Applying Genomic and Proteomic Microarray Technology in Drug Discovery 2nd Ed Edition Matson
Applying Genomic and Proteomic Microarray Technology in Drug Discovery 2nd Ed Edition Matson
com
https://ebookultra.com/download/applying-genomic-
and-proteomic-microarray-technology-in-drug-
discovery-2nd-ed-edition-matson/
https://ebookultra.com/download/applying-genomic-and-proteomic-
microarray-technology-in-drug-discovery-1st-edition-robert-s-matson/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/microarray-methods-for-drug-
discovery-1st-edition-tony-s-mondala/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/drug-discovery-and-development-
technology-in-transition-2nd-edition-raymond-g-hill/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/bioinformatics-and-drug-discovery-2nd-
edition-kubilay-demir/
ebookultra.com
Phage Display In Biotechnology and Drug Discovery Drug
Discovery Series 1st Edition Sachdev S. Sidhu
https://ebookultra.com/download/phage-display-in-biotechnology-and-
drug-discovery-drug-discovery-series-1st-edition-sachdev-s-sidhu/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/pharmacogenomics-in-drug-discovery-
and-development-2nd-edition-qing-yan-eds/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/microarray-technology-in-practice-1st-
edition-steve-russell/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/textbook-of-drug-design-and-
discovery-4th-ed-edition-povl-krogsgaard-larsen/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/optimization-in-drug-discovery-1st-
edition-yan-z/
ebookultra.com
Applying genomic and proteomic microarray technology
in drug discovery 2nd ed Edition Matson Digital Instant
Download
Author(s): Matson, Robert S
ISBN(s): 9781439855645, 1439855641
Edition: 2nd ed
File Details: PDF, 20.47 MB
Year: 2013
Language: english
Second Edition
Applying
Genomic and Proteomic
Microarray Technology
in Drug Discovery
Robert S. Matson
Second Edition
Applying
Genomic and Proteomic
Microarray Technology
in Drug Discovery
Second Edition
Applying
Genomic and Proteomic
Microarray Technology
in Drug Discovery
Robert S. Matson
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts
have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume
responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers
have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to
copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has
not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmit-
ted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented,
including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system,
without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.
com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood
Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and
registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC,
a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used
only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
vii
© 2010 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
viii Contents
Flow-Thru Biochips............................................................................. 49
Electronic Biochips............................................................................. 51
References........................................................................................... 54
xiii
© 2010 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
The Author
Robert S. Matson is president and co-founder of QuantiScientifics, LLC. The
company is involved in the commercialization of multiplexed assays for life sci-
ence, clinical research, and in vitro diagnostics. Previously, Matson was involved
in the research and development of microarray technologies, detection chem-
istries, as well as point-of-care devices for more than seventeen years while at
Beckman Coulter, Inc. He participated in the National Institute of Standards and
Technology’s (NIST) Advanced Technology Program sponsored Genosensor
Consortium and collaborated with Sir Edwin Southern on the development of an
in situ oligonucleotide array synthesis platform for the corporation. Other work
included development of the A2 MicroArray System, a microplate-based array
platform for multiplexed micro-ELISA, which QuantiScientifics recently licensed
for commercialization.
Matson has been granted twelve U.S. patents and six European patents on nucleic
acid and protein microarray technology. He was inducted into Beckman Coulter’s
Inventors Hall of Fame in 2006 and was elected a Fellow of the National Academy
of Clinical Biochemistry in 2008. He previously served in several technical man-
agement roles including Research and Development (R&D) Director, BioProbe
International; R&D Director, Costar-Nuclepore; and Chemistry R&D Group Leader
at BioRad Laboratories. Matson earned his PhD in biochemistry from Wayne State
University. Following postdoctoral studies at the UCLA Medical School, he served
as a principal investigator with the Veterans Administration Medical Center and
as adjunct professor of biological chemistry at the University of California-Davis
Medical School. He has also held a faculty lectureship at USC’s Department of
Chemistry and was assistant professor of chemistry at the University of Southern
Maine, Portland. He is the author of Applying Genomic and Proteomic Microarray
Technology in Drug Discovery (CRC Press, 2005) and Microarray Methods and
Protocols (CRC Press, 2009).
xv
© 2010 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
1 Omics and Microarrays
Revisited
These biomarker patterns will provide more individualized information, which
will then provide support to clinicians and selection of optimal therapies.
Thomas O. Joos*
INTRODUCTION
In the previous edition of this book (2005) we spoke of an “omics-driven” paradigm
shift toward quantitative biology in which the microarray played a key role. Indeed,
we have witnessed the continued advancement of DNA-array-based platforms as
powerful gene expression analysis tools for biomarker discovery. Protein arrays con-
tinue to play a role in biomarker discovery and validation but are also in demand for
both clinical research and clinical diagnostic applications (Yu et al., 2010). Clearly,
much debate remains over the clinical role for biomarkers, as well as the validation
and regulation of derived multianalyte tests and multivariate index assays (Amur
et al., 2008; Tahara et al., 2009; Boja et al., 2011; Smith, 2011; Dimond, 2012;
Wellhausen & Seitz, 2012).
Nevertheless, microarrays are now transitioning for use in companion diagnos-
tics. For example, Merck and Roche began collaboration in 2011 to develop the
Affymetrix’s AmpliChip p53 for companion diagnostics. Roche Diagnostics will
validate and standardize tests for Merck’s use in qualifying patients in clinical oncol-
ogy trials. Clinical proteomics has emerged as a discipline; the first protein-based
multivariate index assay, the OVA1 test for ovarian cancer, received U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2009.
We have also witnessed the emergence of other omics-driven research employ-
ing microarray technologies. The glycomics field (see Consortium for Functional
Glycomics [CFG] at www.functionalglycomics.org) has adapted microarrays for
the screening of glycan-protein interactions. For example, Smith and co-workers
at Emory University (Atlanta, Georgia) have developed “shotgun glycomics” as a
means to identify and characterize the functionality of glycans (Song et al., 2011).
Oligosaccharide (glycan) arrays have been used in identifying immunogenic car-
bohydrate moieties on the pathogen, Bacillus anthracis exosporium (Wong et
al., 2007). The Stanford University group has been active in the development of
photochemical micropatterning of carbohydrates (Carroll et al., 2006) and in the
photogeneration of epitope-specific glycan arrays using phthalimide terminated
* Protein Microarrays for Personalized Medicine, Clin Chem 56(3), 376–387, 2010.
1
© 2010 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
2 Genomic and Proteonomic Microarray Technology in Drug Discovery
SBH Chips
t
taa
gt ttct
ggtta
Target
AAGAGCGGCTCCACCACT
Elements or features
Probe (spots, 75–150 micron dia.)
Center-to-center spacing
Substrate (150–300 microns)
spotted arrays; or the side of a square for in situ arrays) are often referred to as
features or elements of the array. Thus, an array containing 10,000 features would
have 10,000 probes arranged as an array on the substrate. Typical spotted arrays
would have 100 to 150 micron (µm) diameter features, while the photo-lithograph-
ically prepared in situ arrays may have features on the order of 2 to 20 µm. The
separation between elements is usually measured in terms of a center-to-center
distance, spacing, or pitch. That is, for a printed array, two adjacent spots in the
array (e.g., each at 100 micron spot diameter) may have a center-to-center distance
of 150 microns. Or, the spots would be separated by 50 microns from their edge.
