Nuclear Matter Theory 1st Edition Omar Benhar (Author) All Chapters Instant Download
Nuclear Matter Theory 1st Edition Omar Benhar (Author) All Chapters Instant Download
Nuclear Matter Theory 1st Edition Omar Benhar (Author) All Chapters Instant Download
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/nuclear-matter-theory-1st-
edition-omar-benhar-author/
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWNLOAD NOW
https://textbookfull.com/product/string-theory-methods-for-condensed-
matter-physics-1st-edition-horatiu-nastase/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/american-war-1st-edition-omar-el-
akkad/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/allah-loves-omar-suleiman/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/quantum-field-theory-approach-to-
condensed-matter-physics-1st-edition-eduardo-c-marino/
textboxfull.com
Blandy's Urology 3rd Edition Omar M. Aboumarzouk
https://textbookfull.com/product/blandys-urology-3rd-edition-omar-m-
aboumarzouk/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/how-matter-becomes-conscious-a-
naturalistic-theory-of-the-mind-jan-faye/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-new-development-at-the-
intersection-of-nuclear-structure-and-reaction-theory-steven-
karataglidis/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-consequences-of-american-nuclear-
disarmament-strategy-and-nuclear-weapons-1st-edition-christine-m-leah-
auth/
textboxfull.com
Nuclear Matter Theory
Nuclear Matter Theory
Omar Benhar
Stefano Fantoni
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been
made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity
of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright
holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this
form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may
rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized
in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying,
microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the
publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com
(http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers,
MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of
users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been
arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Preface ix
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 NUCLEAR MATTER IN ATOMIC NUCLEI 1
1.2 NUCLEAR MATTER IN NEUTRON STARS 5
v
vi Contents
Outlook 135
Bibliography 142
Index 155
Preface
ix
x Preface
Alessandro Lovato, who also contributed several figures, Kevin Schmidt, Francesco Pederiva,
Sergio Rosati, and Artur Polls.
Finally, we would like to acknowledge how much we are indebted to the work of our
late friends and collaborators Adelchi Fabrocini and Vijay R. Pandharipande, who gave
fundamental and lasting contributions to the development of nuclear matter theory.
Throughout the book, we use a natural system of units, in which ~ = c = 1, and the
symbol % denotes both the nucleon density, that is, the number of nucleons per fm3 , and
the matter density, generally expressed in units of g cm−3 .
INTRODUCTION
The concept of nuclear matter, which naturally emerges from the systematic analysis of
observed nuclear properties, provides the foundation for the development of a unified theo-
retical framework, that can be used to model both atomic nuclei and the interior of neutron
stars. In this chapter, we briefly outline the basis of the liquid drop model, according to
which the nucleus can be described as an incompressible fluid, as well as the extension of this
treatment to neutron star matter, whose structure and dynamics will be further discussed
in Chapter 6.
that nuclei are nearly incompressible, that is, that nuclear forces become strongly repulsive
at short distances. This feature, referred to as saturation of nuclear densities, is illustrated
in Fig. 1.2, showing the radial dependence of the charge-densities of nuclei ranging from
oxygen (A = 16) to lead (A = 208). The analysis of the available data also shows that
the nuclear radius is simply related to the mass number, A, through RA = R0 A1/3 , with
R0 ≈ 1.2 fm.
1 Electron scattering experiments actually measure charge form factors, whose relation to the charge-
density distribution is frame dependent. The results shown in this volume have been obtained in the so-called
Breit frame.
1
2 Nuclear Matter Theory
Figure 1.1 Mass dependence of the nuclear binding energy of stable nuclei, defined as in Eq. (1.1).
The main features emerging from the systematics of the nuclear binding energies and
charge-density distributions point to a remarkable similarity between nuclear forces and
the intermolecular forces determining the structure of a liquid drop, whose energy can be
written in the form2
with N , R ∝ N 1/3 and τ being the number of molecules, the drop radius, and the surface
tension of the liquid, respectively. From the above equation, it folllows that the binding
energy per molecule depends on N according to
B E 1
= − = α − β 1/3 . (1.3)
N N N
The liquid drop analogy suggests that an expression similar to Eq. (1.3) may be used
to describe the nuclear binding energy. Unlike molecules, however, protons are charged
particles, and Coulomb forces must be taken into account.
