0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views6 pages

Matrix V P 1

Uploaded by

Aditya Raj Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views6 pages

Matrix V P 1

Uploaded by

Aditya Raj Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Oat-res.

Determinants, Hermitian and Skew-Hermitian Matrices, Inverse and Rank of Matrix 213
,■=
1.
ECHELON FORM AND ROW-REDUCED ECHELON FORM OF A MATRIX
matrix A is said to be in Echelon form if
./(i The first non-zero element in each row, called its leading entry, is 1. However, if it is not 1 we
scale the row to make its leading entry 1.
v(ii) In any two successive rows ith and (i + 1)th that do not consist entirely of zeros, thc1!adin
element in the (1 + 1)th row lies to the right of the leading element in ith row.
Any row or rows that consist entirely of zeros, lie at the bottom of the matrix.
The matrix A is said to be in row-reduced echelon form if, in addition to conditions (i) to (iii),
it is also true that

(iv) In a column that contains the leading entry of a row, all the other elements are zero.
In essence, it means that a matrix A is in echelon form if the first non-zero entry in any row is 1
and the entry appears to the right of the first non-zero entry in the row above and all rows of zeros lie
at the bottom of the matrix. Furthermore, matrix A is in row-reduced echelon form if, in addition to these
conditions, the first non zero entryinany row is the only non-zero entry in the column containing that
entry.
For example, the matrices
1 1 1 1
1 0 2 5 0 0 1 3
0 0 1 0 and 0 0 0 1 are in echelon form
LO 0000
0 0 0 0

and the
The process of reducing a matrix to echelon form and to rove-reduced echelon form, will be more
1 5 , 1 0 0 1 0 2 0
Clear after 0 4 following0example.
undertaking 7
0 1 1 0 are all in row-reduced echelon form.
0 7 0 3
2 0 1
and
0 0 0 0 1 c===.-
0 1 0 1 1
0 0 0 0
1

MOM
is, applying
and 2, that
to its echelon form and its row-reduced echelon ferny 1/1°14M10114: Interchanging rows 1
Reduce the matrix
R1 4-► R2
0 1 2 0 32
4 8 2 4 1
A- 2 4 2 2 1
-
2 2 4 8 2
4 0 I 2 0 3 6 now1 5applying R I --) R 1 )
A
(

3 1 2 4
2 2 1 3
214 Advanced Engineenng Mathematics
1 2 4 1 2
1 2 0 3
(applying R 3 -÷ R 3 - R 1 and R4 --+ R4 - R1 )
0 2 4 2 2
3 6 1 5
1
2 4 1 2
1 2 3
1 (applying R4 --> R4 R2)
0 0 0 0
1 1 2 3
0 1 _
2 4
0
2 2
_ 10 0 3
0
0
0 0 1 0
1 0
and this matrix is in echelon form. Having obtained the echelon form of the given matrix, we use it to
get the row-reduced echelon form. Thus, we have
1 2 4 1 2
0 1 2 0 3
A 0 0 0 1 0 (apply R 1 -> R 1 - 2R 2 )

_ 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 1 _-4
0 1 2 0 3
0 0 0 1 0 (apply R 1 -4 R 1 - R 3 )

0 0 0 0 0_
1 0 0 0 -4
0 1 2 0 3
Ans.
0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0
and this matrix is now in its row-reduced echelon form.

INVERSE OF A MATRIX BY GAUSS-JORDAN METHOD


The method can be stated as follows:
"The elementary row operations which reduce a given matrix A (n k n) to a unit matrix 1 (ri i tL

when applied to the unit matrix i n , give the inverse of A."


Let the successive row operations which reduce the given square matrix A (n x n) to I. result from
the premultiplication of A by the elementary matrices R 1 , R 2 , ..., R k , so that
R k R k R k _ 2 ... R 2 R 1 A 1
-

Post multiplying this by A 1 , we obtain (R k R A


- R 2 R 1 A) A I IA
or (RkRk R 2 R 1 ) (AA I )= A-1 Or
RkRk R 2 R 1 1- A 1

or A =RA,Rii...R2Ril.
wows, Determinants, Hermitian and Skew-Hermitian Matrices, Inverse and Rank of Matrix 215

Thus, to find A-1 we write the augmented matrix [A, I] where I is the unit matrix of the same order
as that of A. Then perform the same row operations on both A and 1, till such time when A reduces

to I, the other matrix represents A. However, this method fails when det (A) = 0.
This can be symbolically written as (A/1) elementary
(1/B).
row operation
(a) Applying Gauss-Jordan technique, find the inverse of the matrix
1 2 3
A= 2 4 5 [GGSIPU I Sem End Term 2013]
3 5 6
_,

