Dong_2023_J._Phys.__Conf._Ser._2501_012006_034602
Dong_2023_J._Phys.__Conf._Ser._2501_012006_034602
Dong_2023_J._Phys.__Conf._Ser._2501_012006_034602
Conference Series
Abstract. Vehicle braking stability performance can improve the safety of vehicle driving
during a braking. However, some parameters of vehicle structure impact on the vehicle braking
stability, the characteristic law of the relevant parameters on vehicle braking stability is ignored.
A simulation model of vehicle is established using the software of CarSim. The vehicle model
is included in the driving system, suspension, steering mechanism, braking system. The impact
of wheelbase, and the height of centre of vehicle mass on braking stability performance is
analysed. The characteristic law of the relevant parameters on vehicle braking stability is
concluded. Based on the characteristic law, the ideal vehicle braking stability is obtained by
controlling the vehicle braking force of wheel and the steering angle during a braking.
1. Introduction
Good vehicle braking performance can improve the safety of vehicle driving. The braking system is
able to make vehicle decelerate, stop safely and effectively, and ensure the vehicle braking stability
during a vehicle braking process. The vehicle braking stability is no mistracking, no side slip and no
loss of steering ability during a braking. Mokhiamar O used a sliding model theory to decrease the slip
angle of vehicle's mass centre and shorten the braking distance on the braking condition [1]. Jin
Xiaoling designed a logic threshold PID and Fuzzy PID controller to improve the braking stability at
low-speed and low-adhesion road [2]. Based on the software of Prescan, the emergency braking
system was proposed to improve the vehicle braking performance [3]. Hu Yuanzhi et al. compared the
safety distance models of five AEB algorithms to obtain the AEB algorithm with the best braking
performance, which greatly improved the safety of the vehicle under emergency braking conditions [4].
Taking a vehicle as an example, the software of CarSim is used to establish a simulation model of
vehicle with the braking system, driving system, suspension system, steering mechanism and other
subsystems, and the vehicle braking stability is studied.
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
NTMIM-2023 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2501 (2023) 012006 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2501/1/012006
2
NTMIM-2023 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2501 (2023) 012006 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2501/1/012006
Fr F = mx p mg (1)
Where, Fr - the sum of the vehicle driving resistance, F - the vehicle driving force, m -the vehicle
mass, x - the vehicle acceleration, g - the acceleration of gravity, and φp - the peak adhesion
coefficient.
The requirements for vehicle braking force are described in table 2.
When the wheels are locked, the braking force from ground is shown in (2).
F = mx = m(b g ) (2)
Where, xmax = s g , s - the sliding adhesion coefficient, and b - the coefficient of vehicle braking
force. x -the braking deceleration, xmax -the maximum braking deceleration.
2.2.3. Brake system model. In the vehicle model, the braking system is co-simulated with the controller
in Simulink by setting the brake pressure adjustment value. The input variables in CarSim are: left-
front brake braking pressure, right-front brake braking force, left-rear brake braking pressure, right-
rear brake braking pressure. Front braking torque is 300Nm,and rear braking torque is 200Nm.
In the brake system, the tire parameters are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Main parameters of tire
Name Value Name Value
Rolling radius /mm 310 Max. load /N 10000
No-load radius /mm 316 Tire rolling resistance coefficient 0.004
Tire width /mm 205 Tire rolling resistance speed coefficient /(h/km) 0.000025
Elastic stiffness /(N/mm) 228
vch2 0, Cr lr C f l f
2
vch → , Cr lr = C f l f (4)
vch2 0, Cr lr C f l f
Where, vch2 -the characteristic velocity of vehicle, lf and lr -the distance from the centre of vehicle
mass to the front axle and rear axle, respectively; Cf and Cr - the sideslip stiffness of the front and rear
axle, respectively. m- the total vehicle mass.
3
NTMIM-2023 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2501 (2023) 012006 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2501/1/012006
The vehicle stability depends on the ratio of v2 to vch2 and the value of vch2 is constant. However, the
sideslip stiffness value of the front and rear wheels will change because of the complicated driving
situation, the vehicle speed vch2 will also change.