Recalling that the potential energy associated with a charge Q confined to a spherical
volume of radius R is ∝ Q2 /R, and that Coulomb interactions between protons are repulsive,
their contribution to the binding energy can be written in the form
Z2
BC = −γ , (1.4)
A1/3
2 Throughout this volume, we will denote by N the number of particles in a generic many-body system,
e.g. a molecule, and by A the number of nucleons in a nucleus, or, by extension, in nuclear matter.
INTRODUCTION 3
Figure 1.2 Radial dependence of the charge-density distributions of nuclei, normalised to the nu-
clear mass number A. The dashed horizontal line corresponds to the value %0 = 0.16 fm−3 .
(N − Z)2 (A − 2Z)2
BS = −δ = −δ , (1.5)
A A
with δ > 0.
Finally, the empirical evidence that nuclei with even numbers of protons and neutrons
are energetically favoured can be accounted for with the inclusion of a term
1
BP = − , (1.6)
A1/2
where = ±0 and 0 > 0. The plus and minus signs apply, respectively, to the cases of odd
or even values of both N and Z, corresponding to even A, while for odd A = 0.
Collecting all the above contributions, the nuclear binding energy per nucleon can be
cast in the form,
B(A, Z) 1 Z2 (A − 2Z)2 1
= α − β 1/3 − γ 4/3 − δ 2
− 3/2 , (1.7)
A A A A A
4 Nuclear Matter Theory
known as von Weitzäker semi empirical mass formula [2]. By properly adjusting the val-
ues of the five parameters involved, the above expression provides a remarkably accurate
description of the data shown in Fig. 1.1, except for the few points corresponding to the
spikes at low A. The liquid drop model largely explains the observed pattern of stable nuclei,
illustrated in Fig. 1.3, and provides accurate predictions of the energy released in fission
reactions, in which a nucleus of mass number A breaks down into two nuclei of smaller
masses.
Figure 1.3 Chart of the nuclides. The black squares represent stable nuclei as a function of their
charge Z and neutron number N = A − Z.
In the A → ∞ limit, Eq. (1.7) can be employed to obtain the binding energy per nucleon
of nuclear matter, defined as a uniform system consisting of infinite numbers of protons and
neutrons subject to strong interactions only. In the case of isospin-symmetric matter, with
N = Z, one finds
B(A, Z) E0 MeV
=− = α ≈ 16 , (1.8)
A A A
where E0 can be identified as the ground-state energy of the system. The corresponding den-
sity, %0 , can be inferred from the charge-density distributions shown in Fig. 1.2, suggesting
that
A
%0 = lim %ch (r = 0) = 0.16 fm−3 , (1.9)
A→∞ Z
with A/Z = 2.
INTRODUCTION 5
corresponding to a density ∼ 1015 g/cm3 , it is expected that, if the density of the neutron
star core reaches this value, matter undergoes a transition to a new phase, predicted by
the fundamental theory of strong interactions, in which quarks are no longer clustered into
nucleons or hadrons.
CHAPTER 2
NUCLEAR DYNAMICS
While Quantum Chromo-Dynamics, or QCD, has been long recognised as the fundamental
theory of strong interactions, its applications are largely limited to the high-energy regime,
in which the elementary degrees of freedom of the theory manifest themselves, and their
interactions can be treated in perturbation theory. At lower energy, on the other hand, QCD
becomes non perturbative, and the fundamental approach is based on lattice calculations
involving non trivial difficulties.
In this chapter, we review a more phenomenological approach, in which nucleons are
treated as effective degrees of freedom, whose interactions are described within models
constrained by the available data.
In the above equation, pi and m denote the momentum of the i-th nucleon and its mass,
while the potentials vij and Vijk account for two- and three-nucleon interactions, respec-
tively. Note that the potentials have a non trivial operator structure, involving a dependence
on the discrete quantum numbers specifying the state of the interacting particles.
Before analysing the main features of the potentials appearing in Eq.(2.1), a critical
discussion of the tenet underlying the paradigm of nuclear many-body theory is in order.
