Introduction To Pharmacovigilance - Docx Basicccc
Introduction To Pharmacovigilance - Docx Basicccc
UNIT 1 Pharmacovigilance
1.1 Introduction
2.1 Introduction
2.3 ArisG
2.5 PvNET
2.6 repClinical
2.7 PV Works
2.8 VigiFlow
2.9 PharmaLex
03 Summary
04 References
UNIT 1
PHARMACOVIGILANCE
1.1. Introduction:
Pharmacovigilance is the pharmacological science relating to the detection,
assessment, understanding and prevention of adverse effects, particularly long term
and short term side effects of medicines. Generally speaking Pharmacovigilance is the
science of collecting, monitoring, researching, assessing and evaluating information
from healthcare providers and patients on the adverse effects of medications,
biological products, herbalism and traditional medicines with a view to:
“A response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and which occurs as doses
normally used…for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, of therapy of disease, or for the
modification of physiological function.”
Pharmacovigilance Processes:
Spontaneous Reporting: Spontaneous reporting involves healthcare
professionals and patients voluntarily reporting ADRs to regulatory authorities or
pharmaceutical companies. These reports form the backbone of PV systems,
enabling the detection of safety signals.
Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs): Pharmaceutical companies must
submit PSURs to regulatory authorities at regular intervals. These reports
summarize the safety profile of a drug and any new safety information that has
emerged since the last report.
Pharmacovigilance Databases: Databases like the WHO Global Individual Case
Safety Reports (ICSRs) database, EudraVigilance (EU), and FAERS (USA) store
ADR data, facilitating signal detection and assessment.
Pharmacovigilance in Clinical Trials:
Pharmacovigilance is integral to clinical trials, ensuring the safety of participants
through:
Safety Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of adverse events.
Data Reporting: Reporting safety data to regulatory agencies.
Risk Management: Implementing risk mitigation strategies
Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): ADRs are unintended and harmful effects
that occur at normal drug doses used for prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy. They
can range from mild side effects to severe, life-threatening conditions. PV
systems aim to detect and assess these reactions to mitigate their impact on
patients.
Signal Detection: Signal detection involves identifying new or unknown ADRs
from various data sources, such as spontaneous reports, clinical trials, and
medical literature. Tools like disproportionality analysis and data mining
techniques help in identifying potential safety signals.
Risk Management: Risk management in PV involves developing strategies to
minimize the risk of ADRs. This includes risk communication, where information
about drug safety is disseminated to healthcare professionals and patients, and
risk minimization measures, like restricted distribution programs for high-risk
drugs.
FDA (Food and Drug Administration): Regulates drug safety in the United
States.
EMA (European Medicines Agency): Regulates drug safety in the European
Union.
CDSCO (Central Drugs Standard Control Organization): Regulates drug
safety in India
Challenges in Pharmacovigilance:
Under-reporting: Many adverse events go unreported.
Data Quality: Ensuring the accuracy and completeness of data.
Global Harmonization: Standardizing pharmacovigilance practices across
countries.
Technological Advancements: Adapting to new technologies and data sources.
Future of Pharmacovigilance:
Big Data and AI: Leveraging big data and artificial intelligence for better data
analysis and risk detection.
Personalized Medicine: Tailoring pharmacovigilance practices to individual
patient profiles.
Patient Engagement: Increasing patient involvement in reporting adverse events
and safety monitoring.
1.2. History and Evolution
1.2.1. Early Beginnings:
The concept of pharmacovigilance began to take shape in the mid-19th century. One
of the earliest recorded incidents that highlighted the need for drug safety monitoring
was the death of Hannah Greener in 1848. She died after receiving chloroform
anesthesia during a minor surgical procedure. This incident prompted investigations
into the safety of chloroform and other drug.
Key Milestones:
1968: Establishment of the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring.
1970s: Introduction of spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare
professionals and patients report ADRs voluntarily.
