MPC 5
MPC 5
2023-24
Research Methods (MPC-005) Tutor Marked Assignment (TMA) Course Code: MPC-
005 Assignment Code: MPC-005/AST/TMA/2023-24 Marks: 100 Note: All Questions
Are Compulsory
Section A
Answer the following question in about 1000 words each. 15x3=45Marks
1. Define sampling. Discuss the different methods of sampling.
Ans. Sampling is a process of selecting a subset of individuals or elements from a larger
population for the purpose of studying or drawing inferences about the population. Sampling
is used in various fields, including social sciences, business, engineering, and health sciences.
The process of sampling involves selecting a sample that is representative of the population
from which it was drawn, in order to minimize bias and increase the accuracy of the results.
There are several different methods of sampling, including probability sampling and non-
probability sampling. Probability sampling methods involve random selection of samples,
while non-probability sampling methods do not.
4. Cluster Sampling: Cluster sampling is a type of probability sampling method in which the
population is divided into clusters or groups, and then a random sample of clusters is
selected. All members of the selected clusters are then included in the sample. Cluster
sampling is often used when the population is large and geographically dispersed.
Probability sampling methods involve random selection of samples, which ensures that every
member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. This
increases the representativeness of the sample and reduces sampling error, which is the
difference between the sample statistic and the true population parameter. Probability
sampling methods are generally more representative and reliable, but they can be time-
consuming and resource-intensive, especially when the population is large and diverse.
Simple random sampling is the most basic type of probability sampling method, in which
every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. This
method is often used in small populations, where it is easy to identify and list all members of
the population. Simple random sampling can be done with or without replacement. When
sampling with replacement, each member of the population has an equal chance of being
selected for each draw, even if they have been selected before. When sampling without
replacement, each member of the population can only be selected once, which reduces the
chance of duplication but increases the risk of bias if the sampling frame is not complete or
accurate.
Cluster sampling is a type of probability sampling method in which the population is divided
into clusters or groups, and then a random sample of clusters is selected. All members of the
selected clusters are then included in the sample. Cluster sampling is often used when the
population is large and geographically dispersed, and it can be more efficient and cost-
effective than simple random sampling or stratified sampling. However, cluster sampling can
introduce bias if the clusters are not representative of the population or if there is
heterogeneity within clusters.
Non-probability sampling methods do not involve random selection of samples, which means
that every member of the population does not have an equal chance of being selected for the
sample. Non-probability sampling methods are often used when probability sampling
methods are not feasible or practical, such as when the population is difficult to access,
identify, or define. However, non-probability sampling methods can introduce bias and
reduce the representativeness and reliability of the sample, which can affect the validity and
generalizability of the results.
Quota sampling is a type of non-probability sampling method in which the researcher selects
individuals based on specific characteristics, such as age, sex, or race, until a predetermined
quota is met. Quota sampling is often used in market research or opinion polls, but it can
result in biased samples if the quotas are not representative of the population or if the
selection of the individuals is subjective or arbitrary.
1. Identify the research problem: The first step in the research process is to identify the
research problem or question. The research problem should be clear, specific, and relevant to
the field of study. The research problem can be identified through literature review,
observation, personal experience, or discussion with colleagues.
2. Conduct a literature review: The second step in the research process is to conduct a
literature review. A literature review involves searching and reviewing existing literature
relevant to the research problem. The literature review helps the researcher to identify the
gaps, strengths, and weaknesses in the existing knowledge and to develop a theoretical or
conceptual framework for the research.
3. Develop research questions and hypotheses: The third step in the research process is to
develop research questions or hypotheses. Research questions are specific and focused
questions that guide the research. Hypotheses are tentative statements about the relationship
between variables that can be tested through empirical research.
4. Choose a research design: The fourth step in the research process is to choose a research
design. The research design is the plan or strategy for conducting the research and collecting
data. There are several types of research designs, including experimental, quasi-experimental,
correlational, descriptive, and exploratory.
5. Select a sample: The fifth step in the research process is to select a sample. A sample is a
subset of the population that is selected for the study. The selection of the sample should be
representative of the population and should be done using a suitable sampling method.
