The final amount received by executive directors for long-term incentive awards will be affected by future changes in the
Company’s share price. A 50% increase in the share price between the award date and the vesting date would increase
the value of the award by 50%. Conversely, a 50% reduction would reduce the value of the award by 50%.
Details of targets applicable during the year are disclosed in the directors’ remuneration policy statement.
The resultant percentages against each of the bonus measures achieved are shown below, with the percentage
awarded for each director being the same.
*J Hutson and S Cacioppo receive an additional 10%, as they have completed 30 years’ service with the Company.
James Ullman was appointed personnel and retail audit director on 4 May 2022. James Ullman’s bonus measures are
shown from the date of his appointment.
*Awarded at an average share price of £10.90, three days before grant; shares will vest three years after grant.
**Calculated at an estimated share price of £4.05, which is the share price five days before grant date. The actual award
will be determined by using the share price five days after the grant date.The grant date will be 7 October 2022. These
shares vest in three equal tranches in each of 2022, 2023 and 2024.
All awards have no further performance conditions attached, except to be employed by the Company at the vesting date.
With the exception of partnership shares, there have been no changes to these interests since 31 July 2022.
Partnership shares
Su Cacioppo and Ben Whitley are participants of the partnership share scheme and acquired 218 shares each in the
year. John Hutson is a participant in the partnership share scheme and acquired 217 shares in the year. Deborah
Whittingham was also a participant of the partnership share scheme and acquired 141 shares in the year. The market
price of the shares purchased ranged 567.0–1,155.0p.
Partnership shares are shares which can be purchased by individuals who work in the Company for a duration of time.
Participants can elect to purchase these shares which come out each employee’s payroll.
Growth in the value of a hypothetical £100 holding since July 2008, based on 30-trading-day average values
700.0
Value of hypothetical £100 holding (£)
620.0
540.0
460.0
380.0
300.0
220.0
140.0
60.0
Jul-08 Jul-09 Jul-10 Jul-11 Jul-12 Jul-13 Jul-14 Jul-15 Jul-16 Jul-17 Jul-18 Jul-19 Jul-20 Jul-21 Jul-22
JD Wetherspoon
Chief executive officer’s remuneration It is believed that using a consistent methodology with
that of gender pay reporting will produce the most
Long-term understandable ratios.
Performance
incentives
bonus
scheme
Single figure payment There has been no comparison between dividends and
shares
of total achieved
vesting
remuneration against
against
share buy-backs this year, as there has been no such
maximum
possible
maximum events in the current and previous financial year.
possible*
The Company has used the same data used for gender By order of the board
pay reporting to determine the median, 25th and 75th
percentile employees. This method is called option B in Nigel Connor
The Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulation Company Secretary
2018. 6 October 2022
Board leadership and Company purpose Matters reserved for the board
The board of directors The following matters are reserved for the board:
The board comprises the following members:
Tim Martin, chairman Board and management
Structure and senior
John Hutson, chief executive officer
management responsibilities
Ben Whitley, finance director Nomination of directors
Su Cacioppo, personnel and legal director Appointment and removal of
James Ullman, personnel and retail auditor director chairman and company secretary
Debra van Gene, non-executive director
Sir Richard Beckett, non-executive director Strategic matters
Harry Morley, non-executive director Strategic, financing or adoption of
new business plans, in respect of any
Ben Thorne, non-executive and senior independent
material aspect of the Company
director
Deborah Whittingham, employee director Business control
Hudson Simmons, employee director Agreement of code of ethics
and business practice
Will Fotheringham and Emma Gibson attend board Internal audit
meetings in their capacity as associate employee Authority limits for heads of department
directors.
Operating budgets
The board considers each of Debra van Gene, Sir Approval of a budget for investments
Richard Beckett, Ben Thorne and Harry Morley to be and capital projects
independent. Changes in major supply contracts
Finance
Biographies of all non-executive and executive
Raising new capital and confirmation
directors are provided on page 65 and can be viewed of major facilities
on the Company’s website: jdwetherspoon.com The entry into asset-financing transactions
Specific risk-management policies, including
The chairman regularly meets the non-executive insurance, hedging and borrowing limits
directors and evaluates the performance of the board, Final approval of annual and interim accounts
and accounting policies
its committees and its individual directors.