Clearly, the assumption that protons and neutrons can be described as point-like parti-
cles needs to be reconciled with the observation that nucleons have in fact finite size. The
nucleon radius can be inferred from the proton charge distribution, measured by elastic
electron scattering on hydrogen. The value resulting from a state-of-the-art analysis of the
2 1/2
data turns out to be hrch i = 0.887 ± 0.012 fm [7].
Figure 2.1 shows the charge-density profiles of two protons separated by a distance
d = 1.6 fm (upper panel) and 1.0 fm (lower panel), computed using the parametrisation of
the measured proton from factors of Bradford et al [8]. It is apparent that at d = 1.6 fm—the
average nucleon-nucleon (NN) separation distance in nuclei such as carbon or oxygen—the
overlap is marginal, and the point-like approximation is expected to be applicable. On the
7
8 Nuclear Matter Theory
other hand, the lower panel suggests that at shorter separation distance, corresponding to
higher nucleon density, the description based on nuclear many-body theory may become
inadequate.
Figure 2.1 The solid lines show the charge-density distributions of two protons separated by a
distance d = 1.6 fm (upper panel) and 1.0 fm (lower panel). The sum of the two distribution is
represented by the diamonds.
The validity of the description in terms of nucleons down to distances of the order of
1 fm is also supported by electron-nucleus scattering data. The observation of y-scaling in
experiments performed using a variety of targets, ranging from 2 H to nuclei as heavy as
197
Au, unambiguously shows that at momentum transfer & 1 GeV and negative y the beam
particles couple to nucleons, carrying momenta up to ∼ 700 MeV [9].
• The observation that the binding energy per nucleon of a nucleus of mass number A
and charge Z, defined as in Eq.(1.1), is nearly constant for all nuclei with A ≥ 20
indicates that nuclear forces have finite range r0 , i.e. that
v(rij ) = 0 , rij > r0 , (2.3)
with r0 RA .
• The spectra of the so called mirror nuclei, i.e. pairs of nuclei having the same mass
number A and charges differing by one unit, exhibit striking similarities1 . The obser-
vation that the energies of the levels with the same parity and angular momentum are
the same, up to small electromagnetic corrections, suggests that protons and neutrons
have similar nuclear interactions, i.e that nuclear forces are charge symmetric.
Charge symmetry is the manifestation of a more general property of nuclear forces,
referred to as isotopic invariance. Neglecting the ∼ 0.1% mass difference, proton and neutron
can be viewed as two states of the same particle, the nucleon (N), labeled by a quantum
number dubbed isospin.
A nucleon in vacuum can be described by the Dirac equation obtained from the La-
grangian density
L = ψ̄N i∂/ − m ψN , (2.4)
where
φp
ψN = , (2.5)
φn
φp and φn being the four-component spinors associated with the proton and the neu-
tron, respectively. In Eq. (2.4), ∂/ = γµ ∂ µ , where γµ denotes a Dirac gamma matrix, and
m ≈ 939 MeV is the nucleon mass.
The Lagrangian density (2.4) is invariant under the SU(2) global phase transformation
U = eiαj τj , (2.6)
where the αj (j = 1, 2, 3) are constants, independent of the coordinate x, and the τj are
Pauli matrices acting in isospin space.
The above equations show that the nucleon is described by a isospin doublet, with proton
and neutron corresponding to isospin projections +1/2 and −1/2, respectively. Proton-
proton and neutron-neutron pairs always have total isospin T = 1, whereas a proton-neutron
pair may have either T = 0 or T = 1. The two-nucleon isospin states |T, T3 i can be specified
as follows
1
|1, 1i = |ppi , |1, 0i = √ (|pni + |npi) , |1, −1i = |nni ,
2
1
|0, 0i = √ (|pni − |npi) .
2
Isospin invariance implies that the interaction between two nucleons separated by a distance
r and having total spin S depends on their total isospin T , but not on the projection T3 .
For example, the potential v(r) acting between two protons, or two neutrons, with spins
coupled to S = 0 is the same as the potential acting between a proton and a neutron with
spins and isospins coupled to S = 0 and T = 1.
