See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/374846837

Enhancing diversity and reducing bias in recruitment through AI: a review of

strategies and challenges

Article in Информатика Экономика Управление - Informatics Economics Management · October 2023

DOI: 10.47813/2782-5280-2023-2-4-0101-0118

CITATIONS READS

8 5,167

1 author:

Ramakrishnan Vivek
Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (KU)
34 PUBLICATIONS 100 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Ramakrishnan Vivek on 20 October 2023.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics. Economics. Management http://oajiem.com/

УДК: 347.2 EDN: RDVWBA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47813/2782-5280-2023-2-4-0101-0118

Enhancing diversity and reducing bias in recruitment through

AI: a review of strategies and challenges
Ramakrishnan Vivek

Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (KU), Eichstätt & Ingolstadt, Bavaria, Germany

Abstract. This study explores the interaction between conventional hiring practices and the growing
impact of technology in the ever-changing field of recruitment. In the current era of globalisation and
the recent surge in remote work, especially in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, the traditional
limitations of talent acquisition have been transcended, extending beyond geographical boundaries. The
advent of digital platforms, online job boards, and social media channels has brought about a paradigm
shift in the way organisations connect with potential candidates. This transformation has resulted in a
more expansive and varied talent pool, thereby enhancing the recruitment process. However, the process
of digitization presents a unique set of challenges, specifically the complex task of managing and
analysing large volumes of data, as well as the need to ensure fair and efficient recruitment procedures.
This report highlights the significant importance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in addressing these
challenges, emphasising its potential to improve efficiency, fairness, and scalability in the hiring
process. The study emphasises the importance of incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into
contemporary recruitment approaches. It advocates for a balanced combination of technological
advancements and human expertise.

Keywords: recruitment landscape, technological advancements, modern recruitment, AI-driven

recruitment, unbiased decision-making.

For citation: Vivek, R. (2023). Enhancing diversity and reducing bias in recruitment through AI: a
review of strategies and challenges. Информатика. Экономика. Управление - Informatics.
Economics. Management, 2(4), 0101–0118. https://doi.org/10.47813/2782-5280-2023-2-4-0101-0118

INTRODUCTION

Overview of the current recruiting landscape

In today's globalized economy, the recruitment landscape has evolved dramatically,

becoming more complex and competitive. The traditional methods of recruitment, which
primarily relied on manual processes and human judgment, are now intertwined with digital

© R. Vivek, 2023 0101

 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

platforms, online job boards, and social media channels. These technological advancements
have expanded the reach of employers, allowing them to tap into a broader pool of candidates
from various geographical locations and diverse backgrounds. Furthermore, the rise of remote
work, especially post the COVID-19 pandemic, has further blurred geographical boundaries,
making talent acquisition a truly global endeavor. However, with this expansion comes the
challenge of sifting through vast amounts of data to identify the right candidates, ensuring that
the process is both efficient and free from biases. The need for speed, efficiency, and fairness
has never been more pronounced [1].
The digital transformation of the recruitment landscape has also brought about a shift in
the expectations and behaviors of job seekers. Today's candidates, especially the younger
generation, are tech-savvy and expect a seamless, digital-first experience throughout their job
search journey. They utilize platforms like LinkedIn, Glassdoor, and Indeed not just to find job
listings, but to research company cultures, read reviews, and even negotiate offers [2]. This has
made employer branding and online reputation management crucial for organizations aiming
to attract top talent. Furthermore, the emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the
workplace has significantly influenced recruitment strategies. Organizations are not only
striving to create diverse teams but are also under societal and, in some cases, regulatory
pressure to demonstrate their commitment to DEI in their hiring practices. This has led to a
demand for more transparent and accountable recruitment processes, where decisions are based
on merit and potential rather than unconscious biases or outdated criteria. In this evolving
landscape, the challenge for recruiters is twofold: to harness the power of technology to meet
the changing expectations of job seekers while ensuring that their processes remain fair,
unbiased, and aligned with the broader organizational goals of diversity and inclusion [3].

The role of AI in modern recruiting

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in the modern

recruitment landscape. Its capabilities extend beyond mere automation of repetitive tasks. AI-
powered tools, equipped with machine learning algorithms, can analyze vast datasets, identify
patterns, and make predictions with a degree of accuracy that is often beyond human capability.
For instance, AI can scan thousands of resumes in a fraction of the time it would take a human
recruiter, highlighting candidates that best match the job requirements. Moreover, AI-driven
platforms can enhance the candidate experience by providing real-time feedback, personalizing
job recommendations based on individual preferences and skills, and even conducting initial