Appointment of external auditors
The Company’s purpose and how it establishes Legal matters
its values and culture through engagement with Institution of legal proceedings,
employees are disclosed on page 51. where costs exceed certain values
Meeting and talking with employees from our Reviewing whistleblowing reports and
pubs during pub visits, regional meetings and at outcomes via the audit committee
head office weekly meetings
Attendance of area managers at the opening Division of responsibilities
section of the board meetings to discuss issues
relating to the operation of their pubs and the
It is not advantageous, in a company like Wetherspoon,
Company generally
Reviewing the outcome of weekly discussion for there to be high barriers or exaggerated distinctions
meetings of selected pub and area managers between the role of chairman and that of chief
led by senior Company employees executive officer. However, some general distinctions
are outlined overleaf.
The chairman is responsible for the smooth running The chief executive officer is responsible for the
of the board and ensuring that all directors are smooth daily running of the business
fully informed of matters relevant to their roles
Delegated responsibility of authority from the Developing and maintaining effective management controls,
Company to exchange contracts for new pubs and to sign planning and performance measurements
all contracts with suppliers
Providing support, advice and feedback to the Maintaining and developing an effective
chief executive officer organisational structure
Supporting the Company’s strategy and encouraging the External and internal communications, in conjunction
chief executive officer with that strategy’s development. with the chairman, on any issues facing the Company
Management of the chief executive officer’s contract, Timely and accurate reporting of the above to the board
appraisal and remuneration, by way of making
recommendations to the remuneration committee
Providing support to executive directors and Recruiting and managing senior managers in the business
senior managers of the Company
Helping to provide the ‘ethos’ and ‘vision’ of the Company, Developing and maintaining effective risk-management
after discussions and debates with employees of all levels, and regulatory controls
customers, shareholders and including organisations
such as CAMRA
Helping to provide information on customers and Maintaining primary relationships with shareholders
employees’ views by calling on pubs and investors
Helping to make directors aware of shareholders’ concerns Chairing the management board responsible for
implementing the Company’s strategy
The board has several established committees as set out below. The board met eight times during the
year ending 31 July 2022. Attendance of the directors,non-executives, employee and associate employee directors
where appropriate, is shown below.
Audit, risk and internal control Reviews and monitors procedures in relation to the
Company’s whistleblowing policy
Audit committee Reviews and questions the effectiveness of
The committee’s primary role is to assist the board all risk-management and internal control systems
in the provision of effective governance over the Reviews the retail audit director’s statement on
Company’s financial reporting, risk management and internal controls on completed audits
internal control; in particular, it performs the Considers the overall impact on the business of the
following activities: matters arisen from the various reviews described
above and any other matters which the auditors,
Assumes direct responsibility for the appointment,
internal or external, may bring to the attention
compensation, resignation and dismissal of the
of the committee
external auditors, including review of the external audit,
Ensures that all matters, where appropriate, are
its cost and effectiveness
raised and brought to the attention of the board
Reviews the independence of the external auditors,
including consideration of the level of non-audit work Significant financial reporting items
carried out by them The accounting policies of the Company and the
Reviews the scope and nature of the work estimates and judgements made by management are
to be performed by the external auditors, assessed by the committee for their suitability. The
before audit commences following areas are those considered by the committee,
Reviews the half-year and annual to be the most significant:
financial statements The provision for the impairment of fixed assets –
Ensures compliance with accounting standards and several judgements are used in making this calculation,
monitors the integrity of the financial statements and primarily on expected future sales and profits. The
formal announcements relating to the financial committee received reports and questioned
performance of the Company and supports the board in management on the calculations made and the
its responsibility to ensure that the annual financial assumptions used
statements are fair, balanced and understandable Significant one-off items of expense or income
Reviews the internal audit plan, which is updated to are reported as exceptional on the face of the income
reflect the changing needs of the business and the statement. All exceptional items are reviewed by
concerns of management and the audit committee the committee
Reviews and raises questions on all internal audit The ongoing application of IFRS 16 – Lease to the
reports and requests management to adjust the Company’s lease portfolio, including the accounting for
prioritisation of mitigating actions, as needed. Areas lease modifications and the application of the COVID-
reviewed this year included supply chain and 19 related rent concession practical expedient along
distribution centre, pub closures, system security, IT, with the presentation and disclosure of leases.