1 The number of protons in a nucleus belonging to a mirror pair is the same as the number of neutrons
in its companion. For example, 157 N (A = 15, Z = 7) and 158 O (A = 15, Z = 8) are mirror nuclei.
10 Nuclear Matter Theory
N1′ N2′
N1 N2
Figure 2.2 Feynman diagram describing the one-pion-exchange process in NN scattering. The cor-
responding amplitude is given by Eq. (2.8).
be regarded as an isospin T = 1 triplet, the charge states being associated with isospin
projections T3 = + 1, 0 and − 1, respectively2 .
The simplest π-nucleon coupling compatible with the observation that nuclear inter-
actions conserve parity has the pseudoscalar form igγ 5 τ , where γ 5 = iγ 0 γ 1 γ 2 γ 3 , g is the
coupling constant and the operator τ describes the isospin of the nucleon. With this choice
of the interaction vertex, the invariant amplitude of the process depicted in Fig. 2.2 can be
readily written, using standard Feynman’s diagram techniques, as
ū(p02 , s02 )γ5 u(p2 , s2 )ū(p01 , s01 )γ5 u(p1 , s1 )
M = −ig 2 hτ 1 · τ 2 i , (2.8)
k 2 − m2π
where k = p01 − p1 = p2 − p02 , k 2 = kµ k µ = k02 − k2 , and u(p, p s) is the Dirac spinor associated
with a nucleon of four-momentum p ≡ (E, p), with E= p2 + m2 , and spin projection s.
Finally
† †
hτ 1 · τ 2 i = (η20 τ η2 ) · (η10 τ η1 ) , (2.9)
ηi being the two-component Pauli spinor describing the isospin state of nucleon i.
In the non relativistic limit, Yukawa’s theory leads to define the one-pion-exchange
(OPE) potential, that can be written in coordinate space in the form
g 2 mπ e−x
vπ = 2
(τ 1 · τ 2 )(σ 1 · ∇)(σ 2 · ∇) (2.10)
4 m x −x
g2 m3π 1 3 3 e
= (τ 1 · τ 2 ) (σ 1 · σ 2 ) + S12 1 + + 2
(4π)2 4m2 3 x x x
4π
− 3 (σ 1 · σ 2 )δ (3) (r) ,
mπ
where δ (3) denotes the three-dimensional δ-function, x = mπ r, the matrices σ i act in spin
space and the tensor operator
3
S12 = (σ 1 · r)(σ 2 · r) − (σ 1 · σ 2 ) , (2.11)
r2
is reminiscent of the one describing the non-central interaction between two magnetic
dipoles.
For g 2 /(4π) ≈ 14, the OPE potential provides a fairly good description of the long range
(r & 1.5 fm) component of the NN interaction, as shown by the analysis of the phase shifts
corresponding to scattering in states of high angular momentum. Owing to the presence of
a strong centrifugal barrier, in these states the probability of finding the two interacting
nucleons at small relative distance is in fact strongly suppressed.
At intermediate and short range, Eq.(2.7) suggests that more complicated processes,
involving the exchange of two pions or heavier particles—such as the ρ and ω mesons ,
whose masses are mρ = 770 MeV and mω = 782 MeV, respectively—must be taken into
consideration. Moreover, when the relative distance becomes very small—typically r . 0.5
fm—nucleons, being composite and finite in size, are expected to overlap, as illustrated in
Fig. 2.1. In this regime, NN forces should in principle be described in terms of interactions
involving the nucleon constituents—quarks and gluons—as dictated by the fundamental
theory of strong interactions.
2 The pion spin has been deduced from the balance of the reaction π + +2 H ↔ p + p. The intrinsic parity
was determined observing π − capture from the K shell of the deuterium atom, leading to the appearance
of two neutrons, π − + d → n + n.
short (medium) distance. %N coupling constant and
Figure 3 shows the central (effective central) NN poten- respectively. The ghost p
tial in the 1 S (3 S ) channel at t ! t " 6. As for r2 in
12 Nuclear Matter Theory 0 1 0 which dominates over the
Eq. (2), we take the discrete form of the Laplacian with the tances. Its significance can
nearest-neighbor
Studies aimed at deriving thepoints. E is obtained
NN potential from latticefrom the Green’s
QCD calculations sign and the magnitude o
have recently
achieved function
remarkable G# r~; E$ inwhich
progress is its
predicting a qualitative
solution features.