0102
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

screening interviews using chatbots or virtual assistants. These innovations not only streamline
the recruitment process but also ensure that candidates are evaluated based on objective criteria,
potentially reducing human biases [4].
However, the integration of AI in recruiting is not without its challenges. While AI has
the potential to revolutionize the recruitment process, it also carries the risk of perpetuating and
amplifying existing biases if not designed and implemented carefully. The algorithms that
power AI tools are only as good as the data they are trained on. If this data carries historical
biases, the AI system can inadvertently perpetuate these biases, leading to skewed recruitment
outcomes. Furthermore, the "black box" nature of many AI algorithms can make it challenging
to understand and explain their decision-making processes. This lack of transparency can raise
concerns about fairness and accountability, especially when adverse decisions are made about
candidates [5].
In this review, we will delve deeper into the role of AI in enhancing diversity and
reducing bias in recruiting. We will explore the challenges and pitfalls associated with AI-
driven recruitment tools and discuss strategies to ensure that these tools promote fairness and
diversity. Through a comprehensive examination of the current landscape, best practices, and
future directions, this review aims to provide insights and recommendations for organizations
seeking to leverage AI for unbiased and diverse recruiting.

THE IMPORTANCE OF DIVERSITY IN THE WORKPLACE

Benefits of a diverse workforce

In the contemporary business environment, the significance of a diverse workforce has

been increasingly recognized and emphasized by scholars, industry leaders, and policymakers
alike. A diverse workforce, which encompasses a range of backgrounds, experiences, and
perspectives, offers a plethora of benefits that can drive both organizational success and societal
progress.
1. Enhanced Creativity and Innovation: One of the most frequently cited advantages of
diversity is its potential to foster creativity and innovation. When individuals from varied
backgrounds and experiences collaborate, they bring a multitude of perspectives to the table.
This diversity of thought can lead to more comprehensive problem-solving, as different
individuals offer unique solutions based on their distinct experiences. Consequently,

0103
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

organizations with diverse teams are often better positioned to innovate and adapt in a rapidly
changing business environment [6].
2. Improved Financial Performance: Numerous studies have drawn correlations between
workforce diversity and better financial outcomes. For instance, a report by McKinsey &
Company found that companies in the top quartile for racial and ethnic diversity are 35% more
likely to have financial returns above their respective national industry medians. Such findings
suggest that diversity is not just a moral imperative but also a business one [7].
3. Enhanced Employee Satisfaction and Retention: A diverse and inclusive work
environment can lead to increased job satisfaction among employees. When individuals feel
valued and included, irrespective of their background, they are more likely to be engaged and
committed to their roles. This not only boosts productivity but also reduces turnover, leading
to significant cost savings for organizations in terms of recruitment and training [8].
4. Better Decision Making: Diversity can enhance the decision-making process within
organizations. Diverse teams tend to consider a broader range of options and scrutinize them
more thoroughly compared to homogenous teams. This rigorous evaluation can lead to better-
informed decisions, reducing the likelihood of costly mistakes [6].
5. Enhanced Reputation and Brand Image: In an era where consumers are becoming
increasingly conscious of the values and practices of the companies they patronize, having a
diverse workforce can enhance an organization's reputation. Companies that champion
diversity are often viewed as progressive and socially responsible, making them more attractive
to both potential employees and customers [9].
6. Access to a Broader Talent Pool: Embracing diversity allows organizations to tap into
a wider talent pool. By not limiting themselves to a particular demographic or background,
companies can access a richer set of skills, experiences, and competencies. This is especially
crucial in a globalized world where businesses operate across different cultures and markets
[7].
7. Improved Customer Insights: A diverse workforce can offer invaluable insights into
the preferences and needs of a varied customer base. Employees from different backgrounds
can provide perspectives that might be overlooked in a more homogenous environment,
enabling the company to cater to a broader range of customers effectively [10].

0104
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

Current challenges in achieving diversity

While the benefits of a diverse workforce are increasingly acknowledged, achieving

