Test Series Upsc Geography
Test Series Upsc Geography
For Prelims: National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), Supreme Court,
Right to Education, Khorasan, Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act 2004, Secularism
, The Constitution, Fundamental rights, National Council of Educational Research and Training
(NCERT).
Source: HT
Why in News?
Recently, the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) has submitted
before the Supreme Court that the curriculum imparted in madrasas lacks comprehensiveness and thus
contravenes the mandates of the Right to Education.
The Commission contends that the textbooks utilised in these institutions promulgate teachings
centered on the doctrinal primacy of Islam.
Madrasa
Madrasa, derived from Arabic, refers to an educational institution primarily associated with
Islamic teachings.
In the formative centuries of Islam, mosques functioned as centers of education. However, by
the 10th century, madrasas evolved as distinct institutions, imparting both religious and secular
knowledge across the Islamic world.
The earliest documented evidence of madrasas originates from regions such
as Khorasan and Transoxania, encompassing present-day eastern and northern
Iran, Central Asia, and Afghanistan.
Larger madrasas often provided residential facilities, particularly catering to students from
economically disadvantaged backgrounds.
The Allahabad High Court judgement dated March 2024, declared Uttar Pradesh Board of
Madarsa Education Act, 2004, as “unconstitutional.”
The Court's ruling was based on the premise that the Act contravened “the principle of
secularism” enshrined in the Constitution and violates fundamental rights guaranteed
under Article 14 (right to equality before the law).
The NCPCR made its submission to the Supreme Court in response to a set of appeals
challenging a verdict by the Allahabad High Court.
NCPCR has recommended that all Muslim and non-Muslim children be removed from
Madrasas and enrolled in schools to receive fundamental education as per the RTE
Act, 2009.
Note:
In 2023, approximately 1.69 lakh students appeared for examinations conducted by the Uttar
Pradesh Madrasa Education Board, which are equivalent to the Class 10 and 12 levels in
mainstream education.
Uttar Pradesh, along with several other states, also maintains a separate board for Sanskrit
education, operating parallel to the madrasa system.
The Act aimed to regulate and govern the functioning of madrasas (Islamic educational
institutions) in the state of Uttar Pradesh.
It provided a framework for the establishment, recognition, curriculum, and administration of
madrasas across Uttar Pradesh.
Under this Act, the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education was established to oversee and
supervise the activities of madrasas in the state.
Cultural Preservation: Historically, Madrasas have served to preserve and transmit Islamic
culture, beliefs, and values among Muslim communities in India, fostering a sense of
identity and community.
Education and Literacy: They provide an educational platform for many Muslim children,
particularly in areas where access to formal schooling is limited.
However, concerns exist regarding the quality of education and the comparatively
lower literacy rates among Muslim communities, with many students unable to
progress beyond secondary education.
Influence on Ideology: While Madrasas can promote positive values, some have
been criticized for fostering extremist ideologies and anti-national sentiments, potentially
contributing to social divisions and communal tensions within the country.
Legal and Funding Issues: The existence of Madrasas raises questions about secularism
and equality in education funding.
Critics argue that public funds should not be used to support religious education without
equally funding other religions to ensure uniformity and adherence to secular principles.
Challenges to Integration: Many graduates of Madrasas face difficulties in integrating into the
broader workforce due to a lack of vocational skills and modern education. The educational
approach often leads to isolation from mainstream society, hindering opportunities for
upward mobility and social cohesion.
Way Forward
Prelims:
Which of the following can aid in furthering the Government’s objective of inclusive growth? (2011)
(a) 1 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3
Ans: (d)
Mains
Despite Consistent experience of high growth, India still goes with the lowest indicators of human
development. Examine the issues that make balanced and inclusive development elusive. (2019)
“Education is not an injunction, it is an effective and pervasive tool for all-round development of an
individual and social transformation”. Examine the New Education Policy, 2020 (NEP, 2020) in light of the
above statement. (2020)
For Mains: Effect of global warming and climate change on Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) in tropical
ecosystems, Measures need to halt tropical ecosystem degradation.
Source: DTE
Why in News?
Recently, a study has shown that key biodiversity areas (KBAs) in tropical forests have transitioned
to new temperature regimes (higher temperature) due to global warming and climate change.
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework aims to conserve at least 30% of the
world's land by 2030, with Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) as a core priority.
Note:
Tropical rainforests are dense and warm forests typically found between 23.5 degrees to the
north and south of the Equator.
