Stipulation
Stipulation
27
28
Case No. 5:24-cv-03811-EKL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case 5:24-cv-03811-EKL Document 291 Filed 01/02/25 Page 2 of 7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 Case No. 5:24-cv-03811-EKL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case 5:24-cv-03811-EKL Document 291 Filed 01/02/25 Page 3 of 7
1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 7-
2 12, by and among Plaintiffs Concord Music Group, Inc., Capitol CMG, Inc., Universal Music
3 Corp., Songs of Universal, Inc., Universal Music – MGB NA LLC, Polygram Publishing, Inc.,
4 Universal Music – Z Tunes LLC, and ABKCO Music, Inc. (collectively, “Publishers”) and
5 Defendant Anthropic PBC (“Anthropic”), by and through their respective counsel of record, as
6 follows:
7 1. On October 18, 2023, Publishers initiated this action by filing a Complaint against
8 Anthropic in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, asserting claims for
10 alteration of copyright management information, in violation of the Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. §§
13 of the exclusive rights to millions of valuable musical compositions, including the 500
14 compositions specifically identified in Exhibit A to the Complaint. See ECF No. 1-3.
15 3. Publishers moved for a preliminary injunction on November 16, 2023, ECF No. 40,
16 alleging irreparable harm. Anthropic then moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or, in
17 the alternative, to transfer venue. ECF No. 54. On June 24, 2024, the Middle District of Tennessee
18 held that it lacked personal jurisdiction, granted Anthropic’s motion in part, and transferred the
19 case to the Northern District of California (Judge Corley), without ruling on the preliminary
20 injunction motion. ECF No. 124. Following transfer, Publishers filed a renewed Motion for
21 Preliminary Injunction on August 1, 2024, ECF No. 179, which Anthropic opposed and which the
22 Parties have now fully briefed, see ECF Nos. 207, 225, 256. The case was reassigned from Judge
23 Corley to this Court on August 21, 2024. ECF No. 206. The Court heard oral argument on the
25 4. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a)
26 because this dispute involves claims brought by Publishers against Anthropic under the Copyright
28
3 Case No. 5:24-cv-03811-EKL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case 5:24-cv-03811-EKL Document 291 Filed 01/02/25 Page 4 of 7
2 that it seeks to prevent infringing outputs of copyrighted content, including Publishers’ works.
3 6. The Parties have reached agreement resolving one aspect of the relief Publishers
4 seek pursuant to their Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 179. To reflect that agreement,
7 AI models and product offerings. With respect to new large language models and new
8 product offerings that are introduced in the future, Anthropic will apply Guardrails on text
9 input and output in a manner consistent with its already-implemented Guardrails. Nothing
11 implementation of such Guardrails, provided that such changes do not materially diminish
13 b. At any time during the pendency of this proceeding, Publishers may notify
14 Anthropic in writing that its Guardrails are not effectively preventing output that
18 those allegations, with which Publishers will cooperate in good faith. Anthropic will
19 ultimately provide a detailed written response identifying when and how Anthropic will
20 address the issue identified in Publishers’ notice, or Anthropic will clearly state its intent
21 not to address the issue. The foregoing procedure is without prejudice to Publishers’ right
24 involving this stipulation, and the Court shall have the authority to enforce this stipulation
1 subject to the entry of this stipulation by the Court, Publishers’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction,
2 ECF No. 179, is denied in part as MOOT with respect to that specific request.
3 8. This stipulation is without prejudice to the Parties’ rights, remedies, and defenses
4 concerning the aspects of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction that are not resolved by this
5 stipulation and any other aspects of the case not directly addressed in this stipulation. In particular,
6 the Parties continue to dispute, and this stipulation does not resolve or affect, Publishers’ request
7 in their Motion for Preliminary Injunction that Anthropic refrain from using unauthorized copies
8 of Publishers’ lyrics to train future AI models. Further, nothing herein, nor any actions or
11 9. This stipulation constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties with
12 respect to the subject matter herein. The Parties expressly agree that this stipulation supersedes all
13 prior negotiations, discussions, agreements, and understandings, whether written or oral, between
14 the Parties.
16
17 Dated: _________________,
January 2 2025
HON. EUMI K. LEE
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5 Case No. 5:24-cv-03811-EKL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case 5:24-cv-03811-EKL Document 291 Filed 01/02/25 Page 6 of 7
28
6 Case No. 5:24-cv-03811-EKL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case 5:24-cv-03811-EKL Document 291 Filed 01/02/25 Page 7 of 7
ATTESTATION
1
2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that all other signatories listed, and on whose
3 behalf this filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.
5
DATED: December 30, 2024 /s/ Joseph R. Wetzel
6 Joseph R. Wetzel
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7 Case No. 5:24-cv-03811-EKL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER