Contents

1 Introduction 3

2 Background of Sharing Economy 4

2.1 Definition and Concept . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Historical Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.3 Technological Enablers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.4 Economic Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

3 Market Participants in the Sharing Economy 7

3.1 Providers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1.1 Individual Providers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1.2 Corporate Providers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.3 Motivations and Incentives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.2 Users . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.2.1 Demographics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.2.2 Usage Patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.2.3 Motivations and Incentives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.3 Platforms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.3.1 Role and Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.3.2 Revenue Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.3.3 Regulatory Challenges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

4 Benefits of the Sharing Economy 14

4.1 Economic Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.1.1 Cost Savings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.1.2 Income Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4.1.3 Market Efficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4.2 Social Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
4.2.1 Community Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
4.2.2 Access Over Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.2.3 Inclusivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.3 Environmental Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
4.3.1 Resource Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
4.3.2 Reduction in Waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.3.3 Sustainability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

5 Drawbacks of the Sharing Economy 20

5.1 Economic Drawbacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.1.1 Income Inequality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.1.2 Market Disruption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
5.1.3 Job Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5.2 Social Drawbacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
5.2.1 Trust and Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
5.2.2 Privacy Concerns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
5.2.3 Exploitation Risks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
5.3 Environmental Drawbacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
5.3.1 Overconsumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
5.3.2 Environmental Degradation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
5.3.3 Sustainability Challenges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

6 Business Models in the Sharing Economy 27

6.1 Peer-to-Peer (P2P) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
6.2 Business-to-Consumer (B2C) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
6.3 Hybrid Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
6.4 Revenue Streams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

1
7 Regulatory and Policy Considerations 30
7.1 Current Regulatory Landscape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
7.2 Challenges in Regulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
7.3 Policy Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

8 Technological Innovations 33
8.1 Role of Digital Platforms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
8.2 Blockchain and Smart Contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
8.3 Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

9 Future Trends and Directions 35

9.1 Emerging Markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
9.2 Technological Advancements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
9.3 Evolving Consumer Preferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

10 Conclusion 37

2
 Exploring the Motivations and Impacts of the Sharing
Economy: Economic Inequalities, Social Challenges, and
Environmental Dimensions with Emphasis on Sustainability
and Ethical Considerations
John Doe
[email protected]
September 25, 2024

Abstract
The sharing economy has significantly transformed various sectors, influencing market dynamics
and societal interactions through peer-to-peer exchanges and platform-based services. This study
explores the multifaceted impacts of the sharing economy, highlighting its economic advantages,
such as lower fees, faster transactions, and income distribution opportunities. It also examines the
regulatory challenges and social implications, including the potential for community building and
the sustainability of digitally-mediated relationships. The disruption of traditional business models
and the role of reputation systems in fostering trust and innovation are discussed. Technological
enablers like digital platforms, blockchain, mobile technology, IoT, and AI are identified as crucial
for the growth and efficiency of the sharing economy, despite challenges related to data privacy,
security, and inclusivity. The historical development of the sharing economy is traced from pre-
industrial sharing practices to its modern digital incarnation, emphasizing the influence of socio-
economic transformations and technological advancements. The economic context is analyzed,
considering the benefits of resource optimization and market efficiency, alongside the variability in
economic motivations across sectors and the impact of regulatory frameworks. This comprehensive
analysis underscores the need for further research and policy development to address the challenges
and harness the full potential of the sharing economy.

1 Introduction
The introduction of the sharing economy has brought about significant transformations in various sec-
tors, influencing both market dynamics and societal interactions. The sharing economy, characterized
by peer-to-peer exchanges and platform-based services, has been the subject of extensive research,
focusing on its benefits, drawbacks, and market implications.
One of the primary benefits of the sharing economy is its potential to foster economic advantages.
For instance, it can lead to lower fees and faster transaction settlements, which are appealing to
consumers seeking cost-effective and efficient services. Additionally, the sharing economy can facili-
tate income distribution by providing opportunities for individuals to monetize underutilized assets
[MTK24]. This economic model not only enhances consumer choice but also promotes resource effi-
ciency and sustainability.
However, the sharing economy is not without its drawbacks. Regulatory challenges are a signifi-
cant concern, as existing frameworks often struggle to keep pace with the rapid evolution of sharing
platforms. Prior research has predominantly focused on specific sectors, regulatory approaches, or
stakeholders, highlighting the fragmented nature of regulatory responses. This lack of cohesive regu-
lation can lead to issues such as unfair competition and consumer protection risks.
Moreover, the sharing economy’s impact on social dynamics is noteworthy. Digital platforms have
the potential to reinforce social ties and establish communities, which is increasingly important in
an era where natural community formation is less common. For example, digital platforms can fa-
cilitate interactions and collaborations among individuals, thereby fostering a sense of community

3
and mutual support [Aki+21]. However, this also raises questions about the sustainability of such
digitally-mediated relationships and their long-term implications for social cohesion.
The sharing economy also presents unique market dynamics. It enables peer-to-peer exchanges
of goods and services, which can disrupt traditional business models and incumbents [BM17]. This
disruption can lead to increased competition and innovation, driving market efficiency and consumer
benefits. However, it can also result in market fragmentation and the marginalization of traditional
service providers who may struggle to compete with more agile, platform-based competitors [MBJ23].
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s reliance on reputation systems and collaborative networks
plays a crucial role in its functioning. Reputation systems help build trust among users, which is
essential for the success of peer-to-peer transactions. These systems, along with patterns of network
formation, facilitate collaborative innovation and the creation of social capital, which are vital for the
growth and sustainability of sharing platforms [Tôt+22].
Despite the numerous benefits, the sharing economy also faces significant challenges that need to be
addressed through further research and policy development. For instance, there is a need to explore the
desirable evolutionary direction of the sharing platform economy to resolve existing controversies and
conflicts [KL19]. Additionally, understanding the impacts of the sharing economy on energy efficiency
and sustainable economic development is crucial for aligning it with broader societal goals [Jin+23].
In summary, the sharing economy offers a range of benefits, including economic advantages, en-
hanced social interactions, and market efficiency. However, it also presents challenges related to regula-
tion, market disruption, and social sustainability. Addressing these challenges requires a comprehensive
understanding of the sharing economy’s dynamics and the development of appropriate regulatory and
policy frameworks.

2 Background of Sharing Economy

2.1 Definition and Concept
Definition and Concept
The sharing economy, often referred to as the collaborative economy, encompasses a wide range
of activities that involve the sharing of resources, services, or goods among individuals, typically
facilitated by digital platforms. This concept is rooted in the idea of maximizing the utilization of
underused assets, thereby promoting efficiency and sustainability. According to, the sharing economy
can be driven by various motivations, including economic, social, and environmental factors. These
motivations are not always uniformly emphasized across different sectors of the sharing economy,
indicating a complex interplay of incentives.
The sharing economy is characterized by its ability to reduce energy consumption and provide
multiple benefits across social, economic, and environmental dimensions [Sad+23]. This multifaceted
impact aligns with the broader goals of sustainable development, as it encourages the efficient use of
resources and fosters community engagement. However, the rapid scaling of certain sharing economy
sectors has sparked debates about its true sustainability and the potential negative consequences of
its growth [BM17].
A critical aspect of the sharing economy is its reliance on digital platforms to facilitate trans-
actions and interactions between users. These platforms often employ innovative technologies, such
as blockchain, to enhance transparency, security, and trust among participants. The integration of
blockchain technology, particularly in the hospitality and tourism sectors, highlights the importance
of balancing technical and behavioral considerations to ensure user acceptance and system success
[MTK24].
Despite its potential benefits, the sharing economy is not without its drawbacks. Public perceptions
of the sharing economy often include concerns about its darker sides, such as issues related to trust,
risk perception, and the potential for exploitation [Har+24]. These concerns underscore the need for
a coherent definition and clear demarcation of practices included in the sharing economy to address
discrepancies and ensure a fair and sustainable system.
The sharing economy’s conceptual framework also involves understanding the different types of
marketplace business models that exist within this space. These models can vary significantly in terms
of market structure, orientation, and industry sector, necessitating a systematic approach to categorize

4
and evaluate them [CM20]. This typology helps in identifying the key attributes of sharing economy
business models and their implications for market dynamics and user behavior.
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s expansion has led to discussions about its impact on sustain-
ability. As the sharing economy grows, it is essential to consider the coordination and provision of
resources to maintain its sustainability benefits [Obe24]. The tension between growth and sustainabil-
ity highlights the need for ongoing research and theorizing to address the challenges and opportunities
presented by the sharing economy.
In summary, the sharing economy represents a complex and evolving concept that integrates eco-
nomic, social, and environmental motivations. It leverages digital platforms and innovative technologies
to facilitate resource sharing, while also facing challenges related to public perception, sustainability,
and market dynamics. Understanding these multifaceted aspects is crucial for developing a compre-
hensive and sustainable sharing economy framework.

2.2 Historical Development

The historical development of the sharing economy is deeply intertwined with significant socio-economic
transformations, particularly those brought about by the Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Rev-
olution, which began in the late 18th century, marked a pivotal shift from agrarian economies to
industrialized and urbanized societies. This period saw the rise of mass production, technological
advancements, and the creation of new economic structures, which laid the groundwork for modern
economic systems, including the sharing economy.
The sharing economy, as a concept, has evolved significantly over time. Initially, economic activities
were primarily localized and community-based, with sharing and bartering being common practices.
However, the Industrial Revolution introduced a new paradigm of economic activity characterized by
large-scale production and consumption. This shift led to the centralization of economic power and the
creation of formal markets, which gradually diminished the prevalence of traditional sharing practices
[KL19].
Despite the dominance of industrial capitalism, the principles of the sharing economy persisted in
various forms. For instance, cooperative movements and mutual aid societies emerged in the 19th and
early 20th centuries as responses to the inequalities and social disruptions caused by industrialization.
These movements aimed to create more equitable economic systems by promoting collective ownership
and resource sharing [Jin+23].
The late 20th and early 21st centuries witnessed a resurgence of the sharing economy, driven by
technological advancements and changing socio-economic conditions. The advent of the internet and
digital platforms facilitated new forms of peer-to-peer sharing and collaboration, enabling individu-
als to share resources such as housing, transportation, and services on a global scale. This digital
transformation has been a key driver of the modern sharing economy, allowing for greater efficiency,
accessibility, and scalability.
The sharing economy’s development has also been influenced by broader economic and environmen-
tal considerations. Sustainable economic development, which seeks to balance economic growth with
environmental protection and social welfare, has become increasingly important in recent decades. The
sharing economy aligns with these goals by promoting the efficient use of resources, reducing waste,
and fostering community engagement [Zha+23; Jin+23].
Moreover, the sharing economy has been shaped by political and regulatory factors. In many
countries, the growth of the sharing economy has been supported by policies that encourage innovation
and entrepreneurship. However, it has also faced challenges related to regulation and governance, as
traditional regulatory frameworks often struggle to accommodate new business models and practices
[HL20].
In summary, the historical development of the sharing economy is a complex and multifaceted
process that reflects broader socio-economic transformations. From its roots in pre-industrial societies
to its modern incarnation as a digitally-enabled global phenomenon, the sharing economy has evolved
in response to changing technological, economic, and social conditions. This evolution highlights the
dynamic nature of economic systems and the ongoing interplay between innovation, regulation, and
societal needs [HL20; Zha+23; KL19; Jin+23].

5
2.3 Technological Enablers
Technological enablers play a crucial role in the development and expansion of the sharing economy.
One of the primary technological advancements facilitating this growth is the widespread adoption of
digital platforms. These platforms enable efficient matching of supply and demand, allowing users to
share resources such as cars, homes, and even skills with ease. The digital infrastructure supports real-
time communication, secure transactions, and user feedback systems, which are essential for building
trust among participants [Obe24; NWL23].
Blockchain technology is another significant enabler in the sharing economy. By providing a decen-
tralized and transparent ledger, blockchain enhances trust and security in transactions. This technology
can mitigate issues related to fraud and data manipulation, which are critical concerns in peer-to-peer
sharing models. Moreover, blockchain can streamline processes by automating contract execution
through smart contracts, thereby reducing the need for intermediaries and lowering transaction costs
[MTK24].
Mobile technology also plays a pivotal role in the sharing economy. The proliferation of smartphones
and mobile applications has made it easier for users to access sharing services anytime and anywhere.
Mobile apps provide a user-friendly interface for listing, searching, and booking shared resources, thus
enhancing user experience and convenience. The integration of GPS and other location-based services
further optimizes resource allocation by enabling precise tracking and efficient routing [BM17; Jin+23].
The Internet of Things (IoT) is another technological enabler that significantly impacts the sharing
economy. IoT devices can monitor and manage shared resources in real-time, providing valuable data
on usage patterns and resource availability. For instance, smart locks and sensors can facilitate seamless
access to shared properties, while telematics systems can track vehicle usage and maintenance needs in
car-sharing services. This real-time data collection and analysis help in optimizing resource utilization
and improving service quality [CM20; Zha+23].
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms are increasingly being integrated into
sharing economy platforms to enhance decision-making and personalization. AI can analyze vast
amounts of data to predict user preferences, optimize pricing strategies, and improve matching algo-
rithms. Machine learning models can also detect fraudulent activities and enhance security measures
by identifying unusual patterns in user behavior. These technologies contribute to a more efficient and
user-centric sharing economy [Obe24; Sad+23].
Despite these technological advancements, there are challenges and drawbacks associated with their
implementation. For instance, the reliance on digital platforms and mobile technology raises concerns
about data privacy and security. Users must trust that their personal information is protected and
that the platforms they use are secure from cyber threats. Additionally, the integration of advanced
technologies like blockchain and AI requires significant investment and technical expertise, which may
be a barrier for smaller or emerging sharing economy ventures [MTK24; Jim+24].
Furthermore, the rapid pace of technological change can lead to issues of obsolescence and the need
for continuous updates and maintenance. This can strain resources and divert attention from core
business activities. Moreover, the digital divide remains a significant challenge, as not all users have
equal access to the necessary technology or the skills to use it effectively. This can limit the inclusivity
and reach of sharing economy services [BM17; KL19].
In summary, technological enablers such as digital platforms, blockchain, mobile technology, IoT,
and AI are fundamental to the functioning and growth of the sharing economy. These technologies
enhance efficiency, security, and user experience, making it easier for individuals to share resources.
However, they also present challenges related to data privacy, security, investment, and inclusivity that
need to be addressed to ensure the sustainable development of the sharing economy [Obe24; NWL23;
BM17; Jin+23].

2.4 Economic Context

The economic context of the sharing economy is multifaceted, encompassing both benefits and draw-
backs that influence market dynamics. One of the primary economic benefits is the potential for
increased efficiency in resource utilization. By enabling the sharing of underutilized assets, the shar-
ing economy can reduce waste and optimize the use of existing resources, leading to economic gains
[Sad+23]. This efficiency is further enhanced by the extensive use of information and communication

6
technologies (ICT), which facilitate the creation of new markets and effective reputational mechanisms,
thereby addressing market failures that traditional public regulators have struggled to overcome.
However, the economic motivations for participating in the sharing economy vary significantly
across different sectors. For instance, while economic incentives are a major driver in accommodation
sharing, they are less critical in other sectors such as transportation or goods sharing [BM17]. This
sectoral variation suggests that the economic impact of the sharing economy is not uniform and depends
on the specific context and type of sharing activity involved.
The scalability and sustainability of sharing economy models are also crucial economic considera-
tions. A comprehensive analysis of various sharing platforms reveals that scalability is influenced by
how operations are organized and the indicators of sustainability embedded within these models. The
ability to scale operations effectively can lead to broader economic benefits, including job creation and
increased market participation. However, the study of these models also highlights the importance of
considering both scalability and sustainability to ensure long-term economic viability [Obe24].
Moreover, the sharing economy has been shown to positively impact energy efficiency and sustain-
able economic development. An empirical survey of the top ten Asian economies indicates a positive
relationship between the number of sharing economy users, the value generated by the sharing econ-
omy, and improvements in energy efficiency. This relationship underscores the potential of the sharing
economy to contribute to broader economic and environmental goals, aligning with sustainable devel-
opment objectives.
Despite these benefits, there are also significant drawbacks to consider. The introduction of new
regulations that limit the scope of the sharing economy could reduce incentives for innovation and
decrease economic efficiency [Paw18]. Such regulatory constraints could stifle the growth of the shar-
ing economy and its associated economic benefits. Additionally, the current research on the sharing
economy often relies on empirical analyses limited to specific regions or sectors, which may not fully
capture the global implications and potential of these models [Zha+23].
In summary, the economic context of the sharing economy is characterized by a complex interplay
of benefits and drawbacks. While it offers significant potential for resource optimization, market
efficiency, and sustainable development, the variability in economic motivations across sectors and
the impact of regulatory frameworks must be carefully considered to fully understand and harness its
economic potential.

