0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

Exceptions

Uploaded by

navid.panah1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

Exceptions

Uploaded by

navid.panah1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

Today
Exceptional Control Flow:  Exceptional Control Flow
Processes
Exceptions and Processes 

15‐213 / 18‐213: Introduction to Computer Systems


13th Lecture, Feb 26, 2013

Instructors:
Seth Copen Goldstein, Anthony Rowe, and Greg Kesden

1 2

Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

Control Flow Altering the Control Flow


 Processors do only one thing:  Up to now: two mechanisms for changing control flow:
 From startup to shutdown, a CPU simply reads and executes  Jumps and branches
(interprets) a sequence of instructions, one at a time  Call and return
 This sequence is the CPU’s control flow (or flow of control) Both react to changes in program state

Physical control flow  Insufficient for a useful system:


Difficult to react to changes in system state
<startup>  data arrives from a disk or a network adapter
inst1  instruction divides by zero
inst2  user hits Ctrl‐C at the keyboard
Time
inst3  System timer expires

instn
<shutdown>  System needs mechanisms for “exceptional control flow”
3 4
Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

Exceptional Control Flow ECF Exists at All Levels of a System


 Exists at all levels of a computer system  Exceptions
 Low level mechanisms  Hardware and operating system kernel software
 Exceptions  Process Context Switch This Lecture
change in control flow in response to a system event
  Hardware timer and kernel software
(i.e., change in system state)
 Signals
 Combination of hardware and OS software
 Kernel software and application software
 Higher level mechanisms
 Nonlocal jumps
 Process context switch Next Lecture
 Application code
 Signals What about
 Nonlocal jumps: setjmp()/longjmp() try/catch/throw?
 Implemented by either:
 OS software (context switch and signals)
 C language runtime library (nonlocal jumps)

5 6

Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

Exceptions Exception Tables


 An exception is a transfer of control to the OS in response to
Exception
some event (i.e., change in processor state) numbers

code for  Each type of event has a


User Process OS exception handler 0 unique exception number k
Exception code for
event I_current exception Table exception handler 1  k = index into exception table
I_next exception processing 0 (a.k.a. interrupt vector)
by exception handler 1 code for almost
2 exception handler 2
• return to I_current ...  Handler k is called each time
• return to I_next
• abort
n-1 ... exception k occurs

code for
exception handler n‐1
 Examples:
div by 0, arithmetic overflow, page fault, I/O request completes, Ctrl‐C

7 8
Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

Asynchronous Exceptions (Interrupts) Synchronous Exceptions


 Caused by events external to the processor  Caused by events that occur as a result of executing an
instruction:
 Indicated by setting the processor’s interrupt pin
 Traps
 Handler returns to “next” instruction
Intentional
Examples: system calls, breakpoint traps, special instructions
 Examples:  Returns control to “next” instruction
 I/O interrupts  Faults
 hitting Ctrl‐C at the keyboard  Unintentional but possibly recoverable
 arrival of a packet from a network  Examples: page faults (recoverable), protection faults
 arrival of data from a disk (unrecoverable), floating point exceptions
 Hard reset interrupt  Either re‐executes faulting (“current”) instruction or aborts
 hitting the reset button  Aborts
 Soft reset interrupt  unintentional and unrecoverable
 hitting Ctrl‐Alt‐Delete on a PC  Examples: parity error, machine check
 Aborts current program
9 10

Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

Trap Example: Opening File Fault Example: Page Fault


int a[1000];
 User calls: open(filename, options)  User writes to memory location main ()
{
 Function open executes system call instruction int
 That portion (page) of user’s memory a[500] = 13;
0804d070 <__libc_open>: is currently on disk }
. . .
804d082: cd 80 int $0x80 80483b7: c7 05 10 9d 04 08 0d movl $0xd,0x8049d10
804d084: 5b pop %ebx
. . . User Process OS
User Process OS exception: page fault
movl
exception Create page and
int
pop Different privilege returns load into memory
open file levels!
returns
 Page handler must load page into physical memory
 OS must find or create file, get it ready for reading or writing  Returns to faulting instruction Different privilege
 Returns integer file descriptor  Successful on second try levels!
11 12
Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

