762670213 Complete Book Fable Wisdom Literature and Epic
762670213 Complete Book Fable Wisdom Literature and Epic
762670213 Complete Book Fable Wisdom Literature and Epic
No Topic Page
number
2 Bang-E-Dara ( 08 Poems) 15 to 35
3 Gulistan of Sa’di ( 10 Parables) 35 to 54
Edited by :
Muhammad Shahid,
Lecturer English,
Govt Graduate College, Jauharabad
03339825611
What is Fable?
Fables tell us a story and teach us a lesson at the same time and we've been hearing them,
retelling them and writing them for over two thousand years.
A fable is a story that features animals, plants or forces of nature which are
anthropomorphized (given human qualities). A fable always ends with a ‘moral’. This is the
lesson that is intended to be learnt through reading the story.
One of the most famous fables is The Hare and the Tortoise. In this fable, both animals are
anthropomorphised in that they can speak and are competing against each other in a race.
The arrogant hare stops to sleep halfway through the race because he is convinced he has
enough time to do this and then rejoin the race and win it. Meanwhile, the slow but
determined tortoise keeps going and wins while the hare is asleep.
Most of our best-known fables are thought to have been written by a man called Aesop, who
is believed to have been a slave in Ancient Greece around 550. Importance In fact, the fable
is one of the oldest and most lasting methods of both written and oral storytelling. They can
be found in the literature of almost all countries and languages, and are a fundamental part
of the folklore of must cultures. Fables are a good way to convey moral meaning because
they are simple in nature and can be easily be read by anyone.
What is Panchatantra ?
The Panchatantra is an ancient Indian collection of interrelated animal fables in Sanskrit
verse and prose, arranged within a frame story.
Summary
Once upon a time, there was a dense forest ruled by a mighty lion named Pingalaka. One
year, during a severe drought, many animals left the forest in search of water. The lion and
his loyal attendants, including two jackals named Karataka and Damanaka, stayed behind.
In the same forest lived a strong bull named Sanjeevaka. One day, while grazing,
Sanjeevaka wandered into a swamp and got stuck. He struggled to free himself but to no
avail. Eventually, exhausted, he lay down, resigned to his fate.
Pingalaka, while on his usual patrol, heard the distant bellowing of Sanjeevaka. He was
initially frightened and decided to investigate the source of the sound. However, upon
hearing the dangerous roars, he decided to retreat to his den and deliberate/think on his next
course of action.
Seeing the lion's hesitation, the cunning jackal Damanaka saw an opportunity to gain favor
with the king. He approached Pingalaka and asked why he looked troubled. The lion
explained that he had heard a fearsome sound and was concerned it might belong to a
powerful enemy.
Damanaka offered to investigate the sound and find out more about this possible threat.
Pingalaka agreed, and Damanaka set off towards the source of the noise. When he found
Sanjeevaka, he realized that the bull was stuck and posed no real threat.
Damanaka, being clever, saw an opportunity to gain a powerful ally for the king and himself.
He approached Sanjeevaka and said, "Why do you bellow so loudly? The king of this forest,
Pingalaka, has heard your cries and is concerned. Who are you, and what brings you here?"
Sanjeevaka explained his difficult situation, and Damanaka offered to help him in exchange
for his loyalty to the lion. Sanjeevaka agreed, and with Damanaka's help, he was freed from
the swamp. Damanaka then took Sanjeevaka to meet Pingalaka.
Pingalaka was initially suspicious, but Damanaka gave guarantee for Sanjeevaka, explaining
how the bull's strength could be an asset to the lion's reign. Over time, Sanjeevaka and
Pingalaka became close friends, and Sanjeevaka's wisdom and strength greatly benefited
the lion's rule.
However, the growing friendship between Pingalaka and Sanjeevaka made Karataka and
Damanaka jealous. Fearing that Sanjeevaka's influence would reduce their own, they
devised a plan to create a fight between the lion and the bull.
Karataka and Damanaka began to sow seeds of doubt in Pingalaka's mind, suggesting that
Sanjeevaka was plotting against him. They told similar lies to Sanjeevaka, claiming that the
lion was planning to attack him. Distrust grew between the once-close friends.
Eventually, driven by suspicion and the jackals' exploit ,Pingalaka confronted Sanjeevaka. A
fierce battle happened, resulting in Sanjeevaka's death. It was only after this tragic event
that Pingalaka realized the deceit of the jackals.
Filled with remorse for the loss of his loyal friend, Pingalaka punished Karataka and
Damanaka for their treachery. The lion learned a valuable lesson about the dangers of
deceit and the importance of trust and loyalty.
This story from the Panchatantra emphasizes the themes of trust, loyalty, and the
destructive power of deceit, teaching readers to be aware of those who might exploit
situations for their own gain.
These themes collectively convey moral lessons about the complexities of relationships, the
importance of honesty, and the impact of deceit and exploitation on trust and friendship.
The fable of the lion and the bull from the Panchatantra, also known as the story of
Pingalaka (the lion) and Sanjeevaka (the bull), is rich with symbolism. Here are some of the
key symbols and their meanings:
2. **Bull (Sanjeevaka)**:
- **Symbol of Strength and honesty**:
Sanjeevaka symbolizes physical strength and moral honesty.His character represents
loyalty, hard work, and the virtues of a good friend and unity
- **Victim of Treachery**: The bull's tragic fate symbolizes the state of the honest and loyal
when caught in the web of deceit and exploitation.
- **Instigators of Conflict**: Their actions show how instigators can create quarrel between
allies and friends for their own benefit.
4. **Forest**:
- **Symbol of the Kingdom or Society**:
The forest represents the kingdom or society in which these characters live. It symbolizes
the larger world where various creatures (people) interact and where the dynamics of power,
trust, and deceit play out.
5. **Swamp**:
- **Symbol of misfortune and Helplessness**:
Sanjeevaka getting stuck in the swamp symbolizes situations of helplessness and
misfortune that can trap even the strong. It also represents the unexpected challenges that
one might meet.
6. **Bellowing Sound**:
- **Symbol of Misunderstood Signals**: The bull's bellowing, which is initially understood as
a threat, symbolizes how signals or actions can be misinterpreted, leading to fear and
misunderstanding.
These vices collectively explain the complex relationship of negative human traits and their
ability to cause harm. The fable serves as a warning tale about the results of allowing such
vices to influence behavior and decisions.It emphasizes the need for honesty, wisdom, and
carefulness in human interactions and relationships.
Fable No 02
Meghavarna the crow and an owl is another tale from the Panchatantra:
Meghavarna: The Crow and the Owl
Summary
Once upon a time, in a dense forest, there was a banyan tree where a wise crow named
Meghavarna lived. Meghavarna was known for his sharp intellect and keen observation
skills. He lived with a large group of crows, all of whom respected him deeply.
In the same forest, there was a colony of owls, led by their king, Arimardana. The crows and
the owls had been enemies for as long as anyone could remember. Their enmity often led to
battles and fights.
One night, under the cover of darkness, the owls decided to attack the crows while they
were sleeping. The crows were unprepared and many were killed. Those who survived were
deeply troubled and wanted Meghavarna's advice on how to protect themselves from future
attacks.
Meghavarna, being wise, knew that a direct fight with the owls would only lead to more loss.
He devised a clever plan to deceive the owls and protect his fellow crows. He gathered the
remaining crows and explained his plan.
The next day, Meghavarna went to the owl's kingdom and pretended to be a deserter from
the crow community. He told Arimardana, the king of the owls, that he had come to offer his
services and betray his own kind because he was fed up with their constant fighting and
disorganization.
Arimardana was initially suspicious about him but was intrigued by Meghavarna's
intelligence and decided to keep him around as an advisor. Meghavarna used his position to
gather information about the owls' plans and weaknesses while pretending to be loyal to
them.
After gaining the trust of the owl king and his ministers, Meghavarna began to indirectly
influence their decisions. He convinced the owls to attack the crows at times and places
where the crows were not present and ensure their safety. The owls thought that they had
the upper hand and followed Meghavarna's advice and wasted their efforts.
Meanwhile, Meghavarna communicated with the crows in secret, ensuring they stayed out of
harm's way. He also instructed them to prepare for a final counterattack when the time was
right.
Eventually, Meghavarna learned of a major attack plan that the owls were preparing against
the crows. He decided it was time to put an end to the fight once and for all. Meghavarna
sent a message to the crows to be ready to attack.
On the night of the planned attack, the owls, under Meghavarna's guidance, flew to what
they believed was the crow's new hiding place. However, Meghavarna had led them into a
trap. The crows were forewarned and well-prepared for surprise attack of the owls and
defeated them finally.
Arimardana and his remaining followers fled the forest, never to return. Meghavarna
returned to his community as a hero, having used his intelligence and cleverness to trick
their enemies and protect his kind.
This fable teaches valuable lessons about the power of intellect, the necessity of planned
thinking, and the benefits of unity and cooperation in overcoming challenges.
The fable of Meghavarna the crow and the owl from the Panchatantra consists of many key
themes. Here are the primary themes:
These themes collectively convey moral lessons about the importance of wisdom, planned
thinking, leadership, trust, and cooperation. They also explain the complex relationship of
cunning, adaptability, and justice in identifying and resolving fights.
The fable of Meghavarna the crow and the owl from the Panchatantra is rich with symbolism.
Here are some key symbols and their meanings:
1. *Crow (Meghavarna)*:
- *Symbol of Wisdom and Cleverness*:
Meghavarna represents intelligence, planned thinking, and adaptability. His ability to trick the
owls symbolizes the triumph of intellect over cruel force.
- *Symbol of flexibility*: The crow's actions symbolize flexibility and the capacity to survive
and thrive even in challenging circumstances.
2. *Owl (Arimardana)*:
- *Symbol of Strength and Aggression*:
The owl represents physical power, aggression, and dominance. The owls' attacks on the
crows symbolize the use of cruel force to achieve goals.
- *Symbol of Overconfidence*: Arimardana and the other owls' underestimation of
Meghavarna symbolizes the dangers of overconfidence and the failure to recognize the
abilities of others.
3. *Forest*:
- *Symbol of the World/Community*:
The forest represents the larger environment or community in which the characters live. It
symbolizes a world where different groups and individuals must navigate relationships,
conflicts, and survival.
4. *Banyan Tree*:
- *Symbol of Safety and Home*:
The banyan tree where Meghavarna and the other crows live symbolizes safety, community,
and a place of refuge. It is a central point of their world and represents stability and unity.
5. *Night*:
- *Symbol of Danger and Concealment*:
The night, during which the owls attack, symbolizes danger and the hidden threats that can
emerge under the cover of darkness. It also represents the time when deceit and cunning
can come into play.