genuine diversity remains a complex endeavor for many organizations. Several challenges
persist, often rooted in systemic, cultural, and organizational barriers that hinder the realization
of truly inclusive workplaces.
Historical and Systemic Barriers: Many industries and professions have historically
been dominated by specific demographic groups, often to the exclusion of others. These
historical patterns can create entrenched systemic barriers. For instance, certain professions
might lack a pipeline of diverse candidates because historically marginalized groups have been
excluded from relevant educational or training opportunities. Overcoming these barriers
requires not just organizational interventions but broader societal efforts to address educational
and socio-economic disparities [11].
Unconscious Bias: Even with the best intentions, individuals can harbor unconscious
biases that influence their judgments and decisions. In the context of recruitment and
promotion, such biases can inadvertently favor certain groups over others. For instance, a hiring
manager might gravitate towards candidates who share their background or experiences, not
out of overt prejudice, but because of an unconscious affinity for the familiar. Combatting
unconscious bias requires sustained training and awareness efforts, as well as mechanisms to
ensure accountability in decision-making processes [12].
Resistance to Change: In some organizational cultures, there might be resistance to
diversity initiatives, often stemming from misconceptions or fears about the implications of
change. Some employees might perceive diversity efforts as zero-sum, fearing that their
opportunities might diminish as others gain. Addressing such resistance requires clear
communication about the benefits of diversity, not just for marginalized groups, but for the
organization and its members as a whole [13].
Lack of Representation in Leadership: Diversity efforts can be undermined if there's a
lack of diverse representation at the top echelons of an organization. Leadership sets the tone
for organizational culture, and if leaders do not reflect the diversity the organization aspires to,
it can send a discouraging message to employees. Moreover, without diverse leadership, there's
a risk that diversity initiatives might lack the necessary support or resources to succeed [14].
Tokenism: Another challenge is the risk of tokenism, where organizations make
superficial efforts to appear diverse without genuine commitment to inclusion. For instance,

0105
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

hiring a few individuals from underrepresented groups without addressing broader cultural or
systemic issues can lead to feelings of isolation for those individuals and can undermine the
authenticity of diversity efforts [11].
Inadequate Resources and Training: While many organizations express a commitment
to diversity, they might not allocate adequate resources or training to support these initiatives.
Achieving diversity requires sustained effort, including training programs, mentorship
initiatives, and mechanisms to monitor and address disparities. Without the necessary
resources, diversity efforts can stagnate or fail [11].
Globalization and Cultural Differences: As businesses operate in an increasingly
globalized environment, they encounter diverse cultural norms and expectations. What's
considered a diversity best practice in one culture might not be applicable or effective in
another. Navigating these cultural nuances requires a nuanced understanding and a flexible
approach to diversity and inclusion [13].

UNDERSTANDING BIAS IN AI RECRUITING TOOLS

How Bias Creeps into AI Algorithms

AI and its subset, machine learning, have garnered significant attention as powerful
tools within the realm of recruitment. These technologies hold the potential to revolutionise the
recruitment landscape by offering enhanced efficiency, objectivity, and scalability. The
susceptibility of these algorithms to biases is inherent in their reliance on extensive data for
predictive purposes. The comprehension of how these biases permeate AI systems is of utmost
importance in order to guarantee fairness and equity in recruitment procedures [15].
Machine learning, at its essence, encompasses the process of training algorithms using
past data in order to generate predictions for novel, unobserved data. The algorithm is designed
to detect and analyse patterns and relationships within the provided training data, utilising these
identified patterns to inform decision-making processes. Nevertheless, in the event that the
training data incorporates biases, there is a possibility for the algorithm to acquire and
perpetuate these biases, consequently resulting in outcomes that are distorted. One prominent
factor contributing to bias in AI recruiting tools is the reliance on historical data as the
foundation for training these algorithms. If biases, such as those pertaining to gender, race, age,
or other factors, had an impact on previous recruitment decisions, it is likely that these biases
will be evident in the resulting data. An example of this is when a company has a historical

0106
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

tendency to prefer candidates from specific universities or backgrounds. If an AI system is

trained using this data, it may disproportionately prioritise candidates who resemble those from
the past, even if such preferences are no longer applicable or desirable [16].
The feature selection process represents an additional pathway through which bias can
infiltrate AI systems. Features, in the context of algorithms, refer to the variables or attributes
that are taken into consideration during the decision-making process. The inclusion of irrelevant
or potentially discriminatory features in a model has the potential to result in biased outcomes.
An instance of this scenario could arise when an algorithm takes into account an applicant's
address, which may be associated with specific racial or socio-economic demographics.
Consequently, the algorithm may unintentionally make decisions influenced by these factors,
even if they are not explicitly incorporated within the dataset. In addition, it is important to
acknowledge that certain algorithms can inadvertently introduce bias due to their inherent
design. Certain algorithms have been specifically developed to optimise for particular
outcomes. However, if these outcomes are not meticulously selected, there is a risk that biased
results may be inadvertently prioritised. An algorithm that aims to optimise the number of
successful hires may exhibit a preference for candidates who resemble those who have
previously been successful, even if this perpetuates biases that have been historically observed
[17].
The existence of feedback loops poses an additional challenge. AI systems utilised in
recruitment frequently function within dynamic environments, wherein their decisions have a
consequential impact on future data. When an AI tool, which has been influenced by historical
biases, makes biased recruitment decisions, these decisions are subsequently incorporated into
the system's training data. The phenomenon described can give rise to a feedback loop in which
the system perpetually strengthens and magnifies its own biases [18].
Identifying and rectifying biases can be a challenging task due to the complexity and
opacity exhibited by certain machine learning models, particularly deep learning models. The
models under discussion, commonly referred to as "black boxes," possess the ability to perform
a multitude of computations and take into account a wide range of variables. Consequently, it
becomes challenging to ascertain the exact process by which specific decisions are arrived at.
The absence of transparency poses a significant obstacle in identifying the origins of bias and
effectively implementing measures to address it [16].
It is important to acknowledge that despite attempts to remove explicit biases from AI
systems, there exists a potential for the introduction of subtle, implicit biases. In the event that

