Get Innovative Technologies and Learning Third International Conference ICITL 2020 Porto Portugal November 23 25 2020 Proceedings Tien-Chi Huang PDF ebook with Full Chapters Now
Get Innovative Technologies and Learning Third International Conference ICITL 2020 Porto Portugal November 23 25 2020 Proceedings Tien-Chi Huang PDF ebook with Full Chapters Now
Get Innovative Technologies and Learning Third International Conference ICITL 2020 Porto Portugal November 23 25 2020 Proceedings Tien-Chi Huang PDF ebook with Full Chapters Now
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/innovative-technologies-
and-learning-third-international-conference-
icitl-2020-porto-portugal-november-23-25-2020-proceedings-
tien-chi-huang/
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWNLOAD NOW
Innovative Technologies
and Learning
Third International Conference, ICITL 2020
Porto, Portugal, November 23–25, 2020
Proceedings
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 12555
Founding Editors
Gerhard Goos
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
Juris Hartmanis
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Innovative Technologies
and Learning
Third International Conference, ICITL 2020
Porto, Portugal, November 23–25, 2020
Proceedings
123
Editors
Tien-Chi Huang Ting-Ting Wu
National Taichung University of Science National Yunlin University of Science
and Technology and Technology
Taichung City, Taiwan Douliou, Taiwan
João Barroso Frode Eika Sandnes
University of Trás-os-Montes Oslo Metropolitan University
and Alto Douro Oslo, Norway
Vila Real, Portugal
Yueh-Min Huang
Paulo Martins National Cheng Kung University
University of Trás-os-Montes Tainan City, Taiwan
and Alto Douro
Vila Real, Portugal
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
Honorary Chairs
Yueh-Min Huang National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
Conference Co-chairs
João Barroso University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal
Frode Eika Sandnes Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway
Program Co-chairs
Tien-Chi Huang National Taichung University of Science
and Technology, Taiwan
Paulo Martins University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal
Ting-Ting Wu National Yunlin University of Science and Technology,
Taiwan
Program Committee
Ana Balula University of Aveiro, Portugal
Andreja Istenic Starcic University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
António Coelho University of Porto, Portugal
Arsênio Reis University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal
Chantana Viriyavejakul King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang,
Thailand
Chi‐Cheng Chang National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan
Claudia Motta Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Constantino Martins Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Portugal
Danial Hooshyar University of Tartu, Estonia
Daniela Pedrosa University of Aveiro, Portugal
Grace Qi Massey University, New Zealand
Gwo-Dong Chen National Central University, Taiwan
Hana Mohelska University of Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
Hanlie Smuts University of Pretoria, South Africa
Hugo Paredes University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal
João Pedro Gomes Moreira University of Porto, Portugal
Pêgo
José Cravino University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal
José Alberto Lencastre University of Minho, Portugal
Jun-Ming Su National University of Tainan, Taiwan
Leonel Morgado Universidade Aberta, Portugal
viii Organization
Technology Support
Yu-Cheng Chien National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
Pei-Yu Cheng National Yunlin University of Science and Technology,
Taiwan
Shih-Cheng Wang National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
Hsin-Yu Lee National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
Main Organizers
Co-organizers
Contents
Technology-Enhanced Learning
Removing Digital Natives from Technological Illiteracy with the Weblog . . . 598
Michele Della Ventura
The Use of E-learning Tools and Log Data in a Course on Basic Logic. . . . . 610
Peter Øhrstrøm, Steinar Thorvaldsen, Ulrik Sandborg-Petersen,
Thomas Ploug, and David Jakobsen
Abstract. The great changes in education have shifted the use of the traditional
pedagogical approach to the techno-pedagogical approach. However, business
or management education merely postulates the traditional one by the teacher-
centered method. The techno-pedagogical approach will be designed to
emphasize the use of flipped classroom and Jigsaw II cooperative learning
approaches to optimize the learning process. Therefore, this research proposes a
design of an innovative pedagogical model of teaching methodology with the
Flipped-Jigsaw II Cooperative Learning approach in order to promote an
effective learning environment of the International Marketing Management
course which is later expected to activate the important skills as the element of
the projected outcomes of the course. A deep interview has conducted to three
interviewees in verifying the proposed model from the teachers’ perspective.
The result shows that the proposed model is projected to facilitate the learning
process in order to attain the course’s outcome better than the traditional ones.
1 Introduction
2 Literature Review
The overall course design is projected to facilitate the learning process in order to
attain the goals or outcomes of the course. As illustrated in Fig. 1, there is a linkage
6 N. A. R. M. Sari and T.-T. Wu
between the benefits of the proposed pedagogical approaches and the goals or out-
comes of the International Marketing Management course that contributes to the cul-
tivation of specific skills, namely interpersonal relationship, communication abilities,
critical thinking, problem-solving analytical skills, independent thought, and
teamwork-leadership skills to be mastered by the learners.
3 Conceptual Model
3.1 A Conceptual Model Using a Flipped Classroom
Figure 2 adapted from a model proposed by [15] shows that flipped learning focuses on
dividing its learning process into two different learning environments; home-based and
school-based learning environments. Normally, teaching materials in the basic flipped
classroom will be categorized by using online videos, online presentations, digital
textbooks, and any other forms of media in order to enact them to be way more
accessible to a home-based environment.