of the As Helmholtz
an example, Fig.large
2.3 distances, because
reports aequation
comparisonon the lattice
between [9]. By
the potentials fitting
obtained the etwave
by Ishii al. [11]function tween 1 S0 and
and the predictions
of the OPE model. However, the results of nuclear matter calculations performed using a
!#~r$ at the points r~ " #10–16; 0; 0$ and #10–16; 1; 0$ by
lattice QCD potential suggest that1 significant developments will be needed to reachthe
the ghost at large distan
we obtain 3
G#~ r; E$, E# S $ " !0:49#15$ MeV and E# S
level required to explain the empirical0 data in a fully quantitative fashion [12].
1 $ " indicate g %N '
Several comments are in
wave function at low ener
600 100 1 !asy#r$ " sin(krkr
S 0
3
S1
500 OPEP
50 600
VC(r) [MeV]
VC(r) [MeV]
400 500
300 0 400
200 300
-50 2 3
100
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
VC(r) [MeV]
0 20
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0
-20
r [fm]
-40
Figure 2.3FIG. 3 dependence
Radial (color online).
of the NNThe latticein QCD
potentials result
the singlet and of theScentral
triplet channels, obtained 2 3
by Ishii et(effective eff= 770 MeV being the ρ-
central) part of the NN potential VC #r$ [VC #r$] in the
al. [11] from lattice calculations at pion mass m π = m ρ /2, m ρ
meson mass.1 For3comparison, the solid lines show the long-range behaviour of the one-pion-exchange
S0 ( S1 ) channel for m" =m' " 0:595. The inset shows its
potential (OPEP).
enlargement. The solid lines correspond to the one-pion ex- FIG. 4 (color online).
change potential (OPEP) given in Eq. (5). channel for several different
Phenomenological potentials describing the NN interaction at all ranges can be conve-
niently written in the form 022001-3
X p
vij = v p (rij )Oij , (2.12)
p
where the functions v p only depend on the distance between the interacting particles, rij =
p
|ri −rj |, while the operators Oij account for the spin-isospin dependence of NN interactions,
as well as for the presence of non-central forces. The most important contributions to the
sum appearing in the right-hand side of Eq.(2.12) are those associated with the operators
p≤6
Oij = [1, (σ i · σ j ), Sij ] ⊗ [1, (τ i · τ j )] , (2.13)
with S12 given by Eq.(2.11). Note that the OPE potential of Eq.(2.10) can also be written
in terms of the six operators of Eq.(2.13).
State-of-the-art phenomenological models of vij , such as the Argonne v18 (AV18) po-
tential [13]—determined from an accurate fit of the NN scattering phase shifts up to
NUCLEAR DYNAMICS 13
pion production threshold, the low-energy NN scattering parameters and deuteron proper-
ties—include twelve additional terms. The operators corresponding to p = 7, . . . , 14 are
associated with the non-static components of the NN interaction, while those correspond-
ing to p = 15, . . . , 18 take into account small violations of charge symmetry. The full AV18
potential involves 40 adjustable parameters, and fits the 4301 phase shifts collected in the
Nijmegen data base with a reduced χ-square of 1.09.
A somewhat simplified interaction, referred to as Argonne v60 (AV6P) , has been con-
structed projecting the full AV18 onto the basis of the six operators of Eq. (2.13) [14].
This potential, designed for easier use in many-body calculations, reproduces the deuteron
binding energy and electric quadrupole moment with accuracy of 1% and 5%, respectively,
and provides an excellent fit of the phase shifts in the 1 S0 channel, corresponding to T = 1,
S = 0 and angular momentum ` = 0.
The energy dependence of the 1 S0 phase shifts is illustrated in Fig. 2.4. It is apparent that
the results obtained using the AV6P and AV18 potentials are nearly indistinguishable from
one another, and provide an accurate description of the data resulting from the analyses
of the Nijmengen group [15, 16] and Workman et al. [17] up to beam energies ∼ 600 MeV,
well beyond the pion production threshold, Ethr ≈ 350 MeV.