0107
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

gender-specific information is eliminated from a dataset, it is possible that other variables, such
as particular hobbies or affiliations, may still exhibit a correlation with gender and subsequently
impact the decision-making process of the algorithm. Moreover, the human-AI interaction
aspect cannot be overlooked. Although AI systems have the potential to offer impartial
recommendations, it is important to acknowledge that biases may still be introduced through
the interactions and interpretations of these recommendations by human recruiters. An instance
of this scenario can be observed when a recruiter, without engaging in critical evaluation,
excessively relies on the recommendations provided by an AI system. In doing so, they may
unknowingly contribute to the perpetuation of biases embedded within the system [19].

Real-world Consequences of Biased AI in Recruiting

The incorporation of AI into recruitment procedures has garnered praise due to its
capacity to enhance efficiency and impartiality in the process of candidate evaluation. The
effectiveness and fairness of AI, like any other tool, depend on how it is designed and
implemented. The infiltration of biases into AI recruiting tools can have significant
ramifications in the real world, impacting individuals, organisations, and society as a whole.
The impact of biased AI can be particularly harmful to individuals, especially those
seeking employment opportunities. Individuals from historically marginalised or
underrepresented groups may encounter a situation where biased algorithms systematically
disregard or underestimate their worth. This issue is not solely of theoretical significance.
Numerous studies have provided evidence indicating that specific AI recruiting tools may
unintentionally exhibit a bias towards resumes containing hobbies or terms traditionally
associated with males, thereby placing female candidates at a disadvantage. Biases of this
nature have the potential to sustain and prolong prevailing disparities, thereby depriving
individuals of equal opportunities that are not contingent upon their abilities or potential [20].
In addition to the direct consequences on employment opportunities, it is crucial to
acknowledge the psychological burden associated with this situation. Experiencing repeated
rejections or being consistently overlooked, particularly when the underlying reasons are
unclear, can have detrimental effects on an individual's self-esteem and overall confidence.
Over the course of time, it is possible for individuals to internalise these biases, resulting in a
self-fulfilling prophecy wherein they may refrain from pursuing certain roles or fail to perform
at their best when they do, due to the belief that the system is inherently biased against them.
The utilisation of biased AI tools by organisations can have significant repercussions on their

0108
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

ability to access a diverse pool of talent. Companies restrict their ability to tap into a diverse
pool of skills, experiences, and perspectives by disregarding qualified candidates due to
irrelevant or discriminatory criteria. The aforementioned circumstance has the potential to
impede the progress of innovation and diminish the organization's ability to remain competitive
within the global market [21].
In addition, it is important to consider the potential risks to one's reputation. In today's
era of widespread information availability, it is crucial to acknowledge that instances of biased
AI recruitment can swiftly gain public attention. This can result in adverse publicity and
potential legal consequences. Companies may potentially encounter legal action or regulatory
investigations, which can result in financial penalties and reputational harm to their brand.
Societal Implications: At a larger societal level, the presence of biased AI in the
recruitment process has the potential to further amplify existing inequalities within society. The
presence of systematic disadvantages experienced by certain groups in the job market has the
potential to contribute to broader socio-economic disparities. Over the course of time, a
consequence of this phenomenon is the emergence of a society characterised by distinct social
strata, wherein certain groups possess a disproportionate share of opportunities and resources,
while others encounter systemic disadvantages. In addition, there exists a potential danger of
establishing a feedback loop that sustains and magnifies biases. If AI tools that exhibit bias are
inclined towards specific demographics, it is likely that these groups will experience
overrepresentation in particular industries or roles. The distorted portrayal described above can
subsequently be employed to rationalise or strengthen pre-existing prejudices, thereby
establishing a self-perpetuating pattern that is difficult to disrupt [20].
The Ethical Dimension: In addition to the observable outcomes, it is crucial to take into
account the ethical aspect. The utilisation of AI tools with inherent biases in the recruitment
process gives rise to concerns regarding the principles of fairness, justice, and the societal
framework we aspire to construct. The question arises as to whether our acceptance of biased
tools without critical examination implies our implicit support for these biases. The notion of
perceiving AI as an impartial and unbiased instrument, devoid of the biases and prejudices that
often influence human decision-making, holds a strong allure. Nevertheless, it is important to
note that this particular viewpoint can be deceptive. AI tools are the result of deliberate human
creation, having been developed and designed by individuals. These tools are then trained using
data that has been generated by humans. Furthermore, the application and utilisation of these

