3-Real Analysis (Sequence and Convergence)
3-Real Analysis (Sequence and Convergence)
Shivangi Chandel
1 Sequences in R
1
1/2
1/4
1/8
..
.
Figure: Zeno’s Dichotomy Paradox
S0 =1/2,
S1 =1/2 + 1/4,
....,
Sn =1/2 + 1/4 + ... + 1/2n+1 ,
....
and calculating the ‘limit’ of this sequence which will be nothing but
1/2 + 1/4 + · · · .
I have introduced two new terms in the above method, sequence and
limit. Let us take a closer look at what these terms imply.
1 1 1 1
Consider the sequence {1, , , , ..., n , ...} versus the sequence
2 4 8 2
{1, 2, 3, .., n, ...}.
What is the difference between the two?
The elements in the first sequence get closer and closer to 0 while the
elements in the second sequence keep on increasing indefinitely
(Check for yourself).
The first one is what we call a convergent sequence where as n
becomes larger and larger, the elements in the sequence get closer
and closer to a finite value which is called the limit of that sequence.
lim xn = x, or simply xn −→ x
n−→∞
.
The notation N is used to emphasize that the choice of N depends
on the value of . - it is often convenient to write N instead of N .
In most cases, a “small” value of will usually require a “large” value
of N to guarantee that the distance between xn and x is less than
for all n = N, N + 1, N + 2, · · · .
xn ∈ V (x).
That is, only finitely many elements x1 , · · · , xN−1 lie outside the
−neighbourhood of the limit x, and this holds for every > 0.
Notice that both definitions can only be used to verify that a proposed
value x is indeed the limit. They do not determine what this x will be.
1
Show that lim = 0.
n−→∞ n
Theorem 1.1
A sequence in R can have at most one limit.
Proof.
Suppose not. Suppose that x 0 and x 00 are both limits of {xn }. Then, for each > 0
there exists a N 0 ∈ N such that |xn − x 0 | < /2 for all n ≥ N 0 , and there exists a N 00 ∈ N
such that |xn − x 00 | < /2 for all n ≥ N 00 . Define N = max N 0 , N 00 . Then for all n ≥ N,
we apply the Triangle Inequality to get
Theorem 1.2
A convergent sequence of real numbers is bounded.
Proof.
Suppose that xn −→ x and let = 1. Then, by definition of convergence,
there exists a natural number N such that |xn − x| < 1 for all n ≥ N.
Then for any n ≥ N,
Theorem 1.3
1 Let {xn } and {yn } be sequences of real numbers that converge to x
and y , respectively, and let c ∈ R. Then the sequences {xn + yn },
{xn − yn }, {xn yn }, and {cxn }, converge to x + y , x − y , xy , cx
respectively.
2 If {xn } converges to x and {zn } is a sequence of non-zero real
numbers that converges to z and if z 6= 0, then the quotient sequence
{xn /zn } converges to x/z.
Proof.
Theorem 3.2.3 (pages 61-63) Robert G. Bartle, Donald R. Sherbert
(1999). Introduction to real analysis. Third edition. Wiley, New York.
1 1 1
lim Sn = lim ( + + ... + n+1 )
n−→∞ 2 4 2
n−→∞
1
= lim 1 − n+1 (Why ?)
n−→∞ 2
1
= 1 − lim n+1 (Why ?)
n−→∞ 2
= 1.
Definition 1.3
Let {xn } be a sequence of real numbers. We say that {xn } is increasing if
xn ≤ xn+1 for all n ∈ N. We say that {xn } is decreasing if xn ≥ xn+1 for
all n ∈ N. We say that {xn } is monotone if it is either increasing or
decreasing.
x − < xN ≤ x < x + .
Definition 1.4
Let {xn } be a sequence of real numbers and let n1 < n2 < · · · < nk < · · ·
be a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers. Then the sequence
{xnk } given by
{xn1 , xn2 , · · · , xnk , · · · }
is called a subsequence of {xn }.
Proof.
Let {xn } be a bounded sequence of real numbers. From previous result,
{xn } will have a monotone subsequence {xnk }. Further, {xnk } is bounded
because {xn } is bounded. From Monotone Convergence Theorem, it
follows that the subsequence {xnk } is convergent. Hence proved.
Application of BWT:
The Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem allows one to prove that if the set
of allocations is compact and non-empty, then the system has a
Pareto-efficient allocation.
We will revisit this again once we define compact sets.