//
About: It is a multilateral treaty aimed at halting and reversing biodiversity loss globally
by 2030. It was adopted in December 2022 during the 15th meeting of the Conference of the
Parties (CoP) of UN CBD.
Purpose and Goals: It ensures that by 2030 at least 30% of areas of degraded terrestrial,
inland water, and marine and coastal ecosystems are under effective restoration.
It has 23 action-oriented global targets for urgent action over the decade to 2030
with Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) as a core priority.
Long-Term Vision: The framework envisions that by 2050, there will be a collective commitment
to living in harmony with nature, serving as a foundational guide for current actions and policies
on biodiversity conservation and sustainable use.
What are Key Highlights of the Study?
Temperature Changes in KBAs: Up to 66% of tropical forest KBAs have entered a new phase
characterised by new mean annual temperature regimes.
Regional Temperature Shifts: The percentage of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) experiencing
temperature changes was 72% in Africa, 59% in Latin America, and 49% in Asia and
Oceania.
However, in Asia and Oceania, 12% of KBAs have not transitioned to the new temperature
scenario though 23% of these are unprotected.
Vertical Temperature Change: The environment beneath the forest canopy is climatically
stable, with less temperature variation than in open habitats.
Disproportionate Impact: Some KBAs in Latin America (2.9%) and Asia and Oceania
(0.4%) have shifted to nearly entirely new temperature conditions, with over 80% of
measurements falling outside their previous ranges.
These include areas in the tropical Andes Mountains in Ecuador, Colombia, Venezuela,
and Panama.
Stable KBAs: Around 34% of tropical forest KBAs have not yet experienced new temperature
pattern, and over half of these are under some form of protection.
Northern Australia's tropical forests are among the least affected by novel temperature
conditions.
Origin of the Concept: BirdLife International initiated the idea by identifying Important Bird
and Biodiversity Areas (IBA). The success of this model led to the inclusion of other taxonomic
groups, such as plants, butterflies, and freshwater and marine biodiversity.
At the World Conservation Congress in Bangkok in 2004, the International Union
for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) recognized the need for a unified framework, which
culminated in the 2016 global KBA Standard.
About KBAs: KBAs are sites contributing significantly to the global persistence
of biodiversity.
They may contain unique species or species found only in limited areas, and
are critical for the planet’s health.
Criteria for Recognition: There are 11 criteria grouped under five categories that a site must
meet to qualify as a KBA. These categories are:
Threatened biodiversity
Geographically restricted biodiversity
Ecological integrity
Biological processes
Irreplaceability
Global KBA Presence: To date, more than 16,000 KBAs have been mapped worldwide.
The Key Biodiversity Areas Partnership, comprising 13 global conservation
organisations, is working to identify, map, and conserve KBAs across the globe.
India has 862 Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs), which are crucial for the
conservation of biodiversity E.g., Western Ghats.
What are the Impacts of Rising Temperatures on Tropical Forests and KBAs?
Disruption of Stable Microclimates: Sudden changes can exceed their thermal tolerance,
leading to stress or mortality. Species that occupy specific niches within stable microclimates
may face habitat loss or degradation.
Threat to Biodiversity: Increased temperatures can lead to habitat degradation, particularly
in sensitive ecosystems like rainforests, mangroves, and coral reefs.
Alteration of Ecosystem Services: Rising temperatures can impair ecosystem services such
as carbon sequestration, water regulation, and nutrient cycling.
Threat of Invasive Species: Warmer temperatures may allow invasive species to thrive and
outcompete native species.
Deforestation and Degradation: Higher temperatures may exacerbate deforestation and
forest degradation by making ecosystems more vulnerable to fires, pests, and diseases.
Shifts in Species Composition: Many species may migrate towards higher altitudes or
latitudes in search of cooler conditions leading to local extinction of species.
Impacts on Human Communities: Rising temperatures can affect forest
productivity threatening the livelihood of indigenous and local communities dependent on
tropical forests for food, medicine, and shelter.
What are Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)? How are they impacted by global warming and climate change?
Prelims
Ans: (c)
Q. With reference to ‘Global Environment Facility’, which of the following statements is/are
correct?(2014)
(a) It serves as financial mechanism for ‘Convention on Biological Diversity’ and ‘United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’
(c) It is an agency under OECD to facilitate the transfer of technology and funds underdeveloped countries
with specific aim to protect their environment
Ans: (a)
Mains
Q. How is the Government of India protecting traditional knowledge of medicine from patenting by
pharmaceutical companies? (2019)
Source: TH
Why in News?