0109
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

AI tools are determined and defined by human beings within specific contexts. Therefore, like
any other human endeavour, they are prone to biases.
Acknowledging the importance of recognising the issue at hand is an initial and crucial
step towards effectively addressing it. Through a critical examination of the design,
implementation, and consequences of AI recruiting tools, it is possible to identify potential
sources of bias and subsequently implement corrective measures. The successful resolution of
this issue necessitates the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach, which entails the integration
of technical proficiency with perspectives derived from the fields of social sciences, ethics, and
law [21].

STRATEGIES TO ENHANCE DIVERSITY USING AI

Best practices in data collection and algorithm design

In the quest to harness the capabilities of AI for recruitment, it is imperative to ensure

that these tools promote diversity rather than inadvertently perpetuate existing biases. The
foundation of any AI system lies in its data and the algorithms that process this data. Thus, the
strategies to enhance diversity using AI are deeply rooted in best practices in data collection
and algorithm design.

Data collection: the bedrock of AI systems

The data used to train AI models plays a pivotal role in determining the outcomes these
models produce. If the training data is biased, the AI system will inevitably produce biased
results. For instance, if an AI system is trained predominantly on resumes of individuals from
a particular demographic, it may inadvertently favor candidates from that demographic. To
counteract this, it's crucial to ensure that the data collection process is both comprehensive and
representative. This involves sourcing data from diverse groups, ensuring that all potential
candidates, irrespective of their gender, ethnicity, age, or other demographic factors, are
adequately represented. It's equally important to continuously monitor and update the training
data to reflect the evolving nature of the job market and societal norms. However, merely
collecting diverse data isn't enough. It's essential to preprocess and clean this data to remove
any potential sources of bias. For instance, certain terms or phrases in resumes that are irrelevant
to job performance but might correlate with a particular demographic should be neutralized or
removed [22].

0110
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

Algorithm design: beyond mere accuracy

While the primary goal of many AI systems is to achieve high accuracy, in the context
of recruitment, it's essential to balance accuracy with fairness. Traditional algorithms that focus
solely on accuracy might inadvertently favor majority groups, leading to biased outcomes. One
approach to address this is to incorporate fairness constraints into the algorithm design. These
constraints ensure that the algorithm doesn't disproportionately favor or disadvantage any
particular group. Techniques such as adversarial training, where the algorithm is trained to not
only predict the outcome but also ensure that the predictions are not based on sensitive attributes
like gender or ethnicity, can be employed [23]. Another strategy is to use explainable AI (XAI)
techniques. The "black box" nature of many AI models can make it challenging to understand
their decision-making processes. XAI techniques aim to make these processes more transparent,
allowing stakeholders to understand and, if necessary, challenge the AI's decisions. By shedding
light on how the AI system arrives at its decisions, it becomes easier to identify and rectify
potential sources of bias [24].

Continuous monitoring and feedback loops

Even with the best data collection practices and algorithm design, it's possible for biases
to creep into AI systems. This makes continuous monitoring essential. Regular audits of the AI
system's decisions can help identify any patterns of bias or discrimination. Feedback loops,
where the outcomes produced by the AI system are continuously fed back into the system for
retraining, can help in iteratively refining the model and reducing biases [25].

CHALLENGES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Limitations of current AI tools in promoting diversity

While AI has the potential to bring about significant changes in the field of recruitment,
it is important to recognise that it is not a cure-all solution for addressing the challenges
associated with promoting diversity. The current AI tools possess certain inherent limitations
that can unintentionally impede the very objectives they strive to accomplish.
According to Mitić [26], it is important to note that AI algorithms are inherently driven
by data. Artificial intelligence systems possess the remarkable ability to acquire knowledge,
adjust their behaviour, and engage in decision-making processes by leveraging the data they

