Carsten Bree Et Al - Self-Pinching of Pulsed Laser Beams During Filamentary Propagation
Carsten Bree Et Al - Self-Pinching of Pulsed Laser Beams During Filamentary Propagation
Carsten Bree Et Al - Self-Pinching of Pulsed Laser Beams During Filamentary Propagation
z
E =
i
2k
0
r
r
r
r
E +
i
0
c
n
2
|E |
2
E
i
0
2n
0
c
c
(I)E , (1)
(I) =
nt
_
1exp
_
t
_
dt
W[I(t
)]
_
_
. (2)
Here, z is the propagation variable, t the retarded time, and
0
is the central laser frequency at
0
=2n
0
/k
0
=800 nm. n
2
is the nonlinear refraction index. Photon densities are described via
the complex optical eld envelope E , with I =|E |
2
. The wavelength-dependent critical plasma
density is calculated from the Drude model according to
c
2
0
m
e
0
/q
2
e
, where q
e
and m
e
are
electron charge and mass, respectively,
0
is the dielectric constant, c the speed of light, and
nt
denotes the neutral density. Plasma generation is driven by the ionization rate W[I], which
is suitably described by Perelomov-Popov-Terentev (PPT) theory [14]. For our investigations,
we use data for argon [7] at atmospheric pressure.
In the following, we search for a eld conguration that represents a stationary state in
regimes where a Kerr-induced optical collapse is saturated by plasma defocusing. The cor-
responding temporal intensity proles that maintain a balance between competing nonlinear
effects in every temporal point are derived from a time-dependent variational approach, with
the following trial function
E =
_
P
R
2
exp
_
r
2
2R
2
+i
k
0
r
2
z
R
2R
_
. (3)
The quadratic phase guarantees preservation of continuity equations through self-similar sub-
stitutions, and the pulse radius R R(z, t) depends on both the longitudinal and temporal vari-
ables. For conservative systems preserving the power P(t) 2
_
0
I(t)rdr along z, straightfor-
ward algebra provides the virial-type identity [15]
2
z
_
0
r
3
|E |
2
dr =
2
k
2
0
_
0
r|
r
E |
2
dr
2n
2
n
0
_
0
r|E |
4
dr
1
n
2
0
_
0
|E |
2
r
2
r
dr. (4)
Inserting the trial function (3) with R(z, t) = w(z, t)/
,
with parameters N
=6.13 and
N
=1.9410
74
s
1
cm
2N
W
N
dt
I
N
+1
(t
)
P(t
)
1
(I(t) +N
I(t
)
P(t)
P(t
)
)
2
, (5)
#113266 - $15.00 USD Received 25 Jun 2009; revised 5 Aug 2009; accepted 6 Aug 2009; published 31 Aug 2009
(C) 2009 OSA 14 September 2009 / Vol. 17, No. 19 / OPTICS EXPRESS 16431
Delay (fs)
0
-20
-40
100%
50%
0
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
(b)
0
100
R
a
d
i
u
s
(
m
)
200
300
45 30 15 0 15 30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Delay (fs)
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
(
T
W
/
c
m
2
)
(a)
t
*
Fig. 1. (a) Spectrum of solutions I(t) of Eq. (5). (b) Spatio-temporal representation of the
solution of Eq. (5) marked in red [see (a)], obtained by rotating the line segment generated
by R(t) =
_
P(t)/I(t) around the taxis. Color corresponds to on-axis intensity.
with P
cr
=
2
0
/(2n
0
n
2
) and = k
2
0
N
N
nt
/
c
.
Equation (5) is basically a generalization of a Volterra-Urysohn integral equation [16], with
a kernel depending not only on I(t
<t <t
= (ln
_
P
in
/P
cr
)
1/2
t
p
.
From a physical point of view, Kerr self-focusing can compensate for diffraction only on this
interval, enabling the existence of a stationary state. For computing a stationary solution I(t)
of the integral equation, we use the method presented in [17] which combines a Chebyshev
approximation of the unknown I(t) with a Clenshaw-Curtis quadrature formula [18] for the
integral term. As the laser beam parameters, we choose a ratio P
in
/P
cr
= 2 and a pulse dura-
tion t
FWHM
=
2ln2t
p
100 fs, leading to t