Project 2 (Additional)
Project 2 (Additional)
2. Research Goals
Primary Goal:
• Enable generative AI models to operate efficiently on edge devices.
Sub-Goals:
1. Develop lightweight generative architectures:
Build models optimized for low-power and low-memory environments.
2. Investigate model compression techniques:
Explore advanced methods such as quantization and pruning to reduce model size
while retaining performance.
3. Implement split inference strategies:
Propose mechanisms to divide the computation between edge devices and the
cloud to balance efficiency and performance.
3. Proposed Process
Step 1: Understanding Requirements and Constraints
• Edge Device Limitations:
Limited memory (e.g., 1GB or less).
Restricted processing power (e.g., low-power ARM processors).
Energy efficiency (e.g., battery-powered devices).
• Generative Model Characteristics:
Size of pre-trained models (e.g., GPT-3 has billions of parameters).
Computational complexity (e.g., attention mechanisms in transformers).
Step 2: Selection of Generative Models
• Choose state-of-the-art generative AI models to adapt for edge devices. Examples:
Transformers: Models like GPT, BERT, or Vision Transformers.
VAEs: Useful for image or audio synthesis.
GANs (Generative Adversarial Networks): For tasks like image generation.
Step 3: Designing Lightweight Generative Architectures
• Explore compact architectures tailored for edge environments:
Tiny Transformers: Reduce the number of attention heads and hidden layers.
MobileNet-inspired Models: Use depth-wise separable convolutions for lighter
computation in vision-based generative tasks.
Sparse Transformers: Use sparse attention mechanisms to reduce computational
overhead.
Step 4: Applying Model Compression Techniques
1. Quantization:
Reduce precision of weights and activations (e.g., from 32-bit floats to 8-bit
integers).
Use quantization-aware training (QAT) to minimize performance degradation.
2. Pruning:
Remove less significant weights or entire neurons from the model.
Focus on structured pruning to retain compatibility with hardware accelerators.
3. Knowledge Distillation:
Train a smaller model (student) using the outputs of a larger pre-trained model
(teacher).
Useful for transferring knowledge without retraining from scratch.
Step 5: Developing Split Inference Strategies
• Split inference divides computation between edge devices and the cloud:
Feature Extraction on Edge: Perform initial lightweight computations locally and
send intermediate representations to the cloud.
Latency Optimization: Minimize communication delays by selecting optimal
split points.
• Example Workflow:
▪ Edge device runs the first few layers of a generative model.
▪ Intermediate outputs are sent to the cloud for more resource-intensive
processing.
▪ Final results are returned to the edge device for display or further use.
Step 6: Implementation and Testing
• Implement the proposed solutions in real-world edge devices using popular
frameworks:
Frameworks for Lightweight AI: TensorFlow Lite, PyTorch Mobile, ONNX
Runtime.
Hardware: Raspberry Pi, Nvidia Jetson Nano, or microcontrollers with AI
accelerators.
• Evaluate the performance:
Metrics: Latency, memory usage, energy consumption, and accuracy.
Comparison: Evaluate trade-offs between model compression and generative
quality.
4. Technologies Used
AI and Machine Learning Frameworks:
1. TensorFlow Lite: For deploying optimized models on edge devices.
2. PyTorch Mobile: Provides support for deploying PyTorch models on mobile and edge
platforms.
3. ONNX Runtime: Useful for running pre-trained models with cross-platform support.
Model Compression Techniques:
• TensorRT: Nvidia’s platform for accelerating deep learning inference with quantization
and pruning.
• Distiller: A library for compression techniques like pruning and quantization.
• OpenVINO: Intel’s toolkit for optimizing AI models on edge devices.
Hardware Platforms:
• Edge Devices:
Raspberry Pi (ARM Cortex processors).
Nvidia Jetson Nano (AI-specific accelerators).
Smartphones (Qualcomm Snapdragon Neural Processing Units).
Generative Model Libraries:
• Hugging Face Transformers: Pre-trained models for text-based generation tasks.
• FastGAN or StyleGAN: Generative models for image synthesis.
• OpenAI Codex or GPT models: For text-based applications like content creation or
summarization.
Cloud Platforms for Split Inference:
• AWS IoT Greengrass: Allows edge devices to interact with cloud services.
• Google Cloud IoT Core: Supports real-time communication between devices and cloud.
• Microsoft Azure IoT Edge: Helps split workloads between cloud and edge
environments.
5. Expected Outcomes
• A lightweight, energy-efficient generative AI model suitable for edge devices.
• Demonstrated improvement in latency, memory usage, and energy consumption
compared to existing solutions.
