Physical Pendulum
Physical Pendulum
Marking Scheme
No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
i
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
ABSTRACT
This experiment's objective was to calculate the mass moment of inertia at the center of gravity
(IG) and the suspension points (IO) through oscillation. The experiment results indicate
inconsistencies between experimental and theoretical values for IG and Io. The experiment
revealed that the values of IG and IO at both sites are significantly different, even though the
mass of the wooden pendulum is the same. The experiment involved determining the time for
ten oscillations with independent supports on each side, one on each side (left and right). The
average time for 10 oscillations is calculated by multiplying the time spent on each side by
four. Environmental conditions and mechanical error may have influenced the results.
ii
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 THEORY 2
4.0 RESULTS 5
5.0 DISCUSSION 8
6.0 CONCLUSION 12
7.0 REFERENCE 14
8.0 APPENDIX 15
iii
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
LIST OF TABLES
iv
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
LIST OF FIGURES
v
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The definition of mass moment of inertia is resistance to rotational motion. The body's
mass distribution and the axis of choice with bigger moments demand different amounts of
torque to alter the body's rotational speed.
Both rotational kinetics and linear kinetics are characterised by a body's resistance to
changes in motion, and moment of inertia plays a part in both.The application of moment of
inertia is demonstrated by a figure skater who uses conservation of momentum to spin faster by
pulling in their arms and reducing their moment of inertia.This experiment's goal is to use
oscillation to calculate the mass moment of inertia at the suspension point (Io) and the centre of
gravity (Ig).
Moments of inertia can theoretically be calculated using a formula based on their shape.
Ig=mr2 is the moment of inertia for a pendulum at the centre of gravity, where m is mass and r
is a vector from the force to the rotational axis that is perpendicular to it. The parallel axis
theorem is used to find the mass moment of inertia at the suspension point, or Io. Io = Ig+md2
is the parallel axis theorem, where d is the length of time between the part's centre and the
profile's center.
The mass moment of inertia can be calculated using a formula using an experimental
technique. This experiment involves oscillating a wooden pendulum at a specific angle. T =
2π 𝐼𝑂𝑚𝑔𝐺. Due of its unfettered rotation, this pendulum is a physical pendulum.
Period, t, is the amount of time it takes the pendulum to complete ten full oscillations.
To determine the experimental value of the mass moment of inertia, the time, t, is entered into
the formula. After that, the percentage error is computed by comparing the theoretical and
experimental values.
1
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
2.0 THEORY
A basic pendulum consists of a heavy item hung from a fixed support. When a pendulum is
freed from its equilibrium position, it swings forth and backward with a consistent amplitude.
Periodic motion refers to regular, repeated motion. Pendulum motion analysis reveals dynamic
changes in many values throughout time. Changes also occur. Several forces can be
represented by numbers such as velocity, potential energy, and kinetic energy.
I Is a moment of inertia, also referred to as the angular mass or rotational inertia of a pendulum
about its rotation axis. g is the acceleration of gravitational force. While m denotes the
pendulum's total mass and r denotes the distance from the rotation. Additionally, the parallel
axis theorem formula is used to calculate moment inertia.
In this case, a rigid body is turned to oscillate rather than a point mass, as seen in the image.
There are no string requirements. As a result, there is no suspense in this case. A compound
pendulum operates similarly to a single pendulum, with two key differences.
Gravity works on the rigid body's centre of mass. The length of the pendulum utilised in the
equation equals the linear distance between the pivot and the mass centre ("h"). The rigid
body's moment of inertia about a point suspension is not equal to "𝑚𝐿 " as it is in the case of a
simple pendulum. Thus, the time of a compound pendulum is given by:
𝑇=2𝜋√𝐼mgh
2
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Using this formula, we can compute the time of the physical pendulum for a rigid body with
known MI. Consider this image of a uniform stiff rod pivoting from a frame. The centre of
mass is positioned "L/2" from the suspension point.
Both the cylinder and diamond shape metal pins are assumed to be frictionless, moment of
inertia of the rigid rod about its centre is:
𝐼𝐶= 𝑚𝐿212
However, we must calculate the rod's moment of inertia around the point of suspension,
denoted as "O". Applying the parallel axes theorem,
It's important to remember that the stiff body's mass doesn't affect the time. However, the rigid
body's mass distribution affects the time. Changing the rigid body's form, size, or mass
distribution affects its MI at the point of suspension. This changes the time. A real pendulum
can effectively measure "g." This gadget is commonly used globally for gravity surveys. To
calculate the value of "g," simply provide the time or frequency.
