Al-Farabi

Al-Farabi (c. 872–950 CE), also known as Alpharabius in the West, was a prominent Muslim
philosopher, scientist, and musician of the Islamic Golden Age. He was born in Farab, in
modern-day Kazakhstan, and spent much of his life traveling and studying in various centers of
learning across the Islamic world, including Baghdad and Damascus.

Life and Work:

 Al-Farabi studied in Baghdad, where he was exposed to the works of Greek philosophers,
particularly Aristotle and Plato, through translations into Arabic.
 He wrote extensively on a wide range of subjects, including philosophy, political theory,
music, logic, and psychology. His works were instrumental in transmitting and
synthesizing Greek philosophy within the Islamic intellectual tradition.
 Al-Farabi's influence extended beyond the Islamic world, with his works being translated
into Latin and Hebrew and studied by European scholars during the Middle Ages. He is
often regarded as one of the greatest philosophers of the medieval period.

Major Works:
 "The Book of Letters" (Kitab al-Huruf): A work on phonetics and the Arabic alphabet.
 "The Book of Religion" (Kitab al-Milla): presents his views on the ideal city-state
governed by a philosopher-king.
 "The Book of Opinions of the Inhabitants of the Virtuous City" (Kitab Ara' Ahl al-
Madinah al-Fadilah): outlining the ideal society governed by reason and virtue.
 "The Book of Principles" (Kitab al-Um): discusses the nature of existence, knowledge,
and the soul.
 "The Book of Harmonics" (Kitab al-Musiqi al-Kabir): A treatise on music theory.

Philosophy:
Al-Farabi's philosophy was deeply influenced by Greek thinkers such as Aristotle and Plato, but
he also incorporated elements of Islamic theology and mysticism into his works. Some key
aspects of his philosophy include:
Neo-Platonism: Al-Farabi synthesized Neo-Platonic ideas with Islamic thought, particularly in
his metaphysical and cosmological views.
Political Philosophy: He advocated for the ideal city-state ruled by a philosopher-king, where
reason and virtue guide governance and ensure the well-being of citizens.
Ethics: Al-Farabi emphasized the importance of moral virtues and the pursuit of eudaimonia
(human flourishing) in individual and societal life.

Page 1 of 53
Music and Aesthetics: He explored the metaphysical and psychological dimensions of music,
viewing it as a reflection of cosmic harmony and a means to cultivate the soul.
Overall, Al-Farabi's philosophy represents a significant synthesis of Greek, Islamic, and
Persian intellectual traditions.

Key Terms
Madinah al-Fadilah (The Virtuous City): This term refers to Al-Farabi's ideal political state, as
discussed in his work "The Book of Opinions of the Inhabitants of the Virtuous City". It
represents an idealized society governed by reason and virtue, where citizens live harmoniously
according to ethical principles.
Mabadi' ara' ahl al-Madinah al-Fadilah (The Principles of the Opinions of the Inhabitants
of the Virtuous City): This term refers to Al-Farabi's political philosophy, which outlines the
foundational principles underlying the governance and organization of the Virtuous City.
Asas al-Maqulat (The Principles of Thoughts): Al-Farabi used this term to refer to logic, the
science of correct reasoning and inference. He emphasized the importance of logic in
philosophical inquiry and intellectual development.
Al-Madina al-Munawwara (The Illuminated City): This term represents Al-Farabi's
metaphorical depiction of the philosopher's role within society. The philosopher, akin to a beacon
of light, illuminates the minds of others through wisdom and knowledge.
Hayy (Life): Al-Farabi discussed the concept of "hayy" in his metaphysical and ethical works,
exploring the nature of life and its relation to existence and the soul.
Nafs (Soul): Al-Farabi extensively discussed the concept of the soul in his works on metaphysics
and psychology. He distinguished between various faculties of the soul and their roles in human
cognition and behavior.
Fitrah (Natural Disposition): This term refers to the innate human predisposition towards
moral and rational behavior, which Al-Farabi discussed in his ethical and political writings.
Asas al-Hayat (The Principles of Life): Al-Farabi used this term to refer to metaphysics, the
branch of philosophy concerned with the study of existence, being, and reality.

Human Grouping
One of Farabi's notable contributions was his understanding of human grouping and society.
Ideal City (Madinat al-Fadilah):
 Al-Farabi's vision of a perfect society.
 Inspired by Plato's Republic.
 Governed by philosopher-kings.

Page 2 of 53
Human Nature and Society:
 Humans naturally form groups and communities.
 Grouping helps achieve common goals.
 Provides mutual protection and support.
 Forming societies is a natural part of human nature.
 Humans thrive best in organized communities, not in isolation.
Virtuous Leadership:
 Essential for maintaining social harmony and order.
 Ideal rulers should have:
 Wisdom.
 Moral integrity.
 Deep understanding of justice
 Just governance by wise leaders fosters a thriving community and individual flourishing.

Basis of Human Grouping according to Farabi

According to Al-Farabi, human grouping is based on several key factors, rooted in human nature
and social dynamics:
Social Nature:
 Farabi believed that humans are inherently social beings.
 They possess a natural inclination to form communities and associations with others.
 This social nature arises from the need for companionship, mutual support, and
collaboration in pursuing common goals.
Mutual Benefit:
 Farabi argued that individuals come together in groups because they recognize the
benefits of cooperation and collective action.
 By pooling their resources, skills, and efforts, individuals can achieve outcomes that
would be difficult or impossible to attain alone.
 Grouping allows for the division of labor, specialization, and the efficient allocation of
resources.
Protection and Security:
 Human grouping also serves the fundamental need for security and protection.

Page 3 of 53
  By banding together, individuals can better defend themselves against external threats,
such as natural disasters, predators, or hostile groups.
Cultural and Social Identity:
 Farabi recognized the importance of shared values, beliefs, and cultural practices in
fostering group cohesion.
 Humans often form groups based on common cultural, religious, ethnic, or ideological
affiliations.
 These shared identities create a sense of belonging and solidarity among group members,
strengthening social bonds and promoting cooperation.

Governance and Order:

 Farabi emphasized the role of governance in facilitating human grouping.
 Effective leadership and just governance are essential for maintaining social cohesion,
resolving conflicts, and promoting the common good.
 Farabi's ideal ruler, the philosopher-king, is tasked with fostering harmony and justice
within the community, thereby ensuring the stability and prosperity of the group.

Significance of Al Farabis’s idea of Human Grouping

Frarabi’s concept of human grouping, holds relevance in both philosophy and social sciences.
Social Nature of Humans:
 Farabi asserted that humans are inherently social beings and that social interaction is
essential for their well-being.
 By forming groups, individuals can collaborate, support each other, and achieve common
goals more effectively.
Ethical and Political Implications:
 He argued that the ideal society is one where individuals cooperate harmoniously for the
common good.
 This vision influenced his political philosophy, particularly his ideas on the ideal state
and governance.
Cultural Exchange and Progress:
 Farabi believed that human grouping fosters cultural exchange and intellectual
development.
 Through interaction with others in their groups, individuals share ideas, knowledge, and
experiences, leading to cultural enrichment and progress.

Page 4 of 53
Unity in Diversity:
 Farabi recognized the diversity within human groups, including differences in culture,
beliefs, and interests.
 However, he also emphasized the importance of unity among group members despite
these differences, advocating for tolerance, understanding, and cooperation.
Psychological and Emotional Support:
 Human grouping provides individuals with psychological and emotional support.
 Being part of a group satisfies the human need for companionship, belonging, and
intimacy, contributing to overall well-being and happiness.

Al-Farabi Concept of state

 Al-Farabi's concept of the state, was deeply influenced by his understanding of Plato's
Republic and Aristotle's Politics, as well as by Islamic political thought of his time.
 His ideas on the state reflect his broader philosophical views on ethics, society, and
governance.

key aspects of Al-Farabi's concept of the state:

Ideal State as a Virtuous Society
 Al-Farabi envisioned an ideal state as a virtuous society.
 This society is guided by reason and justice.
 He believed the primary purpose of the state is to promote the well-being and moral
developments of its citizens.
 In his work "The Virtuous City" (also known as "Al-Madina al-Fadila"):
 He described a utopian city-state, governed by a philosopher ruler who possesses both
intellectual and moral virtues.

Philosopher-King
 Al-Farabi argued that the ideal state should be ruled by a philosopher-king or an
enlightened ruler who possesses wisdom, knowledge, and moral integrity.
 This ruler would govern with reason and virtue, ensuring the welfare and happiness of the
citizens.

Hierarchy of Societal Classes

Page 5 of 53
  Al-Farabi proposed a hierarchical societal structure consisting of different classes or
ranks, each with its own role and function in society.
 At the top of the hierarchy were the philosopher-kings or rulers, followed by the
guardians (warriors) and the common people

Role of Religion and Law

 Al-Farabi emphasized the importance of religion and law in maintaining social order and
cohesion.
 He believed that religion, particularly a "true" religion based on rational principles,
could serve as a unifying force in society.
 He also recognized the need for a just legal system to regulate human behavior and
resolve disputes.

Public Welfare and Common Good

The ultimate goal of the state, according to Al-Farabi, was to promote the public welfare and
common good. He viewed the state as a moral community where individuals cooperate for the
greater good, rather than solely pursuing their self-interests.

Civic Virtue and Education

 Al-Farabi emphasized the importance of civic virtue and education in the ideal state. He
believed that citizens should be educated to cultivate moral virtues, rationality, and a
sense of civic responsibility.
 Education produces virtuous and enlightened individuals who could contribute to the
well-being of society.
Overall, Al-Farabi sought to reconcile Greek philosophical traditions with Islamic teachings to
articulate a vision of governance that prioritized virtue, justice, and the common good.

Virtue according to Al-Farabi

 Al-Farabi considered Virtue, a central concept in ethics and political philosophy.
 He defined virtue (or "excellence") as a state of character or disposition that enables
individuals to act in accordance with reason and moral principles.

key aspects of Al-Farabi's understanding of virtue

Intellectual and Moral Virtue

Page 6 of 53
  Al-Farabi distinguished between intellectual virtues, which pertain to the intellect and
knowledge, and moral virtues, which relate to character and conduct.
 Intellectual virtues include qualities such as wisdom, understanding, and theoretical
knowledge, while moral virtues encompass traits like courage, justice, temperance, and
benevolence.

Harmony of the Soul

 According to Al-Farabi, virtue involves achieving a harmonious balance within the soul.
 This balance entails the integration of reason, emotions, and desires, with reason guiding
and controlling the passions.
 In the virtuous person, reason governs the appetitive and spirited aspects of the soul,
leading to moral excellence and right conduct.

Development through Education and Habituation

 Al-Farabi believed that virtue could be cultivated and developed through education and
habituation. He emphasized the importance of moral education in shaping individuals'
character and instilling virtuous habits.
 Better habituation leads the proper upbringing and training. individuals could acquire
the virtues necessary for living a good and fulfilling life. fulfilling life.