• A framework for split inference that can adapt to various edge-cloud use cases.
• Practical applications in IoT, healthcare (e.g., diagnostics), and mobile devices (e.g.,
personalized AI models).
2. Generative AI for Ethical AI Systems:
1. Problem Statement
AI systems, including generative models, sometimes produce biased, unethical, or harmful
outputs. These issues arise because:
• Training data often contains biases reflecting societal inequalities.
• Generative models, such as transformers and GANs, lack mechanisms to enforce
fairness or ethical guidelines.
• AI systems operate as "black boxes," offering little transparency about their decision-
making processes.
Addressing these shortcomings is essential to build trustworthy AI systems for real-
world applications.
2. Research Goals
Primary Goal:
• Develop generative AI systems that incorporate ethical principles into their design to
ensure fairness, accountability, and transparency.
Sub-Goals:
1. Novel Loss Functions:
Design loss functions or priors that penalize unethical or biased outputs during
training.
2. Bias Assessment Mechanism:
Develop a framework enabling the generative model to self-assess and mitigate
biases during training or inference.
3. Fairness-aware Applications:
Create generative models for text or image tasks that prioritize diversity,
inclusivity, and fairness.
3. Proposed Process
Step 1: Problem Analysis
• Identify common ethical challenges in generative AI:
Gender, racial, and cultural biases in text/image outputs.
Propagation of stereotypes or harmful misinformation.
Lack of explainability in generated content.
• Analyze existing frameworks and their shortcomings in handling ethical constraints.
Step 2: Dataset Analysis and Preprocessing
• Bias Identification:
Analyze training data for inherent biases (e.g., imbalanced representation of
groups or contexts).
Use statistical methods or explainable AI (XAI) tools to detect biased patterns.
• Data Augmentation:
Introduce diverse and inclusive examples into the dataset.
Balance underrepresented categories to minimize bias.
Step 3: Model Design
1. Incorporating Ethical Priors:
Add priors (constraints) into the generative model that promote ethical outputs.
For example:
▪ Diversity priors to ensure balanced representation.
▪ Content filters to prevent offensive or harmful outputs.
2. Custom Loss Functions:
Define loss functions that penalize biased outputs, e.g.:
▪ Fairness-aware loss: Penalizes disproportionate representation of any
group.
▪ Content moderation loss: Ensures outputs comply with ethical guidelines.
3. Self-assessment Mechanism:
Add modules for real-time bias detection in model outputs using fairness
metrics.
Enable feedback loops for the model to correct biases during inference.
Step 4: Training and Optimization
• Ethical Constraints during Training:
Implement adversarial training to challenge the model with biased data and
improve robustness.
Use reinforcement learning with ethical feedback to optimize the model.
• Explainability Integration:
Incorporate explainable AI techniques to make the generative process
transparent.
Generate logs or explanations for each output, highlighting how ethical
constraints were enforced.
Step 5: Validation and Testing
• Metrics for Fairness and Bias:
Use quantitative metrics like demographic parity, equalized odds, or statistical
parity for bias evaluation.
Conduct qualitative tests with diverse user groups to assess inclusivity and
ethical compliance.
• Case Studies for Real-world Scenarios:
Test the model in fairness-sensitive tasks such as job description generation,
educational content creation, or AI-assisted art.
4. Technologies Used
AI Frameworks:
1. Transformers (Hugging Face):
Useful for fairness-aware text generation tasks.
2. GANs (Generative Adversarial Networks):
Applied for fairness-aware image generation.
3. Fairlearn or AIF360:
Libraries to measure and mitigate bias in AI systems.
Bias Mitigation Techniques:
• Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF):
Incorporate ethical feedback into the generative process.
• Adversarial Debiasing:
Use adversarial networks to reduce unwanted biases in generated outputs.
Explainability and Transparency Tools:
• SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations):
Explain individual predictions made by the model.
• LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations):
Provide interpretable explanations for text/image outputs.
Hardware and Software Platforms:
• Cloud-based Training:
Leverage AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure for large-scale training with ethical
constraints.
• Edge Deployment:
Implement lightweight versions of fairness-aware models for real-time
applications.
5. Applications
1. Fairness-aware Text Generation:
Generate inclusive content for education, entertainment, and policy documents.
Example: AI-generated job descriptions that avoid gender-specific terms.
2. Bias-free Image Generation:
Design AI systems for creating diverse and inclusive imagery.
Example: AI-generated advertisements or educational materials representing all
demographics fairly.
3. Content Moderation Tools:
Develop AI systems that identify and filter biased, harmful, or unethical content
automatically.
