Introduction To Astrochemistry
Introduction To Astrochemistry
Satoshi Yamamoto
Introduction to
Astrochemistry
Chemical Evolution from Interstellar
Clouds to Star and Planet Formation
Astronomy and Astrophysics Library
Series editors
Gerhard B€orner, Garching, Germany
Andreas Burkert, München, Germany
W.B. Burton, Mathews, Virgin Islands, USA
Athena Coustenis, Meudon CX, France
Michael A. Dopita, Weston Creek, Aust Capital Terr, Australia
Bruno Leibundgut, Garching, Germany
Georges Meynet, Versoix, Switzerland
Peter Schneider, Bonn, Germany
Virginia Trimble, Irvine, California, USA
Derek Ward-Thompson, Preston, United Kingdom
Ian Robson, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Martin A Barstow, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/848
Satoshi Yamamoto
Introduction to
Astrochemistry
Chemical Evolution from Interstellar
Clouds to Star and Planet Formation
Satoshi Yamamoto
Department of Physics
The University of Tokyo
Tokyo, Japan
v
vi Preface
introduced as examples. Furthermore, this book does not cover the entire field of
astrochemistry but puts a particular emphasis on outlining chemical evolution from
molecular clouds to star and planet formation. For other subfields of astrochemistry
(e.g., external galaxies and late-type stars), readers should refer to available review
articles, although the basic part of the astrochemical concept in this book will still
be useful for understanding their contents.
Twenty-five years ago, I moved from the spectroscopic field to the
astrochemistry field, triggered by fortuitous discoveries of some new interstellar
molecules. Since then, I have been studying the chemical evolution of molecular
clouds toward star and planet formation with my colleagues and graduate students.
Because of my limited experience and knowledge of this field, I am afraid that some
important issues might be missing or poorly presented. However, I was encouraged
by the younger generation desiring an introductory book on astrochemistry, and I
have made up my mind to publish this work. I welcome any suggestions and
criticisms from readers.
Finally, I express my sincere gratitude to all my colleagues and collaborators,
particularly to Nami Sakai, Tomoya Hirota, Takeshi Sakai, Yoshimasa Watanabe,
Shuji Saito, Masatoshi Ohishi, Norio Kaifu, and the late Hiroko Suzuki. I also thank
the members of my group for their valuable comments.
I dedicate this book to my wife, Keiko.
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Matter in Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Interstellar Matter and Its Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Interstellar Molecules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.4 Importance of Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5 Principal Aim of This Book . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.6 Units Used in Astronomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.7 Reaction Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2 Derivation of Molecular Abundances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.1 Thermal Emission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.2 Information Derived from Spectral Line Observations . . . . . . . 13
2.2.1 Radiative Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.2.2 Absorption Coefficient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.2.3 Optically Thin Case: Rotation Diagram Analysis . . . . . 20
2.2.4 Optically Thick Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.3 Mechanism Determining Excitation Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.4 Practical Issues for Deriving Molecular Abundances . . . . . . . . . 28
2.4.1 Source Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
2.4.2 Forward and Backward Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.4.3 Molecular Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3 Basic Concepts for Gas-Phase Chemical Reactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.1 Chemical Reactions: Macroscopic and Microscopic
Viewpoints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.2 Reactions in Interstellar Clouds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3.3 Ion–Molecule Reactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
3.4 Neutral–Neutral Reactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
vii
viii Contents
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283
Chapter 1
Introduction
molecules formed in interstellar clouds? How large can molecules grow in these
clouds? How are molecules incorporated into stars and planets? These questions
represent current frontiers in astronomy. Studies of structure formation processes
and chemical evolution processes of matter are apparently two halves of a whole
toward a comprehensive understanding of the history of the Universe.
In our Galaxy (the Milky Way), about 90 % of the baryon mass resides in stars, and
the remaining is in interstellar matter. Because the total mass of the Galaxy is of the
order of 1011 MJ, the total mass of interstellar matter is about 1010 MJ. Interstellar
matter consists of gas and dust particles; the latter are composed of silicate and
carbonaceous compounds, with sizes typically about 0.1 μm in diameter. Gas
dominates by mass, and the dust-to-gas mass ratio is about 0.01 in the solar
neighborhood. Because this ratio depends on metallicity—the abundance of
heavy elements—it varies among galaxies and even within our Galaxy.
Elemental abundances in interstellar matter near the solar neighborhood are
listed in Table 1.1 as number ratios relative to hydrogen nuclei. Hydrogen is the
most abundant element in the Universe, and helium is the second most abundant.