The number of spots per square centimeter usually defines the spot density. As
an example, Affymetix manufacturing arrays at >280,000 elements per 1.28 cm ×
1.28 cm chip would have a spot density on a chip of 170,000 elements/cm2. We can
also classify arrays in terms of high, medium, and low probe density. There may be
some argument regarding the precise boundary limits distinguishing microarrays
on a density scale. Nevertheless, a high density array would contain >10,000 probes/
cm2; medium density, 1000 to 10,000 probes/cm2; and low density, <1000 probes/
cm2. There are also definitions for arrays based upon whether or not they are macro-
and microarrays. A macroarray could be regarded as having larger and fewer spots
than a microarray. For example, the Southern blot on a standard sized membrane (~
8 cm × 12 cm; nylon or nitrocellulose) with spot diameters of 500 microns would be
considered a macroarray by most researchers. However, macroarrays can have thou-
sands of printed spots per membrane and thus functionally perform at a level similar
to that of the slide microarray.
The number of probe molecules per square millimeter defines the spot’s probe
density. Probes within an element or spot could have densities on the order of 109
to ~1012 molecules/mm2 depending upon the molecular size of the nucleic acid (e.g.,
short oligonucleotide versus cDNA).
General Utility
As we will soon discover, microarray-based technologies have found utility in a
number of fields. While DNA arrays are the most technically mature and have the
broadest application portfolio, we have witnessed the ever-increasing generation of
new kinds of probe arrays: antibody, antigen, enzyme, aptamer, carbohydrate, tissue,
cell, and small molecule microarrays. The list undoubtedly will continue to expand.
We can also describe microarrays in terms of prognostic, diagnostic, and predictive
roles. A few examples that examine these applications are provided.
Hospital/POC
Patient Care Clinics/M.D. offices
Testing Blood Banks
Biochip Migration Patient Self-Tests
within
Biomedical Testing
Continuum
Discovery Testing
Specialized University Res. Labs
Testing NIH other Gov. labs
BioPharma/Biotech
Core Facilities
Commercial Labs
BioPharma
Diagnostic Labs
be adopted from these into the mainstream of diagnostics. Array technology finds
its roots in academic circles as a means to sequence genomes. The reverse blot was
originally constructed at a diagnostic research center as a new nucleic acid assay
format for the simultaneous detection of infectious agents.
In the first edition (2005) we observed limited success at moving array technol-
ogy directly into point of care (POC) or centralized laboratory testing. However, that
has changed (see Chapter 7, “Multiplex Assays”), and you will now find microarray
technology being adapted for POC in the form of biochips and lateral flow strips.
Bead-based multiplex assays (or “fluidic” arrays) are in use for clinical research and
are anticipated to migrate into in vitro diagnostics (IVD) and animal health diagnos-
tics in the near future.
NGS
Genomics II
c
s Spe
micro-RNA
Mas
Cell array
aCGH
SNP II Bioinformatics
Proteomics
Antibody/Antigen array
Tissue Array
Genomics I
G i expression
Gene
SNPs
Mutation
CF, HLA SBH
Transcriptomics
Metabolomics
Glycomics
sequencing (NGS) has the potential to displace microarrays in certain fields. For a
review of NGS technologies see Metzker (2010).
Protein microarrays, both planar and bead-based formats, have been widely
adopted for biomarker discovery, biomarker validation, life science research, and
clinical research. Multiplex immunoassays are being evaluated for use in animal
health and human disease diagnostics. However, most proteomic studies continue to
use two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis and mass spectroscopy tools, especially
matrix-assisted laser desorption-mass spectometry (MALD-MS). Improvement in
mass spectroscopy for peptide and protein analysis (Whiteaker, 2010) may challenge
microarrays for clinical use.
A second genomics wave (Genomics II) has emerged with growth in array-based
genomic hybridization (aCGH) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analy-
sis for genetic diagnosis. Micro-RNA (miRNA) gene expression profiling, espe-
cially in cancer research, is also underway using microarrays (see Chapter 5, “Gene
Expression: Microarray-Based Applications”).
Finally, microarray complexity has increased dramatically over the past decade
requiring advanced statistical treatments, ever increasing our thirst for bioinformat-
ics. Information technology (IT) plays a key role in microarray-based platform vali-
dation (Figure 1.7).
8
IT
0
1998 2000 2003 2006
Year
(SBH) of the human genome. Except for a few private ventures such as the work
at HySeq, the SBH approach was quickly supplanted by dideoxynucleotide dye-
terminated gel-based sequencing. The other early use of DNA arrays was in mutation
screening such as for cystic fibrosis (CF) mutations or in human leukocyte antigen
(HLA) typing. The problem with screening for mutations associated with genetic
disease remains a lack of therapy or cure. Without the availability of treatment there
is very little incentive to produce a diagnostic test. The other issue with mutation
detection is that the prognosis is often a statistical inference. For example, possess-
ing the BRCA1 gene mutation only increases the probability risk or likelihood that
a woman may develop familial breast cancer. The presence of the mutation alone
cannot unequivocally determine whether or not someone will develop breast cancer.
Other factors must be considered, especially in this case the family history regard-
ing the occurrence of breast cancer. Thus, mutation detection based upon microarray
technology has not grown as rapidly as once anticipated.
The breakout opportunity for widespread adoption of array technology came
largely from gene expression studies in which the expression levels from two cell
states (e.g., control versus drug-induced; normal versus diseased) were compared.
So while sequencing efforts defined structural genomics, the gene expression
microarray became the tool for functional genomics. In particular, gene expression
microarrays were found to be well suited as a new kind of differential display tech-
nology applied to the drug discovery process. Here, pharmacogenomics examines
the responsiveness of genes (cellular mRNA levels) to drug candidates. The micro-
array measuring the mRNA levels within the cell’s genome permits identification
of potential targets (albeit, mRNA serving as the surrogate of translated protein)
Barcode
cDNA Library
Sample
Select Genes
Remove cells
extract nucleic acids
Drug Screen Set
Label RNA/DNA Formulate drugs at specific conc. Compound Library
Hybridize
Make cDNA
microarray Analysis Data Base
Bioinformatics
Gene Expression
hRNA Transcription
Gene
Splice variants
mRNA
Ribosomes Apo-protein
Protein Expression
Nascent
protein product Post-translational Further
modification processing
Translation
Localization +
Holo-protein
Genome-based arrays
Proteome-based arrays
Obviously for other reasons, such as RNA splice variants and the post-trans-
lational modification of proteins, one cannot rely on mRNA profiling alone.
However, development of a complete “proteome chip” that would provide global
inspection of relative protein abundance has been hindered. There is simply little
means of obtaining a highly significant representation of a proteome (i.e., con-
tent) on any chip. Antibody arrays have been introduced but are of limited util-
ity at this point for proteome-wide applications. Because microarrays are closed
architecture technology platforms, they can only provide information based upon
what is contained on the chip. So, we must first acquire enough protein content
(antibody libraries or mimetic agents such as aptamers) necessary for proteome
discovery work.
Some argue that it is a waste of time monitoring gene expression when ultimately
we desire the end product, the protein target. More likely both are needed to further
grasp at our understanding of cellular events (Clarke et al., 2001). We now have our
list of genes in hand and a few good tools. Not surprisingly we have found biology
to be even more complex than once thought. As John Weinstein suggests, “perhaps
the most important (and least recognized) aspect of biology that makes it difficult to
understand systematically is the fact that biological complexity was not produced by
a watch maker or an engineer” (2002, p. 362).