Figure 2. Impact of wheelbase on vehicle roll angle Figure 3. Impact of wheelbase on yaw rate
The impact of the wheelbase on the vehicle yaw rate during a braking is shown in Fig.3. When the
wheelbase is increased from 2400mm to 2600mm, the maximum vehicle yaw rate is 0.8°, and when
the wheelbase is reduced from 2400mm to 2200mm, the maximum difference of the vehicle yaw
velocity is 0.42°. It can be seen that when the wheelbase is decreased, the vehicle yaw rate increases,
and the vehicle braking stability becomes worse; while the wheelbase is extended, the braking stability
becomes better.
3.2. The impact of the height of the center of mass on vehicle braking stability
The impact of the height of the centre of mass on the vehicle roll angle during a braking is shown in
Fig.4. When the height is increased from 540mm to 640mm, the vehicle roll angle increases by 0.04,
and when the height is reduced from 540mm to 440mm, the vehicle roll angle decreases by 0.035°. It
can be seen that when the height increases, the vehicle roll angle is the greater during a braking; When
the height is lower, the vehicle roll angle is lower.
The impact of the height of the centre of mass on the vehicle yaw rate during a braking is shown in
Fig.5. When the height is increased from 540mm to 640mm, the vehicle yaw rate increases by 0.7°,
and when the height of the centre of mass of the vehicle is reduced from 540mm to 440mm, the
vehicle yaw rate decreases by 0.2°. It can be seen that during a braking, when the height of the centre
of mass of the vehicle increases, the vehicle yaw rate is increased; When the height of the centre of
mass becomes lower, the vehicle yaw rate is deceased.
4
NTMIM-2023 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2501 (2023) 012006 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2501/1/012006
Figure 4. Impact of wheelbase on vehicle roll angle Figure 5. Impact of wheelbase on yaw rate
As shown in Fig.6, the vehicle has a slight roll with the step input of the steering wheel angle, and
the vehicle is stable in a certain range after 2s. As shown in Fig.7, the vehicle has a slight yaw, and the
vehicle is stable after 2s.
In conclusion, the vehicle is driving at a higher velocity on the low road adhesion coefficient, the
vehicle roll angle and vehicle yaw velocity is controlled in a relatively small range by the
corresponding wheels to apply the brake. The vehicle brake stability is good with the vehicle roll angle
of 0.73°and the vehicle yaw velocity of 2.7°.
5. Conclusion
A simulation vehicle model is built based on the software of CarSim. The simulation model is
included in the driving system, suspension, steering mechanism, braking system and other subsystems.
The impact of wheelbase, vehicle mass and the height of centre of vehicle mass on braking stability
performance is analyzed. The characteristic law of relevant parameters on vehicle braking stability is
concluded. At the same time, by controlling the vehicle braking force, the ideal vehicle braking
stability performance is obtained in the simulation. All the results provide a reference for vehicle
braking system performance.
5
NTMIM-2023 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2501 (2023) 012006 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2501/1/012006
Acknowledgment
The work was funded by Tianjin Science and Technology Planning Project (21YDTPJC00400).
References
[1] Mokhiamar O and Abe M, Active Wheel Steering and Yaw Moment Control Combination to
Maximize Stability as Well as Vehicle Responsiveness During Quick Lane Change for
Active Vehicle Safety, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D:
Journal of Automobile Engineering, 216 (2002) 115-124.
[2] Xiaoling Jin, Research on the control strategy of automobile brake performance under limited
state. Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, (2016) pp30-45.
[3] LI lin, Zhu Xichan and Dong Xiaofei, A research on the collision avoidance strategy for an
autonomous emergency braking system, Automotive Engineering, 2 (2015) 168-174.
[4] Hu Yuanzhi, Lv Zhanghao and Liu X, Algorithms and simulation of longitudinal collision
avoidance for autonomous emergency break (AEB) system based on Prescan, Journal of
Automotive Safety and Energy, 8 (2017) 136-142.
[5] M. Gavas and M. Izciler, Deep drawing with anti-braking system (ABS), Mechanism and
Machine Theory, 12 (2006) 1467-1476.
[6] Guo Jianting, Wang Shaoyong and Lv Kuichao, Automobile ABS Based on Matlab Simulation,
Automobile applied technology, 11 (2012) 24-27.