PHIHIS
PHIHIS
PHIHIS
LAND REFORM has gained great significance all over the world as it aims to achieve social justice
and full development of human dignity. Throughout time, the issue of land reform has been
persistent, demanding measures to stop social unrest. Worst scenarios were observed during the
colonial era when the Spanish colonizers introduced new land-holding systems to caciques. The
introduction of Torrens system created serious problems that have far-reaching effects on the
early systems of landholding. The nature inhabitants lost their ancestral domains to the
colonialists.
The poor economic and social conditions of the peasants in the Philippines need
immediate agrarian reform measures by the Philippine government.
PRE-SPANISH PERIOD
Filipinos already lived in villages and barangays even before the Spaniards came to the Philippines.
The settlements were ruled by chieftains or datus who comprised the nobility. There were also
the maharlikas (freemen), the aliping mamamahay (serfs) and aliping saguiguilid (slaves). Despite
the existence of a social structure, everyone had access to the fruits of the soil. Rice was the
medium of exchange as money was yet unknown.
The uprising resonated in other towns of the neighboring provinces, notably Biñan, Imus,
Silang, Kawit, Bacoor, San Mateo, Taguig, Parañaque, and Hagonoy. The agrarian conflicts reached
the ear of King Philip VI who appointed Oidor (a judge of the Royal Audiencias and Chancillerías)
Pedro Calderon Enriquez to investigate the charges brought against the religious orders and to
ascertain the validity of their titles to the lands in question. The friars were ordered to submit
their titles to a secular judge, but refused to comply, claiming ecclesiastical exemption. In the face
of their opposition the governor general dispossessed the friars of the lands which were said to
have been illegally occupied by the friars and which they were continuing to hold without
legitimate title, restoring the lands to the Crown. The case was appealed by the friars to the Royal
Audiencia of Manila and that tribunal upheld the first decision; then the case was further
appealed to the Council of the Indies in Spain and again the decision was confirmed. But the
whole matter did not stop here; subsequently, the friars won their case and retained the disputed
lands, and their ownership of the lands remained intact even after the end of the Spanish regime.
JAPANESE OCCUPATION
During the Second World War (that started in Europe in 1939 and in the Pacific in 1941),
the Hukbo ng Bayan Laban sa Hapon (HUKBALAHAP) controlled the areas of Central Luzon. The
HUKBALAHAP was composed of peasants and workers who took up arms against the Japanese
forces. Peasants who supported them earned fixed rentals, while landowners who supported the
Japanese lost their lands to peasants. But this was short-lived because it ended with the end of
WWII.
The problems of land tenure in the Philippines remained even after the Philippine
Independence in 1946. To address the problem, the Philippines Congress revised the tenancy law.
PRESIDENT MANUEL ROXAS (1946-1948)
During Roxas' administration, the following laws were enacted: Republic Act No. 34, which
established the 70-30 sharing arrangements and regulated the share-tenancy contracts. Republic
Act No. 55, which provided for a more effective safeguard against arbitrary ejectment of tenants.
PRESIDENT ELPIDIO QUIRINO (1948-1953)
President Elpidio Quirino (1948-1953) issued Executive Order No. 355 on October 23,
1950, replaced the National Land Settlement Administration with Land Settlement Development
Corporation (LASEDECO) that took over the responsibilities of the Agricultural Machinery
Equipment Corporation and the Rice and Corn Production Administration.
PRESIDENT RAMON MAGSAYSAY (1953-1957)
President Ramon Magsaysay (1953-1957) enacted the following laws: (a) Republic Act No.
1160 of 1954, which abolished the LASEDECO and established the National Resettlement and
Rehabilitation Administration (NARRA) to resettle dissidents and landless farmers. It was
particularly aimed at rebel returnees providing home lots and farmlands in Palawan and
Mindanao. (b) Republic Act No. 1199 (Agricultural Tenancy Act of 1954), which governed the
relationship between landowners and tenant farmers by organizing share-tenancy and leasehold
system. It also created the Court of Agrarian Relations. (c) Republic Act No. 1400 (Land Reform
Act of 1955), which created the Land Tenure Administration (LTA) that was responsible for the
acquisition and distribution of large tenanted rice and corn lands over 200 hectares for individuals
and 600 hectares for corporations. (d) Republic Act No. 821 (Creation of Agricultural Credit
Cooperative Financing Administration), which provided loans to small farmers and share tenants
with interest rates of as low six to eight percent.