Virtue as the Means to Happiness

 Al-Farabi argued that virtuous conduct leads to inner peace, fulfillment, and harmony
with the natural order.
 The virtuous person, guided by reason and moral principles, experiences a sense of
well-being and contentment, irrespective of external circumstances.

Social and Political Dimension

 Virtue is not only a personal attribute but also has implications for society and politics.
 Al-Farabi believed that a virtuous ruler, possessing both intellectual and moral virtues,
would govern with wisdom, justice, and benevolence, thereby promoting the common
good and stability of the state.
 Similarly, virtuous citizens contribute to the moral health and prosperity of the
community through their ethical behavior and civic engagement.

Kinds of State
Al-Farabi presented different types of states or political regimes according to their ruling
principles, the qualities of their rulers, and the level of justice they embody.

Ideal State (Virtuous City)

Page 7 of 53
  Basis: Al-Farabi's ideal state, also known as the Virtuous City (Al-Madina al-Fadila), is
based on Plato's concept of the ideal city-state as presented in "The Republic."
 Characteristics: In this utopian state, the ruling class consists of philosopher-kings or
wise rulers who possess both intellectual and moral virtues. Justice prevails, and the
citizens live in harmony, guided by reason and virtue. The ideal state prioritizes the
common good and the pursuit of wisdom and virtue.

Timocratic State
 Basis: Al-Farabi drew on Plato's typology of regimes, which includes the timocratic
regime, characterized by a ruling class of warriors or guardians motivated by honor
and duty.
 Characteristics: In the timocratic state, the ruling class is composed of courageous and
spirited individuals who Prioritize honor and military prower. While this regime
values discipline and public service, it may also be prone to militarism and the pursuit of
glory.

Aristocratic State
 Basis: Al-Farabi's aristocratic state draws on Aristotle's classification of political regimes,
particularly the aristocracy, which is characterized by rule by the virtuous and the best.
 Characteristics: In the aristocratic state, governance is entrusted to a virtuous elite or
nobility who possess intellectual and moral excellence. This regime values meritocracy
and excellence, with rulers chosen based on their virtues and qualifications rather than
hereditary status.

Democracy and Oligarchy

 Basis: Al-Farabi also acknowledges the regimes of democracy and oligarchy, which are
characterized by rule by the many (democracy) or rule by the few (oligarchy).
 Characteristics: In a democracy, power is vested in the hands of the people, while in an
oligarchy, it is concentrated among a wealthy or influential few. Al-Farabi evaluates
these regimes based on their capacity for justice, stability, and the promotion of the
common good.

Qualities of Sovereign/ Rais-Al-Awal

The Rais-al-Awal the "First Ruler", is the highest authority in the state and plays a crucial role in
governing society. Farabi emphasizes certain qualities that the sovereign should possess in order
to effectively fulfill their role. These are,

Wisdom and Knowledge

Page 8 of 53
  The sovereign should be wise and knowledgeable, possessing a deep understanding of
philosophy, ethics, politics, and governance.
 Wisdom enables the ruler to make informed decisions, understand complex issues, and
govern with prudence.

Intellectual Virtue
 Along with wisdom, the sovereign should possess intellectual virtues such as rationality,
logical reasoning, and critical thinking.
 These virtues enable the ruler to discern truth from falsehood, evaluate policies and laws,
and promote the common good.

Moral Integrity
 The ruler should be honest, just, and virtuous, adhering to ethical principles and setting a
moral example for the citizens.
 Moral integrity fosters trust and respect among the people and ensures the legitimacy of
the ruler's authority.

Benevolence and Compassion

 The sovereign should demonstrate benevolence and compassion towards the citizens,
caring for their welfare and promoting their happiness.
 A compassionate ruler seeks to alleviate the suffering of the people, address their needs,
and create conditions for their flourishing.

Courage and Firmness

The sovereign should possess courage and firmness in decision-making and leadership. Courage
enables the ruler to confront challenges, resist external threats, and uphold justice, even in the
face of opposition or adversity.

Practical Wisdom (Phronesis)

In addition to theoretical wisdom, the sovereign should possess practical wisdom or phronesis,
which involves the ability to apply theoretical knowledge to practical situations and navigate the
complexities of governance effectively.

Leadership and Charisma

The sovereign should exhibit strong leadership qualities and charisma, inspiring confidence and
loyalty among the people. Effective leadership entails the ability to articulate a vision, mobilize
support, and unite the citizens towards common goals.

Al-Farabi’s Contribution to Political Philosophy

Page 9 of 53
 I. Integration of Greek and Islamic Thought
Al-Farabi synthesized elements of Greek philosophy, particularly the works of Plato and
Aristotle, with Islamic theology and jurisprudence. He adapted Greek political concepts to
address the socio-political context of the Islamic world, creating a unique and influential body of
political thought.
II. Ethics and Politics
Al-Farabi emphasized the relationship between ethics and politics, arguing that the primary
purpose of the state is to promote the moral and intellectual development of its citizens.
III. Role of Religion and Law
Al-Farabi discussed the role of religion and law in governance, proposing that a "true" religion
based on rational principles could serve as a unifying force in society.
IV. Ideal state
V. Philosopher kings
VI. Classification of regimes

…………….. AL-MAWARDI ……………..

Introduction
 Al-Mawardi (972–1058 CE), also known as Abu al-Hasan al-Mawardi.
He was a prominent Islamic jurist, philosopher, and political theorist of the Abbasid
Caliphate.
 His thoughts are primarily articulated in his work "Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyya" (The
Ordinances of Government).
 Al-Mawardi was born in Basra, Iraq, during a period of significant political instability in
the Muslim world.
 The Abbasid Caliphate, which had been in decline for several centuries, faced internal
strife and external threats.

Al-Mawardi Islamic State:

 Al-Mawardi's conception of the Islamic state is outlined primarily in his influential work
"Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyyah" (The Ordinances of Government).

Features

Page 10 of 53
 Caliphate: Central to Al-Mawardi's understanding of the Islamic state is the institution of
the caliphate.
 The caliph (khalifah) is considered the successor to the Prophet Muhammad and serves as
the political and religious leader of the Muslim community (ummah).
 Adherence to Sharia:
 Al-Mawardi emphasizes the importance of governance in accordance with Islamic law
(Sharia) within the Islamic state.
 He argues that rulers and government officials must govern in accordance with the
principles and values of Islam.
 Consultative Governance (Shura):
 While ultimate authority rests with the caliph, rulers are encouraged to seek the advice
and counsel of knowledgeable individuals in matters of state.
 Shura ensures collective decision-making and the participation of qualified advisors in
the governance process.
 Justice and Equity:
 Justice and equity as foundational principles of governance within the Islamic state.
 Rulers are expected to ensure fair and impartial administration of law, protect the rights
of individuals, and promote social justice within society.
 Public Welfare:
 The Islamic state is tasked with promoting the welfare and well-being of its citizens.
 Hierarchy and Authority: Al-Mawardi discusses the hierarchical structure of
governance within the Islamic state, with the caliph at the apex of political authority. He
delineates the roles and responsibilities of various officials and institutions within the
government, emphasizing the importance of maintaining order and stability.
 State Departments
In "Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyyah" (The Ordinances of Government), Al-Mawardi outlines
the various departments or institutions of the Islamic state, which are essential for the
effective administration and governance of society. While the specific structure and
terminology may vary, depending on historical context and regional variations, Al-
Mawardi's discussions typically encompass the following key departments:

Page 11 of 53
 1) The Ruler (Sultan or Caliph): At the apex of the state is the ruler, who may be referred
to as the sultan or caliph. The ruler holds ultimate authority and is responsible for making
executive decisions, enforcing laws, and representing the state domestically and
internationally. The ruler ensures the overall functioning of the government and the well-
being of the society.
2) The Judiciary (Qazi): The judiciary is tasked with interpreting and applying Islamic law
(Sharia) in legal disputes and matters of justice.
3) The Military (Askar): The military is responsible for defending the state, maintaining
security, and safeguarding its territorial integrity. It comprises various branches, including
the army, navy, and air force, as well as specialized units for border defense, law
enforcement, and internal security.
4) Finance and Treasury (Bayt al-Mal): The finance and treasury department manages
state finances, revenue collection, expenditure, and budgetary allocations. It oversees
taxation, public funds, and economic policies aimed at promoting prosperity and
development within the society.
5) Administration (Diwan): The administration department handles the day-to-day affairs
of governance, including bureaucratic functions, record-keeping, correspondence, and
public services. It comprises various ministries, departments, and agencies responsible
for different aspects of governance, such as education, health, infrastructure, and social
welfare.
6) Religious Affairs (Diwan al-Waqf): The religious affairs department oversees religious
institutions, endowments (waqf), and charitable activities within the state. It supports
religious scholars, institutions of learning (madrasas), and mosques, as well as charitable
organizations that provide social services to the community.
7) Foreign Affairs (Wazir al-Kharaj): The foreign affairs department manages diplomatic
relations with other states, negotiates treaties and agreements, and represents the state's
interests on the international stage. It promotes diplomacy, peace, and cooperation while
safeguarding the sovereignty and interests of the state.

Al-Mawardi’s Concept of Imam or Sovereign/ Imamate Theory

Page 12 of 53
Al-Mawardi's concept of the Imam or Sovereign (in Arabic, "Imam" or "Sultan") is central to his
political thought and governance theory, as outlined in his seminal work "Al-Ahkam al-
Sultaniyya wal-Wilayat al-Diniyya" (The Ordinances of Government). Here's an overview of Al-
Mawardi's concept of the Imam:

Legitimacy: Al-Mawardi emphasized the importance of the Imam's legitimacy as the ruler of the
Muslim community. He argued that the Imam must derive his authority from Islamic law
(Sharia) and the consent of the governed. Legitimacy could be established through various
means, including appointment by a previous legitimate Imam, consensus of the people, or
election by a council of qualified individuals.

Qualifications: According to Al-Mawardi, the Imam must possess certain qualifications to be

considered fit for leadership. These qualifications include piety, justice, wisdom, knowledge of
Islamic law, and administrative competence.

Duties and Responsibilities: Al-Mawardi outlined the duties and responsibilities of the Imam in
governing the Muslim community. These include upholding justice, protecting the rights of the
people, maintaining public order and security, providing for the welfare of the citizens, and
promoting the practice of Islam.

Consultation (Shura): Al-Mawardi stressed the importance of consultation (shura) in the

decision-making process of the Imam. While the Imam holds ultimate authority, he should
consult with knowledgeable advisors, scholars, and representatives of the community before
making important decisions. Shura ensures broader participation and enhances the legitimacy of
governance.

Limits of Authority: Although the Imam holds significant authority, Al-Mawardi also
emphasized the limits of his power. The Imam is subject to Islamic law and accountable for his
actions before both God and the people. He must govern justly and refrain from tyranny,
oppression, or actions contrary to Islamic principles.

