(Spring 2013) Experiment #7 - Thevenin and Max Power Transfer
(Spring 2013) Experiment #7 - Thevenin and Max Power Transfer
Lab Report
Section: B54
Submitted by:
Asma Hegazy-201001849
1
Thevenin and Maximum Power Transfer Theorem
Abstract: The objective of this lab is to verify Thevenin’s theorem and the
Maximum Power Transfer Theorem.
Equipment used: Breadboard, power supply, DMM and resistors and decade
resistance box.
Theory: Thevenin’s theorem states that it is possible to simplify any linear circuit
to an equivalent with a single voltage source and series resistance connected to a
load.
Any linear one-port network can be replaced with a single voltage source,
called the Thevenin’s equivalent voltage and a single resistor called the
Thevenin’s equivalent resistance.
2
Procedure:
1. The circuit shown in Figure 1 was constructed using MultiSim. The current
through the load resistor, IL was recorded
2. We then measured the values of the resistors given to us using a DMM. The
results are shown in Table 1.
3. The same circuit was then constructed on the breadboard and IL was
measured.
4. To measure RTH, we short the voltage source and then use a DMM as an
ohmmeter as shown in Figure 2.
5. The load resistor was then removed and replaced with a DMM to measure
the open circuit voltage, VTH.
6. These values of RTH and VTH were used to construct a Thevenin equivalent
circuit by setting the power supply voltage to VTH and the decade resistance
box to RTH.
7. Theoretical and measured voltages and currents were compared using the
formula shown below: Results of % errors are shown in Table 2.
1) In the circuit for part A, we replaced the 390Ω resistor with another decade
resistance box to vary the value of RL.
2) RL was changed from 500Ω to 6000Ω and the corresponding values of VL
were measured. PL was then calculated and the values were recorded in
Table 3.
3
Figure 1: the circuit constructed in MultiSim
4
Data obtained:
5
Conclusion:
As the table shows, the values of currents and voltages obtained experimentally
were slightly different from the theoretical ones, as shown by the percentage
errors. This could have been due to the following reasons:
6
2. Graph of PL vs RL