The process that takes place at home is called the pre-class. The pre-class session
will begin with chunking and separating teaching materials by teachers into shorter
online videos, shorter online presentations, split parts of a topic in digital textbooks,
and any other divided forms of media. Online platforms will be used as the course
management system in which teachers can distribute the materials to the students.
Then, students will be requested to learn the provided teaching materials on their own,
which means students will have a self-paced learning environment. Students are
allowed to keep track of questions and concerns on which they need clarification [15].
The pre-class will be followed by an in-class session which will take place at school
or later called a school-based environment. In-class session facilitates face-to-face class
time in which students can use it to complete follow-up assignments as they come to
the class by having the pre-class materials prepared. In this session, the old term of
teacher-centered learning has shifted to student-centered learning as well as changing
teachers’ roles from “sage on the stage” to “guide on the side”. Face-to-face instruction
incorporates activities promoting higher-order thinking, social learning, and 21st-
century skills cultivation [15, 16]. Moreover, the implementation of learning activities
in-class encourages students’ responsibility for operating both group and individual
tasks.
A Model of a Cooperative Learning Technique 7
In this approach, each student needs to prepare a part of assignments outside the
classroom or later described as pre-work. Students organize pre-work as they already
assigned to groups. Each group represents a number of students that is called a home
group and has an obligation to cover the assigned subject provided by teachers. The
provided subject will be chunked into parts; thus, each member of the group will have a
responsibility to learn and understand the assigned part given to him or her. Then, in
the face-to-face class time, students will be split up from their original home group to
gather up in a new form of the group with other students from different groups who are
responsible for preparing the same parts of the assigned subject.
The new form of the group is called the expert group, in which students will have a
discussion on regard to the parts of the assigned subject to make it way more under-
standable for each other. Also, they prepare a plan on how they teach the subject to
their home group as well as preparing a report. Before going back to their home group,
each student will be assigned in a test which aimed at verifying their knowledge and
understanding the subject. The test can be performed in any kind of assessment format.
Afterward, they turn back to their home group to teach their subject and contribute to
preparing the report. In the last stage, teachers will facilitate learning activities by
evaluating and grading.
which are distributed over online platforms. Each group, later called home group, will
divide the responsibility to cover a part of the chunked subject to each group member.
The following process is the in-class session. Students will have face-to-face class
time at school with a student-centered learning environment. Students from original
home groups will gather up in a new group called the expert group. In the expert group,
students will perform discussions in order to make the assigned subject more under-
standable. Then, they will have a test before leaving the expert group aiming at veri-
fying their knowledge and understanding over the subject. Students back to their
original home group to teach other group members and help to prepare the report. In
the end, teachers will facilitate the learning process to unify the class through evalu-
ation and grading supported by designed assessment tools. Score as the result of the
assessment will be given once to an individual student, then all group members’ scores
are averaged to generate a group score.
A deep interview has conducted to verify the proposed model of the Jigsaw II coop-
erative learning approach in a flipped International Marketing Management course.
There are three interviewees who participated in the interview, as described in Table 2.
6 Conclusions
The overall course design with the Jigsaw II cooperative learning approach in a flipped
classroom is projected to facilitate the learning process in order to attain the goals or
outcomes of the course better compared to the traditional pedagogical approaches.
There is a linkage between the benefits of the proposed pedagogical approaches and the
goals or outcomes of the International Marketing Management course that contributes
A Model of a Cooperative Learning Technique 11
References
1. Hinojo Lucena, F.J., López Belmonte, J., Fuentes Cabrera, A., Trujillo Torres, J.M., Pozo
Sánchez, S.: Academic effects of the use of flipped learning in physical education. Int.
J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health (2019)
2. Álvarez-Rodríguez, M.D., Bellido-Márquez, M.d.C., Atencia-Barrero, P.: Teaching though
ICT in obligatory secondary education. Analysis of Online Teaching Tools. Rev. Educ. a
Distancia (2019)
3. Khine, M.S., Ali, N., Afari, E.: Exploring relationships among TPACK constructs and ICT
achievement among trainee teachers. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2017)
4. Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L., Hadgraft, R., Smith, N.: The Flipped Classroom Practice and
Practices in Higher Education. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-
10-3413-8
5. Ahmed, H.O.K.: Flipped learning as a new educational paradigm: an analytical critical
study. Eur. Sci. J. (ESJ) (2016)
6. Zainuddin, Z., Halili, S.H.: Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of
study. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn (2016). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.
2274
7. Huang, Y.-M., Liao, Y.-W., Huang, S.-H., Chen, H.-C.: A Jigsaw-based cooperative
learning approach to improve learning outcomes for mobile situated learning. Educ.
Technol. Soc. 17, 128–140 (2014)
8. Almasseri, M., AlHojailan, M.I.: How flipped learning based on the cognitive theory of
multimedia learning affects students’ academic achievements. J. Comput. Assist. Learn.