Al-Mawardi’s Theory of Siyasa

Al-Mawardi's theory of siyasa, as articulated in his seminal work "Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyyah"
(The Ordinances of Government), provides insights into the concept of administrative discretion

Page 13 of 53
within the framework of Islamic governance. Here are key aspects of Al-Mawardi's theory of
siyasa:

Definition and Scope: Al-Mawardi defines siyasa as the discretionary authority vested in rulers
to enact policies and make decisions in matters not explicitly addressed by Islamic law (Sharia).
Siyasa allows rulers to exercise flexibility and adaptability in governance, particularly in
addressing new challenges or circumstances.

Complementary to Sharia: Al-Mawardi emphasizes that siyasa is complementary to Sharia and

should not contradict its principles. While Sharia provides the foundational legal framework for
governance, Siyasa allows rulers to address issues that may not have explicit guidance in
religious texts, while still upholding the overarching objectives of Sharia, such as justice, equity,
and the preservation of public order.

Guiding Principles: According to Al-Mawardi, rulers should exercise siyasa in accordance with
certain guiding principles derived from Islamic ethics and jurisprudence. This includes
considerations of maslaha (public interest), 'adl (justice), and mawarith (precedents or
customs). Rulers are expected to act with wisdom, fairness, and accountability, ensuring that
their decisions serve the best interests of society.

Limits and Constraints: While siyasa grants rulers a degree of discretion, Al-Mawardi
acknowledges certain limits and constraints. Rulers are expected to respect the boundaries set by
Sharia and avoid actions that contravene its principles. Additionally, siyasa should not be used
arbitrarily or for personal gain but should be exercised responsibly and in the service of the
common good.

Role in Governance: Al-Mawardi discusses the role of siyasa in various aspects of governance,
including matters of public administration, taxation, security, and diplomacy. Siyasa allows rulers
to adapt to changing circumstances, address emerging challenges, and promote the welfare and
stability of society.

Theory of Rebelion
 Al-Mawardi, an influential 11th-century Islamic jurist and political theorist, articulated a
comprehensive theory of rebellion in his works.

Page 14 of 53
  He stated that rebellion against a ruler is permissible in a particular situation and under
certain conditions.
Context of Governance
 Al-Mawardi emphasized the importance of stable and just governance for the Islamic
state.
 He believed that the ruler (Caliph or Imam) must uphold Sharia (Islamic law)
 And ensure justice, security, and welfare for the people.
Justification for Rebellion (Specific Situation)
 Oppression and Injustice: Al-Mawardi stated that if a ruler becomes tyrannical,
oppressive, and violates the principles of justice and Sharia, rebellion could be justified.
 Incompetence: If the ruler is unable to fulfill his duties effectively, leading to harm or
neglect of the people's rights, rebellion may be considered.
 Deviance from Sharia: Significant departure from Islamic law and moral corruption are
grounds for challenging the ruler's authority.
Conditions for Rebellion
 Last Resort: Rebellion should be the last resort after all other means of redress have
failed.
 Potential for Success: There must be a reasonable chance of success. A rebellion that
leads to greater chaos and harm than the current regime is not justified.
 Qualified Leadership: The rebellion should be led by qualified, knowledgeable, and
morally upright individuals capable of establishing a just and effective government.
 Public Support: Significant support from the population is essential to legitimize the
rebellion and ensure its success.
Process of Rebellion
 Initial Steps: Initially, peaceful methods such as advice (nasihat) and constructive
criticism should be employed to correct the ruler's actions.
 Escalation: If peaceful methods fail, and the conditions for rebellion are met, organized
resistance may be considered.
 Post-Rebellion Governance: After a successful rebellion, the new leadership must
establish a government based on justice, Sharia, and the welfare of the people, avoiding
the pitfalls of the previous regime.

Al Mawardi: Critique of His Political Philosophy

Al-Mawardi’s political philosophy has faced criticism on several fronts. Critics argue that his
emphasis on a strong central authority may lead to authoritarianism and the concentration of
power in the hands of the Caliph. Additionally, his approach to consultation (shura) is seen by
some as insufficiently democratic, as it primarily involves a select group of scholars and elites.

Page 15 of 53
 ……………….Al-
Ghazali………………
1. Introduction:
 Abu Hamid Muhammad ibn Muhammad al-Ghazali, a Persian philosopher, born in 1058
CE in Tus, Iran, and died in 1111 CE
 His patron, Nizam ul Mulk was murdered in Baghdad, which had impacted his
psychology and so he left the court of Baghdad and wandered Syria, Egypt, Mecca and
Medina, whereas caliphs were mere puppets of Seljuks at that time.
 One of his most works is "The Revival of the Religious Sciences" (Ihya'u Ulum al-Din), a
comprehensive guide to Islamic spirituality and ethical behavior, it helped reinvigorate
Islamic scholarship and spirituality at a time when it was perceived to be in decline
 He went through skepticism and doubt; questioned the foundations of his faith and
eventually experienced a spiritual awakening and returned to a more orthodox
interpretation of Islam. Being ASHARITE, he valued reason and revelation, and the
importance of spiritual purification.
 Believed in destiny and preached strict adherence to the commandments rather than
making new interpretations.
 He is often seen as a bridge figure between the Islamic and Western philosophical
traditions, emphasizing on spiritual introspection and moral development. His works
were translated into Latin during the Middle Ages and had a significant impact on
medieval Christian thinkers such as Thomas Aquinas.

2. Basis of Al Ghazali Political thought:

 Divine sovereignty and Caliphate
 Focus on ethical conduct of rulers; condemning tyranny
 Social justice and the proper governance of society according to Islamic principles.

Page 16 of 53
 Al-Ghazali supports the idea of shura (consultation) as a principle of governance. He
believes that rulers should seek the counsel of knowledgeable and wise individuals.

3. Significance of Al Ghazali Political thought:

 During the time of Al-Ghazali (1058-1111 CE), the Muslim world was undergoing
fragmentation, with various ruling dynasties vying for power. The Abbasid Caliphate,
which had once been the center of Islamic civilization, was in decline, and regional
powers such as the Seljuk, Turks, Fatimids.
 The Muslim world experienced a flourishing of culture, learning, and scholarship during
this period. Cities such as Baghdad, Cairo, Cordoba, and Bukhara were vibrant centers of
intellectual activity
 The period from the 8th to the 13th centuries is often referred to as the Islamic Golden
Age, characterized by significant advancements in various fields of knowledge. Muslim
scholars made important contributions to mathematics, astronomy, medicine, philosophy
 The Muslim world served as a hub for cross-cultural exchange and dialogue during this
period. Scholars translated works from Greek, Persian, Sanskrit, and other languages into
Arabic, facilitating the transmission of knowledge across different civilizations.
 Critique of Philosophy: Al-Ghazali's critique of Greek rationalism, as articulated in
"The Incoherence of the Philosophers" (Tahafut al-Falasifah), had a profound impact on
Islamic philosophy. His arguments challenged the dominance of Aristotelian metaphysics
and highlighted the limitations of human reason in matters of faith and theology.

4. Political Obedience: (same as in basis of thought)

 He believed that obedience to political authority is generally incumbent upon Muslims,
provided that the ruler governs justly and in accordance with Islamic principles.
 Divine sovereignty
 Social Justice
 Accountability
 Shura/Consultative decision-making
 Avoidance of Fitna: Al-Ghazali warned against the dangers of civil strife (fitna) and
social disorder. He cautioned that disobedience or rebellion against political authority
should only be considered in exceptional circumstances, when all other avenues for

Page 17 of 53
 redress have been exhausted and when there is a clear and imminent threat to justice and
the common good.
 Used biological similes-state as the body, king as the heart, minister as commonsense,
police as anger, etc to show the working of state as whole

5. Al Ghazali Classes of Society

 Al-Ghazali, like many scholars of his time, recognized the existence of different classes
within society, reflecting the social structures prevalent in medieval Islamic civilization.
1. Rulers and Administrators: At the top of the social hierarchy were rulers, governors,
and administrators who held political power and authority. These individuals were
responsible for governing society, enforcing laws, and maintaining order.
2. Scholars and Learned Elite: Al-Ghazali held scholars and intellectuals in high regard,
viewing them as guardians of knowledge and guides for the community. This class
included religious scholars (ulema), jurists (fuqaha), theologians (mutakallimun),
philosophers, and scientists.
3. Merchants and Tradespeople: The merchant class, consisting of traders, businessmen,
and artisans, played a crucial role in the economic life of medieval Islamic societies. Al-
Ghazali recognized the importance of honest and ethical conduct in commercial
transactions.
4. Laborers and Workers: This class comprised farmers, laborers, artisans, and other
manual workers who contributed to the production and maintenance of goods and
services. They often worked in agriculture, construction, manufacturing, and other
essential sectors of the economy. Al-Ghazali emphasized the dignity of labor and the
importance of fair compensation for workers
5. The Poor and Vulnerable: Al-Ghazali expressed concern for the welfare of the poor,
needy, and marginalized members of society. He emphasized the importance of charity
(zakat) and social welfare (sadaqah) as means of addressing poverty and alleviating
suffering. He called upon the affluent members of society to fulfill their obligations
toward the less fortunate and to strive for greater social justice and equity.

Page 18 of 53
 6. State-Origin/ Features
State Origin

 Al-Ghazali's theory about the origin of the state suggests that the ideal form of
government is the early Muslim community in Medina, led by the Prophet Muhammad.
 This community was formed through a voluntary agreement (bay'ah) among individuals
to follow a social contract under the Prophet's leadership.
 Muhammad served as both a religious and political leader, guiding the community with
teachings from the Qur'an and his own traditions (Sunnah).
 The state was based on principles of justice, compassion, and consultation (shura) to
ensure the well-being and spiritual health of its people.Features of the State

1. Divine Sovereignty:

 The state is founded on the principle of divine sovereignty, recognizing that ultimate
authority belongs to God alone.
 Rulers derive their legitimacy and authority from God, and they are accountable to Him
for their actions.
2. Justice and Rule of Law:

 A central feature of the state is the promotion of justice and the rule of law.
 Rulers are expected to govern with fairness, equity, and integrity, ensuring that laws are
applied impartially and that the rights of individuals are protected.
3. Consultative Decision-Making:

 The state operates on principles of consultation (shura), whereby rulers seek the counsel
of knowledgeable and wise individuals when making important decisions.
 This fosters inclusivity, participation, and accountability in governance.

4. Protection of Rights:

Page 19 of 53
  The state is responsible for protecting the rights of its citizens, including the right to life,
liberty, and property.
 It ensures that individuals are treated with dignity and respect, and that their freedoms are
safeguarded.
5. Welfare and Social Justice:

 The state has a duty to promote the welfare and well-being of its citizens, particularly the
vulnerable members of society.

 This includes provision of basic services such as education, healthcare, and social
support, as well as addressing inequalities and disparities.
6. Ethical Governance:

 The state operates on ethical principles, with rulers expected to govern with virtue,
compassion, and piety.
 They are encouraged to uphold moral standards and to set an example of righteousness
for the community.
7. Protection and Security:

 The state is responsible for ensuring the safety and security of its citizens, both internally
and externally.
 This includes maintaining law and order, defending against external threats, and
providing for the common defense.
8. Promotion of Public Welfare:

 The state plays a role in promoting the public welfare and fostering economic
development.
 This may involve initiatives to stimulate growth, create employment opportunities, and
alleviate poverty.