Think of the physical pendulum as a basic pendulum. To do this, we can imagine the rigid
body's mass as concentrated at a single point, like a basic pendulum, where the time periods are
identical. Assume a linear distance of "Lo" from the suspension point.
3
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Apparatus
1. Stopwatch
2. Protractor
3. Steel ruler
4. Frame
5. Supports (Diamond support / Rod support)
6. Wooden pendulum
Procedure
1. The thickness of wooden pendulum, length from point A (diamond support) until point
B (end of hollow part), diameter or circular part, length and width of hollow part are
measured using the steel ruler.
2. The wooden pendulum is suspended from the one end on the frame which is by using
the diamond support (point A).
3. The wooden pendulum at 10 degrees is angled by looking at the protractor to the left as
the starting position.
4. The wooden pendulum is released and the stopwatch is started alongside with the time
taken for 10 complete oscillations is measured.
5. Step 3 and 4 are repeated to tilting the pendulum to the right.
6. Each side is repeated four times with the time taken for each set is recorded for 10
oscillations.
7. The same steps are repeated when the wooden pendulum is suspended on the rod
support (point B).
8. The average time taken for 10 oscillations is calculated at each suspension point.
4
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
4.0 RESULT
Experimental Calculation
tavg =
∑t
4
14.19+14.3+13.46+14.35
tavg =
4
tavg = 14.08 s
Point 2;
14.34+14.47+13.47 +14.19
tavg =
4
tavg = 14.12 s
13.41+ 14.35+13.3+13.16
tavg =
4
tavg = 13.56 s
Point 2;
13.41+ 14.84+13.47+13.78
Point 2; tavg =
4
tavg = 13.88 s
5
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
t avg
T=
number of oscillations
14.08
T=
10
T=1.41 s
Point 2;
14.12
T=
10
T=1.41 s
13.56
T=
10
T=1.36 s
Point 2;
13.88
T=
10
T=1.39 s
3) Length, L
Point 1;
1.41=2 π
LA1 = 0.49 m
√ L
9.81
Point 2;
1.41=2 π
LA2 = 0.49 m
√ L
9.81
Point 2;
1.39=2 π
LB2 = 0.48 m
√ L
9.81
6
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
x (LB −x)
rA=
L A + LB −2 x
x=70.2 cm
x=0.7 m
From suspension point A
Point 1;
0.7 ( 0.46−0.7 )
rA1=
0.49+0.46−2 ( 0.7 )
rA=0.37 m
Point 2;
0.7 ( 0.48−0.7 )
rA2=
0.49+0.46−2 ( 0.7 )
rA=0.36 m
rB= x - rA
Point 1;
rB1=0.7-0.37
rA=0.33 m
Point 2;
rB2=0.7-0.36
rA=0.34 m
5) Mass moment of inertia, Io
Point 1;
1.41=2 π
√ Io
( 0.6)(9.81)(0.37)
Io= 1.097 × 10-1 kgm2
Point 2;
7
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
1.41=2 π
√ Io
( 0.6)(9.81)(0.36)
Io= 1.067 × 10-1 kgm2
1.36=2 π
√ Io
(0.6)(9.81)(0.33)
Io= 9.1 × 10-2 kgm2
Point 2;
1.39=2 π
√ Io
(0.6)(9.81)(0.34)
Io= 9.794 × 10-2 kgm2
IG=mrG(L-rG)
From suspension point A
Point 1;
IG=(0.6)(0.37)(0.49-0.37)
IG=2.664×10-2 kgm2
Point 2;
IG=(0.6)(0.36)(0.49-0.36)
IG=2.808×10-2 kgm2