So, while we can consider the strengths and weaknesses of various technologies
and pursue “omic” approaches, we must also not lose sight that these are tools to aid
in our study. Miller (2002) makes this point:
These novel and significant tools, which are rapidly becoming indispensable, do not
by themselves enlarge the bedrock of basic knowledge that underlies new discoveries.
That foundation remains the detailed understanding of the biological basis of health
and disease.
Drug Discovery
Target II
Clinical
Validation
Leads Preclinical
I III
FDA
IV
R.O.I.
FINISH
In the target discovery process we have witnessed an increased role for genomics.
In fact, as much as 25% of new target identification efforts may now be based upon
genomic approaches. Differential gene expression pattern analysis (control versus
drug response phenotype; normal versus diseased state) developed using the micro-
array chip technology continues to play an important role. High-density microarrays
such as Affymetix’s GeneChip have been found to be very useful in target identi-
fication. Microarrays based upon normalized cDNA libraries have also been suc-
cessfully used in the discovery of novel genes that are potential candidates for drug
targeting (Katsuma, 2001). cDNA arrays have now given way to high-density oligo-
nucleotide chips that represent whole genomes.
The human genome is “roughly” complete as are the sequences of useful
model genomes (e.g., mouse, rat, yeast) nearly complete with other genomes being
sequenced at a rapid pace. The actual number of fully completed genomes is rather
elusive, but counting microbes there are most likely several hundred completed or
nearly completed sequences. Gene expression arrays should continue to serve with
increased capacity provided they are not displaced by next-generation sequencing
technologies. Gene expression profiling of metabolic pathway enzymes can also play
a pivotal role in guiding efforts toward identifying new targets.
While we may be remised in that differential gene expression is but a surrogate
methodology, we do not yet have an equivalent proteomic tool. Albeit, the NAPPA
(nucleic acid programmable protein array) approach (Ramachandran et al., 2008)
could potentially be used for this purpose (Anderson et al., 2011).
Ringer et al. (2000) found pharmacogenomics was rapidly becoming an accepted
route in the later stages of the drug discovery process involving both the preclinical
and clinical phases. A key factor in the acceptance of the pharmacogenomic (and
pharmacogenetic) approach has been that both drug efficacy and toxicity are well-
correlated to changes in gene expression. Microarrays offer both high throughput
and sensitivity. These attributes are particularly advantageous in reducing the time
and cost in determining drug toxicity during the preclinical stage. During late stage
clinical trials the profiling of an individual’s genetic variation (SNP) correlated to
drug response has been an important screening process. Several microarray-based
SNP “calling” platform technologies (e.g., Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP
Array; Illumina’s Golden Gate SNP Assay) can be used in defining specific poly-
morphisms associated with variable drug responses within individuals and various
populations.
Without a doubt one of the most historic testimonies to the power of the microar-
ray has been in the characterization of cancer cell lines and tumor gene expression.
The National Cancer Institute’s study of cDNA microarray gene expression patterns
across 60 human cancer cell lines (with an activity pattern database on each cell line
individually challenged by over 70,000 compounds) remains the “tour de force” in
microarray-based profiling (Ross et al., 2000). Even more impressive has been the
assembly of the integrated gene expression-molecular pharmacology database for the
NCI60 cell lines (Scherf et al., 2000). And while the NCI60 study had some recog-
nized limitations (limited activity assay data; limited number of arrayed genes; sur-
rogate relationship of cell line to tumor cells), there are those encouraging examples
where the gene expression approach has unraveled mechanisms of drug resistance.
Rew (2001) considered five areas in cancer research applicable for the use of
microarray technologies:
In the review by Zanders (2000), a good case is made for the use of gene expres-
sion microarrays to monitor changes in signaling pathway activity. The rationale is
that under environmental stress such as in tumor growth or during an inflammatory
response, signaling pathways are activated or repressed, and these events can be
measured by gene activity by mRNA profiling. That is, “transcription of mRNAs
could be exploited as a ‘surrogate marker’ of signaling pathway activation” (Zanders,
2000, p. 378). Cited examples include studies concerning the expression profiling of
signaling pathway enzymes in yeast such as the mitogen-activated protein kinases
(MAPKs) during times of growth or differentiation or when under stress (Roberts
et al., 2000). Homologous mammalian MAPKs have been reported and are being
investigated as potential drug targets. In the study by Iyer (1999), the use of gene
expression microarrays revealed the induction of genes involved in wound healing
during serum-stimulated human fibroblast growth.
Toxicogenomic Applications
Almost without exception, gene expression is altered during toxicity, as either a direct
or indirect result of toxicant exposure (Nuwaysir et al., 1999).
This early cause-and-effect revelation most certainly promoted the early use of
the gene expression microarray technology at the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
resulting in the creation of the ToxChip cDNA microarray. A toxicant signature
is derived from gene expression relative fold changes between control and treated
cell populations. The ToxChip contained approximately 2000 human gene cDNAs
arranged in various functional categories such as apoptosis, cell-cycle, cytochrome
P-450s, and so on, to detect response to toxic insult. Hodges et al. (2003) were able
to elucidate the mechanism of action for tamoxifen, a drug used in the treatment of
breast cancer, using the ToxChip. Lobenhofer et al. (2002) used the ToxChip v1.0 to
study the mechanism of estrogen-induced proliferation (mitogenesis) using a hor-
mone-responsive human breast cancer cell line.
Even though toxicogenomic profiling is very useful in providing an adjunct
to animal studies, there are certain precautions in interpreting microarray data
because “the transcriptome profile is extremely sensitive to any subtle changes
surrounding cells, tissues, or individual organisms” (Shoida, 2004, p. 22). There
are several such factors that may influence the outcome of a microarray experi-
ment and bias the toxicant signature. For example, circadian rhythms are often
overlooked. A simple change out of culture media can have a dramatic effect on
cells in culture.
In conclusion, gene expression array technologies have been largely accepted in
the scientific community. They are well suited as tools for drug discovery and the
elucidation of drug-target mechanism(s) of action (Cunningham, 2000; Clarke et al.,
2001). In particular, microarrays provide insight into
Proteomics Today
The Great Challenge
“Defining the entire set of proteins of an organism”
Separate
Proteome Enrich
Genome
Classify
Sequence
Structure-Function
Affinity Capture
Protein Abundance Class separation
33K < x < 106 proteins
Fractionation
“microarray”
Enrichment
Analysis
Mass Spec
M
ELISA
Phage Display
spec differential display pattern profiling of serum proteins and peptides associated
with various cancers. Protein profiling offers an exciting opportunity as a noninva-
sive (or nearly so with a prick of blood) diagnostic tool similar in scope to that of the
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan for body tissues.
Huels and co-workers (2003) have identified several areas within the drug devel-
opment process where protein biochips have potential application. The antibody-
based microarray ELISA format is now commonplace. Antigen arrays have been
used to bait the capture and characterization of additional antibodies needed to fill
in the proteome libraries. Several well-characterized antibodies are usually required
in order to cover more than one epitope on each antigen. This is especially important
if the sandwich assay is to be optimally employed. Antibody and antigen microar-
ray formats are briefly described in more detail in Chapter 6, “Protein Microarray
Applications,” as well as in Chapter 7, “Multiplex Assays.”