0111
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

have been exposed to during their training. The inadvertent perpetuation and amplification of
biases can occur in AI systems when the training data is skewed or contains historical biases.
An example of a potential bias in AI systems can arise when they are trained on resumes
primarily from a sector that is predominantly male-dominated. In such cases, the AI system
may inadvertently develop a preference for male candidates. The occurrence referred to as
"algorithmic bias" presents a substantial obstacle to achieving the goal of impartial recruitment.
In addition, the intricacy of AI models, particularly deep learning algorithms, frequently
gives rise to a phenomenon commonly referred to as the "black box" problem. Although these
models have demonstrated remarkable predictive accuracy, their decision-making mechanisms
often lack transparency and pose challenges in terms of interpretation. The absence of
transparency can pose challenges within the context of recruitment. When an AI-driven system
rejects a candidate, the underlying reasons for this rejection may not be readily apparent,
thereby raising concerns regarding the principles of fairness and accountability [27].
According to Gonzalez et al. [28], another constraint that should be considered is the
excessive dependence on AI tools. Although these tools possess the ability to efficiently analyse
large quantities of data and detect patterns those human recruiters may overlook, they are
deficient in terms of nuanced comprehension and emotional intelligence, which are innate to
humans. One example of a limitation in AI systems is their potential inability to fully
comprehend the cultural significance of certain experiences or qualifications. Additionally,
these systems may misinterpret unconventional career paths, which could actually indicate the
possession of unique skills and perspectives that are valuable to an organisation. Relying
exclusively on AI for making recruitment decisions can potentially result in overlooking
valuable opportunities.
The swift advancement of AI technologies necessitates that the regulatory framework
frequently struggles to keep pace. The existing regulations may not sufficiently tackle the
difficulties presented by AI-powered recruitment tools, thereby giving rise to potential
ambiguities in terms of legality and ethics. The existing legal framework aims to prohibit
discriminatory practises in employment, specifically those based on race, gender, or age.
However, the application of these laws becomes more ambiguous when considering the
inadvertent biases introduced by AI algorithms Chung et al. [29].
Furthermore, one must also consider the issue of user trust. The notion of an algorithm
assuming a critical role in determining one's professional trajectory can evoke unease among
both recruiters and candidates. The establishment of trust necessitates the presence of both

0112
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

robust and equitable AI systems, as well as the implementation of effective communication

strategies that elucidate the inner workings of these systems and the protective measures in
place to mitigate biases [27].
The future of AI in recruitment is poised at a critical juncture. The potential of AI to
revolutionise the recruitment process is undeniable. It holds the promise of enhancing
efficiency, objectivity, and alignment with the goals of diversity and inclusion. However, it is
important to note that the aforementioned limitations and challenges serve to highlight the
necessity of adopting a well-rounded and comprehensive approach [26].
An area of exploration that holds promise is the advancement of hybrid models that
integrate the respective advantages of AI and human judgement. In the context of these models,
(AI) tools have the capability to analyse extensive datasets and identify potential candidates
using objective criteria. However, it is important to note that human recruiters ultimately retain
the authority to make final decisions. This is because human recruiters possess a nuanced
comprehension and emotional intelligence that can contribute valuable insights to the decision-
making process [29].
An additional area that merits investigation is the advancement of AI models that exhibit
greater transparency. The opacity of deep learning algorithms can pose a significant drawback
in situations that necessitate transparency and accountability, despite their inherent power. The
objective of research in the field of explainable AI (XAI) is to create models that not only
maintain their ability to accurately predict outcomes, but also provide a deeper understanding
of the reasoning behind their decisions [27].

The Future of AI in Unbiased and Diverse Recruiting

The trajectory of AI's role in recruitment is undeniably forward-moving, with its

potential to reshape the very fabric of talent acquisition processes. As organizations globally
recognize the imperative of unbiased and diverse hiring, the intersection of AI and these
objectives becomes a focal point of discussion. The future of AI in this domain is laden with
possibilities, but it also demands a rigorous examination of its potential pitfalls and the
strategies to navigate them [30].
One of the most promising prospects for AI in recruitment is the development and
integration of explainable AI (XAI) models. As previously discussed, the opacity of certain AI
models can be a significant barrier to their acceptance and trustworthiness. XAI seeks to bridge
this gap by offering models that are both accurate and interpretable. In the context of