cyber-crime, changes in business environment, decline The committee reviewed the financial plans,
in like-for-like sales volume and escalating costs of modelled scenarios and assumptions made by the
labour Company in support of the presentation of the financial
Reviews, with the support of specialists as required, statements on a going concern basis
controls over access to the IT systems used around the The committee reviewed and raised questions
business and agrees with management on the timing of on the calculations made by the Company in relation to
any mitigating actions to be carried out
the hedge accounting and effectiveness for interest- The internal audit department, in conjunction with
rate swaps feedback from senior management of the business
functions, produces a risk register annually.
The committee is satisfied that the judgements made
by management are reasonable and that appropriate The identified risks are assessed, based on the
disclosures have been included in the accounts. likelihood of a risk occurring and the potential impact
to the business, should the risk materialise.
Non-audit services
During the year, the Company made no use of The retail audit director determines and reviews the
specialist teams from Grant Thornton UK LLP, relating risk-assessment process and will communicate the
to accounting or tax services. The fees paid to Grant timetable annually.
Thornton UK LLP for non-audit services were £55,000 The risk register is presented to the audit committee
(2021: £33,000), relating to interim review procedures. and management board annually, with a schedule of
The use of Grant Thornton UK LLP for non-audit work audit work agreed on, on a rolling basis. The purpose
is monitored regularly, to achieve the necessary of this work is to review, on behalf of the Company and
independence and objectivity of the auditors. Where the board, those key risks and the systems of control
the auditors provide non-audit services, their objectivity necessary to manage such risks.
and independence are safeguarded by the use of
different teams. See note 2 on page 15, for a Where recommendations are made for changes in
breakdown of the auditor’s remuneration for audit and systems or processes to reduce risk, internal audit will
non-audit services. follow up regularly to ensure that the recommendations
are implemented.
External auditors
No significant failings of internal control were identified
The audit committee is responsible for making
during these reviews.
recommendations to appoint, reappoint or remove
external auditors. Following a review by the audit A summary of the financial risks and treasury policies
committee, the board agreed to recommend the can be found on pages 52-53, together with other risks
reappointment of Grant Thornton UK LLP as external and uncertainties.
auditors at the AGM in November 2022.
Emerging risks
Audit-tendering and rotation The Company monitors emerging risks through the
The audit committee keeps under review the regulatory receipt of advice and feedback from head office and
requirements on audit-tendering and rotation. pub staff, customers, suppliers, and several external
The Company will be required to change its audit firm advisers and by maintaining an awareness of the wider
for the year ending 25 July 2038, at the latest. The economic, political and social environment.
audit was last tendered in 2018 – and Grant Thornton
Any potential risks identified will be discussed in the
UK LLP has been in place as the Company’s auditor
relevant internal meetings, where any potential impact
for five years.
on the business will be considered. Any significant
The disclosures provided within this report constitute risks identified will be added to the Company’s risk
the Company’s statement of compliance with the register.
requirement of the statutory audit services for large
Internal control
companies market investigation (Mandatory use of
During the year, the Company provided an internal
competitive tender processes and audit committee
audit and risk-management function. The creation of
responsibilities) order 2014.
a system of internal control and risk mitigation is a key
Effectiveness of external auditors part of the Company’s operations and culture. The
The audit committee assesses the ongoing board is responsible for maintaining a sound system
effectiveness of the external auditors and audit of internal control and reviewing its effectiveness.
