Scribd
Upload
14 views30 pages

13 ChatGPT Slides

Uploaded by

Vignesh A K
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
14 views30 pages

13 ChatGPT Slides

Uploaded by

Vignesh A K
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 30

Adapted from https://www.tooltester.com/en/blog/chatgpt-statistics/; viewed 03.10.

2024
Suppl. Table 2 from Fecher et al. (2023). Friend or Foe? Exploring the Implications of Large Language Models on the Science System.
For what do you use it?
Policy and discussion in Science March 2023

No ChatGPT in writing manuscript!

But it can be useful in certain contexts,


e.g. improving English for non-native
writers.

Indeed, but we need rules and a


consensus in the science community. No
use until we have them.
Current AI-policy for all Science journals
General policies
• Authorship
• Conflict of Interest
• Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
• Image and Text Integrity
• Plagiarism
• Artificial Intelligence (AI)
• Images
• Prior Publication and Presentations at Meetings
• Unpublished Data and Personal Communications
• ...
Research Standards
• …
Publication Policies
• …
DFG Guidelines (Sept 2023)
“In view of its considerable opportunities and development potential,
the use of generative models in the context of research work should by
no means be ruled out.”

However, certain binding framework conditions will be required in


order to ensure good research practice and the quality of research
results: […]

Please read the PDF with the full guidelines. What concrete do‘s and dont‘s do you find?
UoT: Guidelines for using generative AI tools

„Thirdly, all members of the University are exhorted to use GenAI responsibly
in line with good scientific practice. Among other things this means that
when working with GenAI it is the individual responsibility of the authors to
ensure that their texts do not contain any plagiarism and all sources are
critically examined.“
Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Assessment Contexts

• „It must also be made clear that students are ultimately responsible for
their own work.“
• „[…] it must be clearly communicated to students whether and, if so, how
generative AI may be used in studies and assessments and how this must
be indicated.“
• Particularly problematic are „Unsupervised written assessments such as
seminar papers, open book exams, Bachelor's and Master's theses, but
also laboratory reports, etc.”
AI in unsupervised written assessments

• Literature search
• Text revisions/editing
• Translations
• Writing new text
Literature and information search
• Just another tool to find relevant material.
• Unproblematic.
• Resources provided by the university library.
• Be aware of ‘hallucinations’!
• Check the sources!
Revising your text with AI tools
• Each submission (report, thesis) is a written assessment. The
writing must be yours.
• Greyish!
• Depends on how much has been revised.
• Not a new problem. Revisions are often being made by:
• Supervisors.
• Peers.
• Word.
• Tools like Grammarly etc.
• Is your personal, original contribution still predominant?
Revising your text with AI tools

Be transparent in acknowledgments:
“The text in chapters 1, 2, 3 has been revised upon feedback from my
fellow student Olaf Oberschlau and my supervisor Petra Professor.”
“The abstract/text/chapter has been revised using ChatGPT4.0. Please
find the prompt history in appendix XY.”
Translating your text with AI tools

• Each submission (report, thesis) is a written assessment. The writing


must be yours.
• Program language is English.
• Greyish!
• Full translations of large text sections or even a full report/thesis
text are a no-go. It is not your text anymore.
• Translating sentences, short sections, improving your language …
akin to “revision”.
• Be transparent in acknowledgments.
Writing new text with AI tools

• No-go!
• This is not your text.
• Extreme example:
• Upload your papers to ChatGPT. (Be careful: copyrights!)
• Let ChatGPT4o write the synopsis.
• If you transparently declare this, we cannot accept this synopsis.
• If you hide it, it is a case of ghostwriting: scientific fraud!
Writing new text with AI tools

If, for whatever reasons that I cannot see here and now, you include
text fully written by ChatGPT or similar tools, you label it as you would
label citations and provide the prompt history.
AI-written text can be detected post-hoc
• Typical AI-style.
AI-written text can be detected post-hoc
• Typical AI-style.
AI-written text can be detected
• Typical AI-style.
• Inconsistencies with your known style and skills of writing.
• Inconsistency with your style and expressions in oral
interactions/examinations.

There have been first cases of fraud in (e.g. university exams,


application documents) that have been decided based on the
accumulation of evidence.
Personal example from last year‘s scholarly course, developing a
new project in conversation with GPT-4:
Please identify three follow-up research questions using fMRI in
humans based on the following abstract: "The superior colliculus
(SC) plays a major role in orienting movements of eyes and the head
and in the allocation of attention. Functions of the SC […].
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02218-z
• Groups of 8.
• Use scholarly2024open.
• Experience/expertise in your group?
• List usage cases/tools.
• Share.
• Leave notes and tips about tools.
• Short presentation by each group.

You might also like