Second raw elements such as C, N, and O have abundances of 103–104 relative to
H. Heavier elements generally show lower abundances, and abundance signifi-
cantly varies within the same raw elements, reflecting the nucleosynthetic processes
occurring in stars. In particular, iron (Fe), being the element with the highest
binding energy per nucleon, is relatively abundant despite its high mass. The
elemental abundances given here do not correspond to abundances in the gas
phase. Because heavier elements tend to exist in dust grains, their gas-phase
abundances are generally lower.
Interstellar matter is not uniformly distributed over the galaxy, but is rather
concentrated in clumps and filaments of various scales, called “clouds.” Figure 1.1
shows the density and temperature for some representative classes of clouds. The
density and temperature of extended clouds such as diffuse clouds, intercloud gas,
coronal gas, and some molecular clouds lie almost on a straight line with constant
pressure, indicating that these clouds are in pressure equilibrium. In contrast, the
densest parts of molecular clouds are gravitationally contracting and hence deviate
from the line of constant pressure. Moreover, H II regions around high-mass stars,
where hydrogen mostly exists as H+, are not on the line.
The coronal and intercloud components of the interstellar medium are both
diffuse and ionized and are often referred to as hot ionized medium (HIM) and
warm ionized medium (WIM), respectively (McKee and Ostriker 1977). Such
media will form diffuse clouds after their protons recombine with electrons. In
diffuse clouds, atomic hydrogen and molecular hydrogen coexist. As the tempera-
ture decreases and the density increases, the diffuse clouds gradually become
opaque to interstellar ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and hydrogen molecules become
1.2 Interstellar Matter and Its Circulation 3
the dominant form of hydrogen. Such clouds are called molecular clouds. Molec-
ular clouds are the formation sites of new stars. Protostars are formed by the
gravitational contraction of molecular cloud cores. In general, molecular clouds
harbor rich molecules formed in the gas phase and on dust grains. Protostars further
evolve into main-sequence stars, during which time planetary systems are formed.
Main-sequence stars are stable for relatively long times during hydrogen burn-
ing. The lifetime of a 1 MJ main-sequence star is 1010 yr. After hydrogen burning
is completed, main-sequence stars evolve into late-type star stages. Some late-type
stars show considerable mass loss, which supplies gas and dust to the interstellar
medium. Massive stars (>8 MJ) finally end their lives via supernova explosions,
which are the most energetic events in the Universe. Through supernova explo-
sions, heavy elements formed during nucleosynthesis in stars revert to interstellar
medium. Thus, interstellar matter circulates throughout the galaxy over the entire
life cycle of stars.
4 1 Introduction
Fig. 1.1 Temperature-density diagram of interstellar clouds. The dashed line indicates the
constant-pressure line. The diffuse interstellar medium is in pressure equilibrium
It is more than 75 years since the existence of molecules in interstellar clouds was
first established. In 1940, McKellar identified sharp optical absorption lines
(387.46 nm and 430.03 nm) in spectra toward bright stars detected using the
Mount Wilson 100-inch telescope as the electronic transitions of CN (B-X) and
CH (A-X), respectively. Subsequently, Douglas and Herzberg (1941) found CH+ in
interstellar clouds. Although these discoveries were just the tip of the iceberg of
molecular astronomy, they did not receive much attention from astronomers; these
molecules were thought to be fragments of large molecules or grains.
In the interim, rapid advances in microwave technology in the 1940s enhanced
the sensitivity of radio astronomy. Muller and Oort (1951) and Ewen and Purcell
(1951) discovered emissions from atomic hydrogen (H I) at 1.42 GHz (21 cm) in
interstellar clouds. This finding established the existence of cold atomic clouds in
interstellar space. Because radio waves penetrate through our Galaxy, the rotation
1.3 Interstellar Molecules 5
of our Galaxy was studied in detail by observations of the H I 21-cm line (e.g., Oort
et al. 1958; Van de Hulst et al. 1954; Kalberla et al. 2005; McClure-Griffiths et al.
2009; Peek et al. 2011). In 1955, Townes presented thorough discussions of the
possibilities of detecting atoms and molecules using radio observations (Townes
1957). Townes pointed out the importance of rotational spectral lines of molecules.
However, this proposal also did not receive much attention from astronomers.