6. *Feigning disloyalty*:
- *Symbol of planned disloyalty*:
Meghavarna's act of pretending to disloyal to the owls symbolizes the use of planned
disloyalty to gather intelligence and protect one's community. It highlights the theme of using
cleverness as a means to an end.
7. *Surprise attack*:
- *Symbol of Justice and punishment*:
The surprise attack set by the crows against the owls symbolizes the ultimate triumph of
strategic planning and justice over cruel force and aggression. It represents the punishment
faced by those who rely only on power without wisdom.
8. *Communication and Secret Messages*:
Through these symbols, the fable conveys deeper moral and moral lessons about the nature
of wisdom, the use of cleverness, the importance of leadership, and the value of trust and
cooperation in overcoming misfortunes. The symbolic elements make it a timeless and
universally relevant story.
Vices
The crow and owl fable consists of many vices through the characters and their actions.
Here are some common vices explained in this fable:
1. *Pride and Arrogance*: Crows are often portrayed as prideful and arrogant. Their
overconfidence can lead to their downfall, as they underestimate the intelligence or strength
of other animals.
2. *Deception*: Both crows and owls may engage in deceit. Crows might use their
cleverness to trick other animals, while owls are known for their wisdom. They might employ
deception to overcome their misfortunes.
3. *Greed*: Greed is another vice commonly described. A crow’s greed can lead it to take
unnecessary risks, while an owl’s desire for control or power might result in immoral
decisions.
4. *Envy*: Envy can drive the actions of these characters. A crow might envy the owl’s
wisdom or the owl might envy the crow’s adaptability and boldness.
5. *Revenge*: Stories sometimes show revenge as a motivating factor.The crow might seek
revenge on owl to teach moral lesson. Owls attack first on crows to disturb their sleep.
These vices serve as moral lessons in fable. They describe the consequences of negative
traits and behaviors. The interactions between crows and owls in these stories typically
convey deeper messages about human nature and mortality
Chitranga approached the eagle and politely asked why he was attacking innocent
creatures. The eagle replied proudly, boasting about his strength and power. He challenged
Chitranga and claimed that he could easily defeat any bird in the forest.
Chitranga was resolute.He proposed a challenge to the eagle. He suggested that each bird
in the forest would bring a stick and drop it at a selected spot. The eagle was confident in his
abilities.He agreed to the challenge.He thought it would be an easy victory.
As planned, all the birds in the forest gathered sticks and dropped them at the selected spot.
When the eagle saw the large pile of sticks, he realized his mistake. He could not lift the pile
of sticks despite of his strength.He could not alone break them.
He realized that he had been tricked by the unity of the birds. The eagle accepted his
defeat. He apologized for his proudness and promised to live peacefully with the other
creatures in the forest from that day forward.
The story of Chitranga and the mighty eagle teaches the importance of unity and
cooperation in overcoming challenges. Despite their individual weaknesses, the birds were
able to defeat the mighty eagle by working together towards a common goal. It explains that
strength lies in unity, and by standing together, even the smallest creatures can overcome
the greatest challenges.
This fable from the Panchatantra emphasizes the timeless moral lesson that unity is a
powerful force that can overcome even the mightiest misfortunes.
Themes
The fable of the Ring Dove and the Mighty Eagle from the Panchatantra is surrounded by
many key themes. Here are the primary themes:
2. *Strength in Numbers*:
- The fable highlights the idea that there is strength in numbers. Despite the eagle's
physical power and superiority, he is unable to overcome the combined efforts of all the birds
in the forest. This theme gives emphasis on the importance of cooperation and teamwork in
achieving success.
5. *Overcoming misfortunes*:
- The story explains that even the smallest and seemingly weakest creatures can
overcome misfortunes when they unite and stand together. It conveys the message that
perseverance, determination, and cooperation.They are important in facing and conquering
challenges.
6. *Conflict Resolution*:
- Ultimately, the resolution of the conflict between the birds and the eagle is achieved
through dialogue, negotiation, and cooperation rather than violence. The fable promotes
peaceful conflict resolution and the importance of finding common ground to resolve fights.
These themes collectively convey moral lessons about the power of unity, the value of
cooperation, the importance of humbleness. Effectiveness of planned thinking in overcoming
hurdles and achieving collective goals is main focus in fable
Symbols
In the fable of the "Ring Dove and the Mighty Eagle" from the Panchatantra, several
elements symbolize deeper meanings and convey moral lessons. Here are the key symbols
and their understanding:
Analysis : This poem explores the deceitful nature of flattery and the dangers of
trusting appearances. The spider's cunning tactics contrast with the fly's initial
caution, highlighting the ease with which one can be manipulated by those who
seek to exploit them. Compared to Iqbal's other works, this poem displays a
similar thematic focus on human nature. However, it is less overtly political and
more focused on individual interactions. It aligns with the time period's interest
in themes of morality and the exploration of human fallibility. The poem's use
of contrasting imagery reinforces its central message. The spider's web is
portrayed as a deceptive paradise, while the fly's wings symbolize its desire for
freedom. The spider's flattery and the fly's eventual entrapment serve as a
cautionary tale about the consequences of succumbing to temptation and the
importance of trusting one's instincts.alysis
Analysis : This poem explores the complex relationship between size and
significance. The mountain, representing grandeur and arrogance, belittles the
squirrel for its small stature and perceived insignificance. However, the squirrel
counters by emphasizing the value of each creature, regardless of size. The
poem ultimately asserts that all beings have their place in God's creation,
challenging the notion of superiority based on physical attributes. The poem's
concise and direct style contrasts with the author's other works, which are often
more elaborate and allegorical. It also reflects the broader context of the time
period, characterized by debates about identity and the search for meaning in a
rapidly changing world. The poem's message of self acceptance and the
rejection of superficial hierarchies resonates with the social and cultural shifts of
the era.lysis:
Analysis : This poem presents a dialogue between a cow and a goat in a verdant
pasture. The cow laments her servitude to humans, expressing fear and
bitterness towards them. However, the goat offers a contrasting perspective,
highlighting the benefits and protection provided by humans.
In contrast to the cow's despair, the goat emphasizes gratitude for the comfort
and security offered by humans. It acknowledges the dangers of the wilderness
and the cow's dependence on human care for survival.
The poem reflects the themes of societal order and human-animal relationships.
It suggests that despite the constraints of servitude, humans provide essential
resources and protection that outweigh the perceived hardships.
Analysis:
The theme of "Sympathy" by Allama Iqbal revolves around empathy,
compassion, and understanding towards others' pain and suffering. In the poem,
Iqbal expresses a deep sense of connection with the struggles and challenges
faced by humanity, urging readers to empathize with one another and extend a
helping hand to those in need. The poem encourages the cultivation of a
sympathetic heart capable of feeling the pain of others and taking positive
action to alleviate their suffering.
Analysis: The poem expresses the speaker's longing for freedom and former
joys, contrasting their current confinement with memories of past happiness.
The imagery of gardens and birds evokes a sense of nature and liberation, while
the cage represents restriction and imprisonment. The speaker's yearning for
companionship and a return to their homeland is palpable.
Compared to the author's other works, this poem exhibits similar themes of
melancholy, loss, and separation. It reflects the author's experiences as an exile
and his longing for his homeland. However, it distinguishes itself with its focus
on the speaker's inner emotions rather than broader political or historical
themes.
In the context of its time period, the poem resonates with the widespread
sentiments of alienation and displacement experienced by many during the
colonial era. The speaker's lament for lost freedom and companionship reflects
the struggles and aspirations of individuals navigating the challenges of living
under foreign rule.
Analysis:
Analysis:
Poem No 08 : Shikwa
شکوہ
( WIth Roman Urdu and English Translation)
Listen to some complaint also from the one accustomed to praise You
But who were the one who raised the sword in Your name?
Banda-o-Sahab-o-Mohtaaj-o-Ghani Ek Huwe
Tere Sarkaar Mein Pahunche Tho Sabhi Ek Huwe
Deserts are merely deserts, we did not spare even the seas
We galloped our horses in the oceans of darkness!
Unmein Kaahil Bhi Hain Ghaafil Bhi Hain Hoshyaar Bhi Hain
There are other communities too, among them are sinners too
There are also hundreds who are disgusted with Your Name
The Outrage is that infidels are rewarded with Houris and palaces
With Your Will the desert’s bosom would produce bubbles of water
Do not complain now that the world has become devoid of Tauheed!
The night's sighs are gone, the dawn's laments are gone
Lailah's pathos is the same, the aspect of Qais too is still the same
In the Najd's desert and mountains the wildness of deer is still the same
The heart of passion is still the same, the Beauty's magic is still the same
The Ummah of the Holy Prophet is the same, You are also the same
Did we make idol making our profession, or did we forsake idol breaking?
We may have lost the restless heart like the compass also
The house is destroyed as You have not remained the glory of gathering
Oh those happy days when You with elegance shall come back
The Others drink wine, seated in the garden, at the edge of the water-channel
In the garden on a side far from the riotous crowd are sitting
The relish for flight has carried away the wingless Nightingale.
[In Persian:] "A stream of blood drips from our ancient longing
(From this verse to the end of the poem Allama Iqbal is referring to himself and his book,
Bang-e-Dara)
The turtledoves have taken flight from the branch of the pine tree,
The petals of the flowers too have withered and become scattered.
Ajmi Khum Hai Tho Kya Mai Tho Hijaazi Hai Meri?
Naghma Hindi Hai Tho Kya Lai Tho Hijaazi Hai Meri?
May the hearts be thirsty again for this same old wine
TEN HIKĀYĀT
From: John T. Platts, The Gulistan; or, Rose Garden of Shaikh Muslihu’d- Dīn Sa’dī of
Shīrāz (London: Wm. II. Allen, 1876).
The selected Ten Hikayats are given Below:
Parable No 01
Title : "Those who make an effort to display their virtues, do the same to conceal their
vices".( Taken from Story VI, (chapter 2): Pg. 83. )
Introduction: A man purposefully eats less and prays more in court to appear pious,
requesting more food within the walls of his home. His son asks him to offer his prayers
again as the one he performed in front of the sultan were meant to impress a mortal, not
God.
Translation of Parable from Persian to English
A devotee was a king's guest. When they sat down to meat, he ate less than he would have
liked; and when they stood 'up to prayer, be said more than was his wont, in order that they
might increase the good opinion' they entertained of him.
COUPLET
O Arab of the desert! thou wilt not. I fear, reach the Ka’ba;
For the road thou art going lead to Turkistan.