(2019)
12 N. A. R. M. Sari and T.-T. Wu
9. Abeysekera, L., Dawson, P.: Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom:
definition, rationale, and a call for research. High. Educ. Res. Dev. (2015)
10. Strelan, P., Osborn, A., Palmer, E.: The flipped classroom: a meta-analysis of effects on
student performance across disciplines and education levels (2020)
11. Lage, M.J., Platt, G.J., Treglia, M.: Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an
inclusive learning environment. J. Econ. Educ. 31, 30–43 (2000)
12. Sailer, M., Sailer, M.: Gamification of in‐class activities in flipped classroom lectures. Br.
J. Educ. Technol. (2020)
13. Kennedy, M.: Left to their own devices for education technology. Am. Sch. Univ. 84, n9
(2012)
14. Roehl, A., Reddy, S.L., Shannon, G.J.: The flipped classroom: an opportunity to engage
millennial students through active learning strategies. J. Fam. Consum. Sci. (2013)
15. Huang, C.K., Lin, C.Y.: Flipping business education: transformative use of team-based
learning in human resource management classrooms. Educ. Technol. Soc. (2017)
16. Galway, L.P., Corbett, K.K., Takaro, T.K., Tairyan, K., Frank, E.: A novel integration of
online and flipped classroom instructional models in public health higher education. BMC
Med. Educ. (2014)
17. Slavin Robert, E.: Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. A Simon Schuster
Co., Massachusetts (1995)
18. Ghaith, G.M., Bouzeineddine, A.R.: Relationship between reading attitudes, achievement,
and learners’ perceptions of their Jigsaw II cooperative learning experience. Read. Psychol.
(2003)
19. Şahin, A.: Effects of Jigsaw II technique on academic achievement and attitudes to written
expression course. Educ. Res. Rev. (2010)
20. Petkus Jr., E.: Enhancing the relevance and value of marketing curriculum outcomes to a
liberal arts education. J. Mark. Educ. (2007)
21. Winter, D.G.: A new case for the liberal arts. Assessing Institutional Goals and Student
Development. ERIC (1981)
22. Slavin, R.E.: Cooperative learning and student achievement: six theoretical perspectives.
Adv. Motiv. Achiev. 6, 161–177 (1989)
23. Herreid, C.F., Schiller, N.A.: Case studies and the flipped classroom. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 42,
62–66 (2013)
Combining EEG Feedback on Student
Performance and Self-efficacy
Abstract. This study aims to investigate whether the feedback designed based
on EEG (electroencephalography) signals and mind-mapping contributes to
student attention, performance, and self-efficacy. The EEG headset was used to
collect and measure the participant’s attention levels. This study uses a mixed-
methods of quasi-experimental design. The participants were 30 graduate stu-
dents that randomly assigned to the control (non-feedback) group and experi-
mental (with-feedback) group. A random grouping was used to divide the
participants into two groups, control and experimental. The participants in
experimental group will receive both negative and positive audio feedback. The
research finding shows that the participants who receive the feedback had higher
attention state and significant influence of self-efficacy compared to those in the
groups without feedback. And the feedback does not influence the participant’s
performance. Meanwhile, participant’s mind-maps score and performance
between the two groups showed no significant influence. This study suggest for
future studies, to explore the effect of different types of feedback on students
attention.
1 Introduction
In the past, attention was measured using the attention scale and answered by partic-
ipants to measure their concentrations. Nowadays, researchers use a physiological
signal device named electroencephalography (EEG) to monitor and measure the
changes in the participant’s attention state [1, 2]. Depends on their states, different
types feedback signals were given [2, 3]. The feedback can help the participants to be
more conscious of the changes in their physiological states during the reading process,
and help them to improve the conditions. Previous studies have shown that EEG
feedback that is given according to participant’s levels of attention can improve the
attention in the reading process, which help them to achieve better reading performance
[1, 3–5]. Besides paying attention during the reading task, the participants also need to
organize the knowledge to generate ideas [6, 7]. Mind mapping is a note-taking method
proposed by Tony Buzan in early 1970 that helps to distinguish words or ideas into a
hierarchical tree format [8]. The mind mapping approach could be useful in developing
cohesive and organized writing texts. The visual illustrations of mind maps assist with
managing, though, directing learning, and making connections.
Plagiarism is a controversial problem among higher education students. It can be
described as presenting someone else’s work or ideas as your own, without their
consent and full knowledge. The main concern is to acknowledge others’ work or ideas
not only to text but also to computer code, illustrations, graphs, etc. To avoid pla-
giarism, students demanded to learn the principles of good academic practice from the
beginning of the study.
The purpose of the study is to investigate whether the feedback designed based on
EEG (electroencephalography) signals and mind-mapping contributes to student
attention, performance, and self-efficacy. This study aims to solve the following
questions:
1. Does the feedback mechanism cause different brainwaves states in participants’
attention?
2. Does the feedback mechanism contribute to student performance and self-efficacy?
3. Does mind-mapping contribute to student performance?
2 Literature Review
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive
from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using
the method you already use to calculate your applicable
taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate
royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or
are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns.
Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent
to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations
to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
textbookfull.com