Scribd
Upload
21 views4 pages

Case File 1

legal case file for term 2

Uploaded by

tanya02102008
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
21 views4 pages

Case File 1

legal case file for term 2

Uploaded by

tanya02102008
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Case File: In re Gault (1967)

---

Case Citation: In re Gault , 387 U.S. 1 (1967)

Court: United States Supreme Court

Date Decided: May 15, 1967

---

1. Background Information
- Defendant : Gerald Francis Gault, a 15-year-old juvenile.
- Location : Gila County, Arizona, USA.
- Incident : Gerald Gault was accused of making lewd and obscene remarks
in a phone call to a female neighbor, Mrs. Cook. Following this, he was taken into
custody without proper notification to his parents, nor were they informed of his
rights or the charges in any formal manner.

2. Case Facts
- Initial Arrest : On June 8, 1964, Gault was taken by the police while his
parents were at work. His mother only discovered his whereabouts by searching
the local jail and was later informed of his detention.
- Juvenile Court Proceedings : Gault’s case proceeded in juvenile court,
where he and his family were not given a formal notice of charges. The hearings
lacked key procedural elements such as witnesses or sworn testimony, and Gerald
was not represented by an attorney. His accuser, Mrs. Cook, was not present, and
no records or transcripts of the proceedings were kept.
- Outcome : Despite the lack of due process, Gerald was sentenced to six
years in a state industrial school—until he reached the age of 21. An adult
convicted of the same offense would have faced a maximum sentence of two
months in jail.

3. Legal Issues
- The central issue was whether juveniles should be granted the same
constitutional rights as adults in criminal proceedings, particularly:
- Right to Due Process (under the 14th Amendment)
- Right to Notice of Charges
- Right to Legal Representation
- Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses
- Right Against Self-Incrimination

4. Arguments Presented
- Defense (Gault’s Lawyers) : They argued that Gerald Gault’s constitutional
rights were violated, as he was denied due process during the juvenile court
proceedings. His defense emphasized that the juvenile justice system's “informal”
nature led to procedural violations and deprived juveniles of the necessary
protections afforded to adults.
- State of Arizona : The state argued that juvenile courts are meant to be
rehabilitative rather than punitive, and thus do not require the same formal legal
proceedings as adult courts.

5. Supreme Court Decision


- Ruling : The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gault in an 8-1 decision.
- Majority Opinion : Justice Abe Fortas delivered the opinion, stating that
juveniles have the right to due process protections under the 14th Amendment.
The court emphasized that juveniles, like adults, are entitled to a fair trial,
particularly when their liberty is at stake.
- Dissenting Opinion : Justice Potter Stewart dissented, arguing that juvenile
courts were intended to operate differently from adult courts, focusing on the
needs of minors rather than punishment.

6. Key Principles Established


The Supreme Court's decision in In re Gault established the following critical
due process rights for juveniles in delinquency proceedings:
- Notice of Charges : Juveniles and their guardians must be informed of the
specific charges against them in a timely manner.
- Right to Counsel : Juveniles have the right to legal representation. If they
cannot afford a lawyer, the state must provide one.
- Right to Confront and Cross-Examine Witnesses : Juveniles have the right
to question those who testify against them.
- Right Against Self-Incrimination : Juveniles cannot be compelled to testify
against themselves, a protection that aligns with the 5th Amendment.

7. Impact on Juvenile Justice System


- Shift in Juvenile Court Proceedings : In re Gault fundamentally changed
juvenile justice in the U.S., requiring juvenile courts to adopt procedures that
protect juveniles' rights.
- Rehabilitation and Accountability : The case highlighted the need to
balance rehabilitative intentions of the juvenile justice system with procedural
fairness, ensuring that juveniles are treated fairly and protected against arbitrary
state actions.
- Broader Implications : The case set a precedent for further cases that
expanded the rights of juveniles in court and challenged the informal,
paternalistic nature of juvenile justice proceedings, leading to reforms in juvenile
court processes nationwide.

8. Subsequent Developments
- Following In re Gault, several additional rulings expanded protections for
juveniles, including:
- In re Winship (1970) : Required that guilt in juvenile cases be proven
"beyond a reasonable doubt."
- Breed v. Jones (1975) : Prohibited trying juveniles in both juvenile and
adult courts for the same offense (double jeopardy).
- Legislative Reforms : States across the U.S. enacted changes to their
juvenile justice laws to incorporate due process rights, ensuring juveniles receive
fair and transparent hearings.

9. Conclusion
In re Gault remains a cornerstone case in juvenile law, symbolizing a shift
toward recognizing juveniles' rights within the legal system. It underscored the
importance of fair treatment, regardless of age, and aligned juvenile court
proceedings more closely with constitutional principles. The decision marked a
move away from an overly paternalistic juvenile system towards one that respects
minors' legal protections, effectively transforming the landscape of juvenile
justice in the United States.

You might also like