Module IV - Understanding Impact & Context of Change
Module IV - Understanding Impact & Context of Change
10
Understanding the
impact and context of
change
Chapter learning objectives
Lead Component
E3: Recommend change (a) Assess impact of strategy
management techniques on organisation
and methodologies (b) Recommend change
management strategies
385
Understanding the impact and context of change
1 Introduction
Internal and external pressures make change inevitable. 'Adapt or die' is the
motto of almost every organisation. Some strive to meet the challenge by
leading those in the marketplace whilst others hide in niches, snapping at the
heels of the major players.
The key questions for all companies are not whether to change or not but
rather:
• What to change?
• What to change to?
• How to change successfully?
External triggers
Environmental pressure for change can be divided into two groups.
• General (indirect action) environmental factors – these can be identified
using the familiar PESTEL framework and
• Task (direct action) factors – these can be assessed using Porter's five
forces model.
386
Chapter 10
387
Understanding the impact and context of change
Internal triggers
The reasons for change within the organisation could span any functional area
of operation or level of control from strategic to operational.
Philosophy New ownership
New CEO
New initiative/management style
Reorganisation Takeover/merger
Divisional restructuring
Rationalisation/cost reduction
Personnel Promotions/transfers
Rules/procedures
Training/development
Conditions Location change
Outsourcing
Rosters/flexible working
Technology New procedures/systems
Changing information demands
Integration of roles
388
Chapter 10
3 Classifying change
Change can be classified by the extent (or scope) of the change required, and
the speed with which the change is to be achieved:
Types of change
389
Understanding the impact and context of change
Evolution or revolution?
Another way that evolution can be explained is by conceiving of the
organisation as a learning system. However, within incremental change
there may be a danger of strategic drift, because change is based on the
existing paradigm and routines of the organisation, even when
environmental or competitive pressure might suggest the need for more
fundamental change.
In selecting an approach to strategic change, most managers struggle
with the question of how bold they should be. On the one hand, they
usually realise that to fundamentally transform the organisation, a break
with the past is needed. To achieve strategic renewal it is essential to
turn away from the firm’s heritage and to start with a clean slate. On the
other hand, they also recognise the value of continuity, building on past
experiences, investments and loyalties. To achieve lasting strategic
renewal, people in the organisation will need time to learn, adapt and
grow into a new organisational reality.
The ‘window of opportunity’ for achieving a revolutionary strategic change
can be small for a number of reasons. Some of the most common
triggers are:
• competitive pressure – when a firm is under intense competitive
pressure and its market position starts to erode quickly, a rapid and
dramatic response might be the only approach possible. Especially
when the organisation threatens to slip into a downward spiral
towards insolvency, a bold turnaround can be the only option left to
the firm.
• regulatory pressure – firms can also be put under pressure by the
government or regulatory agencies to push through major changes
within a short period of time. Such externally imposed revolutions
can be witnessed among public sector organisations (e.g. hospitals
and schools) and highly regulated industries (e.g. utilities and
telecommunications), but in other sectors of the economy as well
(e.g. public health regulations). Some larger organisations will,
however, seek to influence and control regulation.
• first mover advantage – a more proactive reason for instigating
revolutionary change, is to be the first firm to introduce a new
product, service or technology and to build up barriers to entry for
late movers.
390
Chapter 10
391
Understanding the impact and context of change
Required:
Distinguish incremental change from transformational change. Explain
why the bank spokesperson and the trade union leader disagree over
their description of the change.
(15 minutes)
392
Chapter 10
4 Organisational culture
Definition
393
Understanding the impact and context of change
The cultural web was devised by Gerry Johnson as part of his work to attempt to
explain why firms often failed to adjust to environmental change as quickly as
they needed to. He concluded that firms developed a way of understanding their
organisation – called a paradigm – and found it difficult to think and act outside
this paradigm if it was particularly strong.
394
Chapter 10
395
Understanding the impact and context of change
396
Chapter 10
What is notable about the paradigm is that staff believe they are providing
a "good service", that they have a high professional standing and see
themselves as problem solvers. Unfortunately their problem solving and
professional standards do not appear to be customer focused. The fact
that stories and myths focus on how things "used to be" indicate staff are
out of touch with user needs.
Furthermore, given the degree of local autonomy, an emphasis on status
symbols such as parking spaces and a blame culture, it is hardly
surprising that co-operation and standardisation across branches is poor.
These are the cultural challenges that must be met if effective change is
to be implemented.
397
Understanding the impact and context of change
398
Chapter 10
Required:
Draft a report to the management of WDG, which identifies the various
aspects of the existing culture of HBY, using an appropriate model to
structure your report.
