Lesson 2 Task
Lesson 2 Task
Math Ed 801
Based on the class discussions, readings, and your own experiences, prepare a critical
review of the K to 12 Program.
A Critical Review of the K to 12 Mathematics Program
A. Strengths
The K to 12 Mathematics Program emphasizes problem-solving and critical-thinking
skills, incorporation of real-world applications and technology, and hands-on learning. It aims to
broaden students' learning programs, improve access to quality education, develop individuals
who can contribute to the larger community, and increase the Filipino workforce's global
competitiveness. Adding two years to the current 10-year basic education cycle is necessary to
bring the country's public education system up to international standards.
Language proficiency is built into the K to 12 curriculum (MTB-MLE). Students learn best
in their first language, which is their mother tongue (MT). Both UNESCO and UNICEF advocate
for the use of mother tongue in schools so that students do not feel isolated.
The Spiral Curriculum (Spiral Curriculum) is a continuous progression of topics across
grade levels to ensure that knowledge and skills are mastered at the end of each level. It
involves spreading out learning over time rather than concentrating it in shorter periods. It
emphasizes age-appropriate learning, reinforcement, and integration with other parts of the
curriculum. At the curriculum design stage, attention is paid to the topic's logical sequence and
holistic understanding of the topic. Elementary Algebra was taught in the first year of BEC,
Intermediate Algebra in the second year, Geometry in the third year, and Advanced Algebra,
Statistics, and Probability in the fourth year. The spiral curriculum emphasizes the process of
reinforcement in learning (Ireland & Mouthaan, 2020).
B. Weaknesses
Anakbayan, a youth group, has criticized the K to 12 program as a "flawed,
problematic framework" that will only worsen the education crisis and subject workers to
exploitation. Vencer Crisostomo, Anakbayan's national chairperson, argued that the
program is not a solution to education and employment woes, but instead will
exacerbate and deepen the problems.
Competencies are added rather than subtracted in the K to 12 Mathematics
curriculum. The curriculum is not as decongested as the curriculum claimed. Teachers
dislike spiral progression because it requires them to know everything and constantly
learn new things. It was also raised during our discussion whether the mathematics
curriculum is truly spiral, as it does not appear to be from grade 7 to grade 10. This is
because some topics, such as Algebra, necessitate more skills. The spiral approach
brings inadequate opportunities to cover a wide range of topics in a single year, a prior
knowledge requirement, a diluted sense of continuity and fragmented comprehension,
and a limited emphasis on lower-level concepts. Topics are treated superficially and
students may fail to master important concepts due to unnecessary content repetition.
Topics are introduced at an inappropriate rate and academic learning time is minimized
due to the rate at which new content is introduced.
Teachers are inadequately to teach the MTB-MLE subject. Because the
Philippines has so many mother tongues, it is not uncommon for students' mother
tongues to differ from teachers' mother tongues. Preparation, textbooks, and other
educational materials are also in short supply. Furthermore, MTB-MLE does not align
English competencies. MTB-MLE is opposed in Manila because it duplicates a Filipino
subject. Moreover, MTB-MLE suffers from poor financial management.
References:
Adarlo, G., & Jackson, L. (2016). For whom is K-12 education: A critical look into twenty-first
century educational policy and curriculum in the Philippines. In Educating for the 21st
century: Perspectives, policies and practices from around the world (pp. 207-223).
Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Apolonio, A. L. (2022). Mother tongue-based multilingual education (MTB-MLE) in the
Philippines: Its implications to language learning. Erudio Journal of Educational
Innovation, 9(1), 1-12.
Barrot, J. S. (2021). K to 12 curriculum reform in the Philippines: Towards making students
future ready. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1-15.
Calderon, M. T. F. (2015). A critique of K-12 Philippine education system. Arellano University
Graduate School Journal, 12(1), 1-1.
Dagalea, A. J. L., Peralta, S. B., & Abocejo, F. T. (2022). Evaluation of the Mother Tongue-
Based Multilingual Education Program in the Philippines. Budapest International
Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 5(4), 422-431.
Lacanilao, F. (2012). A critique of some commentaries on the Philippine K-12 program.
https://www.philippinesbasiceducation.us/2012/04/critique-of-some-commentaries-
on.html
OECD, (2019). Countries must make teaching profession more financially and intellectually
attractive. https://www.oecd.org/newsroom/countries-must-make-teaching-profession-
more-financially-and-intellectually-attractive.htm
Scoular, C. (2020). Analysis of 21st century skills integration as applied in the Philippines K to
12 program. Final report.