Vocabulary
Vocabulary
Vocabulary
Vocabulary knowledge varies greatly among learners. The word knowledge gap between groups
of children begins before they enter school. Why do some students have a richer, fuller
vocabulary than some of their classmates?
Why do some students have a limited, inadequate vocabulary compared to most of their
classmates?
Speaking/vocabulary not encouraged at home
Limited experiences outside of home
Limited exposure to books
Reluctant reader
Second language—English language learners
Children who have been encouraged by their parents to ask questions and to learn about things
and ideas come to school with oral vocabularies many times larger than children from
disadvantaged homes. Without intervention this gap grows ever larger as students proceed
through school (Hart and Risley, 1995).
Chall’s classic 1990 study showed that students with low vocabulary development were able to
maintain their overall reading test scores at expected levels through grade four, but their mean
scores for word recognition and word meaning began to slip as words became more abstract,
technical, and literary. Declines in word recognition and word meaning continued, and by grade
seven, word meaning scores had fallen to almost three years below grade level, and mean
reading comprehension was almost a year below. Jeanne Chall coined the term “the fourth-grade
slump” to describe this pattern in developing readers (Chall, Jacobs, and Baldwin, 1990).
Incidental and Intentional Vocabulary Learning
How do we close the gap for students who have limited or inadequate vocabularies? The
National Reading Panel (2000) concluded that there is no single research-based method for
developing vocabulary and closing the gap. From its analysis, the panel recommended using a
variety of indirect (incidental) and direct (intentional) methods of vocabulary instruction.
Student-Friendly Definitions
The meaning of a new word should be explained to students rather than just providing a
dictionary definition for the word—which may be difficult for students to understand. According
to Isabel Beck, two basic principles should be followed in developing student-friendly
explanations or definitions (Beck et al., 2013):
Sometimes a word’s natural context (in text or literature) is not informative or helpful for
deriving word meanings (Beck et al., 2013). It is useful to intentionally create and develop
instructional contexts that provide strong clues to a word’s meaning. These are usually created
by teachers, but they can sometimes be found in commercial reading programs.
Semantic Mapping
Semantic maps help students develop connections among words and increase learning of
vocabulary words (Baumann et al., 2003; Heimlich and Pittleman, 1986). For example, by
writing an example, a non-example, a synonym, and an antonym, students must deeply process
the word persist.
Word Consciousness
Word consciousness is an interest in and awareness of words (Anderson and Nagy, 1992; Graves
and Watts-Taffe, 2002). Students who are word conscious are aware of the words around them—
those they read and hear and those they write and speak (Graves and Watts-Taffe, 2002). Word-
conscious students use words skillfully. They are aware of the subtleties of word meaning. They
are curious about language, and they enjoy playing with words and investigating the origins and
histories of words.
Teachers need to take word-consciousness into account throughout their instructional day—not
just during vocabulary lessons (Scott and Nagy, 2004). It is important to build a classroom “rich
in words” (Beck et al., 2002). Students should have access to resources such as dictionaries,
thesauruses, word walls, crossword puzzles, Scrabble® and other word games, literature, poetry
books, joke books, and word-play activities.
Language categories: Students learn to make finer distinctions in their word choices if
they understand the relationships among words, such as synonyms, antonyms, and
homographs.
Figurative language: The ability to deal with figures of speech is also a part of word-
consciousness (Scott and Nagy 2004). The most common figures of speech are similes,
metaphors, and idioms.
Once language categories and figurative language have been taught, students should be
encouraged to watch for examples of these in all content areas.