3 Market Participants in the Sharing Economy

3.1 Providers
3.1.1 Individual Providers
Individual providers play a crucial role in the sharing economy, acting as the backbone of various
platforms by offering goods and services directly to consumers. These providers often leverage un-
derutilized assets, such as personal vehicles, spare rooms, or specialized skills, to generate income
and maximize resource efficiency. The sharing economy’s initial vision was to democratize access to
resources, enabling individuals to participate both as providers and consumers.
The flexibility and versatility of services offered by individual providers are significant advantages.
For instance, products that are infrequently used but essential for specific occasions tend to have higher
success rates in the sharing economy [SDB18]. This model allows providers to capitalize on assets that
would otherwise remain idle, thus promoting a more sustainable use of resources [Sad+23].
However, the sharing economy is not without its drawbacks. Public perception often highlights
various issues associated with the sharing economy, including concerns about the quality and reliability
of services provided by individuals [Har+24]. These concerns can be exacerbated by the lack of
standardized regulations and oversight, which can lead to inconsistent service quality and potential
exploitation of both providers and consumers.
Moreover, the motivations driving individual providers are multifaceted. While financial incentives
are a primary driver, social and environmental motivations also play a significant role. Providers
may be motivated by the desire to contribute to a more sustainable economy or to engage with their
community in meaningful ways. This complexity of motivations underscores the need for a nuanced
understanding of the sharing economy’s dynamics.

7
 The sharing economy’s development is a non-linear process influenced by both actor-driven trans-
formations and historical and geographical contexts [Obe23]. This complexity necessitates a range
of disciplinary perspectives and methodological approaches to fully understand the implications for
individual providers [FS17]. As the sharing economy continues to evolve, further research is needed to
explore the interaction effects between socio-demographic factors and the roles of users and providers
[BM17].
In summary, individual providers are integral to the sharing economy, offering both benefits and
challenges. Their participation promotes resource efficiency and sustainability, but also raises issues
related to service quality and regulatory oversight. Understanding the diverse motivations and contex-
tual factors influencing individual providers is essential for developing a more equitable and sustainable
sharing economy.

3.1.2 Corporate Providers

Corporate providers play a pivotal role in the sharing economy, acting as key facilitators and enablers
of various sharing platforms. These entities often bring substantial resources, technological expertise,
and market reach, which are essential for the scalability and sustainability of sharing economy models.
However, their involvement also introduces a complex interplay of benefits and drawbacks that need
to be carefully examined.
One of the primary advantages of corporate providers in the sharing economy is their ability to
leverage economies of scale. By utilizing their extensive infrastructure and financial resources, these
corporations can offer services at a lower cost, making them more accessible to a broader audience.
This can lead to increased participation and a more robust sharing economy ecosystem. Additionally,
corporate providers often have established brand reputations, which can enhance trust and reliability
among users, thereby fostering greater user engagement and retention [POB22].
Despite these benefits, the involvement of corporate providers is not without its challenges. One
significant concern is the potential for market monopolization. Large corporations may dominate the
market, stifling competition and innovation. This can lead to a homogenization of services and a
reduction in the diversity of offerings available to consumers. Furthermore, the profit-driven motives
of corporate providers may conflict with the original ethos of the sharing economy, which emphasizes
community, sustainability, and equitable resource distribution.
Another critical issue is the financial viability of sharing platforms with a strong environmental or
social orientation. These platforms often struggle to remain financially sustainable when competing
with profit-oriented corporate providers. The emphasis on profitability can overshadow the social and
environmental goals, leading to a mission drift where the primary focus shifts from sustainability to
financial gain [Obe24; Cur21]. This shift can undermine the potential positive impacts of the sharing
economy on society and the environment.
Moreover, the regulatory landscape presents a significant challenge for corporate providers. While
regulation is necessary to ensure fair practices and protect consumers, excessive regulation can hinder
innovation and adaptability. Striking a balance between regulation and freedom is crucial to maintain-
ing the dynamism of the sharing economy while ensuring that corporate providers adhere to ethical
and sustainable practices. Effective regulation should aim to prevent fraud, protect user data, and
ensure fair labor practices without stifling the innovative potential of the sharing economy [MBJ23;
Har+24].
The public perception of the sharing economy also plays a crucial role in the success of corporate
providers. The term "sharing economy" is often positively connotated, and businesses can benefit
from this positive perception. However, the term remains somewhat ambiguous, and its association
with well-known platforms like Airbnb and Uber can shape public understanding and expectations
[Har+24]. Corporate providers must navigate this landscape carefully, ensuring that their practices
align with the positive values associated with the sharing economy while also addressing any potential
drawbacks transparently.
In summary, corporate providers are integral to the sharing economy, offering significant benefits
such as economies of scale, enhanced trust, and increased accessibility. However, their involvement also
brings challenges, including the risk of market monopolization, mission drift, and regulatory hurdles.
Balancing these factors is essential for the sustainable growth and positive impact of the sharing
economy [Har+24; Cur21].

8
3.1.3 Motivations and Incentives
Motivations and incentives for providers in the sharing economy are multifaceted, encompassing eco-
nomic, social, and environmental dimensions. Providers are often driven by the potential for significant
cost savings and additional income. The sharing economy allows individuals to monetize underutilized
assets, such as vehicles or living spaces, thereby generating supplementary income streams. This eco-
nomic incentive is particularly appealing in times of financial uncertainty or for those seeking flexible
work arrangements.
Social motivations also play a crucial role. The sharing economy fosters a sense of community and
social interaction, which can be particularly appealing to individuals who value social connections and
collaborative consumption. Enhanced social interaction is a notable benefit, as it can lead to stronger
community ties and a sense of belonging. Additionally, the sharing economy can contribute to greater
employment opportunities, creating new jobs and potentially reducing unemployment rates [Sad+23].
Environmental incentives are another significant factor. Providers are often motivated by the
potential to reduce their environmental footprint. By participating in the sharing economy, they
can contribute to the reduction of net resource extraction and greenhouse gas emissions [CM20]. This
aligns with broader societal goals of sustainability and environmental conservation, making the sharing
economy an attractive option for environmentally conscious individuals.
However, the motivations and incentives for providers are not without their complexities. The
sharing economy can also present ethical challenges. For instance, fostering mutual trust among users
may inadvertently lead to ethical blind spots, where providers and users become less vigilant about the
negative externalities of sharing [Sha+22]. This can result in a willful ignorance of potential harms,
such as the exploitation of labor or the degradation of shared resources.
Moreover, the public perception of the sharing economy’s dark sides, such as the potential for
exploitation and the creation of precarious work conditions, can influence provider motivations. Media
analysis and surveys indicate that these negative aspects are increasingly recognized, which may affect
individuals’ willingness to participate as providers [Har+24]. Understanding these perceptions is crucial
for addressing the ethical and social implications of the sharing economy.
The socio-demographic factors also play a role in shaping motivations. While differences in moti-
vations between sectors are relatively large, variations among different socio-demographic groups are
smaller [BM17]. This suggests that while the type of sharing economy activity may significantly influ-
ence motivations, individual characteristics such as age, gender, and socioeconomic status may have a
more uniform impact across different sharing economy sectors.
In summary, the motivations and incentives for providers in the sharing economy are diverse and
influenced by economic, social, and environmental factors. While the potential for financial gain and
social interaction are strong motivators, ethical considerations and public perceptions of the sharing
economy’s drawbacks also play a critical role. Understanding these motivations is essential for devel-
oping sustainable and ethical sharing economy models that can benefit both providers and the broader
community.

3.2 Users
3.2.1 Demographics
Demographics play a crucial role in understanding the dynamics of market participants in the sharing
economy. The sharing economy, characterized by the redistribution and utilization of underused assets,
is influenced by various demographic factors that shape user behavior and preferences.
One significant demographic factor is age. Younger generations, particularly millennials and Gen-
eration Z, are more inclined to participate in the sharing economy. This trend is driven by their
familiarity with digital platforms and a preference for access over ownership. These age groups are
more likely to use services such as ride-sharing, accommodation sharing, and peer-to-peer lending,
which are facilitated by technological advancements. The authors of [GV21] indicate that the progress
of technology, especially the development of the Internet and mobile devices, has significantly con-
tributed to the awareness and accessibility of sharing economy services among younger demographics.
Income level is another critical demographic variable. Individuals with lower to middle incomes
are often more motivated to engage in the sharing economy due to the economic benefits it offers. For
instance, sharing economy platforms can provide cost savings and additional income opportunities,
making them attractive to those seeking to maximize their financial resources. According to [BM17],

9
economic motivations are a primary driver for using accommodation sharing services, highlighting the
importance of financial considerations in user participation.
Geographical location also influences participation in the sharing economy. Urban areas, with
their higher population densities and greater access to digital infrastructure, tend to have higher rates
of sharing economy activity. This is partly because urban residents face more significant challenges
related to space and transportation, making sharing services more practical and appealing [Aut15].
Finley (2013) maintains that the core of the sharing economy lies in capturing idling capacity and
redistributing it, which is particularly relevant in densely populated urban settings where resources
are often underutilized.
Education level is another demographic factor that impacts engagement in the sharing economy.
Higher levels of education are associated with greater awareness and understanding of the benefits
and mechanisms of sharing economy platforms. Educated individuals are more likely to adopt new
technologies and participate in innovative economic models, including the sharing economy. The iden-
tification and classification of sharing economy research, as outlined in [SB20], suggest that educated
users are more adept at navigating and utilizing these platforms effectively.
Gender also plays a role in shaping participation patterns. While both men and women participate
in the sharing economy, there may be differences in the types of services they use and their motivations
for doing so. For example, women might be more inclined to use sharing economy services related to
household and caregiving tasks, while men might prefer services related to transportation and tech-
nology. The study by [Sad+23] confirms the role of sharing economy benefits in achieving sustainable
development goals, which can vary based on gender-specific needs and preferences.
Furthermore, cultural factors and societal norms can influence the adoption and use of sharing
economy services. In some cultures, there may be a stronger emphasis on community and collective
use of resources, which aligns well with the principles of the sharing economy. Conversely, in cultures
that prioritize individual ownership and privacy, there may be more resistance to sharing economy
models. Curtis et al. [Cur21] define the sharing economy as a socio-economic system that leverages
technology to mediate markets, facilitating temporary access to underutilized goods, which can be
more or less accepted depending on cultural attitudes towards sharing and technology.
Overall, demographics such as age, income, geographical location, education level, gender, and cul-
tural background significantly influence the participation and behavior of users in the sharing economy.
Understanding these demographic factors is essential for developing targeted strategies to enhance user
engagement and optimize the benefits of the sharing economy for diverse population groups.

3.2.2 Usage Patterns

Usage patterns in the sharing economy are influenced by various factors, including economic, social, and
environmental benefits. These patterns are critical for understanding how different market participants
engage with sharing platforms and the implications for sustainable development.
The sharing economy facilitates the efficient use of resources by enabling temporary access to under-
utilized goods. This model encourages optimal use of technological and physical resources, reducing the
need for individuals to own items that must be maintained in working condition at all times [Zha+23].
This shift in ownership patterns can lead to significant energy savings and a reduction in resource
consumption, contributing to environmental sustainability.
Moreover, the sharing economy’s business models are designed to support sustainable consumption
and production. These models often incorporate innovative patterns that align with sustainability
goals, such as reducing waste and promoting the reuse of goods. By leveraging technology to mediate
two-sided markets, the sharing economy enables the temporary access to tangible, rivalrous goods,
which can help mitigate the environmental impact of overproduction and overconsumption [Cur21].
The motivations for participating in the sharing economy vary across different sectors. For instance,
some users are driven by economic incentives, such as cost savings and income generation, while others
are motivated by social factors, including community building and access to unique experiences [BM17].
These diverse motivations highlight the multifaceted nature of the sharing economy and its potential
to cater to a wide range of user needs and preferences.
In addition to economic and social benefits, the sharing economy also offers significant environ-
mental advantages. By promoting the efficient use of resources and reducing the need for ownership,
sharing platforms can help decrease the overall environmental footprint of consumption. This aligns

10
with the broader goals of sustainable development and the achievement of Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs) [Sad+23].
However, the sharing economy is not without its challenges. Existing definitions and analyses of
the sharing economy often lack consistency and integrity, which can hinder the development of effective
policies. To address these limitations, a unified model that reflects the diverse and complex nature of
the sharing economy is necessary. Such a model can provide a strategic roadmap for policymakers and
support the design and implementation of sustainable business models [KL19].
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s impact on traditional business models must be considered.
Updated operational approaches and configurations have been benchmarked against the sustainability
and scalability of traditional models, revealing the potential for sharing economy models to offer
more sustainable and scalable solutions [Obe24]. This comparison underscores the importance of
continuously evolving and adapting sharing economy practices to meet sustainability goals.
Overall, the sharing economy presents a unique opportunity to foster sustainable consumption
and production patterns. By understanding and analyzing usage patterns, stakeholders can develop
strategies to overcome barriers and create a supportive environment for peer-to-peer (P2P) sharing
initiatives [HG23]. This approach not only enhances the sharing economy’s contribution to sustainable
development but also ensures its long-term viability and success.

3.2.3 Motivations and Incentives

Motivations and incentives play a crucial role in understanding user behavior within the sharing econ-
omy. The investigation of user motivations is essential for analyzing whether innovations in the sharing
economy can truly drive a transition towards a more sustainable society [BM17]. Users are often mo-
tivated by a combination of economic, social, and environmental factors. Economic incentives, such
as cost savings and income generation, are significant drivers for participation in sharing economy
platforms. For instance, users may choose to engage in ride-sharing or home-sharing services to reduce
personal expenses or to earn additional income by renting out underutilized assets [BM17; Zha+23].
Social motivations also play a pivotal role. The sharing economy fosters a sense of community and
trust among participants, which can be a strong incentive for users. The ability to connect with others
and build social networks through shared experiences is a compelling factor for many individuals. This
social aspect can enhance user satisfaction and loyalty to sharing platforms [Har+24]. Additionally,
the sharing economy can provide access to resources and services that might otherwise be unavailable,
thereby promoting inclusivity and social equity [SDB18].
Environmental motivations are increasingly important as well. Many users are driven by the desire
to reduce their environmental footprint and contribute to sustainability. By participating in the sharing
economy, individuals can minimize waste and resource consumption, aligning their actions with broader
environmental goals. This is particularly relevant in the context of the growing awareness of climate
change and the need for sustainable practices [Obe23; Zha+23].
However, the motivations and incentives for participating in the sharing economy are not without
their drawbacks. The lack of a clear definition of the sharing economy and the diverse interpretations of
its practices can create confusion and inconsistency in user experiences [Zha+23; PH21]. Additionally,
the rapid growth and commercialization of sharing platforms have led to concerns about the erosion of
traditional sharing values, such as trust and reciprocity, which can undermine user motivations [PH21].
Furthermore, the scalability and sustainability of sharing economy models are critical factors that
influence user motivations. The ability of these models to adapt and grow while maintaining their core
values and benefits is essential for long-term success. Users are more likely to remain engaged if they
perceive that the platform can sustainably meet their needs and expectations [Obe23; Obe24]. The
typology of sharing economy business models, which includes various configurations and mechanisms,
provides insights into how these models can be optimized for scalability and sustainability [Obe23;
Cur21].
In summary, understanding the motivations and incentives of users in the sharing economy is vital
for assessing the potential of these platforms to drive sustainable societal transitions. Economic, social,
and environmental factors all play significant roles in shaping user behavior, while challenges related
to definition, commercialization, and scalability must be addressed to maintain user engagement and
satisfaction.

