Name of Project

Work of Augmentation of Water Supply System of Khujner

town under Amrut 2.0

DESIGN OF EXISTING RAW WATER PUMPING MAIN,

PUMPS , ELECTRIC SUB STATION OF KHUJNER MUNICIPAL
COUNCIL FROM INTAKE WELL TO WATER TREATMENT
PLANT

CLIENT
Municipal Council, Khujner

Jun-24

Submitted By

M/S MAN SINGH RAO(M.P.)

DESIGNED BY
SMD DIGITAL TESTING LABORATORY & INFRASTRUCTURE,
A-79/80, SOUMYA PRIVILEGE,TRILANGA, NEAR AURA MALL,
BHOPAL 462039 ( M.P.), Ph. No.- 07898470877
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

Note :- A. Domestic (@135 (LPCD) In liters per day

= 135.00 LPCD

1.0 ASSESSMENT OF WATER DEMAND

Water Demand Calculation

Year Population A. Domestic (@ D. Total Say in Clear Water Raw Water in Say in Yearly Water
135 LPCD) In D= (A+B+C) MLD in MLD with MLD with 135 MLD Requirement in
liters - MLD 135+10% +15% Losses MCM
per day Losses (10) (10)

2011 10785 1.46 1.46 1.46 1.61 1.68 1.70 0.62

2025 12994 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.93 2.01 2.05 0.75
2040 15666 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.33 2.43 2.45 0.89
2055 18652 2.52 2.52 2.52 2.77 2.90 2.90 1.06
 Design of Raw Water Pumping Machinery :-
From Proposed Intake Well to Water Treatment Plant
Data :
1) Water Demand 2040 2.45 MLD
2) Hour of Pumping 22 Hr.
3) Rate of Pumping 111363.64 LPH
4) No. of Pump set working 1.00 No
No. of Pump set Stand By 1.00 No
5) Rate of Flow per Pump 111363.64 LPH
6) Discharge of each pump in LPS 30.93 LPS
i.e. 0.03093434 M3/sec.
111.36 M3/Hrs.
Discharge of each pump in LPM 1856.06 LPM
8) Length of Rising Main 2240 Mtr
9) Dia of Rising Main 150 mm
9a) Dia of Rising Main 0.15 Mtr
10) C Value 130
11) Suction Level in Clear water pumping System- 416.50 Mtr
12) Heighest Ground Level in Raw water pumping System 430.50 Mtr
13) Static Head 14.00 Mtr

HEAD CALCULATIONS
15 Static Head on Pump (A) 14.00 Mtr
16 Frictional Head: Hf1 (B) 52.69 Mtr
19 Residual head + velocity head (C) 5.00 Mtr
20 Total Head 71.69 Mtr
21 Net Total head with 10% Design Margin 78.86 Mtr
Say 79.00 Mtr
Pump requirement : Q= 30.93 LPS H= 79.00 Mtr
Pump WHP (Water Horse Power) 32.58
Pump Efficiency 70%
Pump Break Horse Power 46.55 H.P.
Next Commercial rating of pump 50.00 H.P.
B) MOTOR
Motor BKW 37.30 KW
Motor Margin As per CPHEEO Manual 15%
Next Motor Rating after adding CPHEEO Manual 42.90 KW
Next Commercial Size : 43.00 KW
Provide Vertical Turbine Pump with, Motor required = 43.00 KW
No. of Pumps = (1 W + 1 S) = 2 Q= 30.93 LPS
H= 79.00 Mtr

Existing Intake well & Vertical Turbine Pumps Detailed

Intake well diameter = 5.00 MM
Intake well Depth = 10.00 Mtr
Pump Floor Level = 426.50 Mtr
Intake Foundation Level = 416.50 Mtr
Provide Centrifugal Pump with, Pump required = 7.50 H.P.
Q= 50.35 LPS
 Q= 30.00 M3/hrs
H= 35.00 Mtr
No. of Pumps 2.00 Nos.
Working By 1.00 Nos.
Stand By 1.00 Nos.
Note :- Existing Vertical Turbine Pump is fully damaged condition.
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

DESIGN FOR ECONOMICAL SIZE OF PUMPING MAIN (RISING MAIN)