In 1963, Weinreb et al. detected the Λ-type doubling transition (1.67 GHz) of
OH in absorption spectra toward the bright radio continuum source Cassiopeia
A. OH was the first interstellar molecule detected by radio astronomical observa-
tions. The radio emissions from OH often show anomalous features, including
maser action. Strong OH masers have been the subject of astrophysical studies of
interstellar clouds, as well as late-type stars (Robinson and McGee 1967; Elitzur
1992). Above all, the importance of molecules was first recognized with the
detection of NH3. In 1968, Cheung et al. detected the inversion transition of NH3
at 23.6 GHz in emission spectra toward the center of our Galaxy. The existence of a
familiar molecule such as NH3 in interstellar clouds clearly demonstrated the
existence of a new world of molecular astronomy. Cheung et al. (1969) also
detected extremely bright rotational emission from H2O at 22.2 GHz toward the
Orion Nebula and W49, which was later found to be due to maser action. Addi-
tionally, Snyder et al. (1969) detected the first organic interstellar molecule, H2CO.
Following these discoveries, HCN and CO were successively reported in interstel-
lar clouds (Snyder and Buhl 1971; Wilson et al. 1970). The original papers
reporting the discoveries of these molecules clearly convey the vivid surprise and
excitement of their authors.
To date, we know of about 170 interstellar molecules; see Table 1.2. Molecules
containing up to 13 atoms have so far been found in interstellar media. Most of
these molecules have been detected by radio observations of their rotational
spectral lines; some have been identified by optical or infrared observations of
their electronic or vibration-rotation spectra. A few characteristic features of
interstellar molecules can be deduced from Table 1.2. First, many chemically
reactive species such as free radicals and molecular ions are listed. This fact reflects
the very low density and very low temperature conditions of interstellar clouds
compared with laboratory conditions. Given the extreme conditions, chemically
reactive species can survive for a long time. Second, the existence of ionic species
such as HCO+, H3+, and C6H means that interstellar clouds are weakly ionized
plasmas. As will be discussed in later chapters, these ions play central roles in the
formation of various molecules in interstellar clouds. Third, a number of highly
unsaturated hydrocarbon molecules such as carbon-chain molecules and their
geometrical isomers exist despite the hydrogen-dominated conditions of interstellar
clouds. The presence of unsaturated hydrocarbon molecules in interstellar clouds is
the most characteristic feature of interstellar chemistry and is one of the important
subjects of this book. Finally, saturated complex organic molecules such as
HCOOCH3 and (CH3)2O can be found in some sources, meaning that chemical
evolution in interstellar clouds produces fairly complex molecules even under
6 1 Introduction
After the discoveries of various molecules in interstellar clouds, the important and
interesting goal became the understanding of the chemical processes that produce
these species. Molecular synthesis through gas-phase ion–molecule reactions was
proposed and successfully explained the basic molecular abundances observed in
interstellar clouds (e.g., Klemperer 1970; Herbst and Klemperer 1973; Watson
1974). This mechanism of molecular formation was verified via the identification
of molecular ions such as HCO+ and HN2+ (Woods et al. 1975; Saykalley et al.
1976). Later, the importance of neutral–neutral reactions was recognized, even in
1.4 Importance of Chemistry 7
This book describes the basic aspects of astrochemistry for researchers and graduate
students who are investigating molecules in interstellar media or who are purely
interested in the subject. This book is also for researchers in fields of molecular
science and planetary science. The main aim of this book is to provide the
fundamental physical and chemical concepts that astrochemical concepts are
entirely based on. Astrochemistry is a rapidly growing field that is constantly
pushing its frontiers. Researchers in this field need to remain abreast of rapid
developments and also have to produce new ideas and concepts from new obser-
vational results. Furthermore, chemical models are becoming more and more
complex, which makes it difficult for nonexperts to understand their applicability
and limitations. To handle such situations, basic concepts of astrochemistry are
essential and hence are covered in this book. Nevertheless, current frontiers and
topics of astrochemistry that are still controversial are not expanded on, although
some recent works are introduced as examples of applications. The reader is
encouraged to seek out the excellent review articles on these topical issues. Radio
astronomy is the most important observational technique of astrochemistry; its
basic principles are briefly introduced in the Appendix. Additional details of
radio astronomy are comprehensively presented in other books, and we hope that
the reader will refer to these resources.