6. Collect data: The sixth step in the research process is to collect data. Data can be collected
through various methods, including surveys, questionnaires, interviews, observations, and
experiments. The data collection method should be appropriate for the research question and
the research design.
7. Analyze data: The seventh step in the research process is to analyze data. Data analysis
involves organizing, summarizing, and interpreting the data collected. Data analysis can be
done using various statistical or qualitative methods, depending on the research question and
the type of data collected.
8. Draw conclusions: The eighth step in the research process is to draw conclusions.
Conclusions are the answers to the research questions or hypotheses. The conclusions should
be based on the data collected and analyzed and should be supported by the literature review
and the theoretical or conceptual framework.
9. Communicate the results: The final step in the research process is to communicate the
results. Communication of the results can be done through various means, including research
reports, journal articles, conference presentations, or public presentations. The
communication of the results should be clear, concise, and relevant to the audience.
10. Identify the research problem: This step involves identifying a research problem or
question that is relevant to the field of study. The research problem should be clear, specific,
and manageable in terms of scope and resources. The research problem can be identified
through various sources, including personal experience, observation, literature review, or
discussions with colleagues.
11. Conduct a literature review: This step involves searching and reviewing existing literature
relevant to the research problem. The literature review helps the researcher to identify the
gaps, strengths, and weaknesses in the existing knowledge and to develop a theoretical or
conceptual framework for the research. The literature review can be done using various
sources, including academic journals, books, conference proceedings, and online databases.
12. Develop research questions and hypotheses: This step involves developing specific and
focused research questions or hypotheses that guide the research. Research questions are
usually open-ended and exploratory, while hypotheses are tentative statements about the
relationship between variables that can be tested through empirical research. Research
questions and hypotheses should be based on the research problem and the theoretical or
conceptual framework developed in the literature review.
13. Choose a research design: This step involves choosing a research design that is
appropriate for the research questions or hypotheses. There are several types of research
designs, including experimental, quasi-experimental, correlational, descriptive, and
exploratory. The choice of research design depends on several factors, including the nature of
the research problem, the availability of resources, and ethical considerations.
14. Select a sample: This step involves selecting a sample that is representative of the
population and suitable for the research design. The selection of the sample should be done
using a suitable sampling method, such as simple random sampling, stratified sampling, or
cluster sampling. The size of the sample should also be determined based on statistical
considerations, such as sample size calculation.
15. Collect data: This step involves collecting data using a suitable data collection method
that is appropriate for the research design and the research questions or hypotheses. Data
collection methods can include surveys, questionnaires, interviews, observations, and
experiments. The data collection process should be carefully planned and executed to ensure
the validity and reliability of the data collected.
16. Analyze data: This step involves analyzing the data collected using appropriate statistical
or qualitative methods. Data analysis can include descriptive statistics, inferential statistics,
content analysis, or thematic analysis, depending on the nature of the research questions or
hypotheses and the type of data collected. Data analysis should be done carefully to ensure
the accuracy and validity of the results.
17. Draw conclusions: This step involves drawing conclusions based on the data analyzed
and the research questions or hypotheses. Conclusions should be based on the evidence
gathered and should be supported by the literature review and the theoretical or conceptual
framework. Conclusions should be clear, concise, and relevant to the research problem and
the field of study.
18. Communicate the results: This step involves communicating the results of the research to
the relevant audience. Communication of the results can be done through various means,
including research reports, journal articles, conference presentations, or public presentations.
Communication of the results should be clear, concise, and relevant to the audience and
should follow the ethical guidelines and standards of the field of study.
3. Discuss the meaning, types and relevance of qualitative research. Explain the ethical
guidelines in qualitative research.
Ans. Qualitative research is a type of research that aims to understand the meaning and
experiences of individuals or groups. It is a subjective approach that focuses on the
exploration and interpretation of social phenomena in their natural setting. In this section, we
will discuss the meaning, types, and relevance of qualitative research, as well as the ethical
guidelines that researchers must follow when conducting qualitative research.