PUMPING TRANSMISSION MAIN
From: Existing Intake Well
To: Existing WTP
DETAILS OF PIPES
1 Water requirement - Year Discharge Diameter Material Class HWC Rate / m
a Initial 2025 2.05 mld (mm) (Rs)
b Intermediate 2040 2.45 mld 100 DI CI A CLASS 130 1756
c Ultimate 2055 2.90 mld 150 DI CI A CLASS 130 2666
2 Length of pumping main L 2240.0 m 200 DI CI A CLASS 130 3852
3 Static head for pump h 14.0 m 250 DI CI A CLASS 130 5200
4 Design period T 30.0 years 300 DI CI A CLASS 130 6693
5 Combined efficiency of pump set e 70.0 % 350 DI CI A CLASS 130 8335
6 Cost of pumping unit Rs/kW 22000 Rs
7 Rate of interest r 10.50 % Note:-
8 Life of electric motor and pump n 15.0 years Intake Bed Level (m) 416.50 m
9 Hours of pumping t 22 hrs Floor Level(m) 426.50 m
10 Specific gravity of liquid g 1.02 Pro' WTP GL 418.00 m
11 Energy charges Rs/kWh 8.00 Rs WTP Level Top Aerator 430.50 m
12 Residual head at delivery end Rh 5.0 Total Head 14.00 m
13 Stand by Pump Required 100 % Say Static Head 14.00 m
SOLUTION :-
1st 10 years 2nd 10 years
1 Discharge at installation 2.05 mld 2.45 mld
2 Discharge at the end of 10 years 2.45 mld 2.9 mld
3 Average discharge 2.25 mld 2.675 mld
4 Hours of pumping for discharge after 10 yrs 22 hrs 22 hrs
5 Average hours of pumping for av.discharge 20.20 hrs 20.29 hrs
6 KW required at comb.efficiency of pump set 0.442 *H1 0.523 *H2
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

TABLE- 1
TABLE SHOWING VELOCITY AND LOSS OF HEAD FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES
Frictional losses Velocity Total head for 2240 m pipe lengths including
S.No. Pipe per 1000 m 14 m of static head and 5 m residual head S.No.
size for for for for 1st stage flow 2nd stage flow
1st stage 2nd stage 1st stage 2nd stage Frictional Other Total Frictional Other Total
flow flow flow flow losses losses Head-H1 losses losses Head-H2
(mm) (m/sec.) (m/sec.) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) 1
1 100 154.255 210.792 3.938 4.661 345.53 34.55 399.08 472.17 47.22 538.39 1
2 150 21.410 29.257 1.750 2.071 47.96 4.80 71.75 65.53 6.55 91.09 2
3 200 5.274 7.207 0.984 1.165 11.81 1.18 31.99 16.14 1.61 36.76 3
4 250 1.779 2.431 0.630 0.746 3.98 0.40 23.38 5.44 0.54 24.99 4
5 300 0.732 1.000 0.438 0.518 1.64 0.16 20.80 2.24 0.22 21.46 5
6 350 0.345 0.472 0.321 0.380 0.77 0.08 19.85 1.06 0.11 20.16 6

TABLE- 2
TABLE SHOWING KILOWATTS REQUIRED AND COST OF PUMPSETS FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES
Ist stage flow 2nd stage flow
S.No. Pipe Total Kilowatt/Horse power Cost of Total Kilowatt/Horse power Cost of
Size Head required including pump sets Head required including pump sets
H1 100 % H2 100 %
standby standby
(mm) (m) (kw) (H.P.) (Rs in Lakh) (m) (kw) (H.P.) (Rs in Lakh)
1 100 399.08 353 473 77.60 538.39 563 755 123.92
2 150 71.75 63 85 13.95 91.09 95 128 20.96
3 200 31.99 28 38 6.22 36.76 38 52 8.46
4 250 23.38 21 28 4.55 24.99 26 35 5.75
5 300 20.80 18 25 4.05 21.46 22 30 4.94
6 350 19.85 18 24 3.86 20.16 21 28 4.64
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

TABLE- 3
TABLE SHOWING COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF OVERALL COST STRUCTUREOF PUMPING MAIN
Total Head Thickness Rates Cost of 1st stage flow
Pipe 1st stage 2nd stage of of 2240 Cost of Annual cost Energy
Size flow flow pipe pipe m pipe pumpsets energy charges
line charges capitalised
(mm) (m) (m) (mm) (Rs) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh)
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
100 399.08 538.39 CI A CLASS 1756 39.33 77.60 104.12 769.81
150 71.75 91.09 CI A CLASS 2666 59.72 13.95 18.72 138.41
200 31.99 36.76 CI A CLASS 3852 86.28 6.22 8.35 61.72
250 23.38 24.99 CI A CLASS 5200 116.48 4.55 6.10 45.10
300 20.80 21.46 CI A CLASS 6693 149.92 4.05 5.43 40.13
350 19.85 20.16 CI A CLASS 8335 186.70 3.86 5.18 38.29