References
W.S. Adams, Annual Report of the Director of the Mount Wilson Observatory 1938–1939, pp. 23
M. Agundez, J. Cernicharo, J.R. Pardo, J.P. Fonfria Exposito, M. Guelin, E.D. Tenenbaum,
L.M. Ziurys, A.J. Apponi, Astrophys. Space Sci. 313, 229 (2008)
Y. Aikawa, E. Herbst, H. Roberts, P. Caselli, Astrophys. J. 620, 330 (2005)
M. Allen, G.W. Robinson, Astrophys. J. 212, 396 (1977)
M. Asplund, N. Grevesse, A.J. Sauval, P. Scott, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 47, 481 (2009)
J. Cami, J. Bernard-Salas, E. Peeters, S. Malek, Science 329, 1180 (2010)
P. Caselli, C.M. Walmsley, M. Tafalla, L. Dore, P.C. Myers, Astrophys. J. 523, L165 (1999)
A.C. Cheung, D.M. Rank, C.H. Townes, D.D. Thornton, W.J. Welch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1701
(1968)
10 1 Introduction
A.C. Cheung, D.M. Rank, C.H. Townes, D.D. Thornton, W.J. Welch, Nature 221, 626 (1969)
A.E. Douglas, G. Herzberg, Astrophys. J. 94, 381 (1941)
M. Elitzur, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 30, 75 (1992)
H.I. Ewen, E.M. Purcell, Nature 168, 356 (1951)
R.T. Garrod, V. Wakelam, E. Herbst, Astron. Astrophys. 467, 1103 (2007)
A.E. Glassgold, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 34, 241 (1996)
T.E. Graedel, W.D. Langer, M.A. Frerking, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 48, 321 (1982)
T.I. Hasegawa, E. Herbst, C.M. Leung, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 82, 167 (1992)
E. Herbst, W. Klemperer, Astrophys. J. 185, 505 (1973)
E. Herbst, C.M. Leung, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 69, 271 (1989)
E. Herbst, H.-H. Lee, D.A. Howe, T.J. Millar, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 268, 335 (1994)
G. Hinshaw, D. Larson, E. Komatsu, et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 208, 19 (2013)
T. Iguchi, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 27, 515 (1975)
P.M.W. Kalberla, W.B. Burton, D. Hartmann, E.M. Arnal, E. Bajaja, R. Morras, W.G.L. Roppel,
Astron. Astrophys. 440, 775 (2005)
W. Klemperer, Nature 227, 1230 (1970)
H.W. Kroto, J.R. Heath, S.C. O’Brien, R.F. Curl, R.E. Smalley, Nature 318, 162 (1985)
H.-H. Lee, R.P.A. Bettens, E. Herbst, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 119, 111 (1996)
N.M. McClure-Griffiths et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 181, 398 (2009)
C.F. McKee, J.P. Ostriker, Astrophys. J. 218, 148 (1977)
D. McElroy, C. Walsh, A.J. Markwick, M.A. Cordiner, K. Smith, T.J. Millar, Astron. Astrophys.
550, A36 (2013). http://udfa.ajmarkwick.net/
A. McKellar, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 52, 187 (1940)
T.J. Millar, L.A.M. Nejad, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 217, 507 (1985)
C.A. Muller, J.H. Oort, Nature 168, 357 (1951)
H.S.P. Muller, S. Therwirth, D.A. Roth, G. Winnewisser, Astron. Astrophys. 370, L49 (2001)
H.S.P. Muller, F. Schloder, J. Stutzki, G. Winnewisser, J. Mol. Struct. 742, 215 (2008)
J.H. Oort, F.J. Kerr, G. Westerhout, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 118, 379 (1958)
J.E.G. Peek et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 194, 20 (2011)
Planck Collaboration, Astron. Astrophys. 571, A16 (2014)
S.S. Prasad, W.T. Huntress Jr., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 43, 1 (1980)
B.J. Robinson, R.X. McGee, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 5, 183 (1967)
R.J. Saykalley, T.A. Dixson, T.G. Anderson, P.C. Szanto, R.C. Woods, Astrophys. J. 205, L101
(1976)
L.E. Snyder, D. Buhl, Astrophys. J. 163, L47 (1971)
L.E. Snyder, D. Buhl, B. Zuckerman, P. Palmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 679 (1969)