0113
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

recruitment, this means that decisions made by AI tools can be understood, justified, and, if
necessary, challenged by human recruiters and candidates alike. Such transparency can go a
long way in building trust and ensuring that AI-driven decisions align with the broader goals of
diversity and inclusion [31].
Another pivotal direction is the continuous monitoring and auditing of AI systems. As
AI models learn and adapt over time, there's a risk that they might drift from their original
objectives or develop new biases based on the data they encounter. Regular audits can help
identify and rectify such issues, ensuring that AI tools remain aligned with the goals of unbiased
recruitment. These audits could be conducted by internal teams or third-party organizations
specializing in AI ethics, thereby adding an additional layer of oversight and accountability
[32].
Furthermore, the future might see a more collaborative approach between AI and human
recruiters. Instead of viewing AI as a replacement for human judgment, organizations could
adopt a symbiotic model where AI handles large-scale data processing and pattern recognition,
while humans bring their nuanced understanding, emotional intelligence, and ethical
considerations to the table. Such a model recognizes the strengths and limitations of both AI
and humans, aiming for a holistic recruitment process that is both efficient and fair [33].
However, according to Chen [31], the journey towards this ideal future is not without
challenges. One of the primary concerns is the potential for AI to become a mere tokenistic tool
for diversity. Organizations might be tempted to use AI as a way to "tick the diversity box"
without genuinely engaging with the deeper issues of inclusion and equity. For AI to truly
contribute to diverse recruiting, it must be part of a broader organizational commitment to these
values, rather than a standalone solution.
Moreover, as AI tools become more sophisticated, there's a risk of over-reliance on
technology. While AI can offer valuable insights and streamline certain processes, the human
element in recruitment – the personal connections, the understanding of cultural nuances, the
ethical considerations – remains irreplaceable. Striking the right balance between leveraging
AI and retaining the human touch will be a critical challenge for the future (Pena et al., 2020).
Another concern is the potential for economic disparities to influence the development
and deployment of AI tools. Larger organizations with more resources might have access to
advanced AI solutions, potentially giving them an edge in diverse recruiting. In contrast, smaller
entities might struggle to keep up, leading to a potential widening of the diversity gap between
large and small organizations. Addressing this disparity will require concerted efforts from

0114
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

industry bodies, policymakers, and AI developers to ensure that the benefits of AI in recruitment
are accessible to all [30].

CONCLUSION

The recruitment paradigm has undergone a significant transformation due to

technological advancements and the widespread adoption of remote work. This shift has
brought about various opportunities and challenges for contemporary businesses. Digital
platforms and tools have played a significant role in democratising access to global talent. This
has allowed organisations to effectively source the most qualified candidates from various
geographical locations. However, the increasing amount of data and the requirement for
impartial decision-making have heightened the demand for creative solutions.
The emergence of AI-driven recruitment processes presents a promising solution to the
challenges faced in this domain. These processes offer the potential for increased efficiency,
scalability, and fairness. In anticipation of forthcoming developments, it is crucial for
organisations to effectively incorporate artificial intelligence (AI) into their recruitment
strategies. This integration should go beyond mere automation and instead position AI as a
strategic collaborator capable of augmenting human judgement and intuition. The integration
of human and machine capabilities in the hiring process not only enhances efficiency but also
maintains the alignment of talent acquisition with an organization's core principles and long-
term objectives.

REFERENCES

[1] Cletus, H. E., Mahmood, N. A., Umar, A., & Ibrahim, A. D. Prospects and challenges of
workplace diversity in modern day organizations: A critical review. HOLISTICA–Journal of
Business and Public Administration. 2018; 9(2): 35-52. https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2018-
0011
[2] Adeosun, O. T., & Ohiani, A. S. Attracting and recruiting quality talent: firm
perspectives. Rajagiri Management Journal. 2020; 14(2): 107-120.
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAMJ-05-2020-0016
[3] Mishra, S., & Kumar, S. P. E-recruitment and training comprehensiveness: untapped
antecedents of employer branding. Industrial and commercial training. 2023; 51(2): 125-136.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-12-2017-0106
[4] Albert, E. T. AI in talent acquisition: a review of AI-applications used in recruitment and

0115
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

selection. Strategic HR Review. 2019; 18(5): 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-04-2019-

0024
[5] Umachandran, K. Application of artificial intelligence for recruitment in manufacturing
industries. Journal of Emerging Technologies. 2021; 1(1): 11-18.
https://doi.org/10.57040/jet.v1i1.39
[6] Moon, K. K., & Christensen, R. K. Realizing the performance benefits of workforce
diversity in the US federal government: The moderating role of diversity climate. Public
Personnel Management. 2020; 49(1): 141-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026019848458
[7] Goldhaber, D., Theobald, R., & Tien, C. Why we need a diverse teacher workforce. Phi
Delta Kappan. 2019; 100(5): 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721719827540
[8] Cooke, D. T., Olive, J., Godoy, L., Preventza, O., Mathisen, D. J., & Prager, R. L. The
importance of a diverse specialty: introducing the STS workforce on diversity and
inclusion. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2019; 108(4): 1000-1005.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.07.007
[9] Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. Getting serious about diversity. Harvard Business
Review. 2020; 98(6): 114-122.
[10] Lee, H. W., & Kim, E. Workforce diversity and firm performance: Relational
coordination as a mediator and structural empowerment and multisource feedback as
moderators. Human Resource Management. 2020; 59(1): 5-23.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21970
[11] Hunt, V., Prince, S., Dixon-Fyle, S., & Yee, L. Delivering through diversity. McKinsey
& Company; 2018. 231: 1-39.
[12] Tomislav, K. The concept of sustainable development: From its beginning to the
contemporary issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business. 2018; 21(1): 67-
94. https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2018-0005
[13] Certo, S. C., & Certo, S. T. Modern management: Concepts and skills. Pearson; 2019.
[14] Tunn, V. S., Bocken, N. M., van den Hende, E. A., & Schoormans, J. P. Business models
for sustainable consumption in the circular economy: An expert study. Journal of cleaner
production. 2019; 212: 324-333.
[15] Roselli, D., Matthews, J., & Talagala, N. Managing bias in AI. In Companion
Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference. 2019; pp. 539-544.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3308560.3317590
[16] Chichester Jr, M. A., & Giffen, J. R. Recruiting in the robot age: examining potential