1st stage flow 2nd stage flow Intial capital Grand Total of
Pipe Total Cost of Annual Energy investment capitalised
Size capitalised pumpsets cost of charges for pump sets cost for
cost energy capitalised and annual 30
charges energy charges years
(mm) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh)
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
100 886.75 123.92 333.98 2469.39 579.99 1466.73
150 212.08 20.96 56.50 417.79 98.13 310.20
200 154.22 8.46 22.80 168.59 39.60 193.82
250 166.13 5.75 15.50 114.62 26.92 193.05
300 194.10 4.94 13.32 98.45 23.12 217.22
350 228.86 4.64 12.51 92.48 21.72 250.58
The Economical diameter of pumping main is 150 mm CI
Per KM Friction Losses Year -2040 21.41 m
Per KM Friction Losses Year -2055 29.26 m
 1. Raw Water Pumping Main from Intake well to Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
Pipe Table Junction Table
ID Label Start Stop Node Length Diameter Material Hazen- Flow Velocity Headloss Headloss Notes ID Label Elevation Demand Hydraulic Pressure
Node (Scaled) (mm) Williams (MLD) (m/s) Gradient (Friction) (m) (MLD) Grade (m) (m H2O)
(m) C (m/km) (m)
6684 P-1 J-1 EX WTP 2,228 150 EX CI Pipe line 130 2.67 1.75 21.367 47.62 Existing 6685 J-1 426.50 0.00 484.26 57.650
6691 P-2 J-1 PMP-10 8 150 EX CI Pipe line 130 2.67 1.75 21.37 0.16 Existing 6686 EX WTP 430.50 2.67 436.65 6.130
6692 P-3 PMP-10EX INTAKE WELL 3 150 EX CI Pipe line 130 2.67 1.75 21.37 0.07 Existing

Raw Water Pumping Main From Intake well to WTP

1 Existing 150 mm dia. CI A Class pipe 2,240 m
Total 2,240 m

Note :- Hence, CI Pipe is fail.

 Name of Project

Work of Augmentation of Water Supply System of Khujner

town under Amrut 2.0

DESIGN OF EXISTING CLEAR WATER PUMPING MAIN,

PUMPS , ELECTRIC SUB STATION OF KHUJNER MUNICIPAL
COUNCIL FROM WATER TREATMENT PLANT TO OHT's

CLIENT
Municipal Council, Khujner

June’ 2024

Submitted By

M/S MAN SINGH RAO (M.P.)

DESIGNED BY
SMD DIGITAL TESTING LABORATORY & INFRASTRUCTURE,
A-79/80, SOUMYA PRIVILEGE,TRILANGA, NEAR AURA MALL,
BHOPAL 462039 ( M.P.), Ph. No.- 07898470877
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

Note :- A. Domestic (@135 (LPCD) In liters per day

= 135.0 LPCD

1.0 ASSESSMENT OF WATER DEMAND

Water Demand Calculation

Year Population A. Domestic (@ D. Total Say in Clear Water Raw Water in Say in Yearly Water
135 LPCD) In D= (A+B+C) MLD in MLD with MLD with 135 MLD Requirement in
liters - MLD 135+10% +15% Losses MCM
per day Losses (10) (10)

2011 10785 1.46 1.46 1.46 1.61 1.68 1.70 0.62

2025 12994 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.93 2.01 2.05 0.75
2040 15666 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.33 2.43 2.45 0.89
2055 18652 2.52 2.52 2.52 2.77 2.90 2.90 1.06
 Design of Clear Water Pumping Machinery (For First Phase 15 years)
DEMAND AT
Data : P-2 P-1 P-3
PUMP
Unit
1 Water Demand 1.300 1.000 2.300 2.33 MLD
2 Hour of Pumping 22 22 22 22 Hr.
3 Rate of Pumping 59091 45455 104545 105955 LPH
4 No. of Pump set working 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No
5 No. of Pump set Stand By 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No
6 Rate of Flow per Pump 59091 45455 104545 105954.5455 LPH
7 Discharge of each pump in LPS 16 13 29 29.43 LPS
8 i.e., 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.029431818 M3/sec.
9 Discharge of each pump in LPM 985 758 1742 1765.91 LPM
10 Length of Rising Main 1648 50 46
11 Dia of Rising Main 150 150 150
28 C Value 140
30 Lowest Ground Level in Clear water pumping System (Station) 424.00 Mtr
31 Heighest Water Level in Clear water pumping System (including Staging Height + Container Height of OHT) 454.30 Mtr

HEAD CALCULATIONS
34 Static Head on Pump 30.30 Mtr
Length of Rising Main 1648 50 46 0 Mtr
35 Dia of Rising Main 150 150 150 0 MM
36 Frictional Head: Hf2 9.50 0.18 0.76 10.44 Mtr
Per KM Friction Losses 5.765 3.546 16.584
45 Total Frictional Head Hf with 10% design margin as per CPHEEO Manual 11.48 Mtr
46 Residual head + velocity head 3.00 Mtr
47 Total Head 44.78 Mtr
48 Net Total head required 45.00 Mtr

Pump requirement : Q= 29.43 LPS 45.00 Mtr

Pump WHP (Water Horse Power) 17.66

Pump Efficiency 70%

Pump BKW (As per CPHHEO Mannual = (G*Q*H*Sp Gravity/ Eff of Pump)) 18.56 BKW

Pump rating in HP 24.88 H.P.