H. Suzuki, S. Yamamoto, M. Ohishi, N. Kaifu, S. Ishikawa, Y. Hirahara, S. Takano, Astrophys.
J. 392, 551 (1992)
A.G.G.M. Tielens, W. Hagen, Astron. Astrophys. 114, 245 (1982)
C.H. Townes, in The Fourth International Astronomical Union Symposium, Manchester 1955,
ed. by H.C. Van de Hulst, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1957), paper 16
Van de Hulst, C.A. Muller, J.H. Oort, Bull., Astron. Inst. Netherlands 452, 117 (1954)
W.D. Watson, Astrophys. J. 188, 35 (1974)
W.D. Watson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 48, 513 (1976)
W.D. Watson, E.E. Salpeter, Astrophys. J. 174, 321 (1972a)
W.D. Watson, E.E. Salpeter, Astrophys. J. 175, 659 (1972b)
S. Weinreb, A.H. Barrett, M.L. Meeks, J.C. Henry, Nature 200, 829 (1963)
R.W. Wilson, K.B. Jefferts, A.A. Penzias, Astrophys. J. 161, L43 (1970)
R.C. Woods, T.A. Dixon, R.J. Saykalley, P.C. Szanto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1269 (1975)
L.M. Ziurys, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 103, 12274 (2006)
Chapter 2
Derivation of Molecular Abundances
Here, we consider the relation between radiation emitted by matter and the tem-
perature of matter. Imagine a gas burner heating a brick. The brick appears first
tinged with red; later, as it continues to be heated, it shines as white light. This
experiment indicates that a brick emits visible light at high temperature and that its
color depends on its temperature. Then, what about a brick at room temperature?
When a room-temperature brick is set in a closed room and the light in the room is
turned off, we cannot see the brick. That is, the brick at room temperature does not
emit visible light detectable by human eyes. We usually recognize a brick at room
temperature by the light that it reflects from sunlight or lights in the room.
Nevertheless, a room-temperature brick emits electromagnetic radiation in the
infrared part of the spectrum. Even without any illumination, we can indeed detect
such bricks using an infrared camera. Matter at different temperatures emits
electromagnetic waves of different wavelengths. For lower-temperature objects,
the emitted wavelengths become longer. Interstellar matter, whose temperature is as
low as 10 K, does not emit even infrared radiation but instead emits radio waves.
Cold interstellar matter can accordingly be traced by radio observations.
Radiation from matter at a nonzero temperature is called thermal emission. In
general, its intensity depends on the composition of material as well as its temper-
ature, to be described below. However, we can suppose as an extreme case that
matter is completely opaque and absorbs all radiation at any wavelength without
reflection. Such matter is called a blackbody. Among all matter, a blackbody gives
the maximum thermal emission at a given temperature. The above condition
defining a blackbody is too idealized, however, and it is rarely fulfilled in reality.
Most blackbodies can be regarded as blackbodies in a particular range of wave-
lengths. For instance, let us consider a brick and an iron block of similar shape. At
room temperature, these two objects can be readily distinguished in terms of how
they reflect visible light. Hence, they cannot be regarded as blackbodies. At high
temperatures, both the brick and iron block similarly radiate white light; hence, we
cannot distinguish them. In this situation, radiation from the environment is
absorbed, and emissions from the two objects are seen. Hence, both the brick and
iron block can be regarded as blackbodies in this instance. It should be noted that
the emission from blackbodies does not depend on its composition, but only on its
temperature. The importance of this characteristic was first noted by Gustav
Kirchhoff (Kirchhoff 1860). Based on his findings, Max Planck later established
the theory of blackbody radiation and introduced the Planck constant (Planck
1901). This theory was one of the important milestones in the development of
quantum theory.
Energy emitted from the blackbody per area dS, time dt, frequency dν, and solid
angle dΩ is written as:
dE ¼ Bν ðTÞdSdtdνdΩ, ð2:1Þ
2hν3 1
Bν ðTÞ ¼ , ð2:2Þ
c2 expðhν=kB TÞ 1
where h denotes the Planck constant, c the speed of light, v the frequency of
radiation, and kB the Boltzmann constant. The units of Bv(T) are erg s1 cm2 Hz
1
sr1. It should be noted that, for a given frequency, Bv(T) only depends on
temperature, irrespective of composition and structure of the blackbody. Figure 2.1
shows a plot of Bv(T) as a function of frequency for various temperatures. The
frequency corresponding to the peak intensity rises at higher temperatures, the
relationship being known as Wien’s displacement law. For instance, the surface
temperature of the Sun is 6000 K, and hence the Sun can be regarded as a blackbody
with that temperature. Its radiation has an intensity peak in the visible wavelengths.