process, on the basis of meetings and internal The function can only manage, rather than entirely
reviews with finance and other senior executives. eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve business
objectives. It can provide only reasonable, and not
In reviewing the independence of the external auditors,
absolute, assurance against material misstatement or
the audit committee considers several factors. These
loss. Ongoing reviews, assessments and management
include the standing, experience and tenure of the
of significant risks took place throughout the year
external auditors, the nature and level of services
under review and up to the date of the approval of the
provided and confirmation from the external auditors
annual report.
that they have complied with relevant UK
independence standards. The terms of reference The Company has an internal audit function
of the audit committee are available on the which is discharged as follows:
Company’s website. Regular audits of the Company’s stock
Unannounced visits to pub sites
Risk management
Monitoring systems which control the Company’s
The board is responsible for the Company’s
cash
risk-management process.
Health and safety visits, ensuring compliance
with Company procedures
Reviewing and assessing the impact of
legislative and regulatory change Companywide scheme. However, during the current
Risk-management process, identifying key risks year no such award was given based on such targets.
facing the business
The Company has key controls, as follows: Awards made are predictable and within a range
Authority limits and controls over cash-handling, of values. The remuneration committee can apply
purchasing commitments and capital expenditure discretion in the application of awards.
A budgeting process, with a detailed 12-month
The terms of reference of the remuneration committee
operating plan and a mid-term financial plan,
are available on the Company’s website.
both approved by the board
Business results reported weekly, with a report Nomination committee
compared with budget and the previous year The committee meets at least annually and:
Forecasts prepared regularly throughout the year, reviews the board structure, size, diversity (including
for review by the board gender), composition and successional needs, keeping
Complex treasury instruments are not used. The under review the balance of membership between
Company, from time to time, as stated in this report executive and non-executive and the required blend
and accounts, enters into swap arrangements which fix of skills, experience, knowledge and independence
interest rates at certain levels for a number of years on the board.
and enters into supply arrangements with fixed prices formally proposes any new executive or non-
for electricity and gas, for example, which run for executive directors for the approval of the whole
between one and three years board, following a reasonable process for such
An annual review of the amount of external an appointment. This includes a review of skill set,
insurance which it obtains, bearing in mind the industry knowledge and experience to meet the
availability of such cover, its costs and the likelihood of strategic needs of the business.
the risks involved reviews the leadership and successional needs of
Regular evaluation of processes and controls, the organisation, with a view to ensuring the long-term
in relation to the Company’s financial success of the Company.
reporting requirements ensures that all directors offer themselves for
annual re-election by shareholders.
The directors confirm that they have reviewed the
effectiveness of the system of internal control. No director is involved in any decision about his or her
own reappointment. In carrying out these activities,
Remuneration and nomination the non-executive directors follow the guidelines of the
Chartered Governance Institute and comply with the
Remuneration committee
code.
The committee is responsible for determining the
remuneration received by executive directors and The terms of reference of the nomination committee
senior managers. When setting levels of remuneration, are available on the Company’s website.
the committee seeks to ensure that they are sufficient
to attract and retain people with the necessary skills In December 2021, the Company appointed two
and experience. The committee seeks to ensure that employee directors to the full board of the Company
remuneration is not excessive and is in line with and two associate employee directors who attend
amounts paid by comparable companies. In setting board meetings. On 4 May 2022, the Company
executive directors’ remuneration, the committee takes announced the retirement of Su Cacioppo and the
into account wider workforce remuneration policies appointment of James Ullman to the board. Sir Richard
throughout the Company, with many elements Beckett will retire as a non-executive director after the
extending throughout much of the Company at varying Company’s AGM on 17 November 2022 at which he
levels according to seniority and length of service. will not seek re-election. No other board changes have
been made.
