0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views2 pages

DG Errata

Uploaded by

Shibo Liu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views2 pages

DG Errata

Uploaded by

Shibo Liu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Errata for

Differential Geometry: Connections, Curvature, and


Characteristic Classes
Loring W. Tu
April 1, 2024

• p. 14, Problem 2.4, second display: (f ′ (x))2


• p. 24, last display: DZ < X, Y > should be Z < X, Y >.
• p. 30, line 1: on → along
• p. 40, Problem 5.4: Need to assume that the Gauss map is one-to-one and the Gaussian curvature K
is of one sign (either ≥ 0 or ≤ 0) on M .
• p. 62, (8.5): The second term −⟨L(X), Z⟩L(X) should be −⟨L(Y ), Z⟩L(X).
• p. 62, last display: R(X, Y ) should be R(X, Y )Z
• p. 67, second equation in the last dispay: (∇X Y )nor should be (DX Z)nor .
• p. 67, last line: E should be M .
• p. 69, first display: R(X, Y ) should be R(X, Y )Z.
• p. 81, Section 11.2, second paragraph: “X, Y ∈ X(U )” should be “X ∈ X(U ), Y ∈ Γ(U, E)”.
• p. 105, Prop. 14.5: Replace “manifold with a connection” with “Riemannian manifold”.
• p. 140, below Equation (17.2): c(t) should be γ(s).
• p. 140, the first line of Proposition 17.2: “an affine connection” should be “the Riemannian connection”
(because the connection should be compatible with the metric in order to use Proposition 11.4 in the
proof).
• p. 141, line 1: ei,c(t) and Dei,c(t) /ds should be ei,γ(s) and Dei,γ(s) /ds, respectively.
Vn Vn
• p. 167, the first line of the proof of Lemma 19.7: V → V should be V →R

• p. 179, second display: f ∗ (E|Uα ) = (f ∗ E)|f −1 (Uα ) −
→ f −1 (Uα ) × V
• p. 189, the second paragraph of the proof of Proposition 21.1: “To show that α ∧ β is smooth” should
be “To show that α · β is smooth.”
• p. 199, line after second display: Replace “this may be an infinite sum” by “the Betti numbers bi may
be infinite”.
• p. 200, second display: bi = bn−i should be bi = bn−i .
• p. 205, bottom display: In the second term, R(X, W )Y should be R(Z, W )Y .
• p. 209, Section 22.8, first display: Tp M × Tp M → Tp M should be Tp M × Tp M → R.
• p. 212, lines 7–8: this global form P (Ω) is closed and its cohomology class is independent of the
connection.

1
• p. 221, second display: The two vertical arrows should be pointing up instead of down.
• p. 235, Section 25.8: “As before, one shows that [Q(Ω)] is closed and ...” should be “As before, one
shows that Q(Ω) is closed and ...”
• p. 266, Proposition 29.6, second line: Replace “a manifold M of dimension n” by “a manifold M of
dimension n, and let π : Fr(E) → M be its frame bundle”.
• p. 279, below Example 31.10: Ω0p (P, V ) should be Ω0ρ (P, V ).

• p. 289, proof of (ii) and (iii): The sentence starting with “Since the Ωi are right-equivariant . . .” is
incorrect so that the rest of the proof is invalid. One way to fix this is to follow Kobayashi and Nomizu
[12 in the References], vol. 2, p. 295, by first showing that there is a one-to-one correspondence between
degree n homogeneous polynomials and n-multilinear functions and then continuing with their proof.
• p. 303, line after first display: Tp M should be Tp N .
• p. 322, solution 2.5: the denominator should have an exponent 3/2.

• p. 322, last line: dNc(t) /dt should be Nc(t) .


• p. 324, line -3: 2ÿ should be ÿ.

You might also like