Future generation protein arrays will include in addition to antibody-antigen
binding, other protein-protein or receptor-ligand interactions (Figure 1.14). These
include protein-peptide, substrate-enzyme, aptamer, and protein–small molecule
high-throughput assays. Proofs of principle on a variety of these formats have been
the subject of numerous reviews. Essentially, protein microarrays are believed to
be able to broadly cover the various phases of the drug discovery process simi-
larly to what we have described for gene-expression microarrays (Figure 1.15).
However, as with the DNA microarray, there remain a few hurdles ahead of us
(Figure 1.16).
Living Cell
Array
Target II
Discovery
I III
Toxicity
Protein Target testing
Array Validation
Gene Expression
Array
FIGURE 1.15 The role for microarrays in the drug discovery process.
Critical Issues
DNA Microarrays Protein Microarrays
Cross-platform standardization MIAME No PCR equivalent technology RCA
Non-specific adsorption
Improved printing technology 1
Cross-reactivity 2
Guidelines on statistical methods of analysis
Detection sensitivity & dynamic range RLS
Continued access to “content” Where to obtain “content” and at what cost
MIAME = Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment
October 14, 2002 Adoption of MIAME for array standardization
Major scientific journals (including Cell, The Lancet, Nature and Science)
endorse MIAME guidelines for publishing microarray gene expression data.
class, e.g., antibodies) can vary considerably in their physical-chemical stability and
binding character on surfaces. Another challenge remains in the selection of the
optimal substrate(s), immobilization and presentation (orientation) of the ligand, as
well as the development of sensitive assays for different protein classes.
Content
Antibody coverage of the human proteome is estimated to be about 5 to 10% of
all human proteins and isoforms (Valle and Jendoubi, 2003). A major bottleneck
in the use of protein expression arrays has been the lack of such a comprehensive
set of these capture agents (Hanash, 2003). Since the equivalent of the polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) process for mass amplification of low abundant proteins does
not exist, the remaining library of proteome capture ligands may need to be gener-
ated by other means such as recombinant protein expression systems (Cahill, 2001).
However, recombinant antibodies may be less stable and have lower binding affini-
ties than monoclonal antibodies (Valle and Jendoubi, 2003). Therefore, in order to
fully implement the microarray format a host of diverse capture agents could be
required in addition to antibodies. These include peptides, small molecules, aptam-
ers, ribozymes, or other molecular recognition probes yet to be discovered. However,
it is also understandable because of the diverse nature of proteins that technologies
besides microarrays will be used in proteomics research (Hanash, 2003).
Detection
As difficult as it is going to be to isolate and produce thousands of high affinity and
specificity protein ligands, it may be even harder to come up with a good way to moni-
tor binding of proteins to the chip (Kodadek, 2001).
In the review by Kodadek (2001) the following points are made regarding near-
term approaches for detection on protein microarrays:
Micro-ELISA Formats
Assays involving antibody or antigen arrays tend to be micro-ELISA formats. For
instance, anti-cytokine monoclonal-monoclonal or monoclonal-polyclonal anti-
body pairs are readily available and well characterized for use in ELISA assays.
Cytokines are important biological indicators used in drug discovery and toxicity
testing. Therefore, it is no surprise that many of the early antibody microarray dem-
onstrations involved the determination of cytokines from cell culture. They simply
miniaturized and multiplexed the familiar sandwich immunoassay. The microarray-
based cytokine assays generally claim sensitivities in the low pg/mL range with lin-
ear dynamic ranges from about 10 to 10,000 pg/mL depending upon the analyte.
These are similar in performance to the standard ELISA.
Woodbury et al. (2002) developed a micro-ELISA assay for determination of
hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) in human serum. In this case, a horseradish peroxi-
dase (HRP)-catalyzed TSA-biotin amplification with streptavidin-Cy3 reporter was
employed. They claimed sensitivity to 0.5 pg/mL or 6 fM HGF with a linear dynamic
range of 12 to 4000 pg/mL in serum. This was good enough because clinically rel-
evant levels varied 199 to 1640 pg/mL (breast cancer patients) and 153 to 998 pg/mL
for age-matched normal controls. In addition, HGF and four other antigens found in
serum were simultaneously quantified even though the analytes varied in physiologi-
cal concentration from 20 to 60,000 pg/mL. The HGF microarray-ELISA correlated
(r 2 = 0.90) with a standard 96-well-plate ELISA.
So, for the determination of a limited set of analytes, the antibody microarray
works reasonably well and is comparable in performance if not better than that
of a standard ELISA for individual analytes. Furthermore, we will discover that
a suitable number of detection technologies are available for use on a variety of
supports. The real problem may be in at what point antibody microarrays “hit the
wall” for multiplexing. What is not generally appreciated is that each antibody
pair needs to be matched up and cross-reactivity for all pairs determined. That
involves not only the cross-reactivity of each capture antibody but also the cross-
reactivity of all secondary antibodies, including the extent of secondary to second-
ary interactions. It is not uncommon to sort through several antibody pairs before
finding compatible sets. Consider now having to do the same for an antibody array
including hundreds to thousands of analyte-specific pairs. See Chapter 6 (“Protein
Microarray Applications”) for additional examples and discussion concerning the
issue of cross-reactivity.
1. Extract total protein from cancer and normal cells using a detergent (e.g.,
1% NP40).
2. Remove excess detergent from lysate by adsorption onto a solid phase
(e.g., beads).
3. Determine total protein concentration for each lysate.
4. Label equal amounts of protein from cancer and normal cell lysate (e.g.,
Cy5-NHS labeling of cancer lysate; Cy3-NHS labeling of normal lysate).
5. Remove free dye from dye-labeled proteins by gel filtration chromatography.
6. Mix Cy5-protein with Cy3-protein purified lysates.
7. Concentrate mixture.
8. Apply concentrate to antibody array.
9. Wash array free of unbound antigens, and then perform confocal scan.
10. Analyze data.
Here are some potential issues to consider: First, detergent extraction can be
problematic. Not all proteins will extract or if so to the same extent. The amount
of protein present can influence the efficiency and stability of detergent micelle
formation. Inefficient removal of detergent as well as irreversible partitioning of
proteins onto a solid support during purification is likely. If there were differ-
ences in protein abundance between test and control cell lysates before process-
ing, there could be significant differential loss following processing. Individual
proteins can have very different labeling efficiencies depending upon protein con-
centration, pH, ionic strength, and the number and accessibility of dye-reactive
amino acid residues (Kodadek, 2001). As with the labeling of nucleic acids, Cy5
and Cy3 or other dyes may have different labeling efficiencies for the same pro-
tein. Dye-labeled proteins may differentially adsorb onto the solid phase used for
purification. Concentrating may do more harm than good if proteins denature and
aggregate forming protein complexes. If such complexes are applied to the anti-
body array both false positive and false negative associations are likely.
et al., 2004) or are elevated in serum in various disease states. Moreover, there are
numerous cytokines involved in cellular response with many serving as dual effec-
tors (Asao and Fu, 2000). As a result, anti-cytokine microarrays are being evalu-
ated in drug discovery for off-target toxicity testing to replace standard ELISA plate
formats. An extensive listing of cytokines is available at COPE (Cytokines & Cells
Online Pathfinder Encyclopedia) at http://www.copewithcytokines.org. Version 29.0
containing over 29,000 entries was released in spring/summer 2012.
