Fitch
Fitch
Fitch Cheneys
Colm Mulcahy Spelman College [email protected]
n recent years a classic mid-20th century two-person card trick has resurfaced in the mathematical community. It goes something like this: A volunteer chooses five cards at random from a standard deck, hands them to you, and you show four of them to your confederate who promptly names the fifth card. This superb effect is usually credited to mathematician William Fitch Cheney, Jr. The original trick, and some generalizations discussed here, work as well with large audiences as with small ones. The tricks are 100% mathematicalthough you may choose to dress them up a little, for instance as mind-reading tricks. They will stump all but the most sophisticated onlookers; a general audience will be convinced that some sort of body language or verbal signaling is being used. To eliminate that possibility, one can utilize email, telephone, an innocent go-between, or some other form of impersonal communication. Indeed, Cheneys trick, as published by W. Wallace Lee in 1950, was intended to be carried out over the telephone.
MATH HORIZONS
Counting clockwise, any two clubs are no more than six places apart. lower Club and the other three cards to communicate the identity of this hidden card to your confederate. For example, if you have the 2 and 8, then hand back the 8, but if you have the 2 and J, hand back the 2. In general, you save one card of a particular suit and need to communicate another of the same suit, whose numerical value is k higher than the one you make available, for some integer k between 1 and 6 inclusive. Put this total linear ordering on the whole deck: A, 2, . . ., K, A, 2, . . ., K, A, . . ., K, A, . . ., K. Mentally label the three cards L (low), M (medium), and H (high) with respect to this ordering. Order the six permutations of L, M, H by rank, i.e., 1 = LMH, 2 = LHM, 3 = MLH, 4 = MHL, 5 = HLM and 6 = HML. Finally, order the three cards in the pile from left to right according to this scheme to communicate the integer desired. (See Trick 1.)
The one weakness in the method as described above is the invariant use of the first position in the pile as the suit giver, this is soon spotted by alert audiences if the trick is repeated. Here is a better idea: since both you and your confederate get to see the four cards in the pile, sum their values and reduce mod 4 (using 4 if you get 0), and use that number for the position in the pile of the suit-determining card. For example, a Jack, 8, 2 and 7 would result in 11 + 8 + 2 + 7 = 0 (mod 4), so the fourth position in the pile would be used for the suit-determining card, and the first three cards would tell your confederate what to add to the numerical value of the last card to get the hidden card. To return to the earlier example, suppose the five cards you are handed are 2, 2 8, 7, and J. You play the J, in the 4th position, communicate k = 4 (hence the 2) to your confederate using the other three cards as follows: In standard LMH order they are 7, 2, 8, so in MHL order they are 2, 8, 7. (See Tricks 2 and 3.) Of the three key ingredients in this trick, the pigeonhole principle and the permutations idea are easier to stumble upon than the fact one has only to communicate one of six (as opposed to twelve) integers. Source: The trick is at least fifty years old, and seems to have first appeared under the name Telephone Stud in Math Miracles by W. Wallace Lee, where it is attributed to William Fitch Cheney, Jr, Chairman, Department of Mathematics, University of Hartford, Hartford, CT. Thanks to Art Benjamin for providing this source, and to Paul Zorn for alerting us to the existence of the trick in the first place. Gardner mentions it in passing in his Mathematics, Magic and Mystery as well as in his The Unexpected Hanging and Other Mathematical Diversions. This article was inspired by Brain Epsteins article All You Need is Cards, published by A.K. Peters in the January 2002 A Puzzlers TributeA Feast for the Mind, a tribute to Martin Gardner. The basic Cheney trick is spelled out eloquently and concisely in J.H. van Lint and R. M. Wilsons A Course in Combinatorics, 2nd Edition. A much watered-down version, in which all five cards are assumed to be of the same suit, and non-mathematical signaling also takes place, appears in Karl Fulvess More Self-Working Card Tricks, with a nod to Cheney.
Trick 1. The jack communicates the suit, the other three cards communicate the number four. Hence the hidden card is the two of clubs.
Trick 2. Again the jack communicates the suit and the other cards communicate the number four; the hidden card is the two of clubs.
WWW.MAA.ORG 11
MATH HORIZONS
Trick 3. What is the hidden card? (Answers are on page 13.) More recently, it has been noted that this trick generalizes to larger decks, of up to 124 cards. See, for example, the January 2001 issue of Emissary or Michael Klebers article in The Mathematical Intelligencer, Winter 2002. See also Using a Card Trick to Teach Discrete Mathematics, Shai Simonson and Tara Holm, to appear in PRIMUS, 2003. We now present some variations on Cheneys trick.