11
3.3 Platforms
3.3.1 Role and Function
The role and function of platforms in the sharing economy are pivotal in shaping the interactions
between market participants. These platforms serve as intermediaries that facilitate the exchange
of goods and services, thereby enabling the efficient utilization of resources. The sharing economy,
characterized by peer-to-peer exchanges, relies heavily on these digital platforms to connect users and
providers, ensuring that transactions are seamless and trustworthy.
One of the primary functions of sharing economy platforms is to provide a marketplace where
individuals can offer and access services. This marketplace function is crucial as it aggregates supply
and demand, making it easier for users to find what they need without extensive search costs. For
instance, platforms like Airbnb and Uber have revolutionized the accommodation and transportation
sectors by offering convenient and accessible services that were previously dominated by traditional
businesses [MBJ23].
Moreover, these platforms play a significant role in establishing trust among users. Trust is a
critical component in the sharing economy, as transactions often involve personal assets and services.
Platforms implement various mechanisms to build and maintain trust, such as user reviews, ratings,
and verification processes. These mechanisms help mitigate the risks associated with peer-to-peer
transactions and ensure a higher level of accountability and reliability [Tôt+22].
In addition to facilitating transactions and building trust, sharing economy platforms also con-
tribute to economic, social, and environmental benefits. Economically, they enable more efficient use
of resources by allowing individuals to monetize underutilized assets. This can lead to increased income
for providers and cost savings for users. Socially, these platforms can foster community engagement
and collaboration by connecting people with similar needs and interests. Environmentally, the sharing
economy promotes sustainability by reducing waste and encouraging the reuse of goods and services
[Sad+23].
However, the role of these platforms is not without its drawbacks. The rapid growth of the sharing
economy has raised concerns about its impact on traditional markets and regulatory frameworks. For
example, the entry of platforms like Uber and Airbnb has disrupted established industries, leading
to debates about fair competition and the need for regulation. There are also concerns about the
potential for these platforms to exacerbate issues such as job insecurity and housing shortages, as they
often operate in a legal gray area.
Furthermore, the concentration of market power in a few dominant platforms can lead to mo-
nopolistic behaviors, where these "top dogs" capture most of the market share and attention. This
concentration can stifle competition and innovation, making it difficult for new entrants to succeed.
It also raises questions about data privacy and the ethical use of user information, as these platforms
often collect and analyze vast amounts of data to optimize their services [Har+24].
The sharing economy’s reliance on digital platforms also highlights the importance of technological
infrastructure and digital literacy. Access to and proficiency with technology are essential for both
providers and users to participate effectively in the sharing economy. This reliance on technology can
create barriers for those who lack access or skills, potentially leading to digital divides and unequal
opportunities [Cur21].
In summary, the role and function of platforms in the sharing economy are multifaceted, encom-
passing the facilitation of transactions, the establishment of trust, and the generation of economic,
social, and environmental benefits. However, these platforms also pose challenges related to market
disruption, regulatory concerns, and the concentration of market power. As the sharing economy con-
tinues to evolve, it will be crucial to address these challenges to ensure that the benefits are maximized
while minimizing the drawbacks [Har+24; Sad+23; Cur21].

3.3.2 Revenue Models

Revenue models in the sharing economy are pivotal in determining the financial viability and sustain-
ability of platforms. These models primarily revolve around the monetization of access rather than
ownership, which aligns with the core principles of the sharing economy. One prominent revenue model
is the product-to-service pattern, exemplified by car-sharing businesses. This model highlights that
selling the right to use assets can be more profitable and valued by the market compared to selling
ownership of those assets [Cur21].

12
 The sharing economy business models (SEBMs) are designed to support sustainability performance.
These models are comprehensive and include various attributes that facilitate the design and imple-
mentation of SEBMs by academics, practitioners, and policymakers. The SEBM tool developed is
considered the most detailed description of business model attributes in the sharing economy litera-
ture to date [CM20].
Economic, social, and environmental motivations play a significant role in the participation of
peer-to-peer sharing. These motivations vary across different sectors of the sharing economy, socio-
demographic groups, and between users and providers [BM17]. This diversity in motivations necessi-
tates a flexible approach to revenue models to cater to the varied needs and expectations of participants.
Moreover, the sharing economy has transformed traditional markets, such as the hospitality sector,
by enabling new groups of providers in urban destinations. This transformation has rendered existing
regulations obsolete, as they cannot be applied to the microbusiness nature of new service providers.
The lack of data regarding the market further complicates the imposition of regulations [Paw18].
The sharing economy also faces challenges related to sustainability. Adding value to SEBMs re-
quires objective indicators to measure sustainability levels and make informed decisions towards a
sustainability transition. The dynamic nature of sustainable development adds complexity to defining
and achieving sustainability in the sharing economy [Aut15].
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s impact on energy efficiency and sustainable economic devel-
opment is significant, particularly in the top ten Asian economies. This impact highlights the practi-
cal significance for leading economies aiming to achieve high sustainability in economic development
[Zha+23].
In summary, revenue models in the sharing economy are multifaceted and must account for the
diverse motivations of participants, the transformation of traditional markets, and the challenges of
sustainability. These models are crucial for the financial viability and long-term success of sharing
economy platforms.

3.3.3 Regulatory Challenges

Regulatory challenges in the sharing economy are multifaceted and stem from the rapid evolution of
technology and business models that outpace traditional regulatory frameworks. One of the primary
issues is the difficulty in categorizing sharing economy platforms within existing legal and regulatory
structures. For instance, platforms like Airbnb and Uber operate in a gray area between traditional
service providers and digital intermediaries, complicating the application of existing laws [Paw18].
This ambiguity often leads to inconsistent regulatory responses across different jurisdictions, creating
a patchwork of rules that can be challenging for both platforms and users to navigate.
The adaptive and agile governance framework has been proposed as a solution to these challenges.
This approach emphasizes the need for governments to be flexible and responsive to technological inno-
vations and market changes [HL20]. By adopting more dynamic regulatory mechanisms, governments
can better address the unique characteristics of sharing economy platforms. However, implementing
such a framework requires a significant shift in traditional regulatory practices, which are often rigid
and slow to adapt.
Another significant challenge is the enforcement of regulations. The decentralized nature of sharing
economy platforms makes it difficult to monitor and enforce compliance. For example, ensuring that all
Airbnb listings comply with local zoning laws and safety regulations is a daunting task for municipal
authorities. This issue is further compounded by the global reach of these platforms, which often
operate across multiple legal jurisdictions with varying regulatory requirements [Obe23; Paw18].
The sharing economy also raises questions about labor rights and protections. Many sharing
economy platforms classify their workers as independent contractors rather than employees, which
exempts them from providing benefits such as health insurance, minimum wage, and job security.
This classification has been a point of contention and has led to numerous legal battles and calls for
regulatory reform to ensure fair treatment of workers in the sharing economy [Obe23; Jin+23].
Moreover, the environmental impact of the sharing economy is a double-edged sword. While it
has the potential to optimize resource use and reduce waste, it can also lead to increased consumption
and environmental degradation if not properly regulated. For instance, the proliferation of ride-sharing
services can lead to more vehicles on the road, contributing to traffic congestion and pollution. Effective
regulation is needed to balance these environmental impacts and ensure that the sharing economy
contributes positively to sustainability goals [Sad+23; Jin+23].

13
 Trust and safety are also critical regulatory concerns. The peer-to-peer nature of sharing economy
transactions can expose users to various risks, including fraud, theft, and personal harm. Ensuring
that platforms implement robust safety measures and dispute resolution mechanisms is essential for
building trust among users. Regulatory bodies must work closely with platforms to establish and
enforce standards that protect users while fostering innovation [POB22].
Lastly, the economic implications of the sharing economy cannot be overlooked. The rise of these
platforms has disrupted traditional industries, leading to job losses and economic displacement in
sectors such as hospitality and transportation. Regulators must consider the broader economic impact
and develop policies that support workers and businesses affected by these disruptions. This may
include retraining programs, financial assistance, and measures to promote economic diversification
[MTK24; Paw18].
In summary, the regulatory challenges posed by the sharing economy are complex and multifaceted,
requiring a nuanced and adaptive approach. Governments must balance the need for innovation with
the protection of public interests, ensuring that the benefits of the sharing economy are realized while
mitigating its potential drawbacks.

4 Benefits of the Sharing Economy

4.1 Economic Benefits
4.1.1 Cost Savings
Cost savings represent a significant economic benefit of the sharing economy. By enabling the shared
use of resources, individuals and businesses can reduce their expenses on goods and services. This
mechanism is particularly effective when the shared good is relatively expensive, but its usage by
the sharing economy participant is limited in terms of time or capacity. For instance, tool sharing
exemplifies this scenario, where users can access expensive tools for a fraction of the cost of ownership,
thereby saving money.
The sharing economy also facilitates cost savings through the reduction of redundant purchases.
When individuals share resources, the need for each person to own the same item diminishes, leading
to a decrease in overall consumption. This not only saves money for the users but also contributes
to a more sustainable economic model by reducing waste and promoting the efficient use of resources
[FS17].
Moreover, the sharing economy can lower costs by leveraging underutilized assets. For example,
platforms that allow individuals to rent out their homes or cars when they are not in use enable owners
to generate income from otherwise idle assets. This additional income can offset the costs of ownership,
such as maintenance and insurance, making it more affordable for individuals to own high-value items
[BM17].
The economic benefits of cost savings in the sharing economy extend to businesses as well. Com-
panies can reduce operational costs by sharing resources such as office space, equipment, and even
employees. This collaborative approach can lead to significant savings on overhead expenses, allowing
businesses to allocate their resources more efficiently and invest in other areas of growth [CM20].
Furthermore, the sharing economy can enhance cost efficiency through economies of scale. As more
people participate in sharing platforms, the cost per user decreases, making it more affordable for
everyone involved. This is particularly evident in transportation services, where ride-sharing platforms
can reduce the cost of travel for users by pooling rides and optimizing routes [Sad+23].
However, it is important to note that the cost-saving benefits of the sharing economy are not
without challenges. The microbusiness nature of sharing raises enforcement concerns, as regulatory
frameworks struggle to keep pace with the rapid growth of sharing platforms. Additionally, the lack
of cooperation from platforms in providing data to academics hinders the accurate assessment of
the sharing economy’s growth and scope, which is crucial for understanding its full economic impact
[Paw18].
In summary, cost savings are a key economic benefit of the sharing economy, driven by the efficient
use of resources, reduction of redundant purchases, and leveraging of underutilized assets. These
savings benefit both individuals and businesses, contributing to a more sustainable and cost-effective
economic model. However, the realization of these benefits requires addressing regulatory and data-
sharing challenges to ensure the sharing economy’s continued growth and positive impact.

14
4.1.2 Income Generation
Income generation within the sharing economy is a multifaceted topic that encompasses various mech-
anisms through which individuals and entities can derive financial benefits. The sharing economy,
characterized by peer-to-peer exchanges facilitated by digital platforms, has significantly altered tra-
ditional economic models by enabling individuals to monetize underutilized assets and skills.
One of the primary ways the sharing economy fosters income generation is through the provision of
platforms that connect service providers directly with consumers. For instance, platforms like Airbnb
and Uber have revolutionized the hospitality and transportation sectors, respectively, by allowing
individuals to offer their homes or driving services for a fee. This model not only provides a source of
income for the providers but also offers consumers more affordable and flexible options compared to
traditional services.
The economic benefits of the sharing economy extend beyond individual income generation. Ac-
cording to, the sharing economy emerged as a response to the need for cost reduction and profit
maximization among individual producers. This economic phenomenon has since evolved, encom-
passing a wide range of industries and enabling various forms of income generation. The authors of
[KL19] highlight that the sharing economy’s growth is driven by both intrinsic motivations, such as
environmental and social benefits, and extrinsic economic motivations, which include financial gains.
Furthermore, the sharing economy contributes to sustainable economic development by promoting
efficient resource utilization. The study by [Jin+23] emphasizes that the sharing economy enhances
financial flexibility and supports sustainable innovation, which in turn contributes to the achievement
of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This positive association between the economic benefits of
the sharing economy and SDG achievement underscores the broader economic impact of this model.
However, the sharing economy is not without its drawbacks. The literature review by [Obe24]
indicates that while sustainability is a key theme in the sharing economy, the nuances of its various
aspects are often overlooked. This suggests that the economic benefits of the sharing economy may be
accompanied by challenges related to sustainability and equitable resource distribution. Additionally,
the study by [NWL23] points out that income inequality can restrict the expected benefits from sharing
economy activities, particularly in developing countries. This highlights the need for a more nuanced
understanding of how income generation through the sharing economy can be optimized to ensure
equitable benefits across different socio-economic groups.
Moreover, the sharing economy’s impact on traditional market structures cannot be ignored. The
authors of [SDB18] discuss the contemporary status of the sharing economy, noting that while business
models and definitions are extensively discussed, the practical knowledge of how designers can make a
viable difference in this space remains limited. This gap in practical knowledge suggests that there is
still much to learn about how the sharing economy can be harnessed to maximize income generation
while addressing potential drawbacks.
In summary, income generation within the sharing economy is a complex and dynamic process
that offers significant economic benefits. By enabling individuals to monetize underutilized assets
and skills, the sharing economy provides new avenues for financial gain. However, it also presents
challenges related to sustainability, income inequality, and the disruption of traditional market struc-
tures. Addressing these challenges requires a comprehensive understanding of the sharing economy’s
mechanisms and their broader economic implications [Obe24; BM17; FS17; Sad+23].

4.1.3 Market Efficiency

Market efficiency in the context of the sharing economy is a multifaceted concept that encompasses
various dimensions, including resource optimization, cost reduction, and enhanced accessibility. The
sharing economy aims to optimize under-utilized resources, thereby increasing overall market efficiency.
For instance, platforms like Etsy and InstaCart facilitate the distribution of artisanal products and
grocery deliveries, respectively, which exemplifies the efficient use of resources that might otherwise
remain idle.
One of the primary economic benefits of the sharing economy is its potential to reduce transaction
costs. By leveraging digital platforms, the sharing economy minimizes the need for intermediaries,
thereby lowering the costs associated with traditional market transactions. This reduction in trans-
action costs can lead to more competitive pricing and increased market participation, which in turn
enhances market efficiency [Zha+23].

15
 However, the empirical investigation of market efficiency in the sharing economy is challenged by
limited data availability at the country level. The global sharing economy index, which measures the
level of sharing economy usage in a country, provides a useful metric for assessing market efficiency.
This index combines online traffic and the number of active suppliers in the peer-to-peer industry,
offering a normalized per capita usage measure [HL20].
Despite these benefits, the sharing economy also presents certain drawbacks that can impact market
efficiency. One significant issue is the lack of consistent definitions and perspectives among scholars,
which complicates the understanding and measurement of market efficiency in this context. The
diverse and multidimensional characteristics of the sharing economy make it difficult to develop a
comprehensive framework for assessing its impact on market efficiency [KL19].
Moreover, the debate over regulation further complicates the assessment of market efficiency. Schol-
ars are divided on whether government intervention is necessary to regulate sharing economy platforms.
Some argue that regulation is essential to address market failures, while others believe that excessive
regulation could stifle innovation and reduce market efficiency. This ongoing debate highlights the
complexity of achieving an optimal level of regulation that balances the benefits and drawbacks of the
sharing economy [Paw18].
In addition to regulatory challenges, the sharing economy’s impact on market efficiency is also
influenced by its scalability and sustainability. Different resource-use configurations can affect the
scalability and sustainability of sharing economy models, which in turn impacts market efficiency.
Understanding the underlying mechanisms that explain these issues is crucial for developing effective
strategies to enhance market efficiency in the sharing economy [Obe24].
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s ability to optimize resource use is not without contradictions.
For example, while the sharing economy aims to make better use of under-utilized resources, some
platforms also promote the use of new resources, which can undermine the goal of resource optimization.
This contradiction highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of how different sharing
economy models impact market efficiency [CM20].
Overall, the sharing economy offers significant potential for improving market efficiency through
resource optimization, cost reduction, and enhanced accessibility. However, achieving this potential
requires addressing various challenges, including data limitations, regulatory debates, and the diverse
characteristics of sharing economy models. By understanding and addressing these challenges, pol-
icymakers and stakeholders can better harness the economic benefits of the sharing economy while
mitigating its drawbacks [Obe24; HL20; Zha+23; KL19; Paw18].