Conclusion:

Page 20 of 53
  These features reflect Al-Ghazali's vision of the ideal state, which is characterized by
justice, ethical governance, consultation, and a commitment to the well-being of its
citizens.
 While the specific implementation may vary depending on historical and contextual
factors, these principles provide a normative framework for Islamic governance and
political theory.

7. Qualities of Imam
 In Islamic tradition, an Imam holds a significant position as a spiritual and religious
leader, guiding the community in matters of faith, worship, and ethical conduct.
 Al-Ghazali, as a prominent theologian and jurist, identified several qualities and
characteristics that are desirable in an Imam. These qualities reflect the ideal attributes of
leadership within the Islamic context:
1. Knowledge:

 An Imam should possess deep knowledge of Islamic theology, jurisprudence (fiqh),

Quranic exegesis (tafsir), and the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (Hadith).
 This knowledge equips the Imam to provide guidance to the community on matters of
faith, belief, and practice.
2. Piety and God-consciousness (Taqwa):

 The foremost quality of an Imam is piety and a strong sense of God-consciousness.

 The Imam should be a role model for the community, demonstrating humility, sincerity,
and devotion to God in both words and actions.

3. Integrity and Trustworthiness:

 An Imam should be known for his integrity and trustworthiness.

 He should uphold ethical standards, avoid any form of corruption or misconduct, and act
with honesty and transparency in all dealings.
4. Compassion and Empathy:
Page 21 of 53
  The Imam should demonstrate compassion and empathy towards members of the
community, showing concern for their well-being and providing support to those in need.
 He should be accessible and approachable, offering guidance and counsel with kindness
and understanding.
5. Leadership and Guidance:

 An Imam should possess leadership qualities, including the ability to inspire and motivate
others, to resolve conflicts, and to unite the community around common goals.
 He should provide clear and principled guidance on religious matters, helping individuals
navigate challenges and dilemmas in their spiritual journey.

6. Scholarship and Learning:

 In addition to religious knowledge, an Imam should be committed to lifelong learning

and intellectual growth.
 He should engage in continuous study and reflection, remaining abreast of contemporary
issues and developments relevant to the community.
7. Humility and Open-mindedness:

 Despite his knowledge and authority, an Imam should demonstrate humility and open-
mindedness, recognizing the limitations of human understanding and being receptive to
diverse perspectives and interpretations within Islamic tradition.

8. Service and Dedication:

 An Imam should be dedicated to serving the community selflessly, prioritizing the

welfare and interests of others above his own.
 He should be willing to sacrifice personal comfort and convenience for the greater good
of the community.
Conclusion:

Page 22 of 53
These qualities reflect Al-Ghazali's understanding of the responsibilities and duties of an Imam
as a spiritual guide and leader within the Islamic community. They emphasize the importance of
knowledge, piety, integrity, compassion, and service in fulfilling this noble role.

8. Concept of Justice

Introduction:

 Al-Ghazali's concept of justice is deeply rooted in Islamic theology and ethics, drawing
upon Quranic teachings, prophetic traditions, and principles of moral reasoning.
 Justice, in Al-Ghazali's perspective, encompasses both individual conduct and the
organization of society, reflecting a harmonious balance between rights and
responsibilities, fairness, and equity. Here are key aspects of Al-Ghazali's concept of
justice:

1. Divine Justice:

 Al-Ghazali affirms the divine attribute of justice, emphasizing that God is the ultimate
source and embodiment of justice.
 Divine justice ensures that each individual is held accountable for their actions, and that
all deeds, whether good or bad, will be duly rewarded or punished in the afterlife.
 This belief in divine justice provides a foundation for moral accountability and
encourages individuals to act with righteousness and integrity.
2. Human Responsibility:

 Al-Ghazali emphasizes the importance of human responsibility in upholding justice. He

argues that humans have been endowed with free will and moral agency, enabling them
to distinguish between right and wrong and to act accordingly.
 Individuals are responsible for their actions and are obligated to uphold justice in their
interactions with others.

Page 23 of 53
3. Social Justice:

 Al-Ghazali advocates for social justice as a fundamental principle of Islamic governance.

 He asserts that rulers and leaders have a duty to govern with fairness, equity, and
compassion, ensuring that the rights of all members of society are upheld and protected.
 This includes equitable distribution of wealth, access to resources, and opportunities for
all citizens, regardless of their social status or background.
4. Equality before the Law:

 Al-Ghazali emphasizes the principle of equality before the law, asserting that all
individuals are entitled to equal treatment and protection under the law, regardless of their
social status, ethnicity, or religion.
 He condemns discrimination and oppression, calling for impartiality and fairness in the
administration of justice.
5. Restorative Justice:

 Al-Ghazali advocates for a concept of justice that goes beyond mere punishment and
retribution, emphasizing the importance of restorative justice.
 He believes that justice should aim to reconcile conflicting parties, restore harmony, and
address the underlying causes of injustice.
 This may involve measures such as restitution (restoration/return to proper owner),
rehabilitation, and reconciliation, alongside accountability for wrongdoing.
6. Ethical Conduct:

 Al-Ghazali emphasizes the importance of ethical conduct as a prerequisite for justice.

 He argues that justice cannot be achieved without moral integrity, honesty, and sincerity
in one's intentions and actions.
 Individuals are called upon to cultivate virtues such as compassion, generosity, and
humility, which are essential for the realization of justice in society.

“Al- Ghazzali relates how the Caliph Umar II asked the definition of justice from Muhammad
bin Ka’b of Cordova, to which the savant replied that real justice was dealing with the inferiors

Page 24 of 53
like a father, with superiors like a son and with equals like a brother and to award punishment
only according to the wrong done and the power to bear it”.

Conclusion:

Overall, Al-Ghazali's concept of justice reflects a holistic understanding of morality,

encompassing both individual ethics and societal organization. It emphasizes the divine origins
of justice, human responsibility, social equity, equality before the law, restorative measures, and
ethical conduct as essential components of a just and harmonious society.

9. Theory of Democracy
Al-Ghazali lived in a time long before modern conceptions of democracy emerged. Therefore, he
did not explicitly develop a theory of democracy in the contemporary sense. However, certain
principles within Al-Ghazali's political thought can be interpreted in ways that resonate with
democratic values and institutions. Here are some aspects that might be relevant:

1. Consultation (Shura):

 Al-Ghazali emphasized the importance of consultation (shura) in governance, wherein

rulers seek the advice and input of knowledgeable and wise individuals when making
decisions.
 This principle of collective decision-making shares similarities with democratic ideals of
participatory governance and the importance of public deliberation.
2. Accountability:

 Al-Ghazali believed that rulers are accountable to God and the community for their
actions.
 This concept of accountability aligns with the democratic principle of holding elected
officials answerable to the electorate for their decisions and policies.
3. Justice and Fairness:

Page 25 of 53
  Al-Ghazali advocated for just and equitable governance, wherein rulers are expected to
govern with fairness, uphold the rights of individuals, and ensure the welfare of society as
a whole.
 These principles are foundational to democratic societies, which prioritize the rule of law,
protection of human rights, and social justice.
4. Consent of the Governed:

 While Al-Ghazali did not explicitly discuss the concept of popular sovereignty, his
emphasis on the importance of the well-being and consent of the governed suggests a
recognition of the legitimacy of governance based on the consent of the governed—a
fundamental principle of democracy.
5. Pluralism and Tolerance:

 Al-Ghazali recognized the diversity within Islamic societies and emphasized the
importance of tolerance and respect for differing viewpoints.
 This value is consistent with democratic principles of pluralism, freedom of expression,
and the protection of minority rights.
Conclusion:

While it would be anachronistic to claim that Al-Ghazali articulated a theory of democracy in the
modern sense, his political thought contains elements that resonate with democratic values such
as consultation, accountability, justice, consent of the governed, and pluralism. These principles
offer insights into how Islamic political theory might intersect with democratic ideals and inform
discussions on governance and political reform in contemporary contexts.

10. State Administration

Al-Ghazali's views on state administration were deeply influenced by his understanding of
Islamic governance principles, which emphasize justice, consultation, and ethical conduct. While
he did not provide a detailed blueprint for state administration, his writings contain principles
and insights that can inform our understanding of how governance should be conducted within
an Islamic framework. Here are some key aspects:

1. Justice and Fairness:

Page 26 of 53
  Al-Ghazali emphasized the importance of justice as the cornerstone of governance.
 He believed that rulers should govern with fairness, equity, and impartiality, ensuring
that the rights of individuals are protected and that the law is applied equally to all
members of society.
2. Consultation (Shura):

 Al-Ghazali advocated for rulers to govern through consultation with knowledgeable and
wise individuals.
 This principle of shura ensures that decisions are made with input from diverse
perspectives and that rulers take into account the interests and concerns of the
community.
3. Ethical Conduct:

 Al-Ghazali stressed the importance of ethical conduct among rulers and administrators.
 He believed that leaders should act with integrity, honesty, and sincerity in their dealings
with the people, avoiding corruption, nepotism, and exploitation of power for personal
gain.

4. Public Welfare:

 Al-Ghazali emphasized the duty of rulers to promote the welfare and well-being of the
people.
 This includes providing essential services such as education, healthcare, and
infrastructure, as well as addressing the needs of the poor and vulnerable members of
society.
5. Accountability:

 Al-Ghazali believed that rulers are accountable to God and the community for their
actions.
 He emphasized the importance of transparency, oversight, and accountability
mechanisms to ensure that rulers are held accountable for their decisions and policies.
6. Meritocracy:

Page 27 of 53
  While not explicitly discussed by Al-Ghazali, the principle of meritocracy can be inferred
from his emphasis on consultation and ethical conduct.
 In an ideal Islamic administration, individuals should be appointed to positions of
authority based on their competence, qualifications, and merit, rather than on factors such
as nepotism or favoritism.
7. Unity and Stability:

 Al-Ghazali recognized the importance of maintaining unity and stability within the state.
 He believed that rulers should strive to foster a sense of solidarity among the diverse
members of society and to promote social cohesion through just and equitable
governance.
Conclusion:

Overall, while Al-Ghazali did not provide a detailed treatise on state administration, his
principles of justice, consultation, ethical conduct, and public welfare offer valuable insights into
how governance should be conducted within an Islamic framework. These principles continue to
inform discussions on governance and political reform in contemporary Islamic thought.

……….. Ibn Khaldun ……….

 Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406) was a prominent medieval Arab historian, philosopher, and
scholar of the 14th century.
 Ibn Khaldun is widely regarded as one of the greatest intellectuals of the Islamic Golden
Age and
 a pioneering figure in various fields, including historiography, sociology, economics, and
political theory.
 His most famous work is the "Muqaddimah" (also known as the "Prolegomena" or
"Introduction"), which is considered a foundational text in the fields of historiography
and sociology. In the "Muqaddimah," Ibn Khaldun discusses the rise and fall of
civilizations and proposing a cyclical theory of historical development.
 Ibn Khaldun's approach to history was revolutionary for his time. He emphasized the
importance of empirical evidence and critical analysis, challenging the traditional
accounts of historical events.

Page 28 of 53
Significance of Ibn Khaldun:
 Foundational Work in Historiography: In "Muqaddimah" (Introduction), he laid out a
systematic approach to studying historical events, analyzing the rise and fall of
civilizations, and proposing a cyclical theory of historical development.
 Sociological Insights: Ibn Khaldun is often regarded as a pioneer in sociology due to his
analysis of social phenomena and the dynamics of human societies. He explored concepts
such as group solidarity (asabiyyah), social cohesion, and the impact of political
institutions on society.
 Economic Theory: Ibn Khaldun made significant contributions to economic theory,
particularly in the areas of taxation, trade, and the role of government in economic
development. His insights into the relationship between economic factors and social
organization laid the groundwork for later economic theories.
 Cross-Cultural Influence: His ideas were transmitted to Europe through translations of
his works, influencing Renaissance thinkers and early modern historians. His emphasis
on empirical observation and critical analysis resonated with Enlightenment thinkers and
contributed to the development of modern historical and social sciences.
 Legacy and Reverence: Ibn Khaldun is celebrated as one of the greatest intellectuals of
the Islamic Golden Age. His works continue to be studied and revered by scholars across
various disciplines, including history, sociology, economics, and political science.

Concept of Sovereignty presented by Ibn Khaldun

Ibn Khaldun's concept of sovereignty, as outlined in his work "Muqaddimah" (Introduction),
offers a nuanced perspective on political authority and power dynamics within societies.
While he did not use the term "sovereignty" in the modern sense, his ideas on governance,
legitimacy, and the nature of political authority shed light on this concept.
Legitimacy of Rulers:
 Ibn Khaldun emphasized the importance of legitimacy in governance.
 He argued that the authority of rulers derives from the consent and support of the
governed, rather than from divine right or hereditary privilege.
 According to Ibn Khaldun, rulers gain legitimacy through their ability to provide security,
justice, and public welfare, as well as through their demonstration of competence and
leadership qualities.
Social Contract:

Page 29 of 53
  Ibn Khaldun's political theory is based on a social contract between rulers and
subjects.
 He suggested that rulers are entrusted with political authority by the community in
exchange for protection and the maintenance of order.
 This implies a reciprocal relationship between rulers and governed.
Asabiyyah and Sovereignty:
 Ibn Khaldun's concept of "asabiyyah," or group solidarity, plays a crucial role in his
understanding of political authority.
 He argued that the cohesion and strength of a ruling dynasty depend on the level of
asabiyyah among its members and supporters.
 When a ruling dynasty loses its sense of asabiyyah, its authority weakens, leading to its
decline and eventual replacement by a new dynasty with a stronger sense of group
solidarity.
 In this sense, sovereignty is not solely vested in the ruler but is also contingent upon the
support and cohesion of the ruling elite and the broader society.
Balance of Power: Ibn Khaldun advocated for a balance of power between rulers and governed.

What is theory of Asabiyya

The theory of "asabiyyah," also spelled "asabiyya," is a central concept in Ibn Khaldun's political
thought, outlined in his seminal work, the "Muqaddimah" (Introduction).
Asabiyyah refers to the social cohesion or group solidarity that binds together members
of a community or a ruling elite.
Asabiyya is the psychological state or the degree of consciousness belonging to a group,
tribal or community members which ensure their solidarity.
Ibn Khaldun used this concept to explain the rise and fall of political dynasties and civilizations.

Key aspects of Ibn Khaldun's theory of asabiyyah include:

Importance of Group Solidarity:
o Ibn Khaldun argued that the cohesion and strength of a society or a ruling dynasty
depend on the level of asabiyyah among its members.
o Asabiyyah manifests as a sense of loyalty, mutual support, and shared identity among
individuals within a group.
o It can arise from various sources, including tribal or familial ties, religious affiliation, or
common interests and goals.

Page 30 of 53
Role in Political Dynamics:
 According to Ibn Khaldun, asabiyyah plays a crucial role in the formation and
maintenance of political authority.
 A ruler or ruling dynasty gains legitimacy and stability by harnessing the asabiyyah of its
supporters and allies.
 As long as the ruling elite maintains strong group solidarity and effectively channels the
asabiyyah of the broader society, its authority remains secure.
Interplay with Economic and Social Factors:
o Ibn Khaldun recognized the interconnection between assabiyah, economic factors
and political power.
o He argued that the two factors reinforce each other i.e. assabiyah + strong economy,
based on productive activities such as agriculture and trade, is essential for the stability
and longevity of a dynasty.
o He also discussed the role of taxation, infrastructure, and trade policies in promoting
economic growth and maintaining social cohesion.
Cycle of Dynasties:
 Ibn Khaldun proposed a cyclical theory of political development, suggesting that
societies go through a predictable cycle of rise, peak, and decline.
 He argued that a ruling dynasty starts with a strong sense of group solidarity
(asabiyyah), which enables it to establish power.
 However, over time, the dynasty becomes complacent, leading to its decline and eventual
replacement by a new dynasty with a stronger sense of asabiyyah.
 This theory influenced later thinkers and historians in understanding the patterns of
political change and continuity.

Basis/Sources of Asabiyyah
The basis of "asabiyyah" in Ibn Khaldun's theory lies in the cohesion and solidarity that arise
among individuals within a social group or community.
Tribal or Kinship Ties:
 In traditional societies, tribal or familial connections often serve as the primary basis of
asabiyyah.
 People within the same tribe or extended family share common ancestry, traditions, and
customs, which foster a sense of solidarity and mutual support.
Religious Affiliation:

Page 31 of 53
  Religion can also be a significant source of asabiyyah, particularly in societies where
religious identity plays a central role in social and political life.
 Shared religious beliefs, rituals, and values create a sense of community among believers,
fostering solidarity and cooperation.
Ethnic or Cultural Identity:
 Shared language, history, customs, and traditions can create bonds of solidarity among
individuals who identify with the same ethnic or cultural group.
Common Interests and Goals:
 Asabiyyah can also arise from shared interests, goals, or ideologies that bring people
together around a common cause.
 Whether it's a political movement, social reform effort, or economic enterprise,
individuals who share similar aspirations and objectives may develop a sense of solidarity
and unity in pursuit of their goals.
Leadership and Charisma:
 Effective leadership can play a crucial role in fostering asabiyyah within a group or
community.
 Charismatic leaders who inspire trust, loyalty, and admiration among their followers can
galvanize support and forge strong bonds of solidarity.

Application of Assabiyah
The concept of "asabiyyah," as developed by Ibn Khaldun, has several applications across
different fields, including sociology, political science, history, and anthropology.
Understanding Social Cohesion:
 Asabiyyah provides a framework for understanding the mechanisms of social cohesion
within human societies.
 By examining the factors that contribute to the formation of group solidarity, such as
kinship ties, religious affiliation, and shared interests.
Analyzing Political Movements:
 Asabiyyah can help explain the emergence and dynamics of political movements,
including revolutions, nationalist movements, and social protests.
 By examining the role of leadership, ideology, and collective identity in mobilizing
supporters.
Assessing State Stability:

Page 32 of 53
  Asabiyyah can be used to assess the stability and resilience of states and political
systems.
 States with high levels of social cohesion and strong asabiyyah are more likely to
withstand internal and external challenges, maintain political order, and sustain long-term
stability.
Explaining Historical Change:
 Asabiyyah offers insights into the rise and fall of civilizations and political dynasties.
Promoting Social Integration:
 Asabiyyah can inform efforts to promote social integration and cohesion in diverse
societies.
Managing Conflict:
 Asabiyyah can also be applied to conflict resolution and peacebuilding efforts.

Institutional Strength
 The strength of any institution is dependent on its asabiyya.
 The strong asabiyya in any institution fosters better communication, coordination and
group solidarity. Its individuals own their institutional identity and work together for the
common goals.

Stages of State Development presented by Khaldun

Nomadic Stage (Bedouin):
 According to Ibn Khaldun, the earliest stage of state development is characterized by
nomadic or tribal societies.
 In this stage, people live in small, kin-based groups, such as tribes or clans, and rely on
pastoralism, hunting, and gathering for sustenance.
 Political authority is decentralized, with leadership based on tribal or familial ties.
 Asabiyyah, or group solidarity, is strong, and conflicts often arise between rival tribes
over resources and territory.
Sedentary Stage (Agricultural):
 As societies transition from nomadic to sedentary lifestyles, they enter the agricultural
stage of state development.
 Settlements and agricultural communities emerge, leading to the development of
permanent structures, such as cities and irrigation systems.
 Economic specialization increases, with some individuals engaging in farming, trade,
craftsmanship, or administration.

Page 33 of 53
  Political authority becomes more centralized, with the rise of ruling elites,
bureaucracies, and systems of governance.
Urbanization and Empire Building:
 In this stage, urban centers grow in size and complexity, becoming hubs of trade,
commerce, and cultural exchange.
 Empires begin to form as powerful rulers consolidate control over large territories
through conquest, diplomacy, or alliances.
 Imperial bureaucracies are established to administer vast domains, collect taxes, and
maintain order.
 Asabiyyah among ruling elites and military forces plays a crucial role in the expansion
and maintenance of empires.
Decay and Decline:
 Ibn Khaldun argued that empires inevitably face decay and decline. Over time, ruling
elites become corrupt, complacent, and detached from the needs of their subjects.
 Asabiyyah weakens, leading to internal divisions, social unrest, and rebellions.
 External pressures, such as invasions or economic crises, further contribute to the decline
of empires.
 Eventually, the empire collapses, paving the way for the rise of new dynasties and the
cycle begins anew.

Kinds of Government
Ibn Khaldun provided insights into various forms of government and political systems in his
work "Muqaddimah" (Introduction). He categorized governments based on their structures,

Page 34 of 53
forms of governance, and modes of political authority. Here are some of the key government
systems and types discussed by Ibn Khaldun:
Monarchy (Sultanate): Monarchy, or sultanate, is a form of government in which political
authority is vested in a single ruler, such as a king, sultan, or emperor.
Aristocracy (Oligarchy): Aristocracy, or oligarchy, is a form of government in which political
power is concentrated in the hands of a privileged elite, such as nobles, aristocrats, or
oligarchs.
Democracy (Republic): Democracy, or republic, is a form of government in which political
authority is derived from the consent of the governed, and power is exercised by elected
representatives or through direct participation by citizens.
Despotism (Tyranny): Despotism, or tyranny, is a form of government characterized by
oppressive rule, arbitrary exercise of power, and disregard for the rights and freedoms of
the people.
Anarchy (Lawlessness): Anarchy, or lawlessness, represents a state of disorder and chaos in
which there is a lack of effective government and governance. In such conditions, individuals
and groups may resort to violence, lawlessness, and self-interest, leading to social breakdown
and insecurity.