From suspension point B
Point 1;
IG=(0.6)(0.33)(0.46-0.33)
IG=2.664×10-2 kgm2
Point 2;
IG=(0.6)(0.33)(0.48-0.33)
IG=2.97×10-2 kgm2
8
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Theoretical Calculation
0.025 m
0.45 m
0.8 m
y=
∑yA
∑A
−1
y A =3.852× 10 m
9
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
y=
∑yA
∑A
−1
y B =3.44 ×10 m
m pendulum
ρ pendulum=
V total
600 ÷ 1000
ρ pendulum= −4
5.86 ×10
3
ρ pendulum=1024.61 kg /m
10
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
2 m2
1024.61= −5
4.95 ×10
m2= 0.051
3 m3
1024.61= −6
4.91 ×10
m1= 0.005
Componen I (kgm2)
t
2 2
1 0.66(0.8 + 0.08 )
I=
12
−2
I =3.56 ×10
2 2
2 0.051(0.45 +0.011 )
I=
12
−4
I =8.61 ×10
3 I =(0.005)¿ ¿
−7
I =3.91 ×10
11
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
−1 2
I OA=2.26 × 10 kg m
−1 2
I OB=1.81 ×10 kg m
12
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
I GA 1.37 ×10
−1
2.664×10-2 2.808×10-2 33.6 28.5
I OB 1.81 ×10
−1
9.1 × 10-2 9.794×10-2 85.3 84.5
I GB 1.1 ×10
−1
2.664×10-2 2.97×10-2 76.6 73
13
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Experiment Calculation
Wooden pendulum mass = 0.6 kg
Gravity, g = 9.81 m/s2
Distance from point A to B, x = 0.702 m
Distance from point B to A, x = 0.723 m
t avg
t=
No. of Oscillation
Suspension Point A
Point 1 Point 2
14.08 14.12
t= t=
10 10
t=1.408 t=1.412
Suspension Point B
Point 1 Point 2
13.56 13.88
t= t=
10 10
14
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
t=1.356 t=1.388
2. Length, L
t=2 π
√ L
g
Suspension Point A
Point 1 Point 2
1.408=2 π
√
L A 1=0.493 m
LA1
9.81
1.412=2 π
√
L A 2=0.495 m
LA 2
9.81
Suspension Point B
Point 1 Point 2
1.356=2 π
√
LB 1=0.457 m
LB1
9.81
1.388=2 π
√
LB 2 =0.479 m
LB 2
9.81
3. Value of radius, r
x (LB− x)
r A=
LA + LB −2 x
Suspension Point A
Point 1 Point 2
0.702(0.457−0.702) 0.702(0.479−0.702)
r A 1= r A 2=
0.493+ 0.457−2(0.702) 0.495+0.479−2 (0.702)
r A 1=0.379 m r A 2=0.364 m
15
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
r B=x−r A
Suspension Point B
Point 1 Point 2
r B 1=0.723−0.379 r B 2=0.723−0.364
r B 1=0.344 m r B 2=0.359 m
t=2 π
√ I
mgr
Suspension Point A
Point 1 Point 2
1.408=2 π
√ IA1
(0.6)(9.81)(0.379)
2
1.412=2 π
√ IA2
(0.6)(9.81)(0.364)
2
I A 1=0.112 kg m I A 2=0.108 kg m
Suspension Point B
Point 1 Point 2
1.356=2 π
√ I B1
(0.6)(9.81)(0.344)
2
1.388=2 π
√ I B2
(0.6)(9.81)(0.359)
2
I B 1=0.094 kg m I B 2=0.103 kg m
I G=m r G (L−r G )
Reference
A B
Point
1 I G , A 1=mr A 1 (L A 1−r A 1) I G , B 1=m r B 1 (LB 1 −r B 1 )
I G , A 1=(0.6)(0.379)(0.493−0.379) I G , B 1=( 0.6 )( 0.344 ) ( 0.457−0.344 )
2 2
I G , A 1=0.0259 kgm I G , B 1=0.0233 k kgm
2 I G , A 2=mr A 2 (L A 2−r A 2) I G , B 2=m r B 2 (LB 2−r B 2 )
16
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Theoretical Calculation:
Wooden pendulum = 0.6 kg
Gravity, g = 9.81 m/s2