Figure 2.4 Neutron-proton scattering phase shitfs in the 1 S0 channel as a function of beam energy
in the lab frame. The solid and dashed lines correspond to results obtained using the AV18 and
AV6P potentials, respectively. Squares and circles represent data from the analyses of the NIjmegen
Group [15, 16] and Workman et al. [17].
Projection of the AV18 potential onto a basis of eight operators, allowing to include the
effects of spin-orbit interactions in both the singlet and triplet isospin channels, provides
an improved description of the P -states phase shifts. The resulting interaction is dubbed
Argonne v80 (AV8P) potential [14].
It has to be emphasised that the ability to explain the data at large energy is critical
to the application of a potential model to describe the properties of nuclear matter in
14 Nuclear Matter Theory
the high-density region, relevant to neutron star physics. To see this, consider a scattering
process involving two nucleons embedded in the nuclear medium at density %. In the nearly
degenerate regime typical of neutron stars, the collisions only involve particles with energies
close to the Fermi energy, eF ∝ %2/3 . As a consequence, a simple relation can be established
between the energy of the projectile particle in the laboratory frame and the matter density.
In the case of head-on scattering in pure neutron matter one finds
1
Elab = (3π 2 %)2/3 , (2.14)
m
implying that the maximum energy of Fig. 2.4 corresponds to % ≈ 4%0 , where %0 = 0.16 fm−3
is the central density of atomic nuclei, see Fig. 1.2.
The prominent features of the NN potential in the 1 S0 state are shown in Fig. 2.5. The
short-range repulsive core, to be ascribed to heavy-meson exchange or to more complicated
mechanisms involving nucleon constituents, is followed by an intermediate range attractive
region, largely due to correlated two-pion exchange processes. Finally, at long range the
one-pion-exchange mechanism dominates.
Figure 2.5 Radial dependence of the central component, v 1 component of the AV6P potential, see
Eq.(2.12).
Commonly used phenomenological models of the NNN force, such as the Urbana IX
(UIX) potential [20], are written in the form
2π R
Vijk = Vijk + Vijk , (2.15)
2π
where Vijk is the attractive Fujita-Miyazawa term, a schematic representation of which is
N
given in Fig. 2.6, while Vijk is a purely phenomenological repulsive term.
The explicit expressions of the two contributions appearing in the right-hand side of
Eq.(2.15) are
X 1
2π
Vijk = A2π {Xij , Xjk }{τ i · τ j , τ j · τ k } + [Xij , Xjk ][τ i · τ j , τ j · τ k ] , (2.16)
4
cycl
and
X
R
Vijk =U T 2 (mπ rij )T 2 (mπ rjk ) , (2.17)
cycl
where the sums are extended to all cyclic permutations of the indices i, j and k. In the
above equations
with
e−x
Y (x) = ξ(r) , (2.19)
x
3 3
T (x) = (1 + + 2 )Y (x) , (2.20)
x x
where the function ξ cuts off the contribution of OPE interactions at short distances, and
Sij is given by Eq.(2.11). The strength A2π and U are determined in such a way as to
reproduce the binding energies of 3 He and 4 He and the empirical equilibrium density of
isospin-symmetric nuclear matter, hereafter referred to as SNM, respectively.
The nuclear Hamiltonians constructed supplementing the AV18 NN potential with a
phenomenological NNN potentials, such as the UIX model or the more advanced model
referred to as Illinois-7 (IL7) [21], while being mainly constrained to reproduce the properties
of the two- and three-nucleon systems, exhibit a remarkable predictive power. The results
of Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) calculations carried out using the AV18-IL7 Hamiltonian,
extensively reviewed by Carlson et al. [22], account for the measured energies of the ground
and low-lying excited states of nuclei with A ≤ 12 with accuracy of few percent, see Fig. 2.7.
Calculations based on phenomenological Hamiltonians also account for of variety elec-
troweak nuclear observables of light nuclei, including electromagnetic form factors. and
low-energy transition rates [23].