……………. MIDTERM ……………

Islamic Concept of The State

Introduction:
The Islamic concept of the state is rooted in the teachings of Islam as presented in the Quran and
the Sunnah (traditions of Prophet Muhammad). Various perspectives exist on what constitutes an
Islamic state, and these perspectives have evolved over time, leading to different interpretations
and applications in different regions.
Theocracy: Some scholars argue for an Islamic state that adheres strictly to Sharia (Islamic
law) in all aspects of governance. In this perspective, the state is seen as a theocracy, where
religious leaders have a significant role in shaping and implementing laws. Iran is an example of
a country that has implemented a form of theocratic government.
Islamic Governance within a Democratic Framework: Another perspective suggests that
Islam is compatible with democratic principles, emphasizing the importance of consultation
(shura) and consensus-building. This view argues for a state that respects individual rights and

Page 35 of 53
freedoms within the framework of Islamic values. Turkey and Indonesia are examples of
countries where this perspective has influenced governance.
Secular-Islamic Synthesis: Some argue for a synthesis of secular and Islamic principles,
advocating for a state that recognizes the diversity of its population and accommodates various
religious and cultural practices. This perspective aims to strike a balance between Islamic values
and modern governance structures.
Pan-Islamism: There are perspectives that go beyond the boundaries of individual nation-states,
advocating for a unified Islamic state or a confederation of Islamic states. This idea is often
associated with the concept of a caliphate, although interpretations vary widely.
Civic Nationalism: 1Some argue for a state that prioritizes civic nationalism over religious
identity. This perspective emphasizes equal citizenship for all, regardless of religious
background, fostering a sense of national unity that goes beyond religious affiliations.
Reformist Perspectives: Reformist scholars may advocate for adapting Islamic principles to
contemporary contexts, recognizing the need for social, political, and economic reforms. This
perspective seeks to reinterpret certain aspects of Islamic law to address modern challenges.
It's important to note that there is no single, universally accepted model of an Islamic state.
Different Muslim-majority countries have implemented various systems influenced by historical,
cultural, and political factors. Additionally, within each perspective, there are further variations
in how these ideas are applied in practice. The Islamic concept of the state is a complex and
dynamic topic, subject to ongoing debates and discussions within the Muslim world.

Muslim political thinkers

Muslim political thinkers throughout history have contributed diverse perspectives on the
Islamic concept of the state. These thinkers have drawn upon Islamic teachings, historical
precedents, and contemporary challenges to develop their ideas. Here are some notable Muslim
political thinkers and their views on the Islamic concept of the state:
Ibn Taymiyyah (1263-1328):
Perspective: Ibn Taymiyyah was a medieval Islamic scholar who emphasized the importance of
implementing Sharia (Islamic law) in its purest form. He argued for a strong Islamic state
governed by a just ruler who upholds Islamic principles and protects the welfare of the people.
Al-Farabi (872-950):
Perspective: Al-Farabi, a philosopher and political theorist, contributed to the understanding of
the ideal state in Islam. He believed in a virtuous city-state led by a philosopher-king who

1
Civic nationalism, also known as democratic nationalism and liberal nationalism, is a form of nationalism that
adheres to traditional liberal values of freedom, tolerance, equality, individual rights and is not based
on ethnocentrism

Page 36 of 53
embodies wisdom and justice. Al-Farabi's ideas influenced later Muslim and non-Muslim
philosophers.
Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406):
Perspective: Ibn Khaldun, a historian and sociologist, explored the rise and fall of states in his
work "Muqaddimah." He highlighted the importance of group solidarity (Asabiyyah) and the
role of dynamic social forces in shaping the strength and stability of a state. His ideas had a
significant impact on political sociology.
Sayyid Qutb (1906-1966):
Perspective: Sayyid Qutb, an Egyptian Islamist, was a key figure in the development of modern
Islamic political thought. He critiqued what he perceived as the secularization of Muslim
societies and called for the establishment of an Islamic state based on Sharia. His ideas
influenced the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist movements.
Abul A'la Maududi (1903-1979):
Perspective: Abul A'la Maududi, a Pakistani Islamic scholar and founder of Jamaat-e-Islami,
advocated for the establishment of an Islamic state governed by Sharia. He emphasized the
concept of sovereignty of Allah and argued for the integration of all aspects of life under
Islamic principles.
Rached Ghannouchi (b. 1941):
Perspective: Rached Ghannouchi, a Tunisian political thinker and leader of the Ennahda
Movement, has promoted the idea of an inclusive and democratic Islamic state. He has
argued for the compatibility of Islamic values with democratic governance and has advocated for
political pluralism and civic engagement.
Tariq Ramadan (b. 1962):
Perspective: Tariq Ramadan, a Swiss Islamic scholar and philosopher, has explored the
compatibility of Islamic principles with modern Western societies. He advocates for a
dynamic interpretation of Islam, emphasizing justice, human rights, and civic engagement within
the framework of pluralistic democracies.
Mohammad Hashim Kamali (b. 1944):
Perspective: Mohammad Hashim Kamali, an Afghan-born Islamic scholar, has contributed to the
discourse on Islamic law and governance. He emphasizes the adaptability of Islamic legal
principles to modern contexts and promotes the idea of a constitutional state that upholds
justice and human rights.
These thinkers represent a range of perspectives on the Islamic concept of the state, reflecting the
diversity of thought within the Muslim world. The interpretations vary based on historical,
cultural, and political contexts, and ongoing discussions continue to shape contemporary
understandings of Islam and governance.

Page 37 of 53
Islam & Islamic Polity:
Nature of Islamic sphere of Theocracy-Democratic ideals
Introduction:
 “Islam and Islamic polity refer to the relationship between the religion of Islam and the
political systems and structures that govern Muslim societies”.
 Islam is not just a spiritual or personal belief system; it also provides guidance on matters of
governance, law, and social organization.
 The term "Islamic polity" encompasses the ways in which political authority and
institutions are informed by Islamic principles.

Key aspects of Islam and Islamic polity:

1) The Quran and Sunnah: The Quran, Islam's holy book, and the Sunnah (traditions) of
the Prophet Muhammad serve as the primary sources of guidance for Muslims.
They provide principles for personal conduct, social relations, and governance.

2) Caliphate: Historically, the caliphate represented the political and religious leadership
in Islam. The caliphs were considered successors to Prophet Muhammad and were
expected to govern according to Islamic principles.
However, the caliphate system evolved over time & defected from original governance.
3) Sharia: Sharia, or Islamic law, plays a crucial role in Islamic polity. It encompasses a
wide range of legal, ethical, and moral principles derived from the Quran and Sunnah.
Islamic states often incorporate elements of Sharia into their legal systems, influencing
family law, criminal law, and other aspects of governance.

4) Political Diversity: Muslim-majority countries exhibit a wide range of political systems,

from monarchies and republics to theocratic or hybrid systems. The diversity reflects
different interpretations of Islamic principles and the influence of historical, cultural,
and geopolitical factors.

5) Concept of Ummah: The concept of Ummah refers to the global community of

Muslims. There is a sense of solidarity among Muslims transcending national
boundaries. This concept influences diplomatic and political relations within the
Muslim world.

Page 38 of 53
 6) Consultation (Shura): The Quran emphasizes the importance of Shura, or
consultation, in decision-making. Some see this principle as aligning with democratic
ideals, as it involves seeking the input of the community in political matters.
7) Human Rights and Justice: Islam places a strong emphasis on justice, equality, and
the protection of human rights. Islamic polity aims to establish just and equitable
societies that uphold the dignity and rights of individuals.

Contemporary Challenges:
1) challenges in reconciling traditional Islamic teachings with the demands of modern
governance.
2) Secularism vs. Sharia
3) Nationalism vs. Ummah
4) Diversity in Islamic interpretations

Islam & its Relationship between Theocracy & Democracy:

The nature of the Islamic sphere in terms of theocracy and its compatibility with
democratic ideals is a complex and debated topic. It involves examining how Islamic principles
and governance structures align with or differ from democratic values. Here are key points to
consider:
1) Theocratic Elements in Islam: Theocracy refers to a system of government where religious
leaders or institutions hold political power.
In Islamic history, the caliphate represented a theocratic form of governance, where the
political and religious leadership were often intertwined.
2) Islamic Democracy vs. Liberal Democracy: Islamic political thought may differ from the
Western liberal democratic model. While Islam emphasizes justice, accountability, and the
protection of rights, the interpretation and application of these principles can vary. Some
argue for an Islamic democracy that incorporates Islamic values within a democratic
framework, while others may advocate for a more theocratic approach.

THE CONCEPT OF ISLAMIC STATE

 Foundation of Islamic State

Page 39 of 53
  Mode of Life and Community Obligations
 Principles of Islamic State
 Structure of Islamic State
 Consultation and Decision Making
 Distinctions from Secular State
 Evolution of Leadership
 Critique of Monarchy
EVOLUTION OF ISLAMIC GOVERNANCE
 Introduction
 Selection of the First Caliph (Abubakr)
 Appointment of the Second Caliph (Umar)
 Succession of the Third Caliph (Uthman)
 Appointment of Muawiyah and Dynastic Succession
 Transformation of the Caliphate
 Post-Caliphate Period
 Role of Turkey and Modern Governance

ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF THE DEMOCRATIC METHOD

 Creation of a Representative Body
 Adaptation of Majority Principle
 Evolution of Methodology
 Role of Education
 Formation of Political Parties
CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS
 Conflict in Viewpoints
 Fundamental Principles
 Guaranteeing Rights
 Legislative Authority
 Role of Ulema
 Presidential vs. Parliamentary Democracy
 Conclusion

1. THE CONCEPT OF ISLAMIC STATE

Foundation of Islamic State
 Authority vests in Allah alone.
 Obedience to Allah's commands is paramount.
 Law is derived from the Qur'an and Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).
 Promotion of good and suppression of evil are fundamental principles.
Mode of Life and Community Obligations
 Muslims are commanded to obey Allah, the Prophet, and those in authority, conditional on
adherence to Islamic principles.
 Muslim community obligated to establish politically and economically free states.
 Patriotism based on attachment to Islamic ideals rather than territorial allegiance.

Page 40 of 53
Principles of Islamic State
 State aims for happiness in both worldly and spiritual aspects.
 Founded on principles of equality, solidarity, and freedom.
 Emphasizes Muslim community (Milla), Islamic law (Shariah), and Headship of the Muslim
community (Khalifa).
Structure of Islamic State
 Sovereignty lies with Allah, with executive and judiciary as main organs.
 Legislature not primary as laws are already established by Allah.
 Head of state executes laws and may make subordinate legislation guided by Islamic principles.
Consultation and Decision Making
 Consultation emphasized in Quranic verses.
 Head of state advised to consult, but not bound by advice.
 Descriptive verses depict consultation as integral to Muslim community's nature.
Distinctions from Secular State
 Islamic state governed by Allah's laws, not human-made laws.
 Not fully sovereign, national, or territorial in Western terms.
 Aspires to be universal but begins as a territorial state.
Evolution of Leadership
 No specific method prescribed for appointing or deposing Khalifa.
 Evolution of structures based on necessity and community consensus.
 Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) did not nominate a successor, leaving the process open for
adaptation.
Critique of Monarchy
 Monarchy not explicitly approved in Quran, consultation emphasized.
 Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) did not claim kingship, emphasized consultation in governance.
 Establishment of Islamic state in Medina based on contractual agreement and consultation with
companions.