3. Grounded theory: Grounded theory is a research method that is used to develop theories
from data. It involves collecting data and using it to develop a theory that explains the
phenomenon being studied.
4. Case study: Case study is a research method that involves intensive investigation of a
particular case or cases. It is often used to explore complex phenomena in real-world settings.
1. Informed consent: Researchers should ensure that participants are fully informed about the
research project and their participation, including the purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits.
Participants should provide informed consent before participating in the study, and they
should be free to withdraw at any time.
2. Confidentiality: Researchers should ensure that the identity and personal information of
participants are kept confidential. Participants should be assured that their responses will be
kept anonymous, and their personal information will not be shared with anyone.
3. Respect for participants: Researchers should treat participants with respect and dignity.
They should avoid any harm or deception that may cause physical or psychological harm to
participants.
4. Voluntary participation: Researchers should ensure that participants are not coerced or
pressured into participating in the study. They should be free to decline participation without
any negative consequences.
5. Data storage and security: Researchers should ensure that the data collected from
participants are stored securely and confidentially. Only authorized personnel should have
access to the data.
6. Debriefing: Researchers should provide participants with debriefing after the study is
completed. They should explain the purpose and findings of the study and answer any
questions that participants may have.
7. Minimization of harm: Researchers should take measures to minimize any potential harm
or discomfort that participants may experience during the study. They should ensure that the
research procedures are safe and non-invasive, and they should provide support or referrals to
participants who may require additional assistance.
8. Cultural sensitivity: Researchers should be aware of the cultural and social context of the
participants and should take steps to ensure that the research procedures and questions are
culturally appropriate and sensitive. They should also ensure that the research does not
reinforce stereotypes or prejudices.
9. Conflict of interest: Researchers should disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may
affect the research or the participants. They should ensure that the research is conducted with
integrity and objectivity, and they should not use the research to promote their own interests
or agendas.
10. Institutional review: Researchers should obtain approval from an institutional review
board (IRB) or ethics committee before conducting the study. The IRB or ethics committee
will review the research proposal and ensure that it meets ethical and legal standards.
Researchers should also follow any additional guidelines or regulations set by their institution
or funding agency.
11. Transparency: Researchers should be transparent about the research procedures, findings,
and limitations. They should provide accurate and complete information about the study to
the participants, the scientific community, and the public.
12. Data sharing: Researchers should consider sharing their data with other researchers to
promote transparency, collaboration, and scientific advancement. However, they should
ensure that the data are de-identified and that the privacy and confidentiality of participants
are protected.
In conclusion, ethical guidelines are essential in qualitative research to ensure that the rights
and dignity of participants are protected. Researchers should follow ethical guidelines when
conducting qualitative research to ensure that the research is conducted with integrity,
objectivity, and sensitivity. Ethical guidelines also promote transparency, collaboration, and
scientific advancement, and they are essential in building trust between researchers,
participants, and the public.
Section B
Answer the following questions in about 400 words each. 5x5=25Marks
4. Criteria and misconceptions of case studies.
Ans. Case studies are a type of qualitative research method that involves the in-depth
investigation of a particular case or cases. Case studies are often used in fields such as
psychology, sociology, education, and business to explore complex phenomena in real-world
settings. In this section, we will discuss the criteria and misconceptions of case studies.
1. Richness: Case studies should provide rich and detailed data that allows for an in-depth
analysis of the phenomenon being studied. The data should include multiple sources of
information, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and should provide a
comprehensive understanding of the case.
2. Relevance: Case studies should be relevant to the research question or problem being
investigated. The case should be selected based on its ability to provide insights into the
phenomenon being studied.
4. Validity: Case studies should be conducted using a rigorous and systematic approach to
ensure the validity of the findings. The researcher should use multiple sources of data and
should triangulate the data to ensure that the findings are valid and reliable.
5. Ethical considerations: Case studies should follow ethical guidelines to ensure that the
rights and dignity of the participants are protected. Researchers should obtain informed
consent from the participants, ensure confidentiality, and minimize any potential harm or
discomfort.