Next Commercial rating of pump in HP 25.00 H.P.
B) MOTOR
Motor BKW 18.65 KW
Motor Margin As per CPHEEO Manual 15%
Next Motor Rating after adding CPHEEO Manual 22.38 KW
22.50 KW
22.50 KW
No. of Pumps = (2 W + 1 S) = 3 29.43 LPS
45.00 Mtr
 ELECTRIC DESIGN
A) Transformer for Clear Water
Full Load in the Clear Water Pump House
Clear Water Pump : 1 No. Woeking
30.00 KW Working Unit= 1 KW KW 30.00 KW
RW Pumps 43.00 KW Working Unit= 1 KW KW 43.00 KW
Lighting Load ( Pump Houses ) 3 HP 2.24 KW
EOT Load 2 HP 1.49 KW
Chlorination system load 2 HP 1.49 KW
Instrumentation & SCADA Load 2 HP 1.49 KW
Total 79.71 KW
Total KVA 99.64 KVA

Transformer Capacity =[ Kw/( Cos ɸ x ɳ) ] x factor of safety 150.00 KVA

Where, Next Commercial Rating of Transformer 150.00 KVA
Kw = Total working Load in Kw 79.71 Kw
Cos ɸ - Power factor 0.8
Factor of safety in Case of VFD Starter 1.2

Transformer full load Current (I) =Kva/(√3 x V x p.f.) 208.68 Amp

Where,
V= Voltage in Kv 0.415
Main Incoming Breaker. … 229.55 Amp
(1.3 times of full load current of transformer
Say 230 AMP
B) BUS BAR

Bus Bar rating = At Par to Incomer Breaker Rating … 230 Amp

C) MOTOR SWITCH for Raw Water Pump

a) For Motor 110.00 KW

Motor full load Current I = Kw/(√3 x V x p.f) 192.00 Amp

Motor Switch rating = 1.3 times Full Load Current of Motor. … 249.6 AMP
250.00 AMP
Capacitor Switch
Capacitor Current 86.60 AMP
(Kvar x 10^3) / ( √3 x V)
Capacitor Switch rating = 2 times Capacitor current. 173.21 AMP
(Next commercial range.) 175.00 AMP
CAPACITOR SELECTION
Power Factor Considered [cos(Ø1)] = 0.80
Power Factor Required [cos(Ø2)] = 0.99
Correction Factor = Tan(Ø1)-Tan(Ø2)
Correction factor = 0.608
kW X Correction
Estimated Capacitor rating (kVAR) = Factor
Estimated Capacitor rating (kVAR) = 60.53
Selected Capacitor Bank (kVAR) = 60.00

4 of 16
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

DESIGN FOR ECONOMICAL SIZE OF PUMPING MAIN (CLEAR WATER RISING MAIN)
PUMPING TRANSMISSION MAIN
From: Existing WTP
To: Junction -1
DETAILS OF PIPES
1 Water requirement - Year Discharge Diameter Material Class HWC Rate / m
a Initial 2025 1.93 mld (mm) (Rs)
b Intermediate 2040 2.33 mld 100 DI CI A CLASS 130 1756
c Ultimate 2055 2.77 mld 150 DI CI A CLASS 130 2666
2 Length of pumping main L 46.0 m 200 DI CI A CLASS 130 3852
3 Static head for pump h 54.00 m 250 DI CI A CLASS 130 5200
4 Design period T 30.00 years 300 DI CI A CLASS 130 6693
5 Combined efficiency of pump set e 70.00 % 350 DI CI A CLASS 130 8335
6 Cost of pumping unit Rs/kW 20000 Rs
7 Rate of interest r 10.00 %
8 Life of electric motor and pump n 15.00 years Note :- GL at WTP 424.00 Mtr.
9 Hours of pumping t 22.00 hrs GL at J-1 427.25 Mtr.
10 Specific gravity of liquid g 1.00 Height Level 454.30 Mtr.
11 Energy charges Rs/kWh 8.00 Rs Ground Variation 3.00 Mtr.
12 Residual head at delivery end Rh 3.0 Mtr Friction Losses 19.40 Mtr.
13 Stand by Pump Required 50 % Static Head 30.30 Mtr.
SOLUTION :- Say Static Head 54.00 Mtr.
1st 15 years 2nd 15 years
1 Discharge at installation 1.93 mld 2.33 mld
2 Discharge at the end of 15 years 2.33 mld 2.77 mld
3 Average discharge 2.128 mld 2.5515 mld
4 Hours of pumping for discharge after 15 yrs 22.00 hrs 22.00 hrs
5 Average hours of pumping for av.discharge 20.08 hrs 20.25 hrs
6 KW required at comb.efficiency of pump set 0.412 *H1 0.490 *H2
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

