Active Directory Revision
Active Directory Revision
Suman Das
Questions & Answers
Q2. What are the Domain Function Level and Forest Functional Level in 200/2003 server?
Ans.: Domain and forest functionality, introduced in Windows Server 2003 Active Directory,
provides a way to enable domain- or forest-wide Active Directory features within your network
environment. Different levels of domain functionality and forest functionality are available
depending on your environment.
If all domain controllers in your domain or forest are running Windows Server 2003 and the
functional level is set to Windows Server 2003, all domain- and forest-wide features are
available. When Windows NT 4.0 or Windows 2000 domain controllers are included in your
domain or forest with domain controllers running Windows Server 2003, Active Directory
features are limited.
Q3. What is Mixed Mode and Native Mode?
Ans.: Mixed mode in Windows 2000 means that your Windows 2000 server functions in a
manner that allows it to work with older versions of Windows NT. Specifically, in mixed mode,
Windows 2000 can operate with Windows NT 4.0 servers and Windows NT 4, Windows 9x, and
Windows 3.x workstations. When Windows 2000 is running in mixed mode, it behaves and
communicates in a way that earlier versions of Windows NT understand. As far as they’re
concerned, the Windows 2000 server looks just like a regular Windows NT 4 Primary Domain
Controller (PDC).
Native mode, it can no longer replicate changes to and from Windows NT BDCs. Nor can you
add any additional Windows NT servers to your network. Any Windows NT Workstation or 9x
clients you have will have to use the Active Directory client to access files on the Windows 2000
server.
Ans.: Sites in Active Directory represent the physical structure, or topology, of your network.
Active Directory uses topology information, stored as site and site link objects in the directory, to
build the most efficient replication topology. You use Active Directory Sites and Services to
define sites and site links. A site is a set of well-connected subnets. Sites differ from domains;
sites represent the physical structure of your network, while domains represent the logical
structure of your organization.
Q6. What is the difference between Additional Domain Controller and Child Domain
Controller?
A child DC would be either the first or an additional DC added to a child domain, i.e., a domain
that has a parent domain in the same
forest
Ans.: LDAP is a communication protocol designed for use on TCP/IP networks. LDAP defines
how a directory client can access a directory server and how the client can perform directory
operations and share directory data. LDAP standards are established by working groups of the
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Active Directory implements the LDAP attribute draft
specifications and the IETF standards for LDAP versions 2 and 3.
Ans.: A global catalog is a domain controller that stores a copy of all Active Directory objects in
a forest. The global catalog stores a full copy of all objects in the directory for its host domain
and a partial copy of all objects for all other domains in the forest.
Q12. What is Trust Relationship? What are the trust types supported by Win 2003?
Ans.: A trust Relationship is a relationship established between domains that enable users in one
domain to be authenticated by a domain controller in the other domain. Trust relationships in
Windows NT are different than in Windows 2000 and Windows Server 2003 operating systems.
Ans.: Groups are containers that contain user and computer objects within them as members.
When security permissions are set for a group in the Access Control List on a resource, all
members of that group receive those permissions. Domain Groups enable centralized
administration in a domain. All domain groups are created on a domain controller.
Ans.:
Q16. Why Infrastructure Master and Global Catalogue should not be placed in the same
domain?
Ans.: Infrastructure Master and Global Catalogue should not be placed in the same domain
because, the infrastructure master finds data out-of-date and then requests update data from the
global catalogue server. If both roles reside on the same domain controller, then the infrastructure
master will not be able to function because it’ll never find any out-of-date data since the global
catalogue is always up-to-date.
Ans.: We need Active directory to stores information about objects on a network and make this
information available to users and network administrators.
Ans.: Schema is a collection of database objects. A schema is owned by a database user and has
the same name as that user. Schema objects are logical structures created by
users to contain, or reference, their data. Schema objects include structures like tables, views,
and indexes.
Q23. What is DFS? What is the difference between Stand Alone DFS and Domain DFS?
Ans.: With Distributed File System (DFS), system administrators can make it easy for users to
access and manage files that are physically distributed across a network. With DFS, you can
make files distributed across multiple servers appear to users as if they reside in one place on the
network. Users no longer need to know and specify the actual physical location of files in order
to access them.
