Module 2-Behavior of Structures During Earthquake_Final
Module 2-Behavior of Structures During Earthquake_Final
1. Introduction
The behavior of structures during earthquakes is influenced by various factors, including their
design, material properties, and construction methods. Understanding these behaviors is essential
for developing effective earthquake-resistant designs. These are
Earthquake causes shaking of the ground. So a building resting on it will experience motion at its
base. From Newton’s First Law of Motion, even though the base of the building moves with the
ground, the roof has a tendency to stay in its original position. But since the walls and columns
are connected to it, they drag the roof along with them. This is much like the situation that you
are faced with when the bus you are standing in suddenly starts; your feet move with the bus, but
your upper body tends to stay back making you fall backwards!! This tendency to continue to
remain in the previous position is known as inertia. In the building, since the walls or columns
are flexible, the motion of the roof is different from that of the ground (Figure 2.1).
Figure 2.1: Effect of Inertia in a building when shaken at its base
Consider a building whose roof is supported on columns (Figure 2.2). Coming back to the
analogy of yourself on the bus: when the bus suddenly starts, you are thrown backwards as if
someone has applied a force on the upper body. Similarly, when the ground moves, even the
building is thrown backwards, and the roof experiences a force, called inertia force. If the roof
has a mass m and experiences an acceleration a, then from Newton’s Second Law of Motion, the
inertia force FI is mass m times acceleration a, and its direction is opposite to that of the
acceleration. Clearly, more mass means higher inertia force. Therefore, lighter buildings sustain
the earthquake shaking better.
Modern earthquake-resistant design philosophies aim to reduce the effects of inertia forces by:
Masonry buildings are brittle structures and one of the most vulnerable of the entire building
stock under strong earthquake shaking. The large number of human fatalities in such
constructions during the past earthquakes in India corroborates this. Thus, it is very important to
improve the seismic behaviour of masonry buildings. A number of earthquake-resistant features
can be introduced to achieve this objective. Ground vibrations during earthquakes cause inertia
forces at locations of mass in the building. These forces travel through the roof and walls to the
foundation.
The main emphasis is on ensuring that these forces reach the ground without causing major
damage or collapse. Of the three components of a masonry building (roof, wall and foundation)
(Figure 2.3a), the walls are most vulnerable to damage caused by horizontal forces due to
earthquake. A wall topples down easily if pushed horizontally at the top in a direction
perpendicular to its plane (termed weak direction), but offers much greater resistance if pushed
along its length (termed strong direction) (Figure 2.3b).
The ground shakes simultaneously in the vertical and two horizontal directions during
earthquakes. However, the horizontal vibrations are the most damaging to normal masonry
buildings. Horizontal inertia force developed at the roof transfers to the walls acting either in the
weak or in the strong direction. If all the walls are not tied together like a box, the walls loaded in
their weak direction tend to topple (Figure 2.4a).
To ensure good seismic performance, all walls must be joined properly to the adjacent walls. In
this way, walls loaded in their weak direction can take advantage of the good lateral resistance
offered by walls loaded in their strong direction (Figure 2.4b). Further, walls also need to be tied
to the roof and foundation to preserve their overall integrity.
Figure 2.3: Basic components of a masonry building – walls are sensitive to direction of
earthquake forces.
Figure 2.4: Advantage sharing between walls – only possible if walls are well connected.
1. Diagonal Cracks: Caused by shear forces acting in-plane, particularly during lateral
loading from earthquakes or wind.
2. Out-of-Plane Failure: Occurs when the wall is pushed or pulled perpendicular to its
plane, leading to bending and cracking.
3. Crushing of Masonry: When compression loads exceed the wall’s strength, especially
around openings or concentrated load areas.
4. Separation from Frame: In infill walls, separation can occur at the interface between the
masonry wall and the surrounding reinforced concrete (RC) frame during seismic
shaking.
Reinforcement: Adding horizontal and vertical steel reinforcement bars within the wall
or using mesh can significantly increase the wall’s strength and ductility.
Confined Masonry: This approach involves surrounding brick masonry with reinforced
concrete (RC) tie-columns and tie-beams, which enhance the wall’s lateral load capacity
and improve seismic performance.