TABLE- 1
TABLE SHOWING VELOCITY AND LOSS OF HEAD FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES
Frictional losses Velocity Total head for 46 m pipe lengths including
S.No. Pipe per 1000 m 54.00 m of static head and 3 m residual head
size for for for for 1st stage flow 2nd stage flow
1st stage 2nd stage 1st stage 2nd stage Frictional Other Total Frictional Other Total
flow flow flow flow losses losses Head-H1 losses losses Head-H2
(mm) (m/sec.) (m/sec.) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1 100 140.668 193.887 3.746 4.455 6.47 0.65 64.12 8.92 0.89 66.81
2 150 19.524 26.910 1.665 1.980 0.90 0.09 57.99 1.24 0.12 58.36
3 200 4.809 6.629 0.937 1.114 0.22 0.02 57.24 0.30 0.03 57.34
4 250 1.622 2.236 0.599 0.713 0.07 0.01 57.08 0.10 0.01 57.11
5 300 0.667 0.920 0.416 0.495 0.03 0.00 57.03 0.04 0.00 57.05
6 350 0.315 0.434 0.306 0.364 0.01 0.00 57.02 0.02 0.00 57.02

TABLE- 2
TABLE SHOWING KILOWATTS REQUIRED AND COST OF PUMPSETS FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES
Ist stage flow 2nd stage flow
S.No. Pipe Total Kilowatt/Horse power Cost of Total Kilowatt/Horse power Cost of
Size Head required including pump sets Head required including pump sets
H1 50 % H2 50 %
standby standby
(mm) (m) (kw) (H.P.) (Rs in Lakh) (m) (kw) (H.P.) (Rs in Lakh)
1 100 64.12 40 53 7.93 66.81 49 66 9.83
2 150 57.99 36 48 7.17 58.36 43 58 8.58
3 200 57.24 35 48 7.08 57.34 42 57 8.43
4 250 57.08 35 47 7.06 57.11 42 56 8.40
5 300 57.03 35 47 7.05 57.05 42 56 8.39
6 350 57.02 35 47 7.05 57.02 42 56 8.39
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

TABLE- 3
TABLE SHOWING COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF OVERALL COST STRUCTUREOF PUMPING MAIN
Total Head Thickness Rates Cost of 1st stage flow
S.No. Pipe 1st stage 2nd stage of of 46.0 Cost of Annual cost Energy
Size flow flow pipe pipe m pipe pumpsets energy charges
line charges capitalised
(mm) (m) (m) (mm) (Rs) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 100 64.12 66.81 CI A CLASS 1756 0.81 7.93 15.51 117.97
2 150 57.99 58.36 CI A CLASS 2666 1.23 7.17 14.03 106.69
3 200 57.24 57.34 CI A CLASS 3852 1.77 7.08 13.85 105.32
4 250 57.08 57.11 CI A CLASS 5200 2.39 7.06 13.81 105.03
5 300 57.03 57.05 CI A CLASS 6693 3.08 7.05 13.80 104.94
6 350 57.02 57.02 CI A CLASS 8335 3.83 7.05 13.79 104.91

1st stage flow 2nd stage flow Intial capital Grand Total of
Pipe Total Cost of Annual Energy investment capitalised
Size capitalised pumpsets cost of charges for pump sets cost for
cost energy capitalised and annual 30
charges energy charges years
(mm) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh)
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
100 126.71 9.83 29.07 221.09 55.28 181.99
150 115.09 8.58 25.39 193.13 48.29 163.38
200 114.17 8.43 24.94 189.73 47.44 161.61
250 114.48 8.40 24.85 189.00 47.25 161.73
300 115.07 8.39 24.82 188.78 47.20 162.27
350 115.79 8.39 24.81 188.69 47.18 162.97
The Economical diameter of pumping main is 150.00 mm CI A CLASS PIPE
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

DESIGN FOR ECONOMICAL SIZE OF PUMPING MAIN (CLEAR WATER RISING MAIN)
PUMPING TRANSMISSION MAIN
From: Junction -1
To: Existing 600 KL OHT
DETAILS OF PIPES
1 Water requirement - Year Discharge Diameter Material Class HWC Rate / m
a Initial 2025 1.08 mld (mm) (Rs)
b Intermediate 2040 1.33 mld 100 DI CI A CLASS 130 1756
c Ultimate 2055 1.62 mld 150 DI CI A CLASS 130 2666
2 Length of pumping main L 1648.0 m 200 DI CI A CLASS 130 3852
3 Static head for pump h 28.00 m 250 DI CI A CLASS 130 5200
4 Design period T 30.00 years 300 DI CI A CLASS 130 6693
5 Combined efficiency of pump set e 70.00 % 350 DI CI A CLASS 130 8335
6 Cost of pumping unit Rs/kW 20000 Rs
7 Rate of interest r 10.00 %
8 Life of electric motor and pump n 15.00 years Note :- GL at J-1 427.25 Mtr.
9 Hours of pumping t 22.00 hrs GL Of Ex. OHT-600 KL 431.50 Mtr.
10 Specific gravity of liquid g 1.00 Tank Height 18.00 Mtr.
11 Energy charges Rs/kWh 8.00 Rs Container Height 5.00 Mtr.
12 Residual head at delivery end Rh 3.0 Mtr Top FSL 454.50 Mtr.
13 Stand by Pump Required 50 % Static Head 27.25 Mtr.
SOLUTION :- Static Head 28.00 Mtr.
1st 15 years 2nd 15 years
1 Discharge at installation 1.08 mld 1.33 mld
2 Discharge at the end of 15 years 1.33 mld 1.62 mld
3 Average discharge 1.205 mld 1.475 mld
4 Hours of pumping for discharge after 15 yrs 22.00 hrs 22.00 hrs
5 Average hours of pumping for av.discharge 19.93 hrs 20.03 hrs
6 KW required at comb.efficiency of pump set 0.235 *H1 0.286 *H2
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