15
-20
1+
2+ 2+ 7/2− 4+
0+ 5/2− 2+ 0+
-30 0+ 3+ 2+
0+ 1+
4He 6 1+ 5/2− 2+
4+
He 6Li
7/2− 8
He 1+
3+
7/2+
5/2+ 4+
-40 1/2− 0+ 5/2− 2+
3/2− 1+ 1/2− 7/2−
3+ 3+
2+ 3/2− 7/2−
7Li 1+ 2+
4+ 3/2− 3+
-50 2+ 9Li +
1+ 3+
Energy (MeV)
2+ 3/2+ 4+
8Li 5/2+ 3,2+ 1+ 2+
0+
0+ 1
-60 Argonne v18 8Be
1/2−
5/2− 2+
3+
2+
1/2+ 2+ 1+
with Illinois-7 3/2− 0+ 1+
-70 3+
GFMC Calculations 9Be 10Be
10B
-80
0+
AV18 2+
-90 AV18 Expt. 0+
+IL7
-100
12C
FIG. 2 GFMC energies of light nuclear ground and excited states for the AV18 and AV18+IL7 Hamiltonians compared to
Figure 2.7 Comparison between the spectra of light nuclei obtained by Carlson et al. using the
experiment.
Green’s Function Monte Carlo (GFMC) technique and experimenta data. The calculations have
been carried out using a nuclear Hamiltonian comprising the AV18 NN potential, with and without
inclusion of the IL7
TABLE I AV18+IL7 model
GFMC resultsof A 12interactions.Taken
forNNN from [22].
nuclear ground states, compared to experimental values (Amroun et al., 1994;
NNDC, 2014; Nörtershäuser and et al., 2009; Nörtershäuser et al., 2011; Purcell et al., 2010; Shiner et al., 1994; Tilley et al.,
2002, 2004). Numbers in parentheses are statistical errors for the GFMC calculations or experimental errors; errors of less than
one in the last decimal place are not shown.
A
Z(JThree-nucleon
⇡
;T) interactions play rpa [rcritical
E (MeV) n ] (fm)
role in nuclear
µ (µmatter.
N)
Their inclusion
Q (fm2 ) is es-
sential
2
to explain
GFMC the Expt.
equilibrium properties
GFMC of SNM,
Expt. and
GFMC strongly
Expt. affects
GFMC the equation
Expt. of
H(1+ ; 0) 2.225 2.2246 1.98 1.96 0.8604 0.8574 0.270 0.286
state—that
3 1+ 1
H( 2 ; 2 )
is, the
8.47(1)
density
8.482
dependence
1.59
of
[1.73]
the ground-state
1.58
expectation
2.960(1) 2.979
value of the nuclear
Hamiltonian—at 7.718% > %
densities 0.
3 +
He( 12 ; 12 ) 7.72(1) 1.76 [1.60] 1.76 2.100(1) 2.127
4
He(0+ ; 0) 28.42(3) 28.30 1.43 1.462(6)
6
He(0+ ; 1) 29.23(2) 29.27 1.95(3) [2.88] 1.93(1)
6
Li(1+ ; 0) 31.93(3) 31.99 2.39 2.45(4) 0.835(1) 0.822 0.1(2) 0.082(2)
7
He( 32 ; 32 ) 28.74(3) 28.86 1.97 [3.32(1)]
7
Li( 32 ; 12 ) 39.15(3) 39.25 2.25 [2.44] 2.31(5) 3.24(1) 3.256 3.9(2) 4.06(8)
7
Be( 32 ; 12 ) 37.54(3) 37.60 2.51 [2.32] 2.51(2) 1.42(1) 1.398(15) 6.6(2)
8
He(0+ ; 2) 31.42(3) 31.40 1.83(2) [2.73] 1.88(2)
8
Li(2+ ; 1) 41.14(6) 41.28 2.11 [2.47] 2.20(5) 1.48(2) 1.654 2.5(2) 3.27(6)
NUCLEAR DYNAMICS 17
which are usually adjusted to reproduce the binding energies of the three- and four-nucleon
systems.
Being based on a momentum expansion, early χEFT potentials were naturally derived
in momentum space [29, 30]. However, a procedure has been also developed to obtain
coordinate space representations, needed for use in QMC calculations [31, 32]. The numerical
results of a study carried out using the Auxiliary Field Diffusion Monte Carlo (AFDMC)
technique demonstrate that local coordinate space N2 LO potentials, describing both two-
and three-nucleon interactions, provide a remarkably good account of the ground-state
energies and charge radii of nuclei with A ≤ 16 [33].