which determines the suit of the hidden cardand the other three for the remaining three cards. The difference here is that you communicate k using some kind of binary coderather than permutationsfor the three free slots. Unlike in the last trick, the identities of the face up cards (in the three relevant slots) play no role here! Rather than use actual binary representations, lets agree on this convention: UDD, DUD, DDU (only 1st, 2nd or 3rd position is Up), and DUU, UDU, UUD (only 1st, 2nd or 3rd position is Down), respectively, reveal to your confederate which of 1, 2, 3 and 4, 5, 6 the integer k is. (Try Trick 4.) Since UUU is avoided above, an audience for whom you seem to be repeating the original Cheney effect can be given a choice of which trick they wish to see, even in mid-play while your confederate is out of the roomwithout ever realizing that they are deciding between two different tricks! One could, for instance, say, Should we make it harder on her this time, and only show her some of the cards? Regardless of the answer, as soon as your confederate sees the cards, she immediately knows exactly which trick she is doing. If some cards are face down she can play up the impossibility of the task before her, and the unfairness of it all, before dumbfounding the crowd by correctly announcing the identity of the hidden card. One more piece of drama can be added to this trick. Since the DDD possibility for card placement is also avoided above, at least one card of these three is always face up. Hence, we can use a face-up card (lets agree on the first such if there are two) to communicate the suit. When all is said and done, this means that only three cards of the four retained need to be shown at all (face up or face down), the fourth can be set aside and ignored, every time! This too can be used to spice up the trick upon repeat performances. Source: Original. A similar trick can be done with fewer cards.
MATH HORIZONS
Trick 5. What is the hidden card? A, 2, . . ., K, 6, 7, 8, 9; and Suit C is A, 2, . . ., K, 10, J, Q, K. If one of the four cards is the special card, A, play the other three face down and its all over: your confederate can identify the last card with what appears to be zero information! Otherwise, the pigeonhole principle guarantees that (at least) two of the four cards are from one of the three redefined suits, without loss of generality Suit A. You hand one back, and then by placing the remaining three cards on the table in some particular fashion you reveal to your confederate the identity of the card handed back. As before, save the lower card from Suit A, and communicate the higher one, whose numerical value is k past the one you hold on to, where this time k is an integer between 1 and 8 inclusive. In the convention we explain below, at least one card will be face up, so once more we can use a face up card (the first such if there are two) to communicate the suit. As suggested before, the placements UDD, DUD, DDU (one U in 1st, 2nd or 3rd position) and DUU, UDU, UUD (one D in 1st, 2nd or 3rd position), respectively, can be used to tell your confederate that k is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6. This time we also need a way to communicate 7 or 8, and we have the UUU option at our disposal. If we agree to use one particular U (say, the middle one) to give the suit, there are two ways to play the other two: Low-High (to convey k = 7) or High-Low (for k = 8) with respect to some total ordering of the deck, such as lining up Suits A, B, C in that order. (Try Tricks 5 and 6.) Source: Original. What do you do in the original five-card trick if the volunteer insists on chosing the card to be identified? Characteristically, Martin Gardner determined an out many years ago; however, be warned, it does require a certain amount of mental gymnastics.
Trick 6. What is the hidden card? Your confederate arrives on the scene, inspects the cards on the table, as well as the remainder of the deck, and asks what the chosen card was. Upon it being named, the top card of the deck is turned over, and sure enough it is the chosen card. Method & Mathematics: The mathematics is simple here, its the method that requires some memory work. Unlike in the classic Cheney trick, you do not get to choose which card is the one your confederate must identify. So, in essence, you have to use the four cards you have to try to communicate which of the remaining 52 4 = 48 possible cards it is. Since 4! = 24, you can narrow it down to one of two cards by communicating a permutation. Here is one way: fix a total ordering on the deck as before. The four seen cards now determine two things: which 48 cards remain as possibilities for the hidden fifth card, and a particular permutation of the 24 available. Assuming that we rank those permutations as before, this means that a number, say 15, is communicated. Your confederate must now mentally determine the 15th and 39th cards in the remaining ordered list of 48 possible cards: they are the cards that would usually be in those positions with respect to the agreed-upon total ordering, bumped up one for every seen card which occurs before those positions. The confederate locates these in the remainder of the deck, brings them together discreetly, and cuts the deck so as to bring one to the top and the other to the bottom. Finally, upon the naming of the chosen card, your confederate either turns over the top card, or turns over the deck to reveal the bottom card. This unpredictable last step makes the trick unsuitable for repeating, but as a one-off follow-up to the basic Cheney it is suitably mysterious. Another way to get from 1 of 24 permutations to 1 of 48 cards is to provide one additional bit of information, for instance the displayed cards could be laid out right to left or left to right (if your confederate is allowed to see this part of the proceedings) or you could provide just one subtle physical or verbal signal. Source: This is slightly adapted from Victor Eigens trick as found in Gardners The Unexpected Hanging and Other Mathematical Diversions.
Eigens Value
Effect: A volunteer from the crowd chooses any five cards from a deck, and hands them to you so that nobody else can see them. The volunteer then takes one card of their choosing back, which they show around to everybody, before plunging it into the deck and shuffling thoroughly. You quickly place the remaining four cards in a row from left to right on the table.
Answers
Trick 3. 7. Trick 4. Q. Trick 5. 9. Trick 6. Q.
WWW.MAA.ORG 13