4.2 Social Benefits

4.2.1 Community Building
Community building is a significant social benefit of the sharing economy, fostering stronger social ties
and enhancing communal interactions. The sharing economy facilitates the creation of networks where
individuals can share resources, services, and experiences, thereby promoting a sense of community
and mutual support. This is particularly evident in platforms like Airbnb and Uber, which not only
provide economic benefits but also encourage social interactions among users.
The design community plays a crucial role in this process by developing innovative concepts that
enhance the social and sustainable features of the sharing economy. It is essential to design new,
innovative concepts rather than merely placing old products in new business models. This approach
helps in realizing the full potential of the sharing economy, making it more socially beneficial [SDB18].
Moreover, the sharing economy’s ability to connect people from different backgrounds and regions
contributes to a more inclusive society. By enabling peer-to-peer interactions, it breaks down tradi-
tional barriers and fosters a sense of belonging among participants. This inclusivity is a cornerstone of
the sharing economy, as it allows for diverse participation and the sharing of a wide range of resources
and services [HL20].
However, the sharing economy is not without its challenges. Some communities experience negative
externalities, such as increased rental prices due to the proliferation of home-sharing platforms. While
capping and taxing measures have been proposed to mitigate these effects, the long-term impact on
rental prices remains uncertain, indicating a need for further research [MBJ23].
Despite these challenges, the sharing economy’s potential for community building is substantial.
It offers a platform for collaborative consumption, where individuals can share resources and services,

16
leading to more sustainable and efficient use of assets. This collaborative approach not only benefits
the environment but also strengthens social bonds within communities [Sad+23].
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s diverse and multidimensional characteristics make it difficult
to define comprehensively. Each scholar has a unique perspective on the sharing economy, which adds
to the complexity of understanding its full impact on community building. Nevertheless, the common
thread across these perspectives is the emphasis on the social benefits and the potential for creating
stronger, more connected communities [KL19].
In summary, community building is a pivotal aspect of the sharing economy, offering numerous social
benefits. By fostering inclusivity, promoting mutual support, and encouraging sustainable practices,
the sharing economy has the potential to create more cohesive and resilient communities. However,
addressing the associated challenges, such as the impact on rental prices, requires ongoing research
and innovative solutions.

4.2.2 Access Over Ownership

Access over ownership is a fundamental principle of the sharing economy, emphasizing the utilization
of resources without the necessity of owning them. This paradigm shift has significant social benefits,
particularly in fostering community engagement and reducing individual financial burdens. By pri-
oritizing access, individuals can leverage shared resources, such as vehicles, tools, and living spaces,
which might otherwise be financially inaccessible if purchased outright [KL19].
The sharing economy’s focus on access over ownership also promotes a more sustainable use of
resources. By sharing assets, the overall demand for new products decreases, leading to a reduction in
production and, consequently, a lower environmental impact. This model supports the efficient use of
existing resources, aligning with sustainable development goals [Sad+23; Jin+23]. Furthermore, the
sharing economy facilitates the redistribution of underutilized assets, ensuring that resources are used
to their full potential rather than remaining idle [Obe23; CM20].
From a social perspective, access over ownership can enhance social cohesion and trust within
communities. Shared resources often necessitate interaction and cooperation among users, fostering a
sense of community and mutual support. This can be particularly beneficial in urban environments
where social isolation is more prevalent. The collaborative nature of the sharing economy encourages
individuals to engage with one another, building stronger social networks and enhancing communal
ties [MTK24; Che+23].
Moreover, the financial implications of access over ownership are significant. By reducing the
need for large capital expenditures on assets, individuals can allocate their financial resources more
efficiently. This can lead to increased economic stability and flexibility, particularly for those in lower-
income brackets. The sharing economy thus democratizes access to goods and services, making them
available to a broader segment of the population [Jin+23].
However, it is essential to recognize that the shift towards access over ownership is not without
its challenges. Issues such as the reliability and maintenance of shared resources, as well as the
potential for overuse and degradation, must be addressed to ensure the long-term viability of this
model. Additionally, regulatory frameworks need to evolve to accommodate the unique characteristics
of the sharing economy, ensuring that both providers and users are protected [CM20].
In summary, access over ownership within the sharing economy offers substantial social benefits by
promoting resource efficiency, enhancing community engagement, and providing financial flexibility.
While challenges remain, the potential for positive social impact is significant, making it a critical area
of focus for both policymakers and researchers [Obe24].

4.2.3 Inclusivity
Inclusivity within the sharing economy is a multifaceted concept that encompasses various social
benefits, particularly in terms of accessibility and participation. The sharing economy has the potential
to democratize access to resources and services, thereby fostering a more inclusive society. This
inclusivity is evident in the way sharing economy platforms can lower the barriers to entry for both
consumers and providers, enabling a broader segment of the population to participate in economic
activities that were previously inaccessible to them.
One of the primary social benefits of the sharing economy is its ability to provide opportunities for
individuals who might otherwise be marginalized in traditional economic systems. For instance, people

17
with limited financial resources can access goods and services through sharing platforms without the
need for ownership, which can be prohibitively expensive. This aspect of the sharing economy aligns
with the broader goals of sustainable development by promoting equitable access to resources [Aut15].
Moreover, the sharing economy can enhance social inclusion by fostering community engagement
and collaboration. Platforms that facilitate the sharing of goods, services, and information can help
build social capital by connecting individuals and communities. This connectivity can lead to stronger
social networks and a sense of belonging, which are crucial components of social well-being. The
integrative model of the sharing economy, which emphasizes the sharing of information, materials, and
relationships, underscores the importance of these social connections [KL19].
However, the inclusivity of the sharing economy is not without its challenges. There are concerns
about the sustainability and equity of these platforms. While some sharing economy models have
remained sustainable, others have faced criticism for their environmental and social impacts. The
literature indicates that the sustainability of sharing economy platforms varies significantly, with some
models being more effective in promoting long-term social and environmental benefits than others
[Obe24].
Additionally, the inclusivity of the sharing economy can be compromised by issues related to trust
and regulation. Trust is a critical factor in the success of sharing economy platforms, as it influences
users’ willingness to participate. The literature highlights the importance of trust in the sharing
economy, noting that it is essential for the effective organization and operation of these platforms.
Regulatory challenges also play a significant role in shaping the inclusivity of the sharing economy.
Inconsistent or inadequate regulations can create barriers to entry for certain groups, thereby limiting
the potential for inclusive participation.
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s impact on traditional businesses and labor markets raises
questions about its inclusivity. While the sharing economy can create new opportunities for employ-
ment and income generation, it can also disrupt existing industries and lead to precarious working
conditions for some workers. The literature suggests that the sharing economy’s impact on traditional
businesses and labor markets is complex and multifaceted, with both positive and negative implications
for inclusivity [Obe23].
In summary, the sharing economy holds significant promise for enhancing inclusivity by democratiz-
ing access to resources, fostering community engagement, and providing new economic opportunities.
However, realizing this potential requires addressing the challenges related to sustainability, trust, reg-
ulation, and the impact on traditional businesses and labor markets. By navigating these challenges,
the sharing economy can contribute to a more inclusive and equitable society [Obe23; Obe24; Aut15;
Har+24; KL19].

4.3 Environmental Benefits

4.3.1 Resource Optimization
Resource optimization within the sharing economy framework presents a significant opportunity for
enhancing environmental benefits. By leveraging shared resources, the sharing economy can reduce
the overall consumption of goods and services, thereby minimizing waste and promoting sustainability.
This approach aligns with the principles of the circular economy, which emphasizes the reuse, recycling,
and efficient utilization of resources to mitigate environmental impact.
The sharing economy facilitates the efficient use of resources by enabling multiple users to access
the same asset, thereby reducing the need for individual ownership. This model not only decreases the
production of new goods but also extends the lifecycle of existing products. For instance, platforms that
allow for the sharing of vehicles, tools, and accommodations can significantly lower the demand for new
products, leading to a reduction in resource extraction and manufacturing emissions. The authors of
[FS17] indicate that the novelty and technological sophistication associated with the sharing economy
contribute to its perceived trendiness and progressiveness, which can further drive its adoption and
environmental benefits.
Moreover, the sharing economy can address the issue of improper waste management, which is a
critical environmental concern. By promoting the reuse and sharing of goods, the sharing economy
can help reduce the volume of waste generated, thus alleviating the burden on waste management
systems and reducing environmental pollution. This is particularly relevant in rural areas, where

18
waste management infrastructure may be less developed, and the sharing economy can play a pivotal
role in enhancing sustainability [Sad+23].
However, it is essential to recognize that the sharing economy is not without its challenges. One
significant drawback is the potential for market incumbents to incur losses due to the disruptive nature
of sharing economy models. This disruption can lead to resistance from established businesses and
regulatory challenges, which may hinder the widespread adoption of sharing economy practices. Hong
and Lee suggest that while the public may enjoy the dispersed benefits of the sharing economy, the
negative impact on market incumbents could be detrimental to society if not managed appropriately.
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s success in resource optimization is contingent upon the ethical
behavior of its participants. Recent discoveries in psychological and behavioral sciences highlight
that individuals using sharing economy platforms may exhibit ethical blind spots, willfully ignore
relevant information, or have access to incorrect information, all of which can undermine the potential
environmental benefits [Sha+22]. Addressing these behavioral issues is crucial for maximizing the
positive impact of the sharing economy on resource optimization.
In addition to behavioral considerations, the sharing economy’s impact on resource optimization
is influenced by the institutional qualities of governments. Effective regulation and support from
governmental institutions can enhance the sharing economy’s ability to optimize resources and achieve
environmental benefits. Hong and Lee [HL20] present empirical evidence that highlights the association
between sharing economy growth and various institutional qualities, underscoring the importance of a
supportive regulatory environment.
Overall, while the sharing economy offers substantial potential for resource optimization and envi-
ronmental benefits, it is essential to address the associated challenges and ensure ethical behavior and
supportive regulatory frameworks. By doing so, the sharing economy can contribute significantly to
sustainable development and the efficient use of resources.

4.3.2 Reduction in Waste

Reduction in waste is a significant environmental benefit of the sharing economy. The sharing economy
promotes the efficient use of resources by encouraging the sharing and reuse of goods, which can lead to
a substantial decrease in waste generation. This is particularly evident in sectors such as transportation,
accommodation, and consumer goods, where sharing platforms facilitate the use of existing resources
rather than the production of new ones [Har+24].
One of the primary ways the sharing economy reduces waste is through the concept of collaborative
consumption. By sharing goods and services, individuals can maximize the utility of items that would
otherwise be underutilized. For example, car-sharing services allow multiple users to access a single
vehicle, reducing the need for each person to own a car. This not only decreases the number of vehicles
produced but also reduces the associated waste from manufacturing and disposal processes [Har+24;
Paw18].
Furthermore, the sharing economy encourages the extension of product lifecycles. Items that might
be discarded after a single use can be shared among multiple users, thereby prolonging their usability
and delaying their entry into the waste stream. This practice is particularly beneficial for high-value
items such as electronics and household appliances, which often contain hazardous materials that can
be harmful to the environment if not disposed of properly [Jim+24].
In addition to reducing physical waste, the sharing economy also promotes the conservation of
natural resources. By facilitating the shared use of goods, these platforms help to decrease the demand
for raw materials needed for production. This can lead to a reduction in resource extraction activities,
which are often associated with significant environmental degradation, including deforestation, water
pollution, and loss of biodiversity [Obe24; Har+24].
However, it is important to recognize that the sharing economy is not without its challenges. While
it has the potential to reduce waste, it can also contribute to excessive consumption if not managed
properly. For instance, the ease of access to shared goods and services might encourage overuse, leading
to increased wear and tear and, ultimately, more waste. Additionally, some sharing economy platforms
may prioritize profit over sustainability, resulting in practices that are not environmentally friendly
[Obe23; Obe24].
Despite these challenges, the sharing economy holds considerable promise for waste reduction.
By fostering a culture of sharing and reuse, it can help to mitigate the environmental impact of
consumerism. Future research should focus on identifying best practices for maximizing the waste

19
reduction potential of sharing economy platforms while addressing the associated challenges. This will
require a collaborative effort from policymakers, businesses, and consumers to ensure that the sharing
economy contributes to a more sustainable future [Obe24; SDB18; Aki+21].

4.3.3 Sustainability
Sustainability within the sharing economy is a multifaceted concept that encompasses environmental,
social, and economic dimensions. The environmental benefits of the sharing economy are particularly
significant, as they contribute to the reduction of resource consumption and waste generation. By
promoting the use of shared resources, the sharing economy can lead to a decrease in the production
of new goods, thereby reducing the environmental footprint associated with manufacturing processes
[Obe24; Cur21].
One of the primary environmental advantages of the sharing economy is its potential to lower
greenhouse gas emissions. For instance, shared mobility services, such as car-sharing and bike-sharing,
can reduce the number of privately owned vehicles on the road. This reduction in vehicle ownership
not only decreases traffic congestion but also leads to lower emissions of carbon dioxide and other
pollutants [Obe24; Jim+24]. Additionally, the use of electric vehicles within these shared mobility
services can further enhance their environmental benefits by minimizing the reliance on fossil fuels.
The sharing economy also promotes the efficient use of resources by extending the lifecycle of
products. Platforms that facilitate the sharing of goods, such as tools, clothing, and electronics,
enable multiple users to benefit from a single item, thereby reducing the need for new products and
the associated environmental costs of production and disposal [CM20; Cur21]. This practice aligns
with the principles of a circular economy, where the focus is on maintaining the value of products,
materials, and resources for as long as possible.
However, the scalability of sharing economy models poses challenges to sustainability. As these
models expand, there is a risk that their environmental benefits may be compromised. For example,
the growth of platforms like Uber and Airbnb has led to increased demand for services that can result
in higher energy consumption and resource use. The transition from small-scale, community-based
sharing initiatives to large-scale commercial operations can dilute the sustainability benefits initially
observed.
Moreover, the sharing economy’s impact on sustainability is not uniformly positive. The envi-
ronmental benefits can vary significantly depending on the specific business model and the context
in which it operates. Some studies have highlighted the existence of a design-implementation gap,
where the theoretical sustainability potential of sharing economy business models is not fully realized
in practice. This gap underscores the need for robust tools and frameworks to support the design and
implementation of sustainable sharing economy business models [CM20].
Despite these challenges, the sharing economy holds promise for advancing environmental sustain-
ability. By fostering a culture of sharing and collaboration, it encourages more sustainable consumption
patterns and reduces the overall demand for new products. Future research should focus on developing
quantitative methods to assess the sustainability performance of sharing economy models and explore
ways to enhance their scalability without compromising their environmental benefits [Obe24].
In summary, the sharing economy offers significant environmental benefits by promoting resource
efficiency, reducing emissions, and extending product lifecycles. However, the scalability of these
models and the design-implementation gap present challenges that need to be addressed to fully realize
their sustainability potential. Continued research and innovation are essential to ensure that the
sharing economy contributes positively to environmental sustainability.

5 Drawbacks of the Sharing Economy

5.1 Economic Drawbacks
5.1.1 Income Inequality
Income inequality is a significant economic drawback associated with the sharing economy. The sharing
economy, while promoting resource efficiency and sustainability, often exacerbates existing disparities
in income distribution. This phenomenon can be attributed to several factors inherent in the structure
and operation of sharing economy platforms.

20
 Firstly, the sharing economy tends to favor individuals who already possess certain assets, such as
property or vehicles, which they can leverage to generate additional income. This creates a scenario
where wealthier individuals, who can afford to own and maintain these assets, benefit disproportion-
ately compared to those without such resources. Consequently, the income gap between asset-rich and
asset-poor individuals widens [BM17; Sad+23].
Moreover, the sharing economy often operates in a regulatory gray area, which can lead to tax
avoidance and evasion. Platform-based markets like Uber and Airbnb have been criticized for enabling
such practices, which further contribute to income inequality. The informal nature of labor in the
sharing economy, characterized by low entry barriers and minimal regulatory oversight, allows for
the participation of unskilled workers. However, this informality also means that these workers often
lack access to benefits and protections typically associated with formal employment, such as health
insurance and retirement plans [PH21].
Additionally, the cost of capital is a significant barrier in the sharing economy, particularly for small
and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in developing countries. High capital costs can prevent these
businesses from fully participating in the sharing economy, thereby limiting their potential for income
generation and economic growth. This barrier is particularly pronounced in regions where access to
affordable financing is limited, further entrenching income inequality.
Furthermore, the environmental benefits of the sharing economy, while positive, have been found
to have an insignificant impact on achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs) in certain contexts.
For instance, in Vietnam, the implementation of energy efficiency measures within the sharing economy
has been weak, resulting in minimal environmental benefits. This inefficacy undermines the potential
for the sharing economy to contribute to broader economic and social development, which could help
mitigate income inequality [Sad+23].
The sharing economy also presents challenges related to market segmentation and socio-demographic
disparities. Different types of sharers exhibit varying motivations and socio-demographic compositions,
which can influence their ability to benefit from the sharing economy. For example, younger individu-
als may be more motivated to participate in the sharing economy due to their familiarity with digital
platforms, while older individuals may face barriers related to technology adoption. These differences
can lead to unequal opportunities and outcomes, further exacerbating income inequality [BM17].
In summary, while the sharing economy offers numerous benefits, it also poses significant challenges
related to income inequality. The concentration of benefits among asset-rich individuals, regulatory
loopholes, high capital costs, and socio-demographic disparities all contribute to widening the income
gap. Addressing these issues requires coordinated efforts to enhance the sharing economy’s technology,
governance, and operation while ensuring that its benefits are more equitably distributed [Jin+23].