TABLE- 1
TABLE SHOWING VELOCITY AND LOSS OF HEAD FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES
Frictional losses Velocity Total head for 1648 m pipe lengths including
S.No. Pipe per 1000 m 28.00 m of static head and 3 m residual head
size for for for for 1st stage flow 2nd stage flow
1st stage 2nd stage 1st stage 2nd stage Frictional Other Total Frictional Other Total
flow flow flow flow losses losses Head-H1 losses losses Head-H2
(mm) (m/sec.) (m/sec.) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1 100 49.764 71.706 2.138 2.604 82.01 8.20 121.21 118.17 11.82 160.99
2 150 6.907 9.952 0.950 1.157 11.38 1.14 43.52 16.40 1.64 49.04
3 200 1.701 2.451 0.534 0.651 2.80 0.28 34.08 4.04 0.40 35.44
4 250 0.574 0.827 0.342 0.417 0.95 0.09 32.04 1.36 0.14 32.50
5 300 0.236 0.340 0.238 0.289 0.39 0.04 31.43 0.56 0.06 31.62
6 350 0.111 0.161 0.174 0.213 0.18 0.02 31.20 0.26 0.03 31.29

TABLE- 2
TABLE SHOWING KILOWATTS REQUIRED AND COST OF PUMPSETS FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES
Ist stage flow 2nd stage flow
S.No. Pipe Total Kilowatt/Horse power Cost of Total Kilowatt/Horse power Cost of
Size Head required including pump sets Head required including pump sets
H1 50 % H2 50 %
standby standby
(mm) (m) (kw) (H.P.) (Rs in Lakh) (m) (kw) (H.P.) (Rs in Lakh)
1 100 121.21 43 57 8.55 160.99 69 93 13.84
2 150 43.52 15 21 3.07 49.04 21 28 4.21
3 200 34.08 12 16 2.40 35.44 15 20 3.05
4 250 32.04 11 15 2.26 32.50 14 19 2.79
5 300 31.43 11 15 2.22 31.62 14 18 2.72
6 350 31.20 11 15 2.20 31.29 13 18 2.69
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

TABLE- 3
TABLE SHOWING COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF OVERALL COST STRUCTUREOF PUMPING MAIN
Total Head Thickness Rates Cost of 1st stage flow
S.No. Pipe 1st stage 2nd stage of of 1648.0 Cost of Annual cost Energy
Size flow flow pipe pipe m pipe pumpsets energy charges
line charges capitalised
(mm) (m) (m) (mm) (Rs) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 100 121.21 160.99 CI A CLASS 1756 28.94 8.55 16.60 126.29
2 150 43.52 49.04 CI A CLASS 2666 43.94 3.07 5.96 45.34
3 200 34.08 35.44 CI A CLASS 3852 63.48 2.40 4.67 35.51
4 250 32.04 32.50 CI A CLASS 5200 85.70 2.26 4.39 33.38
5 300 31.43 31.62 CI A CLASS 6693 110.30 2.22 4.30 32.74
6 350 31.20 31.29 CI A CLASS 8335 137.36 2.20 4.27 32.51

1st stage flow 2nd stage flow Intial capital Grand Total of
Pipe Total Cost of Annual Energy investment capitalised
Size capitalised pumpsets cost of charges for pump sets cost for
cost energy capitalised and annual 30
charges energy charges years
(mm) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh)
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
100 163.78 13.84 40.49 307.97 77.04 240.82
150 92.35 4.21 12.33 93.82 23.47 115.82
200 101.40 3.05 8.91 67.80 16.96 118.36
250 121.34 2.79 8.17 62.17 15.55 136.89
300 145.26 2.72 7.95 60.48 15.13 160.39
350 172.07 2.69 7.87 59.86 14.97 187.04
The Economical diameter of pumping main is 150.00 mm CI A CLASS PIPE
Per KM Frictional losses Year -2040 6.91 Per KM
Per KM Frictional losses Year -2055 9.95 Per KM
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

