Scribd
Upload
10 views2 pages

Writing Task 22-03-204

Uploaded by

th105428
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views2 pages

Writing Task 22-03-204

Uploaded by

th105428
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Some people think it is important to construct new buildings rather than wasting money on maintaining

the old ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is claimed by an inundation of individuals that erecting pristine construction is more pivotal than
allocating money for conserving the ancient one. From my perspective, I wholeheartedly oppose to this
statement. It is my convention that preserving the previous ones is more beneficial

To commence with, there are many justifications to elucidate why maintaining the old construction is
more advantageous. First and foremost, it is indispensable that dedicating money to conserving age-old
buildings is capable of fostering their historical values. To be specific, this could be an efficient way to
restore the initial state of the buildings and remain the cultural identity of some countries, which plays
an imperative role in ameliorating the tourism. As a result, not only do they remain historical values but
they also stand a golden chance of attracting more visitors in order to enrich the nation with the
development of the tourism. In addition, distributing money to preserve the archaic buildings can entitle
individuals to possess a genuine sense of relating to the past unlike a replica of them, which might
improve the customer experience.

In addition, it is undeniable that allocating budget for maintaining the old ones is more economical. To
make it clear, repairing only a part of them obviously requires less amount of money and human
resources rather than erecting all of the buildings. Thus, that money could be distributed to not only
restore the old structure but also to invest on other categories in order to enhance the whole nation,
which apparently relieve the burden of national budget.

To conclude, I advocate the statement that spending money on maintaining the age-old buildings is not
wasteful; on the contrary, it might be the optimal remedy to foster historical values and cultural identity.
Furthermore, this could also empower individuals or the governments to save their own budgets.

Dilapidated: tàn phá

It is asserted by a multitude of individuals that constructing new buildings is


more crucial than allocating funds to preserve the old ones. I am firmly
opposed to this statement. It is my conviction that preserving their historical
significance is of utmost importance.

To commence with, there are many justifications to elucidate why


maintaining the old constructions is more advantageous. First and foremost,
it is indispensable that dedicating money to conserving age-old buildings is
capable of fostering their historical values. To be specific, this could be an
efficient way to restore the initial state of the buildings and maintain the
cultural identity of some countries, which plays an imperative role in
enhancing tourism. As a result, not only do they maintain historical values
but they also have a significant opportunity to attract more visitors,
enriching the nation with tourism development. In addition, distributing
money to preserve the archaic buildings can enable individuals to experience
a genuine sense of connection to the past unlike a replica of them, which
might improve the visitor experience.

In addition, it is undeniable that allocating budget for maintaining the old


ones is more economical. Repairing only parts of them obviously requires a
smaller amount of money and human resources rather than constructing
entirely new buildings. Thus, that money could be distributed to not only
restore the old structures but also invest in other categories to enhance the
nation as a whole, which could significantly alleviate the burden of the
national budget.

To conclude, I advocate the statement that spending money on maintaining


the age-old buildings is not wasteful; on the contrary, not only is it not
wasteful, but it may also be the most effective strategy to foster historical
values and cultural identity. Furthermore, this could also empower
individuals or governments to save their own budgets.

You might also like