0116
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

EEO implications in optimizing recruiting through the use of artificial intelligence. Comput.
Internet Lawyer. 2019; 36(10): 1-3.
[17] Varsha, P. S. How can we manage biases in artificial intelligence systems–A systematic
literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights. 2023; 3(1):
100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100165
[18] Nadeem, A., Marjanovic, O., & Abedin, B. Gender bias in AI: Implications for
managerial practices. In Responsible AI and Analytics for an Ethical and Inclusive Digitized
Society: 20th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, I3E 2021,
Galway, Ireland, September 1–3, 2021, Proceedings 20. 2021; pp. 259-270. Springer
International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_23
[19] Eitel-Porter, R. Beyond the promise: implementing ethical AI. AI and Ethics. 2021; 1:
73-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00011-6
[20] Peng, A., Nushi, B., Kiciman, E., Inkpen, K., & Kamar, E. Investigations of performance
and bias in human-AI teamwork in hiring. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial
Intelligence. 2022; 36(11): 12089-12097). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21468
[21] Kassir, S., Baker, L., Dolphin, J., & Polli, F. AI for hiring in context: a perspective on
overcoming the unique challenges of employment research to mitigate disparate impact. AI and
Ethics. 2023; 3(3): 845-868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00208-x
[22] Shneiderman, B. Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: guidelines for reliable,
safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent
Systems (TiiS). 2020; 10(4): 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419764
[23] Hunkenschroer, A. L., & Luetge, C. Ethics of AI-enabled recruiting and selection: A
review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022; 178(4): 977-1007.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05049-6
[24] Liang, W., Tadesse, G. A., Ho, D., Fei-Fei, L., Zaharia, M., Zhang, C., & Zou, J. ().
Advances, challenges and opportunities in creating data for trustworthy AI. Nature Machine
Intelligence. 2022; 4(8): 669-677. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00516-1
[25] Kuhlman, C., Jackson, L., & Chunara, R. No computation without representation:
Avoiding data and algorithm biases through diversity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.11836.
2020; https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.11836
[26] Mitić, V. Benefits of artificial intelligence and machine learning in marketing. In Sinteza
2019-International scientific conference on information technology and data related
research. 2019; pp. 472-477. Singidunum University. https://doi.org/10.15308/Sinteza-2019-

0117
 Информатика. Экономика. Управление// 2023; 2(4)
Informatics, Economics, Management http://oajiem.com/

472-477
[27] Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. Concrete
problems in AI safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565. 2016.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.06565
[28] Gonzalez, M. F., Capman, J. F., Oswald, F. L., Theys, E. R., & Tomczak, D. L. “Where’s
the IO?” Artificial intelligence and machine learning in talent management systems. Personnel
Assessment and Decisions. 2019; 5(3): 5. https://doi.org/10.25035/pad.2019.03.005
[29] Chung, K., Le, D., Thaichon, P., & Quach, S. Types of artificial intelligence (AI) in
marketing management. Artificial Intelligence for Marketing Management; 2022.
[30] Ochmann, J., & Laumer, S. Fairness as a determinant of AI adoption in recruiting: An
interview-based study; 2019.
[31] Chen, Z. Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment
practices. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023; 10(1): 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02079-x
[32] Upadhyay, A. K., & Khandelwal, K. Applying artificial intelligence: implications for
recruitment. Strategic HR Review. 2018; 17(5): 255-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-07-
2018-0051
[33] Pena, A., Serna, I., Morales, A., & Fierrez, J. Bias in multimodal AI: Testbed for fair
automatic recruitment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition Workshops; 2020: 28-29.

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОБ АВТОРАХ / INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Ramakrishnan Vivek, Research Student at Catholic University of Eichstatt-Ingolstadt (KU),
Eichstätt & Ingolstadt, Bavaria, Germany

Статья поступила в редакцию 10.10.2023; одобрена после рецензирования 17.10.2023; принята

к публикации 19.10.2023.
The article was submitted 10.10.2023; approved after reviewing 17.10.2023; accepted for publication
19.10.2023.

0118

View publication stats