Retrofitting: Existing masonry walls can be retrofitted with external steel braces, FRP
wraps, or shotcrete to improve their resistance to seismic forces.
Stone masonry walls exhibit different behavior compared to brick masonry walls due to the
inherent properties of stone and the construction methods used. Stone masonry is commonly
used in older buildings, historical structures, and some modern constructions in rural areas. Like
brick masonry, stone masonry is primarily strong in compression but has limitations when
subjected to lateral loads, especially under seismic forces.
1. Material Properties:
Strength: Stone has high compressive strength, often higher than brick, but its
tensile strength is very low, making it vulnerable to cracking under tension or
bending forces.
Brittleness: Stone is a brittle material, meaning it is more likely to crack rather
than deform when subjected to excessive loads.
Mortar: The behavior of stone masonry is significantly influenced by the quality
of mortar. Weaker or degraded mortar can reduce the overall strength of the wall.
Irregularity: Stone blocks can vary in size, shape, and arrangement (random
rubble, ashlar, etc.), leading to irregular stress distribution within the wall.
2. Wall Configuration:
Thickness and Height: Stone masonry walls are generally thick, which helps
them carry large compressive loads. However, increased height without proper
lateral support can make them prone to instability, such as buckling.
Joints: The mortar joints between stones can act as weak points, especially under
lateral or seismic forces. Poor bonding at these joints can cause the wall to crack
or collapse.
3. Under Gravity Loads (Vertical Loads):
Compression: Stone masonry performs well under vertical compressive loads.
The thick, heavy stones can bear large weights, which is why stone masonry is
commonly used for load-bearing walls.
Cracking: If the wall is overloaded, particularly around concentrated load areas
(e.g., near window or door openings), vertical cracks may form, especially if the
mortar is weak or there are voids in the construction.
Uneven Settlement: Stone masonry walls can be affected by differential
settlement of the foundation, which may cause diagonal cracking or separation of
stones, especially in rubble masonry where the stones are irregular.
4. Under Lateral Loads:
Shear Forces: Under lateral loads, stone masonry walls need to resist in-plane
shear forces. Since stone is strong in compression but weak in shear, cracking
along the mortar joints or at weak points in the stone may occur.
Cracking: Diagonal shear cracks are common under lateral loads. These cracks
can propagate through the mortar joints or even through the stones, particularly if
the mortar is not strong enough to hold the stones together.
Common Failure Modes
1. Diagonal Cracks: Occur due to in-plane shear forces. These cracks typically propagate
through mortar joints or weak sections of stone.
2. Out-of-Plane Collapse: Stone masonry walls often collapse when subjected to
significant out-of-plane forces, particularly during earthquakes or strong winds. The
thickness and weight of the wall contribute to its instability.
3. Mortar Deterioration: Over time, especially in older structures, the mortar can degrade,
reducing the bond between the stones and making the wall more vulnerable to cracking
and collapse.
4. Separation at Joints: Poorly bonded stones can separate from the wall under stress,
leading to localized failure or partial collapse.
5. Buckling: Tall, slender stone masonry walls are prone to buckling, especially if they lack
lateral bracing or reinforcement.
1. Reinforcement:
Installing vertical and horizontal steel reinforcement bars within the wall can help
prevent cracks and improve the wall's resistance to seismic forces.
Adding concrete tie beams or buttresses can enhance the wall’s ability to resist
lateral forces and prevent out-of-plane failures.
2. Grouting:
For older stone masonry structures, grouting the joints can improve the bonding
between stones and increase the wall’s overall strength and stiffness.
3. Retrofitting:
Shotcrete (a layer of concrete sprayed over the surface) can provide additional
strength to stone walls and prevent them from cracking under seismic or lateral
loads.
External reinforcement with materials like fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)
wraps can increase the wall’s capacity to resist lateral loads and prevent sudden
failure.
4. Confined Masonry:
Surrounding stone masonry with reinforced concrete (RC) frames or tie columns
at regular intervals can help stabilize the wall, improve load distribution, and
enhance its earthquake resistance.
5. Proper Mortar Selection:
Using stronger and more flexible mortar, such as lime-cement blends, can
improve the overall behavior of the wall by enhancing bonding between stones
and accommodating small movements without cracking.
5. Box Action
Box Action in masonry structures refers to a structural behavior where all elements of the
building—walls, floors, and roof—are connected and work together as a single unit to resist
lateral forces, such as those generated during an earthquake. This collective response helps the
building act more like a rigid box rather than a set of individual, disconnected components. The
concept is especially important in improving the earthquake resistance of masonry buildings,
which are generally brittle and vulnerable to seismic forces.
1. Monolithic Construction:
For effective box action, the walls, floors, and roof must be well-connected to one
another. This monolithic behavior ensures that when one part of the structure is
subjected to lateral forces, the entire structure works together to resist the force.
2. Diaphragms:
Horizontal elements like floors and roofs act as diaphragms. These diaphragms
transfer lateral forces to the walls, allowing the building to distribute seismic
loads across multiple elements rather than concentrating them in any one area.
Floors and roofs should be rigid and well-connected to the walls to facilitate this
force transfer.
3. Tie Beams and Bands:
Horizontal tie beams or bands (also called seismic bands) are often introduced
at various levels, such as the plinth, lintel, and roof levels. These bands tie the
walls together, preventing them from moving independently and reducing the risk
of collapse.
In masonry structures, these seismic bands significantly enhance box action by
reinforcing the wall connections and preventing cracks from propagating during
an earthquake.
4. Wall-to-Wall and Wall-to-Roof Connections:
Strong connections between perpendicular walls, as well as between walls and the
roof, are critical. If these connections are weak or absent, the walls may separate,
leading to collapse during lateral shaking.
In box action, proper anchoring and bonding between these elements prevent such
separation.
5. Corner Strengthening:
Corners of buildings are particularly vulnerable to earthquake forces.
Strengthening these corners with reinforced masonry, concrete tie columns, or
buttresses helps maintain the box action, ensuring the corners remain intact and
the building behaves as a single unit.
How Box Action Improves Earthquake Resistance
In earthquake-resistant masonry structures, seismic bands play a critical role in improving the
overall performance of the building during seismic events. These bands are horizontal elements
that reinforce the masonry walls, tying them together and preventing separation or collapse when
subjected to lateral forces. Different types of bands are used at various levels of the structure,
each with a specific purpose and function.
1. Plinth Band:
Location: The plinth band is placed at the level of the plinth, just above the
foundation. It encircles the entire building, reinforcing the base of the masonry
walls.
Significance:
This band prevents the foundation and the walls from separating or
moving independently during an earthquake.
2. Lintel Band:
Location: The lintel band is placed at the level of the top of doors, windows, and
other openings, spanning the entire perimeter of the structure.
Significance:
The lintel band helps tie the walls together at the level of the openings,
which are often weak points in masonry structures.
3. Roof Band:
Location: The roof band is placed at the top of the walls, just below the roof. It
encircles the building and ties the walls together at the roof level.
Significance:
The roof band ensures that the walls remain connected to the roof during
an earthquake, preventing them from moving independently or falling
outward (out-of-plane failure).
4. Gable Band:
Location: The gable band is placed along the gable end of the walls, which are
triangular sections of wall at the ends of sloping roofs.
Significance:
Gable walls are particularly vulnerable during earthquakes because they
are often tall and unsupported. The gable band helps prevent these walls
from collapsing outward.
5. Sill Band:
Location: The sill band is placed just below the level of the windows or other
openings, at the sill height of the windows.
Significance:
Like the lintel band, the sill band reinforces the walls at the level of the
window openings, which are weak points in the structure.
(a) Ensure proper wall construction: The wall thickness should not exceed 450mm. Round
stone boulders should not be used in the construction! Instead, the stones should be shaped using
chisels and hammers. Use of mud mortar should be avoided in higher seismic zones. Instead,
cement-sand mortar should be 1:6 (or richer) and lime-sand mortar 1:3 (or richer) should be
used.
