PID Controllers For Time-DelaySys
PID Controllers For Time-DelaySys
Series Editor
William S. Levine
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742-3285
USA
PID Controllers
for Time-Delay Systems
Birkhauser
Boston • Basel • Berlin
Guillermo J. Silva Aniruddha Datta
IBM Department of Electrical Engineering
11400 Burnet Road Texas A&M University
Austin, TX 78758 College Station, TX 77843
USA USA
S.P. Bhattachaiyya
Department of Electrical Engineering
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843
USA
TJ223.P55S55 2004
629.8'3-dc22 2004062387
My wife Sezi§ for her loving support and endless patience, and my parents
Guillermo and Elvia.
G. J. Silva
The memory of my friend and mentor, the late Yakov Z. Tsypkin, Russian
control theorist and academician whose many contributions include the
first results, in 194-6, analyzing the stability of time-delay systems.
S. P. Bhattacharyya
Contents
Preface xi
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Introduction to Control 1
1.2 The Magic of Integral Control 3
1.3 PID Controllers 6
1.4 Some Current Techniques for PID Controller Design . . . . 7
1.4.1 The Ziegler-Nichols Step Response Method 7
1.4.2 The Ziegler-Nichols Frequency Response Method . . 9
1.4.3 PID Settings using the Internal Model Controller
Design Technique 11
1.4.4 Dominant Pole Design: The Cohen-Coon Method . . 13
1.4.5 New Tuning Approaches 14
1.5 Integrator Windup 16
1.5.1 Setpoint Limitation 16
1.5.2 Back-Calculation and Tracking 17
1.5.3 Conditional Integration 17
1.6 Contribution of this Book 18
1.7 Notes and References 18
References 323
Index 329
Preface
controller set. Within this set further design choices must be made that
reflect concerns such as cost, size, packaging, and other intangibles beyond
the scope of the theory given here.
The PID controller is very important in control engineering appHcations
and is widely used in many industries. Thus any improvement in design
methodology has the potential to have a significant engineering and eco-
nomic impact. An excellent account of many practical aspects of PID con-
trol is given in PID Controllers: Theory, Design and Tuning by Astrom
and Hagglund [2], to which we refer the interested reader; we have chosen
to not repeat these considerations here. At the other end of the spectrum
there is a vast mathematical literature on the analysis of stability of time-
delay systems which we have also not included. We refer the reader to the
excellent and comprehensive recent work Stability of Time-Delay Systems
by Gu, Kharitonov, and Chen [15] for these results. In other respects our
work is self-contained in the sense that we present proofs and justfications
of all results and algorithms developed by us.
We believe that these results are timely and in phase with the resurgence
of interest in the PID controller and the general rekindling of interest in
fixed and low-order controller design. As we know there are hardly any
results in modern and postmodern control theory in this regard while such
controllers are the ones of choice in applications. Classical control theory
approaches, on the other hand, generally produce a single controller based
on ad hoc loop-shaping techniques and are also inadequate for the kind
of computer-aided multiple performance specifications design applications
advocated here. Thus we hope that our monograph acts as a catalyst to
bridge the theory-practice gap in the control field as well as the classical-
modern gap.
The results reported here were derived in the Ph.D. theses of Ming-Tzu
Ho, Guillermo Silva, and Hao Xu at Texas A&M University and we thank
the Electrical Engineering Department for its logistical support. We also
acknowledge the financial support of the National Science Foundation's
Engineering Systems Program under the directorship of R. K. Baheti and
the support of National Instruments, Austin, Texas.