Fault Example: Invalid Memory Reference Exception Table IA32 (Excerpt)


int a[1000];
main ()
{ Exception Number Description Exception Class
a[5000] = 13; 0 Divide error Fault
}
13 General protection fault Fault
80483b7: c7 05 60 e3 04 08 0d movl $0xd,0x804e360 14 Page fault Fault
18 Machine check Abort
User Process OS 32‐127 OS‐defined Interrupt or trap
128 (0x80) System call Trap
exception: page fault
movl 129‐255 OS‐defined Interrupt or trap
detect invalid address
signal process
Check Table 6‐1:
 Page handler detects invalid address
http://download.intel.com/design/processor/manuals/253665.pdf
 Sends SIGSEGV signal to user process Different privilege
 User process exits with “segmentation fault” levels!
13 14

Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

Altering the Control Flow (revisited) Today


 Up to now: two mechanisms for changing control flow:  Exceptional Control Flow
 Jumps and branches
Is there an alternative?  Processes
 Call and return
- For general purpose processors?
Both react to changes in program state
- For embedded processors?
 Insufficient for a useful system:
Difficult to react to changes in system state
 data arrives from a disk or a network adapter
 instruction divides by zero
 user hits Ctrl‐C at the keyboard
 System timer expires

 System needs mechanisms for “exceptional control flow”


15 16
Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

Processes Concurrent Processes


 Definition: A process is an instance of a running program.  Two processes run concurrently (are concurrent) if their
 One of the most profound ideas in computer science flows overlap in time
 Not the same as “program” or “processor”  Otherwise, they are sequential
 Examples (running on single core):
 Process provides each program with two key abstractions:  Concurrent: A & B, A & C
 Logical control flow  Sequential: B & C
 Each program seems to have exclusive use of the CPU
 Private virtual address space Process A Process B Process C
 Each program seems to have exclusive use of main memory

Time
 How are these Illusions maintained?
 Process executions interleaved (multitasking) or run on separate cores
 Address spaces managed by virtual memory system
 we’ll talk about this in a couple of weeks
17 18

Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

User View of Concurrent Processes Context Switching


 Processes are managed by a shared chunk of OS code
 Control flows for concurrent processes are physically
called the kernel
disjoint in time
 Important: the kernel is not a separate process, but rather runs as part
of some user process
 However, we can think of concurrent processes as  Control flow passes from one process to another via a
running in parallel with each other context switch
Process A Process B
Process A Process B Process C

user code
Time
kernel code context switch
Time user code

kernel code context switch

user code

19 20
Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

fork: Creating New Processes Understanding fork


Process n Child Process m
 int fork(void)
pid_t pid = fork(); pid_t pid = fork();
 creates a new process (child process) that is identical to the calling if (pid == 0) { if (pid == 0) {
process (parent process) printf("hello from child\n"); printf("hello from child\n");
} else { } else {
 returns 0 to the child process printf("hello from parent\n"); printf("hello from parent\n");
} }
 returns child’s pid (process id) to the parent process
pid_t pid = fork(); pid_t pid = fork();
pid_t pid = fork(); if (pid == 0) { if (pid == 0) {
if (pid == 0) { pid = m printf("hello from child\n"); pid = 0 printf("hello from child\n");
} else { } else {
printf("hello from child\n");
printf("hello from parent\n"); printf("hello from parent\n");
} else { } }
printf("hello from parent\n");
} pid_t pid = fork(); pid_t pid = fork();
if (pid == 0) { if (pid == 0) {
printf("hello from child\n"); printf("hello from child\n");
 Fork is interesting (and often confusing) because } else { } else {
printf("hello from parent\n"); printf("hello from parent\n");
it is called once but returns twice } }

hello from parent Which one is first? hello from child


21 22

Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

Fork Example #1 Fork Example #2


 Parent and child both run same code  Two consecutive forks
 Distinguish parent from child by return value from fork
void fork2()
 Start with same state, but each has private copy
{
 Including shared output file descriptor printf("L0\n"); Bye
 Relative ordering of their print statements undefined fork(); L1 Bye
printf("L1\n"); Bye
fork();
void fork1() L0 L1 Bye
{
printf("Bye\n");
int x = 1; }
pid_t pid = fork();
if (pid == 0) {
printf("Child has x = %d\n", ++x);
} else {
printf("Parent has x = %d\n", --x);
}
printf("Bye from process %d with x = %d\n", getpid(), x);
}