Recently, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act 1955,
which permits immigrants from Bangladesh residing in Assam to secure Indian citizenship, as a
valid piece of legislation aligned to the Preambular value of fraternity.
According to the court, the principle of fraternity cannot be selectively applied to one
section living in Assam while another lot are labelled “illegal immigrants”.
The petitioning NGO argued to court that Section 6A threatened Assamese people's right to
preserve their political, linguistic, and cultural identity by bringing illegal immigrants and altering
its demography.
Majority Opinion:
Reaffirming Constitutional Validity: The court ruled that Section 6A does not violate
Articles 6 and 7 of the Constitution, which set 26th January 1950, as the cut-off for
granting citizenship to migrants from East and West Pakistan.
Section 6A applies from a much later date, so it operates separately from the
earlier constitutional provisions.
The cutoff date of 24th March 1971 is justified, as the Pakistani Army
initiated Operation Searchlight to suppress the Bangladeshi nationalist
movement in East Pakistan on 26th March 1971.
The Court stated that the petitioners failed to prove that the Assamese
people's ability to safeguard their culture was compromised by Section 6A.
The Court emphasised that constitutional and statutory provisions already
protect Assam's cultural and linguistic interests.
Power of Union: Parliament enacted Section 6A under its powers from Article
246 and Entry 17 of the Union List, which addresses citizenship, naturalization, and
aliens.
Assam's special citizenship law does not violate Article 14 (Equality), as the
state's migrant situation was distinct from the rest of India.
Acknowledging the Issue: The court affirmed that the ongoing migration from
Bangladesh has placed a significant burden on Assam.
It was emphasized that a nation can simultaneously accommodate
immigrants and refugees while focusing on sustainable development and
ensuring an equitable distribution of resources.
Clarifying Responsibility: It was emphasised that Section 6A should not be solely
blamed for this situation.
The government’s failure to detect and deport post-1971 immigrants from
Bangladesh in a timely manner was a major contributing factor.
Criticizing the System: The court found that the current mechanisms and Tribunals
responsible for identifying illegal immigrants in Assam are inadequate.
These systems a
re not sufficient for the timely enforcement of Section 6A and related laws, such
as the Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950, and the Foreigners
Act, 1946.
Need for Oversight: The enforcement of immigration and citizenship laws requires
judicial supervision and cannot be left to the discretion of authorities.
The Court asked the CJI to constitute a Bench for monitoring the
implementation of these laws in Assam.
Dissenting Opinion:
Dissenting view: The dissent declared Section 6A unconstitutional with
prospective effect, rejecting concerns that different ethnic groups would infringe on the
cultural and linguistic rights of others.
Balancing Development and Immigration: The dissent asserted that sustainable
development and population growth can coexist without conflict.
Accepting the petitioners' argument, which claimed that immigration impacts local
rights to sustainable development, could lead to restrictions on domestic inter-State
movement.
Immigrant Recognition: By upholding Section 6A, the judgment grants continued legal
protection and citizenship rights to immigrants from Bangladesh (entered Assam before 25th
March 1971).
This reinforces India’s commitment to protecting those displaced by the Bangladesh
Liberation War.
Assamese Identity Preservation: The majority opinion dismisses the notion that the
presence of immigrants automatically infringes upon the cultural and linguistic rights of
the Assamese people.
This means that despite demographic changes, the Assamese community’s rights
are protected through existing constitutional safeguards (Article 29(1)), allowing them
to preserve their identity.
Tensions on Demographic Shift: Critics argue that continued immigration strains Assam’ s
demographic balance, threatening its cultural identity and economic resources.
This could fuel local demands for stricter immigration controls or even political
mobilisation around cultural preservation.
Resource Allocation: Immigrants continue to be eligible for citizenship and the resources and
rights that come with it, potentially increasing strain on Assam’s already limited economic
resources.
This may necessitate more robust policies to ensure equitable resource distribution and
prevent further economic disparities.
Pressure on Immigration Laws: The judgment stresses the need for more effective
implementation of immigration laws, particularly the detection and deportation of illegal
immigrants who entered after the 1971 cut-off date.
Bangladesh Relations: By not recognizing post-1971 immigrants as Indian citizens, the
judgement could lead to tensions with Bangladesh, as it may be seen as India pushing
responsibility for these immigrants onto its neighbour, potentially straining diplomatic ties.