When he returned home, he requested the cloth to be laid, that he might partake of food. He
had a son, a sharp fellow: he said, "Father, thou wert at the Sultan's entertainment, didst
thou not eat food?" He replied, “I ate nothing in their sight in order to serve a purpose." He
(the son) 'rejoined, "Say thy prayers again also, for thou hast not done a thing that will serve
thy purpose (hereafter)."
STANZA
Thou who hast Thy virtues exposed in thy open palm.
Thy vices concealed within thy sides!
What wouldst thou purchase, deluded one
in the day of distress, with counterfeit silver?
Parable No 02
Title : "The foundation of injustice in the world began with small unjust deeds"
( Occurs in (chapter 1): XX, Pg. 44 )
Introduction: The Sassanian King Naushirwan and his retinue need salt to roast their hunt.
Before his men leave to get it from a nearby village, he tells them to pay for. He explains that
the smallest action of appropriations by the rich and powerful of the poor and weak lead to
unending trails of confiscations that subsequently plague the entire society.
Translation of Parable from Persian to English
They relate that they were roasting some game for Naushirwan the Just on a certain
hunting-gound. There was no salt. They sent a slave to a village to bring salt. Naushirwan
said, "'rake the salt for payment, in order that a bad custom may not spring up, and the
village be ruined." They said, " What harm can arise from this trifle?” He replied,
“The foundation of injustice in the world was small at first; everyone who came added
thereto, till it has attained to the extreme magnitude (you witness)."
STANZA
If a king eat but an apple from a subject's garden,
His slaves will pull up the tree from its root.
For the half egg which a Sultan deems it right to take by force,
His followers put a thousand fowls on the spit.
COUPLET
The evil-lived tyrant endureth not;
Curses on him are everlasting.
Questions:
A Lesson in JusticeSaadi's Golestan offers a timeless story about a wise king named
Naushirwan and a seemingly trivial act that carries a profound message about justice. While
on a hunting expedition, King Naushirwan and his companions find themselves needing salt
to prepare their meal. They decide to send a servant to a nearby village to acquire some.
Here's where the king's wisdom shines through. Instead of simply taking the salt, King
Naushirwan instructs his men to pay for it.
The Power of Small Actions:The king's insistence on paying surprises his men. They
question the need for such formality over a small amount. This is the crux of the story. King
Naushirwan recognizes the potential consequences of seemingly insignificant acts of
injustice. He explains that if those in power take advantage, even in small ways, it sets a
dangerous precedent.
The Downward Spiral:King Naushirwan uses a powerful metaphor to illustrate his point. He
compares injustice to a foundation. A single act of taking what isn't rightfully yours might
seem unimportant, but over time, as others follow suit, these small injustices accumulate,
leading to a massive structure of corruption that plagues society.
The Couplet and Stanza Amplification:The accompanying poems further emphasize the
king's message. They use vivid imagery to show how a minor act of injustice, like taking a
single apple, can escalate into something much worse, like uprooting the entire tree. This
reinforces the notion that unchecked injustice has the potential to spiral out of control.
The Lesson for Us All:King Naushirwan's story transcends time and culture. It reminds us
that fairness and justice matter, even in seemingly small situations. When those in power
prioritize taking advantage, no matter how minor it seems, it erodes trust and creates a
climate where larger injustices become more likely. The story encourages us all to be
mindful of our actions and strive for fairness in our daily lives.
Parable No 3
Title :"Burden bearing oxen and asses are better that oppressors"
(Story occurs in (chapter 1): XXI, Pg. 45)
Introduction: A royal revenue collector is unfair to the peasantry to fill the treasury and
please the Sultan. Instead of being awarded, he is punished when the Sultan finds out.
Misuse of authority as a right to oppress the weak and helpless eventually brings ruin to the
oppressor. The humble ass and ox are much better than the mighty lion as they serve
humanity and silently bear their burden. Similarly, humility and eagerness to serve others are
qualities appreciated by God, not the ruthless lion-like pride that destroys the destitute.
Translation of Parable from Persian To English
I heard of a revenue collector that he was ruining the peasantry in order to fill the treasury of
the Sultan, unconscious of the dictum of the sages, which they have pronounced, Whoever
afflicts the people that he may gain the heart of the Sultan, God Most High will set those very
people against him to destroy him utterly.
COUPLET
A blazing fire acts not on wild rue1
As the sighs of pained hearts (do on the oppressor).
1According to Persian belief, wild rue, employed in fumigation, neutralizes the influence of
the evil eye.
They say that the chief of all animals is the lion, and the meanest- the ass; and yet,
according to the unanimous opinion of the wise, the burden-bearing ass is better than the
man-rending lion.
DISTICHS
The poor ass, although it is without sense,
Is prized, For the reason that it bears burdens.
Burthen-bearing oxen and asses
Are better than man-tormenting men.
They say that some part of his mal-practices became known to the king by certain
indications; he tortured him on the rack, and put him to death by a variety of punishments.
STANZA
The Sultan’s good pleasure will not be won,
Questions
What is the main theme of the story?
How does the Sultan react to the actions of the revenue collector?
What message does the story convey about humility and service?
Why is the ass considered better than the lion in the story?
This story from Saadi's Gulistan offers a powerful message about the dangers of abusing
authority and the importance of fairness. The story centres on a tax collector who exploits
the peasantry to fill Sultan's treasury and gain his favour. He prioritizes his own gain over the
well-being of the people he is supposed to serve. The story takes a turn when the Sultan
discovers the collector's cruelty. Instead of being rewarded, the collector is punished for his
actions. This emphasizes that true leadership discourages oppression and values fairness.
The story suggests that the sighs and suffering of the oppressed can bring down even the
most powerful figures. It highlights the importance of considering the impact of our actions
on others.
The story uses animals as metaphors to convey its message. It contrasts the humble ass
and the burden-bearing ox with the mighty lion. While the lion is traditionally seen as a
powerful creature, the ass, known for its humility and burden-bearing, is considered superior.
This emphasizes the value of service and humility over arrogance and oppression.
A significant part of the story is the poetry that accompanies the story. The couplet compares
the sighs of suffering people to a blazing fire. It implies that the sorrow of the oppressed has
a more potent impact on their oppressor than fire has on a resilient plant like wild rue. This
suggests that humility and a willingness to serve are more admirable qualities than pride and
the misuse of power. The distiches use vivid imagery and contrasting characters to convey a
powerful message about the importance of just rule and compassion. By portraying the
donkey, valued for its burden-bearing, and the cruel men who torment others, the distich
emphasizes the virtue of service over cruelty. The first stanza then offers practical advice: to
gain favor with a ruler, ensure the well-being of their people. Kindness towards all living
beings is not just good governance but also a path to God's forgiveness. The final stanza
reinforces this theme through a cautionary tale, warning those in power that exploiting others
will eventually lead to consequences. In essence, the poem argues that true power lies not
in domination but in serving others with respect and compassion.
Lessons Learned:
The story criticizes the abuse of power and highlights the importance of fairness and
compassion. It warns that those who oppress others will eventually face consequences.
What does the comparison between the ass and the lion teach us?
This comparison emphasizes the value of humility and service over arrogance and
oppression. Even though the lion is seen as powerful, the ass, with its willingness to serve, is
considered superior.
The Sultan's role is to represent just leadership. His punishment of the tax collector shows
that true authority figures value fairness and hold those who abuse power accountable.
We should strive to treat others with fairness and compassion, avoid using our position (if we
have one) to take advantage of others, and remember that everyone deserves to be treated
with respect.
Parable No. 04
Title :“The pain you give to others eventually finds its way back to you.”
( Taken from Story (chapter 1): XXVII , Pg. 56.)
Introduction: A man oppressed the poor by forcibly purchasing cheap firewood from them
and would sell it for large profits to the rich. One day his home burnt down from a fire with no
apparent reason. A pious man told him that the sighs of helpless people suffering at his
hands were the cause of this calamity.
Contemporary equivalents: "What goes around comes around" & the concept of Karma.
Translation of Parable from Persian To English
They tell of an oppressor that he used to purchase the fire wood of the poor by force, and
give it to the rich at an exorbitant price. A devout man passed by him and said,
COUPLET
Art thou a serpent, that bites every one -whom it sees?
Or an owl, that brings ruin wherever it alights?
STANZA
Thy violence, even if it pass with us
Will not succeed with the Lord to whom all secrets are known,
Do no violence to the dwellers on earth,
The Oppressor and the Sighs of the Poor: A Look at Hikayat XXVII from Gulistan-e-
Saadi
The story, Chapter 1, XXVII, from Saadi's Gulistan-e-Saadi, tells a cautionary tale about the
perils of oppression. A wealthy man exploits the poor, buying their firewood at a pittance and
reselling it to the rich for a hefty profit. A pious man warns him that his cruelty will have
consequences, but the oppressor ignores the advice. One night, a fire erupts in his kitchen,
destroying his possessions. The pious man reappears, suggesting the fire stemmed from the
"sighs of the hearts of the poor," their suffering a result of the oppressor's actions.
● The oppressor embodies greed and arrogance. He prioritizes wealth over the well-
being of others. His refusal to listen to the pious man highlights his moral blindness.
● The pious man serves as a moral compass. He warns the oppressor and highlights
the consequences of his actions.
Themes:
● Karma: The story emphasizes the idea of "what goes around comes around." The
oppressor's suffering is seen as a direct result of his cruelty.
● Empathy: The tale encourages compassion for the less fortunate. It highlights the
impact of oppression on the poor.
● Divine Justice: Though not explicitly stated, the fire can be interpreted as a form of
divine punishment, ensuring a balance is restored.
Narrative Technique:
● The story uses a simple structure with clear cause and effect. The oppressor's
actions lead directly to his downfall.
● Couplets and stanzas are used to deliver wisdom and emphasize key points. These
poetic elements add beauty and memorability to the message.
● The first couplet compares the oppressor to a venomous snake and a destructive
owl, highlighting the harm he inflicts.
● The first stanza warns the oppressor that his actions, while seemingly unpunished
on earth, will be judged by God. It advises against violence and the potential
consequences.
● The second stanza emphasises the power of the "sighs of wounded hearts." It
warns that the suffering of the oppressed will eventually have an impact.
● The final stanza is a historical inscription reflecting on the impermanence of power.
It serves as a reminder that wealth and status are fleeting.
This Hikayat uses a simple story and powerful imagery to convey a timeless message. It
reminds us of the importance of empathy, the consequences of cruelty, and the ultimate
balance of the universe.