1980s: Development of regional pharmacovigilance programs, such as the
European Medicines Agency (EMA) in Europe and the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) in the United States.
2000s: Introduction of risk management plans and periodic safety update reports
(PSURs) to ensure continuous monitoring of drug safety.
2010s: Expansion of pharmacovigilance programs to developing countries, with
initiatives like the Pharmacovigilance Program of India.
Conclusion:
The history and evolution of pharmacovigilance reflect the ongoing efforts to ensure
drug safety and protect public health. From its early beginnings to the sophisticated
systems of today, pharmacovigilance has become an essential component of the
healthcare system, continuously adapting to new challenges and advancements in
drug therapy.
1.3. Types of Pharmacovigilance:
a. Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS)
b. Active Surveillance
c. Targeted Spontaneous Reporting
d. Cohort Studies
e. Case-Control Studies
f. Pharmacovigilance Audits
Strength Weakness
Real-World Data: The SRS Underreporting: One of the major
provides valuable information from limitations of the SRS is the issue of
real-life clinical settings, which can underreporting. Many adverse events
be more representative of actual drug go unreported, which can lead to
use compared to controlled clinical incomplete data and delayed
trials. detection of safety issues.
Wide Coverage: It can capture a Bias: The system may be subject to
wide range of adverse events, reporting bias, where certain types of
including rare and long-term effects adverse events are more likely to be
that may not be detected in clinical reported than others.
trials.
Lack of Detail: Reports may lack
Early Detection: The system can sufficient detail to fully assess
help detect safety issues early in the causality and severity, making it
drug's lifecycle, allowing for timely challenging to draw definitive
regulatory action and risk mitigation. conclusions.
Example:
FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): The FDA uses targeted
spontaneous reporting to focus on specific drugs or adverse events, enhancing the
detection of safety signals and ensuring timely regulatory actions.
BENEFITS CHALLENGES
Improved Detection: Focusing on Resource Intensive: Implementing
specific targets allows for more TSR requires dedicated resources,
efficient detection of rare or serious including personnel, technology, and
ADRs. funding.
Enhanced Patient Safety: By Reporting Bias: Encouraging
identifying and addressing potential reporting for specific targets may
safety issues, TSR contributes to the lead to reporting bias, where certain
overall safety of pharmaceutical types of ADRs are overrepresented.
products.
Data Quality: Ensuring the accuracy
Timely Regulatory Actions: Early and completeness of the data
detection of safety issues enables collected is crucial for effective
timely regulatory actions to protect analysis and signal detection.
patient safety.
Advantage Disadvantage
Representative Populations: They Confounding Factors: There may
include a broader, more be confounding variables that affect
representative sample of patients the outcomes, making it challenging
compared to controlled clinical trials. to establish a direct causal
relationship.
Multiple Outcomes: Cohort studies
can assess multiple outcomes and Causal Relationships: Cohort
long-term effects studies cannot definitively establish
causality like randomized controlled
Real-World Evidence: They provide
trials.
insights into how a drug performs in
everyday clinical practice, which Resource Intensive: Conducting
might not be captured in clinical cohort studies requires significant
trials. resources, including time, personnel,
and funding.
1.3.E. Case Control Studies:
These are a type of observational study commonly used in pharmacovigilance to
investigate the association between an exposure (such as a drug) and an outcome
(such as an adverse drug reaction). These studies are particularly useful for studying
rare diseases or outcomes.
Advantage Disadvantage
Efficiency: These studies are Confounding: There is a risk of
relatively quick and inexpensive to confounding, where other factors
conduct, especially for rare may be associated with both the
outcomes. exposure and the outcome, leading to
biased results.
Feasibility: They are feasible for
studying diseases or outcomes with Recall Bias: Cases may remember
long latency periods. their exposures differently than
controls, leading to biased results.