In contrast, the cosmic microwave background radiation can be well approximated
as a blackbody with a temperature of 2.73 K, whose intensity peak appears in the
microwave regime.
If hν/kBT1, then by expanding the exponential part of Eq. (2.2), the following
approximate relation known as the Rayleigh–Jeans law is derived:
2v2
Bν ðTÞ ffi kB T: ð2:3Þ
c2
In this case, the intensity is proportional to temperature. Note that this equation does
not involve the Planck constant and is regarded as the classical limit of blackbody
radiation. In contrast, for hν/kBT 1, Wien’s law holds:
2.2 Information Derived from Spectral Line Observations 13
Fig. 2.1 Spectral lines for blackbody radiation at various temperatures (Note the log–log scale of
the plot)
2hν3 hν
Bν ðTÞ ffi 2 exp : ð2:4Þ
c kB T
assumption is justified when the beam diameter is much larger than the wavelength
(λ ¼ c/v). Similar to Eq. (2.1), the intensity Iv of the wave is defined from:
dE ¼ I ν dSdtdνdΩ: ð2:5Þ
The unit of intensity is erg s1 cm2 sr1 Hz1. Although intensity is conserved in
the vacuum of space (Problem 2.1), it varies due to absorption and emission by
atoms and molecules in the intervening clouds. We define the x axis as the direction
of propagation. A change in intensity, dIv, for an infinitesimal propagation of dx is
represented as:
dI ν
¼ αν I ν þ jν : ð2:7Þ
dx
In general, αv and jv vary from position to position and hence are functions of x.
Dividing both sides of this equation by αv and defining a new variable τv:
dI ν
¼ I ν þ Sν , ð2:9Þ
dτ
where,
Sν ¼ jν =αν : ð2:10Þ
where,
τν ¼ αν L: ð2:12Þ
This relation must hold for any value of τv, because blackbody radiation is inde-
pendent of the internal structure of the emitting body. To satisfy this condition, the
source function must be the Planck function. Specifically, we obtain:
Sν ¼ Bν ðTÞ: ð2:14Þ
This result means that the absorption coefficient and the emissivity are not inde-
pendent, but their ratio (the source function) is constrained by the temperature
through the Planck function. This relation is known as Kirchhoff’s law of thermal
radiation and is based on the physical requirement that emission and absorption
have to be balanced in thermal equilibrium.
By substituting Sv with Bv(T) in Eq. (2.11), we obtain:
In actual observations, the target position and a nearby position without any cloud
emission and absorption are alternatively observed, and their difference is taken to
reduce the effects of gain variation of the telescope system and changes in atmo-
spheric conditions. Because the intensity toward the off-source position is given as
I ν ¼ Bν ðT b Þ, ð2:16Þ
frequency (Problem 2.2). Hence, the intensity can be represented by the tempera-
ture at which a blackbody emits the same intensity. In particular, the intensity is
proportional to the temperature in the Rayleigh–Jeans law (hν/kBT1). Hence, the
temperature scale of the intensity, ΔT, is defined using the Rayleigh–Jeans law,
regardless of its validity. Then, we obtain:
hν 1 1
ΔT ¼ f1 expðτν Þg: ð2:18Þ
kB expðhν=kB TÞ 1 expðhν=kB T b Þ 1
This temperature scale for intensity is very useful because we can avoid the rather
complex units of erg s1 cm2 Hz1 sr1 and can readily imagine a physical
temperature of an emitter. Furthermore, this scale is convenient for intensity
calibrations from blackbody radiation, as explained in Chap. 11.