5.1.2 Market Disruption

Market disruption is a significant economic drawback of the sharing economy. The rapid rise of sharing
economy platforms has led to substantial shifts in traditional market structures, often resulting in ad-
verse effects for established businesses. These platforms, by leveraging underutilized assets and offering
services at lower costs, can undermine conventional business models, leading to market instability and
job losses in traditional sectors [WBS20; PH21].
One of the primary mechanisms through which the sharing economy disrupts markets is by altering
value creation, delivery, and capture processes. Traditional businesses, which rely on established
methods of value generation and distribution, find themselves at a disadvantage when competing with
agile, technology-driven sharing platforms. These platforms can quickly adapt to market demands and
optimize resource utilization, thereby offering more competitive pricing and convenience to consumers
[CM20]. This shift not only affects the profitability of traditional businesses but also forces them to
rethink their operational strategies and business models to remain relevant.
Moreover, the sharing economy’s emphasis on peer-to-peer transactions and platform-based services
can lead to a reduction in consumer loyalty to traditional brands. As consumers increasingly turn
to sharing platforms for cost-effective and flexible solutions, traditional businesses may experience a
decline in their customer base. This erosion of brand loyalty can further exacerbate the financial
challenges faced by these businesses, making it difficult for them to sustain their operations in the long
term [SB20].
The market disruption caused by the sharing economy also extends to regulatory challenges. Tradi-
tional businesses often operate within well-defined regulatory frameworks that ensure fair competition

21
and consumer protection. However, sharing economy platforms frequently operate in a regulatory gray
area, exploiting loopholes and benefiting from less stringent regulations. This regulatory disparity
can create an uneven playing field, where traditional businesses are burdened with compliance costs
and legal constraints, while sharing platforms enjoy greater operational freedom [Sad+23]. Conse-
quently, this imbalance can stifle innovation and growth in traditional sectors, further entrenching the
dominance of sharing economy platforms.
Additionally, the sharing economy’s impact on labor markets cannot be overlooked. The rise of
gig work and freelance opportunities facilitated by sharing platforms has led to a shift away from
stable, full-time employment towards more precarious, short-term engagements. While this flexibility
can be advantageous for some workers, it often comes at the cost of job security, benefits, and fair
wages. Traditional businesses, which typically offer more stable employment conditions, may struggle
to compete with the cost advantages that sharing platforms derive from their gig-based labor models
[Obe23]. This shift in labor dynamics can lead to increased economic inequality and reduced overall
job quality in the market.
Furthermore, the environmental implications of market disruption in the sharing economy are
complex. While sharing platforms can promote more efficient use of resources and reduce waste, they
can also lead to increased consumption and environmental degradation. For instance, the convenience
and affordability of ride-sharing services may encourage more frequent use of personal transportation,
contributing to higher emissions and traffic congestion. Traditional businesses, which may have invested
in sustainable practices and technologies, could find their efforts undermined by the environmental
externalities associated with the sharing economy [Jin+23].
In summary, market disruption is a multifaceted economic drawback of the sharing economy, af-
fecting traditional businesses, regulatory frameworks, labor markets, and environmental sustainability.
The competitive pressures exerted by sharing platforms necessitate significant adaptations from tradi-
tional businesses, which must navigate the challenges of maintaining profitability, regulatory compli-
ance, and labor standards in an increasingly dynamic and competitive market landscape.

5.1.3 Job Security

Job security within the sharing economy presents a significant economic drawback. The nature of
the sharing economy often leads to precarious employment conditions, as it typically relies on gig and
freelance work rather than traditional full-time employment. This shift can result in a lack of job
stability and benefits for workers, such as health insurance, retirement plans, and paid leave, which
are commonly associated with conventional employment models.
The sharing economy’s emphasis on flexibility and short-term contracts can undermine long-term
job security. Workers in this sector frequently face unpredictable income streams and job insecurity,
as their employment is contingent on fluctuating demand and platform policies. This instability can
lead to financial uncertainty and stress for individuals who depend on these jobs for their livelihood.
Moreover, the sharing economy can exacerbate existing inequalities in the labor market. For
instance, workers in smaller cities may experience fewer opportunities and benefits from the sharing
economy compared to those in larger urban areas. A study among city majors in the US revealed that
while 56% of majors in large cities acknowledged significant impacts of the sharing economy, only 9%
of majors in smaller cities reported similar effects. This disparity suggests that the economic benefits
of the sharing economy are not evenly distributed, potentially leaving workers in smaller cities at a
disadvantage [Paw18].
Additionally, the sharing economy’s reliance on digital platforms can create barriers for workers
who lack access to technology or digital literacy. This digital divide can further marginalize certain
groups, limiting their ability to participate in and benefit from the sharing economy. As a result, these
workers may face even greater job insecurity and economic instability [Jin+23].
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s impact on traditional industries can lead to job displacement.
As more consumers turn to sharing economy services, traditional businesses may experience reduced
demand, leading to layoffs and job losses. This shift can have a ripple effect on the broader economy, as
displaced workers may struggle to find new employment opportunities in an increasingly competitive
job market [Har+24].
In summary, while the sharing economy offers flexibility and new opportunities for some workers, it
also poses significant challenges to job security. The reliance on gig and freelance work, coupled with
the uneven distribution of benefits and the potential for job displacement, underscores the need for

22
policies and regulations that protect workers’ rights and ensure fair and stable employment conditions
in this evolving economic landscape [Har+24; Paw18; Jin+23].

5.2 Social Drawbacks

5.2.1 Trust and Safety
Trust and safety are critical concerns in the sharing economy, particularly due to the nature of transac-
tions that often involve personal interactions and the exchange of goods or services between strangers.
The importance of trust-generating mechanisms on sharing economy platforms cannot be overstated.
These mechanisms include past ratings, personal identification, online communication, and extra-
platform reputational capital [FS17]. Such mechanisms are essential for fostering a sense of security
and reliability among users, which is fundamental for the success of these platforms.
The sharing economy’s reliance on trust is further complicated by the potential for market failures.
Regulatory frameworks are necessary to ensure the efficient delivery of services while protecting all
parties involved, including service providers, consumers, and third parties [HL20]. Without proper
regulation, the rapid growth of sharing economy industries could lead to significant issues, such as
fraud, exploitation, and a lack of accountability.
Moreover, the role of consumers in the sharing economy is multifaceted. Consumers can either
provide resources to others or use resources from others, which adds another layer of complexity to
trust and safety concerns [Har+24]. This dual role necessitates robust verification processes to ensure
that all participants are trustworthy. For instance, platforms may require users to verify their identities
using official documents like ID cards or driver’s licenses, similar to practices employed by ride-sharing
services such as Uber and Share Now. Additionally, implementing reciprocal review and evaluation
systems, as seen on platforms like Airbnb and Blablacar, can enhance transparency and trust among
users [HG23].
The sharing economy also shifts certain responsibilities from formal employment structures to
individual consumers. This shift can reduce expenses related to insurance, job security, and protection,
but it also places a greater burden on consumers to ensure their own safety and security [PH21]. This
model relies heavily on social collaboration and individual responsibility, which can be problematic if
not managed properly.
Furthermore, the transparency and traceability of blockchain-based sharing economy systems can
significantly benefit all parties involved. These systems are designed to be highly transparent and
difficult to manipulate, which can help businesses in tourism, hospitality, and other related industries
adapt to potential changes in future environments. However, the hypothetical nature of fully-fledged
blockchain-based sharing economy services means there may be discrepancies in knowledge and expec-
tations among different user groups [MTK24].
Trust in transactional exchanges within the sharing economy is a complex issue that requires a
nuanced understanding of both theoretical constructs and practical applications. Research on trust in
the sharing economy helps bridge the gap between these concepts, providing valuable insights into how
trust can be built and maintained in such exchanges [POB22]. This research is crucial for identifying
differences between trust in relational and transactional exchanges, which can inform better practices
and policies for sharing economy platforms.
In summary, trust and safety are paramount in the sharing economy, necessitating robust mech-
anisms for verification, regulation, and transparency. The dual role of consumers, the shift of re-
sponsibilities, and the potential for market failures all contribute to the complexity of these issues.
By understanding and addressing these challenges, sharing economy platforms can create a safer and
more trustworthy environment for all participants.

5.2.2 Privacy Concerns

Privacy concerns are a significant social drawback in the context of the sharing economy. The peer-
to-peer nature of transactions in this economy often necessitates the exchange of personal information
between users, which can lead to various privacy issues. For instance, platforms like Airbnb and Uber
require users to share personal details such as their home address, phone number, and sometimes even
financial information. This exchange of sensitive data increases the risk of privacy breaches and misuse
of information.

23
 Moreover, the sharing economy’s reliance on digital platforms means that vast amounts of user
data are collected, stored, and potentially shared with third parties. This data can include not only
personal identification information but also behavioral data, such as travel patterns and consumer
preferences. The aggregation and analysis of such data can lead to profiling and targeted advertising,
which many users find intrusive [HG23]. Additionally, the lack of stringent data protection regulations
in some regions exacerbates these privacy concerns, leaving users vulnerable to data exploitation.
The microbusiness nature of the sharing economy further complicates privacy issues. The blurred
line between personal and professional activities means that individuals often use their personal de-
vices and accounts for business transactions. This overlap can lead to inadvertent data leaks and
unauthorized access to personal information [Paw18]. For example, hosts on Airbnb might use their
personal email accounts to communicate with guests, increasing the risk of phishing attacks and other
cyber threats.
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s emphasis on trust and community building can sometimes
pressure users into sharing more information than they are comfortable with. Reviews and ratings
systems, which are integral to platforms like Uber and Airbnb, often require users to disclose personal
experiences and opinions publicly. This transparency, while beneficial for building trust, can also lead
to privacy invasions if sensitive information is shared [Har+24].
Another critical aspect of privacy concerns in the sharing economy is the potential for discrimination
based on personal data. Studies have shown that certain demographic groups, such as male Afro-
American hosts on Airbnb, earn less rent than their counterparts for similar properties. This disparity
suggests that personal information can be used to discriminate against users, further highlighting the
privacy risks associated with the sharing economy [FS17].
In summary, privacy concerns in the sharing economy stem from the extensive exchange and col-
lection of personal data, the overlap between personal and professional activities, and the potential
for discrimination based on personal information. These issues underscore the need for robust data
protection measures and clear regulatory frameworks to safeguard user privacy in the sharing economy
[HG23; FS17; Paw18].

5.2.3 Exploitation Risks

Exploitation risks in the sharing economy are a significant concern, particularly in terms of social
drawbacks. One of the primary issues is the potential for unequal power dynamics between users and
providers. For instance, trust is a crucial element in sharing economy transactions, and when trust is
low, the likelihood of exploitation increases. This is because the sanctions for irresponsible sharing are
often weak, making it easier for one party to take advantage of the other [Sha+22].
Moreover, the sharing economy can exacerbate existing social inequalities. Vulnerable populations,
such as those affected by wildfires, may face additional challenges in accessing sharing economy services.
These groups often lack the resources or knowledge to fully benefit from these platforms, leading to
further marginalization [WBS20]. This inequity is compounded by the fact that many sharing economy
platforms are not designed with these populations in mind, limiting their ability to participate and
benefit equally.
Another significant risk is the potential for economic exploitation. The sharing economy often
operates in a regulatory grey area, which can lead to unfair labor practices. For example, workers in
the gig economy, a subset of the sharing economy, often lack the protections and benefits afforded to
traditional employees. This can result in precarious working conditions and financial instability for
those who rely on these platforms for their livelihood [KL19].
Additionally, the sharing economy can negatively impact local communities. The influx of short-
term rentals, such as those offered by home-sharing platforms, can lead to increased rents and reduced
availability of long-term housing. This can displace long-term residents and disrupt community cohe-
sion, leading to social tensions and a decrease in the quality of life for neighborhood residents [MBJ23].
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s reliance on digital platforms can lead to data privacy concerns.
Users are often required to share personal information, which can be exploited by malicious actors.
The extensive use of the internet in the sharing economy can also exacerbate these problems, as it
increases the potential for data breaches and misuse of personal information [Har+24].
In summary, while the sharing economy offers numerous benefits, it also presents significant ex-
ploitation risks. These risks include unequal power dynamics, exacerbation of social inequalities,

24
economic exploitation, negative impacts on local communities, and data privacy concerns. Address-
ing these issues requires careful consideration and regulation to ensure that the sharing economy can
operate fairly and equitably for all participants [BM17; FS17; Sad+23; Jin+23].

5.3 Environmental Drawbacks

5.3.1 Overconsumption
Overconsumption is a significant environmental drawback associated with the sharing economy. While
the sharing economy is often lauded for its potential to reduce waste and promote sustainable consump-
tion, it can paradoxically lead to increased consumption in certain contexts. For instance, ridesharing
platforms, which were initially intended to reduce the need for private car ownership, have in some
cases incentivized individuals to purchase new vehicles to participate in these platforms. This in-
crease in vehicle ownership contributes to higher levels of air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions,
counteracting the environmental benefits that the sharing economy aims to achieve [MBJ23].
Moreover, the sharing economy can lead to a phenomenon where the ease of access to shared
goods and services encourages more frequent use, thereby increasing overall consumption. This is
particularly evident in the case of shared accommodation platforms, where the availability of affordable
lodging options can lead to an increase in travel frequency. As a result, the environmental impact of
increased travel, such as higher carbon emissions from transportation, can outweigh the benefits of
shared accommodation.
The concept of overconsumption in the sharing economy is also linked to the broader economic
implications of turning consumer goods into capital assets. According to [FS17], valuable consumer
goods are often concentrated among a small group of affluent individuals, leading to a scenario where
these goods are used more intensively. This increased utilization can result in faster wear and tear,
necessitating more frequent replacements and thus contributing to overconsumption.
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s emphasis on maximizing the use of idle resources can sometimes
lead to unintended consequences. For example, while sharing vehicles can improve energy efficiency
by reducing the number of cars on the road, it can also lead to increased demand for transportation
services. This heightened demand can strain existing infrastructure and resources, ultimately leading
to higher overall energy consumption [Jin+23].
In addition, the sharing economy’s business models often rely on digital platforms that facilitate the
exchange of goods and services. These platforms can create a culture of convenience and immediacy,
where consumers are encouraged to make impulsive decisions. This behavior can drive overconsump-
tion, as individuals may be more likely to engage in unnecessary transactions simply because the
process is quick and easy.
The sharing economy’s potential to contribute to overconsumption is further complicated by the
lack of clear definitions and boundaries within the field. As noted by [KL19], the sharing economy
encompasses a wide range of activities and business models, making it challenging to assess its overall
impact on consumption patterns. This ambiguity can lead to situations where the environmental bene-
fits of sharing are overstated, while the negative consequences of increased consumption are overlooked.
To address the issue of overconsumption in the sharing economy, it is essential to develop more
nuanced and granular business models that prioritize sustainability. According to [CM20], incorpo-
rating sustainable consumption practices into sharing economy business models can help mitigate the
environmental drawbacks associated with overconsumption. This approach requires a comprehensive
understanding of the factors that drive consumer behavior in the sharing economy and the development
of strategies to promote responsible consumption.
In summary, while the sharing economy has the potential to reduce waste and promote sustainable
consumption, it can also lead to overconsumption in certain contexts. The increased accessibility and
convenience of shared goods and services can drive higher levels of consumption, ultimately negating the
environmental benefits of sharing. To mitigate these effects, it is crucial to develop sustainable business
models that encourage responsible consumption and address the underlying drivers of overconsumption
in the sharing economy [MBJ23; CM20; KL19].