The remuneration policy operated as intended during
the year – no changes were made and normally no Employment policies
discretion is applied. However, during the current year, Staff are encouraged to make a commitment to the
discretion was applied in respect of the deferred bonus Company’s success and to progress to more senior
percentage which was awarded to all participants. roles as they develop.
The directors’ report on remuneration is set out on In selecting, training and promoting staff, the Company
pages 69–77. has to take account of the physically demanding nature
of much of its work. The Company is committed
Directors’ remuneration is clearly presented in the to equality of opportunity and to the elimination of
accounts. The remuneration policy is clearly stated, discrimination in employment.
with the calculation of performance measures
explained. The remuneration policy does not rely overly The Company aims to create and maintain a working
on target-based incentives, with share awards normally environment, terms and conditions of employment and
given based on profits, earnings per share and owners’ personnel and management practices which ensure
earnings growth, as well as some shares awarded that no individual receives less favourable treatment
without performance targets as part of a on the grounds of his or her race, religion or belief,
nationality, ethnic origin, age, disability, gender
The Company has also established the following Approved by order of the board
network groups to foster discussion and generate ideas
Nigel Connor
about these issues:
Company Secretary
LGBTQIA+
6 October 2022
Women
Substantial shareholdings
The Company has been notified of the following substantial holdings in its share capital at 31 July 2022:
Number of % of share
ordinary shares capital
Source: Investec Bank plc. This schedule shows the consolidated shareholdings of individuals and companies,
whereas the first table shows shareholdings by individual holding.
*This represents shares which have been purchased by the Company for the benefit of employees under the SIP.
Please see pages 70–71. This includes vested shares held by employees.
Share prices
25 July 2021 1,124p
Low 516p
High 1,180p
31 July 2022 557p
Shareholders’ enquiries
If you have a query about your shareholding, please contact the Company’s registrars directly:
Computershare Investor Services plc: uk.computershare.com/investor
0370 707 1091
Annual report
Paper copies of this annual report are available from the company secretary, at the registered office.
E-mail: [email protected]
The Raymond Mays 44–48 North Street Bourne PE10 9AB England
The Running Horses (Lloyds) Water Street/ Chalon Way St Helens WA10 1PY England
The Pear Tree 25–27 Alcester Road South Birmingham B14 7JQ England
The Drum 557–559 Lea Bridge Road Leyton E10 7EQ England
The Three Tun Tavern 1–5 Temple Road, Carysford Avenue Dublin A94 Y5F1 Ireland
The Milan Bar 14–32 High Street Croydon CR0 1YA England
The Oyster Rooms Unit 3, Fulham Broadway Centre Fulham SW6 1AA England
The Looking Glass 41–43 Buttermarket Street Warrington WA1 2LY England
The London Bar South Terminal, Airside, Gatwick Airport Crawley RH6 0NN England
The Robert Peel 5–10 Market Place Bury BL9 0LD England
Registered office
Wetherspoon House
Central Park
Reeds Crescent
Watford
WD24 4QL
Company number
1709784
Registrars
Computershare Investor Services plc
PO Box 82
The Pavilions
Bridgwater Road
Bristol
BS99 6ZY
Independent auditors
Grant Thornton UK LLP
Chartered Accountants and
Statutory Auditors
30 Finsbury Square
London
EC2A 1AG
Solicitors
Macfarlanes LLP
20 Cursitor Street
London
EC4A 1LT
Bankers
Allied Irish Banks
Banco de Sabadell S.A London Branch
Barclays Bank plc
BNP Paribas
Clydesdale Bank plc
Co Operative Rabbobank U.A
Crédit Industriel et Commercial.
Handelsbanken Bank
HSBC Bank plc
Mediobanca S.p.A
MUFG Bank Ltd
National Westminster Bank plc
Santander UK plc
The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland
Financial advisers
Investec Bank plc
Rushe Advisors
Stockbrokers
Investec Bank plc
J D Wetherspoon plc
Wetherspoon House, Central Park
Reeds Crescent, Watford, WD24 4QL
01923 477777
jdwetherspoon.com