Distance from point A to B, x = 0.702 m
Distance from point B to A, x = 0.723 m
Width of wooden pendulum, w = 0.1 m
0.8 m
0.034 m 0.025 m
L (0.8m)
1
2 3 L (0.45m)
D (0.025m)
W (0.08m) H (0.011m)
17
D (0.08m)
H (0.011m)
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
2 V 2=πr h
2
6.4 × 10−3 ¿−( 4.909 ×10−6 )−(5.045× 10−
2 −3
V 2=π ( 0.0125 ) ( 0.01 ) V T =6.345 ×10
−6
V 2=4.909 ×10
2
3 V 3= ( Lengt h × Heig h t ×Widt h ) + πr h
2
V 3= ( 0.011×0.45 ×0.01 )+ π ( 0.0055 ) ( 0.01 )
−5
V 3=5.045 × 10
mT
ρT =
VT
0.6
ρT = −3
6.345× 10
3
ρT =94.563 kg /m
c) Mass of each component:
m1=0.605 mT =0.600
2 m2
94.563= −6
4.909 ×10
−4
m2=4.642× 10
3 m3
94.563= −5
5.045 × 10
18
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
−3
m3=4.771× 10
Ӯ=
∑Ӯ A
∑A
Suspension Point A:
Component Ӯ (m) A(m2) ӮA(m2)
1 0.4 (0.8)(0.08)=0.064 0.0256
2 0.7605 2
π ( 0.0125 ) =4.909× 10
−4
3.733 ×10
−4
Σ A=0.0696 Σ ӯ A=0.0274
0.0274
Ӯ A=
0.0696
Ӯ A =0.394 m
19
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Suspension Point B:
Component Ӯ (m) A(m2) ӮA(m2)
1 0.4 (0.8)(0.08)=0.064 0.0256
2 −4 −5
2 0.0395 π ( 0.0125 ) =4.909× 10 1.939 ×10
3 0.525 ( 0.011× 0.45 ) + π ¿ 2.649 ×10
−3
Σ A=0.0695 Σ ӯ A=0.0283
0.0283
Ӯ B=
0.0695
Ӯ B=0.407 m
Suspension Point A:
Ӯ A =0.394 m
Component
Moment of Inertia, Ī ( mkg ) 2 Total Moment of Inertia, Σ Ī ( mkg )2
1 2 2
Ī A 1= mh + md
12
1 1
Ī A 1= ( 0.605 ) ( 0.8 )2 + ( 0.605 ) ( 0.394−0.4 )2
12
Ī A 1=0.0323
Ī G , A =Ī A 1−Ī A 2−Ī A 3
1 2 2
Ī A 2= mr + md
12 Ī G , A =0.0323−( 6.476 ×10−5) −(1.481×10−4 )
1 −4 2 −4 Ī G , A2=0.0321
2 Ī A 2= (4.642× 10 )(0.0125) +(4.642 ×10 )(0.394−0.7675)
12
−5
Ī A 2=6.476 ×10 2
Ī O , A =Ī G , A +md
2
Ī O , A =0.0321+ ( 0.6 )( 0.394 )
1 2 2
Ī A 3= mh + md Ī O , A =0.1252
12
1 −3 2 −3 2
3 Ī A 3= (4.771× 10 )(0.45) +(4.771× 10 )(0.394−0.275)
12
−4
Ī A 3=1.481 ×10
20
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Suspension Point B:
Ӯ B=0.407 m
Component Moment of Inertia, Total Moment of Inertia
1 2 2
Ī B 1= mh + md
12
1 2 2
Ī B 1= (0.605)(0.8) +(0.605)(0.407−0.4)
12
1
Ī B 1=0.0323
Ī G ,B =Ī B 1−Ī B 2−Ī B 3
Ī G ,B =0.0323−( 6.511×10−5 )−(1.469× 10− 4)
1 2 2
Ī B 2= mr + md
12 Ī G ,B =0.0321
1 −4 2 −4 2
Ī B 2= (4.642× 10 )(0.0125) +(4.642 ×10 )(0.407−0.0325)
12 2
2 Ī O ,B =Ī G , B +md
−5
Ī B 2=6.511×10 2
Ī O ,B =0.0321+ ( 0.6 )( 0.407 )
Ī O ,B =0.1315
1 2 2
Ī B 3= m h + md
12
1 −3 2 −3 2
3 Ī B 3= (4.771× 10 )(0.45) +(4.771× 10 )(0.407−0.525)
12
−4
Ī B 3=1.469 ×10
Component 1:
2
Ī Adj =Ī + md
2
Ī Adj =0.0323+(0.605)(0.373)
2
Ī Adj =0.1165 kgm
21
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Component 2:
2
Ī Adj =Ī + md
−5 −4 2
Ī Adj =6.476 × 10 +( 4.642 ×10 )(0)
−5 2
Ī Adj =6.476 × 10 kgm
Component 3
2
Ī Adj =Ī + md
−4 −3 2
Ī Adj =1.481 ×10 +(4.771 ×10 )(0.486)
−3 2
Ī Adj =1.275 ×10 kgm
22