25
5.3.2 Environmental Degradation
Environmental degradation is a significant drawback associated with the sharing economy. The rapid
expansion of sharing economy activities has led to increased waste management challenges and pollution
in urban areas. This is primarily due to the heightened activity of sharing economy platforms, which
contribute to environmental stress through increased consumption and disposal of goods [MBJ23]. The
sharing economy, while promoting resource efficiency, also inadvertently encourages higher turnover
rates of products, leading to more waste generation and pollution.
Moreover, the sharing economy’s reliance on digital platforms and ICT infrastructure has its own
environmental footprint. The energy consumption associated with maintaining these digital platforms
and the production of ICT devices contributes to environmental degradation. The digitalization of
sharing activities, although efficient in many respects, still requires substantial energy and resources,
which can offset some of the environmental benefits touted by the sharing economy [PH21].
The environmental impacts of the sharing economy are further complicated by the motivations
and behaviors of its participants. While some users are driven by environmental concerns, others are
motivated by economic benefits, which can lead to increased consumption and, consequently, more
waste and pollution. This dichotomy in user motivations highlights the complexity of the sharing
economy’s environmental impact [BM17].
Additionally, the sharing economy’s potential to enhance sustainable development goals (SDGs) is
often counterbalanced by its environmental drawbacks. While it promotes social and economic bene-
fits, such as poverty eradication and employment opportunities, these gains can be undermined by the
environmental costs associated with increased production and consumption cycles. The sharing econ-
omy’s contribution to SDGs must therefore be critically evaluated in the context of its environmental
impact.
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s influence on innovative culture and sustainable development is
not without limitations. The environmental benefits are often overshadowed by the practical challenges
of implementing sustainable practices within the sharing economy framework. Future research must
address these limitations to create more practical and environmentally sustainable models for the
sharing economy [Sad+23].
In summary, while the sharing economy offers numerous social and economic benefits, its environ-
mental drawbacks cannot be ignored. The increased waste management issues, pollution, and energy
consumption associated with digital platforms highlight the need for a more balanced approach to lever-
aging the sharing economy for sustainable development. Addressing these environmental challenges
is crucial for realizing the full potential of the sharing economy in contributing to a more sustainable
future [Jim+24; FS17; Sad+23; Jin+23].

5.3.3 Sustainability Challenges

Sustainability challenges in the sharing economy are multifaceted and complex, often presenting sig-
nificant obstacles to achieving long-term environmental goals. One of the primary issues is the tension
between scalability and sustainability. As sharing economy models expand, they often encounter dif-
ficulties in maintaining sustainable practices. This is due to the increased coordination required to
manage larger networks of users and resources, which can lead to inefficiencies and higher environmen-
tal costs.
Moreover, the sharing economy’s potential to foster surplus consumption is another critical chal-
lenge. While the model promotes the reuse and sharing of resources, it can inadvertently encourage
overuse and waste. This paradox arises because the ease of access to shared goods can lead to higher
consumption rates, negating the environmental benefits initially intended. For instance, platforms like
Airbnb and Uber, which are often cited as exemplars of the sharing economy, have been associated
with increased ecological footprints due to higher travel and accommodation demands [Har+24].
Additionally, the sharing economy’s impact on other industries can lead to unintended environmen-
tal consequences. As traditional businesses adapt to compete with sharing economy platforms, they
may adopt practices that are not environmentally sustainable. This competitive pressure can result in
a race to the bottom, where cost-cutting measures take precedence over sustainable practices.
The scalability of sharing economy models also poses significant challenges. As these models grow,
the initial environmental benefits can diminish. This is because larger operations require more re-
sources for coordination and management, which can offset the gains from resource sharing and reuse.

26
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s reliance on digital platforms and technology can lead to increased
energy consumption and electronic waste, further complicating sustainability efforts [CM20].
Another critical issue is the social dimension of sustainability. The sharing economy often blurs
the lines between providers and users, creating configurations that emphasize social interactions and
community building. However, this can also lead to exploitation and inequitable outcomes, particu-
larly for vulnerable groups. For example, older adults, individuals with disabilities, and low-income
communities may face significant barriers to participating in the sharing economy, limiting its potential
to deliver equitable and sustainable benefits [WBS20].
The sharing economy’s business models also present challenges to sustainability. The dichotomy
between alternative-movement and business-like models creates a struggle for balance. While some
configurations aim to promote sustainable practices and community benefits, others prioritize prof-
itability and scalability, often at the expense of environmental goals [Obe23]. This tension highlights
the need for a more nuanced approach to developing and implementing sharing economy models that
can balance economic, social, and environmental objectives.
Furthermore, the environmental benefits of the sharing economy are not always straightforward.
While the model can reduce the need for new goods production and promote resource efficiency,
it can also lead to increased consumption and waste. This is particularly evident in product-based
configurations, where the focus on cheap or free access can drive higher usage rates and shorter product
lifespans [Obe24].
In summary, the sustainability challenges of the sharing economy are deeply intertwined with its
operational and business models. Addressing these challenges requires a comprehensive understanding
of the trade-offs between scalability, coordination, and sustainability. It also necessitates a critical
examination of how sharing economy practices impact consumption patterns, resource use, and social
equity. Only through such a holistic approach can the sharing economy truly contribute to sustainable
development goals [Zha+23; KL19; Sad+23].

6 Business Models in the Sharing Economy

6.1 Peer-to-Peer (P2P)
Peer-to-Peer (P2P) sharing models have emerged as a significant component of the sharing economy,
characterized by direct exchanges between individuals without the need for intermediaries. This model
leverages technology to facilitate the sharing of resources, services, and goods among peers, thereby
creating a decentralized network of users.
One of the primary benefits of P2P sharing is its potential to enhance resource efficiency and reduce
waste. By enabling individuals to share underutilized assets, P2P platforms can contribute to a more
sustainable economy. For instance, the sharing of transportation and accommodation services can lead
to a reduction in the overall consumption of resources and stimulate economic activity, which in turn
supports sustainable economic development [Zha+23].
However, the success of P2P sharing is not solely dependent on its technical advantages. The
acceptance and adoption of P2P platforms by users are critical factors. User acceptance can vary sig-
nificantly depending on the implementation model, whether it is a public or private blockchain system,
and the predictors for each can differ [MTK24]. This highlights the importance of understanding the
user perspective and the factors that influence their willingness to participate in P2P sharing.
Trust is a significant barrier to the adoption of P2P sharing. The lack of trust can lead to the
rejection of both consuming and providing services on P2P platforms. This barrier is particularly
pronounced in P2P sharing compared to traditional business-to-consumer (B2C) models, where estab-
lished brands and companies often provide a sense of security and reliability. Overcoming this trust
barrier is essential for the long-term success of P2P sharing platforms.
Moreover, the habit of purchasing products or renting them from familiar sources, such as family
and friends, remains dominant for many individuals. P2P sharing, being relatively new and more
prevalent in urban environments, requires a shift in consumer behavior. The usage barrier, which
includes the unfamiliarity and perceived complexity of using P2P platforms, can also lead to the
rejection of P2P consuming [HG23].
The roles and influences of different stakeholders in the P2P sharing economy are complex and mul-
tifaceted. Designers, for instance, play a crucial role in creating user-friendly interfaces and systems

27
that can facilitate smoother interactions between peers. However, their potential contributions are
often overlooked, which can hinder the overall effectiveness of P2P platforms. Understanding the dy-
namics between various stakeholders and their impact on the system is essential for designing effective
P2P sharing models.
Furthermore, the sharing economy, including P2P models, has significantly transformed service
markets, particularly in sectors like tourism and transportation. While the benefits of the sharing
economy, such as increased access to resources and economic stimulation, are well-documented, there
are also notable drawbacks. These include regulatory challenges, issues related to trust and security,
and the potential for negative impacts on traditional businesses and local communities [Paw18].
In conclusion, the P2P sharing model within the sharing economy presents both opportunities and
challenges. Its success hinges on addressing barriers such as trust and usage, understanding the roles
of various stakeholders, and balancing the benefits with potential drawbacks. Future research should
continue to explore these aspects to develop more effective and sustainable P2P sharing platforms
[SDB18].

6.2 Business-to-Consumer (B2C)

Business-to-Consumer (B2C) models in the sharing economy represent a significant shift in how goods
and services are accessed and consumed. These models facilitate direct interactions between businesses
and consumers, often leveraging digital platforms to streamline transactions and enhance user experi-
ence. The sharing economy, characterized by the temporary access to goods and services rather than
ownership, has introduced new dynamics into traditional B2C interactions.
One of the primary benefits of B2C models in the sharing economy is the promotion of sustainable
consumption. By enabling the sharing of resources, these models reduce the need for individual
ownership, which in turn can lead to a decrease in the production of goods and a reduction in waste.
This aligns with the broader goals of sustainable development, as it encourages more efficient use of
resources and minimizes environmental impact. Additionally, the sharing economy can democratize
access to goods and services, providing opportunities for individuals who might not otherwise afford
them. This can contribute to a more equitable distribution of resources and support long-term economic
development [Jin+23].
However, the B2C sharing economy is not without its drawbacks. One significant challenge is
the lack of a coherent and universally accepted definition of the sharing economy, which can lead to
inconsistent application and understanding of B2C models. This definitional ambiguity can result
in conflicting research findings and hinder the development of standardized business model patterns.
Furthermore, the rapid growth of the sharing economy has outpaced regulatory frameworks, leading to
potential issues related to consumer protection, data privacy, and labor rights. These regulatory gaps
can create uncertainties for both businesses and consumers, potentially undermining trust in sharing
platforms [CM20].
The role of technology in B2C sharing economy models cannot be overstated. Digitalization has
revolutionized the way goods and services are shared, making it easier for consumers to compare offers,
coordinate transactions, and build trust through algorithms and user reviews. This technological
advancement has made the sharing economy more accessible and efficient, but it also raises concerns
about data security and the digital divide. Not all consumers have equal access to the technology
required to participate in the sharing economy, which can exacerbate existing inequalities [NWL23].
Moreover, the motivations for participating in the sharing economy can vary significantly among
different socio-demographic groups. For some, the primary motivation may be economic, such as saving
money or earning additional income. For others, social and environmental factors may play a more
significant role, such as the desire to reduce waste or support community initiatives. Understanding
these diverse motivations is crucial for businesses to tailor their offerings and marketing strategies
effectively [BM17].
In terms of business model innovation, B2C sharing economy platforms must continuously adapt
to changing consumer preferences and market conditions. This requires a deep understanding of
business model attributes that support successful implementation, such as scalability, flexibility, and
user engagement. By identifying and replicating successful business model patterns, companies can
enhance their competitiveness and sustainability in the sharing economy [Cur21].
In summary, B2C models in the sharing economy offer numerous benefits, including promoting
sustainable consumption and democratizing access to goods and services. However, they also face

28
significant challenges, such as definitional ambiguity, regulatory gaps, and technological disparities.
Understanding the diverse motivations of consumers and continuously innovating business models are
essential for the success and sustainability of B2C sharing economy platforms.

6.3 Hybrid Models

Hybrid models in the sharing economy represent a fusion of traditional business models with innovative
sharing mechanisms. These models aim to leverage the strengths of both approaches to create more
resilient and adaptable business structures. The integration of hybrid models is particularly significant
in the context of the sharing economy, where the dynamic nature of business models necessitates a
flexible and comprehensive approach to capture their full potential.
One of the primary benefits of hybrid models is their ability to address the limitations of static
business models. Traditional business models often fail to account for the evolving nature of market
demands and technological advancements. By incorporating elements of the sharing economy, hybrid
models can adapt to changes more effectively, ensuring sustained relevance and competitiveness. This
adaptability is crucial in a landscape where consumer preferences and technological capabilities are
continually shifting.
Moreover, hybrid models facilitate a more integrative analysis of the sharing economy. The KCERN
Sharing Economy Cube Model, for instance, provides a framework that encompasses diverse and pre-
existing definitions of the sharing economy. This model allows for a fundamental and integrative
analysis, enabling businesses to categorize and explain new forms of sharing economy activities as they
arise [KL19]. Such a comprehensive approach is essential for understanding the expansion and impact
of the sharing economy on various sectors.
The motivations for participation in the sharing economy also play a critical role in shaping hybrid
models. Research indicates that motivations can vary significantly across different sectors, such as
car sharing, ride sharing, accommodation sharing, tool sharing, and meal sharing [BM17]. By under-
standing these motivations, businesses can tailor their hybrid models to better meet the needs and
preferences of their target audiences, thereby enhancing user engagement and satisfaction.
However, the implementation of hybrid models is not without its challenges. One significant draw-
back is the complexity involved in managing and integrating multiple business components. This
complexity can lead to increased operational costs and require sophisticated management strategies
to ensure seamless integration and functionality [Cur21]. Additionally, the dynamic nature of hybrid
models necessitates continuous monitoring and adaptation, which can be resource-intensive.
Trust is another critical factor in the success of hybrid models in the sharing economy. Trust
constructs in the sharing economy involve multiple actors, including users, providers, and platforms.
Ensuring trust among all these actors is essential for the smooth functioning of hybrid models [POB22].
Effective communication mechanisms, both high-tech (e.g., social media) and low-tech (e.g., face-to-
face interactions), are necessary to build and maintain this trust [WBS20]. Strong communication
strategies can enhance transparency and reliability, which are crucial for fostering trust and encouraging
participation in the sharing economy.
Furthermore, hybrid models can contribute to the sustainability of the sharing economy. By pri-
oritizing reduced resource extraction and greenhouse gas emissions, hybrid models can align with
sustainability goals while also enhancing social interaction. This alignment is particularly important
as businesses increasingly seek to capitalize on sustainability trends. Hybrid models that incorporate
sustainability preconditions can help platforms reflect on the contexts and conditions that may improve
the sustainability of their offerings [CM20].
In summary, hybrid models in the sharing economy offer a promising approach to integrating tradi-
tional business practices with innovative sharing mechanisms. These models provide the flexibility and
adaptability needed to navigate the dynamic landscape of the sharing economy, while also addressing
key challenges such as complexity, trust, and sustainability. By leveraging the strengths of both tra-
ditional and sharing economy models, businesses can create more resilient and effective strategies for
long-term success.

6.4 Revenue Streams

Revenue streams in the sharing economy are diverse and can significantly influence the sustainability
and scalability of business models. One common revenue model is the transaction fee, where users are

29
charged a one-time fee each time they access a good or service. This model is straightforward and
ensures that the platform earns revenue with each transaction, making it a popular choice for many
sharing economy businesses.
Another prevalent model is the commission-based revenue stream. In this configuration, the plat-
form charges a percentage fee to either the provider or the user, or sometimes both, for facilitating
the transaction. This model is akin to a service fee and is widely used in various sharing economy
platforms, such as ride-sharing and accommodation-sharing services. The commission model aligns
the platform’s revenue with the volume of transactions, incentivizing the platform to increase user
engagement and transaction frequency.
Some sharing economy platforms operate on a volunteer-run basis with no direct revenue streams.
These platforms rely on community contributions and may seek alternative funding sources such as do-
nations, grants, or sponsorships to sustain their operations. This model emphasizes the communal and
altruistic aspects of the sharing economy but may face challenges in scaling and financial sustainability.
The sharing economy also includes innovative revenue models that leverage the unique character-
istics of shared resources. For instance, car-sharing services may unbundle traditional business areas,
such as separating car manufacturing from customer relationship management, to create new rev-
enue opportunities. This unbundling allows for more flexible and targeted revenue strategies, such as
subscription fees for premium services or dynamic pricing based on demand.
Moreover, the sharing economy’s impact on energy efficiency and usage can create additional rev-
enue streams. Platforms that facilitate the efficient use of resources, such as energy trading and
commerce practices, can generate revenue through energy savings and sustainability incentives. These
platforms contribute to economic development by promoting effective energy use and reducing waste
[Zha+23].
The sharing economy’s business models are inherently complex, often acting as multi-sided markets
with multiple user segments and value propositions. A clear framework is necessary to analyze these
complex models and identify viable revenue streams. This framework should consider the various
configurations of resource use, such as co-use, re-use, and pooling of resources, to optimize revenue
generation while maintaining the platform’s value proposition [Cur21].
In the context of product-service systems, the shift from ownership to access has significant impli-
cations for revenue streams. Users are increasingly willing to pay for temporary access to products and
services rather than owning them outright. This shift enables platforms to implement subscription-
based models, where users pay a recurring fee for access to a range of services or products. This
model provides a steady revenue stream and enhances customer retention by offering continuous value
[SDB18].
The sharing economy’s diverse revenue models reflect its adaptability and potential for innovation.
By leveraging transaction fees, commissions, volunteer contributions, and subscription models, sharing
economy platforms can create sustainable and scalable business models that cater to various user needs
and market conditions. These revenue strategies not only support the financial viability of sharing
economy businesses but also contribute to broader economic and environmental goals.