(b) Ensure proper bond in masonry courses: The masonry walls should be built in
construction lifts not exceeding 600mm. Through-stones (each extending over full thickness of
wall) or a pair of overlapping bond-stones (each extending over at least ¾ths thickness of wall)
must be used at every 600mm along the height and at a maximum spacing of 1.2m along the
length (Figure 2.6).
Figure 2.6: Use of “through stones” or “bond stones” in stone masonry walls
(c) Provide horizontal reinforcing elements: The stone masonry dwellings must have horizontal
band. These bands can be constructed out of wood or reinforced concrete, and chosen based on
economy. It is important to provide at least one band (either lintel band or roof band) in stone
masonry construction (Figure 2.7).
Figure 2.7: Horizontal lintel band is essential in random rubble stone masonry walls
(d) Control on overall dimensions and heights: The unsupported length of walls between cross-
walls should be limited to 5m; for longer walls, cross supports raised from the ground level
called buttresses should be provided at spacing not more than 4m. The height of each storey
should not exceed 3 m. In general, stone masonry buildings should not be taller than 2 storeys
when built in cement mortar, and 1 storey when built in lime or mud mortar. The wall should
have a thickness of at least one-sixth its height.
8. Behavior of RC Structures
The behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) structures under various load conditions is crucial for
structural integrity and safety. These are
Horizontal diaphragm elements: Roof slabs, floor slabs, trussed roofs, and bracings.
Foundations and soils: Isolated and combined footings, mats, piles, wells, soil layers, and
rock.
Strength Hierarchy
Strength hierarchy assessment is a method used to identify the weakest structural element in a
reinforced concrete (RC) structure. RC is a material made of concrete and steel reinforcement
bars, which increases the strength of the structure. Here are some ways that RC structures
behave:
Tensile strength: RC can withstand a lot of tensile stresses due to the reinforcing.
Beam behavior: RC beams undergo flexural deformation. The damage mode changes from
surface cracks to spallation on the back surface as the scaled distance decreases.
Shear wall behavior: The yield strength, ultimate strength, and ductility of shear wall
specimens peak as the axial compression ratio increases. However, the ductility decreases as the
axial compression ratio increases.
Steel strength: Steel strength increases with temperature up to 400 °C, but decreases at
higher temperatures. At 700 °C, steel only retains 20% of its initial strength.
Reversal of Stresses
When reinforced concrete (RC) structures are subjected to seismic loading, the steel in the
structure is repeatedly stressed and released, which causes the bond between the steel and
concrete to experience a cyclic reversed load. This can lead to a significant degradation in the
bond capacity between the concrete and steel bar.
Here are some things to consider about the behavior of RC structures under reversed stresses:
Cyclic loading
The bond behavior between the steel and concrete is critical to simulating the hysteretic response
of RC structures under seismic loading. Cyclic loading can lead to a substantial degradation in
the bond capacity of the concrete and steel bar.
This phenomenon is caused by special displacement boundary conditions, rather than the
material properties.
Pinching effect
The presence of high shear forces can cause a severe pinching effect and strength
deterioration. However, this effect can be eliminated by properly orienting the steel grid in RC
elements.
Safety factors
The usual calculation rules for stress reversal may not always ensure sufficient safety.
Beam-column joints are a critical part of reinforced concrete (RC) structures because they
connect horizontal and vertical elements, and transfer seismic forces. Their
behavior significantly affects the structure's response, and they can be severely damaged or
destroyed during earthquakes.
Here are some important things to know about beam-column joints:
Failure
The primary cause of joint failure is insufficient shear strength, which can be due to inadequate
reinforcing details. Joint failures can lead to partial or complete structural collapse.
Seismic design
Beam-column joints are a critical element in the seismic design of RC frames. During
earthquakes, the joint region experiences high horizontal and vertical forces that are much
greater than those in the adjacent beams and columns.
Damage
Damage to beam-column joints can be difficult to fix, so it's important to minimize damage
during construction.
The behavior of joints depends on several factors, including the geometry of the joint, the
amount and detailing of reinforcement, the concrete strength, and the loading pattern.
Stiffness, strength, and ductility are all important concepts in structural engineering, especially
for seismic design. They help determine how a structure will behave under different conditions,
such as during earthquakes or other disasters:
Stiffness
A structure's ability to limit deformation when acted upon. On a stress-strain diagram, stiffness is
represented by the slope.