23 24
Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

Fork Example #3 Fork Example #4


 Three consecutive forks  Nested forks in parent
void fork3() Bye void fork4()
{ {
L2 Bye
printf("L0\n"); printf("L0\n");
fork(); Bye if (fork() != 0) {
printf("L1\n"); L1 L2 Bye printf("L1\n"); Bye
fork(); Bye if (fork() != 0) {
printf("L2\n"); L2 Bye printf("L2\n"); Bye
fork(); fork(); Bye
Bye
printf("Bye\n"); } L0 L1 L2 Bye
} L0 L1 L2 Bye }
printf("Bye\n");
}

25 26

Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

Fork Example #5 exit: Ending a process


 Nested forks in children  void exit(int status)
 exits a process
void fork5()
 Normally return with status 0
{
printf("L0\n");  atexit() registers functions to be executed upon exit
if (fork() == 0) {
printf("L1\n"); Bye
if (fork() == 0) { L2 Bye
void cleanup(void) {
printf("L2\n"); printf("cleaning up\n");
L1 Bye }
fork();
} L0 Bye
} void fork6() {
printf("Bye\n“); atexit(cleanup);
} fork();
exit(0);
}

27 28
Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

Zombies Zombie void fork7()


{
if (fork() == 0) {
 Idea Example /* Child */
printf("Terminating Child, PID = %d\n",
 When process terminates, still consumes system resources getpid());
exit(0);
 Various tables maintained by OS } else {
 Called a “zombie” linux> ./forks 7 &
printf("Running Parent, PID = %d\n",
getpid());
 Living corpse, half alive and half dead [1] 6639 while (1)
Running Parent, PID = 6639 ; /* Infinite loop */
 Reaping Terminating Child, PID = 6640 }
}
 Performed by parent on terminated child (using wait or waitpid) linux> ps
PID TTY TIME CMD
 Parent is given exit status information 6585 ttyp9 00:00:00 tcsh
 ps shows child process as
 Kernel discards process 6639 ttyp9 00:00:03 forks
6640 ttyp9 00:00:00 forks <defunct> “defunct”
 What if parent doesn’t reap? 6641 ttyp9 00:00:00 ps
linux>
 If any parent terminates without reaping a child, then child will be
reaped by init process (pid == 1)
 So, only need explicit reaping in long‐running processes
 e.g., shells and servers
29 30

Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

void fork8()
Zombie void fork7()
{ Nonterminating {
if (fork() == 0) {
if (fork() == 0) { /* Child */
Example /* Child */
printf("Terminating Child, PID = %d\n", Child Example printf("Running Child, PID = %d\n",
getpid());
getpid()); while (1)
exit(0); ; /* Infinite loop */
} else { } else {
printf("Running Parent, PID = %d\n", printf("Terminating Parent, PID = %d\n",
linux> ./forks 7 & getpid()); getpid());
[1] 6639 while (1) exit(0);
Running Parent, PID = 6639 ; /* Infinite loop */ }
Terminating Child, PID = 6640 } }
} linux> ./forks 8
linux> ps
PID TTY TIME CMD Terminating Parent, PID = 6675
6585 ttyp9 00:00:00 tcsh Running Child, PID = 6676  Child process still active even
6639 ttyp9 00:00:03 forks
 ps shows child process as linux> ps though parent has terminated
6640 ttyp9 00:00:00 forks <defunct> “defunct” PID TTY TIME CMD
6641 ttyp9 00:00:00 ps 6585 ttyp9 00:00:00 tcsh
linux> kill 6639 6676 ttyp9 00:00:06 forks
[1] Terminated  Killing parent allows child to be 6677 ttyp9 00:00:00 ps
linux> ps reaped by init linux>
PID TTY TIME CMD
6585 ttyp9 00:00:00 tcsh
6642 ttyp9 00:00:00 ps

31 32
Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

void fork8()