6. Expected Outcomes
• A generative AI system that produces ethical, fair, and transparent outputs.
• Reduced biases in AI-generated content, promoting inclusivity and trust.
• A scalable framework for integrating ethical principles into various generative AI
applications.
3. Hybrid Generative Models for Multi-Modal Scientific Research
1. Problem Statement
Scientific research often involves multi-modal data, which includes combinations of text
(e.g., research papers), images (e.g., microscopy scans), graphs (e.g., time series plots), and
numerical datasets (e.g., experimental measurements).
Challenges with Existing Models:
• Most generative models are specialized for a single modality (e.g., text or images),
making them inefficient at combining different types of data.
• Integration of multi-modal data requires handling distinct characteristics, such as
temporal dependencies in numerical data or semantic structures in text.
• Without proper multi-modal integration, scientific discoveries in areas like materials
science, climate modelling, and neuroscience are hindered.
2. Research Goals
Primary Goal:
• Develop a hybrid generative model capable of seamlessly integrating diverse data
types to advance scientific research.
Sub-Goals:
1. Multi-modal Data Fusion:
Design a model architecture that efficiently combines text, images, graphs, and
numerical data.
2. Generating New Hypotheses:
Enable the model to produce novel hypotheses or visualizations for unexplored
scientific phenomena.
3. Cross-Domain Research Applications:
Demonstrate how the model can facilitate interdisciplinary studies, e.g.,
connecting neuroscience with computational biology or climate modeling with
materials science.
3. Proposed Process
Step 1: Problem Analysis and Scope Definition
• Identify fields where multi-modal integration is critical, such as:
Materials Science: Combining textual research papers with microscopy images.
Climate Modelling: Integrating historical climate records (graphs) with satellite
imagery.
Neuroscience: Merging experimental data (numerical/graphs) with brain
imaging scans.
• Define metrics to evaluate the success of the hybrid model:
Accuracy in generating valid multi-modal outputs.
Utility in generating novel, scientifically relevant insights.
Step 2: Dataset Preparation
• Curate Multi-Modal Datasets:
Use existing repositories or create datasets combining different modalities.
Examples:
▪ Text and Images: Combine arXiv research papers with experimental
images.
▪ Graphs and Numerical Data: Use datasets with time-series and correlated
numerical outputs, e.g., climate records.
• Preprocessing for Uniform Representation:
Normalize numerical data and standardize image resolutions.
Use embeddings (e.g., Word2Vec for text, node embeddings for graphs) to
create a common representation space.
Step 3: Hybrid Model Design
1. Model Architecture:
Backbone Framework: Use a hybrid architecture combining transformers,
CNNs, and graph neural networks (GNNs):
▪ Text Encoding: Transformers (e.g., BERT) to process text.
▪ Image Processing: Convolutional Neural Networks (e.g., ResNet) for
image features.
▪ Graph Integration: GNNs for structured graph data.
▪ Numerical Data: Dense neural networks or recurrent layers for time-
series and numerical data.
Multi-modal Fusion Layer:
▪ Design a layer to combine embeddings from text, images, graphs, and
numerical data into a unified latent space.
2. Generative Capability:
Use Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) or Generative Adversarial Networks
(GANs) to generate new multi-modal outputs:
▪ Example: Generate a research hypothesis (text) alongside a predicted
experimental image.
3. Attention Mechanisms:
Apply cross-attention mechanisms to allow the model to focus on relevant parts
of each modality during generation.
Step 4: Training and Optimization
• Loss Functions:
Multi-modal reconstruction loss: Measure accuracy of regenerating each
modality.
Cross-modal consistency loss: Ensure outputs across modalities align logically
(e.g., textual hypothesis matches numerical predictions).
• Training Strategy:
Train the model on pairs of modalities first (e.g., text and images) before
integrating all data types together.
Use transfer learning for pre-trained models (e.g., BERT, ResNet) to reduce
training time.
Step 5: Validation and Testing
• Test the model’s performance using multi-modal benchmarks:
Generate hypotheses or visualizations from mixed data inputs.
Compare with ground truth or assess novelty using domain expert evaluations.
• Conduct case studies to evaluate real-world applications:
Example: Use the model to predict properties of a new material based on textual
and imaging data.
4. Technologies Used
AI Frameworks and Libraries:
• Transformers: Hugging Face library for processing textual data.
• PyTorch or TensorFlow: For implementing custom hybrid architectures.
• DGL (Deep Graph Library): To process and integrate graph-based data.
• OpenCV: For image preprocessing and augmentation.
Multi-Modal Fusion:
• CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining): A pre-trained model that aligns text
and image embeddings.