Parable no 05
Title : "Power and riches cannot exalt one in status"
Introduction: A king passes by a faqir and becomes angry when the poor man does not
acknowledge him. Upon confrontation, he learns that it is the kings who serve their subjects,
rather than subjects submitting to the rich, as power comes with responsibilities towards the
masses.
Translation of Parable from Persian To English
A Darvesh vowed to celibacy had fixed himself in a desert hook. A king passed by him. The
darwesh, by reason of the high position pertaining to the dominion of content, did not raise
his head, or take any notice. The monarch, because of the high dignity pertaining to royalty,
was incensed, and said, “This tribe of tatterdemalions resemble brutes ; they possess no
civility and humanity. The Vazir approached him and said, “O darwesh! the Sultan of the
whole earth posed by thee; why didst thou not pay him homage, and do what respect
required”?
He replied, “Tell the king to look for homage from one who hopes for favours from him. (Tell
him) moreover, that kings are for the purpose of protecting their subjects, not subjects for the
sake of serving kings.
STANZA
A king is the guardian of the poor,
Even though the benefits flow from the splendour of his empire.
The sheep are not for the benefit of the shepherd;
But ratter is the shepherd for the purpose of tending the sheep.
STANZA
If thou behold one successful,
Thou wilt see another healt-sick with strenuous (but unavailing) effort.
Wait but a few short days, that the dust
May consume the brain of the schemer,
The difference be sovereignty and servitude ceases to be,
When fate’s decree presents itself to view.
Were one to open up the ashes of the dead,
Me could not distinguish the rich man from the poor.”
The argument of the dorwesh appeared sound to the king. He said, "Ask something of me."
He replied, What I request is .this, that another time thou wilt not trouble me." He rejoined, "
Give me Some advice." He replied,
COUPLET
Know, now that these blessings are in thy hands.
That this power and dominion pass from hand to hand.
3. What is the significance of the couplets and stanzas in Story XXIX? How do they
contribute to the overall message of the story?
4. How does Sheikh Saadi use the characters of the king and the darvesh to illustrate
the true purpose of leadership and authority?
5. In Story XXIX, how does the darvesh challenge the conventional understanding of
respect and status? What does this suggest about societal values?
6. Evaluate the king's response to the darvesh's advice in Story XXIX. What does this
tell us about the relationship between power and wisdom?
Common Answer
The hikayat, or story, "XXIX" is taken from the "Rose Garden" (Gulistan) by Sheikh Saadi, a
renowned Persian poet and scholar. This narrative provides a profound commentary on the
nature of power, humility, and the responsibilities that come with wealth and authority. The
story revolves around a king who, during a journey, encounters a darvesh (a devout ascetic).
A King's Misconception:
The story opens with a king, accustomed to the reverence associated with his position,
encountering a darvesh meditating in the desert. Angered by the darvesh's apparent lack of
respect, the king expresses his disdain for the "tribe of tatterdemalions" who lack manners.
A Darvesh's Insight:
The king's advisor, the vizier, intervenes and prompts the darvesh to explain his behavior.
The darvesh delivers a powerful message. He clarifies that those seeking favors from the
king would offer homage, but those like him, living a life of contentment, are not beholden to
such gestures. He further challenges the king's perspective by stating that the true purpose
of a king lies in protecting his subjects, not the other way around.
Themes/Moral:
Several significant themes emerge from this narrative. The foremost theme is the
responsibility of power . The darvesh argues that a king’s role is to serve and protect his
subjects, much like a shepherd tends to his flock. This underscores the idea that leadership
should be exercised with humility and a sense of duty, not with arrogance or entitlement.
Another key theme is the illusion of wealth and power. The story suggests that worldly riches
and authority are transient and do not guarantee true respect or value. This is particularly
highlighted when the darvesh refuses to ask for favors from the king, indicating that spiritual
and moral integrity are more enduring and significant than material wealth.
Sheikh Saadi reinforces the themes with two impactful stanzas. The couplets and stanzas in
the story provide deep philosophical insights into the nature of power and the inevitability of
death. For instance, the stanza stating, "The sheep are not for the benefit of the shepherd;
But rather is the shepherd for the purpose of tending the sheep," emphasizes that the role of
a ruler is to serve, not to exploit. The imagery of the shepherd and sheep is a metaphor for
the duty of care that a leader has towards their people.
Another significant couplet advises the king to recognize the transient nature of his power:
"Know, now that these blessings are in thy hands, that this power and dominion pass from
hand to hand." This reflects the Buddhist notion of impermanence, suggesting that no matter
how powerful one may be, their status and wealth are temporary and will eventually pass on
to others.
Analysis of Characters:
The interaction between the king and the darvesh highlights the contrast between worldly
power and spiritual wisdom. The king’s initial reaction is one of pride and indignation, but
through his conversation with the darvesh, he comes to understand a deeper truth about the
responsibilities that come with power. The darvesh embodies humility and contentment. He
challenges the king’s perception of respect and status and shows that true honor is not
something that can be demanded but must be earned through service and humility.
Conclusion:
Ultimately, the king’s response to the darvesh’s advice reveals a willingness to learn and
grow. This suggests that true wisdom comes not from holding power but from understanding
the impermanence of one's position and the importance of serving others. Sheikh Saadi
uses this story to convey a timeless message about the virtues of humility, the
responsibilities of leadership, and the fleeting nature of worldly power.
Parable No 06
Title: "The fleeing moment of an angry decision has everlasting consequences"
General Questions
1. Examine the moral lessons in Story XXXI from the "Rose Garden" by Sheikh Saadi.
How does the story illustrate the long-term consequences of impulsive decisions?
2. Discuss the interaction between the king and the innocent man in Story XXXI. What
does this exchange reveal about the nature of justice and the burden of guilt?
3. Analyze the significance of the quatrain in Story XXXI. How does it enhance the
story’s message about the effects of anger and regret?
4. How does Sheikh Saadi use the characters in Story XXXI to convey the importance
of wisdom and restraint in leadership?
5. In Story XXXI, how does the innocent man’s plea challenge the king’s perspective
on punishment and responsibility? What does this suggest about the nature of true
justice?
6. Evaluate the king’s response to the innocent man’s plea in Story XXXI. What does
this tell us about the potential for growth and reflection in those who hold power?
Introduction:
Story XXXI from the "Rose Garden" (Gulistan) by Sheikh Saadi presents a powerful
narrative about the far-reaching consequences of impulsive decisions made in anger. Sheikh
Saadi, a notable Persian poet and philosopher, uses this story to explore themes of justice,
guilt, and the moral responsibilities of those in power.
Summary:
The story is about a king who gets very angry and orders an innocent man to be put to
death. Just before he is about to be executed, the man begs the king to think again. He
explains that while his own pain will be short, the king will feel guilty about it for the rest of
his life. The man’s heartfelt words make the king change his mind, and he decides not to kill
the man.
Themes:
The main idea of the story is that quick actions made in anger can have lasting effects. The
innocent man’s plea shows that an angry decision can lead to long-term consequences, not
just for the person who gets hurt but also for the one who causes the harm. The story
teaches us that leaders should think carefully and control their emotions. True justice is
about making fair and thoughtful choices, not about punishing people too quickly.
Another important idea in the story is the weight of guilt. The story shows that the
consequences of unfair actions can heavily affect the person who commits them. At first, the
king acts out of anger, but the innocent man’s words make him think about the moral impact
of what he’s doing, which causes him to change his mind.
The quatrain in the story serves to reinforce its central message. This verse beautifully
describes how life and our feelings, whether good or bad, are temporary. It suggests that
even though the king might think he is harming the innocent man, the real suffering, shown
by his guilt, will actually be felt by the king. The verse points out that unfair and cruel actions
might bring short-term satisfaction, but their moral consequences last much longer.
Analysis of Characters:
The interaction between the king and the innocent man teaches an important moral lesson.
The king's first decision to have the man executed was quick and made out of uncontrolled
anger. However, the innocent man's calm and thoughtful plea challenges the king's sense of
fairness, helping him understand the seriousness of taking an innocent life. This meeting
shows that leaders can learn and grow morally. The king's choice to rethink his decision
demonstrates that even powerful people can learn and change their behavior.
Conclusion:
The king’s reaction to the innocent man’s plea highlights the power of wisdom and humility to
bring about change. By deciding to spare the man’s life, the king shows that true leadership
is not just about using power but also about thinking deeply, showing empathy, and making
fair and moral decisions. Sheikh Saadi's story teaches us an important lesson: the short-
term satisfaction from acting out of anger is far less valuable than the long-lasting peace that
comes from making careful and just choices.
Parable No 07
Title : "A pair of handsworking at one's will are better than those clasped in
obedience, waiting for orders"
( Taken from (chapter 1): XXXVII, Pg. 67)
Introduction: A poor laborer tells his rich brother (who serves the sultan) that he prefers
poverty as although he is poor, his work and self-sufficiency sets him free from bowing down
in front of others. Serving royalty, he says, is a burden as it causes dependency and
ingratitude.
Contemporary equivalent: "Less is more." (Known mostly as associated with Architect
Ludwig Mies who used the phrase to encourage simplicity in style).
Translation of the Parable from Persian to English
There were two brothers; one served the Sultan, and the other earned his bread by the
labour of his own hands. Once upon a time the rich one said to the poor one, “Why dost thou
not take service, so that thou mayst escape the hardship of laboring”? Ho replied, "Why dost
thou not work, that thou mayst find deliverance from the disgrace of serving (a master)?, For
the sages say, It is better to cat barley bread, and sit on the ground, than to fasten on a
golden belt, and stand in waiting,
COUPLET
To knead quick-lime with the hands.
Is better than placing the hands on the breast before a great personage.
STANZA
'T was in this that precious life was spent,—
“What shall I out in summer? What wear in winter?”
O insatiate-belied! content thyself with a single cake of bread
In order that thou mayst not bend thy back in servitude.”
Possible Questions For Above Parable
1. What is the main message of the story involving the two brothers, and how is it
conveyed?
2. How does the story illustrate the concept of self-sufficiency versus dependency?
3. What role does social status play in the story, and how do the characters' views on
it differ?
4. How does the story reflect the value of freedom over wealth?
6. How does the story contrast the lives of the laborer and his brother who serves the
Sultan?
7. In what ways does the story suggest that simplicity and independence are
preferable to wealth and subservience?
8. How does the contemporary equivalent "Less is more" relate to the story?
9. What does the story teach us about the trade-offs between material wealth and
personal freedom?
10. How does the story challenge conventional ideas about success and status?
Introduction:
The story of the two brothers from Sheikh Saadi's "Rose Garden" provides a profound
lesson on the value of self-sufficiency over servitude. One brother serves the Sultan and
enjoys wealth, while the other prefers the simplicity and freedom of laboring with his own
hands. This tale highlights the age-old debate between material success and personal
autonomy.