Because the difference between the mass of the ∆ resonance and the nucleon mass,
∆m . 300 MeV, is small compared to the scale Λχ, χEFT can be naturally extended to
include explicit ∆ degrees of freedom. Fully local, coordinate-space two- and three-nucleon
chiral potentials with ∆ intermediate states, obtained at N3 LO and N2 LO, respectively,
have been shown to explain the energy spectra of nuclei with mass range A ≤ 12 with a few
percent accuracy [34].
Theoretical studies based on χEFT have been also extended to nuclear matter. The
present development of the QMC approach only allows to treat pure neutron matter, here-
after referred to as PNM, whereas combined analyses of PNM and SNM have been carried
out within the framework of more approximated methods. A prominent feature of the chiral
three-nucleon interactions, tuned to reproduce the properties of few-nucleon systems, is the
capability to predict saturation of SNM at % ≈ %0 [35]. However, the results of AFDMC
calculations indicate that in PNM the ambiguities associated with the choice of contact
operators are much larger than in light nuclei [36].
It has to be kept in mind that χEFT is based on a low momentum expansion. Therefore,
it is inherently limited when it comes to describing nuclear interactions in high-density nu-
clear matter. This problem clearly emerges from the phase-shift analysis of Piarulli et al. [38],
showing that, even with the inclusion of significant corrections up to N3 LO, chiral potentials
provide an accurate fit to the data only at Elab . 200 MeV. The failure of the potentials
of Gezerlis et al. [31] to reproduce the 1 S0 phase shifts at larger energies is illustrated in
Fig. 2.8. Based on the argument discussed in Sect. 2.3.1, Fig. 2.8 suggests that the χEFT
potential is unable to accurately describe NN interactions in nuclear matter at % & 1.5%0 .
In the density regime relevant to neutron stars, purely phenomenological interactions, such
as the AV18 potential, appear to provide a better option [37].
Another Random Scribd Document
with Unrelated Content
which was broken in his skull by the force of the blow that felled
him.
It is an unlucky business: the Company certainly do not require at
present more territory on that side India, and the expense to which
Government is put by this elegant little mill, as Pierce Egan might
call it, is more than the worthies in Leadenhall-street suppose.
I see Lord Hastings is made Civil Governor of Malta! “To what base
uses we may return!” I observe the motion to prevent the necessity
of parents sending their sons to Haileybury has been lost. The grand
object of the students should be the acquisition of the oriental
languages; here nothing else tells.
If a young man gets out of college in three or four months after
his arrival, which, if he crams at college in England, he may easily
effect, he is considered forthwith as a brilliant character, and is
sealed with the seal of genius. Likewise pockets medals and money,
and this he may do without knowing any thing else.
To a person fresh from England, the number of servants attending
at table is remarkable. We had only a small party of eight to dinner
yesterday, including ourselves; three-and-twenty servants were in
attendance! Each gentleman takes his own servant or servants, in
number from one to six, and each lady her attendant or attendants,
as it pleases her fancy. The Hooqŭ was very commonly smoked at
that time in Calcutta: before dinner was finished, every man’s pipe
was behind his chair. The tobacco was generally so well prepared,
that the odour was not unpleasant, unless by chance you sat next to
a man from the Mofussil, when the fume of the spices used by the
up country Hooqŭ Bardārs in preparing the tobacco, rendered it
oppressive and disagreeable.
Sept. 1st.—The fever has quitted Calcutta, and travelled up the
country stage by stage. It was amusing to see, upon your return to
the Course, the whole of the company stamped, like yourself, with
the marks of the leech upon the temples. Its origin has been
attributed to many causes, and it has been called by many names.
The gentlemen of the lancet are greatly divided in their opinions;
some attribute it to the want of rain, others to the scarcity of
thunder and lightning this season. There was an instance of the
same general fever prevailing in the time of Warren Hastings. Not a
single instance has been heard of its having proved mortal to adults.
فاني پارکس
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
textbookfull.com