Swinburne University of Technology

School of Science, Computing and Engineering

Department of Computing technologies
COS70008 Technology Innovation Project
Semester 1 2022

Peer Review Form

Due: By the end of week 11 lab session

Note: This form will be kept private without being disclosed to team members.

Project Title: Solid Waste Treatment Design

Group No: 4
Team Member List: Bui Gia Bao, Le Hoang Minh, Phan Nguyen Son, Doan Phuong Anh Tuan

Use the instructions in the end to fill in the scores (0-5) for each category A to J:
Team Member A B C D E F G H I J Tota
l
Bui Gia Bao 4 4 3 5 4 3 4 4 4 5 40
Le Hoang Minh 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 5 39
Phan Nguyen Son 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 35
Doan Phuong Anh Tuan 3 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 35

Detailed Comments:
Team member Comments
Le Hoang Minh Le Hoang Minh has been a real hero on this project. Her
analytics skills are top-notch, especially when it came to
the design logic. He really grasped the complex aspects of
the project and always came up with solutions. Minh is
also a great communicator - he explains things clearly,
which really helps everyone understand what's going on.
He's always willing to help others, too, making him a
fantastic mentor to the team. I can always count on him to
get things done on time and take responsibility, which
makes him a super reliable teammate.
Phan Nguyen Son Son has done a great job with the team’s presentation. He
really has an eye for design and made the design clean
and easy to understand. He's also a good contributor to
idea reviews, spotting potential problems and giving
helpful feedback. Michael could boost his contribution
even more by taking on more responsibility and exploring
challenging areas of the project. I think diving deeper into
the technical stuff would help him grow his skills and
make an even bigger impact.
Doan Phuong Anh Tuan Tuan has been a solid team member, always willing to put
in the effort. He's got a good grasp of the core concepts

1
 and is reliable. To get even more out of David, I'd love to
see him participate more in our meetings and team
discussions. Clear communication is key to our success,
and having him chime in more often would be super
helpful. It would also be great if he felt comfortable
taking on more responsibility and tackling problems head-
on.

Instructions

The main purpose of this peer review document is for all team members, including yourself, to reflect
on interactions, but it may also be helpful in resolving potential disputes over the relative contributions
of team members.

In the first table, you should:

 List the members of your project team, and
 Enter a score between 0 and 5, for categories A to J for all team members, including yourself.

In the second table, you may provide detailed comments to explain your scores and/or describe any
other concerns.

Winger-aunty, S. 1990. University of Wisconsin-Stout Modified by Pheroza Daruwalla and Ian Knowd, 1994.

A. Quantity of Work
0 – Did nothing – uninvolved.
1 – Does enough to get by.
2 – Occasionally exceeds standards – needs improvement.
3 – Satisfactory. Does more than what is required.
4 – Very industrious. High Quality. Consistent.
5 – Always exceeds productivity standards. Outstanding.

B. Quality of Work
0 – Careless. Makes frequent mistakes. Assignment suffers.
1 – Mistakes frequent enough to question results.
2 – Work is basically correct.
3 – Accurate when and where it really counts. Satisfactory.
4 – Almost always accurate in all areas of contribution.
5 – Outstanding. Perfect quality. No mistakes.

C. Communication Skills
0 – Blunt, discourteous, does not listen, antagonistic, distant, aloof.
1 – Sometime tactless. Approachable and friendly once known by others.
2 – Agreeable and pleasant. Warm, friendly, sociable and listens.

2
3 – Always very polite and willing to help. Very sociable and outgoing. Listens and understands.
4 – Courteous and very pleasant. Excellent at establishing good will.
5 – Inspiring to others. Artful listener. Really understands.

D. Initiative
0 – Displays no self starting characteristics. Acts without purpose.
1 – Puts forth little effort. Requires prodding – sets no speed records.
2 – Puts in minimal effort to get task completed.
3 – Strives hard. Desire to achieve.
4 – High desire to achieve. Always puts in a solid days work.
5 – Sets high goals. Self starter with high motivation. Constantly goes beyond call of duty.

E. Efficiency
0 – Work is invariably late.
1 – Work occasionally completed on schedule.
2 – Work usually complete on schedule. Some contribution to minor problem solving.
3 – Work always complete on schedule.
4 – Work complete. Consistent in defining and resolving major problems.
5 – Work invariably done ahead of schedule. Imaginative. Can be counted on to make major contributions.

F. Personal Relations
0 – A very disruptive influence.
1 – Is a source of some friction.
2 – Causes no problems.
3 – Satisfactory, harmonious.
4 – Is a positive factor.
5 – Respected by others. Presence adds to environmental stability.

G. Group Meeting Attendance

0 – Never attended any meetings. Showed no interest.
1 – Occasionally attended. Would commit and then not show.
2 – Sometimes uncooperative in planning schedule. Hard to get in touch with.
3 – Would attend. Usually late.
4 – Could be counted on to attend.
5 – Never missed a meeting. Always on time.

H. Attitude and Enthusiasm

0 – Poor disposition, uninvolved, indifferent.
1 – Unenthusiastic, biased.
2 – Half-hearted.
3 – Positive demeanour.
4 – Positive attitude and spirited.
5 – Exuberant and eager. Positive influence. Inspiring to others. Team builder.

I. Effort
0 – Puts forth no effort. Expects others to carry the load.
1 – Puts forth some effort.
3
2 – Displays enough effort to get by.
3 – Solid contributions.
4 – Strives very hard. Energetic.
5 – Self-starter. Consistently goes beyond call of duty.

J. Dependability
0 – Uninvolved. Unreliable.
1 – Unsteady, but tries somewhat.
2 – Occasionally would come through. Inconsistent.
3 – Needs some improvement. Suitable.
4 – Very trustworthy. Could be counted on to take responsibility.
5 – Always responsible. Kept the group together and in the right direction. Steady influence.