Brief Summary:
The story is about two brothers who live very different lives. The rich brother works for the
Sultan and has a comfortable life. He tells his poor brother that he should also get a job to
avoid the hard work of manual labor. But the poor brother says he likes his life better
because, even though he's not rich, he gets to stay independent and doesn't have to bow
down to anyone else.
Themes/moral:
The main theme/moral of the story is that freedom and being able to take care of yourself
are more important than being rich and serving others. It shows that real respect comes from
living independently and not needing help from others. The story also talks about being
happy with what you have, living a simple life, and choosing personal freedom over the
desire for material things.
The writer uses impactful pieces of poetry to emphasize the moral lesson conveyed in the
story.
Couplet: The couplet in the story means that working hard with your own hands is better
than having to bow down and serve someone more powerful. It shows that there is dignity in
doing your own work instead of depending on the decisions of those in power.
Stanza: The stanza talks about how it is pointless to always chase after wealth and high
status. It suggests being happy with simple things and that living a humble, independent life
is better than serving others and always worrying about having more luxuries.
Contemporary Relevance:
The contemporary saying "Less is more" aligns well with the story's message. It promotes
the idea that simplicity and minimalism can lead to a more meaningful and fulfilling life,
echoing the story's emphasis on the virtues of a simple, independent existence over the
complexities and dependencies of wealth and status.
Conclusion:
Sheikh Saadi's story questions the usual beliefs about what it means to be successful and
important. It makes a strong case for the benefits of living simply, being happy with what you
have, and valuing personal freedom. The story shows that while having money and a high
social position might make life easier, they can also take away your independence and self-
respect. It encourages us to appreciate being self-sufficient and the respect that comes from
living freely, rather than chasing after temporary comforts and high status.
Parable no 08
Title “It is fruitless to celebrate the death of an enemy as one will never be spared
from it either.” ( Occurs in (Chapter 1): XXXVIII, Pg. 68.)
Introduction: A happy messenger gives the Sassanian King Naushirwan the news of the
death of his enemy. He refuses to rejoice because he realizes that death does not favor
anyone and that he and his all friends will die one day too.
Mian Muhammad Bakhsh (1830-1907): Dushman mare to khushi na Karye, Sajnaa v mar
jana
Translation of the Parable from Persian to English
Someone brought good news to Naushirwan the Just, saying, “God, the Exalted and
Glorious has taken away such and such an enemy of thine.” He replied, “Hast thou heard at
all that He will spare me”?
COUPLET
No room for rejoicing have I in the death of an enemy,
Since my life also enjoys not perpetuity.
1. What is the main message of the story about King Naushirwan and the death of his
enemy, and how is it shown?
2. How does King Naushirwan’s reaction to his enemy's death show his character
and values?
3. What does the story say about the nature of life and death?
4. How does the story challenge the usual reaction to an enemy's death?
5. What is important about the couplet in the story, and how does it connect to the
main message?
6. How does the story highlight the theme of mortality and the certainty of death?
7. In what ways does the story encourage humility and recognition of a universal
fate?
8. How does the story connect to the saying by Mian Muhammad Bakhsh about not
celebrating an enemy's death?
9. What lessons can we learn from King Naushirwan’s response to the news of his
enemy’s death?
10. How does the story promote a different view on enemies and conflicts?
Introduction:
The story of King Naushirwan from Sheikh Saadi's "Rose Garden" offers a thought-
provoking lesson on the nature of life and death and the pointlessness of celebrating when
an enemy dies. When Naushirwan hears the news of his enemy’s death, he responds with a
surprisingly serious and thoughtful comment, showing that death is something everyone
faces.
Brief Summary:
In the story, a messenger brings news to King Naushirwan, happily announcing that one of
his enemies has died. Instead of celebrating, Naushirwan asks a rhetorical question,
wondering if he himself will be spared from death. He emphasizes that being happy about an
enemy’s death is pointless because death is something that will happen to everyone,
including himself and his friends.
Themes:
The main theme of the story is the inevitability of death and how it makes celebrating an
enemy’s death meaningless. It stresses that life is short and that death treats everyone
equally. The story also explores themes of humility, the fact that death is a common fate for
all, and the importance of focusing on one’s own life instead of being happy about others’
misfortunes.
This couplet means that there is no reason to be happy about an enemy’s death because
one’s own life is also not permanent. It highlights the fact that life is short and everyone will
die eventually.
King Naushirwan’s reaction shows his wisdom and understanding of life’s impermanence.
Instead of being happy about his enemy’s death, he thinks about the fact that death will
eventually come for everyone, including himself. His response demonstrates humility and a
deep awareness of the universal nature of death.
The story suggests that death is a great equalizer that affects everyone, no matter their
status or enemies. It challenges the usual reaction of celebrating when an enemy dies by
reminding us that death is inevitable and happens to everyone.
Universal Message:
The story promotes a message of humility and accepting that death is something that
happens to everyone. It encourages people to think about their own mortality and not to take
pleasure in the death of others, recognizing that life is short and death is a shared destiny.
Contemporary Relevance:
The saying by Mian Muhammad Bakhsh, “Dushman mare to khushi na Karye, Sajnaa v mar
jana” (Don’t celebrate when an enemy dies, as friends will die too), fits well with the story’s
Conclusion:
Sheikh Saadi's story of King Naushirwan gives us a timeless lesson about how pointless it is
to celebrate an enemy’s death and how death is something that will happen to everyone. It
encourages us to have a humble view on life and death, recognizing that everyone shares
the same fate. The story teaches us to reflect on our own lives and to appreciate the time we
have, rather than finding joy in the misfortunes of others.
Parable no 09
Title: “Destruction of the good names of the departed cannot protect your own.”
(Chapter 1): XLII, Pg. 74.
Introduction: Alexander the Greek conqueror tells how he won over kingdoms with armies
and riches greater than his own by speaking kindly of their former leaders and kings. Fortune
and power perish, but one’s integrity remains behind if they keep others.
1. What are the main themes in the story of Alexander the Great, and how do they
connect to the idea of integrity?
2. How does Alexander's way of conquering reflect his thoughts on leadership and
respect for previous rulers?
3. Why are the couplet and stanza important in sharing the lesson of the story? How
do they make the story better?
4. What can modern leaders learn from how Alexander said he conquered the East
and West?
5. How does the story show that power and wealth do not last forever? What remains
after these things are gone?
6. How does the story highlight the importance of keeping the good names of people
who have passed away?
Introduction
The story of Alexander the Great as narrated in Rose Garden of Saadi gives us important
lessons about leadership, respect, and the lasting value of integrity. The story describes how
Alexander answered questions about his successful conquests. He highlights his unique way
of ruling and his thoughts on power and legacy. This story, enriched with a meaningful
couplet and stanza, shares key lessons that are still important today.
Brief Summary
In the story, people asked Alexander how he managed to conquer so many lands even
though he had less wealth, fewer years, and smaller armies than the kings before him. He
said his success was due to God’s help and his respectful treatment of the people he
conquered and their former leaders. Instead of speaking badly about the past kings,
Alexander honored their legacy, showing how to lead effectively and morally.
Themes/morals
The main themes/morals of the story include integrity, respect for the past, and the
temporary nature of worldly power. Alexander’s respect for the former kings shows integrity,
suggesting that true greatness comes from honoring others, not from putting them down.
The story also highlights how material wealth and power are temporary and can be
misleading. What truly lasts is the integrity and honor with which one treats others.
The couplet sums up a key lesson of the story: “The wise will not call someone great, / Who
speaks badly about great people.” This means that true wisdom and greatness are shown in
how we talk about others, especially those who have passed away. Respecting their
memory shows real nobility and wisdom.
The stanza further explains this idea: “All these are of no importance, since they fade away, /
Wealth, power, and victories. / Don’t destroy the good name of those who have passed
away, / So that your own good name stays intact.” It means that material things like wealth
and power are not important because they do not last. What really matters is keeping the
honor and dignity of yourself and others, which lasts much longer than physical possessions
and temporary power.
Conclusion
The story of Alexander the Great teaches us valuable lessons about leadership and the
importance of integrity. By speaking kindly of former leaders and respecting the past,
Alexander not only gained conquests but also ensured that his legacy would be remembered
with honor. This story reminds us that while power and wealth may fade, the respect and
integrity with which we treat others remain even after we are gone. Modern leaders and
individuals can learn from Alexander’s approach to leadership, which emphasizes the lasting
importance of kindness and respect for all.
Parable no 10
Title: "Do not turn away from knowledge even if one has to get it from the teachings of
the ignorant."( Occurs in (Chapter 2): XXXVIII, Pg. 124. )
Introduction: A law professor refuses to listen to religious preachers as he believes they
don't practise what they preach. His father tells him to never reject knowledge because of
this alone, as it can be gained despite their ignorance if one makes his own effort to listen
and think.
Translation of the Parable from Persian to English
A law professor said to his father, “None of the fine words of the preachers make any
impression on me, for the reason that I do not see them practising one single thing in
conformity to their preaching.
DISTICHS
They teach people to renounce the world;
They themselves hoard up silver and grain.
The professor of religion who has talk, and nothing else,
Takes no hold of the heart when he speaks.
He is a doctor of religion who does no evil;
Not he who preaches to people, while he himself does not act up to (his preaching).
VERSE FROM THE KORAN
Do ye bid mankind to be pious, and overlook yourselves?
COUPLET
The learned doctor, who seeks to gratify his appetites and pamper his body,
Is himself astray; whom can he guide aright?”
The futher said, “Son! merely on account of this foolish fancy it is not right to turn away the
face from the instruction of monitors, and follow the path of folly, and impute error to the
doctors of religion, and be in quest of a spotless doctor, and so remain excluded from the
advantages of knowledge. Thou art like unto the blind man who one night fell into mire, and
was saying, ‘At least, O Musalmans! place a lamp before my path!' A courtesan heard (him)
and said, ‘What wilt thou, who canst not see the lamp, see by means of the lamp?’ The
meeting-house of preachers is even like the warehouse of cloth-merchants; for in the latter
place thou canst get nothing until thou payest ready money; and in the former place
thou wilt not carry away happiness till thou bring a willing mind.”
STANZA
Listen to the discourse of a learned doctor with the ears of thy soul,
Even if his acts be not like his words:
Vain is that which the adversary says,—
“How can one who is asleep rouse one who sleeps?”
It behoves a man to lend his ear attentively,
Even if counsel be written on a wall.
STANZA
A pious man came from a convent to a school,
Broke the bond of the Sufi communion.