• ALIGN: A multi-modal framework for aligning text and images in a shared latent
space.
Generative Models:
• Variational Autoencoders (VAEs): For multi-modal data generation.
• GANs (Generative Adversarial Networks): For generating images or numerical
visualizations aligned with textual inputs.
Visualization and Analysis Tools:
• Matplotlib, Seaborn, Plotly: For visualizing generated numerical data or graphs.
• Tableau: For cross-modal analysis and insights.
5. Applications
1. Materials Science:
Generate hypotheses for new material properties by combining microscopy
images with textual literature.
Visualize atomic structures or predict synthesis methods for new compounds.
2. Climate Modelling:
Combine satellite imagery with historical climate data to generate future
predictions.
Generate visualizations of potential climate phenomena like hurricanes or ice
melt.
3. Neuroscience:
Create predictive models combining MRI scans with experimental datasets.
Generate hypotheses for brain region functions based on multi-modal datasets.
6. Expected Outcomes
• A robust hybrid generative model capable of handling diverse data types.
• Enhanced scientific research efficiency by automating hypothesis generation and
visualization.
• Breakthrough cross-domain applications, enabling interdisciplinary discoveries in
materials science, neuroscience, and climate modelling.
4. Generative AI for Non-Euclidean Data :
1. Problem Statement
Generative AI models like GANs or VAEs are traditionally designed for data in Euclidean
spaces, such as images (pixel grids) or text (linear sequences). However, many real-world
data types are inherently non-Euclidean, including:
1. Graph-based Data:
Examples: Social networks, molecular structures, transportation systems.
Challenges: The irregular structure, node relationships, and edge dependencies
are not well-suited for conventional models.
2. Manifold-based Data:
Examples: Geospatial data, brain imaging, curved surfaces like protein
structures.
Challenges: Data is constrained to non-linear spaces (manifolds) that standard
generative approaches cannot model effectively.
2. Research Goals
Primary Goal:
• Develop generative models that can handle non-Euclidean data such as graphs and
manifolds, enabling applications in social network analysis, urban planning, and
computational biology.
Sub-Goals:
1. Graph Data:
Design methods to generate realistic graphs with properties like scalability,
topology preservation, and community structure.
Example: Generate new molecular structures for drug discovery.
2. Manifold Data:
Create models capable of generating and interpolating data constrained to
manifolds, such as Earth’s surface or brain cortical structures.
Example: Generate geospatial data for urban planning simulations.
3. Applications:
Social Network Analysis: Predict future social interactions or detect anomalies.
Computational Biology: Model protein folding or simulate molecular behavior.
Urban Planning: Generate traffic flow patterns or infrastructure layouts.
3. Proposed Process
Step 1: Problem Analysis
1. Identify key use cases:
For graphs: Molecular design, social network analysis, knowledge graphs.
For manifolds: Climate models, 3D medical imaging, geographical studies.
2. Define desired properties of the generated data:
Graphs: Structural validity (degree distribution, connectivity), scalability.
Manifolds: Smoothness, adherence to the manifold’s curvature.
4. Technologies Used
AI Frameworks:
• PyTorch Geometric or DGL: For implementing graph-based generative models.
• Geometric Deep Learning Libraries: Libraries like PyTorch-Manifold for working
with curved spaces.
Generative Techniques:
• Graph-based Models:
GraphGAN: For generating graphs with realistic topology.
GraphVAE: Variational Autoencoders adapted for graphs.
• Manifold Generative Models:
Riemannian VAEs: To learn latent representations on curved surfaces.
ManifoldGANs: Extending GANs for manifold-constrained data generation.
Tools for Data Analysis and Visualization:
• NetworkX: For analysing graph metrics like centrality or clustering.
• 3D Visualization: Tools like Paraview or Matplotlib for visualizing manifolds and
curved surfaces.
5. Applications
1. Social Network Analysis:
Predict future links or simulate interactions in social networks.
Generate synthetic social graphs for testing privacy-preserving algorithms.
2. Urban Planning:
Simulate geospatial layouts for urban infrastructure like roads, utilities, and
traffic.
Generate maps or layouts for new cities using geospatial data.
3. Computational Biology:
Generate new molecular structures for drug discovery or protein folding studies.
Simulate neural networks for brain connectivity research.
6. Expected Outcomes
• A scalable framework for generating non-Euclidean data, including realistic graphs
and manifold-constrained datasets.
• Enhanced understanding of complex systems, such as social networks, urban
geospatial layouts, or biological pathways.
• Applications in real-world domains, enabling advances in urban planning,
neuroscience, and molecular biology.