Huang et al. (2002) prepared an antibody array for the simultaneous detection of
43 cytokines. They were able to verify the down-regulation of MCP-1 cytokine in
transfected cells (human glioblastoma cells transfected with cx43 expression vec-
tor) relative to control cells. The antibody array is an emerging technology. At least
in one study based upon the use of a commercial membrane format, the cytokine
microarray failed to accurately determine cytokine levels in bacterial and LPS-
stimulated whole human blood (Copland, 2004).
The typing of various allergens using the antigen microarray has also met with
success due in part to the availability of recombinant allergens (i.e., content). Jahn-
Schmid and co-workers (2003) examined the analytical performance of an allergen
(grass and tree pollens) microarray for the detection of allergen-specific serum IgG
in 51 patient sera. While considerable variation was observed with intra- and inter-
assay for some allergens, the sensitivity and specificity of the microarray were com-
parable to the conventional ELISA. Shreffler et al. (2004) constructed an antigen
array including an overlapping series of peptide probes representing epitopes asso-
ciated with the major peanut allergens. Examining 77 patient sera the group found
considerable variation in patient IgE–epitope profiling suggesting such population
heterogeneity might be of prognostic value.
Finally, Nishizuka et al. (2003) undertook the arduous task of proteomic profil-
ing the NCI-60 cancer cell lines based upon high-density arraying of cell lysates.
In this case, lysates are prepared in a urea denaturing buffer and maintained in
a reduced state with dithiothretol (DTT). This allows opportunity for additional
assessment from 2D-PAGE gels. Serial dilutions of each protein lysate were printed
onto the substrate (FAST slides, nitrocellulose-coated glass, Schleicher & Schuell,
Germany). Monoclonal antibodies screened by Western blotting to lysate were
used for detection and SYPRO ruby protein stain (molecular probes) for determi-
nation of total protein. Fifty-two proteins (i.e., those with high specificity antibody
recognition) were analyzed in lysates. Of these, 31 were matched to cDNA and
GeneChip microarrays; 19 of those 31 showed significant correlation between the
two gene-expression formats used earlier in characterizing the NCI-60 cell lines
(e.g., Ross et al., 2000; Scherf et al., 2000). How do the expressions of these pro-
teins correlate with the corresponding mRNA profiles? And the answer, please...?
Structure-related proteins are almost always better correlated with mRNA levels
across the 60 cell lines.
FUTURE MEDICINE—PHARMACOPROTEOMICS
OR PHARMACOGENOMICS?
The end result for drug development is to successfully supply cost-effective drugs
that provide for better patient treatment, offering cures from new therapies and
improvements in disease management. The latter includes the advancement of diag-
nostics with tests that will more rapidly and more accurately determine disease state
and monitor treatments. But, what road should we travel down in the future—phar-
macogenomics or pharmacoproteomics (Figure 1.17)?
Jain (2004) defines pharmacoproteomics as the use of proteomic technologies
in drug discovery and development. It is Jain’s contention that pharmacoproteomics
rather than genotyping will take the lead role in promoting the practice of personal-
ized medicine. This remains to be seen. Key to that success will be the continued
application of protein chips, enabling future discovery and development of drugs for
personalized therapy, and entry into point-of-care diagnostics.
However, do not rule out pharmacogenomic approaches (Ginsburg et al.,
2001). Sabatini’s reverse-transfection method of creating “live cell” microarrays
Genome Proteome
Targets
Polymorphisms
Post-translational
modifications
Pathways
Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics
Molecular Medicine
offers even greater advantage for drug discovery and development (Ziauddin and
Sabatini, 2001). The method, relying on arrayed cDNA expression vectors to trans-
form adherent cells, provides localized, real-time gene expression analysis of the
putative gene product. The live cell microarray could eventually displace the use
of protein expression microarray for identifying drug targets. This is provided
that more extensive libraries of full length cDNAs (needed to express the com-
plete protein) become available. The approach could potentially be utilized for
high-throughput screens to uncover genotype-phenotype relationships. Offering
an alternative cellular approach, in 2011, the NIH and DARPA announced pro-
grams with the collaboration of the FDA to produce “body-on-a-chip” platforms
of living cell types arrayed on microfluidic devices for detecting the toxicity of
candidate drugs.
What appears to be certain is that microarrays in one omics-based form or another
(DNA, protein, cell, tissue, or small molecule) are playing an increasingly important
role in drug development and diagnostics (Figure 1.18). Perhaps omics will eventu-
ally evolve into an integrated “systems biology” approach (Ideker et al., 2001), one
in which we monitor metabolic pathways, transport, compartmentalization, degrada-
tion, and so forth, and their inter-relationships for small molecules, cell surfaces (e.g.,
carbohydrate microarrays) (Wang et al., 2002), and biopolymers alike (Figure 1.19).
We are just at the beginning of molecular medicine (personalized medicine) and
molecular diagnostics (companion diagnostics). It remains an exciting era for sci-
ence, technology, and personalized medicine.
Phenotyping Pharmacogenomics
Ovarian cancer
Ion channels
Cells/ Diabetes
Tissue Inflammatory
Inter-cellular Toxicity (off-target) Diseases
signaling pathway
Prognostic Cancer new drugs
Receptor-Ligand
Binding Assay Drug Discovery
Systems Biology
Carbohydrate
Patient
lipids
History
Small molecules
Ions
Molecular Diagnostics
REFERENCES
Amur S, Frueh FW, Lesko LJ, Huang S-M. Integration and use of biomarkers in drug develop-
ment, regulation and clinical practice: A U.S. regulatory perspective. Biomarkers Med.
2(3): 305–311, 2008.
Anderson KS, Sibani S, Wallstrom G., et al. A protein microarray signature of autoantibody
biomarkers for the early detection of breast cancer. J. Proteome Res. 10(1): 85–96, 2011.
Asao H, Fu X-Y. Interferon-γ has duel potentials in inhibiting or promoting cell proliferation.
J. Biol. Chem. 275(2): 867–874, 2000.
Boja ES, Jortani SA, Ritchie J, et al. The journey to regulation of protein-based multiplex
quantitative assays. Clin. Chem. 57(4): 560–567, 2011.
Borgan E, Sitter B, Lingjaerde OC, et al. Merging transcriptomics and metabolomics—
Advances in breast cancer profiling. BMC Cancer 10: 628, 2010.
Cahill DJ. Protein and antibody arrays and their medical applications. J. Immunol. Methods
250: 81–91, 2001.
Carroll GT, Wang D, Turro NJ, Koberstein JT. Photochemical micropatterning of carbohy-
drates on a surface. Langmuir 22: 2899–2905, 2006.
Clarke PA, te Poele R, Wooster R, Workman P. Gene expression microarray analysis in can-
cer biology, pharmacology, and drug development: Progress and potential. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 62: 1311–1336, 2001.
Copeland S, Siddiqui J, Remick D. Direct comparison of traditional ELISAs and membrane
protein arrays for detection and quantification of human cytokines. J. Immunol. Methods
284: 99–106, 2004.
Cunningham MJ. Genomics and proteomics—The new millennium of drug discovery and
development. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 44: 291–300, 2000.
de Vegvar HEN, Amara RR, Steinman L, et al. Microarray profiling of antibody responses
against Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Post challenge convergence of reactiv-
ities independent of host histocompatibility type and vaccine regimen. J. Virol. 77(20):
11125–11138, 2003.
Dimond PF. Why biomarker discovery is hard. Gen. Eng. Biotech. News, June 25, 2012.
Ekins R, Chu F, Biggart E. Fluorescence spectroscopy and its application to a new generation
of high sensitivity, multi-microspot, multianalyte, immunoassay. Clin. Chim. Acta 194:
91–114, 1990.
