EET90020180202
EET90020180202
EET90020180202
DATE: Friday, 2nd February, 2018 TIME: 9.00 a.m. - 12.00 p.m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INSTRUCTIONS: Answer ALL questions.
Question One
Question Two
When solving optimization problems, one is likely to encounter challenges dealing with
technology represented by a production function which is not differentiable. Using Kuhn Tucker
Theorem, solve the following optimization problems.
1. Given a production function as y = 3x, + 5x2, obtain the corresponding ordinary input
demand functions and the cost function. (15 marks)
ll. Consider a firm with two plants each with cost functions ci (YI) = 10YI and c2 (Y2) = Y; such
thaty = YI + Y2' and fixed factor prices. Derive the firm's cost function. (10 marks)
Question Three
(a) Let X = R;. Verify that X satisfies all five properties required of a consumption set.
(2 marks)
(b) A consumer has lexicographic preferences over x E R;
if the relatiori c satisfies x I ?:: X2
W henever
enever x.
XI = XIx.' ' or
e = XI2d2an
x2 ~ x22 •
XI I
(i) Sketch an indifference map for these preferences. (2 marks)
Page 1 of3
IN VOLVEMENT IN ANY EXAMINA TION IRREGULARITY SHALL LEAD TO DISCONTINUATION
(ii) Can these preferences be represented by a continuous utility function? Why or why not?
(1 mark)
11
(c) Suppose u(x) = If;(xJ is strictly quasiconcave with J;'(xi) for all i. The consumer
faces fixed prices p » 0 and has income y> O. Assume x(p, y»> o.
(i) Show that if one good displays increasing marginal utility at x(p, y), all other goods
must display diminishing marginal utility there. (1 mark)
(ii) Prove that if one good displays increasing marginal utility and all others diminishing
marginal utility at x(p, y), then one good is normal and all other goods are inferior.
(1 mark)
(iii) (iii) Show that if all goods display diminishing marginal utility at x(p, y), then all
goods are normal. (1 mark)
(d) Consider a situation with two producers, A and B. Producer A has a production function
X = 0.4L025 where X is output and L the input of labour. Let Xp be the price of X; and W
be the wage of labour. Producer B buys X and produces Y from it with a production
function Y = X05. The price of Y is Y p. The markets for Yand L are assumed to be
competitive. Producer B acts as a competitor in the market for X Required:
i) Derive the equilibrium values of L, X and Y. (2 marks)
ii) How do L, X and Y change as W, Xp and Yp change? (2 marks)
(e) Suppose initially a consumer has an income mO =100 and faces the following prices of good
xi and X2: p~ = p~ = 1 . If the government imposes a tax on the good XI so that PI rises to
Page 2 of3
INVOLVEMENT IN ANY EXAMINA TION IRREGULARITY SHALL LEAD TO DISCONTINUATION
We write Xa, x., Xg ~ 0 for the amounts of his consumption of' 'nduma"; toothpicks, and
gifts, respectively. We assume for simplicity that these goods are infinitesimally divisible.
(i) Use the Kuhn-Tucker approach to derive step-by-step the Walrasian demand function
x(p;w). Verify also second-order conditions. (2 marks)
(ii) To be honest, we do not really know whether Ali has the Cobb-Douglas utility function
stated above. Would Ali want to differently substitute a marginal amount of' 'nduma" for
some toothpicks when having a differentiable utility function different from the one above
and optimally demanding positive amounts of all goods? Explain. (1 mark)
(iii) You would expect that the more' 'nduma" Ali eats, the more they get stuck in his teeth and
the more toothpicks he purchases. In light of such considerations, does it make sense to
assume Ali has the utility function above? Explain. (1 mark)
(iv) Derive Ali's indirect utility' function (denote it by v(p;w»). (2 marks)
(v) Verify that Ali satisfies Roy's identity with respect to' 'nduma": (1 mark)
(vi) When Professor Yakuu interviews Ali about how exactly he arrives at his optimal
consumption bundle, Ali expresses ignorance about maximizing utility subject to his
budget constraint. Instead, he seems to minimize his expenditure on consumption such that
he reaches a certain level of utility. A smart undergraduate student walks by and claims that
this is clear evidence against the assumption of utility maximization in economics. Since
Professor Yakuu hates Cobb-Douglas utility functions and boring calculations, he sends the
student to you so that you can show him how expenditure minimization works. Again, use
the Kuhn-Tucker approach to derive the Hicksian demand function. (2 marks)
(vii) Derive the expenditure function. Show that the expenditure function is homogeneous of
degree 1 in prices, strictly increasing in it as well as nondecreasing and concave in the
price of each good. (2 marks)
(viii) Professor Yakuu cannot compute the Hicksian demand using Kuhn-Tucker without a cup
of tea. Unfortunately, Ali has no cup of tea to offer. Yet, he could offer Professor Yakuu
his expenditure function. Is there a way to quickly calculate the Hicksian demand from the
expenditure function without cup of tea? (1 mark)
(ix) Verify the (own price) Slutsky equation for the example of ' 'nduma": Which term in the
(own price) Slutsky equation refers to the substitution effect? (1 mark)
(x) Because of the drought, the price of' 'nduma" changes from. The campus is committed to
keep Ali as well off as before the price change. The newly campus management turns to
Professor Yakuu for advice on the exact amount to be deducted from the budget of the
university and paid to Ali as compensation for the price change. Unfortunately, Professor
Yakuu is so immersed in exciting new research that he is extremely slow in answering his
email. Luckily, the Senior university administrator requests the university calculate the
amount. (2 marks)
Page 3 of3
INVOLVEMENT IN ANY EXAMINA TION IRREGULARITY SHALL LEAD TO DISCONTINUATION