2. EVOLUTION OF ISLAMIC GOVERNANCE

Introduction
 During the era of the first Four Rightly Guided Caliphs (632 AD to 661 AD), various methods
were employed for appointing the Khalifa.
 The appointment required confirmation by the Muslim community through bayah (consent).
Selection of the First Caliph (Abubakr)
 After the death of the Prophet, different political groups in Medina vied for power.

Page 41 of 53
  Ultimately, Abubakr was proposed by Umar and accepted as the Head of State through bayah.
Appointment of the Second Caliph (Umar)
 Umar was nominated by Abubakr, with the nomination confirmed by public referendum and
bayah.
 Before his death, Umar established an electoral college to select his successor, eventually leading
to the appointment of Uthman.
Succession of the Third Caliph (Uthman)
 Uthman's succession was marked by consultation among a council of potential candidates, with
the majority supporting Uthman.
Appointment of Muawiyah and Dynastic Succession
 Muawiyah's appointment marked a departure, with his son Yazid being nominated as successor,
setting a precedent for dynastic succession.
 This dynastic trend continued, leading to the introduction of kingly prerogatives and Arabic as the
court language.
Transformation of the Caliphate
 Over time, the Caliphate transitioned from a republican to a hereditary monarchy due to socio-
political conditions and the threat of civil strife.
 Muslim jurists rationalized these changes to maintain the Islamic character of the community.
Post-Caliphate Period
 After the fall of the Abbasid Caliphate in 1258 AD, various rulers controlled specific territories
without adopting the title of Caliph.
 The modern revival of Islam saw the emergence of Muslim national states, some adopting
hereditary monarchy while others formed legislative assemblies.
Role of Turkey and Modern Governance
 Turkey abolished the Caliphate in 1924 and proposed governance through elected assemblies.
 The democratic method adopted in some Muslim countries is seen as imperfect, with debates on
its compatibility with Islamic principles.

3. ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF THE DEMOCRATIC METHOD

Creation of a Representative Body

Establishing a Body of Persons through elected representatives to manage the affairs of the Muslim
community through mutual consultation is necessary.
Adaptation of Majority Principle
While not explicitly forbidden by the Qur'an and Sunnah, the adaptation of the majority principle is seen
as permissible and necessary for evolving methods to enforce Islamic law.

Page 42 of 53
Evolution of Methodology
Islam allows flexibility in evolving suitable methods for realizing its objectives, including the
enforcement of Shariah law.
Role of Education
Success of democracy depends on an educated electorate conscious of their rights and obligations under
Islamic law, ensuring the election of competent leaders.
Formation of Political Parties
Political parties adhering to Islamic ideology can function within the framework of an Islamic state,
promoting good and suppressing evil.

4. CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS

Conflict in Viewpoints
The clash between Western and Islamic forms of democracy poses challenges, sometimes leading to
political breakdowns and military dictatorships.
Fundamental Principles
An Islamic state must adhere to principles of ultimate sovereignty in Allah and supremacy of Islamic law,
but it's not a theocracy.
Guaranteeing Rights
Ensuring the rights of Allah and men, including life, freedom, equality, and protection against abuse of
power, is imperative. Independence of judiciary is crucial for upholding Islamic law.

Legislative Authority
The legislature's authority is delegated and must operate within Qur'anic and Sunnah limits, enjoining
universally acknowledged moral values.
Role of Ulema
Constitutional devices like Ulema committees within the assembly or advisory councils outside can
mitigate errors in interpreting Islamic law in legislative activities.
Presidential vs. Parliamentary Democracy
Both forms of democracy can align with Islamic principles as long as the supremacy of Islamic law is
upheld.
Conclusion
The enforcement of Islamic law can be achieved through various constitutional structures, with
sovereignty ultimately resting with Allah. Flexibility is key, allowing adaptation to changing
circumstances while upholding the core principles of Islam.

Page 43 of 53
Difference between Western and Islamic
Concept of State

Outline
 Introduction
 Nature and concept of state
 Sovereignty
 Origin
 Law
 Rights
 Relationship of religion and politics
 Purpose
 Caliphate
 Obedience
 Worldly isms
 Democratic spirit

Introduction
 The Western concept of the state emphasizes the importance of individual rights, civil
liberties, democracy, and the rule of law.
 In contrast, the Islamic concept of the state is based upon the teachings of the Quran and
the Sunnah, which emphasize the Islamic faith and values, and the sovereignty of Allah.
 Islamic law, known as the Sharia, is used to define the responsibilities of citizens and the
duties of rulers.
 Islamic law also seeks to ensure justice and promote social welfare, but it does so through
a different set of principles than those used in the Western conception of the state

Nature and Concept of State:

 The Islamic State has been based on three main principles, i.e., Towhid (Oneness of
Allah), Risalat (Last prophethood And Messenger of Allah) and Khalifa (The ruler on
earth).
 There are Divine limits in the Holy Quran, which has been sent to this world through
Risalat. And which has been interpreted through the deeds and sayings of the Holy
Prophet.

Page 44 of 53
  Man is Allah’s vicegerent (Khalifa) on earth and is to impose the Divine commandments,
Hadiths, and Sunnah impartially.
 On the other hand, the western concept of the state is entirely different. Its creation is
rational to solve worldly differences among people and their collective problems.

Sovereignty

 The main difference between the Islamic and Western states is the possession of
sovereign powers.
 The western state comprises four elements: area, population, government and
sovereignty. The western state is sovereign, i.e., not subject to any external checks and
orders.
 On the contrary, the Islamic State comprises three elements, i.e., area, population and
government, while sovereignty belongs to Allah.
 It is often criticized that the state has no will in the Islamic state, but certain Divine
Limits (Hadoods), Sunnah, Hadiths and Fiqah have confined its freedom.
 This view is incorrect. If there is a hilly zigzag road, we see certain barrier walls on the
other side of the road that do not obstruct the passage but make the passengers safe.

Origin:

 In the Holy Quran, there are numerous examples of the Islamic State, i.e., the states
formed by Hazrat Joseph, Hazrat David, Hazrat Solomon, Hazrat Moses and Hazrat
Muhammad (PBUH).
 All Muslim political philosophers believe that the present concept of the Islamic state
originates in Medina, where the Holy Prophet established the Islamic state.
 Masjid-I-Nabavi was its secretariat. The state was strengthened and expanded to its
zenith by the Khulafa-I-Rashideen (The Pious caliphs).
 There are different views about the origin of the Western state. It was a city-state, then a
kingdom, empire, feudal state and now a ‘nation-state.’

Law:

 Western law is a rule that is made, executed and adjudicated by the competent authorities.
And this is to regulate the worldly affairs of the people.
 Its sources are customs, comments of jurists, judicial decisions, religion and legislatures
etc.
 On the other hand, Islamic law is the system of rights and duties that enable people to
spend their honorable lives and prepare themselves for eternal life after their demise.
 Its sources are the Holy Quran, Hadiths and Sunnah of the Holy Prophet, Ijtihad, Ijma
and Qiyas etc.
 The nature of legislature and legislation is also different in the concepts.

Page 45 of 53
  In the Islamic state, the legislature is called ‘Shoora,’ comprised of very learned
representatives.
 In the Islamic system, the legislature will enact rules for implementing the Divine
commandments and other Shariah laws while making laws within the limits of Shariah.
 In the western states, the law-making powers varies from state to state.

Rights:

 The western state announces a man-made list of human rights, while in Islam, human
rights are explained by the Holy Quran, and the last address of the Holy Prophet is a
universal charter of human rights.
 Another difference is the nature of women’s rights. The western state gives equal status
to males and females, while in Islam, males dominate.

Relationship of Religion and Politics:

 The Western state has been based on secularism, which means the separation of religion
and politics. Politics and religion have not been separated only, but religion has been
subordinated to politics.
 On the other side, the Islamic state discards the concept of secularism.
 Islam is a complete code of life (Deen) dealing with all aspects of human life. So, Islam
not only keeps welded the two but subordinates politics to religion.

Purpose:

 The most fundamental objective and functions of an Islamic State include the protection
of Deen and the enforcement of the commandments of Shariah.
 Deen is an end, and the state is a means to achieve it. Any political activity, which has no
relevance to Deen, is not acceptable to Islamic polity.
 The original purpose of the western state was to ensure defense (internal and external),
but now its functions have multiplied, and the state has converted into a welfare state.
 The Islamic welfare state is bound not only to protect the people’s lives, property and
honor but also to be on guard against Un-Islamic beliefs to raise the people’s moral
standards.

Caliphate:

 Islam presents a system of caliphate-the vicegerent of Allah on earth.

 The Caliph is to work within the prescribed limits of Shariah. In Islam, a ruler is one
from amongst the Muslims and is a servant of the people.
 He should take his office as a trust from Allah for which he is answerable before Him and
the people.

Page 46 of 53
  On the other hand, in the Western state, there are various systems for appointing and
removing rulers.

Obedience

 In Islamic polity, its entire people are bound to obey the ruler. If the ruler ignores
Shariah, people are allowed to depose the ruler.
 A criterion for obedience is that the ruler must work according to the provisions of
Shariah.
 In the western concept of state, the criteria for obeying the rulers vary from state to state.

Worldly Isms:

 The western states have been based on different ideologies. Modern nationalism,
radicalism and sectarianism are alien to human solidarity and are the greatest hurdle in
uniting people.
 If the unifying force of Deen is excluded from the state’s body politic, it will give way to
economic and political differences and disputes.
 Allama Iqbal, in a radio broadcast speech, condemned the worldly isms. According to
Allama Iqbal, disturbance and deterioration in human societies are because of worldly
doctrines. He says the only ism is Islamism.

Democratic Spirit and Concept of State:

 In Western democracy, the people are sovereign: in Islam, sovereignty is vested in Allah,
and the people are His caliphs or representatives.
 According to the Western concept, the people make their own; in Islam, they have to
follow and obey the laws given by Allah through His Prophet.
 In one, the government undertakes to fulfill the people’s will; in the other, the
government and the people have to fulfill the will of Allah.
 Islam believes in limited democracy, while the west advocates imprisoned democracy.
Islam stresses the qualities of the voters and candidates, while in the western concept, all
people with nominal qualities can vote and contest elections.