Ekins RP. Ligand assays: From electrophoresis to minaturized microarrays. Clin. Chem. 44(9):
2015–2030, 1998.
Feng Y, Ke X, Ma R, Chen Y, Hu G, Liu F. Parallel detection of autoantibodies with microar-
rays for rheumatoid diseases. Clin. Chem. 50(2): 416–422, 2004.
Ginsburg GS, McCarthy JJ. Personalized medicine: Revolutionizing drug discovery and
patient care. Trends in Biotechnol. 19: 491–496, 2001.
Godula K, Bertozzi CR. Synthesis of glycopolymers for microarray applications via ligation
of reducing sugars to a poly(acryloyl hydrazide) scaffold. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 132:
9963–9965, 2010.
Griffin TJ, Abersold R. Advances in proteomic analysis by mass spectroscopy. J. Biol. Chem.
276(4): 45497–45500, 2001.
Haab BB, Dunham MJ, Brown PO. Protein microarrays for highly parallel detection and quan-
titation of specific proteins and antibodies in complex solutions. Genome Biol. 2(2):
research0004.1–0004.13, 2001.
Hanash S. Disease proteomics. Nature 422: 226–232, 2003.
Hodges LC, Cook JD, Lobenhofer EK, et al. Tamoxifen functions as a molecular agonist
inducing cell cycle-associated genes in breast cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 1: 300–
311, 2003.
Francis for a short time was highly amused with his sword-leaves,
and then like all children, who are soon tired of their toys, he grew
weary of them, and they were thrown aside. Fritz picked up some of
them that were quite soft and withered; he held up one which was
pliable as a ribband in the hand: My little fellow, said he to his
brother, you can make whips of your sword-grass, take up the leaves
and keep them for this purpose, they will be of use in driving your
goats and sheep. It had been lately decided that it should be the
business of Francis to lead these to pasture.
Well then, help me to make them, said the child. They sat down
together. Francis divided the leaves into long narrow slips, and Fritz
ingeniously platted them into whip-cords. As they were working, I
saw with pleasure the flexibility and strength of the bands; I
examined them more closely, and found they were composed of long
fibres or filaments; and this discovery led me to surmise that this
supposed sword-grass might be a very different thing, and not
improbably the flax-plant of New Zealand, called by naturalists
Chlomidia, and by others Phormion19. This was a valuable discovery
in our situation: I knew how much my wife wished for the
production, and that it was the article she felt most the want of; I
therefore hastened to communicate the intelligence to her, upon
hearing which she expressed the liveliest joy: This, said she, is the
most useful thing you have found; I entreat you, lose not a moment
in searching for more of these leaves, and bring me the most you
can of them; I will make you stockings, shirts, clothes, thread,
ropes.....
In short, give me flax, looms, and frames, and I shall be at no loss
in the employment of it. I could not help smiling at the scope she
gave to her imagination, on the bare mention of flax, though so
much was to be done between the gathering the leaves and having
the cloth she was already sewing in idea. Fritz whispered a word in
Jack’s ear; both went to the stable, and without asking my leave,
one mounted Lightfoot, the other the buffalo, and galloped off
towards the wood so fast that I had no time to call them back; they
were already out of sight: their eagerness to oblige their mother in
this instance pleaded their forgiveness, and I suffered them to go on
without following them, purposing to proceed and bring them back if
they did not soon return.
In waiting for them I conversed with my wife, who pointed out to
me with all the animation and spirit of useful enterprise so natural to
her character, the various machinery I must contrive for spinning and
weaving her flax for the manufactory of cloths, with which she said
she should be able to equip us from head to foot; in speaking of
which, her eyes sparkled with the love of doing good, the purest
kind of joy, and I promised her all she desired of me.
In a quarter of an hour our deserters came back on a full trot, and
I was pleased to see them again; like true hussars, they had foraged
the woods, and heavily loaded their cattle with the precious plant,
which they threw at their mother’s feet with joyful shouts. We could
not blame their abrupt departure. Jack made us laugh in recounting
with his accustomed vivacity and drollery at what a rate he had
trotted his buffalo to keep up with Lightfoot, and how his great
horned horse had thrown him by a side leap; yet that
notwithstanding these, he and his buffalo, as in duty and allegiance
bound, were, as ever, at the entire command of their acknowledged
queen. Well, said I, you shall then all assist her with consummate
diligence in preparations for the work she is about to engage in, and
previously in steeping the flax.
Fritz.—How is flax prepared, father, and what is meant by steeping
it?
Father.—Steeping flax, or hemp, is exposing it in the open air, by
spreading it on the ground to receive the rain, the wind, and the
dew, in order in a certain degree to liquefy the plant; by this means
the ligneous or cortical parts of the flax are separated with more
ease from the fibrous; a kind of vegetable glue that binds them is
dissolved, and it can then be perfectly cleaned with great facility,
and the parts selected which are fit for spinning.
Fritz.—But may not the natural texture of this part be destroyed
by exposing it so long to wet?
Father.—That certainly may happen when the process is managed
injudiciously, and the flax not duly turned; the risk, however, is not
great, the fibrous part has a peculiar tenacity, which enables it to
resist longer the action of humidity; flax may be even steeped
altogether in water without injury. Many think this the best and
quickest method, and I am of their opinion.
My wife coincided with me, especially in the sultry climate we
inhabited: she therefore proposed to soak the flax in Flamingo
Marsh, and to begin by making up the leaves in bundles, as they do
hemp in Europe. We agreed to her proposal, and joined in this
previous and necessary preparation of the flax during the rest of the
day.
Next morning the ass was put to the small light car, loaded with
bundles of leaves; Francis and the monkey sat on them, and the
remainder of the family gaily followed with shovels and pickaxes. We
stopped at the marsh, divided our large bundles into smaller, which
we placed in the water, pressing them down with stones and leaving
them in this state till our sovereign should direct us to remove and
set them in the sun to dry, and thus render the stems soft and easy
to peel. In the course of this work we noticed with admiration the
instinct of the flamingoes in building their cone-shaped nests above
the level of the marsh, each nest having a recess in the upper part,
in which the eggs are securely deposited, while the contrivance
enables the female to sit with her legs in the water: the nest is of
clay closely cemented, so as to resist all danger from the element till
the young can swim.
A fortnight after, my wife told us the flax was sufficiently steeped.
We then took it out of the water, and spread it on the grass in the
sun, where it dried so well and rapidly that we were able to load it
on our cart the same evening, and carry it to Falcon’s Stream, where
it was put by till we had time to attend further to it, and make
beetles, wheels, reels, carding-combs, &c., as required by our expert
and skilful flax-manufacturer. It was thought best to reserve this task
for the rainy season, and to get ready what would be then necessary
during our confinement within doors. Uninformed as we were as to
the duration of this season, it was highly important to lay in a
competent stock of provisions for ourselves and for all the animals.
Occasional slight showers, the harbingers of winter, had already
come on; the temperature, which hitherto had been warm and
serene, became gloomy and variable; the sky was often darkened
with clouds, the stormy winds were heard, and warned us to avail
ourselves of the favourable moment to collect every thing that would
be wanted.