DESIGN FOR ECONOMICAL SIZE OF PUMPING MAIN (CLEAR WATER RISING MAIN)
PUMPING TRANSMISSION MAIN
From: Junction -1
To: Proposed 500 KL OHT Near WTP
DETAILS OF PIPES
1 Water requirement - Year Discharge Diameter Material Class HWC Rate / m
a Initial 2025 0.85 mld (mm) (Rs)
b Intermediate 2040 0.99 mld 100 DI K-7 140 1074
c Ultimate 2055 1.15 mld 150 DI K-7 140 1573
2 Length of pumping main L 50.0 m 200 DI K-7 140 2007
3 Static head for pump h 24.00 m 250 DI K-7 140 2628
4 Design period T 30.00 years 300 DI K-7 140 3319
5 Combined efficiency of pump set e 70.00 % 350 DI K-7 140 4147
6 Cost of pumping unit Rs/kW 20000 Rs
7 Rate of interest r 10.00 %
8 Life of electric motor and pump n 15.00 years Note :- GL at J-1 427.25 Mtr.
9 Hours of pumping t 22.00 hrs GL Of Pro. OHT-500 KL 427.00 Mtr.
10 Specific gravity of liquid g 1.00 Tank Height 18.00 Mtr.
11 Energy charges Rs/kWh 8.00 Rs Container Height 4.50 Mtr.
12 Residual head at delivery end Rh 3.0 Mtr Top FSL 449.50 Mtr.
13 Stand by Pump Required 100 % Static Head 22.25 Mtr.
SOLUTION :- Static Head 24.00 Mtr.
1st 15 years 2nd 15 years
1 Discharge at installation 0.85 mld 0.99 mld
2 Discharge at the end of 15 years 0.99 mld 1.15 mld
3 Average discharge 0.920 mld 1.070 mld
4 Hours of pumping for discharge after 15 yrs 22.00 hrs 22.00 hrs
5 Average hours of pumping for av.discharge 20.44 hrs 20.47 hrs
6 KW required at comb.efficiency of pump set 0.175 *H1 0.203 *H2
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

TABLE- 1
TABLE SHOWING VELOCITY AND LOSS OF HEAD FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES
Frictional losses Velocity Total head for 50 m pipe lengths including
S.No. Pipe per 1000 m 24.00 m of static head and 3 m residual head
size for for for for 1st stage flow 2nd stage flow
1st stage 2nd stage 1st stage 2nd stage Frictional Other Total Frictional Other Total
flow flow flow flow losses losses Head-H1 losses losses Head-H2
(mm) (m/sec.) (m/sec.) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1 100 25.112 33.141 1.591 1.848 1.26 0.13 28.38 1.66 0.17 28.82
2 150 3.485 4.600 0.707 0.821 0.17 0.02 27.19 0.23 0.02 27.25
3 200 0.859 1.133 0.398 0.462 0.04 0.00 27.05 0.06 0.01 27.06
4 250 0.290 0.382 0.255 0.296 0.01 0.00 27.02 0.02 0.00 27.02
5 300 0.119 0.157 0.177 0.205 0.01 0.00 27.01 0.01 0.00 27.01
6 350 0.056 0.074 0.130 0.151 0.00 0.00 27.00 0.00 0.00 27.00

TABLE- 2
TABLE SHOWING KILOWATTS REQUIRED AND COST OF PUMPSETS FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES
Ist stage flow 2nd stage flow
S.No. Pipe Total Kilowatt/Horse power Cost of Total Kilowatt/Horse power Cost of
Size Head required including pump sets Head required including pump sets
H1 100 % H2 100 %
standby standby
(mm) (m) (kw) (H.P.) (Rs in Lakh) (m) (kw) (H.P.) (Rs in Lakh)
1 100 28.38 10 13 1.99 28.82 12 16 2.34
2 150 27.19 10 13 1.90 27.25 11 15 2.22
3 200 27.05 9 13 1.89 27.06 11 15 2.20
4 250 27.02 9 13 1.89 27.02 11 15 2.20
5 300 27.01 9 13 1.89 27.01 11 15 2.20
6 350 27.00 9 13 1.89 27.00 11 15 2.20
AMRUT 2.0 Detailed Project Report

TABLE- 3
TABLE SHOWING COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF OVERALL COST STRUCTUREOF PUMPING MAIN
Total Head Thickness Rates Cost of 1st stage flow
S.No. Pipe 1st stage 2nd stage of of 50.0 Cost of Annual cost Energy
Size flow flow pipe pipe m pipe pumpsets energy charges
line charges capitalised
(mm) (m) (m) (mm) (Rs) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 100 28.38 28.82 K-7 1074 0.54 1.99 2.97 22.58
2 150 27.19 27.25 K-7 1573 0.79 1.90 2.84 21.63
3 200 27.05 27.06 K-7 2007 1.00 1.89 2.83 21.51
4 250 27.02 27.02 K-7 2628 1.31 1.89 2.83 21.49
5 300 27.01 27.01 K-7 3319 1.66 1.89 2.82 21.48
6 350 27.00 27.00 K-7 4147 2.07 1.89 2.82 21.48