7 Regulatory and Policy Considerations

7.1 Current Regulatory Landscape
The current regulatory landscape of the sharing economy (SE) is characterized by a complex interplay
of policies and regulations that aim to balance innovation with public interest. One significant aspect
of this landscape is the adaptation of policy interventions to different target groups. For instance, men
often exhibit negative attitudes towards dematerialization through sharing, which suggests that gov-
ernance efforts could start by addressing these attitudes. Conversely, for highly educated individuals,
the focus should be on converting positive attitudes into actual behaviors. This targeted approach is
crucial for effectively establishing SE practices.
Legislative changes have also played a pivotal role in shaping the SE. For example, the banning of
Uber Pop in Germany in 2016 illustrates how regulatory actions can directly impact the operations of
SE platforms [Har+24]. Such measures are often responses to broader discussions and public concerns,
indicating a reactive nature of policy-making in this domain.

30
 Transparency and service quality are other critical areas influenced by regulatory mechanisms. Gov-
ernments can enhance transparency on SE platforms through standards and disclosure-based regimes.
These measures help reduce information asymmetry, allowing service providers to make informed deci-
sions about which platforms to join. Additionally, liability regulations, such as Airbnb’s host guarantee,
provide compensation for damages, thereby improving the perceived service quality and trust among
users.
Taxation is another regulatory tool employed by governments to ensure that SE platforms and their
service providers contribute financially in a manner similar to traditional businesses. For instance,
some governments require Airbnb to collect transient occupancy tax from hosts. This not only levels
the playing field but also ensures that SE platforms operate within legal frameworks. Supply-side
incentives and penalties further encourage legal operations and penalize illegal activities.
The growth of the SE has blurred the lines between private and public sectors, leading to new
regulatory challenges. Regulations are sometimes perceived as limitations on property rights, which
can affect real estate prices. This perception underscores the need for a balanced approach that
considers both the benefits and drawbacks of SE regulation [Paw18].
Governance also plays a crucial role in addressing the various challenges posed by the SE. Effective
governance can mitigate risks associated with biased reviews and platform monopolies on system man-
agement. Conflict resolution mechanisms are essential for improving customer support and reducing
perceived risks [MBJ23]. Moreover, urban governance is vital for ensuring sustainable SE practices,
particularly in cities where the establishment of SE needs to be solidified through approaches similar
to circular economy governance [Jim+24].
Institutional qualities of governments significantly impact the growth of digital innovation within
the SE. The regulatory environment can either foster or hinder this growth, depending on how well it
addresses the unique challenges of the SE. This highlights the importance of a nuanced understanding
of regulatory impacts on digital innovation and the SE.
The regulatory landscape of the SE is further complicated by the dynamics of client and en-
trepreneurial politics. In client politics, the costs of a policy are widely distributed, while the benefits
are concentrated among a specific segment of society. Conversely, entrepreneurial politics involves
dispersed benefits and concentrated costs. These political dynamics influence how regulations are
perceived and implemented within the SE [HL20].
In summary, the current regulatory landscape of the SE is multifaceted, involving targeted policy
interventions, legislative changes, transparency measures, taxation, governance, and political dynamics.
Each of these elements plays a crucial role in shaping the SE, highlighting the need for a comprehensive
and adaptive regulatory approach.

7.2 Challenges in Regulation

Challenges in regulation within the sharing economy are multifaceted and stem from the dynamic
and often disruptive nature of this economic model. One of the primary challenges is the need for
municipalities to balance promotion and control of sharing economy operations. Traditional regulatory
mechanisms, such as those rooted in authority forms, allow local governments to either encourage or
restrict these activities, but finding the right balance is complex.
Moreover, the unique characteristics of service innovations within the sharing economy pose ad-
ditional regulatory hurdles. Unlike product innovations, service innovations interact differently with
consumers and providers, necessitating tailored regulatory approaches. The limited application of
adoption barriers in service-oriented settings underscores the need for further research to understand
these interactions better and develop appropriate regulatory frameworks [HG23].
Another significant challenge is the prioritization of governance strategies. Different products and
demographic groups contribute to dematerialization in varied ways. For instance, increased sharing of
clothing can significantly reduce unit consumption, while sharing leisure equipment and tools addresses
the material types used in these products. Engaging older populations can also help redistribute
untapped product stocks. These diverse contributions require nuanced regulatory approaches that can
effectively address the specific needs and impacts of different sectors and demographics [Jim+24].
Customer protection is another critical area where regulatory challenges arise. Governments and
sharing economy platforms must work together to ensure that service providers meet minimum oper-
ating requirements, thereby safeguarding customer safety. This collaboration could involve imposing
standard requirements and mandating liability insurance to protect customers from potential harm.

31
However, the classification of service providers as contractors rather than employees complicates this
issue, as it affects their employment position and the protections they receive.
The development of the sharing economy is also influenced by the regulatory environment. Plat-
forms often follow established patterns inspired by past configurations or competitive business models.
This tendency indicates that the evolution of the sharing economy is closely tied to the regulations in
place. Business model initiators may have varying agendas, with some attempting to reconnect with
early ideals while others focus on maintaining competitiveness [Obe23].
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s externalities, including economic, social, and environmental
impacts, present additional regulatory challenges. These externalities affect various stakeholders, in-
cluding service providers, customers, incumbents, communities, and governments. Addressing these
impacts requires comprehensive regulatory mechanisms that can mitigate negative effects while pro-
moting the positive aspects of the sharing economy [MBJ23].
In summary, the regulatory challenges in the sharing economy are diverse and complex. They
involve balancing promotion and control, addressing the unique characteristics of service innovations,
prioritizing governance strategies, ensuring customer protection, navigating the classification of service
providers, and managing the externalities of the sharing economy. These challenges necessitate a
nuanced and collaborative approach to regulation that can adapt to the evolving nature of the sharing
economy and its diverse impacts on society.

7.3 Policy Recommendations

Policy recommendations for the sharing economy must address both its benefits and drawbacks to
ensure sustainable and equitable growth. One critical aspect is the adoption of sharing economy
principles by business enterprises, particularly in the transportation industry. This approach can
mitigate adverse impacts related to energy consumption, promoting a more sustainable operational
model [Sad+23].
Effective government systems play a pivotal role in fostering the development of the sharing econ-
omy. The association between electoral competitiveness and the growth of the sharing economy is
significantly enhanced in countries with effective governance structures. This suggests that policy
frameworks should prioritize the establishment of robust and depoliticized government systems to
maximize the positive impacts of the sharing economy [HL20].
Local governance also has a crucial role in promoting sustainable sharing economy practices. By
facilitating proactive local governance, dematerialization can be achieved through increased sharing
and reduced household consumption. This approach not only supports sustainability but also aligns
with the goals and needs of local authorities. Collaboration between local governments and academic
institutions can further enhance the effectiveness of these policies by ensuring that they are grounded
in comprehensive data and research [Jim+24].
Regulatory mechanisms are essential to address the externalities associated with the sharing econ-
omy. These externalities, which include economic, social, and environmental impacts, affect various
stakeholders such as service providers, customers, and communities. Governments can employ guiding
mechanisms to direct the operations of sharing economy platforms, ensuring that these operations
align with public interests and sustainability goals. For instance, guiding mechanisms can be tailored
to different actors within the sharing economy, such as platforms, service providers, and customers, to
ensure comprehensive regulatory coverage.
Taxation of sharing economy platforms is another critical policy recommendation. By taxing these
platforms, governments can generate revenue streams that can be used to finance public projects and
maintain facilities. This approach addresses the economic externalities of the sharing economy, which
can undermine the government’s ability to fund public services. Additionally, regulatory mechanisms
such as market entry controls, operational guidelines, and monitoring systems can help manage the
activities of sharing economy platforms, ensuring that they operate within the legal and ethical bound-
aries set by the government [MBJ23].
In summary, policy recommendations for the sharing economy should focus on promoting sus-
tainable practices, enhancing government effectiveness, fostering local governance, and implementing
comprehensive regulatory mechanisms. These measures will help mitigate the adverse impacts of the
sharing economy while maximizing its benefits for all stakeholders involved.

32
8 Technological Innovations
8.1 Role of Digital Platforms
The role of digital platforms in the sharing economy is pivotal, as they serve as the backbone for
facilitating interactions between users and providers. These platforms enable the efficient exchange of
goods and services by leveraging technology to connect individuals who might otherwise never meet.
The advent of the Internet has significantly expanded the scale of stranger sharing, making it more
desirable and accessible [FS17]. This technological innovation has not only enhanced the reach of
sharing economy platforms but also introduced new dynamics in market operations.
Digital platforms in the sharing economy are characterized by their ability to continuously evolve
and adapt their business models. This adaptability is driven by the need to respond to new initiatives
and changes in user behavior, as well as to the actions of competitors [Obe23]. The diversity of business
models within the sharing economy is a testament to the innovative nature of these platforms, which
are constantly reshaped by the interactions between users, providers, and the platforms themselves.
One of the critical aspects of digital platforms is their role in building and maintaining trust among
users. Trust is a fundamental component of the sharing economy, as it involves transactions between
strangers. Platforms implement various mechanisms, such as reputation systems, to foster trust and
ensure the reliability of services. However, these systems often emphasize short-term engagements
and the accumulation of high ratings, which may not necessarily encourage long-term collaborations
[Tôt+22]. This focus on short-term interactions can be a limitation, as it may hinder the development
of more sustainable and enduring relationships between users and providers.
Moreover, digital platforms in the sharing economy must navigate the challenges of market power
and competition. There is a justified concern that these platforms could gradually increase their market
power, similar to the trends observed in search engines, e-intermediaries in travel markets, and social
media platforms [Paw18]. This potential for monopolistic behavior necessitates careful regulation and
oversight to ensure fair competition and prevent the exploitation of users.
The sharing economy also brings about significant social and environmental benefits. By promot-
ing the co-use and re-use of resources, digital platforms contribute to more sustainable consumption
patterns. They enable the efficient utilization of underutilized resources, thereby reducing waste and
promoting environmental sustainability [Obe24]. Additionally, these platforms facilitate social inter-
actions and community building by connecting individuals with similar needs and interests.
However, the sharing economy is not without its drawbacks. One major issue is the distrust that
some participants have towards private companies and drivers, particularly concerning the use of
personal data and the reliability of services. This distrust can be a barrier to the widespread adoption
of sharing economy services, highlighting the need for greater transparency and better communication
from platform operators.
Furthermore, the sharing economy’s reliance on digital platforms raises questions about inclusivity
and accessibility. Not all individuals have equal access to the Internet or the necessary digital literacy
to participate in the sharing economy. This digital divide can exacerbate existing inequalities and limit
the benefits of the sharing economy to a subset of the population [WBS20].
In summary, digital platforms play a crucial role in the sharing economy by enabling efficient
exchanges, fostering trust, and promoting sustainability. However, they also face challenges related
to market power, trust, and inclusivity. Addressing these challenges requires continuous innovation,
effective regulation, and a commitment to transparency and fairness.

8.2 Blockchain and Smart Contracts

Blockchain and smart contracts represent significant technological innovations within the sharing econ-
omy, offering potential solutions to some of its inherent challenges. Blockchain technology, character-
ized by its decentralized and immutable ledger, enhances transparency and security in transactions.
This is particularly relevant in the sharing economy, where trust between participants is crucial. Trust
is often cited as the currency of the sharing economy, and blockchain can provide a robust framework
to ensure that transactions are secure and verifiable [Aki+21; POB22].
Smart contracts, which are self-executing contracts with the terms of the agreement directly written
into code, further augment the capabilities of blockchain. These contracts automatically enforce and

33
execute the terms of an agreement when predefined conditions are met, reducing the need for interme-
diaries and thereby lowering transaction costs. This automation can streamline operations within the
sharing economy, making processes more efficient and reliable.
The integration of blockchain and smart contracts into the sharing economy can also address issues
related to data integrity and user privacy. By leveraging blockchain’s decentralized nature, data can
be stored in a manner that is resistant to tampering and unauthorized access. This ensures that user
information is secure, fostering greater trust among participants [MTK24; Aki+21].
Moreover, the use of blockchain and smart contracts can facilitate the creation of decentralized plat-
forms, where users can interact directly without the need for a central authority. This decentralization
can democratize access to resources and services, empowering users and reducing the dominance of
large, centralized platforms. It also aligns with the principles of the sharing economy, which emphasizes
peer-to-peer interactions and the efficient use of resources [BM17; Jin+23].
However, the implementation of blockchain and smart contracts in the sharing economy is not
without challenges. One significant hurdle is the scalability of blockchain networks. As the number
of transactions increases, the network can become congested, leading to slower transaction times and
higher costs. This issue needs to be addressed to ensure that blockchain can support the high volume
of transactions typical in the sharing economy [MTK24].
Another challenge is the regulatory environment. The legal status of smart contracts and blockchain
transactions varies across jurisdictions, creating uncertainty for users and developers. Clear and con-
sistent regulations are necessary to provide a stable framework for the adoption of these technologies
[SB20].
Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of blockchain and smart contracts in the sharing
economy are substantial. They can enhance trust, reduce costs, and improve efficiency, making the
sharing economy more sustainable and accessible. As these technologies continue to evolve, they are
likely to play an increasingly important role in shaping the future of the sharing economy [MTK24;
Aki+21; BM17; Jin+23].

8.3 Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Data Analytics are pivotal in transforming the sharing economy by
enhancing efficiency, personalization, and security. AI algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data to
predict user behavior, optimize resource allocation, and improve user experiences. For instance, AI-
driven platforms can match supply and demand more accurately, reducing idle resources and increasing
utilization rates. This optimization is crucial for platforms like ride-sharing and accommodation ser-
vices, where matching users with the right service at the right time is essential for operational efficiency.
Data analytics, on the other hand, provides insights into user preferences and market trends,
enabling companies to tailor their offerings more precisely. By analyzing user data, companies can
identify patterns and trends that inform strategic decisions, such as pricing strategies and service
improvements. This data-driven approach not only enhances user satisfaction but also drives innovation
by identifying unmet needs and emerging opportunities in the market.
Moreover, AI and data analytics contribute to user empowerment by providing transparency and
control over personal data. Blockchain technology, integrated with AI, can offer decentralized platforms
where users have ownership of their data and can decide how it is shared and used [MTK24]. This
empowerment is a significant factor in user acceptance and trust in the sharing economy, as it addresses
concerns about data privacy and security.
However, the integration of AI and data analytics in the sharing economy also presents challenges.
One major concern is the potential for biased algorithms, which can lead to unfair treatment of
users. Ensuring that AI systems are transparent and accountable is crucial to mitigate these risks.
Additionally, the reliance on data analytics raises issues related to data ownership and the ethical use of
data. Companies must navigate these challenges by implementing robust data governance frameworks
and adhering to ethical standards in AI development and deployment [Paw18].
Furthermore, the rapid advancement of AI and data analytics necessitates continuous adaptation
and learning. Companies must invest in research and development to stay ahead of technological trends
and maintain a competitive edge. This investment not only drives innovation but also fosters a culture
of creativity and problem-solving within organizations [Sad+23]. By leveraging AI and data analytics,
companies can enhance their operational capabilities and contribute to the sustainable growth of the
sharing economy.

34
 In summary, AI and data analytics are integral to the evolution of the sharing economy, offering
numerous benefits such as improved efficiency, personalized services, and enhanced user empowerment.
However, these technologies also pose challenges that require careful management to ensure ethical
and fair use. By addressing these challenges and harnessing the potential of AI and data analytics,
companies can drive innovation and achieve sustainable growth in the sharing economy [MTK24;
Har+24; FS17; Sad+23].