Our first care was to dig up a full supply of potatoes and yams for
bread, with plenty of cocoa-nuts, and some bags of sweet acorns. It
occurred to us while digging, that the ground being thus opened and
manured with the leaves of plants, we might sow in it to advantage
the remainder of our European corn. Notwithstanding all the
delicacies this stranger land afforded us, the force of habit still
caused us to long for the bread we had been fed with from
childhood: we had not yet laid ourselves out for regular tillage, and I
was inclined to attempt the construction of a plough of some sort as
soon as we had a sufficient stock of corn for sowing. For this time,
therefore, we committed it to the earth with little preparation: the
season, however, was proper for sowing and planting, as the
ensuing rain would moisten and swell the embryo grain, which
otherwise would perish in an arid burning soil. We accordingly
expedited the planting of the various palm trees we had discovered
in our excursions, at Tent House, carefully selecting the smallest and
the youngest. In the environs was formed a large handsome
plantation of sugar canes, so as to have hereafter every thing useful
and agreeable around us, and thus be dispensed from the usual toil
and loss of time in procuring them.
These different occupations kept us several weeks in unremitted
activity of mind and body; our cart was incessantly in motion,
conveying home our winter stock; time was so precious that we
could not even make regular meals, and limited ourselves to bread,
cheese, and fruits, in order to shorten them, to return quickly to our
work, and dispatch it before the bad season should set in.
Unfortunately, the weather changed sooner than we had
expected, and than, with all our care, we could be prepared for;
before we had completed our winter establishment, the rain fell in
such heavy torrents that little Francis, trembling, asked me whether
father Noah’s deluge was coming on again; and I could not myself
refrain from painful apprehension in surmising how we should resist
such a body of water, that seemed to change the whole face of the
country into a perfect lake.
The first thing to be done, and which gave us all sensations of
deep concern, was to remove without delay our aërial abode, and to
fix our residence at the bottom of the tree, between the roots and
under the tarred roof I had erected; for it was no longer possible to
remain above, on account of the furious winds that threatened to
bear us away, and deluged our beds with rain through the large
opening in front, our only protection here being a piece of sail-cloth,
which was soon dripping wet and rent to pieces. In this condition we
were forced to take down our hammocks, mattresses, and every
article that could be injured by the rain; and most fortunate did we
deem ourselves in having made the winding stairs, which sheltered
us during the operation of the removal. The stairs served afterwards
for a kind of lumber-room; we kept all in it we could dispense with,
and most of our culinary vessels, which my wife fetched as she
happened to want them. Our little sheds between the roots,
constructed for the poultry and the cattle, could scarcely contain us
all; and the first days we passed in this manner were painfully
embarrassing, crowded all together, and hardly able to move in
these almost dark recesses, which the fœtid smell from the close-
adjoining animals rendered almost insupportable: in addition, we
were half stifled with smoke whenever we kindled a fire, and
drenched with rain when we opened the doors. For the first time,
since our disaster, we sighed for the comfortable houses of our dear
country:—but what was to be done! we were not there, and losing
our courage and our temper would only increase the evil. I strove to
raise the spirits of my companions, and obviate some of the
inconveniences. The now doubly-precious winding stair was, as I
have said, every way useful to us; the upper part of it was filled with
numerous articles that gave us room below; and as it was lighted
and sheltered by windows, my wife often worked there, seated on a
stair, with her little Francis at her feet. We confined our live-stock to
a smaller number, and gave them a freer current of air, dismissing
from the stalls those animals that from their properties, and being
natives of the country, would be at no loss in providing for
themselves. That we might not lose them altogether, we tied bells
round their necks; Fritz and I sought and drove them in every
evening that they did not spontaneously return. We generally got
wet to the skin and chilled with cold, during the employment, which
induced my wife to contrive for us a kind of clothing more suitable to
the occasion; she took two seamen’s shirts from the chest we had
recovered from the wreck; and then, with some pieces of old coats,
she made us a kind of cloth hoods joined together at the back, and
well formed for covering the head entirely: we melted some elastic
gum, which we spread over the shirts and hoods; and the articles
thus prepared answered every purpose of water-proof overalls, that
were of essential use and comfort to us. Our young rogues were
ready with their derision the first time they saw us in them; but
afterwards they would have been rejoiced to have had the same:
this, however, the reduced state of our gum did not allow, and we
contented ourselves with wearing them in turn, when compelled to
work in the rain, from the bad effects of which they effectually
preserved us.
As to the smoke, our only remedy was to open the door when we
made a fire; and we did without as much as we could, living on milk
and cheese, and never making a fire but to bake our cakes: we then
availed ourselves of the opportunity to boil a quantity of potatoes
and salt meat enough to last us a number of days. Our dry wood
was also nearly expended, and we thanked Heaven the weather was
not very cold; for had this been the case our other trials would have
much increased. A more serious concern was our not having
provided sufficient hay and leaves for our European cattle, which we
necessarily kept housed to avoid losing them; the cow, the ass, the
sheep, and the goats, the two last of which were increased in
number, required a large quantity of provender, so that we were ere
long forced to give them our potatoes and sweet acorns, which by
the by they found very palatable, and we remarked that they
imparted a delicate flavour to their milk;—the cow, the goats, and
even the sheep, amply supplied us with that precious article:
milking, cleaning the animals and preparing their food, occupied us
most of the morning, after which we were usually employed in
making flour of the manioc root, with which we filled the large
gourds, which were previously placed in rows. The gloom of the
atmosphere and our low windowless habitation sensibly abridged our
daylight; fortunately, we had laid in a huge store of candles, and felt
no want of that article: when darkness obliged us to light up, we got
round the table, when a large taper fixed on a gourd gave us an
excellent light, which enabled my wife to pursue her occupation with
the needle, while I, on my part, was forming a journal and recording
what the reader has perused of the narrative of our shipwreck and
residence in this island, assisted from time to time by my sons and
their admirable mother, who did not cease to remind me of various
incidents belonging to the story. To Ernest, who wrote a fine hand,
was intrusted the care of writing off my pages in a clear legible
character; Fritz and Jack amused themselves by drawing from
memory the plants and animals which had most struck their
observation; while one and all contributed to teach little Francis to
read and write: we concluded the day with a devotional reading in
the Holy Bible, performed by each in turn, and we then retired to
rest, happy in ourselves, and in the innocent and peaceful course of
our existence. Our kind and faithful steward often surprised us
agreeably on our return from looking after the cattle, by lighting up
a faggot of dried bamboo, and quickly roasting by the clear and
fervent heat it produced, a chicken, pigeon, duck, or penguin from
our poultry-yard, or some of the thrushes we had preserved in
butter, which were excellent, and welcomed as a treat to reward
extraordinary toil. Every four or five days the kind creature made us
new fresh butter in the gourd-churn; and this with some deliciously
fragrant honey spread on our manioc cakes, formed a collation that
would have raised the envy of European epicures. These unexpected
regales represented to our grateful hearts so many little festivals, the
generous intention of which made us forget our bad
accommodations and confinement.
