Unit 1
Unit 1
Simulation
G. Gorden, System Simulation, Prentice Hall of India A.M. Law and W.D. Kelton, Simulation Modeling and
ISBN: 9788120301405 Analysis, McGraw Hill, 1991
Deterministic Activities
• the outcome is entirely predictable given the initial conditions and inputs
• The exact outcome of deterministic activities can be precisely determined based on known factors,
equations, or rules governing the system.
Examples: simple mathematical calculations, classical mechanics problems (e.g., projectile motion),
and many engineering design processes where the behavior of the system can be fully understood and
predicted with certainty.
• Even with the same initial conditions and inputs, the outcome may vary each time the activity is
performed. However, the random output can be often measured and described in the form of
probability distribution.
• involve inherent variability in their outcomes due to random factors, chance events, or incomplete
information about the system.
Examples: random walks, stock market fluctuations, weather forecasting, and radioactive decay.
These processes exhibit variability and unpredictability in their outcomes due to the influence of
random factors.
𝑥ሷ + 2𝜍𝜔𝑥ሶ + 𝜔2 𝑥 = 𝜔2 𝑓(𝑥)
Where 2𝜍ω =D/M and 𝜔2 =K/M
• The factor 𝜍 is called the damping ratio, and when the motion is oscillatory, the frequency of
oscillation is determined from the formula 𝜔 = 2𝜋𝑓 where 𝑓 is the number of cycles per second.
Naylor, TJ, Balintfy, JL, Burdick, DS, and K Chu, Computer Simulation Techniques, Wiley, NY, 1966.
• The first rule indicates that simulation should not be used when the problem can be solved by common
sense. An example is given of an automobile tag facility serving customers who arrive randomly at an
average rate of 100/hour and are served at a mean rate of 12/hour. To determine the minimum number
of servers needed, simulation is not necessary. Just compute 100/12 = 8.33 indicating that nine or
more servers are needed.
• The second rule says that simulation should not be used if the problem can be solved analytically. For
example, under certain conditions, the average waiting time in the example above can be found from
curves that were developed by Hillier and Lieberman [2015].
• The fourth rule says not to use simulation if the costs exceed the savings. There are many steps in
completing a simulation, and these must be done thoroughly. If a simulation study costs $20,000 and
the savings might be $10,000, simulation would not be appropriate.
• Rules five and six indicate that simulation should not be performed if the resources or time are not
available. If the simulation is estimated to cost $20,000 and there is only $10,000 available, the
suggestion is not to venture into a simulation study. Similarly, if a decision in needed in two weeks
and a simulation will take a month, the simulation study is not advised. Simulation takes data,
sometimes lots of data. If no data is available, not even estimates, simulation is not advised.
5/2/2024 Er. Narayan Sapkota, M.Sc. 59
When Simulation Is Not Appropriate ?
• The next rule concerns the ability to verify and validate the model. If there is not enough time or if the
personnel are not available, simulation is not appropriate.
• If managers have unreasonable expectations, if they ask for too much too soon, or if the power of
simulation is overestimated, simulation might not be appropriate.
• Last, if system behavior is too complex or can't be defined, simulation is not appropriate. Human
behavior is sometimes extremely complex to model.
Banks, J., & Gibson, R. (1997). 10 rules for determining when simulation is not appropriate. IIE Solutions, 29(9).
Hillier, F. S., & Lieberman, G. J. (2015). Introduction to operations research. McGraw-Hill.