9 Future Trends and Directions

9.1 Emerging Markets
Emerging markets present a unique landscape for the implementation and growth of the sharing econ-
omy. These markets, characterized by rapid economic development and increasing integration into the
global economy, offer both opportunities and challenges for the sharing economy model.
One of the primary benefits of the sharing economy in emerging markets is its potential to drive
sustainable economic development. The sharing economy can optimize the use of resources, thereby
reducing waste and promoting efficiency. For instance, the efficient use of energy resources is crucial
for sustainable development, and the sharing economy can play a significant role in this regard. By
redistributing goods and services where they are most needed, the sharing economy can help balance
supply and demand more effectively, leading to better resource utilization [KL19]. This is particularly
important in emerging markets where resources may be scarce and the need for efficient distribution
is critical.
Moreover, the sharing economy can contribute to economic growth by creating new income op-
portunities and fostering entrepreneurship. In Vietnam, for example, the economic income saw a
significant increase, and the country improved its global economic ranking within a short period. This
growth can be partly attributed to the adoption of innovative business models, including those based
on the sharing economy. By providing platforms for individuals to offer goods and services, the shar-
ing economy can stimulate local economies and create jobs, which is essential for the overall economic
development of emerging markets.
However, the implementation of the sharing economy in emerging markets is not without its chal-
lenges. One significant hurdle is the regulatory environment. There is often a lack of comprehensive
frameworks to regulate the sharing economy, which can lead to issues such as unfair competition and
exploitation of workers [MBJ23]. Governments in emerging markets need to develop and enforce reg-
ulations that protect both consumers and service providers while promoting fair competition. This
regulatory oversight is crucial to ensure that the benefits of the sharing economy are realized without
compromising the welfare of the participants.
Another challenge is the digital divide. The sharing economy heavily relies on digital platforms and
technologies, which may not be accessible to everyone in emerging markets. This digital divide can
limit the participation of certain segments of the population, thereby reducing the overall impact of
the sharing economy. Efforts to bridge this gap, such as improving internet access and digital literacy,
are essential to ensure inclusive growth [MTK24].
Despite these challenges, the potential of the sharing economy in emerging markets remains signif-
icant. The rapid spread of sharing economy models, such as accommodation sharing and ride-sharing,
demonstrates the adaptability and appeal of these models in diverse economic contexts [BM17]. The
sharing economy can also contribute to energy efficiency, which is a critical aspect of sustainable de-
velopment. By reducing energy consumption without compromising economic growth, the sharing
economy can help emerging markets achieve their sustainability goals [Sad+23].
Furthermore, the sharing economy can support the development of infrastructure and technology
in emerging markets. As these markets continue to grow, there is a need for robust infrastructure to
support economic activities. The sharing economy can facilitate the efficient use of existing infrastruc-
ture and promote the development of new technologies that enhance productivity and sustainability
[Jin+23]. This, in turn, can create a more conducive environment for economic growth and develop-
ment.
In summary, emerging markets offer a fertile ground for the growth of the sharing economy, with
significant potential benefits in terms of resource efficiency, economic growth, and sustainability. How-
ever, addressing challenges such as regulatory frameworks and the digital divide is crucial to fully

35
realize these benefits. By leveraging the strengths of the sharing economy and addressing its chal-
lenges, emerging markets can pave the way for a more sustainable and inclusive economic future.

9.2 Technological Advancements

Technological advancements have significantly shaped the landscape of the sharing economy, driving its
evolution and expanding its potential. The integration of information and communication technology
(ICT) has been pivotal in enhancing the efficiency and coordination of sharing activities. ICT-enabled
platforms have facilitated the emergence of new sharing patterns and practices that bridge the gap
between traditional sharing and the formal market economy [PH21]. These platforms have introduced
a variety of shared resources and varying levels of formality in sharing practices, thereby broadening
the scope and reach of the sharing economy.
The on-demand economy, exemplified by services such as Uber and Airbnb, leverages mobile net-
works to provide customized services to consumers. This model of service delivery underscores the
importance of technological infrastructure in enabling seamless and efficient transactions between ser-
vice providers and users [KL19]. The ability to connect directly with clients without intermediaries, as
reported by providers, highlights the role of technology in streamlining operations and reducing costs
associated with traditional business models [Tôt+22].
Moreover, the sharing economy has demonstrated its potential in addressing logistical challenges,
particularly in disaster contexts. The inclusion of sharing economy mechanisms in disaster management
can provide access to critical resources and services that are often limited during such events. This
underscores the need for further research to explore the roles and impacts of the sharing economy
in disaster response and management. The advancements in ICT envision a future where disaster
response is more effective and efficient, leveraging the capabilities of the sharing economy [SB20].
However, the adoption of new technologies within the sharing economy is not without challenges.
Users may not fully understand certain technological functionalities, or they may not perceive them as
essential. Additionally, concerns about data transparency and privacy can pose psychological barriers
to the adoption of technologies such as blockchain [MTK24]. These concerns need to be addressed to
ensure the smooth integration of advanced technologies in the sharing economy.
The sharing economy also plays a crucial role in promoting sustainable economic development. The
use of efficient technologies and skilled human resources can reduce energy consumption while main-
taining productivity. This positive relationship between sharing economy users, value, and sustainable
development highlights the potential of the sharing economy to contribute to broader economic and
environmental goals [Zha+23].
In summary, technological advancements are central to the growth and evolution of the sharing
economy. They enhance efficiency, expand the scope of sharing practices, and address logistical chal-
lenges, particularly in disaster contexts. However, the successful integration of these technologies
requires addressing user concerns and ensuring transparency and privacy. The sharing economy’s con-
tribution to sustainable development further underscores the importance of continued technological
innovation in this sector.

9.3 Evolving Consumer Preferences

Evolving consumer preferences in the sharing economy are shaped by a variety of factors, including
economic motivations, social dynamics, and environmental considerations. Users of sharing economy
platforms often exhibit higher economic motivations compared to providers, who may prioritize ideal-
istic or practical motivations depending on the context [Jim+24; BM17]. This distinction highlights
the nuanced nature of consumer behavior within the sharing economy.
The shift from non-market to market-driven logic in the sharing economy has significant implica-
tions for consumer preferences. Initially, sharing economy activities were driven by altruistic motives,
but over time, they have increasingly become profit-oriented ventures. This transition has led to con-
cerns about sustainability, as the focus on profitability may undermine the original goals of resource
efficiency and environmental stewardship.
Moreover, the sharing economy has facilitated changes in the relationship between consumers and
products. The willingness to pay for temporary ownership rather than permanent possession reflects
a shift in property rights and responsibility [SDB18]. This change is indicative of a broader trend
towards valuing access over ownership, which aligns with the principles of the sharing economy.

36
 The COVID-19 pandemic has also influenced consumer preferences in the sharing economy. In-
creased concerns about contamination and changes in consumption patterns have affected the types
of products shared and the frequency of sharing activities. For instance, there was a notable increase
in the purchase of leisure items, furniture, and decoration, while the consumption of clothes decreased
during the pandemic [Jim+24].
Additionally, the sharing economy has been associated with various economic benefits, such as
improved productivity, reduced energy use, and enhanced living standards [Jin+23]. These bene-
fits contribute to the appeal of sharing economy platforms for consumers seeking cost-effective and
sustainable alternatives to traditional consumption models.
However, the expansion of the sharing economy has not been without challenges. The tension
between sustainability and scalability is a critical issue, as the growth of sharing economy platforms
can lead to the exploitation of individuals at lower socioeconomic levels and environmental degradation
[Obe24]. This tension underscores the need for careful consideration of the long-term impacts of the
sharing economy on both society and the environment.
In summary, evolving consumer preferences in the sharing economy are influenced by a complex in-
terplay of economic, social, and environmental factors. The shift towards market-driven logic, changes
in property rights, and the impact of external events like the COVID-19 pandemic all play a role in
shaping these preferences. As the sharing economy continues to grow, it is essential to address the
challenges associated with sustainability and scalability to ensure that its benefits are realized without
compromising its original goals.

10 Conclusion
The sharing economy represents a transformative force with the potential to reshape economic, so-
cial, and environmental landscapes. By leveraging digital platforms and innovative technologies, it
facilitates the efficient utilization of underused assets, thereby promoting sustainability and resource
optimization. The economic benefits are evident in the form of lower transaction costs, increased mar-
ket efficiency, and the creation of new income opportunities for individuals. Additionally, the sharing
economy fosters community engagement and social cohesion by enabling peer-to-peer interactions and
collaborative networks.
However, the rapid growth and evolution of the sharing economy also present significant challenges.
Regulatory frameworks often lag behind, leading to issues such as unfair competition, consumer protec-
tion risks, and inconsistent service quality. The reliance on digital platforms raises concerns about data
privacy and security, while the integration of advanced technologies like blockchain and AI requires
substantial investment and technical expertise. Furthermore, the digital divide remains a barrier to
inclusivity, limiting access for some users.
The historical development of the sharing economy highlights its dynamic nature, evolving from
localized, community-based practices to a global phenomenon driven by technological advancements.
This evolution underscores the importance of balancing innovation with regulation to ensure sustain-
able growth. The economic context reveals a complex interplay of benefits and drawbacks, with sectoral
variations influencing the overall impact. While the sharing economy contributes to energy efficiency
and sustainable development, regulatory constraints and regional disparities must be addressed to fully
harness its potential.
Technological enablers such as digital platforms, mobile technology, IoT, and AI are fundamental to
the sharing economy’s functioning and expansion. These technologies enhance efficiency, security, and
user experience, making resource sharing more accessible and convenient. However, they also introduce
challenges related to data privacy, security, and the need for continuous updates and maintenance.
In summary, the sharing economy offers a promising model for sustainable economic development,
but its success depends on addressing the associated challenges through comprehensive research and
policy development. A nuanced understanding of its dynamics, motivations, and impacts is crucial
for creating a fair and sustainable system that maximizes benefits while mitigating risks. As the
sharing economy continues to evolve, ongoing collaboration between stakeholders, policymakers, and
researchers will be essential to navigate its complexities and realize its full potential. The variability
in economic motivations across sectors and the impact of regulatory frameworks must be carefully
considered to fully understand and harness its economic potential.

37
References
[Aki+21] Deniz Akina et al. “Sharing with neighbours: Insights from local practices of the sharing
economy”. In: Technology in Society 64 (Jan. 2021). url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
techsoc.2020.101481.
[Aut15] Unknown Author. “Evaluating Sustainability of Sharing Economy Business Models”. In:
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 213 (Nov. 2015). doi: 10 . 1016 / j . sbspro .
2015.11.486. url: www.sciencedirect.com.
[BM17] Lars Böcker and Toon Meelen. “Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations
for intended sharing economy participation”. In: Environmental Innovation and Societal
Transitions 23 (Jan. 2017). doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.004. url: www.elsevier.
com/locate/eist.
[Che+23] Kuang-Ting Cheng et al. “Signals that sharing economy service providers should send out:
The case of codementor”. In: Asia Pacific Management Review (Dec. 2023). doi: 10.1016/
j.apmrv.2023.12.002. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.12.002.
[CM20] Steven Kane Curtis and Oksana Mont. “Sharing economy business models for sustainabil-
ity”. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 266 (Apr. 2020), p. 121519. doi: 10 . 1016 / j .
jclepro.2020.121519. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121519.
[Cur21] Steven Kane Curtis. “Business model patterns in the sharing economy”. In: Sustainable
Production and Consumption 27 (Apr. 2021). doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.009. url:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.009.
[FS17] Koen Frenken and Juliet Schorb. “Putting the sharing economy into perspective”. In: En-
vironmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 23 (Jan. 2017), pp. 3–10. url: http :
//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003.
[GV21] Miriam Garbarova and Lukas Vartiak. “Consequences of the sharing economy on passenger
transport”. In: Transportation Research Procedia 55 (June 2021). doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.
2021.06.006. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.06.006.
[Har+24] Barbara Hartl et al. “‘One bad apple won’t spoil the bunch’ – Representations of the
“sharing economy””. In: Journal of Business Research 176 (Feb. 2024). url: https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114580.
[HG23] Tin Huynh and Sebastian Gurtner. “Resistance to the sharing economy: Why some con-
sumers and providers do not participate in P2P sharing”. In: Journal of Cleaner Production
422 (Aug. 2023). doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138628. url: https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.jclepro.2023.138628.
[HL20] Sounman Hong and Sanghyun Lee. “Sharing Economy and Government”. In: Journal of
Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 6.4 (Dec. 2020). doi: 10 . 3390 /
joitmc6040177. url: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/joitmc.
[Jim+24] Divia Jimnez Encarnación et al. “Revealing patterns in household product consumption
and sharing: An approach to support urban governance towards a sustainable sharing
economy”. In: Sustainable Production and Consumption 45 (Jan. 2024). url: https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.01.009.
[Jin+23] Hongmei Jin et al. “Role of the sharing economy in the achievement of energy efficiency
and sustainable economic development: Evidence from China”. In: Journal of Innovation
& Knowledge 8 (Jan. 2023), p. 100296. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100296.
[KL19] Yeji Kim and Minhwa Lee. “Typology and Unified Model of the Sharing Economy in
Open Innovation Dynamics”. In: Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and
Complexity 5.4 (Dec. 2019). doi: 10.3390/joitmc5040102. url: https://www.mdpi.
com/journal/joitmc.
[MBJ23] Mohamed Mosaad, Sabine Benoit, and Chanaka Jayawardhena. “The dark side of the
sharing economy: A systematic literature review of externalities and their regulation”. In:
Journal of Business Research 168 (Aug. 2023). url: https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1016 / j .
jbusres.2023.114186.

38
[MTK24] Ikram Nur Muharam, Iis P. Tussyadiaha, and Albert Nsom Kimbua. “Decentralising Airbnb:
Testing the acceptability of blockchain-based sharing economy systems”. In: Tourism Man-
agement 102 (2024).
[NWL23] Michał Nadolny, Ewa Walaszczyk, and Maja Leszczyńska. “Key decision factors in the
shared economy decision-making model”. In: vol. 225. Oct. 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.
2023.10.168. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.168.
[Obe23] Christina Oberg. “Towards a typology of sharing economy business model transformation”.
In: Technovation 123 (Feb. 2023). url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.
2023.102722.
[Obe24] Christina Oberg. “Sharing economy models and sustainability: Towards a typology”. In:
Journal of Cleaner Production 447 (Mar. 2024). doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141636.
url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141636.
[Paw18] Adam Pawlicz. Pros and cons of sharing economy regulation. Implications for sustainable
city logistics. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.06.042.
[PH21] Maria J. Pouri and Lorenz M. Hilty. “The digital sharing economy: A confluence of technical
and social sharing”. In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 38 (Jan. 2021).
url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.12.003.
[POB22] Louise Pelgander, Christina Oberg, and Louise Barken. “Trust and the sharing economy”.
In: Digital Business 2 (Oct. 2022). url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2022.
100048.
[Sad+23] Muhammad Sadiq et al. “Sharing economy benefits and sustainable development goals:
Empirical evidence from the transportation industry of Vietnam”. In: Journal of Innovation
& Knowledge 8 (Jan. 2023). doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100290. url: https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jik.2022.100290.
[SB20] Hamed Seddighi and Hossein Baharmand. “Exploring the role of the sharing economy in
disasters management”. In: Technology in Society 63 (Aug. 2020). url: https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101363.
[SDB18] Laurens Somers, Ivo Dewit, and Chris Baelus. “Understanding product-service systems in
a sharing economy context –A literature review”. In: vol. 73. May 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.
procir.2018.03.317. url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
S2212827118304980.
[Sha+22] Shaul Shalvi et al. “Psychological science for a responsible sharing economy”. In: Current
Opinion in Psychology 44 (Jan. 2022). url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.
08.032.
[Tôt+22] Zsőfia Tôth et al. “Social capital creation on professional sharing economy platforms: The
problems of rating dependency and the non-transferability of social capital”. In: Journal of
Business Research 144 (Feb. 2022). url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.
01.090.
[WBS20] Stephen D. Wonga, Jacquelyn C. Broaderb, and Susan A. Shaheena. “Can Sharing Econ-
omy Platforms Increase Social Equity for Vulnerable Populations in Disaster Response and
Relief? A Case Study of the 2017 and 2018 California Wildfires”. In: Transportation Re-
search Interdisciplinary Perspectives 5 (June 2020). doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100131.
url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198220300427.
[Zha+23] YunQian Zhang et al. “Impact of a sharing economy on sustainable development and en-
ergy efficiency: Evidence from the top ten Asian economies”. In: Journal of Innovation
& Knowledge 8 (Jan. 2023). doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2023.100320. url: https://www.
journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-innovation-and-knowledge.

39