Hypothesis Generation: Case-
control studies are useful for Causality: These studies cannot
generating hypotheses that can be establish causality; they can only
tested in future studies. suggest associations.
Example:
Cases: Patients who experienced severe bleeding while taking the anticoagulant.
Controls: Patients who took the anticoagulant but did not experience severe bleeding.
Comparison: The exposure to the anticoagulant and other potential risk factors are
compared between the two groups to determine if there is an association with severe
bleeding.
Regulatory Guidelines:
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) provides guidelines on good
pharmacovigilance practices (GVP), including Module IV on pharmacovigilance
audits. These guidelines outline the structures, processes, and quality management
practices required for effective pharmacovigilance audits.
Advantage Disadvantage
Enhanced Safety: Audits help Resource Intensive: Conducting
identify and address potential safety thorough audits requires significant
issues, improving patient safety. resources, including time, personnel,
and funding.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensures
that pharmacovigilance activities Data Quality: Ensuring the accuracy
comply with regulatory and completeness of data collected
requirements. during audits is crucial for effective
assessments.
Continuous Improvement: Provides
insights into areas for improvement,
fostering a culture of continuous
improvement in pharmacovigilance
practices.
Conclusion:
Pharmacovigilance audits are a critical component of ensuring the safety and efficacy
of pharmaceutical products. By systematically evaluating pharmacovigilance
activities, audits help maintain high standards of practice and protect patient health.
UNIT 2
SOFTWARES USED IN
PHARMACOVIGILANCE
2.1. INTRODUCTION
Software solutions are essential in pharmacovigilance for several key reasons:
Efficiency: Automation of data entry, processing, and reporting tasks significantly
reduces the time and effort required to manage adverse event reports. This allows
pharmacovigilance teams to handle larger volumes of data more efficiently.
Accuracy: Automated systems help ensure the accuracy and consistency of data entry
and reporting. This reduces the risk of human errors that can occur with manual
processes.
Regulatory Compliance: Pharmacovigilance software is designed to comply with
global regulatory standards, such as E2B, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, and EMA guidelines.
This ensures that all safety data is managed and reported according to the latest
regulatory requirements.
Data Integration: These systems can integrate data from various sources, including
clinical trials, post-marketing surveillance, and literature, providing a comprehensive
view of drug safety.
Real-Time Monitoring: Software solutions enable real-time monitoring and analysis
of adverse event data, allowing for quicker detection of potential safety issues and
faster responses to regulatory requirement.
Cost-Effectiveness: By automating various pharmacovigilance processes, software
solutions can help reduce operational costs associated with manual data entry and
reporting.
Reporting and Analytics: These tools provide robust reporting and analytics
capabilities, allowing organizations to generate detailed safety reports, conduct trend
analysis, and make data-driven decisions.
Scalability: These systems can easily scale to accommodate increasing volumes of
safety data as organizations grow and new products are launched.
ARISg is trusted by over 300 companies worldwide for managing their critical drug
safety data. It helps reduce safety risks for drugs, devices, vaccines, and combination
products by improving case processing workflows and integrating with other systems
2.4. Oracle AERS
This is a comprehensive pharmacovigilance software solution designed to manage and
analyze adverse event reports for pharmaceuticals, biologics, vaccines, and medical
devices.
Biopharmaceuticals, vaccines, medical device companies and Contract Research
Organisations (CROs) are constantly challenged with meeting time-critical regulatory
requirements using limited resources. They must identify and mange safety events
before they become issues, and they need to maintain strict compliance with evolving
regulations. To manage critical business processes, they require clear visibility into
their data.
Oracle AERS provides a single global solution with powerful automation and
productivity tools to meet the challenges of managing your worldwide safety
information. Oracle AERS supports the capture, management, reporting and
analysis of serious adverse event and product compliance cases for all medical
products including drugs, medical devices, vaccines, biologics and gene therapies
from all clinical and spontaneous sources.