Nonterminating {
if (fork() == 0) {
wait: Synchronizing with Children
/* Child */
Child Example printf("Running Child, PID = %d\n",
getpid());  Parent reaps child by calling the wait function
while (1)
; /* Infinite loop */
} else {
printf("Terminating Parent, PID = %d\n",  int wait(int *child_status)
getpid());
exit(0);  suspends current process until one of its children terminates
}
}
 return value is the pid of the child process that terminated
linux> ./forks 8  if child_status != NULL, then the object it points to will be set
Terminating Parent, PID = 6675 to a status indicating why the child process terminated
Running Child, PID = 6676  Child process still active even
linux> ps though parent has terminated
PID TTY TIME CMD
6585 ttyp9 00:00:00 tcsh
6676 ttyp9 00:00:06 forks  Must kill explicitly, or else will keep
6677 ttyp9 00:00:00 ps
running indefinitely
linux> kill 6676
linux> ps
PID TTY TIME CMD
6585 ttyp9 00:00:00 tcsh
6678 ttyp9 00:00:00 ps
33 34

Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

wait: Synchronizing with Children wait() Example


 If multiple children completed, will take in arbitrary order
void fork9() {  Can use macros WIFEXITED and WEXITSTATUS to get information about
int child_status;
exit status
if (fork() == 0) {
void fork10()
printf("HC: hello from child\n"); HC Bye {
}
pid_t pid[N];
else {
int i;
printf("HP: hello from parent\n"); HP CT Bye int child_status;
wait(&child_status);
for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
printf("CT: child has terminated\n");
if ((pid[i] = fork()) == 0)
}
exit(100+i); /* Child */
printf("Bye\n");
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
exit();
pid_t wpid = wait(&child_status);
}
if (WIFEXITED(child_status))
printf("Child %d terminated with exit status %d\n",
wpid, WEXITSTATUS(child_status));
else
printf("Child %d terminate abnormally\n", wpid);
}
}
35 36
Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

waitpid(): Waiting for a Specific Process execve: Loading and Running Programs
Stack bottom
Null‐terminated
 int execve( env var strings
 waitpid(pid, &status, options) char *filename,
Null‐terminated
 suspends current process until specific process terminates char *argv[], cmd line arg strings
 various options (see textbook) char *envp[] unused
void fork11() ) envp[n] == NULL
{
pid_t pid[N];
 Loads and runs in current process: envp[n‐1]
int i;  Executable filename …
int child_status; envp[0] environ
 With argument list argv
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) argv[argc] == NULL
if ((pid[i] = fork()) == 0)  And environment variable list envp argv[argc‐1]
exit(100+i); /* Child */
for (i = N-1; i >= 0; i--) {  Does not return (unless error) …
pid_t wpid = waitpid(pid[i], &child_status, 0); argv[0]
if (WIFEXITED(child_status))  Overwrites code, data, and stack Linker vars
printf("Child %d terminated with exit status %d\n",  keeps pid, open files and signal context envp
wpid, WEXITSTATUS(child_status));
else  Environment variables: argv
argc
}
printf("Child %d terminated abnormally\n", wpid);
 “name=value” strings
Stack frame for
}  getenv and putenv main
37 Stack top 38

Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon

execve Example Summary


if ((pid = Fork()) == 0) { /* Child runs user job */  Exceptions
if (execve(argv[0], argv, environ) < 0) {
 Events that require nonstandard control flow
printf("%s: Command not found.\n", argv[0]);
 Generated externally (interrupts) or internally (traps and faults)
exit(0);
}
}  Processes
 At any given time, system has multiple active processes
argv[argc] = NULL
 Only one can execute at a time on a single core, though
argv[argc‐1] “/usr/include”
… “-lt”  Each process appears to have total control of
argv[0] “ls” processor + private memory space
argv

envp[n] = NULL
envp[n‐1] “PWD=/usr/droh”
… “PRINTER=iron”
envp[0] “USER=droh”
environ
39 40
Carnegie Mellon

Summary (cont.)
 Spawning processes
 Call fork
 One call, two returns
 Process completion
 Call exit
 One call, no return
 Reaping and waiting for processes
 Call wait or waitpid
 Loading and running programs
 Call execve (or variant)
 One call, (normally) no return

41

You might also like