(b) By elementary transformations find the inverse of 1 3 5


3 2 4
[GGSIPU I Sem End Term January 2011] 5 4 2

12 3I1
SOLUTION: (a) The augmented matrix [A, 1] = 2 4 5 0
0 0
356I0 1 1
0
Applying R 2 - 2R 1 and R 3 — 3R 1 , we get 0 1_

1 2 3 1 0 0
[A, 1] - 0 0 -1 -2 1 0
0 -1 -3, j -3 0 1
Next, applying R2 4-÷ R3 and R2 —› —R2, we get
1 2 31 1 0 0
0 1 3 3 0 -1
0 0 -1 -2 1 0
Now, applying R1 R I - 2R 2 and R 3

R 3 , we get

1 0 -31 -5 0 2-
0 1 3 3 0 -1
0 0 1 j 2 -1 0
Finally, applying R1 R + 3R3 and R2 R2 — 3R3, we get
0 0 1 1 -3 2
0 1 0 -3 3 -1
0 0 11 2 -1 0_
1 -3 2
Hence A -3 3 - I Ans.
2 -1 0
t f ill r 1
ilw i
216 Advancec baii, ern•ut

1 0 0-
[1 3 5] and /= 0 1 0, then
(b) Let A= 3 2 0 0 1

1 3 5 1 0 0
Al = 2 4 0 1 0
(Applying R2 -> R2 - 3R, and R3-> R3 - 5R1 on both A and I, we get I
3 4 2 0 0 1

1
3 5 I 0 0
= 0 - 7 -11 -3 1 0 (Applying R3-> R3 - 2R2)
0 -11 -23 -5 0 1
_

1 3 51 1 00
= 0 -7 -11 I
-3 10 (Next applying R i --R 1 -R 3 and R2-> R2 2R3)
0 3 -1 1 -2 1

10 6
0 2 -1
= 0 -1 -13 -
1 -3 2 (Now
applying R3
-> R3 +
3R2)
0 3 -1
1 -2 1

10 6
0 2 -1
= 0 -1
-13
1 0 6 0 2 -1 1 0 6 0 80 -40
= 0 1 13 1 3 -2 = 1 0 1 13 40 120 -80
40
00 1 2 11 -7 0 0 1 2 11 -7
_40 40 40_

(Next applying R1-4 - 6R3 and R2-> R2- 13R

1 0 0 -12 14 2 -12 14 2
1 A-1= — 1
0 0 1 -23 11 -23
40 40 11 Ans.
0 1 1 4 11 -7 4 11 -
2
-1 -
3 2
(Nex
t
appl
ying
R2-
3-R2
and
R3-
>-
R3)
_0
0 -
40 -
2 -
11 7

_
I 0 6 0
2 -1
= 0 1 13
1 3 -2 (Now
applying R3 -*
—1 R3)
0 0 40 2
I1 -7
i

40
z
, Determinants, Hermitian and Skew-Hermitian Matrices, Inverse and Rank of Matrix 217

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIUsing the method of elementary row transformations to compute the inverse of


1 2 5
2 31
[ [GGSIPU I Sem End Term 2007]
-1 1 1_
1 2 5 1 0 0-
SourrION: Let A= 2 3 1 and 13 = 0 1 0

1 1 1 0 0 1
We apply row transformations on A as well as 1 simultaneously till A becomes 1 and
fate of I will be A -1 .
Applying R2 —+ R2 + 2R1 and R3 —> R3 + R1, we get
1 2 5- 1 0 0
A 0 -1 -9 and 1 -2 1 0 Now applying R3 --> R3 + 3R2
0 3 6 10 1
1 2 5 1 0 0
-

A- 0 -1 -9 and 1- -2 1 0 Now applying R2 -> — R2, R3 --> — R3


0 0 -21 -5 3 1

1 2 10 0
5
A- 0 1 9 and 2 -1 0
0 0 1 • 5 -3 -1
21 21 21_
Next applying R2 —+ R2 — 9R3 and R, -+ R, -

-4 15 5
21 21 21
-4 15 5
1 2 0 -3 6 9
A- 0 1 0 / 21 21 21 21 -3 6 9
0 0 l 5 -3 -1 5 -3 -1
21 21

Finally applying R 1 -+ R I - 2R 2 , we get

2 1 -13
2 3 -13 - 1 0 0 3 9
- 6
A 0 1 0 ,
Ans. 3 -1
21 0 0 1 -3 6 9 -3
-
5
5 -3 L

You might also like