As described above, the observed intensity depends on the temperature of the cloud,
the background temperature, and the optical depth. The optical depth is related to
the absorption coefficient, which reflects all electromagnetic properties of an
emitter. Here, we formulate the absorption coefficient in terms of the properties
of atoms or molecules. For simplicity, we first consider a two-level system, of lower
level l and upper level u specified by the energy levels of a molecule or an atom
(Fig. 2.2), and consider the absorption coefficient for the transition from level l to
level u. The absorption probability per unit time is represented by Blu J v , where Bij is
Fig. 2.2 Two-level system: Populations for the upper and lower levels are denoted by nu and nl ,
respectively; degeneracies by gu and gl , respectively. Spontaneous emission, stimulated emission,
and absorption are indicated by the corresponding Einstein coefficients; collisional excitation and
de-excitation are also indicated
2.2 Information Derived from Spectral Line Observations 17
the Einstein B coefficient for the transition from level i to level j, and Jv represents
the mean intensity for the molecule:
Z
1
Jν ¼ I ν dΩ: ð2:20Þ
4π
A similar relation holds for a stimulated emission from level u to level l. Hence, the
energy extracted from an electromagnetic-wave beam in a frequency range dν, solid
angle dΩ, time dt, and volume dV is given by:
hν
dI ν dνdΩdtdS ¼ ϕðνÞðnl Blu nu Bul ÞI ν dνdΩdtdV, ð2:21Þ
4π
where ni stands for a number of molecules populating level i. Here, ϕ(v) is a line
profile function satisfying the following normalization relation:
Z
ϕðvÞdv ¼ 1: ð2:22Þ
hν
αν ¼ ϕðνÞðnl Blu nu Bul Þ, ð2:23Þ
4π
The Einstein B coefficients, Blu and Bul , are related to each other and are
proportional to the Einstein A coefficient, Aul , as:
and
c2
Bul ¼ Aul : ð2:26Þ
2hν3ul
Here, gi represents the degeneracy of level i, and νul is the resonance frequency for
the two-level system. Using these relations, the absorption coefficient becomes:
c 2 nu hνul
αul ¼ exp 1 Aul , ð2:27Þ
8πν2ul Δν kB T
18 2 Derivation of Molecular Abundances
1
ϕðνÞ ¼ , ð2:29Þ
Δν
where the line width, Δν, is assumed to be much smaller than νul . The Einstein A
coefficient is written as:
Here, Sul is the line strength, which is the square of the matrix elements for the
direction cosines (Sect. 2.4.3), and μ is the dipole moment responsible for the
transition. In the case of a linear (or diatomic) molecule, Sul equals J þ 1 for the
transition J þ 1 $ J. These values are tabulated in spectral line databases for many
molecules.
If a Boltzmann distribution at temperature T is assumed for the level population,
the number of molecules in level u per unit volume can be written in terms of the
total number of molecules, n:
gu Eu
nu ¼ n exp , ð2:31Þ
U ðT Þ kB T
where U(T) is the partition function at temperature T, and Eu the upper-state energy.
By combining Eqs. (2.27), (2.30), and (2.31), we obtain:
2.2 Information Derived from Spectral Line Observations 19
8π 3 νul Sul μ2 hνul Eu
αul ¼ n exp 1 exp : ð2:32Þ
3hcΔνUðT Þ kB T kB T
The line width is usually represented in terms of a velocity width, rather than a
frequency width, because the line width largely depends on the Doppler effect. The
velocity width is defined as:
Δν
Δv ¼ c: ð2:33Þ
νul
Considering this relation, we finally obtain an expression for the optical depth as:
8π 3 Sul μ2 hνul Eu
τul ¼ exp 1 exp N, ð2:34Þ
3hΔvU ðT Þ kB T kB T
where N is the column density, N ¼ nL. Apparently, the optical depth is proportional
to the column density, the line strength, and the square of the dipole moment.
Unless the depth of the cloud (L ) along the line of sight is known, only the column
density can be derived from observations.
In derivation of Eq. (2.34), the level population is assumed to be represented by
the Boltzmann distribution at a temperature T to relate the population of the upper
level to the total number of molecules. If this assumption is satisfied, the system is
said to be in local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE). For a rotational energy-level
system, this temperature is called the rotation temperature.
The excitation temperature, Tex, for the transition u ! l can be determined by the
populations of level l and level u using the following relation:
nu gl hν
¼ exp , ð2:35Þ
nl gu kB T ex
In LTE conditions, the excitation temperature is the same as the rotation temper-
ature. In interstellar clouds, molecules are excited and de-excited in collisions with
H2 molecules, although collisions with H atoms and electrons are also important in
some cases. That is, the H2 molecules form a heat bath. If the collisions are
sufficiently frequent when compared with radiation probabilities, the rotation
temperature is close to the kinetic temperature of H2, and the LTE condition is
satisfied. If the collisions are less frequent, cooling by radiation processes becomes
more important. The level population then diverges from LTE and cannot be
represented by a single Boltzmann distribution. In this case, the excitation temper-
ature differs from transition to transition and is usually lower than the gas kinetic
temperature. We describe this situation in Sect. 2.3.