Q24. What are the FMSO roles?
Ans.: Flexible Single Master of Operation (FSMO), or just single master operation or operations
master, is a feature of Microsoft's Active Directory (AD). As of 2005, the term FSMO has been
deprecated in favor of operations masters.
Q25. Why are the called flexible and why single master?
Ans.: FSMOs are specialized domain controller (DC) tasks, used where standard data transfer
and update methods are inadequate. AD normally relies on multiple peer DCs, each with a copy
of the AD database, being synchronized by multi-master replication. The tasks which are not
suited to multi-master replication, and are viable only with a single-master database, are the
FSMOs.
Q26. What is the basic difference between Additional Domain Controller and Backup
Domain Controller?
Ans.:
Microsoft's Active Directory relies heavily on DNS. DNS is used to find important resources
like domain controllers. Because these in turn are needed to authenticate users, Windows 2000,
XP or 2003 will not work properly without a correctly configured DNS.
Unfortunately, Microsoft has decided to use very new standards in it's DNS. The Windows
2000/XP/2003 environment relies on options like dynamic DNS and - to some degree - Unicode
characters in DNS records. While most of this are open standards, they are only seldom used
outside of the Microsoft environment. So in reality, only the Microsoft DNS server will ensure
proper and hassle-free DNS operation. And if I say Microsoft DNS I mean the one that comes
with Windows 2000 or newer operating systems - the Windows NT 4 DNS server won't help
much.
This article describes Microsoft's approach, the issues with that and how to work around them.
What is DDNS?
So how do these (numerous) entries find their way to the DNS database. The typical answer so
far was: a system administrator has manually entered them into it. If you have a look at the
number of entries that Active Directory depends on - and their change rate - not a really practical
answer. Especially if you take a look at all clients (e. g. Windows 2000 Professional or Windows
XP Professional) that of course need to be registered in DNS, too.
Clearly, a solution needs to be found to do it automatically. Fortunately, there is DDNS, the
"dynamic" DNS. That standard enables systems to automatically enter their DNS records into the
server's database themselves. For example, a newly installed Windows 2000/2003 server
registers it's IP addresses into DDNS as well as the SRV-records for any services running on it.
Manual entries need not to be made.
Sound like a perfect solution? Well, what on this world is perfect... First of all, the number of
DNS servers supporting DDNS is limited (especially the number of these ones working well...).
Secondly, and that is even harder, DDNS has a number of security weaknesses. So you are
typically limited in you options and will carefully evaluate if you would like to have DDNS
running as your Internet (external) DNS server.
But beware - DDNS is really a life-safer in the Active Directory context and its problems can be
worked around. Practically, we recommend using the Windows 2000 DDNS server instead of
any third party product. Fortunately that server can neatly be integrated into existing DNS
infrastructures. Just ensure that Windows 2000, XP, 2003 or other Active Directory systems only
use DDNS servers. Theoretically, you can also use a non-dynamic DNS server (that ones with
the manual database entries). But we recommend this option only if you absolutely do not know
how to fill all of that spare time...
The screenshot shows a typical Active Directory server setup: that server is working as a DDNS
server as well and its preferred DNS server points to itself. So it will be able to register its DNS
records and query them successfully. By the way: all dialogs say "DNS" - read it as "DDNS" and
you will have less trouble.
In many scenarios, people even have tried this setup but than lost Internet name resolution - and
then switched back to their provider's DNS server. Don't let fool you: the setup here is correct. If
you can't resolve Internet names after doing so, please read our related article on how to fix that!
Important: if you install other Windows 2000/XP/2003 servers and workstations (Windows
Professional), make sure that these systems do use your own DDNS server as well. Otherwise,
they won't see the vital Active Directory information and as such will not work properly.
Also, ensure that you apply "old style" best DNS practices. Specifically, have at least two DNS
servers available. If you operate a single server and that server fails (or is just rebooted), no DNS
resolution is available at all. During such periods, network operation is seriously affected. If you
have at least two servers, that won't happen to you. In case the first one fails, the client
automatically switches to the second one. So the screenshot above is not really an ideal
configuration - the alternate DNS server is missing.
refer -http://www.adiscon.com/common/en/articles/active-directory-and-dns.php