Scribd
Upload
4 views

CRDOutput

Uploaded by

RAY MARK ABALAYAN
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4 views

CRDOutput

Uploaded by

RAY MARK ABALAYAN
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research (STAR)

Sun Dec 08 14:24:35 2024

Analysis of Variance
Completely Randomized Design

========================================
ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: FPG
========================================

Summary Information
----------------------------------------
FACTOR NO. OF LEVELS LEVELS
----------------------------------------
TREATMENT 4 1, 2, 3, 4
----------------------------------------
Number of Observations Read and Used: 12

ANOVA TABLE
Response Variable: FPG
------------------------------------------------------------
Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F)
------------------------------------------------------------
TREATMENT 3 9318.6667 3106.2222 108.36 0.0000
Error 8 229.3333 28.6667
Total 11 9548.0000
------------------------------------------------------------

Summary Statistics
------------------
CV(%) FPG Mean
------------------
10.10 52
------------------

Standard Errors
--------------------
Effects StdErr
--------------------
TREATMENT 4.37
--------------------

Pairwise Mean Comparison of TREATMENT

Least Significant Difference (LSD) Test

Alpha 0.05
Error Degrees of Freedom 8
Error Mean Square 28.6667
Critical Value 2.3060
Test Statistics 10.0810

Summary of the Result:


----------------------------------
TREATMENT means N group
----------------------------------
1 27.33 3 c
2 40.00 3 b
3 44.67 3 b
4 100.00 3 a
----------------------------------
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

========================================
ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: MET
========================================

Summary Information
----------------------------------------
FACTOR NO. OF LEVELS LEVELS
----------------------------------------
TREATMENT 4 1, 2, 3, 4
----------------------------------------
Number of Observations Read and Used: 12

ANOVA TABLE
Response Variable: MET
------------------------------------------------------------
Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F)
------------------------------------------------------------
TREATMENT 3 4.1736 1.3912 4.39 0.0420
Error 8 2.5378 0.3172
Total 11 6.7114
------------------------------------------------------------

Summary Statistics
------------------
CV(%) MET Mean
------------------
2.06 27.30
------------------

Standard Errors
--------------------
Effects StdErr
--------------------
TREATMENT 0.4599
--------------------

Pairwise Mean Comparison of TREATMENT

Least Significant Difference (LSD) Test

Alpha 0.05
Error Degrees of Freedom 8
Error Mean Square 0.3172
Critical Value 2.3060
Test Statistics 1.0605

Summary of the Result:


---------------------------------
TREATMENT means N group
---------------------------------
1 26.69 3 b
2 26.85 3 b
3 27.46 3 ab
4 28.19 3 a
---------------------------------
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

=======================================
ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: EI
=======================================

Summary Information
----------------------------------------
FACTOR NO. OF LEVELS LEVELS
----------------------------------------
TREATMENT 4 1, 2, 3, 4
----------------------------------------
Number of Observations Read and Used: 12

ANOVA TABLE
Response Variable: EI
------------------------------------------------------------
Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F)
------------------------------------------------------------
TREATMENT 3 2.7812 0.9271 72.52 0.0000
Error 8 0.1023 0.0128
Total 11 2.8835
------------------------------------------------------------

Summary Statistics
-----------------
CV(%) EI Mean
-----------------
11.61 0.9742
-----------------

Standard Errors
--------------------
Effects StdErr
--------------------
TREATMENT 0.0923
--------------------

Pairwise Mean Comparison of TREATMENT


Least Significant Difference (LSD) Test

Alpha 0.05
Error Degrees of Freedom 8
Error Mean Square 0.0128
Critical Value 2.3060
Test Statistics 0.2129

Summary of the Result:


---------------------------------
TREATMENT means N group
---------------------------------
1 0.53 3 c
2 0.76 3 b
3 0.82 3 b
4 1.79 3 a
---------------------------------
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

========================================
ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: CUI
========================================

Summary Information
----------------------------------------
FACTOR NO. OF LEVELS LEVELS
----------------------------------------
TREATMENT 4 1, 2, 3, 4
----------------------------------------
Number of Observations Read and Used: 12

ANOVA TABLE
Response Variable: CUI
------------------------------------------------------------
Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F)
------------------------------------------------------------
TREATMENT 3 0.0854 0.0285 1.85 0.2171
Error 8 0.1233 0.0154
Total 11 0.2087
------------------------------------------------------------

Summary Statistics
------------------
CV(%) CUI Mean
------------------
30.22 0.4108
------------------

Standard Errors
--------------------
Effects StdErr
--------------------
TREATMENT 0.1014
--------------------

Table of Means
-----------------------
TREATMENT CUI Means
-----------------------
1 0.3100
2 0.3467
3 0.4767
4 0.5100
-----------------------

You might also like