The decision could impact regional cooperation on border management, migration control,
and security, complicating India-Bangladesh relations.
Discuss the implications of the Supreme Court's recent judgement on Section 6A of the Citizenship Act
for Assam. How does the judgement balance humanitarian concerns with local development challenges?
Prelims
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) 1 and 3
(d) 2 and 3
Ans: (a)
Why in News?
The standing committee of the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) has approved five key road
stretches in Ladakh (four of which pass through Karakoram Wildlife Sanctuary), including a route to
Daulat Beg Oldie (DBO).
The NBWL approved the road stretches with conditions to implement wildlife passage plans to
protect species in the Karakoram sanctuary.
The move significantly aids the Ministry of Defence, enhancing infrastructure development along
the LAC in response to the 2020 India-China clashes in Galwan Valley.
What is the Strategic Significance of this Move?
These routes are crucial for troop movement and logistics and supporting the civilian population
particularly after the 2020 Galwan Valley clashes.
The existing Durbuk-Shyok-DBO (DS-DBO) route, which is 255 km long, runs along
the LAC and is within sight of Chinese-held territory to its east.
Daulat Beg Oldie (DBO) is the country’s sorthernmost military outpost in Ladakh and
houses its highest airstrip.
The Leh-Chalunka road (one of the five approved road stretches), connects the Indus Valley with
the Shyok Valley and traverses the Ladakh range, representing the sole motorised route over
this range.
What are the Other Major Developmental Projects along India's Border?
India-China Border:
Vibrant Villages Programme (VVP)
Border Area Development Programme (BADP)
India-Pakistan Border:
Smart Fencing in India (Comprehensive Integrated Border Management System –
CIBMS)
National Board for Wildlife (NBWL)
National Board for Wildlife is a statutory Board constituted officially in 2003 under the Wild Life
(Protection) Act, 1972.
It replaced the Indian Board for Wildlife, established in 1952.
The NBWL is chaired by the Prime Minister and is responsible for promotion of conservation
and development of wildlife and forests.
The board is ‘advisory’ in nature and can only advise the Government on policy making for
conservation of wildlife.
It serves as an apex body for the review of all wildlife-related matters and for the approval
of projects in and around national parks and sanctuaries.
The standing committee of NBWL is chaired by the Minister of Environment Forest and
Climate Change.
The standing committee approves all the projects falling within protected wildlife areas or
within 10 km of them.
Prelims
Q1. With reference to ‘National Investment and Infrastructure Fund’, which of the following
statements is/are correct? (2017)
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
Ans: (d)
Why in News?
The report highlights the widespread use of Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPEs) and
Nonylphenol (NP) in India and the associated environmental and health risks
Q. How is the National Green Tribunal (NGT) different from the Central Pollution Control Board
(CPCB)? (2018)
1. The NGT has been established by an Act whereas the CPCB has been created by an executive
order of the Government.
2. The NGT provides environmental justice and helps reduce the burden of litigation in the higher
courts whereas the CPCB promotes cleanliness of streams and wells, and aims to improve the
quality of air in the country.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
Ans: (b)
While addressing the inaugural sessions of the World Telecommunication Standardisation Assembly
(WTSA-24) and India Mobile Congress-2024, the Prime Minister advocated for the development of
a global regulatory framework for digital applications along with responsible use of Artificial
Intelligence (AI).
NOTTO Initiatives
Source: IE
Recently, the National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organisation (NOTTO) issued key initiatives
regarding cornea and tissue transplants.
According to the latest report of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on fiscal policy, global public
debt is expected to reach a record USD 100 trillion.
Recently, Omar Abdullah of the National Conference was sworn in as the Chief Minister of the UT
(union territory) of Jammu and Kashmir.
Oath of Office: As per Article 164(3), the CM and other ministers are administered the oath of
office by the Governor (or LG in Union Territories).
The oath signifies allegiance to the Constitution and the discharge of duties in
accordance with the law.
Omar Abdullah is the first CM of the UT to assume office following the abrogation of Article
370 and Jammu and Kashmir’s transition from a state to a Union Territory in 2019.
President's Rule Revoked: Following the election results, President’s Rule was revoked in
J&K.
President's Rule: Article 356 of the Constitution allows the President to impose
direct governance (President's Rule) in a state/Uts when the state government is
unable to function as per constitutional provisions.