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Component 1:
2
Ī Adj =Ī + md
2
Ī Adj =0.0323+(0.605)(0.35)
2
Ī Adj =0.1 06 kgm
Component 2:
2
Ī Adj =Ī + md
−5 −4 2
Ī Adj =6.511× 10 +(4.642 ×10 )(0.711)
−4 2
Ī Adj =3.0 ×10 kgm
Component 3
2
Ī Adj =Ī + md
−4 −3 2
Ī Adj =1.469 ×10 +(4.771 ×10 )(0.225)
−4 2
Ī Adj =3.884 × 10 kgm
23
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
𝑡 =2 𝜋
√ 𝐿
𝑔
At point A,
24
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
T1:
1.408=2 𝜋
√
𝐿 𝐴 1=0.494 𝑚
𝐿𝐴1
9.81
T2:
1.412=2 𝜋
√
𝐿 𝐴 2=0.495 𝑚
𝐿𝐴2
9.81
At point B,
T1:
1.356=2 𝜋
𝐿𝐵1=0.457 𝑚
√ 𝐿 𝐵1
9.81
T2:
1.388=2 𝜋
𝐿𝐵2=0.479𝑚
√ 𝐿𝐵 2
9.81
25
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Value of Radius, 𝑟
𝑥 ( 𝐿 𝐵− 𝑥 )
𝑟 𝐴=
𝐿 𝐴 + 𝐿𝐵 −2 𝑥
𝑟 𝐵=𝑥 − 𝑟 𝐴
At point A,
T1:
0.702 ( 0.457 −0.702 )
𝑟 𝐴 1=
0.494 +0.457 −2 ( 0.702 )
𝑟 𝐴 1=0.38𝑚
T2:
0.702 ( 0.479− 0.702 )
𝑟 𝐴 2=
0.495+ 0.479− 2 ( 0.702 )
𝑟 𝐴 2=0.36 𝑚
At point B,
T1:
𝑟 𝐵1=0.723 − 0.38
𝑟 𝐵1=0.34 𝑚
T2:
𝑟 𝐵2=0.723 − 0.36
𝑟 𝐵2=0.36 𝑚
26
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Moment of Inertia, I
𝑡 =2 𝜋 (√ 𝑚𝑔𝑟𝐼 )
At point A,
T1:
1.408=2 𝜋
√ 𝐼 𝐴1
( 0.6 ) ( 9.81 ) ( 0.38 )
2
𝐼 𝐴1 =0.112𝑘𝑔 𝑚
T2:
1.412=2 𝜋
√ 𝐼 𝐴2
( 0.6 ) ( 9.81 ) ( 0.36 )
2
𝐼 𝐴2 =0.108 𝑘𝑔𝑚
At point B,
T1:
1.356=2 𝜋
√ 𝐼 𝐵1
( 0.6 )( 9.81 ) ( 0.34 )
2
𝐼 𝐵 1=0.094 𝑘𝑔𝑚
T2:
1.356=2 𝜋
√ 𝐼 𝐵2
( 0.6 )( 9.81 ) ( 0.36 )
2
𝐼 𝐵 2=0.103 𝑘𝑔 𝑚
At point A,
T1:
𝐼 𝐺𝐴1=( 0.6 ) ( 0.38 ) ( 0.494 −0.38 )
2
𝐼 𝐺𝐴1=0.0259 𝑘𝑔 𝑚
T2:
𝐼 𝐺𝐴2=𝑚 𝑟 𝐴2 ( 𝐿 𝐴 2 −𝑟 𝐴 2 )
27
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Figure: Dimension
28
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Total Volume:
𝑉 𝑇 =𝑉 1 −𝑉 2 − 𝑉 3
𝑉 𝑇 =( 6.4 ×10 −4 ) − ( 4.909 ×10 −6 ) − ( 4.95 ×10−5 )
−4
𝑉 𝑇 =5.856× 10
Density of Pendulum
𝑚𝑇
𝜌𝑇 =
𝑉𝑇
0.6
𝜌𝑇 = −4
5.856 × 10
𝑘𝑔
𝜌 𝑇 =1024.6 3
𝑚
Component 1:
𝑚1
1024.6= −4
6.4 ×10
𝑚1=0.66 𝑘𝑔
Component 2:
𝑚2
1024.6= −5
4.95 ×10
𝑚2=0.051𝑘𝑔
Component 3:
29
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
𝑚3
1024.6= −6
4.909 ×10
𝑚3=0.005 𝑘𝑔
30
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Component 1:
0 . 66 ( 0 . 82 +0 . 082 )
𝐼 ❑=
12
−2 2
𝐼 ❑=3 .56 × 10 𝑘𝑔𝑚
Component 2:
0.051 ( 0.8 2+ 0.082 )
𝐼 ❑=
12
−4
𝐼 ¿ 8.61 ×10
Component 3:
2
0.005 ( 0.0125 )
𝐼¿
12
−7
𝐼 ¿ 3.91 ×10
=4.909 × 10-4
=0.069 =0.258
Σ𝑦 𝐴
𝑦=
Σ𝐴
𝑦 𝐴=3.74 𝑚
31
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
Σ𝑦 𝐴
𝑦=
Σ𝐴
𝑦 𝐵=3.74 𝑚
5.0 DISCUSSIONS
Based on the experiment conducted, the values of mass moment of inertia at the center of
gravity, IG, and at the suspension point at point A and point B, I O are determined based on the
formulae in experimental calculation and theoretical calculation. After calculating for
experimental and theoretical, there are huge differences between the values. This could lead to
a very high percentage of error. The range of percentage error is between 28% until 85%.