The fragments of our meals belonged in right to our domestic
animals, as part of the family. We had now four dogs, the young
jackal, the eagle, and the monkey, to feed; they relied with just
confidence on the kindness of their respective masters, who
certainly would have deprived themselves to supply the wants of
their helpless dependents. Francis had taken under his mighty
protection the two little bull-dogs; my wife Ponto, and I the brave
Turk:—thus each had his attendant, of which he took care, and no
one was dispensed from the offices of tenderness and vigilance. If
the buffalo, the onagra, and pig had not found sustenance abroad,
they must have been killed or starved, and that would have given us
much pain. In the course of these discomforts it was unanimously
resolved on, that we would not pass another rainy season exposed
to the same evils; even my beloved consort, who felt such a
predilection for the abode at Falcon’s Stream, was frequently a little
ruffled and out of temper with our inconvenient situation, and
insisted more than any of us on the propriety of building elsewhere a
more spacious winter residence: she wished, however, to return to
our castle in the tree every summer, and we all joined with her in
that desire. The choice of a fresh abode now engrossed our
attention, and Fritz in the midst of consultation came forward
triumphantly with a book he had found in the bottom of our clothes’
chest. Here, said he, is our best counsellor and model, Robinson
Crusoe; since Heaven has destined us to a similar fate, whom better
can we consult? as far as I remember, he cut himself an habitation
out of the solid rock: let us see how he proceeded; we will do the
same and with greater ease, for he was alone; we are six in number,
and four of us able to work. Well spoken, son, said I: this activity
and courage give me pleasure; let us then strive to be as ingenious
as Robinson Crusoe.
And why not? observed Jack—Have we not an island, rocks, and
tools from abroad as good as he had, and, as brother Fritz says,
more hands to use them?
We assembled, and read the famous history with an ardent
interest; it seemed though so familiar, quite new to us: we entered
earnestly into every detail and derived considerable information from
it, and never failed to feel lively gratitude towards God who had
rescued us all together, and not permitted one only of us to be cast
a solitary being on the island. The occurrence of this thought
produced an overwhelming sense of affection among us, and we
could not refrain from throwing ourselves into each others arms,
embracing repeatedly, and the pathetic scene ended in mutual
congratulations.
Francis repeated his wish to have a Man Friday; Fritz thought it
better to be without such a companion, and to have no savages to
contend with. Jack was for the savages, warfare and encounters.
The final result of our deliberations was to go and survey the rocks
round Tent-House, and to examine whether any of them could be
excavated for our purpose.
Our last job for the winter, undertaken at my wife’s solicitation,
was a beetle for her flax and some carding-combs. I filed large nails
till they were even, round, and pointed; I fixed them at equal
distances in a sheet of tin, and raised the sides of it like a box; I
then poured melted lead between the nails and the sides, to give
firmness to their points, which came out four inches. I nailed this tin
on a board, and the machine was fit for work. My wife was impatient
to use it; and the drying, peeling, and spinning her flax, became
from this time a source of inexhaustible delight.
CHAPTER XXXII.
Spring;—spinning;—salt mine.
I can hardly describe our joy when, after many tedious and gloomy
weeks of rain, the sky began to brighten, the sun to dart its benign
rays on the humid earth, the winds to be lulled, and the state of the
air became mild and serene. We issued from our dreary hovels with
joyful shouts, and walked round our habitation breathing the
enlivening balmy ether, while our eyes were regaled with the
beauteous verdure beginning to shoot forth on every side. Reviving
nature opened her arms, every creature seemed reanimated, and we
felt the genial influence of that glorious luminary which had been so
long concealed from our sight, now returned like a friend who has
been absent, to bring us back blessings and delight. We rapidly
forgot in new sensations the embarrasments and weary hours of the
wet season, and with jocund, hopeful hearts, looked forward to the
toils of summer as enviable amusements.
The vegetation of our plantation of trees was rapidly advancing;
the seed we had thrown into the ground was sprouting in slender
blades that waved luxuriantly; a pleasing tender foliage adorned the
trees; the earth was enamelled with an infinite variety of flowers,
whose agreeable tints diversified the verdure of the meadows.
Odorous exhalations were diffused through the atmosphere; the
song of birds was heard around; they were seen between the leaves
joyfully fluttering from branch to branch; their various forms and
brilliant plumage heightened this delightful picture of the most
beautiful spring, and we were at once struck with wonder and
penetrated with gratitude towards the Creator of so many beauties.
Under these impressions we celebrated the ensuing Sunday in the
open air, and with stronger emotions of piety than we had hitherto
felt on the fertile shores upon which we had been so miraculously
saved and fostered. The blessings which surrounded us were ample
compensation for some uneasy moments which had occasionally
intervened, and our hearts, filled with fresh zeal, were resolved to be
resigned, if it should be the will of God, to pass the residue of our
days in this solitude with serenity of soul and every due exertion.
The force of paternal feelings, no doubt, made me sometimes form
other wishes for my children; but these I buried in my own breast,
for fear of disturbing their tranquillity: but if I secretly indulged a
desire for some event that might prolong and even increase their
happiness, I nevertheless wholly submitted all to the Divine will, the
manifestation of which I awaited in becoming thankfulness and
patience.
Our summer occupations commenced by arranging and thoroughly
cleaning Falcon’s Nest, the order and neatness of which the rain and
dead leaves blown by the wind had disturbed: in other respects,
however, it was not injured, and in a few days we rendered it
completely fit for our reception; the stairs were cleared, the rooms
between the roots re-occupied, and we were left with leisure to
proceed to other employments. My wife lost not a moment in
resuming the process of her flax concern. Our sons hastened to lead
the cattle to the fresh pastures, already dried by the sun; whilst it
was my task to carry the bundles of flax into the open air, whereby
heaping stones together I contrived an oven sufficiently commodious
to dry it well. The same evening we all set to work to peel, and
afterwards to beat it and strip off the bark, and lastly to comb it with
my carding machine, which fully answered the purpose. I took this
somewhat laborious task on myself, and drew out such distaffs full of
long soft flax ready for spinning, that my enraptured wife ran to
embrace me, to express her heartfelt acknowledgement, requesting
me to make her a wheel without delay, that she might enter upon
her favourite work.
At an earlier period of my life I had practised turnery for my
amusement; now, however, I was unfortunately destitute of the
requisite utensils; but as I had not forgotten the arrangement and
component parts of a spinning-wheel and reel, I by repeated
endeavours found means to accomplish those two machines to her
satisfaction; and she fell so eagerly to spinning, as to allow herself
no leisure even for a walk, and scarcely time to dress our dinners:
nothing so much delighted her as to be left with her little boy, whom
she employed to reel as fast as she could spin, and sometimes the
other three were also engaged in turns at the wheel, to forward her
business whilst she was occupied in culinary offices; but not one of
them was found so tractable as the cool-tempered quiet Ernest, who
preferred this to more laborous exertions, though such was our want
of linen and clothes, that we ought all readily and even eagerly to
have joined in procuring them; but our excursions, and the
necessary liberty they involved, were more agreeable to us than this
female occupation. Our first visit was to Tent-House, as we were
anxious to ascertain the ravages of winter there, and we found them
much more considerable than at Falcon’s Stream, and even dreadful:
the tempest and rain had beaten down the tent, carried away a part
of the sail-cloth, and made such havoc amongst our provisions, that
by far the largest portion of them was spotted with mildew, and the
remainder could be only saved by drying them instantly. Luckily, our
handsome pinnace had been for the most part spared; it was still at
anchor, ready to serve us in case of need; but our tub-boat was in
too shattered a state to be of any further service.
In looking over the stores we were grieved to find the gunpowder
most damaged, of which I had left three barrels in the tent instead
of placing them in a more sheltered situation in the cavity of the
rock. The contents of two were rendered wholly useless. I thought
myself fortunate on finding the remaining one in tolerable condition,
and derived from this great and irreparable loss a cogent motive to
fix upon winter quarters where our stores and wealth would not be
exposed to such cruel dilapidations.
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookultra.com