Strength
Ductility
A material's ability to deform without failing. In earthquake engineering, ductility describes how
well a building can withstand the lateral displacements caused by ground shaking.
The ideal structure has high levels of all three, but this can be expensive. Design codes provide
guidelines to ensure adequate stiffness, strength, and ductility, but they don't always optimize
these properties. Performance-based seismic design (PBSD) is a more tailored approach that
allows structural engineers to optimize these properties for a specific project.
The importance of stiffness and ductility is illustrated by the following examples:
o Low stiffness and high ductility: A structure with these properties may be safe but
uncomfortable to use.
o High stiffness and low ductility: A structure with these properties can be dangerous
because it may not show signs of distress before collapsing.
o Capacity design: A part of seismic checks that ensures a building's joints have enough
deformation capacity to undergo controlled ductile behavior during an earthquake.
Many situations with short column effect arise in buildings. When a building is rested on sloped
ground (Figure 2.8a), during earthquake shaking all columns move horizontally by the same
amount along with the floor slab at a particular level If short and tall columns exist within the
same storey level, then the short columns attract several times larger earthquake force and suffer
more damage as compared to taller ones.
Figure 2.8: Buildings with short columns – two explicit examples of common occurrences.
The short column effect also occurs in columns that support mezzanine floors or loft slabs that
are added in between two regular floors (Figures 2.8b).
Soft stories can cause RC structures to behave in ways that lead to significant damage or collapse
during earthquakes:
Stiffness irregularity
A soft story is a level in a building that's less stiff than the stories above or below it. This
stiffness irregularity can cause the building to collapse.
During an earthquake, the dynamic ductility demand concentrates in the soft story, while the
upper stories remain elastic. This can cause the building to collapse.
In addition to structural collapse, non-structural components (NSCs) can also fail during
earthquakes.
To prevent this type of damage, you can:
Improper Detailing
Improper detailing of reinforced concrete (RC) structures can lead to a number of issues,
including:
Bends in RC stair slabs
Improper detailing of tensile reinforcement can damage the bends in RC stair slabs.
Seismic behavior
Poor reinforcement detailing can lead to slippage between the reinforcing bars and the concrete,
which can cause collapse.
Non-structural walls
In earthquakes, non-structural walls can separate from the reinforced concrete frame, causing
damage and collapse.
Beam-column joints
Reinforcement detailing can impact the behavior of RC beam-column joints under seismic
loads. For example, increasing the longitudinal reinforcement of the beam or decreasing the size
of the beam stirrup can decrease displacement and curvature ductility.
Strength and stiffness: Infill walls increase the strength and stiffness of the RC frame.
Lateral loading: Infill walls change the lateral loading behavior of the RC frame. The frame
experiences biaxial stresses, with compression on the diagonal and tension perpendicular to it.
Structural load transfer: Infill walls change the structural load transfer mechanism from
frame action to truss action. This means that the frame columns experience increased axial
forces, but reduced bending moments and shear forces.
Seismic performance: Infill walls can contribute to the seismic performance of the
structure. They can reduce ductility, lesser the number of plastic hinges at collapse, and increase
stiffness.
Deformation pattern: Infill walls alter the deformation pattern of the RC frame by
constraining the end portions of the columns from moving laterally. This results in flexure cracks
throughout the column's height.
Energy dissipation: Infill walls can increase the energy dissipation capacity of the RC
frame.
The effect of infill walls can be modeled using different approaches, such as the equivalent
diagonal strut model. The diagonal strut model can take on different forms, including a single,
double, or three diagonal struts.
Effect of Eccentricity
Eccentricity is the distance from the joint to the end of a member. The behavior of reinforced
concrete (RC) structures is affected by eccentricity in a number of ways, including:
Failure modes: The failure mode of an eccentric column depends on the eccentricity and the
amount of tensile steel reinforcement. Small eccentricities result in few transverse cracks, while
large eccentricities result in plastic fracture with concrete crushing and tensile reinforcement
yielding.
Stability: Eccentricity decreases the rigidity of a column, causing the structure to lose
stability faster.