1. Lack of generalizability: One common misconception about case studies is that they lack
generalizability. While case studies cannot be used to make generalizations about a
population or phenomenon, they can provide insights into the complex and unique aspects of
a particular case. Case studies can also generate hypotheses or theories that can be tested
through further research.
2. Subjectivity: Another common misconception about case studies is that they are subjective
and lack objectivity. While case studies are based on the researcher's interpretation of the
data, they can still be conducted using a rigorous and systematic approach. The researcher
can use multiple sources of data and triangulate the data to ensure that the findings are valid
and reliable.
3. Lack of quantitative data: Some researchers may believe that case studies are only useful
for collecting qualitative data and cannot provide quantitative data. While case studies are
often used to collect qualitative data, they can also be used to collect quantitative data, such
as numerical data from surveys or measurements.
4. Inability to test hypotheses: Some researchers may believe that case studies cannot be used
to test hypotheses or theories. While case studies are often used to generate hypotheses or
theories, they can also be used to test them. The researcher can use a comparative case study
approach to test the hypotheses or theories.
In conclusion, case studies are a type of qualitative research method that involves the in-
depth investigation of a particular case or cases. Case studies should meet certain criteria,
such as richness, relevance, generalizability, validity, and ethical considerations.
Misconceptions about case studies, such as lack of generalizability, subjectivity, and inability
to test hypotheses, should be addressed to ensure that researchers use case studies
appropriately and effectively.
5. Types of variables.
Ans. In research, variables refer to characteristics or attributes that can vary or change.
Variables are an essential part of research because they allow researchers to measure and
analyze the relationship between different phenomena. In this section, we will discuss the
different types of variables used in research.
Independent Variable
Dependent Variable
The dependent variable is the variable that is being measured or observed in the study. It is
the variable that is hypothesized to be affected by the independent variable. For example, in a
study on the effect of caffeine on alertness, alertness would be the dependent variable, as it is
being measured to observe the effect of caffeine.
Control Variable
The control variable is a variable that is held constant or controlled by the researcher to
ensure that any observed changes in the dependent variable are due to the independent
variable. For example, in a study on the effect of caffeine on alertness, the control variable
could be the amount of sleep the participants had the night before the study. By controlling
for the amount of sleep, the researcher can ensure that any observed changes in alertness are
due to the caffeine and not the amount of sleep.
Categorical Variable
Categorical variables are variables that can be divided into categories or groups. They are
often expressed in terms of labels or names. Categorical variables can be nominal or ordinal.
Nominal variables are categories that have no inherent order or ranking, such as gender or
race. Ordinal variables are categories that have a natural order or ranking, such as income
level or education level.
Continuous Variable
Continuous variables are variables that can take on any value within a specified range. They
are often expressed in terms of numbers. Continuous variables can be interval or ratio.
Interval variables are variables in which the difference between two values is meaningful, but
there is no true zero point, such as temperature. Ratio variables are variables in which the
difference between two values is meaningful, and there is a true zero point, such as weight or
height.
Discrete Variable
Discrete variables are variables that can only take on certain values within a specified range.
They are often expressed in terms of whole numbers. Discrete variables can be nominal or
ordinal. Nominal variables are categories that have no inherent order or ranking, such as the
number of siblings a person has. Ordinal variables are categories that have a natural order or
ranking, such as the grade level of a student.
Extraneous Variable
Extraneous variables are variables that can affect the relationship between the independent
and dependent variables. They are variables that are not of interest to the researcher but can
still affect the results of the study. Extraneous variables can be controlled or measured in the
study to ensure that they do not affect the results.
Moderating Variable
Moderating variables are variables that can affect the strength or direction of the relationship
between the independent and dependent variables. They are variables that can change the
relationship between the two variables. For example, in a study on the effect of caffeine on
alertness, age could be a moderating variable. Older adults may be less affected by caffeine
than younger adults, so age could change the strength or direction of the relationship between
caffeine and alertness.
