MGT 530 - 17380

Operations Management

Module 2: Productivity Problem Analysis

100 pts

Student ID: G230003240

Abdullah Albakr

9/24/2024
 Managing the Service Life Cycle for Internal Customers

When a company decides to introduce a new service aimed at its internal

customers—typically employees or departments within the organization—the process of

managing the service life cycle (SLC) undergoes significant alterations. The service

lifecycle comprises four key phases: introduction, growth, maturity, and decline. The

internal nature of customers influences each phase differently, with unique implications

for organizational culture, resistance to change, feedback mechanisms, and resource

utilization.

Service Introduction: Organizational Culture and Resistance to Change

The introduction phase is critical, as it sets the stage for how the new service is
perceived and utilized by internal customers. In this context, organizational culture plays
a pivotal role. A strong, positive culture that encourages innovation and collaboration can
facilitate the acceptance of new services. Employees are more likely to embrace change if
they feel aligned with the company's values and see the service as beneficial to their roles
(Schein, 2010). Conversely, a culture resistant to change can impede the service's
introduction. Employees may be skeptical about the need for new services, particularly if
they perceive them as a threat to established workflows or job security (Kotter, 1996).

Moreover, internal customers often have pre-existing relationships with the

organization that can complicate the introduction of new services. Unlike external
customers, internal customers are typically more invested in the company's success and
may possess a deeper understanding of its operations. This familiarity can lead to
resistance, especially if the new service disrupts established processes. Therefore, clear
communication and change management strategies are essential to mitigate resistance.
Leaders should engage employees early in the process, soliciting their input and
demonstrating how the service aligns with both organizational goals and individual needs
(Cameron & Green, 2015).

To effectively manage the introduction phase, organizations can consider utilizing

pilot programs or beta testing. By rolling out the service to a smaller group of employees
first, the company can gather initial feedback and make necessary adjustments before a

2
wider implementation. This approach not only builds confidence among employees but
also champions early adopters who can influence their peers positively (Baker et al.,
2006). Additionally, creating a clear value proposition that outlines the benefits of the
new service—such as improved efficiency or enhanced job satisfaction—can help to
generate enthusiasm and minimize skepticism.

Furthermore, training sessions and workshops can play a crucial role in the
introduction phase. These initiatives can educate employees about the new service,
addressing any concerns they may have and demonstrating how to use it effectively.
Involving managers and team leaders in these training sessions can help reinforce the
importance of the service and encourage a culture of support and adaptability (Kotter,
1996).

Service Growth: Feedback Mechanisms and Resource Utilization

Once a new service has been introduced, the growth phase hinges on the
development of strong internal customer relationships and effective feedback
mechanisms. The internal nature of customers means that companies can leverage
closer relationships to facilitate a more responsive and adaptive service offering.
Feedback loops are typically more accessible in an internal setting; employees can
provide immediate insights on the service’s effectiveness, which can be
invaluable for iterative improvements (Grönroos, 2007).

Establishing robust feedback mechanisms is crucial for fostering

continuous improvement. Internal customers are more likely to share honest
feedback, given their vested interest in the organization's success. This
engagement can take various forms, from surveys and focus groups to informal
discussions. The information gathered can guide adjustments to the service,
ensuring it meets the evolving needs of users (Drucker, 2007).

Moreover, utilizing cross-departmental teams for service development can

enhance growth. By incorporating diverse perspectives from various departments,
organizations can better understand the nuanced needs of different internal
customers and design a service that truly meets those needs. This collaborative
approach not only enriches the service offering but also fosters a sense of
ownership among employees, which can enhance overall engagement and
satisfaction (Tidd & Bessant, 2018).

3
 In addition, organizations should consider implementing a mentorship
program to support employees in utilizing the new service. Pairing experienced
employees with those who may be struggling can encourage knowledge sharing
and build a community around the service. This not only fosters a collaborative
environment but also reduces the learning curve associated with new systems
(Brown & Isaacs, 2005).

Resource utilization also differs when servicing internal customers.

Organizations can leverage existing human resources, technology, and
infrastructure to support the new service, potentially reducing costs associated
with external service delivery. However, this requires careful planning and
coordination to avoid overburdening employees who may already be managing
numerous responsibilities. Effective resource allocation ensures that the new
service does not detract from employees' core functions while maximizing its
value (Pine & Gilmore, 1999).