1st stage flow 2nd stage flow Intial capital Grand Total of
Pipe Total Cost of Annual Energy investment capitalised
Size capitalised pumpsets cost of charges for pump sets cost for
cost energy capitalised and annual 30
charges energy charges years
(mm) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh) (Rs in lakh)
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
100 25.10 2.34 7.01 53.33 13.33 38.43
150 24.32 2.22 6.63 50.43 12.60 36.92
200 24.41 2.20 6.58 50.07 12.51 36.93
250 24.70 2.20 6.57 50.00 12.50 37.19
300 25.03 2.20 6.57 49.97 12.49 37.52
350 25.44 2.20 6.57 49.97 12.49 37.93
The Economical diameter of pumping main is 150.00 mm DI K-7
Per KM Frictional losses Year -2040 3.49 Per KM
Per KM Frictional losses Year -2055 4.60 Per KM
 1. Clear Water Pumping Main from Water treatment plant to All OHT's (Year -2040)
Pipe Table Junction Table
ID Label Start Stop Node Length Diameter Material Hazen- Flow Velocity Headloss Headloss Notes ID Label Elevation Demand Hydraulic Pressure
Node (Scaled) (mm) Williams (MLD) (m/s) Gradient (Friction) (m) (MLD) Grade (m) (m H2O)
(m) C (m/km) (m)
6684 P-1 J-1 PRO. OHT-2 50 150 Pro DI K-7 140 1.09 0.71 3.545 0.18 Proposed 6686 PRO. OHT-2 450.000 1.090 472.930 22.880
6689 P-2 J-1 EX OHT ZONE -1 1648 150 EX CI Pipe 130 1.45 0.95 6.898 11.37 Existing 6685 J-1 427.250 0.000 473.100 45.760
6695 P-3 EX WTP PMP-10 27 150 EX CI Pipe 130 2.54 1.66 19.481 0.52 Existing 6690 EX OHT ZONE -1 454.300 1.450 461.740 7.420
6696 P-4 PMP-10 J-1 19 150 EX CI Pipe 130 2.54 1.66 19.482 0.37 Existing

Clear Water Pumping Main

1 Proposed 150 mm dia. DI K-7 50 Mtr
2 Existing 150 mm dia. CI A Class 1,700 Mtr
Total 1,750 Mtr
 SURGE PRESSURE CALCULATION FOR CLEAR WATER RISING MAIN FOR INTERMEDIATE YEAR -2040 (From Existing WTP To Different ESRs/OHTs)

Diameter Wall Modulus of Bulk Normal Velocity of Max Water Friction 10% of Max.Working Total Permissible
Total
of pipe Thicknes Elasticity of Modulus of Velocity of Pressure Wave Pressure Hmax Head Loss Friction Head pressure in pressure pressure
Pipe Safe/ pressure
Sr.No. Pipe STATUS (inner) d s Ct pipe material E Water k Pipe V0 C = 1425 = C.V0 / g Loss pipe line with with surge
Material Unsafe with surge
surge
/(1+kd/ECt)0.5 (Kg/ cm2)
m m kg/m2 kg/m2 m/s m/s m m m m m m
1 P-1 Pro DI K-7 Proposed 0.15 0.0050 1.70E+10 2.07E+08 0.71 1219.56 88.27 3.58 0.36 45.93 138.13 125 Unsafe 13.81
2 P-2 EX CI Pipe Existing 0.15 0.0050 1.70E+10 2.07E+08 0.95 1219.56 118.10 1.14 0.11 30.44 149.80 125 Unsafe 14.98
3 P-3 EX CI Pipe Existing 0.15 0.0050 1.70E+10 2.07E+08 1.66 1219.56 206.37 0.07 0.01 45.85 252.29 125 Unsafe 25.23
 SURGE PRESSURE CALCULATION FOR CLEAR WATER RISING MAIN FOR INTERMEDIATE YEAR -2040 (From Existing WTP To Different ESRs/OHTs)

Velocity of Total
Diameter Wall Modulus of Bulk Normal Max Water 10% of Max.Working Permissible Total
Pressure Wave
Pipe of pipe Thicknes Elasticity of Modulus of Velocity of Pressure Hmax Friction Friction Head pressure in
pressure
pressure Safe/ pressure
Sr.No. Pipe STATUS C = 1425 Head Loss with
Material (inner) d s Ct pipe material E Water k Pipe V0 = C.V0 / g Loss pipe line with surge Unsafe with surge
/(1+kd/ECt)0.5 surge
(Kg/ cm2)
m m kg/m2 kg/m2 m/s m/s m m m m m m
1 P-1 Pro DI K-7 Proposed 0.15 0.0050 1.70E+10 2.07E+08 0.71 1219.56 88.27 3.58 0.36 45.93 138.13 125 Unsafe 13.81
2 P-2 EX CI Pipe Existing 0.15 0.0050 1.70E+10 2.07E+08 0.95 1219.56 118.10 1.14 0.11 30.44 149.80 125 Unsafe 14.98
3 P-3 EX CI Pipe Existing 0.15 0.0050 1.70E+10 2.07E+08 1.66 1219.56 206.37 0.07 0.01 45.85 252.29 125 Unsafe 25.23