Mediating Variable
Mediating variables are variables that explain the relationship between the independent and
dependent variables. They are variables that come between the independent and dependent
variables and explain how the independent variable affects the dependent variable. For
example, in a study on the effect of caffeine on alertness, the mediating variable could be
heart rate. Caffeine increases heart rate, which in turn increases alertness.
In conclusion, variables are an essential part of research, as they allow researchers to measure
and analyze the relationship between different phenomena. There are different types of
variables used in research, including independent, dependent, control, categorical,
continuous, discrete, extraneous, moderating, and mediating variables. Researchers must
understand the different types of variables and how they can affect the results of a study to
ensure that their research is valid and reliable.
2. Ethical considerations: Quasi-experimental designs are often used when it is not ethical to
randomly assign participants to groups. For example, it may not be ethical to randomly assign
participants to a smoking or non-smoking group. Quasi-experimental designs allow
researchers to study the effect of an independent variable while still maintaining ethical
considerations.
4. More feasible: Quasi-experimental designs are often more feasible than true experimental
designs. They can be used when it is not possible to control all of the variables in the study,
which is often the case in real-world settings.
5. High external validity: Quasi-experimental designs can have high external validity,
meaning that they can be generalized to other populations and settings. This is because they
are often conducted in natural settings and involve real-world situations.
4. Less internal validity: Quasi-experimental designs have less internal validity than true
experimental designs. This means that it is more difficult to establish a cause-and-effect
relationship between the independent and dependent variables.
1. Closed-Ended Questions
Closed-ended questions are questions that provide a set of response options for the participant
to choose from. Closed-ended questions are often used to measure attitudes, beliefs, and
behaviors. Examples of closed-ended questions include:
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "I feel happy most of the time."
- How many hours per week do you exercise?
- Have you ever smoked cigarettes?
Closed-ended questions can be used to collect quantitative data that can be analyzed using
statistical methods.
2. Open-Ended Questions
Open-ended questions are questions that allow participants to respond in their own words.
Open-ended questions are often used to collect qualitative data, such as opinions,
experiences, and perceptions. Examples of open-ended questions include:
Open-ended questions can provide rich and detailed data that can be used to gain insights into
the participant's thoughts and experiences.
Likert scale questions are a type of closed-ended question that measures the participant's level
of agreement or disagreement with a statement. Likert scale questions typically use a five-
point or seven-point scale, with response options ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly
disagree." Examples of Likert scale questions include:
- How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "I feel confident in my
ability to manage my finances."
- To what extent do you believe that climate change is a serious issue?
- How satisfied are you with your current job?
Likert scale questions can provide quantitative data that can be analyzed using statistical
methods.
Multiple choice questions can provide quantitative data that can be analyzed using statistical
methods.
5. Ranking Questions
Ranking questions are a type of closed-ended question that asks participants to rank a set of
items in order of importance. Ranking questions are often used to measure preferences or
priorities. Examples of ranking questions include:
- Please rank the following factors in order of importance when choosing a restaurant: price,
location, quality of food, ambiance, and service.
- Please rank the following environmental issues in order of priority: climate change, air
pollution, water pollution, deforestation, and loss of biodiversity.
Ranking questions can provide quantitative data that can be analyzed using statistical
methods.
In conclusion, there are several types of questions that can be used in a survey research,
including closed-ended questions, open-ended questions, Likert scale questions, multiple
choice questions, and ranking questions. Each type of question has its own strengths and
weaknesses and can be used to collect different types of data. Researchers must carefully
consider the types of questions that are most appropriate for their research question and the
population they are studying.
The Pearson correlation coefficient is a measure of the strength and direction of the linear
relationship between two variables. It is the most commonly used measure of correlation in
research. The Pearson correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to 1, with -1 indicating a perfect
negative correlation, 0 indicating no correlation, and 1 indicating a perfect positive
correlation. This type of correlation is often used in psychology and other social sciences to
measure the relationship between two continuous variables.