I said, “What was the difference between a doctor and a devotee,
That thou hast preferred the former to the latter?”
He replied, “The latter saves his own blanket from the wave,
While the former exerts himself to save the drowner.”
General Questions For Above Parable
1. What are the main themes in the story of the law professor and his father, and how
do they relate to the value of knowledge?
2. How does the law professor's view of religious preachers reflect his attitude
towards learning?
3. Why are the couplet and stanzas important in sharing the lesson of the story? How
do they add to the overall message?
4. What lessons can modern learners take from the father's advice about gaining
knowledge?
5. How does the story highlight the importance of seeking knowledge no matter
where it comes from?
6. How does the story show the difference between appearances and true wisdom?
Introduction
The story has been taken from Chapter 2 of The Rose Garden of Saadi. It is about a
conversation between a law professor and his father. It teaches us the importance of
seeking knowledge, even if the source is not perfect. The story includes a couplet, verses
from the Quran, and several stanzas that highlight the value of wisdom. It warns us not to
dismiss knowledge just because the person teaching it may not be perfect. This story offers
important lessons about the value of being open-minded and seeking knowledge from all
places.
Brief Summary
In the story, the law professor does not like listening to religious preachers. He thinks that
they do not practice what they preach, which makes their words meaningless to him. His
father, however, tells him that he should not reject knowledge just because of the preachers'
faults. The father explains that valuable lessons can still be learned if one listens with an
open mind and thinks carefully about the teachings. The father's advice shows that wisdom
can be found even in places we might not expect, and we should be willing to learn from
everyone.
Themes/Moral
The main themes/morals of the story are the value of knowledge , the importance of being
open-minded , and the difference between appearance and true wisdom . The story shows
that we should not ignore knowledge just because the teacher is flawed. The law professor's
attitude shows the risk of judging teachings based on the teacher's behavior, rather than the
value of the teachings themselves. The father’s advice emphasizes the need to be open-
minded and to learn from all sources, even those that are not perfect.
The couplet: “The learned doctor, who seeks to satisfy his desires and take care of his body,
/ Is himself lost; whom can he guide right?” criticizes those who, despite their knowledge,
focus on selfish desires. It questions the credibility of people who preach about being good
but do not follow their own advice.
The stanza: “Listen to the words of a learned person with the ears of your soul, / Even if his
actions do not match his words: / It is foolish to say, / ‘How can someone who is asleep
wake up another who is asleep?’ / A person should listen carefully, / Even if wisdom is
written on a wall.” This stanza tells us to focus on the wisdom in the words, not on the faults
of the speaker. It suggests that we can learn valuable lessons even from teachers who are
not perfect if we listen with an open mind.
The second stanza: “A religious man left a holy place to go to a school, / He broke away
from the Sufi community. / I asked, ‘Why did you choose a scholar over a holy person?’ / He
replied, ‘The holy person saves himself from danger, / While the scholar tries to save others
from trouble.’” This stanza compares the roles of religious people and scholars. It suggests
that while the religious person focuses on saving himself, the scholar works to help others,
highlighting the importance of sharing knowledge.
Conclusion
The story of the law professor and his father teaches us important lessons about learning. It
shows that we should not ignore valuable teachings just because the teacher is not perfect.
The father’s advice reminds us to keep an open mind and to learn from all sources, even if
they have flaws. The story emphasizes that true learning involves finding valuable lessons in
all teachings, even from those who do not always live up to the ideals they teach. Modern
learners can learn from this story the importance of being open to knowledge and thinking
critically about what they learn.
setbacks, including the lack of royal patronage and financial difficulties, Ferdowsi remained
steadfast in his commitment to completing the Shahnameh, which he saw as a labor of love
and a tribute to the greatness of his homeland.
Today, Ferdowsi's legacy endures not only through his monumental work, the Shahnameh,
but also through his profound impact on Persian literature, language, and cultural identity.
His poetic genius and devotion to his craft have secured his place as one of the most
celebrated figures in Persian literary history.
Significance of the Shahnameh
The Shahnameh holds immense significance as a monumental work of Persian
literature and culture for several reasons:
1.Preservation of Myths and Legends: The Shahnameh is like a big treasure chest holding
ancient stories from Iran. Ferdowsi carefully gathered these tales about heroes, battles, and
famous people. By doing this, he made sure Iranians would always remember their culture
and history. He helped to preserve the cultural identity of Iran and its people.
2. Historical Documentation:
Beyond its mythological content, the Shahnameh also chronicles the historical events and
achievements of Iran's kings and rulers, from mythical figures like Jamshid and Kai Khosrow
to historical monarchs like Cyrus the Great and Darius the Great. While the Shahnameh is
not a strictly factual historical account, it provides valuable insights into the political, social,
and cultural landscape of ancient Iran.
3. National Identity and Pride:
The Shahnameh has played a central role in shaping the collective consciousness and
national identity of the Iranian people. Its tales of heroism, valor, and sacrifice have inspired
generations of Iranians and instilled a sense of pride in their cultural heritage
4. Literary Excellence: Ferdowsi was good at telling stories and writing poetry, that is why
the Shahnameh is considered as one of the greatest works of world literature. The book is
full of beautiful words,
imagery, and symbolism that continues to captivate readers and scholars alike. Ferdowsi's
skillful use of metaphor, allegory, and rhythm elevates the Shahnameh more than just a
history book—it's like a masterpiece of art.
5. Influence and Legacy:
The Shahnameh's influence extends beyond the borders of Iran, shaping the literary
traditions of neighboring cultures and civilizations. Its stories have been adapted, translated,
and retold in various languages and art forms, including literature, music, theater, and visual
arts. As a testament to its enduring legacy, the Shahnameh remains a source of inspiration
for artists, and scholars around the world.
The Shahnameh, composed by Ferdowsi: Having three main parts:
The Shahnameh, composed by Ferdowsi over several decades in the 10th and 11th
centuries, is structured into three main parts: the mythical, the legendary, and the historical.
Each part encompasses distinct periods of Iranian history and mythology, creating a
comprehensive narrative that spans from the dawn of creation to the Islamic conquest of
Persia. Here's a breakdown of each part:
1. The Mythical Part
This section delves into ancient Iranian mythology, including stories of creation, the reign of
mythical kings like Jamshed and the epic battles between the forces of good and evil.
Key themes in this part include the struggle between order and chaos, the ascent and
downfall of heroic figures, and the establishment of societal norms and customs.
2. The Legendary Part
The legendary part focuses on the heroic age of Iranian history This section features
legendary heroes such as Rostam, Sohrab, and Siavash, who go on big adventures and
fight in huge battles.
Themes of loyalty, courage, honor, and familial bonds are prominent in this part
3. The Historical Part:
This section provides a semi-historical account of Persian kings such as Cyrus the Great,
and Alexander the Great
Themes of power, ambition, conquest, and the cyclical nature of history are mentioned in
this part, reflecting the complexities of human civilization.
Overall, the structure of the Shahnameh reflects Ferdowsi's ambitious vision to create a
comprehensive epic that encompasses the entirety of Iranian history and mythology. By
dividing
the narrative into three distinct parts, Ferdowsi provides a multifaceted exploration of Persian
identity, culture, and legacy, weaving together myth, legend, and history into a timeless
tapestry of human experience.
The major themes highlighted throughout Ferdowsi's masterpiece:
The Shahnameh, being an epic poem of immense depth and breadth, explores numerous
themes that resonate across time and culture. Here are some of the major themes
highlighted throughout Ferdowsi's masterpiece:
1. Heroism:
Central to the Shahnameh is the theme of heroism, embodied by legendary figures such as
Rostam, Sohrab, and Siavash. These heroes display extraordinary courage, strength, and
skill in their battles against brave adversaries, earning them praise and admiration. Through
their heroic deeds, the Shahnameh describes the courage and resilience and valor of human
nature in the face of adversity.
2. Loyalty and Duty:
Loyalty to family, king, and country is a recurring theme in the Shahnameh. Characters like
Rostam exemplify loyalty to their rulers and kin, often sacrificing their own desires and safety
for the greater good. Loyalty is portrayed as a noble virtue that binds individuals together
and upholds the social order.
3. Justice and Morality:
The Shahnameh grapples with questions of justice, morality, and the consequences of one's
actions. Characters face moral dilemmas and ethical choices, often grappling with the
conflicting demands of duty, honor, and personal integrity.
4. The Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil: The Shahnameh tells stories about the
fight between good and bad, with heroes like Rostam battling against evil demons, bad
rulers, and tricky enemies. They try hard to do what's right and beat the bad people. This big
fight represents how people everywhere want to understand what's good and find inner
peace.
5. Fate and Destiny: In the Shahnameh, characters deal with the idea of fate and how
things are meant to happen. Predictions, signs, and feelings about the future affect what
characters do and how history unfolds. Some accept their fate, while others try to change it,
but they all face fate bravely, even if they can't control it.
7. Legacy and Tradition:
The Shahnameh honors Iran's rich culture and history by keeping alive its myths, stories,
and history for the next generations. Characters in the stories work hard to respect their
ancestors' memories and keep their civilization's values alive, making sure their culture stays
strong and remembered.
These themes, among others, contribute to the richness and complexity of the Shahnameh,
offering readers profound insights into the human condition and the timeless struggles of the
human spirit. Through its epic tales of heroism, love, and destiny, Ferdowsi's masterpiece
continues to captivate and inspire audiences around the world.
purposes. Iranians in the diaspora retell some of its many episodes to their children to
transmit a distinctly Persian way of life.
The Shah-nama is full of maxims, adages, reflections on life’s fluctuations, love stories and
ponderings on the conundrum of death. It also devotes much attention to the relationships
between man and woman, parent and child, and between the kings and their subjects.
Ferdowsi’s main purpose is to recount a heroic story, but he interjects subtle and unresolved
questioning about these relationships giving several episodes a tragic character. Perhaps
the most popular story in the epic recounts how the Iranian Hercules, Rostam, unwittingly
kills his own son Sohrab. A millennium later, Persian speakers still wrestle with this tragic
ending, especially because Rostam is a model of magnanimity, chivalry and patriotism.
Plot:
The plot is intriguing, full of reflections on characters’ decisions with weighty consequences.
Rostam is patrolling the border of Iran when his horse is stolen. He goes to enemy territory,
Turan, in search of his horse. The local ruler receives him generously and promises to find
the horse. He invites Rostam to stay for a night. Rostam accepts. When night comes on, he
withdraws to his room. The princess Tahmine secretly joins him and reveals that she is in
love with him and that she desires a child from him. They spend the night in loving embrace.
