0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Lecture 2

Uploaded by

Isaac Beyuo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Lecture 2

Uploaded by

Isaac Beyuo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 41

Review

• What is security: history and definition


• Security policy, mechanisms and services
• Security models
Outline
• Overview of Cryptography
• Classical Symmetric Cipher
• Modern Symmetric Ciphers (DES)
Basic Terminology
• plaintext - the original message
• ciphertext - the coded message
• cipher - algorithm for transforming plaintext to ciphertext
• key - info used in cipher known only to sender/receiver
• encipher (encrypt) - converting plaintext to ciphertext
• decipher (decrypt) - recovering ciphertext from plaintext
• cryptography - study of encryption principles/methods
• cryptanalysis (codebreaking) - the study of principles/
methods of deciphering ciphertext without knowing key
• cryptology - the field of both cryptography and
cryptanalysis
Classification of Cryptography
• Number of keys used
– Hash functions: no key
– Secret key cryptography: one key
– Public key cryptography: two keys - public, private
• Type of encryption operations used
– substitution / transposition / product
• Way in which plaintext is processed
– block / stream
Secret Key vs. Secret Algorithm

• Secret algorithm: additional hurdle


• Hard to keep secret if used widely:
– Reverse engineering, social engineering
• Commercial: published
– Wide review, trust
• Military: avoid giving enemy good ideas
Cryptanalysis Scheme
• Ciphertext only:
– Exhaustive search until “recognizable plaintext”
– Need enough ciphertext
• Known plaintext:
– Secret may be revealed (by spy, time), thus <ciphertext,
plaintext> pair is obtained
– Great for monoalphabetic ciphers
• Chosen plaintext:
– Choose text, get encrypted
– Useful if limited set of messages
Unconditional vs. Computational Security
• Unconditional security
– No matter how much computer power is available, the
cipher cannot be broken
– The ciphertext provides insufficient information to
uniquely determine the corresponding plaintext
– Only one-time pad scheme qualifies
• Computational security
– The cost of breaking the cipher exceeds the value of
the encrypted info
– The time required to break the cipher exceeds the
useful lifetime of the info
Brute Force Search
• Always possible to simply try every key
• Most basic attack, proportional to key size
• Assume either know / recognise plaintext
Outline
• Overview of Cryptography
• Classical Symmetric Cipher
– Substitution Cipher
– Transposition Cipher
• Modern Symmetric Ciphers (DES)
Symmetric Cipher Model
Requirements
• Two requirements for secure use of symmetric
encryption:
– a strong encryption algorithm
– a secret key known only to sender / receiver
Y = EK(X)
X = DK(Y)
• Assume encryption algorithm is known
• Implies a secure channel to distribute key
Classical Substitution Ciphers
• Letters of plaintext are replaced by other
letters or by numbers or symbols
• Plaintext is viewed as a sequence of bits, then
substitution replaces plaintext bit patterns
with ciphertext bit patterns
Caesar Cipher
• Earliest known substitution cipher
• Replaces each letter by 3rd letter on
• Example:
meet me after the toga party
PHHW PH DIWHU WKH WRJD SDUWB
Caesar Cipher
• Define transformation as:
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A B C

• Mathematically give each letter a number


a b c d e f g h i j k l m

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

n o p q r s t u v w x y Z

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

• Then have Caesar cipher as:


C = E(p) = (p + k) mod (26)
p = D(C) = (C – k) mod (26)
Cryptanalysis of Caesar Cipher
• Only have 25 possible ciphers
– A maps to B,..Z
• Given ciphertext, just try all shifts of letters
• Do need to recognize when have plaintext
• E.g., break ciphertext "GCUA VQ DTGCM"
Monoalphabetic Cipher
• Rather than just shifting the alphabet
• Could shuffle (jumble) the letters arbitrarily
• Each plaintext letter maps to a different
random ciphertext letter
• Key is 26 letters long

Plain: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Cipher: DKVQFIBJWPESCXHTMYAUOLRGZN
Plaintext: ifwewishtoreplaceletters
Ciphertext: WIRFRWAJUHYFTSDVFSFUUFYA
Monoalphabetic Cipher Security
• Now have a total of 26! = 4 x 1026 keys
• Is that secure?
• Problem is language characteristics
– Human languages are redundant
– Letters are not equally commonly used
English Letter Frequencies
Example Cryptanalysis
• Given ciphertext:
UZQSOVUOHXMOPVGPOZPEVSGZWSZOPFPESXUDBMETSXAIZ

VUEPHZHMDZSHZOWSFPAPPDTSVPQUZWYMXUZUHSX

EPYEPOPDZSZUFPOMBZWPFUPZHMDJUDTMOHMQ

• Count relative letter frequencies (see text)


• Guess P & Z are e and t
• Guess ZW is th and hence ZWP is the
• Proceeding with trial and error finally get:
it was disclosed yesterday that several informal but

direct contacts have been made with political

representatives of the viet cong in moscow


One-Time Pad
• If a truly random key as long as the message is
used, the cipher will be secure - One-Time pad
• E.g., a random sequence of 0’s and 1’s XORed to
plaintext, no repetition of keys
• Unbreakable since ciphertext bears no
statistical relationship to the plaintext
• For any plaintext, it needs a random key of the
same length
– Hard to generate large amount of keys
• Have problem of safe distribution of key
Transposition Ciphers
• Now consider classical transposition or
permutation ciphers
• These hide the message by rearranging the
letter order, without altering the actual
letters used
• Can recognise these since have the same
frequency distribution as the original text
Rail Fence cipher
• Write message letters out diagonally over a
number of rows
• Then read off cipher row by row
• E.g., write message out as:
m e m a t r h t g p r y
e t e f e t e o a a t

