We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9
Cyclic scheduling
Cyclic scheduling is simple. Each task is allowed to run to
completion before it hands over to the next. A task cannot be discontinued as it runs. This is almost like the super loop operation we saw earlier in this chapter.
A diagrammatic example of cyclic scheduling is shown
in Figure 18.5. Here the horizontal band represents CPU activity and the numbered blocks the tasks as they execute. Tasks are seen executing in turn, with Task 3 initially the longest and 2 the shortest. In the third iteration, however, Task 1 takes longer and the overall loop time is longer. Cyclic scheduling carries the disadvantages of sequential programming in a loop, as outlined above. At least it is simple. Cyclic scheduling is simple. Each task is allowed to run to completion before it hands over to the next. A task cannot be discontinued as it runs. This is almost like the super loop operation we saw earlier in this chapter. A cyclical schedule is a scheduling method where tasks are repeated in a sequence without interruption at regular intervals:
Definition
A cyclical schedule is a scheduling approach where tasks
are repeated at regular intervals. It's similar to a super loop operation where each task is completed before the next one starts.
Examples
Cyclical schedules are used in batch industries,
manufacturing, and in compilers. For example, in a widget factory, a cyclical schedule might be used to schedule the tasks needed to build a single widget. Challenges In real-world production settings, cyclical schedules can be disrupted by unexpected events. These disruptions can be difficult to anticipate when generating a schedule.
The word "cyclical" describes things that occur in regular
intervals or have a regularly patterned pattern. For example, the moon's phases and the orbit of planets around the sun are cyclical
Priority-based scheduling is a method for programmers to
control the order in which processes are run by assigning each process a priority and scheduling the processes based on those priorities:
In priority-based scheduling, the process with the highest
priority is scheduled first. The CPU is allocated to the process with the highest priority.
Priorities can be based on a variety of factors,
including: Deadlines, Significance, Time limits, Memory requirements, and Ratio of average I/O burst to average CPU burst.
Priority-based scheduling is used in operating systems to
perform batch processes. However, a major problem with priority scheduling is that it can leave low priority processes waiting indefinitely, a condition known as indefinite blocking or starvation.
Priority scheduling involves priority assignment to every
process, and processes with higher priorities are carried out first, whereas tasks with equal priorities are carried out on a first-come-first-served (FCFS) or round robin basis. Priority scheduling can be either of the following:
Preemptive — This type of scheduling may preempt the
central processing unit (CPU) in the case the priority of the freshly arrived process is greater than those of the existing processes. Non-preemptive — This type of scheduling algorithm simply places the new process at the top of the ready queue
Priority of processes depends some factors
such as: Time limit Memory requirements of the process Ratio of average I/O to average CPU burst time There can be more factors on the basis of which priority of a process / job is determined. This priority is assigned to the processes by the scheduler. These priorities of processes are represented as simple integers in a fixed range such as 0 to 7, or maybe 0 to 4095. These numbers depend on the type of systems. Now that we know that each job is assigned a priority on the basis of which it is scheduled, we can move ahead with it's working and types. Types of Priority Scheduling algorithm There are two types of priority scheduling algorithm in OS:
Non-Preemptive Scheduling
In this type of scheduling:
If during the execution of a process, another process with a higher priority arrives for execution, even then the currently executing process will not be disturbed. The newly arrived high priority process will be put in next for execution since it has higher priority than the processes that are in waiting state for execution. All the other processes will remain in the waiting queue to be processes. Once the execution of the current process is done, the high priority process will be given the CPU for execution.
Preemptive Scheduling
Preemptive Sheduling as opposed to non-
preemptive scheduling will preempt (stop and store the currently executing process) the currently running process if a higher priority process enters the waiting state for execution and will execute the higher priority process first and then resume executing the previous process. Characteristics of Priority Scheduling Algorithm: It is a scheduling algorithm that schedules the incoming processes on the basis of the priority. Operating systems use it for performing batch processes If there exist two jobs / processes in the ready state (ready for execution) that have the same priority, then priority scheduling executed the processes on first come first serve basis. For every job that exists, we have a priority number assigned to it that indicates its priority level. If the integer value of the priority number is low, it means that the process has higher priority. (low number = high priority)
What is Priority Scheduling?
Priority scheduling is a method used in computer operating systems and task management systems to determine the order in which tasks are executed based on their priority level. Each task is assigned a priority value, and the task with the highest priority is executed first. This ensures that the most important tasks are completed in a timely manner.
How does Priority Scheduling work?
In priority scheduling, tasks are assigned priority levels based on their importance or urgency. The task with the highest priority is selected for execution first, followed by tasks with lower priority levels. If two tasks have the same priority level, the scheduling algorithm may use additional criteria, such as the order in which tasks were received, to determine the execution order.
What are the benefits of using Priority
Scheduling? One of the main benefits of using priority scheduling is that it allows important tasks to be completed quickly and efficiently. By assigning priority levels to tasks, organizations can ensure that critical tasks are given the attention they deserve. This can help improve productivity and ensure that deadlines are met.
Another benefit of priority scheduling is that it can help
organizations prioritize tasks based on their impact on business objectives. By assigning priority levels to tasks, organizations can focus on completing tasks that align with their strategic goals and objectives.
What are the limitations of Priority
Scheduling? One of the limitations of priority scheduling is that it can lead to starvation, where low-priority tasks are never executed because higher-priority tasks are constantly being selected for execution. This can result in delays for less critical tasks and impact overall system performance
Multitasking and concurrency are related concepts that
can both involve the execution of multiple tasks at once, but they have some key differences: Multitasking: Involves rapidly switching between multiple tasks on a single processor. Concurrency: Involves handling multiple tasks or processes at the same time, even if they aren't executed simultaneously. Tasks take turns using resources, giving the appearance that they are happening at the same time.
Concurrency can improve efficiency and responsiveness, but it can
also lead to issues if multiple tasks access shared resources at the same time. These issues are known as concurrency issues, and can include race conditions and deadlocks. If left unaddressed, these issues can lead to unexpected results or system failures.
To avoid these issues, developers can use synchronization
mechanisms like locks and semaphores to coordinate concurrent taHere are some other things to consider about multitasking and concurrency in real-time and embedded systems: True concurrency
Requires parallel processing in separate processors,
either a multi-processor system or multi-CPUs.
Process-process interaction
Communication between processes complicates the
implementation and analysis of a concurrent system. Threads Programmers can prune away nondeterminism by imposing constraints on execution order and limiting shared data accesses.
sks
Multitasking and concurrency are important concepts in
real-time and embedded systems, and they affect the performance of these systems:
Multitasking
A method where multiple tasks, or processes, share
processing resources, such as the CPU.
Concurrency
The design and organization of threads of execution,
resource sharing, scheduling mechanisms, and software allocation in a system. Real-time operating system (RTOS) An operating system that allows multiple programs to run concurrently, with a focus on predictability and determinism. In an RTOS, repeated tasks are performed within a tight time boundary