Rostam gives her a bracelet and tells her that if the child is a daughter she should fasten it in
the girl’s hair and if it is a boy, she should put the bracelet on his arm. The next morning,
Rostam’s horse is found and he returns to Iran. A son is born and named Sohrab. When he
becomes older, he is anxious to be reunited with his father. He goes to Iran with an army,
hoping to see his father and to place him on the throne of Iran. The Persian generals
conceal Sohrab’s identity from Rostam. They fight several times. When they meet, Sohrab
asks Rostam to reveal his identity, which Rostam refuses, according to the rules of chivalry.
In the first fight, the young Sohrab throws Rostam down, but a feeling of compassion
overcomes him. In the next combat, Rostam throws Sohrab down. Fearing that the young
warrior might stand up, he immediately thrusts his dagger into Sohrab’s side. The dying
Sohrab says that his father, Rostam, will avenge him, even “if he becomes a fish in the sea
or, becoming the night, disappears in darkness.” This is how Rostam learns the identity of
his son.
Summary:
The hero Rostam lived in Zabulistan, and was one of the favorites of King Kaykavous. Once,
following the traces of his lost horse Rakhsh, he enters the kingdom of Samangan, where he
becomes the guest of the king during his search. There, Rostam meets princess Tahmina.
She admires Rostam and knows of his reputation. She goes into his room at night and asks
if he will give her a child, and in return, she will bring his horse. Rostam leaves after he
impregnates Tahmina and his horse is returned. Before he leaves, he gives her two tokens:
a jewel and a seal. If she has a girl, she is to take the jewel and plait it in the girl's hair. If she
has a boy, she is to take the seal and bind it on the boy's arm.
Nine months later, Tahmina bears his child—a son, whom she names Sohrab. Years go by
before Rostam and Sohrab finally meet—the war between Zabulistan and Turan is on the
horizon. The two armies face each other and prepare for the imminent battle. By then,
Sohrab has become known as the best fighter in the Turan army. But Rostam's legend
precedes him and the Turan army cowers before the hero. No one else dares to fight
Rostam, so Sohrab is sent to wrestle with the legendary hero. Though Sohrab knows his
father' name, he is unaware that the man before him is Rostam. On the battlefield, Rostam
and Sohrab fight for what seems like an eternity, neither knowing the true name of his
opponent.
In the first fight, Sohrab defeats Rostam, but Rostam tricks Sohrab and says: “Young man,
don't you know that the law of war is that you can kill me after defeating me twice?” Then,
after praying to Dargah Yazdan, Rostam asks for his help in defeating the young warrior. In
the second fight, after a very long and heavy bout of wrestling, Rostam breaks Sohrab's
back and stabs him. Sohrab, now dying, tells Rostam that his father will avenge his death.
He shows him the armband amulet Rostam once gave to Tahmina, who gave it to her son to
keep him safe during the war, and only then does Rostam realize his identity. Rostam
grieves heavily and sends Goudarz to get medicine, (Panacea) but it comes too late. When
Tahmina finds out her son is dead, she burns Sohrab's house and gives away all his riches.
The story ends as "the breath departed from out her body, and her spirit went forth after
Sohrab her son."
Detailed Summary:
Rustam was the king of Zabulistan and a trusted helper of the Iranian emperors. One day
Rustam went hunting to his favourite hunting ground on the border between Iran and Turan.
Tired, he went off to sleep leaving Raksh to graze on his own. Some soldiers of the king of
Samangan saw a handsome horse roaming about and with great difficulty 8-10 soldiers
overpowered the horse and took him to the king’s stable expecting a handsome reward for
capturing such a beautiful horse.
When Rustam woke up, and did not seem Rakhsh, he realised that something was amiss.
Moving around, he saw marks of a struggle, and on following the footmarks of the horse and
the people, he reached Samangan city. Word soon spread that a distraught Rustam was in
Samangan, and it was not long before the king of Samangan sent for Rustam.
On reaching the palace, Rustam told the king about his lost horse and the king assured him
all help possible to find his steed. However, till that was done, he asked him to enjoy his
hospitality to which Rustam readily agreed.
A feast was ordered in Rustam’s honour, after which Rustam went to sleep. When two-thirds
of the night had passed, Rustam was woken up by a creek of his door. E saw a beautiful
maiden entering his room with a maid. She told Rustam that she was tehmina, the princess
of Samangan and since long she loved the great Rustam on account of his immense deeds
of bravery. She requested Rustam to marry and him and assured Rustam of her loyalty.
Rustam too was smitten by the beautiful and wise Tehmina. He sent for a wise man who
conveyed the desire of the two to get married to the king. The king too was very happy at
this happy tiding and a laish traditional marriage was arranged for the two.
Rustam stayed in Samangan for a few weeks. His Rakhsh too was found. Rustam spent
some loving days with Tehmina but soon realized that it was time for him to leave. When
Rustam informed Tehmina about hi departures, she informed him that she was carrying their
child. Rustam was overjoyed at this news but he had to go. He gave a gemstone to
Tehmina, requesting her to tie it in the hair, if the child was a baby girl, and on the forearm if
the baby was a boy. Then with ha heavy heart, Rustam ascended on his steed and bade her
a tearful farewell.
Birth of Sohrab
In due course of time, Tehmina gave birth to a cherubic baby boy, and name him Sohrab.
The child, like his father, was a big, handsome baby. As he grew up, he kept inquiring with
his mother about the identity of his father, but the mother always managed to evade the
answer.
When Sohrab came into his teens, Tehmina was unable to keep off his persistent queries
about his father and ancestry. She finally confided to him and revealed that he was the son
of the world renowned Hero Rustam, the grandson of Zal and the great grandson of Sam. To
further attest the truth to the almost unbelieving son, she showed some of Rustam’s effects
like his dagger and some jewels and gave them to Sohrab.
Sohrab was jubilant on knowing his magnificent ancestry. He asked his mother, why she had
kept it a secret from him for so long.
The mother revealed that she feared that the father may call him for warfare and the son
may prefer to go to him to train in the martial arts, and she would have been left lonely and
heartbroken. She was living without her husband, she did not want to live without her son.
Hence she had hidden the fact of the identity from both the father and the son.
She further cautioned Sohrab against the treacherous Afrasiyab and his army and asked to
stay away from them.
Sohrab was bubbling with ambition. Unaware of the ways of the world, the young and
immature youth, overconfident of his strength and ability, immediately declared that he would
garner a huge army, defeat King Kae Kaus of Iran and instate his father as the king and his
mother as the queen of Iran.
With the help of Turanian king Afrasiyab, Sohrab gathered an army and went towards Iran to
search for his father.
All was going well for King Kae Kaus when he received a letter from Gazdam, the care-taker
of the fort of Sapid, which was on the border between Iran and Turan. A young lad of 14 by
the name of Sohrab, who hailed from Turkistan, had come with the army from Turan. He was
creating havoc and was unstoppable. His facial features resembled Rustam and he seemed
to be of the family of Nariman.
Hazir, son of Gudarz, who was the custodian of the fort, was defeated and imprisoned by
sohrab within the blink of an eye. Gazdam requested for instant help from the king,
dispatched a messenger at night through a secret route and he himself with his family fled
the fort at night. The next morning Sohrab entered the fort without any difficulty or
opposition.
When King Kae Kaus received Gazdam’s message, he realised the urgency of the situation
and immediately called a conference of his trusted warriors Toos, Keshvad, Gudarz, Giv,
Gurgin, Behram and Farhad and appraised them of the situation. It was unanimously
decided in the conference that Rustam was the only person who could contain the might of
Sohrab and save the Iranians, and so they selected Giv to be urgently sent to Zabulistan to
summon Rustam.
King Kae Kaus prepared a hasty letter and dispatched it to Rustam. In the letter, he first
lauded the services of Rustam and his family to Iran, and then requested him to urgently
come to the aid of his country. He dispatched Giv and advised him to come back
immediately with Rustam without even waiting to rest. Giv immediately set off for Zabulistan
and did not wait anywhere on the way either for eating or resting.
On reaching Zabulistan, he gave the urgent message of summons, but Rustam was not
willing to go immediately, as he believed that he was not a servant of the king to go at his
beck and call. He asked Giv to wait till he was ready. Three days passed during which Giv
repeatedly reminded Rustam that the fury of the king would know no bounds if they were
late, but Rustam was in no mood to relent. Finally on the fourth day, they set off for Iran.
As soon as Giv and Rustam reached the palace, they went to see the king. However the
king was fuming with anger because of the long delay. He fired Rustam by saying, “Who do
you think you are that you disobey the king’s orders and place your own whims before the
interests of the country”. Then, in a fit of anger he ordered Toos to take Giv and Rustam to
the gallows and hang them.
This insult was too much for the great Rustam. As he was fuming with rage, Toos
approached him to pacify him and take him away from the temperamental king. However, a
furious Rustam jerked away the great warrior Toos, who was hurtled away like a small child.
Rustam reminded the king in no uncertain terms that he was alive and on the throne just
because of him. He told the king, “Don’t think you are my master or provider – God alone is
my provider. My horse Rakhsh is my throne, my mace is my seal and my helmet is my
crown, I don’t need anything else.” He hastily he left the palace telling the other paladins to
fend for themselves and their country as he was leaving Iran forever.
The paladins were very upset with their king for insulting and infuriating the great Rustam.
They once again approached the senior paladin Gudarz for a solution to this problem. The
aged warrior went to the king and reproached him for being rude to Rustam, who had
several times saved the king from certain death.
Gudarz told the king that he will now be responsible for Iran’s plight as Gazdam had clearly
indicated in his letter that no paladin except Rustam would be capable of taking on the might
of Sohrab. He once again chided the king for loosing his cool instead of handling the
situation delicately and wisely.
The reconciliation :
King Kae Kaus once again realised his folly. He agreed with Gudarz and sent an apology to
Rustam. Some of the paladins along with Gudarz carried the king’s message to Rustam and
asked him to forgive the king, who, though ill tempered was good at heart and had a noble
disposition. Rustam was also told that by leaving Iran he was not punishing the king, but the
entire nation, as it will be the people who would have to bear the brunt of the attack of the
Turanians. Rustam however was very firm. He maintained that he was not a servant of the
king and the king had no business to treat him so rudely.
When Rustam was not convinced, Gudarz tried another stratagem to convince him. He tried
to appeal to the vanity of Rustam by telling him that the king, soldiers and people of Iran
were thinking that he had left Iran because he is afraid to face the young paladin of
Turkistan. All the soldiers and paladins think that if the great Rustam is not ready to face this
young paladin they stand no chance before him, and so all are deciding to desert the war
and flee. This argument touched a chord in Rustam’s heart and after some further
persuasion he agreed to return to Iran.