Oracle AERS was designed by industry professionals to be easy to use for all
users. The intuitive interface provides powerful functionality at the touch of a
button. Each subsystem includes a navigator panel to provide overall context. The
AERS graphical user interface provides and interactive presentation of key case
information, allowing users to visualise the case elements and understand the
holistic case picture. Configuration and administration is performed through the
use of validated screens and simple end-user tools.
2.5. PvNET
PvNET is a a comprehensive pharmacovigilance solution and one of the leading
software used in pharmacovigilance with Adverse Event reporting, Adverse Drug
reaction (ADR) data management and regulatory reporting of ICSR (Individual Case
Safety Report) that goes beyond mere compliance. From early development through
post marketing, PvNET helps integrating the safety information, and thus helps users
to make critical decisions. PvNET is across the board drug safety successfully audited
against GMP standards, 21 CFR compliance and ICH E2B.
With repClinical you can capture adverse event data, generate regulatory reports
and exchange ICSRs with multiple regulatory bodies and business partners. All
this in a simple intuitive and efficient way.
repClinical provides clutter free screens and useful features to help generate
precise E2B reports easily.
You can create, modify and track cases in repClinical. Cases can be assigned to
other users for updation or review. Case data corresponds to data contained in
section B of the ICSR as described in Electronic Transmission of Individual Case
Safety Reports Message Specification.
In repClinical you can access case data – with a single click. This facilitates
quicker access of data without navigating through a menu. Also repClinical
performs a minimum data check for cases from early stages of data entry
Creating messages in reClinical is fast and easy. The messages can be archived
for future download. Also the message is automatically validated. You can also
upload and maintain ICSR acknowledgement message along with the transmitted
message. repClinical also maintains an Audit trail for all the data added, modified
or deleted. You can view a chronological sequence of audit records detailing al
changes done to any data in a human readable format.
Benefits:
a) Efficiency: repCLINICAL improves efficiency by automating various processes,
such as case intake, coding, and narrative generation.
b) Accuracy: The software ensures accuracy in reporting and case management
through built-in validation rules and standardized processes.
c) Compliance: repCLINICAL helps companies comply with global regulatory
standards, reducing the risk of non-compliance penalties.
d) Scalability: The software can handle rapidly increasing caseloads and adapt to
changing regulations, ensuring scalability for growing organizations.
e) Insights: repCLINICAL provides powerful analytics tools to uncover insights
from safety data, enabling faster and more informed decision-making.
f) Security: The software ensures secure access to safety data from anywhere,
which is crucial for global operations.
Use Cases:
Pharmaceutical Companies: repCLINICAL is widely used by pharmaceutical
companies to manage and report adverse events for their products.
Biotechnology Firms: Biotechnology firms use repCLINICAL to track and
manage adverse events related to their biologic products.
Medical Device Manufacturers: The software is also used by medical device
manufacturers to ensure the safety and efficacy of their devices.
Healthcare Organizations: Healthcare organizations use repCLINICAL to
report and manage adverse events for drugs and medical devices used in patient
care.
Conclusion
repCLINICAL is a versatile and powerful pharmacovigilance software solution
that helps companies manage safety data efficiently and ensure compliance with
global regulatory standards. Its advanced features and benefits make it an
essential tool for any organization involved in drug safety and pharmacovigilance.
2.7. PV Works
PVWorks is a comprehensive software solution designed to support
pharmacovigilance (PV) activities in the pharmaceutical industry. Pharmacovigilance
is the science and activities related to the detection, assessment, understanding, and
prevention of adverse effects or any other drug-related problems.
6. Chai, W. (2021, February). big data analytics. TechTarget. Retrieved September 13,
2021, from https://searchbusinessanalytics.techtarget.com/defi nition/big-data-
analytics.
7. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. (2020, April 2). Postmarketing
surveillance programs. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved October 3,
2021,from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/surveillance/postmarketing-surveillance-
programs.