0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views12 pages

Graph Description Examples

Uploaded by

wintddeung1510
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views12 pages

Graph Description Examples

Uploaded by

wintddeung1510
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

BAR CHART

The bar graph illustrates the relative percentage


contributions made by the agricultural, industrial
and service sectors to the Indian economy between
1960 and 2000.
Over the whole time period, the significance of
agriculture declined steadily while services grew in
importance decade by decade. A different patterned
emerged for industry, which initially showed a
slowly increasing percentage but then plateaued
from 1980 onwards.
In 1960, agriculture contributed by far the highest
percentage of GDP, peaking at 62%, but it then
dropped in steady increments to a low of 12% in
2000. The service sector, on the other hand, had a
relatively minor impact on the economy in 1960. This
situation changed gradually at first, then its
percentage contribution jumped from 28% to 43%
between 1980 and 1990. By 2000 it matched the high
point reached by agriculture in 1960, showing a
reversal in the overall trend.
Industry remained a steady contributor to India’s
wealth throughout the period. As a sector, it grew
marginally from 16% in 1960 to exactly a quarter in
1980 then remained static for the next two decades,
maintaining a constant share of the overall GDP.
(188 words)
LINE GRAPH
PIE CHART
TABLE
MIXED CHART
PRACTICE EXERCISE
The graphs below show the percentage of math graduates and other graduates
who got full-time job after graduating from a university in Australia, and also show
the average salary of both these types of graduates, from 2004 to 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the employment
rates while the table shows average salaries of math
graduates and other graduates in Australia from
2004 to 2012.
Overall, math graduates had a higher employment
rate than other graduates throughout the period.
While both groups saw salary increases, math
graduates consistently earned more, especially after
2006.
In terms of full-time employment, math graduates
maintained a relatively stable rate, starting at around
80% in 2004, peaking at 85% in 2008, and slightly
declining to 78% by 2012. In contrast, the
employment rate for other graduates started lower at
65% in 2004, reached the highest rate of 85% in
2006, but then saw a sharper drop, falling to below
70% in 2012.
Regarding salaries, both groups had the same
starting salary of $41,000 in 2004. However, math
graduates experienced a more significant salary
increase, reaching $56,000 by 2012, while other
graduates saw a smaller rise, with their salaries
reaching $51,000 in the same year.
(160 words)

You might also like