As soon as the King Kae Kaus received the message that Rustam had agreed to come back
to Iran, he was jubilant. He made elaborate preparations for receiving Rustam, and when he
finally arrived, the king greeted him with profuse apologies. He asked forgiveness for his
rudeness and blamed his natural disposition for his uncouth behaviour and fits of anger.
Thereafter both the king and Rustam accepted each other’s respective superior positions
and the king declared a feast to commemorate the reconciliation.
Immediately the following day, the Iranian soldiers along with Rustam and other paladins
marched towards the fort of Sapid which Sohrab had captured and where the Turanian army
was stationed.
When Homan, the Turanian commander, and Sohrab saw from the fort that the Iranian army
was approaching, Homan was distressed and tense, but Sohrab was confident of himself
and his ability to fight against any warrior. He was also excited on the prospects of meeting
his father Rustam.
Death of Zindeh-razam :
The Iranian army was stationed some distance away from the fort of Sapid. At dusk, Rustam
decided to go to the fort in disguise to take stock of the situation in the enemy camp and get
any information possible. He hid in a dark corner and spotted Sohrab sitting calmly
discussing the stratagems of war. He was flanked on one side by the Turanian commanders
Barman and Homan and on the other side was his maternal uncle Zindeh-razam, who was
the prince of Samangan. He was specially sent by Tehmina, the mother of Sohrab to identify
Rustam and facilitate the meeting between the father and the son.
Zindeh-razam saw some movement in the distant corner where Rustam was hiding so he
went to investigate. Rustam was not able to identify Zindeh-razam in the darkness. Zindeh-
razam too saw the silhouette of Rustam but failed to identify him, and tried to raise an alarm.
Rustam immediately silenced him and dealt a powerful blow on his neck, rendering him
lifeless. Thus was gone the only link who would have identified the father to the son.
When Sohrab realised that Zindeh-razam had not returned since a long time, he sent an
attendant, who returned with the tragic news of the death of Zindeh-razam. Sohrab was
grieved at this loss and immediately realised that an intruder had entered the palace. He told
his men to prepare for the war and decided to launch an attack the following day.
Rustam returned to his camp and gave the news of war preparations in the enemy camp to
King Kae Kaus. He even described the grandeur of Sohrab to the king and other Iranian
paladins and asked them to be prepared to face an attack any time from the Turanians.
The following day, Sohrab mounted his black horse and climbed to a strategic point from
where he could take stock of the Iranian army. He called Hazir, the commander of the fort of
Sapid whom he had imprisoned, and asked him to identify the different tents with the hope
that he may get some clue to the identity of Rustam. Hazir properly identified the tents of all
other paladins, but when he came to the tent of Rustam , he lied that the tent was that of a
newly recruited warrior from China. Hazir’s intention was to protect Rustam – the greatest
asset of the Iranian army, from any unsuspecting attack by the enemies. Sohrab was
dejected that he could not get any information about Rustam.
Thereafter, Sohrab sped off alone towards the Iranian camp and went straight to King Kae
Kaus’s tent where he challenged the king to send any of his warriors to fight him. King Kae
Kaus was terrified by the gigantic looks of Sohrab and immediately sent Toos to summon
Rustam to take on this great warrior. On receiving the urgent message in his tent, Rustam
immediately prepared himself and set off for the battlefield.
Both the great warriors -Sohrab and Rustam – came face to face with each other, and
decided to go to a secluded place for a duel. While on the way, Sohrab felt affection towards
Rustam and asked him whether he was Rustam. In order to put him off guard Rustam
replied that he was a very small warrior in comparison to the great Rustam.
The two great warriors went to a secluded place and started their duel, first with spears and
swords, and then with mace and bow-arrows. The duels between the two were so fierce that
their weapons got worn out and their horses became tired, but none proved superior to the
other. Finally, at dusk they stopped the duel for the day and decided to meet again the next
day for a weaponless duel.
Rustam had never faced such stiff competition ever before. He was feeling frail and weak.
He was dejected to such an extent that he even sent a message to King Kae Kaus not to
continue the war in event of his death, because no one in Iran would be able to match the
strength of Sohrab.
On the other hand Sohrab was feeling guilty for the duel firstly because of the age difference
and secondly because he was feeling a strange attachment towards Rustam. He dreaded
the possibility of actually fighting against his own father.
Within no time Sohrab flung Rustam to the ground and sat on his chest. As he was about to
pierce his heart with a dagger, Rustam played a trick on him. He stopped Sohrab saying that
it was against Iranian rules of war to strike the opponent the first time he is flung to the
ground. Sohrab took this to be true, and partly due to his bravery and partly due to his large
heartedness, let Rustam go. It was only when Sohrab returned to his camp and narrated the
incident to Homan that he came to know that he was deceived.
On the other hand, Rustam was shaken by the happenings of the day. He prayed to God
and asked back for the strength, which he had voluntarily surrendered when his feet had
started sinking in the ground due to the weight of his body. He got back his strength, and
reinvigorated met Sohrab the next day in a hand to hand combat.
With renewed strength Rustam started fighting Sohrab, and soon got an upper hand over
him. At the first opportunity he toppled Sohrab on the ground and before the winking of an
eye thrust a dagger in his heart. This took the young warrior by surprise, as he had expected
a reprieve for the first time. He cried foul against Rustam and lamented that now he would
have to end his life without being able to see the face of his beloved father, to find whom he
had undertaken this campaign. He, however, warned Rustam saying that he had killed him
by treacherous means, and when his father Rustam would find this out he would seek him
out from anywhere in the world and take revenge.
Rustam was shocked to hear this. He asked Sohrab about any evidence that he was
Rustam’s son and Sohrab ripped open his armour and showed him the gemstone, which
was tied to his arm. This was the same gemstone which Rustam had given to his wife
Tehmina and instructed her to give it to their child for identification. When Rustam saw the
gemstone he took the head of his son in his lap and screamed in agony. He was
inconsolable when he realised that he himself had brought about the death of his son.
When Rustam did not return to the Iranian camp by evening, the other paladins became
worried and went searching for him. On seeing Rustam’s horse standing alone in a corner,
they jumped to the hasty conclusion that he might have been killed in the duel by Sohrab
and immediately rushed to King Kae Kaus to give him the news. King Kae Kaus immediately
sent a messenger to the Turanian camp to ascertain the fate of Rustam.
However, it was Sohrab who was breathing his last. The young warrior was however happy
and contented that he had finally found his father. He made a final request to Rustam to
spare the Turkish and Turanian soldiers as now without him they would be rudderless and
will not be able to fight the mighty Iranian warriors.
Rustam immediately set off to fulfill his son’s last wish. When the Iranian camp saw Rustam,
they heaved a sigh of relief, but were worried to see him in such a disheveled state with
clothes torn and eyes red with tears. Rustam narrated the unfortunate incident of his having
stabbed his own son with his own hands. The entire Iranian camp was shocked at hearing
this news. Rustam sent his brother Zavareh to Homan, the Turanian commander, to relay
him the tragic news. Homan, who had nurtured Sohrab in the arts of warfare, was also
stunned by this news. He put the blame of the whole tragedy on Hazir who had knowingly
concealed the identity of Rustam from Sohrab.
Zavareh returned to the Iranian camp and informed Rustam that Hazir was the culprit behind
this tragedy. Mad with rage, Rustam rushed to even scores with Hazir. He was about to kill
him when other warriors intervened and pacified Rustam to spare Hazir as whatever he had
done, was with good intentions. Rustam let off Hazir and immediately sped off along with
Toos, Gudarz and Gastaham towards his wounded son.
Suddenly Rustam realised that King Kae Kaus had a medicine by the name ‘Noshdaru’
which healed the worst of wounds. He requested Gudarz to get it urgently. When Gudarz
went to King Kae Kaus and requested him to give the medicine, the king declined to give it
as he feared that if Sohrab survived, than the father and son would form a formidable duo.
He suspected that the two may get together, topple his rule and snatch his throne away from
him. Gudarz returned to Rustam and asked him to go personally and request the king for the
medicine. As an anguished Rustam set out to go, he received the news that Sohrab was no
more in the world.
The news of Sohrab’s death at his own hands was too much for Rustam to bear. He grieved
and sobbed uncontrollably. He requested the other paladins who were sharing his grief to
request the king to announce the end of war as per the last wishes of Sohrab.
The lifeless body of Sohrab was taken to Zabulistan where his grandparents Zal and
Rodabeh too broke down on seeing the young and handsome Sohrab lying in a state of
eternal rest. Rustam had a new Dakhma (Dakhma – an open round structure where dead
bodies of Mazdayasnis/Zoroastrians are exposed to the elements) erected in the shape of a
horseshoe and laid the body of his son it.
The news of Sohrab’s death spread like wild-fire all around the world. In Turan, Homan
delivered the news to Afrasiyab who too was grieved at this sudden death. In no time, the
tragic news reached the King of Samangan who conveyed the same to Tehmina, the young
mother of Sohrab. Tehmina who was excitedly preparing for the return of her young son
along with his father was shattered at this news. She could not come to terms with the fact
that her young promising son was now a lifeless lump of flesh.
In a mad frenzy, she destroyed everything that reminded her of Sohrab. Unable to bear the
pain, she often lapsed into unconsciousness. She donned a black dress and passed her
days in a dazed state. Unable to bear the shock, she too passed away within a year of her
son’s death.
Short Questions
– While Sohrab and Rostam are legendary figures in Persian mythology, the story is fictional.
– The tale explores themes of fate, familial conflict, and the tragic consequences of
miscommunication and betrayal.
– Yes, variations of the tale are found in different Persian literary works and oral traditions.
– It serves as a cultural touchstone, reflecting the Persian people’s values, beliefs, and collective
identity.
5. **How has the story of Sohrab and Rostam influenced literature and art?**
– It has inspired countless poets, writers, and artists across generations, shaping the artistic
landscape of Persian culture and beyond.
6. **Is prior knowledge of the Persian language required to enroll in Shahnameh classes at Danaa
School?**
– No prior knowledge of the Persian language is required. Our Shahnameh classes are designed to
be accessible to students of all language levels, and our instructors will guide you through the
material clearly and engagingly.
7. **Are there any age restrictions for enrolling in Shahnameh classes and learning Farsi at Danaa
School?**
– No, there are no age restrictions for enrollment. Danaa School welcomes students of all ages
eager to explore Persian culture and literature. Whether you’re a high school student looking to
expand your horizons or an adult learner interested in discovering new passions, you’ll find a
supportive and inclusive learning environment at Danaa School.