To further optimize resource utilization, organizations can explore

automation and technology integration. Streamlining processes through software
solutions or apps can enhance efficiency and minimize the administrative burden
on employees. This tech-savvy approach not only improves the service experience
but also demonstrates the organization’s commitment to supporting its internal
customers through innovation (Hammer & Champy, 2009).

Service Maturity and Decline: Maintaining Engagement and Evaluating

Performance

As the service matures, maintaining employee engagement becomes increasingly

important. Internal services can suffer from a lack of visibility and perceived value over

time, especially if employees do not actively utilize them or if they become complacent

about their benefits. To combat this, organizations must continually demonstrate the

service's relevance, adapting it to meet changing business needs and workforce dynamics.

This ongoing commitment requires regular evaluation and communication strategies to

highlight successes and share user testimonials (Zeithaml et al., 2018).

4
 One effective strategy during the maturity phase is to implement regular check-ins

or touchpoints with employees. These could include quarterly reviews or updates that

celebrate achievements related to the service, share success stories, and invite further

feedback for improvements. Engaging employees in this manner fosters a sense of

community and keeps the service at the forefront of their minds (Dawson et al., 2016).

Moreover, incorporating gamification elements into the service can enhance

engagement during the maturity phase. By introducing features that reward usage or

achievement, organizations can create a sense of excitement around the service,

encouraging ongoing participation (Deterding et al., 2011). This not only keeps the

service top-of-mind but also helps in developing a community around it, further

embedding it into the organizational culture.

During the decline phase, organizations face the challenge of either revitalizing

the service or phasing it out. Internal services often have unique considerations, as

employees may develop attachment to long-standing services, leading to emotional

resistance to change. Organizations should approach this phase with sensitivity, involving

employees in discussions about the service's future and exploring alternative solutions

that could better serve their needs (Kotter, 1996). This inclusive approach not only

enhances transparency but can also lead to innovative ideas for service enhancement or

replacement, ensuring that internal customers feel valued and heard.

5
 Additionally, organizations can consider conducting a SWOT analysis (Strengths,

Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) of the service during the decline phase. This

analytical approach allows organizations to identify areas for improvement and potential

opportunities for revitalization. Engaging employees in this process not only garners their

insights but also fosters a sense of ownership over the future of the service (Baker et al.,

2006).

Conclusion

In summary, the internal nature of customers profoundly influences the

management of the service life cycle. The dynamics of organizational culture and
resistance to change shape the introduction of services, while the close relationships and
feedback mechanisms available within the organization facilitate growth. As services
mature, maintaining engagement through innovative strategies and active evaluation is
critical to ensure their ongoing relevance. Ultimately, a thoughtful, employee-centered
approach to managing the service life cycle can lead to successful outcomes that enhance
both employee satisfaction and organizational effectiveness.

6
 References

-Stevenson, W. (2021). Operations management (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Irwin.
-Baker, W. E., & Pollock, T. (2006). The Role of Social Capital in the Development of
Trust in the Internal Market. The Journal of Business and Economic Studies,
12(1), 45-63.

-Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The World Café: Shaping Our Futures Through
Conversations That Matter. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

-Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2015). Making Sense of Change Management: A Complete
Guide to the Models, Tools and Techniques of Organizational Change. Kogan
Page.

-Dawson, J. F., & McLean, C. (2016). The Role of Employee Voice in the Management of
Change: A Study of the 2005 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. British
Journal of Industrial Relations, 54(4), 879-902.

-Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From Game Design Elements
to Gamefulness: defining "Gamification." In Proceedings of the 15th
International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media
Environments (pp. 9-15). ACM.

-Drucker, P. F. (2007). The Effective Executive: The Definitive Guide to Getting the
Right Things Done. HarperBusiness.

-Grönroos, C. (2007). Service Management and Marketing: Customer Management in

Service Competition. Wiley.

-Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (2009). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for
Business Revolution. HarperBusiness.

-Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.

-Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre &
Every Business a Stage. Harvard Business Review Press.

-Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.

-Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2018).