You should also use your report to explain the reasons for HBY’s staff
resisting the proposed takeover by WDG.
(25 minutes)
399
Understanding the impact and context of change
5 McKinsey 7S Model
Like the cultural web, McKinsey’s 7S model looks at corporate culture and the
various components that it is made up of. McKinsey saw culture as seven
interconnected elements, each beginning with the letter S.
Three of these factors are referred to as ‘hard’ (tangible and easy to quantify):
• Structure – this looks at the way the organisation is structured and who
reports to whom.
• Strategy – relates to the ways in which the organisation plans to gain a
competitive advantage or achieve other objectives.
• Systems – these are the daily activities and procedures followed by staff.
The remaining four factors are ‘soft’ (less easily quantified and more subjective):
• Skills – the skills, abilities and competences of the organisation’s
employees.
• Style – the style of leadership adopted within the organisation.
• Staff – the people that make up the organisation.
• Shared values – the core values of the organisation (i.e. the paradigm).
The model suggests that all seven elements have to be aligned with each in
order for the organisation to operate effectively.
400
Chapter 10
401
Understanding the impact and context of change
6 Resistance to change
Resistance to change is the action taken by individuals and groups when they
perceive that a change that is occurring is a threat to them.
Resistance may take many forms, including active or passive, overt or covert,
individual or organised, aggressive or timid. For each source of resistance,
management need to provide an appropriate response, e.g.:
402
Chapter 10
403
Understanding the impact and context of change
404
Chapter 10
7 Summary
405
Understanding the impact and context of change
406
Chapter 10
The trade union leader believes that the change will be much more
dramatic. He might believe that many employees will leave the bank
because they are unable to adapt to the new service, or because they are
unwilling to re-locate from the branches that are closed down. The bank
might push through the branch closure programme more quickly than it
has currently proposed, and staff redundancies could be made
compulsory if there are not enough individuals willing to take voluntary
redundancy.
Essentially, the two individuals take differing viewpoints because they are
looking at change differently. The spokesperson for the bank wants to
persuade employees to accept the change, and even welcome it. The
trade union representative wants to warn employees about the potential
consequences, and has therefore stressed the risks.
407
Understanding the impact and context of change
Introduction
This report will examine the impact of WDG’s proposals relating to the
takeover of HBY. Specifically, it will look at how these proposals will
affect the culture of HBY post-acquisition.
According to Handy, culture is defined as ‘the way we do things round
here’.
When analysing an organisation’s corporate culture, the most logical
model to use is the Cultural Web. This suggests that the culture of an
organisation can be broken down into six different aspects. Any attempt
to significantly change the culture of the organisation, as WDG is
attempting to do with HBY, is likely to lead to significant resistance.
Symbols
This looks at the symbols or symbolic actions that typify the organisation.
Within HBY, the symbols include the regular social gatherings supplied
by the company. This indicates that staff wellbeing and happiness is
valued by the company. Cutbacks to this area are likely to cause
resistance as staff will feel that WDG is indicating that they are no longer
as valued as they once were.
Power structure
This examines who is in charge (or who has the power) within the
organisation.
HBY currently appears to have several levels of management, with the
original founding family having ultimate control over the organisation.
WDG intends to replace many of these managers with a single layer of
their own management.
This is likely to upset many of HBY’s employees as it will not only lead to
redundancies, but it will also change the reporting system that they are
currently used to.
Organisational structure
The current management structure of HBY appears to be bureaucratic,
with a number of levels of management. WDG is planning to replace this
with a single level of its own management, flattening the structure.
408
Chapter 10
This may lead to resistance as it may reduce the chances for internal
promotion for HBY’s existing staff. There will be fewer management
positions, many of which will be filled by WDG’s staff for the foreseeable
future.
Control systems
Controls appear to be few and far between under the traditional approach
taken by HBY. Staff were largely expected to get on with their own jobs,
with management only getting involved if there was a problem.
The new management systems proposed by WDG involve a much more
hands-on approach, with employees being trained in the new systems by
WDG managers. This is likely to cause resistance as staff will feel that
they are no longer trusted by their management to get on with their work
in an effective manner.
The shift from a bonus based on a range of indicators, which focused on
quality, to pay which is piecework, and therefore only based on the level
of productivity, also indicates a shift in what the business expects from its
employees. This is likely to cause confusion amongst workers who are
used to a quality focus.
Paradigm
Overall, HBY’s approach has been a participative one, with defined roles
and a strong focus on quality. WDG seems to want to shift this towards a
focus on output and profitability. This fundamental move in culture is,
understandably, a difficult one for the staff of HBY to accept.
409
Understanding the impact and context of change
410