The point-biserial correlation coefficient is used when one variable is continuous and the
other variable is dichotomous (i.e., has only two possible values). This correlation coefficient
measures the strength and direction of the relationship between the continuous variable and
the dichotomous variable. This type of correlation is often used in psychology and other
social sciences to measure the relationship between a continuous variable (such as age) and a
dichotomous variable (such as gender).
4. Phi Coefficient
The phi coefficient is a measure of the strength and direction of the relationship between two
dichotomous variables. This correlation coefficient is similar to the point-biserial correlation
coefficient, but it is used when both variables are dichotomous. The phi coefficient ranges
from -1 to 1, with -1 indicating a perfect negative correlation, 0 indicating no correlation, and
1 indicating a perfect positive correlation. This type of correlation is often used in research in
which both variables are categorical, such as in studies of the relationship between smoking
and lung cancer.
The biserial correlation coefficient is used when one variable is continuous and the other
variable is dichotomous, but the continuous variable is assumed to have a normal distribution.
This correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the relationship between
the continuous variable and the dichotomous variable. This type of correlation is often used
in psychology and other social sciences to measure the relationship between a continuous
variable (such as IQ) and a dichotomous variable (such as diagnosis of a mental disorder).
Section C
Answer the following in about 50 words each. 10x3=30Marks
9. Difference between causal comparative and experimental research design
Ans. Causal-comparative research is a type of research design that aims to identify the cause-
and-effect relationship between two or more variables. This type of research design involves
comparing groups of individuals who differ on a particular variable of interest to determine
the effect of that variable on an outcome. In contrast, experimental research is a research
design that involves manipulating one variable (the independent variable) and measuring the
effect on another variable (the dependent variable) while controlling for other variables. The
key difference between the two designs is that experimental research involves manipulating
the independent variable, while causal-comparative research does not.
1. Null hypothesis: This type of hypothesis states that there is no relationship or difference
between variables.
3. Directional hypothesis: This type of hypothesis predicts the direction of the relationship
between variables.
4. Non-directional hypothesis: This type of hypothesis does not predict the direction of the
relationship between variables.
6. Simple hypothesis: This type of hypothesis includes only one variable or condition.
1. Internal validity: The extent to which a study's findings are accurate and can be attributed
to the independent variable.
2. External validity: The extent to which a study's findings can be generalized to other
populations or situations.
3. Construct validity: The extent to which a study's measures accurately assess the concept or
construct being studied.
4. Content validity: The extent to which a test or measure covers all aspects of the concept or
construct being studied.
5. Criterion validity: The extent to which a test or measure is related to a criterion measure or
outcome.
6. Face validity: The extent to which a test or measure appears to measure what it intends to
measure.
12. Reliability.
Ans. Reliability refers to the consistency or stability of a measure or test over time or across
different evaluators or raters. A measure or test is considered reliable if it produces consistent
results each time it is administered. There are several types of reliability that are important to
consider:
1. Test-retest reliability: The extent to which a measure produces consistent results when
administered to the same individuals at different times.
2. Inter-rater reliability: The extent to which different raters or evaluators produce consistent
results when using the same measure.
3. Internal consistency reliability: The extent to which different items on a measure or test are
consistent with each other and measure the same construct.
4. Parallel forms reliability: The extent to which different versions of a test or measure
produce consistent results.
2. Longitudinal survey: A survey that collects data from the same individuals over an
extended period of time.
3. Panel survey: A type of longitudinal survey that involves collecting data from the same
individuals at multiple points in time.
4. Trend survey: A type of longitudinal survey that collects data from different individuals at
multiple points in time.
5. Cohort survey: A type of longitudinal survey that collects data from individuals who share
a common experience or characteristic.
1. Sampling bias: Occurs when the sample of participants is not representative of the
population being studied.
2. Selection bias: Occurs when participants are not randomly assigned to groups or
conditions, leading to non-equivalent groups.
3. Measurement bias: Occurs when the measure used to collect data is not valid or reliable.
4. Confirmation bias: Occurs when researchers interpret data in a way that supports their
preconceived beliefs or hypotheses.
5. Publication bias: Occurs when studies that do not find significant results are less likely to
be published, leading to an overrepresentation of significant findings in the literature.