CSEN 412-Chapter 2-Cross Section Elements
CSEN 412-Chapter 2-Cross Section Elements
4.0 Introduction
Cross – section elements are those features of the highway which form its effective width and
which affect vehicle movement. Of primary interest are:
• the number and width of traffic lanes.
• the central reservation
• Shoulders
• Camber of the carriageway
• Lay – bys
• Side slopes
Also related to the cross-section are cycle tracks and footpaths. Many roads in Kenya,
particularly those providing access as their major function, carry a considerable number of
pedestrians and cyclists who make use of the shoulders and carriageway edges because separate
facilities for them are not provided. From a traffic safety point of view this is an undesirable
situation and cycle tracks and/or footpaths should be included in the cross-section where
appropriate (at the cost of the width of the shoulders).
The type of cross-section to be used in the development of any road project depends on:
i. Urban or rural location
ii. Terrain
iii. The functions of the road, for example, through route or local access
iv. New road or treatment of an existing road
v. Traffic volume and mixture
vi. Number and type of trucks
vii. Provision for public transport
viii. Walking and cycling needs
ix. Creating accessible environments for all
x. Place function and associated space requirements (for roadside vending and other
roadside amenities)
xi. Environmental constraints, for example, topography, existing public utility services,
existing road reserve widths, significant vegetation, geology
3-lane roads are constructed when the design volume exceeds the capacity of a 2 – lane road but
is not sufficient to justify a 4 – lane facility. 3 lane road should only be constructed in rural areas
where it is practical to provide nearly continuous overtaking sight distances.
3-lane two-way facilities should never be constructed in urban areas because of their high
accident potential i.e. in heavy traffic drivers often want to use the middle lane as the opposing
traffic and attempt to overtake regardless of the hazardous conditions.
Four or more lanes are needed to enable vehicles to overtake on lanes not used by opposing
traffic. Normally these highways have dual carriageways separated by a central reservation.
4.1.1 Through lanes
Through lanes are the most common lane type. All roadways have at least one lane in each
direction to provide unimpeded traffic flow from Point A to Point B.
Established or common practice in Kenya can be useful in determining and documenting lane
width selection where a range of width values is provided. Table 4-2 gives ranges of widths for
the road classes gazetted in Kenya.
Notes:
i. 3.75m on urban arterials and urban collectors provide increased benefit on high speed,
free-flowing arterials. On interurban roads, 3.75 m lanes provide increased benefit
where there are higher truck volumes.
ii. On UC (urban collector) multilane facilities with width constraints, narrower inside lanes of
3.5 m may be permitted to allow for wider outside lanes for bicycles, pedestrians, and
transit. Narrower lanes also allow shorter pedestrian crossing times because of reduced
crossing distances.
iii. On urban streets, through lanes of 3.0 m may be used as a speed reduction strategy and they
also allow shorter crossing times for pedestrians. If there is considerable truck and bus
volume traffic, width of 3.5 is recommended.
4.1.2 Auxiliary lanes
An auxiliary lane is primarily for the acceleration or deceleration of vehicles entering or leaving
the through travelled way. They are normally provided for at-grade intersections on multilane
divided highways with access control. Where roadside conditions and right of way allow,
auxiliary lanes may be provided on other through roadways.
Justification for an auxiliary lane depends on many factors, including speed; traffic volumes;
capacity; type of highway; design and frequency of intersections and crash history.
A reservation width of 12 –15m is needed to bring an approaching high speed vehicle under
control to avoid the possibility of becoming involved in a head-on collision on the other
carriageway.
In rural areas consideration should always be given to varying the width in order to obtain a safe,
pleasing and economic design that fit the topography. Where possible shrubs should be grown in
as this reduce headlight glare and acts as cross barriers.
The reservation surfacing should contrast with the carriageway and distinctly visible during day
and night in wet and dry weather. For widths wider than 1.75m, grass is most suitable, but below
1.75m, use raised medians with contrasting bituminous or concrete.
The shoulder widths vary. About 3.35m is needed by a lorry to enable a tyre to be changed
without danger to operator. Passenger cars require less but form greater part of the total
stoppages hence widths of 3m are usually recommended for major highway design purposes.
This allows a 1m gap between the parked cars and the edge of the carriageway.
The best though expensive is to extend the road base beyond the edge of the carriageway. This
makes the shoulder stable, high structural strength to carriageway and shoulder can be used as a
slow traffic lane when carrying out maintenance work on carriageway.
Shoulder surfacing must be distinctly different from the carriage way otherwise motorists will
use it as a regular traffic lane. Surfacing can be of grass, bituminous with coloured stone
chippings.
Table 4.2: Recommended widths of shoulder
4.5 Camber
The term camber is used in highway engineering to describe the convexity of the carriageway
cross – section. The objective of cambering is to drain water to avoid ponding on the road
surface. Today high quality roads have average cross – slopes of between 1 in 40 and 1 in 48 …1
in 60.
Modern 2-lane roads have either parabolic or circular cross – sections. This helps avoid swaying
of commercial vehicles as they cross and re-cross the crown during an overtaking manoeuvre.
On dual carriageways, it is desirable for each carriageway to be cambered. This minimizes the
sheeting of water during rainstorms and keeps the difference between the low and high points in
the carriageway cross - section to minimum.
Where carriageways are sloped in one direction to drain from the median space to the outside,
savings are effected in drainage structures and treatment of intersecting roadways is easier.
Another possible arrangement for dual carriageways is that each carriageway should have a one
– way cross – slope draining towards the central reservation.
Advantage