• Giving ciphertext
MEMATRHTGPRYETEFETEOAAT
Product Ciphers
• Ciphers using substitutions or transpositions
are not secure because of language
characteristics
• Hence consider using several ciphers in
succession to make harder, but:
– Two substitutions make a more complex substitution
– Two transpositions make more complex transposition
– But a substitution followed by a transposition makes
a new much harder cipher
• This is bridge from classical to modern ciphers
Outline
• Overview of Cryptography
• Classical Symmetric Cipher
• Modern Symmetric Ciphers (DES)
Block vs Stream Ciphers
• Block ciphers process messages in into blocks,
each of which is then en/decrypted
• Like a substitution on very big characters
– 64-bits or more
• Stream ciphers process messages a bit or byte
at a time when en/decrypting
• Many current ciphers are block ciphers, one of
the most widely used types of cryptographic
algorithms
Block Cipher Principles
• Most symmetric block ciphers are based on a
Feistel Cipher Structure
• Block ciphers look like an extremely large
substitution
• Would need table of 264 entries for a 64-bit
block
• Instead create from smaller building blocks
• Using idea of a product cipher
Substitution-Permutation Ciphers
• Substitution-permutation (S-P) networks
[Shannon, 1949]
– modern substitution-transposition product cipher
• These form the basis of modern block ciphers
• S-P networks are based on the two primitive
cryptographic operations
– substitution (S-box)
– permutation (P-box)
• provide confusion and diffusion of message
Confusion and Diffusion
• Cipher needs to completely obscure statistical
properties of original message
• A one-time pad does this
• More practically Shannon suggested S-P networks
to obtain:
• Diffusion – dissipates statistical structure of
plaintext over bulk of ciphertext
• Confusion – makes relationship between
ciphertext and key as complex as possible
Feistel Cipher Structure
• Feistel cipher implements Shannon’s S-P
network concept
– based on invertible product cipher
• Process through multiple rounds which
– partitions input block into two halves
– perform a substitution on left data half
– based on round function of right half & subkey
– then have permutation swapping halves
Feistel
Cipher
Structure
DES (Data Encryption Standard)
• Published in 1977, standardized in 1979.
• Key: 64 bit quantity=8-bit parity+56-bit key
– Every 8th bit is a parity bit.
• 64 bit input, 64 bit output.

64 bit M 64 bit C
DES
Encryption

56 bits
DES Top View
56-bit Key
64-bit
48-bitInput
K1
Generate keys
Permutation Initial Permutation
48-bit K1
Round 1
48-bit K2
Round 2
…... 48-bit K16
Round 16

Swap Swap 32-bit halves

Permutation Final Permutation

64-bit Output
Bit Permutation (1-to-1)

1 2 3 4 32
0 0 1 0 ……. 1
Input:

1 bit

Output 1 0 1 1 …….. 1
22 6 13 32 3
Per-Round Key Generation
Initial Permutation of DES key

C i-1 28 bits D i-1 28 bits

Circular Left Shift Circular Left Shift


One
round Permutation Round 1,2,9,16:
with Discard single shift
Others: two bits
48 bits
Ki
Ci 28 bits Di 28 bits
A DES Round
32 bits Ln 32 bits Rn

E
One Round 48 bits
Mangler
Encryption Function 48 bits
S-Boxes Ki

32 bits

32 bits Ln+1 32 bits Rn+1


Mangler Function
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

+ + + + + + + +

S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 The permutation produces


“spread” among the
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 chunks/S-boxes!

Permutation
Bits Expansion (1-to-m)
1 2 3 4 5 32
Input: 0 0 1 0 1……. 1

Output

1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 …….. 1 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 48
S-Box (Substitute and Shrink)
• 48 bits ==> 32 bits. (8*6 ==> 8*4)
• 2 bits used to select amongst 4 substitutions
for the rest of the 4-bit quantity

2 bits I1
row I2
O1
I3 Si O2
I4 O3
I5 O4

4 bits I6
column i = 1,…8.
S-Box Examples
Each row and column contain different numbers.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9…. 15

0 14 4 13 1 2 15 11 8 3

1 0 15 7 4 14 2 13 1 10

2 4 1 14 8 13 6 2 11 15

3 15 12 8 2 4 9 1 7 5

Example: input: 100110 output: ???


DES Standard
• Cipher Iterative Action • Key Generation Box :
: – Input: 56 bits
– Input: 64 bits
– Output: 48 bits
– Key: 48 bits
– Output: 64 bits

One round (Total 16 rounds)


DES Box Summary
• Simple, easy to implement:
– Hardware/gigabits/second,
software/megabits/second
• 56-bit key DES may be acceptable for non-
critical applications but triple DES (DES3)
should be secure for most applications today
• Supports several operation modes (ECB CBC,
OFB, CFB) for different applications

You might also like