From the experiment, it has been shown that there are a few errors that occurred affecting the
result of the experiment which are environmental error and parallax error. Firstly,
environmental error could play a part in this experiment where it is held in a laboratory room
where there could be a blowing wind when the wooden pendulum is swinged. Secondly,
parallax error could also occur when conducting the experiment because the placement of
protractor is so high up. When the wooden pendulum has to be subjected to 10˚ angle, it is hard
to correctly place the wooden pendulum at 10˚ angle because the eyes are supposed to be
32
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
perpendicular to the reading scale. Moreover, parallax error can occur when taking the
dimensions of the wooden pendulum using a steel ruler.
From the experiment conducted, the time taken from 2 different suspension point was
taken. From each point, there are 2 release point. The wooden pendulum is place at 10˚ angle
for both of the suspension point. From the first suspension point (left), the time taken for 10
complete oscillation is average 14 s and for the other point (right), the average time taken to
complete 10 oscillation is 14.1 s. For the second suspension point (left), the average time taken
to complete 10 oscillations is 13.5 s and for the other point (right), the average time taken to
complete 10 oscillations is 13.9 s.
For the mass moment of inertia at the center of the gravity and at the suspension point,
formula calculation is needed to find it. Both of these value is calculated using mathematical
formula. From the calculations, the value for moment of inertia at point A is higher than the
value at point B. The percentage of error for this experiment is calculated and the value of the
percentage of error is high. This maybe cause by the error while conducting the experiment.
In this experiment, the mass moment of inertia at the center of gravity (Ī G) and the
suspension point (ĪO) of a hardwood block were measured empirically and theoretically. The
block included two suspension points: A and B. .The experiment used oscillation to show the
mass moment of inertia of an inhomogeneous pendulum. Measurements were taken at the
pendulum's center of gravity (ĪG) and suspension point (ĪO) on opposite ends. The experiment
involved suspending a non-homogeneous wooden pendulum at 10° for both left and right
suspension points and recording the time for 10 oscillations. Three sets of tests were
undertaken to assess suspension point differences.
From the results gotten, there are the data from theoretical and experimental are vary
due to the different point which is point A and point B. Point A showing a higher moment of
inertia due to its greater mass compared to point B. The error percentage is quite high due to
33
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
many factors such as environmental factors such as wind causing air resistance and apparatus
errors from pendulum collisions impacted the data.
To avoid this error in the future, experiments can be conducted in controlled conditions
with low air movement to reduce wind and air resistance. To reduce friction and mistakes,
experimenters should swing the pendulum in a straight path and avoid contact with the
equipment.
34
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
35
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
motion. These adjustments aim to improve the accuracy and reliability of our experimental
outcomes
As a result of achieving the objective of identifying and calculating the mass moment of
inertia, the experiment was considered successful. By using oscillation and manual
calculations, the mass moment of inertia (I G and IO) was determined. The experiment started by
figuring out the theoretical mass moment of inertia for the wooden pendulum using the parallel
axis theorem. The time it took the pendulum to complete ten oscillations was then noted and
used as an input into a formula to calculate the experimental mass moment of inertia.
36
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
7.0 REFERENCES
37
Applied Mechanics Lab – MEC 424
8.0 APPENDIX
38