PAN-ISLAMISM
Introduction

Basis of Pan-Islamism

Page 47 of 53
  Islamic Identity
 Unity of the Muslim Ummah
 Opposition to Colonialism and Imperialism
 Social Justice and Reform
 Islamic Governance
 Cultural and Educational Revival
 Resistance to Secularism

Evolution of Pan Islamism

 Late 19th Century: Intellectual Roots

 Early 20th Century: Ottoman Caliphate and World War I
 Post-World War I: Decline and Secularism
 Mid-20th Century: Anti-Colonial Movements
 Late 20th Century: Islamic Revival
 Late 20th to Early 21st Century: Transnational Movements
 Contemporary Period: Varied Perspectives

Key Proponents of Pan Islamism

 Jamal al-Din al-Afghani (1838–1897)

 Muhammad Abduh (1849–1905)
 Rashid Rida (1865–1935
 Ismail Gaspirali (1851–1914)
 Hassan al-Banna (1906–1949
 Abul Ala Maududi (1903–1979)

Criticism of Pan Islamism

 Lack of Practicality
 Political Manipulation
 Secular Opposition
 Divisions within the Muslim World
 Historical Failures
 Potential for Extremism
 Incompatibility with Pluralism

Pan-Islamism
Introduction
Pan-Islamism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for the unity and cooperation
of Muslims worldwide, transcending national, ethnic, racial, and linguistic boundaries.

Page 48 of 53
The term "Pan-Islamism" is derived from "Pan," meaning all or universal, and "Islam," referring
to the religion followed by Muslims.
The core idea behind Pan-Islamism is the belief in a shared Islamic identity and a desire to
promote solidarity among Muslims. Advocates of Pan-Islamism often emphasize the
importance of a united political and socio-economic front to address common challenges faced
by the Muslim community globally.

Foundational Principles of Pan-Islamism

The basis of Pan-Islamism lies in the idea of unity and solidarity among Muslims across the
world, transcending national, ethnic, and linguistic boundaries. Several key principles and beliefs
form the foundation of Pan-Islamism:
1. Islamic Identity: Muslims share a common identity based on their adherence to Islam. This
shared identity works as a unifying force that should take precedence over national or ethnic
affiliations.
2. Unity of the Muslim Ummah: Pan-Islamism advocates for the unity of the Muslim
community or Ummah. The concept envisions Muslims working together to address common
challenges, promote mutual support, and uphold Islamic values and principles.
3. Opposition to Colonialism and Imperialism: Historical developments, including the decline
of the Ottoman Empire and the era of European colonialism in the Muslim world, significantly
influenced the emergence of Pan-Islamism. Advocates sought to resist foreign domination and
promote independence and self-determination for Muslim-majority regions.
4. Social Justice and Reform: Proponents may advocate for economic equity, the elimination of
corruption, and the implementation of Islamic law as a means of achieving a just and equitable
society.
5. Islamic Governance: Some proponents of Pan-Islamism advocate for the establishment of an
Islamic state or a Caliphate as a political entity that would unite and govern the Muslim world
based on Islamic principles. The form and structure of this governance can vary among different
Pan-Islamist thinkers and groups.
6. Cultural and Educational Revival: Pan-Islamism often includes a focus on the revival of
Islamic culture, education, and civilization. Advocates may emphasize the importance of
preserving and promoting Islamic heritage while also adapting to modern challenges in a way
that aligns with Islamic values.
7. Resistance to Secularism: Many Pan-Islamist thinkers oppose secular ideologies and
systems, arguing that Islam should play a central role in shaping the political, social, and legal
structures of Muslim societies. They view secularism as a potential threat to the integrity of
Islamic principles

Page 49 of 53
Evolution of Pan Islamism
The evolution of Pan-Islamism can be traced through several historical phases, marked by
changing political, social, and economic contexts. Here is a broad overview of the development
of Pan-Islamism over time:
1. Late 19th Century: Intellectual Roots
The intellectual foundations of Pan-Islamism can be seen in the writings and ideas of Muslim
thinkers such as Jamal al-Din al-Afghani and Muhammad Abduh during the late 19th century.
The decline of the Ottoman Empire and the increasing influence of European colonial
powers in the Muslim world prompted these thinkers to advocate for a unified response among
Muslims.
2. Early 20th Century: Ottoman Caliphate and World War I
During World War I, the Ottoman Caliph, Sultan Mehmed V, issued a call for jihad (holy war)
against the Allied powers, hoping to rally Muslims against their common enemies.
3. Post-World War I: Decline and Secularism
The defeat of the Ottoman Empire and the abolition of the Caliphate by Mustafa Kemal
Atatürk in 1924 marked a significant setback for Pan-Islamism. It shifted the focus away from
Pan-Islamic ideals, as new government’s prioritized secular governance.
4. Mid-20th Century: Anti-Colonial Movements
Pan-Islamic sentiments experienced a revival during the mid-20th century as many Muslim-
majority countries gained independence from colonial rule.Leaders like Gamal Abdel Nasser of
Egypt and Sukarno of Indonesia, though more inclined towards Arab nationalism and non-
alignment, sometimes invoked Pan-Islamic rhetoric.
5. Late 20th Century: Islamic Revival
The late 20th century saw a resurgence of Islamic identity and activism, often associated with the
Islamic revival or Islamic Awakening. The Iranian Revolution of 1979 and the rise of political
Islam in various forms, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, contributed to renewed interest in Pan-
Islamic ideas.
6. Late 20th to Early 21st Century: Transnational Movements
The emergence of transnational Islamist movements, such as Al-Qaeda and later ISIS,
demonstrated a different manifestation of Pan-Islamic aspirations, emphasizing the need for a
global Islamic state (caliphate).Political events, such as the Soviet-Afghan War and conflicts in
the Middle East, contributed to the complex and multifaceted nature of Pan-Islamic movements.
7. Contemporary Period: Varied Perspectives

Page 50 of 53
Pan-Islamism today exists in various forms, ranging from moderate political expressions to
more radical interpretations. Some Islamist political parties advocate for increased cooperation
among Muslim nations, while others with a more militant stance seek the establishment of a
unified Islamic state.

Key Proponents of Pan Islamism

1. Jamal al-Din al-Afghani (1838–1897): Often regarded as the "Father of Pan-Islamism," al-
Afghani was a prominent intellectual and political activist in the late 19th century. He traveled
extensively throughout the Muslim world, advocating for the unity of Muslims against
colonial powers and emphasizing the need for Islamic reform.He was critical of both Western
colonial powers and what he saw as the corrupt and stagnant governments of Muslim-majority
countries. Afghani's vision of Pan-Islamism was not necessarily about establishing a single
centralized state but rather fostering solidarity among Muslims and promoting Islamic
principles in governance.
2. Muhammad Abduh (1849–1905): A close associate of Jamal al-Din al-Afghani, Abduh was
an Egyptian Islamic jurist, scholar, and reformer. He played a key role in the intellectual
development of Pan-Islamist thought, focusing on modernization within an Islamic
framework and promoting unity among Muslims.
Abduh's idea of Pan-Islamism was rooted in the belief that Muslims around the world should
unite politically, socially, and economically to confront the challenges posed by colonialism,
imperialism, and Western domination.
3. Rashid Rida (1865–1935): An influential disciple of Muhammad Abduh, Rida continued
the Pan-Islamist legacy. He was an Islamic scholar and reformer who founded the journal "al-
Manar." Rida believed in the unity of the Muslim ummah (community) across geographical and
political boundaries. His concept of Pan-Islamism aimed to foster solidarity among Muslims
worldwide, transcending national, ethnic, and sectarian divisions. He saw Pan-Islamism as a
means to counter the fragmentation and weakness of the Muslim world in the face of Western
imperialism.
4. Ismail Gaspirali (1851–1914): A Crimean Tatar intellectual and activist, Gaspirali promoted
Pan-Islamism as a means of solidarity among Turkic-speaking Muslims. He advocated for
modernization, education, and cooperation among Muslim communities.Gaspirali's concept of
Pan-Islamism was not necessarily rooted in political unity but rather in cultural and
educational solidarity among Muslims. He advocated for the modernization and educational
advancement of Muslim societies, believing that through education and cultural exchange,
Muslims could regain their past glory and compete with Western powers.

Page 51 of 53
Hassan al-Banna (1906–1949): Founder of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt in 1928, al-
Banna aimed to promote Islamic principles in society and politics. Al-Banna's idea of Pan-
Islamism was rooted in his belief in the unity of the Muslim ummah (community) and the need
for Muslims to support and assist each other regardless of their geographic location.
Abul Ala Maududi (1903–1979): A Pakistani Islamic scholar and founder of the Jamaat-e-
Islami, Maududi emphasized the establishment of an Islamic state based on Islamic law. His
ideas influenced various Islamic movements in South Asia and beyond.
Maududi's conception of Pan-Islamism revolves around the idea of a unified Islamic community
(Ummah) transcending national boundaries and political divisions. He emphasized the need
for Muslims to unite under a single political and ideological framework to address the challenges
facing the Muslim world, including colonialism, secularism, and Western influence.

Criticism of Pan Islamism

Pan-Islamism has faced various criticisms, both from within the Muslim world and from external
sources. Some of the common criticisms include:
1. Lack of Practicality: Critics argue that the idea of a unified Muslim world, especially in the
form of a political or governance structure, is impractical. The vast diversity within the Muslim
community in terms of cultures, traditions, and political systems makes the realization of a
unified Islamic state challenging.
2. Political Manipulation: Some critics assert that Pan-Islamism has been manipulated for
political purposes by certain leaders or groups to advance their own agendas. It is argued
that, in some cases, the rhetoric of unity has been used to gain support or justify actions that
might not necessarily serve the best interests of the broader Muslim community.
3. Secular Opposition: Secularists within Muslim-majority countries often criticize Pan-
Islamism for promoting religious governance and potentially limiting individual freedoms.
They argue for the separation of religion and state, asserting that a focus on Islamic unity might
hinder the development of secular institutions and practices.
4. Divisions within the Muslim World: Critics point out that the Muslim world itself is
characterized by significant divisions, both politically and doctrinally. Ethnic, sectarian, and
political differences among Muslim-majority nations can hinder the realization of a cohesive
Pan-Islamic vision.
5. Historical Failures: Skeptics argue that historical attempts to implement Pan-Islamic ideas,
such as the early 20th-century efforts in the Ottoman Empire, faced challenges and ultimately
failed. These failures are cited as evidence that the practical implementation of Pan-Islamism is
fraught with difficulties.

Page 52 of 53
6. Potential for Extremism: Some critics express concerns that Pan-Islamism, when taken to
extremes, can contribute to radicalization and extremism. They argue that the idea of a united
Muslim front against perceived external threats can be exploited by extremist groups to justify
violence and intolerance.
7. Incompatibility with Pluralism: Critics contend that Pan-Islamism, especially when
conceived as a singular, exclusive identity, may be incompatible with the diversity and pluralism
found within the Muslim world. Emphasizing a singular Islamic identity may neglect the rich
tapestry of cultural, linguistic, and sectarian differences among Muslims.

Page 53 of 53